Search

We show that over the last two decades, India's effective tax rates (ETRs) have increased by 7.8 percent, which contrasts with the downward trend in ETRs for US firms documented by Dyreng et al. (2017). After controlling for changes in firm characteristics, macroeconomic factors, and tax policy changes, our findings show that ETRs increased by 0.37 percent per year during the sample period. Further, we examine the proposition that public firms are more likely to engage in non-conforming tax management than private firms. We observe a stronger upward trend in ETRs among private firms than public firms, consistent with the capital market pressure hypothesis. The permanent book-tax difference is the primary driver of the ETR trend for both private and public firms. Our findings contribute to the recent debate about the trend in ETRs by undermining concerns regarding rising corporate tax avoidance and reinforcing the argument that improved tax efficiency and economies of agglomeration in countries with large domestic markets contribute to higher ETRs. JEL Codes: G38, H25, H26, H32 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We use a novel dataset that links audit-firm and client-firm financial statement information from the U.K.'s largest audit firms to examine drivers of audit-firm profitability and its implications for audit outcomes. We first explore the determinants of audit-firm profitability and conclude that Big-4 and non-Big-4 audit firms have fundamentally different profitability structures. Big-4 firms have higher profit margins than non-Big-4 firms. Furthermore, Big-4 profitability increases with client size and complexity, while non-Big-4 profitability is higher for smaller, private-firm clients. Next, we examine the relation between audit-firm profitability and audit outcomes. Using a battery of alternative outcome measures, we find that more profitable audit firms deliver higher audit quality. In supplemental analyses we show that the positive relation between audit-firm profitability and audit outcomes is generally stronger for more influential and illiquid clients (i.e. when auditors are exposed to more litigation risk). Our inferences are robust to several endogeneity controls, such as using an instrumental variables approach, controlling for client-firm and audit-firm fixed effects, employing lead-lag and changes specifications, and assessing bias from correlated omitted variables. Our study contributes to the literature by being the first to provide insights into audit-firm profitability and examine in detail its implications for audit quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the intertemporal income-shifting behavior of private firms, as well as the level and efficiency of aggressive intertemporal income shifters' investments in the wake of corporate tax cuts. Earlier research has focused mainly on public firms. However, research into private firms is especially relevant since these companies tend to finance future growth through internal financing. Using a sample of 2,650 firm-year observations of private Spanish firms, our results thus show that private companies engaged in intertemporal income shifting to gain additional tax savings in the presence of corporate tax cuts. This was particularly observed in the presence of significant investment opportunities and timing pressures to shift income. Additionally, we provide evidence that aggressive intertemporal income shifters invested more in labor capital after tax reforms than other firms and that such investments were efficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY: We examine the value of auditor verification to small businesses when they face economic uncertainty. The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant, exogenous economic shock that immediately heightened the need for external funding for many companies. Using a sample of small, private companies from 21 countries, we examine how the receipt of an audit prior to the pandemic affects the primary type of financing companies obtain during the pandemic. We find that companies with audited financial statements available are more inclined to secure primary funding from bank loans rather than from equity contributions from existing owners or new investors. However, an audit is not associated with primary funding from government sources. We also document that businesses benefit most from an audit when information asymmetry and economic disruption are relatively high and when the supply of government liquidity support is relatively low. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M21; M42. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing on confidential Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data, we examine whether privately held corporations are more aggressive tax planners than their publicly held peers. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find no consistent evidence that private firms are more aggressive tax planners. We then examine whether private firms' tax planning differs from that of public firms more generally. We find that private firms engage in more conforming tax planning (planning that also reduces pretax accounting income). However, tests of nonconforming tax planning reveal that private firms generally engage in the same or less planning relative to their public peers. Overall, our findings cast doubt on the belief that private firms are generally more aggressive tax planners than are public firms, but confirm that they engage in more of some forms of general (i.e., conforming) planning. Data Availability: The IRS provided confidential tax information to Michele S. Mullaney pursuant to an Intragovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (IPA) agreement through the Statistics of Income (SOI) Joint Statistical Research Program (JSRP). JEL Classifications: H25; H26; K34; M41. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper investigates how private and public firms vary with respect to unconditional conservatism in financial reporting in the pre and post IFRS worlds. I consider unconditional conservatism (UC) which pre-empts the more commonly studied conditional conservatism, private firms that are differently regulated, IFRS convergence instead of the more uniform IFRS adoption and an emerging market. Using a large Indian sample of 63,000 observations across more than 15,500 firms (~41% are private) over 10 years (2011-2020), I show that private firms are less unconditionally conservative than public firms. Also, contrary to literature, IFRS convergence increases conservatism in India and reduces the conservatism gap between private and public firms. These results hold even after controlling for monitoring, governance, and group-affiliation. This adds significantly to our understanding of how the effect of uniform accounting standards on reporting choices of different firm types varies significantly by and within a context and region.

