Search

OBJECTIVE: There has been little evidence of the impact of preventive services during pregnancy covered under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on birthing parent and infant outcomes. To address this gap, this study examines the association between Medicaid expansion under the ACA and birthing parent and infant outcomes of low-income pregnant people. METHODS: This study used individual-level data from the 2004-2017 annual waves of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). PRAMS is a surveillance project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and health departments that annually includes a representative sample of 1,300 to 3,400 births per state, selected from birth certificates. Birthing parents outcomes of interest included timing of prenatal care, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cigarette smoking during pregnancy, and postpartum care. Infant outcomes included initiation and duration of breastfeeding, preterm birth, and birth weight. The association between ACA Medicaid expansion and the birthing parent and infant outcomes were examined using difference-in-differences estimation. RESULTS: There was no association between Medicaid expansion and the outcomes examined after correcting for multiple testing. This finding was robust to several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Study findings suggest that expanded access to more complete insurance benefits with limited cost-sharing for pregnant people, a group that already had high rates of insurance coverage, did not impact the birthing parents and infant health outcomes examined.

Objectives: Evidence has emerged on the health dangers of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use among pregnant women and neonates. We examined whether rural residence is a risk factor for smoking and e-cigarette use among women during the peripartum period in the United States. Methods: This study was based on pooled cross-sectional 2015-2020 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. The outcome was exclusive smoking, exclusive e-cigarette use, and use of both products (ie, dual use) versus use of neither tobacco product by women with live infants aged 2 to 6 months. We examined rural–urban differences in outcome by using univariate and multivariable multinomial logistic regressions with post hoc contrasts and marginal analyses, adjusting for complex survey design and nonresponse. Results: During the peripartum period, 5.0% of women were smoking combustible cigarettes, 5.0% were using e-cigarettes, and 1.9% were using both tobacco products. The crude prevalence of e-cigarette use was 1.1 percentage point higher, and the adjusted prevalence was 0.8 percentage points lower for rural versus urban women (P <.001 for both). Among rural women, 6.7% (95% CI, 6.3%-7.1%) smoked combustible cigarettes exclusively and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.3%-2.8%) used both products, as compared with 4.5% (95% CI, 4.4%-4.8%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-1.8%) of urban women, respectively, adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Conclusions: Maternal sociodemographic and health-related characteristics differed by combustible smoking versus e-cigarette use during the peripartum period. The effect of residence on e-cigarette use was significantly confounded by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, resulting in clinically comparable prevalence of e-cigarette use in rural and urban mothers with live infants aged 2 to 6 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported naloxone use during pregnancy among people in the United States with a recent live birth. A secondary objective was to characterize people at increased risk of overdose who did and did not use naloxone. Methods: We analyzed data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 26 US jurisdictions that conducted an opioid supplement survey from2019 to 2020. Respondentswith increased risk of experiencing an opioid overdose were identified based on self-reported use of illicit amphetamines, heroin, cocaine, or receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during pregnancy. Weighted prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for reported naloxone use at any point during pregnancy among people with an increased risk of overdose. Results: Naloxone use during pregnancy was reported by <1% of the overall study population (unweighted N = 88/34,528). Prevalence of naloxone use was 5.0% (95% CI: 0.0--10.6) among respondents who reported illicit amphetamine use, 15.2% (1.8--28.6) among those who reported heroin use, and 17.6% (0.0--38.1) among those who reported cocaine use. Naloxone use was 14.5% (8.4--20.6) among those who reported takingMOUD. Among peoplewith increased risk of overdose, no significant differences in naloxone use were observed by age, race/ethnicity, education level, residential metropolitan status, or insurance status. Conclusions: Prevalence of naloxone use among people with an increased risk of overdose during pregnancy ranged from 5.0% to 17.6%. Access to naloxone, overdose prevention education, and treatment for substance use disorders may help reduce morbidity and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Data Sources and Setting Study Design Data Collection/Extraction Methods Principal Findings Conclusion The 2020 Family First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) extended Medicaid coverage for enrollees without rechecking eligibility. Before that, women were eligible for Medicaid coverage up to 60 days postpartum. We examine the FFCRA's effect on Medicaid postpartum coverage, depression symptoms, and birth control use beyond 60 days after delivery.We use data from the 2016–2021 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). The primary sample includes 56,828 women who were income eligible up to 60 days postpartum or beyond in their state.We employ a difference‐in‐differences design comparing outcomes before and after the FFCRA between women who were not income eligible for Medicaid coverage beyond 60 days postpartum in their state and those who were income eligible. We estimate models without and with controlling for state‐specific trends in outcomes over time.N/A.There is an 8.1 percentage‐point increase in the likelihood of having Medicaid coverage without controlling for state‐specific trends, and 5.4 percentage‐points when controlling for state‐specific trends (both p < 0.05). There is a decline in likelihood of being uninsured by 3 percentage‐points (p < 0.05) without state‐specific trends and a smaller and non‐significant decline when including state‐specific trends. Estimated effects on depression symptoms and birth control use are small and statistically non‐significant.Following the FFCRA, there was an increase in Medicaid coverage beyond 60 days postpartum among women who would have been income ineligible for Medicaid after 60 days. However, there is a less pronounced effect on likelihood of being uninsured, which might be partly due to some switching from private to Medicaid coverage. There were no discernable effects on depression symptoms and birth control use. Examining additional health and health care utilization measures over a longer postpartum period is needed to further understand the FCCRA effects on these outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study investigated the predictors of postpartum insurance loss (PPIL), assessed its association with postpartum healthcare receipt, and explored the potential buffering role of Medicaid expansion. Methods: Data from the 2016–2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) were analyzed, covering 197,820 individuals with live births. PPIL was determined via self-reported insurance status before and after pregnancy. Postpartum visits and depression screening served as key health service receipt indicators. The association between PPIL and maternal characteristics was examined using bivariate analysis. The association of PPIL with health service receipt was assessed through odds ratios derived from multivariate logistic regression models. The role of Medicaid expansion was explored by interacting ACA Medicaid expansion status with the dichotomous PPIL indicator. Results: PPIL was experienced by 7.8% of postpartum people, with higher rates in Medicaid non-expansion states (13.6%) compared to 6.1% in expansion states (p < 0.05). Racial and ethnic disparities were observed, with 16.5% of Hispanic and 4.6% of white people experiencing PPIL. Individuals who experienced PPIL had decreased odds of attending postpartum visits (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73–0.90) and receiving screening for postpartum depression (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78–0.96) compared to those who maintained insurance coverage. People in expansion states with no PPIL had higher odds of postpartum depression screening (aOR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08–1.62). No differences in postpartum visits in expansion versus non-expansion were noted (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.93–1.36). Conclusions for Practice: Ensuring consistent postpartum insurance coverage offers policymakers a chance to enhance healthcare access and outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups. Significance: As numerous US states extend postpartum Medicaid coverage under the American Rescue Plan, understanding postpartum insurance loss (PPIL) and its association with healthcare for new mothers becomes vital. We identify PPIL risk factors and gauge its effect on accessing essential health services postpartum, focusing on Medicaid expansion's role. Our insights inform policies to enhance postpartum healthcare utilization and insurance access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) increase health risks leading to negative pregnancy outcomes, thus prompting the need for preconception care to address these risks. The aim of this study is to assess the association between ACEs score and self-report of having pre-pregnancy health conversations with a healthcare provider. Methods: Secondary analysis of PRAMS data from 2016 to 2020 was performed from 3 states and Washington, DC. ACEs score was categorized as 0 (low risk), 1–3 (intermediate risk), and ≥ 4 (high risk). Pre-pregnancy health conversations were measured using reports of being asked about the desire to have children, use birth control to prevent pregnancy, and/or improve health during any visit in the 12 months prior to pregnancy. Multivariate Poisson Regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders: age, race/ethnicity, income, education, insurance type, marital status, pregnancy intention, and parity. Results: A total of 10,448 PRAMS survey responses from 2016 to 2020 were included in the analysis. More than half of women reported having at least 1 ACE (51%). Those with an ACE score of ≥ 4 had 1.19 (95% CI: 