Search

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast is very rare, accounting for 1% of all soft tissue breast tumors. AS may present as primary tumors of the breast or as secondary lesions usually associated with previous radiotherapy. Commonly, secondary AS affects older women (median age 67-71 years) with a clinical history of breast cancer. The preferred site of onset of RIAS is the edge of radiation fields, where radiation doses and tumor necrosis may be heterogeneous, resulting in a DNA damage and instability. Radical surgery is the treatment of choice, but no clear consensus exists on surgical management of breast AS. CASE REPORT: We describe an atypical case of relapsed RIAS after radical mastectomy, treated with new surgery and, considering the higher risk of recurrence, subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of radiation-induced angiosarcomas (RIAS) after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy has been increased to 0.14-0.5% among long survivors. Nevertheless, even if RIAS continues to be prognostically an extremely unfavorable cancer due to a high rate of recurrence, distant spread, and median overall survival (OS) of about 60 months, the benefits of loco-regional breast radiotherapy are clearly higher than the risk in developing angiosarcoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal disease despite integrated treatment comprising radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, with a median overall survival of less than 15 months. For recurrent glioblastoma, there is yet no standard therapy, considering that Bevacizumab have failed to improve overall survival (OS) while regorafenib had a little benefit over standard chemotherapy. In addition, the disease control rate is almost exclusively stability, with a poor objective response rate. CASE REPORT: Here we present a case of rapid response to regorafenib in early glioblastoma progression at the end of adjuvant radiotherapy: after a single cycle of regorafenib the patient observed an impressive improvement in clinical condition, disappearance of headaches and a clear reduction of neoplastic tissue in MRI. A brief review about new radiological patterns in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) related to the introduction in clinical practice of antiangiogenic drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors has also been carried out. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib was certainly a first turning point in the second-line treatment of GBM, showing longer response rates and mostly disease stability than bevacizumab. A switch-maintenance strategy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may represent a valid second-line therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, new evidence of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy utility in clinical practice has been developed. This assay is emerging as a new promising tool to use as a noninvasive biomarker for cancer mutation profiling. Additional data supporting the clinical validity of cell free DNA (cfDNA) based testing is necessary to inform optimal use of these assays in the clinic., Materials and Methods: A total of 398 cancer patients were analyzed by FoundationOne Liquid Analysis (F1LA), a genomic profiling assay and by standard NGS diagnostic ThermoFisher platform. The association between diagnostic technique was evaluated using a Poisson regression model. FoundationOne Liquid (F1L) and FoundationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) detect 70 and 324 cancer-related genes alterations, respectively, including genomic signatures tumor fraction, blood tumor mutational burden (only for the 324 genes version), and microsatellite instability high status. Both assays used a single DNA extraction method to obtain cfDNA. The real-life clinical impact and feasibility of F1L and F1LCDx were evaluated across different solid tumors in our department., Results: Between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2021, 398 samples of different tumor types from 398 patients were analyzed (overall success rate: 92%, in FoundationOne Liquid CDx Analysis success rate: 97%). Most frequent molecular alterations were TP53 (74), APC (40), DNMT3A (39), KRAS (23). The comprehensive clinical impact of F1LA compared with standard diagnostic was 64.7% versus 22.1% [risk ratio (RR) = 2.94; p  < 0.001] and the potential clinical impact was 58.6% versus 11.0% (RR = 5.32; p  < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, some clinical cases were selected, in which F1LA detected actionable alterations offering an unexpected therapeutic choice., Conclusions: Although additional studies are needed to better select patients and setting, NGS F1LA is a