How private firms can overcome their unique governance challenges remains an important but understudied topic. Using novel data on more than 28,000 private firms in India from 1988 to 2017, we examine whether private firms can improve their survival prospects by having board interlocks with public firms and, specifically, interlocks whereby a public firm director subsequently joins the private firm's board. In our data, we found a U-shaped relationship between the number of incoming board interlocks and the probability of private firm exit. We also found that board interlocks formed by public firm directors of public firms audited by Big Four companies improve private firms' survival more than other interlocks, consistent with the notion that such interlocks improve monitoring at private firms. Overall, our study points toward the importance of considering the role of incoming board interlocks when explaining private firm survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates whether the retention of founders has a greater impact on deal prices and acquirer benefits compared with the retention of family successors or CEOs when private firms pursue a merger exit strategy. The results demonstrate that higher prices and returns can be achieved when founders remain postmerger. These findings hold up even when considering the acquirer's long‐term operating and market performance, indicating the robustness of the results. Additionally, the study reveals that the effect of founder retention is larger than that of CEO retention, and the effect of founder‐CEO retention is the largest. Furthermore, the study examines multistage investments and exits, revealing that venture capitalists can trade off the benefits of founder maturity and firm growth. This implies that founder premiums vary with the enterprise life cycle. Finally, the study investigates the mechanism behind these results, finding that venture capital backing, high‐tech industry, earnouts and stock‐for‐stock deals as moderators can significantly enhance the founder‐retention effect on acquirer benefits. This study proposes that the specific human capital and entrepreneurial spirit of founders, transcending ownership, emerge as driving forces behind this effect. Founder heterogeneity also suggests that acquirers can benefit more from founder retention when founders are innovative talents or serial entrepreneurs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synopsis The research problem This paper examined whether firms' decision to switch from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to the new Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (New UK GAAP) affects their audit fees. Motivation The New UK GAAP was introduced by the UK regulators to enhance the comparability of financial reports and to reduce the high financial reporting costs associated with IFRS. We aimed to provide evidence on whether the reduced frameworks of IFRS, like the New UK GAAP, are a more cost-effective option. Furthermore, only very few studies analyzed the impact of abandoning IFRS on audit fees, and these found inconsistent results using the public firm data. We aimed to extend the current literature by using the private firm data. The test hypotheses Our first set of hypotheses considered whether the switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP is associated with audit fees. Our second hypothesis tested whether there is a difference in any such association between larger and smaller firms. Target population We focused on the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firms that have previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. Adopted methodology We used regression analyses, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses, various matching methods for robustness, and analyses of firms' financial reports. Analyses Using the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firm data for the period 2014–2019, we examined the impact of switching from IFRS to the New UK GAAP on audit fees. The data for regression and DID analyses were obtained from the FAME database. We also downloaded the financial reports of two firms from Companies House to analyze the differences in their reports before and after the switch to the New UK GAAP. Findings We found that firms' decision to switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP significantly reduced their audit fees, with larger firms experiencing an additional reduction in their audit fees following the switch. Through examining the real examples of firms' financial reports, we found consistent evidence that firms turning away from IFRS did take advantage of the disclosure exemptions contained within the New UK GAAP, resulting in reduced disclosure, which may explain the reduced audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that using full IFRS may still be burdensome for the sampled firms that previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. The findings also imply that an accounting standard consistent with IFRS but requiring less disclosure, such as the New UK GAAP or the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities, may be welcomed by practitioners and represents a useful alternative for standard setters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper studies whether credit ratings can alleviate the hold-up problem in the loan market. We exploit a refinement of the rating information produced by a certifier that rates private bank-dependent firms in France on a vast scale. The refinement causes some firms to receive a positive rating surprise that is not due to an improvement in firm fundamentals. We show that affected firms become less reliant on lenders that have greater ability to extract informational rents. These firms receive greater and less expensive bank credit from new and less informed lenders and invest more. We deduce that credit ratings reduce the monopoly power of informed banks, helping firms to expand their access to bank credit. This paper was accepted by David Sraer, finance. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4779. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rent-seeking behavior of firms in economic society destroys the fair market order and hinders the sustainable development of the economy. In the context of the mixed-ownership reform, this study examines whether and how state ownership participation affects the rent-seeking behavior of private firms using Chinese-listed private firms from 2010 to 2019. The findings suggest that state ownership participation significantly eliminates the rent-seeking behavior of private firms. However, the eliminating effect of state ownership participation on private firms' rent-seeking behavior is weakened by high economic policy uncertainty and government intervention where private firms operate. The findings of this study enrich the characteristics and influencing factors of rent-seeking behavior of private firms, expand the literature on Chinese mixed-ownership participation, provide empirical evidence that is inconsistent with Western theoretical predictions, construct a new theory based on practices with Chinese characteristics and further reveal the characteristics of Chinese accounting practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper provides initial evidence on executive pay in small private limited liability firms in Germany. More than 80% of the firms report fewer than 50 employees. We find that executive pay increases with firm size and variable pay. We also find weak evidence that executive pay is lower in the presence of female executives, and increases with profitability. Surprisingly, variable pay is related in an inverted U-shape to total salary. Significant executive ownership (> 25%) is associated with higher compensation. Executive pay varies widely by region. Some, but not all results are in line with efficient contracting theory. In sum, we provide novel evidence on executive pay in small private firms outside the U.S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examine whether higher accounting comparability between public and private firms leads to higher value relevance of private firms' reported financial information. To help develop our hypotheses, we conduct a series of interviews with M&A valuation experts. The experts indicate that comparable accounting between public and private firms allows them to apply public firms' valuation multiples directly to private firms, which facilitates the use of private firms' financial reporting in their valuations. Using a large sample of M&A transactions with private target firms in the European Union around the mandatory adoption of IFRS by public firms, we find that private firms' reported financial information has higher value relevance when it has higher accounting comparability to that of public firms. Furthermore, we find that the impact of accounting comparability is stronger when public peer information is more precise. Our findings are consistent with higher accounting comparability facilitating a spillover of valuation information from public to private markets, which leads to greater value relevance of private firms' reported financial information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper contributes to the growing literature on earnings management in private firms by focusing on deferred taxes. This accounting treatment requires sophisticated use of accruals that provides the chance to manage earnings and net assets without affecting the tax payable. We argue that in a setting with high book-tax conformity, the small room that allegedly exists to recognise deferred taxes remains a comfortable avenue to reach reporting objectives that a tax-minimisation strategy may preclude. We use a sample of private firms operating in a credit- and tax-driven environment such as Italy to test this expectation. Our results show that private firms use deferred taxes to extract multiple financial reporting benefits that may facilitate debt contracting: smoothing earnings over time, meeting/beating historical earnings, avoiding reporting accounting losses, and managing leverage. Tax loss carryforwards are the source of deferred tax assets where the exercise of discretion becomes more critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines to what extent auditors increase financial reporting quality in a civil law private firm context. Although such context provides little incentives to focus on financial reporting quality, the signalling role remains important. Therefore, we argue that auditors will also increase the quality of the financial statements in this context but will primarily focus on the form quality of the statements (i.e., the extent to which the required disclosures are made) while the substance quality (i.e., the extent to which the financial statements faithfully represent