1.01–1.41) times higher adjusted Prevalence Ratio (aPR) and those with an ACE score of 1–3 had about the same aPR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.93–1.09) of reporting pre-pregnancy health conversations with a healthcare provider compared to those with no ACEs. Conclusions for practice: The overall low percentage of respondents reporting receipt of pre-pregnancy health conversations with a health care provider indicates the need for these conversations to be had on a more routine basis. Significance: Women with high ACEs scores are at increased risk for unintended pregnancy, teenage pregnancy, prenatal substance use, and perinatal depression. Preconception care has been found to improve outcomes such as smoking cessation; greater prevalence of obtaining antenatal care; and lower rates of neonatal mortality. Given that ACEs can contribute to negative pregnancy outcomes, having health conversations with a healthcare provider about ways to improve health before pregnancy, the desire to have children or not, and about the use of birth control to prevent pregnancy is particularly needed among those with ACEs to reduce negative birth outcomes for both women and infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Existing evidence regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum mental health is mixed, with disparate studies showing increased, stable, or even reduced risk of postpartum depression (PPD) amid the pandemic. Furthermore, although it is plausible that the pandemic impacted the mental health of mothers from vulnerable and underserved communities differentially, few studies have characterized racial and ethnic differences in the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PPD. Materials and Methods: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data for 2018–2019 (pre-pandemic period) and 2020 (peri-pandemic period) from 40 sites (n = 110,779, representing 5,485,137 postpartum women) were used to determine whether rates of PPD changed during the first year of the pandemic. Postpartum depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item. Average marginal effects and contrasts of predictive margins derived from a multivariable logistic regression model were used to compare the risk of PPD before and during the pandemic in the overall sample and across racial/ethnic subgroups. Results: Adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, we found that the overall risk for PPD remained stable (0.0 percentage points [pp]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.7, 0.6 pp) in the first year of the pandemic. We detected no statistically significant changes in risk for PPD across seven of eight racial/ethnic groups considered; however, the risk of PPD among non-Hispanic Black women fell by 2.0 pp (95% CI: −3.5, −0.4 pp) relative to the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion: We identified important subgroup differences in pandemic-related changes in risk for PPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study aims to examine maternal care among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment. Data Sources and Study Setting: Pooled data from 2016 to 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveys from 44 states and two jurisdictions. Study Design: Using multivariable logistic regression, we calculated adjusted predicted probabilities of maternal care utilization (visit attendance, timeliness, adequacy) and quality (receipt of guideline‐recommended care components). We examined outcomes by primary language (Spanish, English) and two binary measures of state policy environment: (1) expanded Medicaid eligibility to those <133% Federal Poverty Level, (2) waived five‐year waiting period for pregnant immigrants to access Medicaid. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Survey responses from 35,779 postpartum individuals with self‐reported Hispanic ethnicity who gave birth during 2016–2020. Principal Findings: Compared to English‐speaking Hispanic people, Spanish‐speaking individuals reported lower preconception care attendance and worse timeliness and adequacy of prenatal care. In states without Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage, Hispanic birthing people had, respectively, 2.3 (95% CI:0.6, 3.9) and 3.1 (95% CI:1.6, 4.6) percentage‐point lower postpartum care attendance and 4.2 (95% CI:2.1, 6.3) and 9.2 (95% CI:7.2, 11.2) percentage‐point lower prenatal care quality than people in states with these policies. In states with these policies, Spanish‐speaking Hispanic people had 3.3 (95% CI:1.3, 5.4) and 3.0 (95% CI:0.9, 5.1) percentage‐point lower prenatal care adequacy, but 1.3 (95% CI:−1.1, 3.6) and 2.7 (95% CI:0.2, 5.1) percentage‐point higher postpartum care quality than English‐speaking Hispanic people. In states without these policies, those same comparisons were 7.3 (95% CI:3.8, 10.8) and 7.9 (95% CI:4.6, 11.1) percentage‐points lower and 9.6 (95% CI:5.5, 13.7) and 5.3 (95% CI:1.8, 8.9) percentage‐points higher. Conclusions: Perinatal care utilization and quality vary among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment. States with Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage had greater equity between Spanish‐speaking and English‐speaking Hispanic people in adequate prenatal care and postpartum care quality among those who gave birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is elevated among rural residents and contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality. Postpartum health insurance expansion efforts could address multiple causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, including IPV. The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between perinatal health insurance, IPV, and postpartum abuse screening among rural US residents. Methods: Using 2016‐2020 data on rural residents from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, we assessed self‐report of experiencing physical violence by an intimate partner and rates of abuse screening at postpartum visits. Health insurance at childbirth and postpartum was categorized as private, Medicaid, or uninsured. We also measured insurance transitions from childbirth to postpartum (continuous private, continuous Medicaid, Medicaid to private, and Medicaid to uninsured). Findings: IPV rates varied by health insurance status at childbirth, with the highest rates among Medicaid beneficiaries (7.7%), compared to those who were uninsured (1.6%) or privately insured (1.6%). When measured by insurance transitions, the highest IPV rates were reported by those with continuous Medicaid coverage (8.6%), followed by those who transitioned from Medicaid at childbirth to private insurance (5.3%) or no insurance (5.9%) postpartum. Nearly half (48.1%) of rural residents lacked postpartum abuse screening, with the highest proportion among rural residents who were uninsured at childbirth (66.1%) or postpartum (52.1%). Conclusion: Rural residents who are insured by Medicaid before or after childbirth are at elevated risk for IPV. Medicaid policy efforts to improve maternal health should focus on improving detection and screening for IPV among rural residents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, and when experienced during pregnancy, IPV substantially harms maternal health. Still, limited research has examined how IPV may influence prenatal oral health and dental care utilization. This study investigates the relationship between IPV during pregnancy and womens oral health experiences. DATA: Data are from 31 states from 2016-2019 in the United States that participated in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (N = 85,289)-a population-based surveillance system of live births conducted annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state health departments. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between physical IPV during pregnancy (measured by being pushed, hit, slapped, kicked, choked, or physically hurt any other way by a current or ex-husband/partner) and various oral health experiences. FINDINGS: Women who experienced prenatal physical IPV reported worse oral health experiences during pregnancy, including being more likely to report not knowing it was important to care for their teeth, not talking about dental health with a provider, needing to see a dentist for a problem, going to see a dentist for a problem, as well as having more unmet dental care needs. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate that women who experience physical IPV during pregnancy have lower knowledge of prenatal oral health care, more oral health problems, and greater unmet dental care needs. Given the risk of IPV and oral health problems for maternal and infant health, the study findings point to greater attention toward the oral health needs of IPV-exposed pregnant women.

Abstract Background Differential exposure to chronic stressors by race/ethnicity may help explain Black-White inequalities in rates of preterm birth. However, researchers have not investigated the cumulative, interactive, and population-specific nature of chronic stressor exposures and their possible nonlinear associations with preterm birth. Models capable of computing such high-dimensional associations that could differ by race/ethnicity are needed. We developed machine learning models of chronic stressors to both predict preterm birth more accurately and identify chronic stressors and other risk factors driving preterm birth risk among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White pregnant women. Methods Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) models were developed for preterm birth prediction for non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and combined study samples derived from the CDC’s Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (2012–2017). For each sample population, MARS models were trained and tested using 5-fold cross-validation. For each population, the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance, and variable importance for preterm birth prediction was computed. Results Among 81,892 non-Hispanic Black and 277,963 non-Hispanic White live births (weighted sample), the best-performing MARS models showed high accuracy (AUC: 0.754–0.765) and similar-or-better performance for race/ethnicity-specific models compared to the combined model. The number of prenatal care visits, premature rupture of membrane, and medical conditions were more important than other variables in predicting preterm birth across the populations. Chronic stressors (e.g., low maternal education and intimate partner violence) and their correlates predicted preterm birth only for non-Hispanic Black women. Conclusions Our study findings reinforce that such mid or upstream determinants of health as chronic stressors should be targeted to reduce excess preterm birth risk among non-Hispanic Black women and ultimately narrow the persistent Black-White gap in preterm birth in the U.S.