useful, noninvasive, and repeatable assay to guide therapeutic choice in oncology. It provides a snapshot of cancer heterogeneity profile that could be incorporated in routinely clinical practice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: EM: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Biocartis and expert opinion for ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology). FM: advisory board for MSD, Lilly, and AstraZeneca. FDV: advisory board for Amgen, Lilly, Roche, and Celgene. MO: Honoraria from Epionpharma, Italfarmaco and research funding from Eisai, travel and accommodation expenses for meetings from Roche. AA: Roche employed. RS: Roche employed. BM: Roche employed. FC: Advisory Boards: Roche, Amgen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, Servier, BMS, Celgene, Lilly; Institutional Research Grants: Bayer, Roche, Merck, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Ipsen. TT: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

A subset of colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal phenotype (CMS4) displays an aggressive disease, with an increased risk of recurrence after surgery, reduced survival, and resistance to standard treatments. It has been shown that the AXL and TGFβ signaling pathways are involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, migration, metastatic spread, and unresponsiveness to targeted therapies. However, the prognostic role of the combination of these biomarkers and the anti-tumor effect of AXL and TGFβ inhibition in CRC still has to be assessed. To evaluate the role of AXL and TGFβ as negative biomarker in CRC, we conducted an in-depth in silico analysis of CRC samples derived from the Gene Expression Omnibus. We found that AXL and TGFβ receptors are upregulated in CMS4 tumors and are correlated with an increased risk of recurrence after surgery in stage II/III CRC and a reduced overall survival. Moreover, we showed that AXL receptor is differently expressed in human CRC cell lines. Dual treatment with the TGFβ galunisertib and the AXL inhibitor, bemcentinib, significantly reduced colony formation and migration capabilities of tumor cells and displayed a strong anti-tumor activity in 3D spheroid cultures derived from patients with advanced CRC. Our work shows that AXL and TGFβ receptors identify a subgroup of CRC with a mesenchymal phenotype and correlate with poor prognosis. Dual inhibition of AXL and TGFβ could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with this aggressive disease.

Background: Despite the advancements in new therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC), chemotherapy still constitutes the mainstay of the medical treatment. For this reason, new strategies to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy are desirable. Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown to increase the activity of DNA damaging chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of CRC, however previous clinical trials failed to validate these results and pointed out dose-limiting toxicities that hamper the use of such combinations in unselected CRC patients. Nevertheless, in these studies little attention was paid to the mutational status of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes., Methods: We tested the combination of the PARPi niraparib with either 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or irinotecan (SN38) in a panel of 12 molecularly annotated CRC cell lines, encompassing the 4 consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs). Synergism was calculated using the Chou-Talalay method for drug interaction. A correlation between synergism and genetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair was performed. We used clonogenic assays, mice xenograft models and patient-derived 3D spheroids to validate the results. The induction of DNA damage was studied by immunofluorescence., Results: We showed that human CRC cell lines, as well as patient-derived 3D spheroids, harboring pathogenic ATM mutations are significantly vulnerable to PARPi/chemotherapy combination at low doses, regardless of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and microsatellite status. The strongest synergism was shown for the combination of niraparib with irinotecan, and the presence of ATM mutations was associated to a delay in the resolution of double strand breaks (DSBs) through HRR and DNA damage persistence., Conclusions: This work demonstrates that a numerically relevant subset of CRCs carrying heterozygous ATM mutations may benefit from the combination treatment with low doses of niraparib and irinotecan, suggesting a new potential approach in the treatment of ATM-mutated CRC, that deserves to be prospectively validated in clinical trials.