the economic reality) might become a smaller concern. A new measure for form quality is developed, and two matched samples of 278 and 316 Belgian private firms respectively are used to test our hypotheses. Our results confirm that having an auditor significantly increases the form quality of the financial statements while the effect on substance quality is more ambiguous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the impact of market segmentation on R&D investment in transitional economy. Based on the analysis of 14,032 Chinese private firms, we find that market segmentation has an inverted U-shaped relationship with firm R&D investment, that is, private firms' innovation investment presents a trend of first increase and then decrease in relation to the deepening of market segmentation. In addition, this study explores the moderating effect of marketisation change speed (MCS), and the results indicate that MCS strengthens the inverted U-shaped relationship between market segmentation and R&D investment of private firms. Our findings provide insights into how emerging economies leverage the role of the market to better stimulate private sector investment in innovation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates whether political connections affect labor investment efficiency. We test this question in the context of China's private firms, where we find that political connections are negatively associated with labor investment efficiency. We also explore the channels through which political connections reduce labor investment efficiency and provide evidence that political connections aggravate both agency problems and information asymmetry. Further tests show that the influence of political connections is more pronounced for firms with overinvestment problems or high‐level political connections, and for firms from regions facing severe unemployment or loose anticorruption. Overall, our results are consistent with the "grabbing hand" argument that politicians destroy firm operational efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study whether firms avoid financial disclosures to preserve their owners' financial privacy. We find that firms named after their owner, for whom firm disclosure would more directly expose owner information, are more opaque. Eponymous owners prefer firm opacity when disclosure exposes sensitive owner information with social stigma, in rural and anticapitalist areas, and in insider-oriented settings with high secrecy and distrust. When firms are forced to disclose, eponymous owners more frequently change their firms' names, and new firms are less frequently named after their founding owners. These findings indicate that owner-level privacy concerns dampen firm-level disclosure incentives. Data Availability: The data used in this study are available from public sources listed in the paper. JEL Classifications: D82; L51; M41. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The world economy, and SMEs in particular, have been hit hard by the COVID-19 epidemic. SME finance issues are becoming a significant focus of policymakers and academics. This research uses private companies as a sample to analyze how COVID-19 affected SME finance. We examine critical factors such as business size, leverage, profitability, liquidity, and the influence of COVID-19. Our research shows that the pandemic has had a significant, detrimental impact on funding for small and medium-sized businesses. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have expanded their borrowing amid falling profits and cash flow. More specifically, smaller SMEs have been hit harder than their bigger counterparts. Implications for policymakers and the owners of SMEs are substantial. Governments should help small and medium-sized enterprises by providing incentives like tax credits and loan guarantees. Owners of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) should prioritize sound financial management and stability. This research sheds light on SMEs' funding difficulties in the wake of COVID-19 and highlights the need to aid such businesses as rebuild. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines how information spillovers from equity to debt markets ("equity spillovers") affect sell-side debt analysts' activities and the informativeness of their reports. To explore this relation, I compare debt analyst reports for firms without equity spillovers (private firms) to firms with equity spillovers (public firms). I find that, absent equity spillovers, analysts rely more on mandatory SEC filings to fill the information gap for private firms. This additional effort, however, reduces debt analysts' coverage of private firms overall. Conditional on coverage, the content of debt analyst reports is remarkably similar across private and public firms. Finally, I find that debt analyst reports are more informative for private firms than for public firms. Collectively, my findings shed light on the externalities created by equity spillovers and how debt market intermediaries contribute to the price discovery process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate how the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by publicly listed firms in the European Union affects peer private firms. We find that private firms' capital investment decreases significantly after the IFRS mandate, relative to public firms. Private firms also display decreased investment when benchmarked against firms relatively insulated from the impact of the IFRS mandate, but the magnitude of the effect is smaller in this case. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that mandatory IFRS reporting (combined with other reforms), while increasing public firms' financing and investment, crowds out funding for private firms. The effect is more pronounced for larger private firms and in industries where public peers have greater external financing needs. Our evidence suggests that financial reporting regulations cause shifts in resource allocation in an economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate the consequences of adopting a new accrual-based relief mechanism on private firms' borrowing capacity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Italian government implemented a temporary change in accounting rules that allowed firms to suspend up to the entire amount of their depreciation and amortisation charges. Using a sample of Italian firms from 2018 to 2021 and a difference-in-differences model, we show that the depreciation and amortisation suspension policy (DASP) adopters, compared to non-adopters, access larger loans and negotiate a lower cost of debt than in the pre-DASP period. Our results are robust to additional tests for potential endogeneity and confounding factors such as earnings management and the adoption of other accounting-based relief mechanisms. We provide evidence that accrual-based relief mechanisms have real economic effects and are effective measures to support firms in managing a systemic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, the Chinese government has continued to increase investment in private firms. However, could State-owned shareholders promote the performance of private firms? There is also a lack of direct evidence. This paper serves a useful supplement to this problem. Based on the large sample data of Chinese listed private companies, the empirical results of this paper confirm the U-shaped relationship between the shareholding ratio of State-owned shareholders and firm performance, and the U-shaped relationship will be more significant when the degree of marketization of private firms is low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose – This policy paper compares the performance of state-owned enterprise (SOEs) versus private firms in selected emerging economies in Asia, focusing on a number of performance indicators. The indicators are internationally recognized quality innovation, product and/or service innovation, financing of operations, dealing with government regulations and labor performance. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has been no such comparative study for these indicators between SOEs and private firms and across countries. Most studies of SOEs have been national case studies. As such, they give us little knowledge of how a country compares with other countries at similar stages of economic development. A cross-country comparative analysis can help us identify broader trends and patterns. Design/methodology/approach – The authors compare and discuss the performance of SOEs versus private firms in a number of emerging Asian countries, namely China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam. To do so, the authors use data from the 2018 World Bank Enterprise Survey (which is the latest available) for the period 2012–2015. The authors focus on a number of key performance indicators, namely internationally recognized quality innovation, product and/or service innovation, financing of operations, dealing with government regulations and labor performance. Findings – The comparative analysis uncovers some interesting differences between the two types of firms. For example, somewhat surprisingly, SOEs tend to innovate more than private firms. However, the single most significant pattern the authors find is that in middle-income Asia both types of firms face formidable challenges with respect to doing business – e.g. scarcity of relevant training programs for employees. Therefore, the priority of policymakers must be to improve the overall business environment for all firms, regardless of their ownership structure. Research limitations/implications – The nature of this paper is a policy paper. This is because the data used in this study is survey data, conducted every four–five years (or more) for each country in the study and available for very few countries. As the data are not available for a continuous period of time, The authors could not conduct empirical research for this topic and thus made it a policy paper that presents a comparison across Asian countries as case studies. Originality/value – The five selected Asian countries are interesting case studies for a comparative analysis since they are middle-income countries where SOEs play a significant role in the economy. Furthermore, state ownership is an important institutional dimension in emerging markets, and strong ties with the government can influence the performance of SOEs through various market and non-market channels. Despite the potential importance of the research theme, there is very little existing research on cross-country comparisons of the performance of SOEs vis-à-vis private firms. This could be explained by scarce data availability. With this in mind, the study attempts to shed some light on SOEs' performance and add to the rather limited literature.