Background: Black birthing people have significantly higher risks of maternal mortality and morbidity compared with White people. Preconception chronic conditions increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet little is known about disparities in preconception health. This study applies an intersectional framework to examine the simultaneous contributions of racial marginalization and economic deprivation in determining disparities in preconception risk factors and access to care. Methods: Using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016–2020 (N = 123,697), we evaluated disparities by race and income in self-reported preconception hypertension, diabetes, obesity, depression, and smoking, as well as preconception insurance coverage and utilization of health care. We estimated linear regression models and calculated predicted probabilities. Results: Black respondents experienced higher probabilities of preconception obesity and high blood pressure at every income level compared with White respondents. Higher income did not attenuate the probability of obesity for Black respondents (linear trend p = 0.21), as it did for White respondents (p < 0.001). Conversely, while White respondents with low income were at higher risk of preconception depression and smoking than their Black counterparts, higher income was strongly associated with reduced risk, with significantly steeper reductions for White compared with Black respondents (difference in trends p < 0.001 for both risk factors). White respondents had higher probabilities of utilizing preconception care across all income levels, despite similar probabilities of insurance coverage. Conclusions: Higher income does not protect against the risk of preconception obesity and other preconception risk factors for Black birthing people as it does for White birthing people. Results point to the need to consider multiple forms of intersecting structural factors in policy and intervention research to improve preconception and maternal health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Women experiencing homelessness have higher rates of unintended pregnancy than stably housed women and may benefit from reproductive interconception care. How reproductive interconception care differs between women who did and did not experience perinatal homelessness is not known. We estimated prevalence ratios of reproductive interconception behaviors among US women experiencing homelessness during the perinatal period. Methods: We used data from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to calculate the prevalence of 5 reproductive interconception care outcomes: attending a maternal postpartum checkup, participating in a conversation with a health care provider about birth intervals, receiving family planning counseling, obtaining a prescription for short-acting contraception, and having a long-acting reversible contraceptive inserted. We used complex survey weights, stratified by perinatal homelessness, and converted adjusted logistic regression odds ratios between housing status and outcome variables to adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs. Results: Among participants, approximately 2.4% (weighted percentage; unweighted 2953 of 100 706) experienced homelessness sometime in the 12 months before their children were born; the majority were non-Hispanic (83.2%) and White (69.4%), were not married (82.2%), and had public health insurance (56.8%). Perinatal homelessness was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of attending a postpartum maternal visit (aPR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94) and a higher prevalence of having a conversation about birth intervals with their health care providers (aPR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21). Conclusions: Findings suggest that improving attendance at postpartum visits and evaluating birth interval conversations may strengthen interconception care practices while contextualizing social determinants such as housing stability. Improving uptake of postpartum visits may reduce unintended pregnancy, short birth intervals, and adverse birth outcomes in future pregnancies among women experiencing homelessness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Both psychosocial stress and gestational weight gain are independently associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Studies of the association between psychosocial stress and gestational weight gain (GWG) have yielded mixed results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between psychosocial stress and GWG in a large population-based cohort. Methods: Data from the nationally representative Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Phase 7 questionnaire 2012–2015 was utilized. Maternal psychosocial stress was assessed through response to questions designed to examine four domains of psychosocial stress (i.e., traumatic, financial, emotional, partner-related) three months prior to or during pregnancy. GWG was categorized using pre-pregnancy BMI and total GWG into inadequate, adequate, or excessive according to the Institute of Medicine's GWG guidelines. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between psychosocial stressors and adequacy of GWG. Analyses took into account complex survey design. Results: All respondents who delivered ≥ 37 weeks gestation with GWG information available were included in the analysis (n = 119,183). After adjusting for confounders, patients who reported financial stress were more likely to experience excessive versus adequate GWG (RRR 1.09 [95%CI: 1.02–1.17]). Exposure to any of the stressor groups did not significantly increase the risk of inadequate GWG. Conclusions: This large, population-based study revealed that among pregnant people in the US, exposure to financial stress is associated with higher risk of excessive GWG. Understanding the role stress plays in GWG will help to inform initiatives targeting this important aspect of prenatal care. Significance: What is already known on this subject?: Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) has been linked to postpartum weight retention and long-term adverse maternal and child health outcomes. Multiple studies have shown an association between psychosocial stress and adverse fetal outcomes. Risks of inadequate weight gain include low birthweight and failure to initiate breast-feeding whereas the risks of excessive weight gain include cesarean deliveries and postpartum weight retention for the mother and large-for-gestational-age infants, macrosomia, and childhood overweight or obesity for the offspring. What this study adds?: The 2012–2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) provides unique nationally representative data in which birth outcomes and maternal weight are linked to psychosocial stressors. Our study is the largest of its kind examining the link between stress and GWG and reveals that exposure to financial stress is associated with higher risk of excessive GWG in the US. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore patient demographic factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. Methods: A cross‐sectional study derived using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in collaboration with state and local health departments. This study sample included survey participants whose responses indicate they received counseling discouraging breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the relationship between factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. Results: Of the 10,911 participants in this sample, 9,695 participants who answered the question about receiving counseling discouraging breastfeeding while using marijuana were included in the analysis (89% response rate for the total sample). Twenty nine percent of participants were advised by a provider not to breastfeed while using marijuana. Participants who received this counseling were more likely to be people of color, age less than or equal to 29, with a high school education or less, unmarried, report governmental or no insurance prepregnancy, and report marijuana use postpartum. In the multivariate analysis, age less than or equal to 20 (P =.001), being unmarried (P =.023), and marijuana use postpartum (P =.034) remained associated with counseling against breastfeeding. Discussion: Our results suggest that individuals are being counseled differently. Unmarried and young people (age <20 years) were more likely to report receiving counseling against breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Given the growing national acceptability of marijuana use, the known benefits of breastfeeding, and the unclear risks of marijuana in human milk, there is a need to standardize counseling to avoid a missed opportunity to educate breastfeeding populations who use marijuana and to reduce the risk of counseling based on providers' personal attitudes and biases not aligned with evidence‐based guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Differential exposure to chronic stressors by race/ethnicity may help explain Black-White inequalities in rates of preterm birth. However, researchers have not investigated the cumulative, interactive, and population-specific nature of chronic stressor exposures and their possible nonlinear associations with preterm birth. Models capable of computing such high-dimensional associations that could differ by race/ethnicity are needed. We developed machine learning models of chronic stressors to both predict preterm birth more accurately and identify chronic stressors and other risk factors driving preterm birth risk among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White pregnant women. Methods: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) models were developed for preterm birth prediction for non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and combined study samples derived from the CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (2012–2017). For each sample population, MARS models were trained and tested using 5-fold cross-validation. For each population, the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance, and variable