Immunotherapy has recently become a major treatment modality for several types of solid tumours, achieving remarkable and long-lasting remissions. In metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were found to be effective as treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumours and received regulatory approval for this indication. However, mCRC is a complex disease and dMMR/MSI-H tumours represent a minority of the cases; therefore, new strategies are needed to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a larger population of patients. This review explores the immunological differences between dMMR/MSI-H and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite instability low (MSI-L) tumours, focuses on new proposed biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy and illustrates results reported from the main clinical trials with immunotherapeutic agents in CRC, addressing the most promising approaches being currently developed., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rising health issue, strongly related to other relevant medical conditions such as (HIV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Correct assessment of patients with SCCA requires a multidisciplinary evaluation and adequate follow-up. Accurate local and systemic staging, as well as risk evaluation, are essential to optimal treatment planning. Early stage tumours can be definitively treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, while salvage surgery is usually reserved for patients who develop local recurrence. Distant recurrence and de novo metastatic disease are associated with poorer prognosis and require palliative systemic chemotherapy, with different single agent and combination options available. Finally, recent discoveries on the carcinogenesis of SCCA have allowed the development of innovative treatment options, the most promising being immune checkpoint inhibitors. The limited systemic treatments for SCCA and low incidence of the disease, together with insufficient data from clinical research could explain the poor outcomes of these patients, which should therefore be managed in high volume centres and enrolled in clinical trials whenever possible. This article summarises the main strategies for treating patients with SCCA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EM: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier and expert opinion for European Society of Medical Oncology., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: The emerging role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted panels is revolutionising our approach to cancer patients, providing information on gene alterations helpful for diagnosis and clinical decision, in a short time and with acceptable costs., Materials and Methods: In this work, we evaluated the clinical application of FoundationOne CDx test, a hybrid capture-based NGS. This test identifies alterations in 324 genes, tumour mutational burden and genomic signatures as microsatellite instability. The decision to obtain the NGS assay for a particular patient was done according to investigator's choice., Results: Overall, 122 tumour specimens were analysed, of which 84 (68.85%) succeeded. The success rate was influenced by type of specimen formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE block vs FFPE slides), by origin of the sample (surgery vs biopsy) and by time of fixation (<5 years vs ≥5 years). The most frequent subgroups of effective reports derived from colorectal cancer (25 samples), non-small-cell lung cancer (16 samples), ovarian cancer (10 samples), biliary tract cancer (9 samples), breast cancer (7 samples), gastric cancer (7 samples). The most frequent alterations found in whole population referred to TP53 (45.9%), KRAS (19.6%) and APC (13.9%). Furthermore, we performed an analysis of patients in whom this comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) had a relevance for the patient's disease., Conclusions: On our opinion, CGP could be proposed in clinical practice in order to select patients that could most benefit from the analysis proposed, like patients with good performance status without any available treatments or with unexpected resistance to a therapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TT: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. FM: advisory board for Lilly, MSD. EM: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Biocartis and expert opinion for ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology). MO: Honoraria from Epionpharma, Italfarmaco and research funding from Eisai, travel and accommodation expenses for meetings rom Roche. FDV: advisory board for Amgen, Lilly, Roche, Celgene. FCi: advisory board for Merck, Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Servier, Symphogen, Pfizer and research funding from Roche, Merck, Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen. FM: BMS, MSD, Astrazeneca, Incyte., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Tumor heterogeneity represents a possible cause of error in detecting predictive genetic alterations on tumor tissue and can be overcome by testing alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using liquid biopsy. We assessed 72 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using Idylla™ Biocartis, a fully automated platform that evaluates the most frequent mutations of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes. We correlated the results of liquid biopsy and standard tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses to patient clinical features. The overall agreement was 81.94%. Concordance was 85.71% and 96.15% in treatment-naïve patients and in the patient subgroup with liver metastases, respectively. In liver metastases positive, treatment-naïve patients, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 92.31%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Circulating mutational fraction (CMF) was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases and high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In a subgroup of patients pre-treated with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents, emerging KRAS mutations were evidenced in 33% of cases. Testing RAS/BRAF mutations on plasma using the Idylla™ Biocartis platform is feasible and reliable in mCRC patients in clinical practice., Competing Interests: P.P.V.: consultancy for Biocartis. E.M.: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier and expert opinion for ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology). T.T.: advisory board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. F.M.: advisory board for Lilly, MSD. F.D.V.: advisory board for Amgen, Lilly, Roche, Celgene. F.C.: advisory board for Merck, Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Servier, Symphogen,Pfizer and research funding from Roche, Merck, Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen. V.D.F., E.F.G., D.C., C.C., C.B., L.P., M.T., G.A., V.C., A.D.L., V.F., V.M.I., F.M., G.M., S.N., R.F., A.L., M.C. declare no competing conflict of interest regarding the following manuscript. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.