This study investigates the role of auditor choice (Big 4/Non‐Big 4) in debt financing for private and public firms. We find private firms have less access to debt than public firms, and Big 4 auditors support debt raising in both private and public firms. Consistent with private firms facing greater information asymmetry, Big 4 auditors are more important for debt raising in private firms than in public firms. The benefit of appointing Big 4 auditors for private firms' debt raising is greater in the opaque information environment of the global financial crisis. It is also greater when firms are smaller, younger, or have poorer financial reporting quality. We also find evidence consistent with Big 4 auditors mitigating agency conflicts and enhancing debt raising when ownership concentration is higher in private firms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examine the relation between auditor size and audit quality for a sample of U.K. private firms. Private firms prioritize tax considerations over reducing information asymmetry in their financial reporting. We find that Big 4's private clients exhibit higher levels of discretionary accruals and lower precision of accrual estimates than non-Big 4's private clients. Although Big 4 auditors are less tolerant of income-increasing earnings management, they leave more room for downward earnings management and their private clients are able to engage in greater tax avoidance. These results are stronger for standalone firms than for business groups as the latter's greater demand for stakeholder communication motivates Big 4 auditors to increase audit quality. Collectively, our evidence suggests that Big 4 auditors adjust audit quality in a more competitive segment of the audit market where client firms generally perceive the benefit from tax minimization to outweigh the cost of reduced earnings informativeness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the association between economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and private firms' corporate donations. Based on resource constraints and the conservation of resources (COR) theory, we argue that private firms are constantly facing resource constraints and their resource conservation motive becomes apparent when EPU is heightened. Therefore, we expect that corporate donations are negatively related to EPU. Using audited corporate donations from 48,903 private firms in Korea during 2002–2019, we find that private firms' donations are negatively related to EPU. We find that private firms operating in more competitive conditions increase their donations, but this positive association between market competition and donations is moderated by EPU. We find that private firms' donations increased when the progressive party is in power, but this positive relationship is also moderated by EPU. Our results suggest that firms reduce their level of corporate giving to conserve resources as a precautionary saving motive when they face higher EPU. Our paper contributes to the strand of literature on corporate donations and EPU by providing evidence that EPU significantly affects private firms' donations. We also find that firms' strategic motives and political pressure to engage in corporate donations are moderated by EPU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study how public firm misvaluation affects private peer firm investments. An economic competition hypothesis predicts a negative relation because misvaluation-induced new investment by public firms crowds out investment by private peers that share common input or output markets. An alternative shared sentiment hypothesis predicts a positive relation because private firm stakeholders share in the sentiment associated with misvaluation in public markets. Misvaluation is proxied using both the price-to-fundamental ratio and an exogenous instrument obtained from mutual fund flows. The evidence is consistent with the shared sentiment hypothesis, and robust to alternative treatments for growth opportunities. Private firms finance misvaluation-induced investment primarily internally or externally with debt, not equity. Finally, misvaluation-induced investment increases future return on investment for private firms, in contrast with public firms. Overall, these findings suggest that overvaluation in public markets increases private firm investments and has beneficial effects on private firm investments by relaxing financing constraints.