importance for preterm birth prediction was computed. Results: Among 81,892 non-Hispanic Black and 277,963 non-Hispanic White live births (weighted sample), the best-performing MARS models showed high accuracy (AUC: 0.754–0.765) and similar-or-better performance for race/ethnicity-specific models compared to the combined model. The number of prenatal care visits, premature rupture of membrane, and medical conditions were more important than other variables in predicting preterm birth across the populations. Chronic stressors (e.g., low maternal education and intimate partner violence) and their correlates predicted preterm birth only for non-Hispanic Black women. Conclusions: Our study findings reinforce that such mid or upstream determinants of health as chronic stressors should be targeted to reduce excess preterm birth risk among non-Hispanic Black women and ultimately narrow the persistent Black-White gap in preterm birth in the U.S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mental health conditions including substance use disorder are the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. Unfortunately, fears of child protective services' involvement interfere with maternal self-disclosure of substance use in pregnancy. Seeking to identify more mothers with substance use disorder in pregnancy or at delivery, and responsive to changes to the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), Connecticut requires hospital personnel to submit a deidentified notification to CPS for all newborns with prenatal substance exposure. However, it is unknown whether this approach aligns with maternal self-report on substance use. For the present study, we compared population parameters derived from CAPTA notifications submitted between March-December 2019 with parameters derived from self-report data on substance use in pregnancy from mothers who gave birth during the same timeframe. Results revealed that three times as many mothers self-reported any alcohol or drug use in pregnancy compared to the rate measured with CAPTA notifications. Compared to mothers who self-reported drug use in the third trimester, CAPTA notifications were made for statistically similar rates of Black mothers but half the self-reported rate of White and Hispanic mothers. This disparity reflects that CAPTA notifications were made for twice as many Black mothers as White or Hispanic. Although CAPTA notifications are not punitive in nature, this disparity reveals that the public health aims of this policy are not yet achieved. Significance: Accurate and equitable identification of infants with prenatal substance exposure and their mothers, coupled with non-stigmatized, non-punitive intervention is central to any public health response.The current study relies on 2019 data from Connecticut to understand accuracy and equity in identification of these infants by comparing hospital-based notifications to self-report substance use in pregnancy. We found that hospital approaches to detecting prenatal substance exposure identified twice as many Black mothers as White or Hispanic mothers. Compared to self-reported substance use in pregnancy, which detected equivalent rates of substance use across race groups, White and Hispanic mothers' substance use in pregnancy was under-identified in hospital settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Research demonstrates that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)—that is, experiences of abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction—are related to lower preventive dental care utilization in childhood and adolescence. However, limited research has explored the connection between ACEs and preventive dental care utilization in adulthood, and no research has examined this relationship during pregnancy. The current study extends existing research by investigating the relationship between ACEs and dental cleaning and dental care utilization during pregnancy among a sample of women who delivered live births in North Dakota and South Dakota. Methods: Data are from the 2017 to 2021 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in North Dakota and South Dakota (n = 7391). Multiple logistic regression is used to examine the relationship between the number of ACEs (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 or more) and dental cleaning during pregnancy. Results: Relative to respondents with 0 ACEs, those with 4 or more ACEs were significantly less likely to report having dental care during pregnancy (OR = 0.757, 95% CI = 0.638, 0.898). By racial and ethnic background, the results showed that the significant associations are concentrated among White and Native American respondents. Conclusions: The results suggest that exposure to 4 or more ACEs is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of dental cleaning during pregnancy among women who delivered a live birth in North Dakota and South Dakota. Further investigations are necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between ACEs and dental cleaning during pregnancy and replicate the findings in other geographic contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and prescription opioid use during pregnancy. METHODS: This study uses data on 2,999 individuals from the 2019 and 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from North Dakota and South Dakota. The relationship between ACEs and prescription opioid use during pregnancy is examined using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The prevalence of prescription opioid use increases alongside more ACE exposure. Compared to those with no ACEs, recent mothers with three or more ACEs have a 2.4 greater odds of prescription opioid use during pregnancy (aOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 2.437; 95% CI [confidence interval] = 1.319, 4.503). CONCLUSION: Exposure to three or more ACEs are associated with a higherrisk of prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Additional research is needed better understand the mechanisms that link ACEs and prescription opioid use during pregnancy, as well as how to best support those with ACEs exposure in a trauma-informed manner to reduce the risk of substance use.

BackgroundNutrition during pregnancy is important for maternal and infant health. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutritional support for low-income pregnant and postpartum individuals and children under the age of 5 y. However, WIC participation was in decline in the decade leading up to 2019.ObjectivesThis study examined individual and state predictors associated with WIC uptake among eligible individuals so as to identify subgroups for targeted intervention to improve participation.MethodsData came from the 2004-2019 waves of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a national survey of individuals who recently gave birth (N = 288,531). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine individual- and state-level and temporal predictors of WIC uptake among WIC-eligible respondents.ResultsAmong WIC-eligible respondents, ages of >35 (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.70), more than high school education (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 062, 0.65), English language proficiency (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.74), being married (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.72), White race, smaller family size, not having prepregnancy diabetes, and higher income were associated with lower odds of WIC uptake. Respondents in states with higher earned income tax credit rates and in the Northeast, Midwest, and West (compared with the South) had lower WIC uptake. Respondents in states with higher gross domestic product, higher unemployment rates, higher Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Medicaid caseloads, and Democrat governors had higher uptake; however, effect estimates were small and may not represent a meaningful change. Associations were the strongest during 2009-2015 than during other years, particularly for race/Hispanic origin, language, marital status, prepregnancy diabetes, family size, and prepregnancy.ConclusionsThis study identified several individual- and state-level characteristics associated with WIC uptake among low-income eligible respondents, paving the way for future interventions to target key subgroups to improve program participation.

Background: Despite including several provisions focused on American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people, few studies look at the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s potential impact among AI/AN birth givers, a group that experiences a disproportionate burden of adverse pregnancy outcomes. While ACA repeal conversations are ongoing, our objective was to examine changes, and equity in changes, in health care interactions before and after the ACA between AI/AN birth givers and white birth givers. Materials and Methods: We used the 2009?2015 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a state-level representative sample of individuals with live births. We included those identifying as AI/AN people or white people to estimate change over time in five health measures. We used adjusted linear probability regression models to compare prepregnancy recall periods before, during, and after the implementation of the ACA with the period just before implementation. Results: Among AI/AN birth givers, prepregnancy Medicaid coverage, multivitamin/prenatal use, and teeth cleaning increased by 10 percentage points (ppts), 5 ppts, and 9 ppts, respectively, and were larger than increases experienced by white birth givers (5, 3, and 2?4 ppts, respectively). Increases in preventive health care screening (12?18 ppts) and provider conversation (8?10 ppts) were similar for AI/AN birth givers and white birth givers. Discussion: While some ACA-associated increases in health care coverage and care were quantitatively larger among AI/AN birth givers compared with white birth givers, the existence of pre-ACA disparities suggests that the ACA may have reduced, but may not have eliminated, health inequities between AI/AN birth givers and white birth givers.

