Search

Observations with missing data are a typical predicament in the context of multivariate statistical process control (MSPC). When process control is performed using a T2 control chart of the principal components (PCs), several score imputation methods have been proposed. Some of these lead to estimators with good properties. However, there are no detailed studies pertaining the performance of Phase II Hotelling's T2 and squared prediction error (SPE) charts when such imputation methods are used. In this paper, a simulation study was conducted to assess the consequences of the estimation of incomplete observations using score imputation methods on T2 and SPE control charts. The study involves several scenarios that combine different correlation structures for the PCA model, methods of score estimation, percentages of missing data and patterns of incomplete information. Results show that the charts' standard control limits are adequate only for small percentages of missing values and that their average run lengths (ARLs) tend to be larger than expected in out‐of‐control situations. To illustrate the conclusions of the study, we present two examples. Our findings lead us to suggest a modification that may result in an improvement in the performance of the T2 and SPE control charts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current industrial processes are sophisticated enough to be tied to only one quality variable to describe the process result. Instead, many process variables need to be analyze together to assess the process performance. In particular, multivariate process capability analysis (MPCIs) has been the focus of study during the last few decades, during which many authors proposed alternatives to build the indices. These measures are extremely attractive to people in charge of industrial processes, because they provide a single measure that summarizes the whole process performance regarding its specifications. In most practical applications, these indices are estimated from sampling information collected by measuring the variables of interest on the process outcome. This activity introduces an additional source of variation to data, that needs to be considered, regarding its effect on the properties of the indices. Unfortunately, this problem has received scarce attention, at least in the multivariate domain. In this paper, we study how the presence of measurement errors affects the properties of one of the MPCIs recommended in previous researches. The results indicate that even little measurement errors can induce distortions on the index value, leading to wrong conclusions about the process performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multivariate capability analysis has been the focus of study in recent years, during which many authors have proposed different multivariate capability indices. In the operative context, capability indices are used as measures of the ability of the process to operate according to specifications. Because the numerical value of the index is used to conclude about the capability of the process, it is essential to bear in mind that almost always that value is obtained from a sample of process units. Therefore, it is really necessary to know the properties that the indices have when they are calculated on sampling information, in order to assess the goodness of the inferences made from them. In this work, we conduct a simulation study to investigate distributional properties of two existing indices: NMCpm index based on ratio of volumes and Mp2 index based on principal component analysis. We analyze the relative bias and the mean square error of the estimators of the indices, and we also obtain their empirical distributions that are used to estimate the probability that the indices classify correctly a process as capable or as incapable. The results allow us to recommend the use of one of these indices, as it has shown better properties. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the context of process capability analysis, the results of most processes are dominated by two or even more quality characteristics, so that the assessment of process capability requires that all of them are considered simultaneously. In recent years, many researchers have developed different alternatives of multivariate capability indices using different approaches of construction. In this paper, four of them are compared through the study of their ability to correctly distinguish capable processes from incapable processes under a diversity of simulated scenarios, defining suitable minimum desirable values that allow to decide whether the process meets or does not meet specifications. In this sense, properties analyzed can be seen as sensitivity and specificity, assuming that a measure is sensitive if it can detect the lack of capability when it actually exists and specific if it correctly identifies capable processes. Two indices based on ratios of regions and two based on the principal component analysis have been selected for the study. The scenarios take into account several joint distributions for the quality variables, normal and non-normal, several numbers of variables, and different levels of correlation between them, covering a wide range of possible situations. The results showed that one of the indices has better properties across most scenarios, leading to right conclusions about the state of capability of processes and making it a recommendable option for its use in real-world practice. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]