Although labor costs are crucial inputs in corporate production, only little is known about their effects on corporate tax avoidance. Using a large dataset of industrial firms in China, we introduce a geographic information system technique that considers the discontinuities of minimum wage at county borders to identify the causal effect of labor costs on tax avoidance. We present strong evidence that minimum wage hikes significantly reduce the sensitivity of firms' imputed profits to their reported profits, which indicates that firms improve their tax avoidance activities. Our findings are particularly pronounced for non-state-owned firms, firms with financial constraints, firms with low average wage, firms in industries with high labor intensity, and firms located in regions with high government intervention and low fiscal deficit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study we investigate whether and to what extent social capital may affect regional innovation by focusing on private firms in the United States. We document that regional social capital is positively associated with the quantity, quality and novelty of county-level innovation by private firms. In addition, we find that the positive relation between social capital and regional innovation is more prominent in counties with a lower supply of financial capital. We also report that social capital is complementary to investments in research and development to produce inventive outcomes in local areas. Using a spatial Durbin model, we provide evidence that regional social capital has significant spillover effects in boosting the innovation activities of neighbouring counties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long-time development of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has sparked debates between scholars who emphasize a state-led approach and those who see decentralized project operations initiated by profit motives. This study bridges this divide by examining the practices of Chinese firms within the BRI, shedding light on state-business relations. Focusing on Kenya, a pivotal maritime BRI location, it explores Chinese state-firm relational dynamics in infrastructure, trade, and manufacturing BRI projects. The findings reveal that Chinese firms in Kenya, private or state-owned, play a partial strategic role. The Chinese state selects activities crucial for establishing a mutually beneficial narrative and guides firms through official visits and awards to build positive reputations. However, firms remain commercially oriented and seek state assistance based on business needs. Private and state-owned Chinese firms in Kenya share a certain level of similarity in accessing state support, both financial and operational. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study provides a guide to accounting research on private firms with an emphasis on the European setting. We start by providing an overview of private firm financial reporting regulation in Europe and indicate how this institutional framework can be used to identify promising research settings that in part generalise beyond the European setting. Next, we discuss the availability of private firm accounting data and the underlying data generating process that involves private firms' original reports, governmental and private data aggregators, and commercial data providers. We show how this process generates insightful data, but at the same time causes complex sample selection issues that researchers should take into account when assessing prior findings and developing new research projects. Finally, we identify potential areas of future work by reviewing the extant literature along the three main motivations for conducting private firm work: (i) to learn more about private firms per se, (ii) to learn more about what distinguishes private firms from public firms, and (iii) to obtain insights from private firms that generalise across all firms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on Chinese industrial firms’ data, this study found that state capital injection weakened the technological progress and management efficiency of private firms, which led to a reduction in enterprises’ total factor productivity. State capital injection also increased the labor cost and investment in fixed assets, and lowered the profitability of firms. Furthermore, the state capital did not have a significant negative impact on firms in technology-intensive and monopoly industries. This study has shed some lights on the reform of the state-owned assets management system and the development of a mixed ownership economy.

Using the data provided by the World Bank's Enterprise Surveys, this paper shows that firms with higher exposure to informal competition are more likely to innovate than firms with lower exposure to informal competition in 121 developing countries. Our results hold in various sub-samples based on the size of firms and on the location of firms (Europe and Central Asia, Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Middle East and North Africa). We argue that formal firms use innovation as a tool to protect and sustain their competitive advantage vis-à-vis informal firms. The findings of this paper also show that the firm-level business environment and the country-level economic environment affect the sensitivity of innovation to informal competition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2014, all larger Swedish private firms were required, at short notice, to adopt a new reporting standard (K3) based on IFRS for SMEs (2009 version). Using this shock to the reporting environment, we study the effects of the new reporting standard on groups' financial reporting properties and cost of debt financing. We find that, following the introduction of K3, private groups exhibit reporting changes consistent with improved accounting quality; their financial statement comparability increases; and their cost of debt declines. Our results suggest that the cost-of-debt decline is related to changes in accounting numbers that are imputed to lending models. Our findings add to the literature on factors shaping private firms' financial reporting and inform the ongoing discussion on accounting regulation for private firms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following calls for further research, this study evaluates the determinants and motives behind private companies' decision to capitalise development costs by using mixed methods. While prior literature and expert interviews indicate initially that private firms may be motivated opportunistically, subsequent archival analyses show that development costs are capitalised to meet benchmarks and ameliorate poor profitability. Additionally, interview evidence emphasises that debt covenant violation avoidance and increasing merger and acquisition (M&A) values are important drivers for capitalisation, whereas management compensation schemes do not seem to influence their accounting policy. Moreover, findings imply a negative association between firm size and the capitalisation of development costs. Expert interview evidence indicates that smaller companies are more likely to have financing needs, suggesting that capitalisation is employed to signal future economic benefits to investors. Conversely, the motivation for larger companies which are more likely to expense may be grounded on risk avoidance from future impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]