1. Comparison of a New Intranasal Naloxone Formulation to Intramuscular Naloxone: Results from Hypothesis‐generating Small Clinical Studies
- Author
-
Gufford, BT, Ainslie, GR, White, JR, Layton, ME, Padowski, JM, Pollack, GM, and Paine, MF
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Time Factors ,Naloxone ,Research ,Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ,Articles ,Miosis ,Injections, Intramuscular ,Article ,Healthy Volunteers ,Analgesics, Opioid ,Young Adult ,Area Under Curve ,Humans ,Administration, Intravenous ,Female ,Alfentanil ,Administration, Intranasal - Abstract
Easy‐to‐use naloxone formulations are needed to help address the opioid overdose epidemic. The pharmacokinetics of i.v., i.m., and a new i.n. naloxone formulation (2 mg) were compared in six healthy volunteers. Relative to i.m. naloxone, geometric mean (90% confidence interval [CI]) absolute bioavailability of i.n. naloxone was modestly lower (55%; 90% CI, 43–70% vs. 41%; 90% CI, 27–62%), whereas average (±SE) mean absorption time was substantially shorter (74 ± 8.8 vs. 6.7 ± 4.9 min). The opioid‐attenuating effects of i.n. naloxone were compared with i.m. naloxone (2 mg) after administration of oral alfentanil (4 mg) to a separate group of six healthy volunteers pretreated with 240 mL of water or grapefruit juice. The i.m. and i.n. naloxone attenuated miosis by similar extents after water (40 ± 15 vs. 41 ± 21 h*%) and grapefruit juice (49 ± 18 vs. 50 ± 22 h*%) pretreatment. Results merit further testing of this new naloxone formulation.
- Published
- 2017