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality. Racial disparities in maternal outcomes such as maternal mortality in the United States (US) are well-documented, but the relationship of racism and/or discrimination with one's risk of developing a hypertension during pregnancy (HDP) is not well-studied. Methods: Data from 17 sites that asked questions regarding experiences with racism and/or discrimination during pregnancy via the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Phase 8 (2016–2020) was used. Logistic regression models were used compare the potential of stress induced HDP from perceived experiences of racism and/or discrimination versus the effect of systemic racism and/or discrimination (in healthcare settings and generally) on racial disparities in HDP diagnosis. Results: Among 9,907 live births, 18% of participants reported they were diagnosed with hypertension during pregnancy, with non-Hispanic Black individuals having the highest rate (21.8%). Regarding experiences of racism and/or discrimination, 76.4% of participants responded "yes", with all races/ethnicities studied here except non-Hispanic White individuals responding "yes" at rates higher than 89%. Perceived experiences of racism and/or discrimination did not statistically significantly affect one's odds of being diagnosed with HDP (OR = 0.94, CI: 0.74, 1.20). The disparity in odds of having hypertension during pregnancy between Non-Hispanic Black individuals and non-Hispanic White individuals was not statistically significant when perceived experiences of racism and/or discrimination were included in the model. Conclusions: Experiences of racism and/or discrimination drive racial disparities in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Public Health Implications: It is vital to eliminate racist and discriminatory practices and behaviors to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Significance: What is Already Known?: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality. Racial disparities in maternal mortality in the United States are well-documented. What this Study Adds?: The role of racism and/or discrimination in affecting one's risk of developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is not well-studied. Non-Hispanic and Hispanic Black individuals did not have statistically significantly higher odds of having hypertension during pregnancy compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, when experiences with racism and/or discrimination were included in the logistic regression model. This work implicates that experiences of racism and/or discrimination drive racial disparities in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Depression is common during pregnancy, can elevate risk for excessive or inadequate gestational weight gain (GWG), and is associated with both underutilisation and overutilisation of prenatal care. Whether GWG is associated with adequacy of prenatal care among women with and without depression in the United States is unknown. This study evaluated whether adequacy of prenatal care differed by depression status and GWG. Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 1,379,870 women who were pregnant with a singleton and delivered at 37–42 weeks gestation during 2016 to 2018 were included. Depression was self-reported. The Kotelchuck index was used to evaluate adequacy of prenatal care. Maternal weight gain was compared to GWG guidelines. Approximately 13.1% of the sample experienced depression during pregnancy. Although those with depression had increased odds of both inadequate and above adequate levels of prenatal care, this association was no longer significant after accounting for demographics, medical comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Individuals with inadequate levels of prenatal care with a normal pre-pregnancy body mass index gained less weight during pregnancy. The association between depression and prenatal care utilisation seems driven by demographic, medical comorbidity, and socioeconomic variables. Weight outcomes were associated with inadequate prenatal care utilisation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study used 2000–2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data to estimate trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy, as well as quitting smoking during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Weighted prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by year for each smoking-related measure. Annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC) in prevalence were estimated using Joinpoint regression to characterize trends over time. Results: Between 2000 and 2020, significant decreases in the prevalence of smoking before (23.0% to 14.0%; AAPC = −2.3% [95% CI = −2.9% to −1.7%]), during (13.2% to 6.5%; AAPC = −3.4% [95% CI = −4.0% to −2.7%]), and after pregnancy (18.9% to 8.8%; AAPC = −3.6% [95% CI = −4.3% to −2.9%]) were observed. For each measure, the fastest declines occurred largely throughout the 2010s (before: APC = −5.5% [2012–2020]; during: APC = −5.1% [2009–2020]; and after: APC = −6.4% [2012–2020]). The proportion of people who quit smoking during pregnancy significantly increased from 43.2% in 2000 to 53.7% in 2020 (AAPC = 1.0%; 95% CI = 0.2%–1.9%); however, Joinpoint regression detected relatively no change in quitting during pregnancy between 2010 and 2020 (APC = 0.0%; 95% CI = −0.4% to 0.5%). Conclusions: The prevalence of smoking before, during, and after pregnancy has reduced dramatically in the United States between 2000 and 2020, with the fastest declines occurring throughout the second decade of the twenty-first century. However, prevention and cessation efforts are still needed since approximately half of people who smoked before pregnancy continue to smoke during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately one in every eight mothers experience symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD) in the United States.1 Existing literature lacks an in-depth exploration of the social context from which symptoms of PPD arise. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the prevalence of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) among new mothers and to explore relationships between selected social determinants of health (SDOH) and the likelihood of experiencing PDS. Materials and Methods: Data were from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2016 and 2017 Questionnaires. Measured SDOH included socioeconomic status, social network support, psychosocial stress, and availability of resources to meet basic daily needs. Outcome measurement included a combination of two symptom indicator questions. Univariate analyses yielded weighted frequencies of descriptive statistics according to PDS status, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses yielded odds of reporting PDS. Results: The prevalence of self-reported PDS was 3.5%. Among mothers with PDS, most (54%) lived at or below the federal poverty guideline. Mothers who experienced psychosocial stress (e.g., intimate partner violence) during pregnancy had the highest likelihood of reporting PDS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]?=?3.60; confidence interval [95% CI], 2.12?6.12). Mothers who considered their most recent pregnancy unintended or mistimed were more likely to report PDS (aOR?=?1.36; 95% CI, 1.01?1.82), (aOR?=?1.65; 95% CI, 1.19?2.27), respectively. Conclusion: Results demonstrate that several social and psychosocial risk factors significantly impact the likelihood of experiencing PDS. The risk of PDS was particularly significant among lower socioeconomic status mothers, especially those with inadequate social network support. Public health efforts to mitigate potentially harmful social factors should focus on transforming public policies and social programs and increasing screening opportunities.

Background: Disability is a well-documented risk factor for food insecurity. However, prior literature has overlooked the possible connection between disability and food insecurity during the antenatal period. This study extends previous research by examining the relationship between those with any functional disabilities and food insufficiency during pregnancy among a sample of mothers. Methods: Data are from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2019–2020 (N = 9084). The relationship between the number of self-reported functional disabilities and food insufficiency is examined using modified multivariable Poisson regression. Results: After adjusting for control variables, the results reveal that those with any functional disability have a significantly higher risk of food insufficiency during pregnancy (risk ratio [RR] = 1.464, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.201–1.785). Findings reveal that all types of functional disability are associated with a higher risk of food insufficiency, including difficulty seeing, difficulty hearing, difficulty walking, difficulty remembering, difficulty with self-care, and difficulty communicating. Finally, the findings revealed that respondents with two functional disabilities (RR = 1.473, 95% CI = 1.153–1.882) and three or more functional disabilities (RR = 1.974, 95% CI = 1.534–2.541) are significantly more likely to report food insufficiency compared with respondents with no disabilities. Conclusions: There is a significant positive association between reporting functional disabilities and food insufficiency. Expanding current public health programs, educating health care professionals, and implementing effective screening guidelines directed at pregnant women with disabilities may reduce the prevalence of food insufficiency and promote greater health equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most rapid repeat pregnancies, defined as those occurring within 18 months of a previous birth, are unintended. These pregnancies are associated with later initiation of prenatal care and are more common among people with lower socio‐economic status and among racially and ethnically minoritised populations. Objectives: To assess prevalence and correlate pregnancies occurring in the immediate period after a live birth in the United States, using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Methods: We assessed data from the 2009–2020 PRAMS, a population‐based survey of perinatal maternal characteristics of mothers of liveborn infants in US locations. We assessed pregnancies reported during the immediate postpartum period (approximately 2–6 months post‐delivery), and term this 'very rapid repeat pregnancy' (VRRP). We assessed the adjusted prevalence of VRRP from 2009 to 2020. From 2016 to 2020, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for maternal characteristics. Results: The adjusted prevalence of VRRP ranged from 0.38% (95% CI: 0.29, 0.48) in 2009 to 0.76% (95% CI: 0.61, 0.91) in 2020. Demographic characteristics associated with VRRP included younger age, lower educational attainment, and being unmarried. Black mothers had a higher prevalence of VRRP compared to white mothers. Mothers who attended a healthcare visit in the 12 months preconception had a lower prevalence of VRRP as did mothers who attended a postpartum check‐up, compared to their counterparts without these visits. Among those receiving prenatal care, mothers whose prenatal healthcare provider asked about postpartum contraception birth had a lower prevalence of VRRP, compared to those not asked about postpartum contraception. Conclusions: VRRP appeared to increase over time in 2009–2020. Mothers who are younger, Black, have lower educational attainment, or who did not attend healthcare visits before or after pregnancy had a higher prevalence of VRRP and may comprise a population who would benefit from additional family planning resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a prevalent public health concern. Combustible cigarette use is associated with increased risk of PPD. While electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use during pregnancy is linked to increased risk of depressive symptoms during pregnancy, the relationship between e-cigarette use and PPD is not well understood. We sought to examine the association of e-cigarette use with PPD. Materials and Methods: Using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016–2019 data, unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses for PPD were conducted via three analyses where e-cigarette use (any vs. none) was retrospectively self-reported (1) in past 2-year, (2) prepregnancy (i.e., 3 months before pregnancy), and (3) during pregnancy (i.e., last 3 months of pregnancy). We conducted an additional past 2-year e-cigarette use analysis excluding those who used combustible cigarette and/or hookah. Covariates included age, race, ethnicity, combustible cigarette, and/or hookah use, prenatal care during the last trimester, health insurance coverage during pregnancy, physical abuse during pregnancy, income, and survey type. Results: Only unadjusted odds ratios from past 2-year e-cigarette use (1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42–1.87) and past 2-year e-cigarette use excluding individuals with cigarette and/or hookah use (1.78, 95% CI: 1.30–2.38) were statistically associated with PPD. No adjusted analyses were statistically significant. Conclusion: Any e-cigarette use, as compared to no use, does not appear to be an independent risk factor of PPD, though it may be a useful clinical marker of increased risk of PPD. Future studies are warranted to advance our knowledge of impact of e-cigarette use on PPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the smoking patterns of women who experienced stressful life events and the impact of racial disparities on the relationship between stressful life events, and prenatal/ postpartum smoking. Methods: The study analyzed data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Phase 8 (2016–2018) survey across five states (CT, LA, MA, MO, WI). Four stressful life event categories were created using thirteen affiliated questions: financial, trauma, partner, and emotional. We assessed: 1) the association between smoking and stressful life events, 2) the impact of race on the relation between smoking and stressful life events, and 3) the long-term effects of smoking on health by assessing the association between smoking and maternal morbidity. Bivariate statistics and multivariate Poisson regression models were conducted. Results: A total of 24,209 women from five states were included. 8.9% of respondents reported smoking during pregnancy, and 12.7% reported smoking postpartum. There was a significant association between all stressful life events and smoking. Trauma stressful life event had the strongest association with smoking during pregnancy (adjusted PR=2.01; CI: 1.79-2.27) and postpartum (adjusted PR= 1.80; CI: 1.64-1.98). Race and stressful life event interaction effects on smoking had varied significant findings, but at least one racial/ ethnic minority group (Black, Hispanic, Asian) had a higher smoking prevalence than non-Hispanic White per stressful life event category. Lastly, the prevalence of maternal morbidity was higher for smoking during pregnancy (adjusted PR= 1.28; CI: 1.19-1.38) and postpartum (adjusted PR= 1.30; CI: 1.22-1.38) compared to no smoking. Conclusions for Practice: Culturally congruent, multi-disciplinary care teams are needed to address both clinical and social needs to reduce stressful life events and smoking. Screenings for stress should be standardized with a referral system in place to provide ongoing support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the association of state-level lack of health insurance among women of reproductive age with variation in state low birth weight (LBW) rates. This cross-section study analyzes data from the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey for respondents with singleton, live births. Respondents were divided into groups by state-level percent of uninsured women aged 19–44 years. Poisson regression was used to model the association between state percent uninsured and likelihood of LBW, controlling for individual sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Sensitivity analyses were done for Medicaid and non-Hispanic Black subpopulations and alternative state characteristics, including Gini coefficients, total and public welfare expenditures, and state reproductive rights rankings. In adjusted multiple regression analyses, compared to respondents from states with <7% uninsured, respondents from states with 7% or more uninsured had an increased risk of LBW status (7–8.99% uninsured: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.18; 9–11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.17; >11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08–1.22). However, there was no evident dose–response gradient. Sensitivity analyses produced virtually identical findings for subpopulations, and no other state characteristics were significant. States with the highest level of insurance coverage had a significantly lower LBW rate than other states. However, there was little evidence for greater odds of LBW with the highest levels of uninsured. Individual risk factors dominated LBW models, while state differences in income inequality, reproductive health policy, and per capita spending explained little of the variance in LBW. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, and when experienced during pregnancy, IPV substantially harms maternal health. Still, limited research has examined how IPV may influence prenatal oral health and dental care utilization. This study investigates the relationship between IPV during pregnancy and women’s oral health experiences. Data Data are from 31 states from 2016–2019 in the United States that participated in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (N = 85,289)—a population-based surveillance system of live births conducted annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state health departments. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between physical IPV during pregnancy (measured by being pushed, hit, slapped, kicked, choked, or physically hurt any other way by a current or ex-husband/partner) and various oral health experiences. Findings Women who experienced prenatal physical IPV reported worse oral health experiences during pregnancy, including being more likely to report not knowing it was important to care for their teeth, not talking about dental health with a provider, needing to see a dentist for a problem, going to see a dentist for a problem, as well as having more unmet dental care needs. Conclusions Together, these findings indicate that women who experience physical IPV during pregnancy have lower knowledge of prenatal oral health care, more oral health problems, and greater unmet dental care needs. Given the risk of IPV and oral health problems for maternal and infant health, the study findings point to greater attention toward the oral health needs of IPV-exposed pregnant women.

Abstract Objectives This study assesses the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Methods This study uses data on 2,999 individuals from the 2019 and 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from North Dakota and South Dakota. The relationship between ACEs and prescription opioid use during pregnancy is examined using multiple logistic regression. Results The prevalence of prescription opioid use increases alongside more ACE exposure. Compared to those with no ACEs, recent mothers with three or more ACEs have a 2.4 greater odds of prescription opioid use during pregnancy (aOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 2.437; 95% CI [confidence interval] = 1.319, 4.503). Conclusion Exposure to three or more ACEs are associated with a higherrisk of prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Additional research is needed better understand the mechanisms that link ACEs and prescription opioid use during pregnancy, as well as how to best support those with ACEs exposure in a trauma-informed manner to reduce the risk of substance use.

Objective: Exposure to natural disasters during and after pregnancy may increase adverse mental health outcomes. Hurricanes Irma and Maria struck Puerto Rico in September 2017. Our objectives were to understand hurricane-related experiences, maternal health concerns, and the impact of hurricane experiences on postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS). Methods: We used data from the 2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to describe differences in maternal hurricane experiences among women who were pregnant during and after the 2017 hurricanes. We assessed maternal concerns and PDS. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs for the associations between hurricane experiences and PDS. Results: The most frequently reported hurricane experiences were losing power for ≥1 week (97%) and feeling unsafe due to lack of order/security (70%). Almost 30% of women who were pregnant during the hurricanes reported missing prenatal care. PDS were reported by 13% of women. Most hurricane experiences were associated with an increased prevalence of PDS. Feeling unsafe (aPR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9) and having difficulty getting food (aPR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1) had the strongest associations. Conclusions: Most women who were pregnant during or after hurricanes Irma and Maria struck Puerto Rico reported negative hurricane experiences, and most experiences were associated with an increased prevalence of PDS. Understanding the experiences of pregnant women during and after disasters and identifying risks for adverse mental health outcomes after pregnancy are important to inform emergency preparedness and prenatal and postpartum care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recognizes the benefit of home visiting programs in promoting positive birth outcomes. Despite this recommendation, previous studies have found mixed results with respect to the impact of home visits on birth outcomes. We evaluated the impact of the Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP) home visiting services on improving birth outcomes among low-income families. The present study used a sample of 1,110 children and families to examine how a team-based home visiting program influenced 2 significant birth outcomes, namely, birth weight and preterm birth. Using propensity score matching, the current study found that the home visited group had significantly lower rates of low birth weight compared with a propensity-matched comparison group (P <.01). Home visiting programs may play an important role in promoting positive birth outcomes, particularly when they are provided during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This cross-sectional study aimed to estimate the risks of adverse birth outcomes among pregnant smokers and the benefits of smoking cessation during pregnancy on birth outcomes across the United States. Methods: We performed an analysis of 203,437 pregnant women using data collected by the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from 2012 to 2017. PRAMS uses questionnaires and birth certificates to collect information about the socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women, smoking status before and during pregnancy, and birth outcomes. We assessed the relationship between self-reported smoking status during pregnancy and preterm birth, low birth weight, and small-for-gestational-age using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: In our study population, 80.43% of pregnant women never smoked, 10.55% of pregnant women quit smoking during pregnancy, and 9.02% continued smoking during pregnancy. Puerto Rico had the highest prevalence of non-smokers (94.12%), while West Virginia had the lowest prevalence of non-smokers (60.54%). Pregnant women who had a higher education level, were married, had less than 5 types of stress, and had government or private insurance before pregnancy had a higher prevalence of smokers who quit during pregnancy (quit smokers) than those that continued smoking (continuous smokers). Compared to non-smokers, continuous smokers had a significantly higher risk of low birth weight (AOR: 1.91, 95% CI 1.80, 2.03), preterm birth (AOR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.21, 1.41), and small-for-gestational-age (AOR: 2.22, 95% CI 2.07, 2.39). However, the relationships between quitting smoking and preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age were not significant. Conclusion: Our models suggest that smoking cessation during pregnancy can prevent adverse birth outcomes by significantly reducing the risk of preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age to almost comparable to not smoking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cesarean delivery (CD) is a common obstetrical procedure aimed at reducing maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in complicated pregnancies and medical emergencies yet carries potential complications. CD rates in the USA have increased over the years – likely associated with increased comorbidities. Thus, to expand the literature, our objective was to identify the likelihood of a woman having a CD when comorbidities – diabetes, high blood pressure (HBP), or depression – are present. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Binary and multivariable logistic regression were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine associations between pre-existing and gestational comorbidities and CD among pregnant women. Compared to those without a diagnosis, women with pre-existing diabetes (AOR: 1.69; CI: 1.54–1.86), pre-existing HBP (AOR: 1.58; CI: 1.46–1.69), and pre-existing depression (AOR: 1.14; CI 1.08–1.20; Table 2) were more likely to have a CD. Additionally, participants with gestational diabetes (AOR 1.43; CI 1.34–1.52), HBP (AOR 1.86; CI 1.76–1.95) and depression (AOR 1.13; CI 1.07–1.19) were also more likely to have a CD than those without comorbidities. Higher rates of CD were found among individuals with a pre-existing or gestational diagnosis of diabetes, HBP, or depression than those without these diagnoses. With increasing rates of these conditions, it is likely that CD rates will continue their trajectory in the USA. Thus, professional organizations can have more impact by popularizing and making effective evidence-based guidelines for management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An increasingly hostile policy climate has reshaped abortion access in the United States. Recent literature has studied the effects of restrictive abortion policies on reproductive health outcomes. This study is the first to investigate the association between state-level abortion policy hostility and the pregnancy intentions of women with a pregnancy resulting in live birth. Data are from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey, merged with a state-level legislative database from 2012-2018 and other state-level controls. Cross-sectional results reveal that a one-unit increase in abortion policy hostility is associated with a relative risk (odds) of having a live birth resulting from an unintended versus intended pregnancy that is 1.02 times as high (RRR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01, 1.03). This result corresponds to a 13% increase in the predicted probability of having a live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy between a zero-hostility and a maximumhostility state. Models stratified by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics reveal that the association between abortion policy hostility and live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy is particularly robust among women in younger, less educated, Medicaid, uninsured, and rural populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The postpartum period presents an opportunity to engage in discussions about alcohol consumption and related health harms. This study examined the prevalence of alcohol consumption among a sample of postpartum persons with a recent live birth and screening and brief intervention (alcohol SBI) or counseling by their providers. Methods: We analyzed 2019 data from a telephone survey conducted 9 to 10 months postpartum among individuals who responded to the standard Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey in 6 states. Weighted prevalence estimates were calculated for alcohol consumption and alcohol SBI after birth through up to 10 months postpartum. Results: Among 1790 respondents, 53.1% reported consuming alcohol postpartum. Among those who drank postpartum, 70.8% reported being asked about alcohol use by a healthcare provider. Slightly more than half of respondents who drank postpartum and were trying to get pregnant (52.4%) or were not using birth control at the time of the survey (59.8%) reported being asked about alcohol use. Approximately 25% of respondents who drank alcohol postpartum were advised about risky alcohol levels by a healthcare provider. Small proportions of individuals who drank alcohol postpartum and were pregnant or trying to get pregnant at the time of the survey were advised to reduce or stop drinking alcohol (10.6% and 2.3%, respectively). Conclusions: These findings suggest missed opportunities to promote health and prevent adverse alcohol-related health outcomes during the postpartum period through evidence-based tools such as alcohol SBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Oral health is an essential component of a healthy pregnancy. While most women work full-time while pregnant, research has overlooked the impact of occupational status and job loss on oral health experiences during pregnancy. To examine the impact of employment status and job loss on oral health experiences during pregnancy in the United States. Data Data are from eight sites (Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New York State, New York City, and Wisconsin) of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for the years 2016–2020 (n = 31,362). Multiple logistic regression is used to assess the relationship between occupational status (including employment status and unwanted job loss) during pregnancy and oral health. Findings Women who experienced an unwanted job loss in the prenatal period were at elevated risk of not having dental insurance, not receiving a dental cleaning during pregnancy, having an oral health problem, and having unmet dental care needs. Conclusion Experiencing unwanted job loss around the time of pregnancy is an important life event that corresponds to worse oral health experiences. There is a need for greater focus on adverse life events, such as job loss, especially during pregnancy, as a mechanism for oral health issues and challenges with proper access to dental health systems.

Abstract Background Despite evidence of the impact of breastfeeding information on breastfeeding rates, it is unknown if information sources and impact vary by race/ethnicity, thus this study assessed race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information sources and breastfeeding. Methods We used data from the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Race/ethnicity-stratified multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate associations between information source (e.g., family/friends) and breastfeeding rates (0 weeks/none,

Objectives: To assess emergency preparedness (EP) actions in women with a recent live birth. Methods: Weighted survey procedures were used to evaluate EP actions taken by women with a recent live birth responding to an EP question assessing eight preparedness actions as part of the 2016 Tennessee Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Factor analysis was used to group preparedness actions. Results: Overall, 82.7% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 79.3%, 86.1%] of respondents reported any preparedness actions, with 51.8% (95% CI 47.2%, 56.4%) completing 1–4 actions. The most common actions were having supplies at home (63.0%; 95% CI 58.5%, 67.4%), an evacuation plan for children (48.5%; 95% CI 43.9%, 53.2%), supplies in another location (40.2%; 95% CI 35.6%, 44.7%), and a communication plan (39.7%; 95% CI 35.1%, 44.2%). Having personal evacuation plans (31.6%; 95% CI 27.3%, 36.0%) and copies of documents in alternate locations (29.3%; 95% CI 25.0%, 33.5%) were least common. Factor analysis yielded three factors: having plans, having copies of documents, and having supplies. Specific preparedness actions varied by education and income level. Conclusions for Practice: Most Tennessee women (about 8 in 10 women) with a recent live birth reported at least one EP action. A three-part EP question may be sufficient for assessing preparedness in this population. These findings highlight opportunities to improve public health education efforts around EP. Significance: What is known on this subject? Current emergency preparedness guidelines recommend making emergency plans, building a disaster supplies kit, and having access to important personal documents. What this study adds? A majority of women (about 8 in 10) with a recent live birth had made at least some emergency preparations. Specific preparedness actions varied by education and income level. This highlights an opportunity to develop tailored public health emergency preparedness messaging according to population needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Poor oral health during pregnancy poses risks to maternal and infant well‐being. However, limited research has documented how proximate stressful life events (SLEs) during the prenatal period are associated with oral health and patterns of dental care utilization. Methods: Data come from 13 states that included questions on SLEs, oral health, and dental care utilization in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for the years 2016–2020 (n = 48,658). Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between levels of SLE (0, 1–2, 3–5, or 6+) and a range of (1) oral health experiences and (2) barriers to dental care during pregnancy while controlling for socio‐demographic and pregnancy‐related characteristics. Results: Women with more SLEs in the 12 months before birth—especially six or more—reported worse oral health experiences, including not having dental insurance, not having a dental cleaning, not knowing the importance of caring for teeth and gums, needing to see a dentist for a problem, going to see a dentist for a problem, and unmet dental care needs. Higher levels of SLEs were also associated with elevated odds of reporting barriers to dental care. Conclusions: SLEs are an essential but often understudied risk factor for poor oral health, unmet dental care needs, and barriers to dental care services. Future research is needed to understand better the mechanisms linking SLEs and oral health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breastfeeding is invaluable for postpartum physical healing and mental wellbeing, but psychosocial stress and depression impede such recovery processes. To inform future interventions and policies, associations between breastfeeding, maternal stress, and depression were examined. Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) were analyzed (2016–2019). Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Of the total sample (n = 95,820), approximately 88% of participants attempted breastfeeding. Our findings indicate that participants who experienced any form of stress had a slightly higher likelihood of breastfeeding compared to those without stress. Specifically, partner-related and financial-related stressors were significantly associated with increased odds of breastfeeding. However, no significant associations were observed trauma-related or emotional-related stressors and breastfeeding. Additionally, no significant association was found between depression at different stages (preconception, prenatal, and postpartum) and breastfeeding. A significant interaction effect was noted between having experienced any of the 13 stressors and Black race/ethnicity on breastfeeding odds. Similarly, significant interaction effects were observed between partner-related, trauma, financial, or emotional stressors and Black race/ethnicity. These findings emphasize the importance of considering various factors when promoting breastfeeding in diverse populations, and screening for psychosocial stress during postpartum visits. Our study recommends tailoring breastfeeding interventions to address the needs of Black mothers which could significantly improve maternal health and breastfeeding outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Diabetes may delay milk letdown, and perceiving milk production as insufficient can lead to breastfeeding cessation. We evaluated whether prepregnancy or gestational diabetes is associated with cessation of breastfeeding by 1 week postpartum. Methods: We analyzed 2016-2018 data from 42 sites in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a population-based survey of women with a recent live birth. Participants were surveyed 2-6 months after childbirth. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between prepregnancy or gestational diabetes only and breastfeeding <1 week postpartum among women who had initiated breastfeeding. Results: Among 82 050 women who initiated breastfeeding, 4.5% reported breastfeeding <1 week postpartum. Overall, 11.7% of women reported any history of diabetes in the 3 months before becoming pregnant; 3.3% reported prepregnancy diabetes, and 8.4% reported gestational diabetes only. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, the prevalence of breastfeeding <1 week postpartum did not differ significantly among women with prepregnancy diabetes or gestational diabetes only compared with women without any history of diabetes. The prevalence of breastfeeding <1 week postpartum was 4.4% among women without any history of diabetes, 5.6% among women with prepregnancy diabetes (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.91-1.46), and 4.5% among women with gestational diabetes only (aPR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20). Conclusions: We found no association between a history of diabetes prepregnancy or gestational diabetes only and breastfeeding <1 week postpartum in a large, population-based survey of postpartum women who initiated breastfeeding. Regardless of their diabetes status, women who want to breastfeed might benefit from interventions that support their ability to continue breastfeeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To estimate the association between feeling upset by experiences of racism and self‐reported depression during pregnancy among non‐Hispanic Black women using a large population‐based sample from the United States. Design: We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative cross‐sectional survey data with retrospective measures. Methods: Analysis of Phase 8 (2018) data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey included 7328 non‐Hispanic Black respondents with a recent live birth from 11 states and New York City. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between self‐report of feeling upset due to experience of racism during the year prior to delivery and self‐reported depression during pregnancy, controlling for potential confounders. Results: The prevalence of feeling upset due to experiences of racism was 11.4% and the prevalence of depression during pregnancy was 11.4%. Respondents who reported feeling upset due to the experience of racism had over two‐fold higher odds (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.67, 3.37) of experiencing depression during pregnancy compared to respondents who did not report feeling upset due to the experience of racism, adjusted for maternal age, educational attainment, marital status, pre‐pregnancy insurance type, region, and pre‐pregnancy depression. Conclusion: Respondents who felt upset due to the experience of racism in the year prior to delivery experienced significantly higher odds of depression during pregnancy, and thus are at an increased risk for adverse maternal outcomes. Impact Stress from racism and racial discrimination during the perinatal period may contribute to maternal morbidity, including perinatal depression, among Black women. No Patient or Public Contribution: The data in this study were collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. To our knowledge, the conduct of the study did not include patient or public contribution. Neither did the analysis, interpretation, nor manuscript preparation include patient or public contribution because we did not have funding to support the study or their involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Evidence of opioid use at hospital delivery has increased over the past two decades, increasing risk of neonatal withdrawal. Breastfeeding may improve infant outcomes, but little is known about breastfeeding experiences of women who have a history of opioid use prior to or during pregnancy. This study aimed to determine if self-reported opioid use prior to or during pregnancy impacted breastfeeding, specifically attempt to breastfeed, duration of breastfeeding, assessment of prenatal breastfeeding intention, source of breastfeeding information, and early hospital experiences. Methods: Data from ten states (n = 10,550) that evaluated opioid use in the 2016 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey were included. Weighted univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression were calculated. The multivariate regression also included adjustment for covariates. Results: Among the overall sample, 939 participants reported opioid exposure before or during pregnancy. We found no significant difference in breastfeeding attempt. Breastfeeding for at least 6, 10, or 20 weeks was significantly less likely in participants reporting opioid exposure. Exposure correlated with lower odds of skin-to-skin contact, infant being fed in the first hour, exclusive breastfeeding in the hospital, and feeding on demand. Hospital pacifier use was associated with opioid exposure. Conclusion: While we found no difference in breastfeeding attempt, we did observe significant differences in breastfeeding duration and early hospital experiences which may represent modifiable gaps in clinical practice. Future work should focus on optimizing early hospital experiences and support when breastfeeding is clinically indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral health is an essential component of a healthy pregnancy. While most women work full-time while pregnant, research has overlooked the impact of occupational status and job loss on oral health experiences during pregnancy. To examine the impact of employment status and job loss on oral health experiences during pregnancy in the United States. Data: Data are from eight sites (Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New York State, New York City, and Wisconsin) of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for the years 2016–2020 (n = 31,362). Multiple logistic regression is used to assess the relationship between occupational status (including employment status and unwanted job loss) during pregnancy and oral health. Findings: Women who experienced an unwanted job loss in the prenatal period were at elevated risk of not having dental insurance, not receiving a dental cleaning during pregnancy, having an oral health problem, and having unmet dental care needs. Conclusion: Experiencing unwanted job loss around the time of pregnancy is an important life event that corresponds to worse oral health experiences. There is a need for greater focus on adverse life events, such as job loss, especially during pregnancy, as a mechanism for oral health issues and challenges with proper access to dental health systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite evidence of the impact of breastfeeding information on breastfeeding rates, it is unknown if information sources and impact vary by race/ethnicity, thus this study assessed race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information sources and breastfeeding. Methods: We used data from the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Race/ethnicity-stratified multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate associations between information source (e.g., family/friends) and breastfeeding rates (0 weeks/none, < 10 weeks, or ≥ 10 weeks; < 10 weeks and ≥ 10 weeks = any breastfeeding). All analyses were weighted to be nationally representative. Results: Among 5,945,018 women (weighted), 88% reported initiating breastfeeding (≥ 10 weeks = 70%). Information from family/friends (< 10 weeks: aORs = 1.58–2.14; ≥ 10 weeks: aORs = 1.63–2.64) and breastfeeding support groups (< 10 weeks: aORs = 1.31–1.76; ≥ 10 weeks: aORs = 1.42–2.77) were consistently associated with breastfeeding and duration across most racial/ethnic groups; effects were consistently smaller among Alaska Native, Black, and Hispanic women (vs White women). Over half of American Indian and one-quarter of Black women reported not breastfeeding/stopping breastfeeding due to return to school/work concerns. Conclusions: Associations between breastfeeding information source and breastfeeding rates vary across race/ethnicity. Culturally tailored breastfeeding information and support from family/friends and support groups could help reduce breastfeeding disparities. Additional measures are needed to address disparities related to concerns about return to work/school. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To propose a measure for adverse maternal experiences (AMEs) and examine if AMEs are independently associated with delivery of a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosed infant. Methods: Using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) stressful life events questions, we constructed a composite measure of AMEs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of linked Birth Certificate Data, Hospital Discharge Data and PRAMS data for 2012–2018 using the composite measure. Our analytic sample included 6358 singleton deliveries. We calculated prevalence of NAS and AMEs and prevalence odds ratio (POR) for delivery of an NAS-diagnosed infant adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, pre-pregnancy depression, prescription medicine 12 months prior to pregnancy, and smoking during pregnancy. Results: The overall prevalence of NAS in Delaware during 2012–2018 was 2.2% (95% CI 1.8–2.6); 9.5% (95% CI 8.7–10.2) of women reported AMEs. After adjustment, women with AMEs had 1.1 times greater odds (aPOR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3–3.3) to deliver a NAS-diagnosed infant as compared with women without AMEs. Conclusions: Although the cross-sectional nature of the study limits drawing any causal inferences, there are co-occurring factors that support plausibility of an association between AMEs and delivering NAS-diagnosed infants. Addressing AMEs, mental health and substance use screening and treatment as part of preconception and prenatal care may mitigate risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]