Search

Le Fort II and III procedures have generally been performed for syndromic craniosynostosis with midfacial hypoplasia and skeletal class III malocclusion. However, some patients have midfacial hypoplasia without malocclusion. Perinasal osteotomy was performed with distraction osteogenesis to move the midface forward in 2 patients (a 17-year old female patient with Crouzon-like disease and a 15-year-old female patient with Antely-Bixler syndrome) with mild midface hypoplasia without malocclusion. The success of the procedure was assured by 3 features: the intermaxillary sutures were fixed by a mini metal plate to prevent separation during distraction; the distraction wires were fixed through the bone of the piriform aperture with the mini metal plates to prevent the wires from coming off; and the osteotomy line was designed in front of the palatomaxillary suture to avoid suture damage. These were expected to secure the procedure. Perinasal osteotomy with distraction osteogenesis is considered one of the recommended procedures for mild midfacial hypoplasia as seen in mild syndromic craniosynostosis without malocclusion.

In human fetuses, the palatine process of the maxilla is attached to the inferior aspect of the horizontal plate of the palatine bone (HPPB). The fetal palatomaxillary suture is so long that it extends along the anteroposterior axis rather than along the transverse axis. The double layered bony palate disappears in childhood and the transverse suture is formed. To better understand the development of the double layered bone palate, we examined histological sections obtained from 25 fetuses of gestational age 9-11, 16-18 and 30 weeks. The double layered palate was seen in all of the specimens examined. Inferior angulation of the posterior end of the HPPB was evident at 9-11 weeks, but the initial palatine aponeurosis did not attach to the angulation but to a slightly anterior site. Both the maxilla and the HPPB were tightly attached to the vomer at 16-18 weeks. In both bones, bilateral plates met at the midline. The palatomaxillary suture was filled with short, randomly arranged collagen fibers. The nasal end of the suture was covered by a tight periosteum. Immunohistochemical examination of 3 fetuses at 16-18 weeks showed: 1) no expression of versican, tenascin-c or type II collagen in the suture; 2) few mitotic cells positive for proliferating cell nuclear antigen; 3) no or few CD34-positive developing vessels; and 4) no CD68-positive macrophages. These findings suggested that the fetal palatomaxillary suture was inactive for reconstruction and growth and that soft palate muscles likely did not contribute to the development of the double layered configuration.

A series of experimental studies on sutural expansion osteogenesis for management of the bony-tissue defect in cleft palate repair was performed between 1995 and 1997. Forty-five young dogs in weaning were used in four experiments that were divided into two parts. Part I probed the possibility of closing the surgically constructed hard palate cleft not only with mucoperiosteum but also with bony tissue by the technique of sutural expansion of lateral palatine sutures. Part II explored the possibility of pushing the palatine bone posteriorly and advancing the maxillary segment anteriorly by transverse palatine suture expansion. In Part I, a ring-shaped suture expander made of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy was used to expand the lateral suture of palatine bones. Expansion forces of 200 G, 360 G, and 480 G were used for the first experiment. A force of 360 G was chosen for two other experiments; this force is equivalent to the distraction rate of 0.5 mm per day of a jackscrew device. The ring-shaped suture expander was opened and its two feet were fixed in the medial sides of residual horizontal plates of the palatine bones immediately after a hard palate cleft was constructed surgically under endotracheal general anesthesia. At the eighth postoperative day, under the traction of 360 G, the two sides of the 8-mm-wide hard palate cleft were brought into contact with each other, and 8 or 9 days later the closed palatal cleft had healed completely with mucosal tissue. This experiment was repeated twice and yielded the same results. Sutural expansion osteogenesis was evaluated physically, fluorescently, histologically, and ultrastructurally to examine the deposition of the regenerated bone in the suture areas. Additionally, the influence of sutural expansion osteogenesis of the palatal bones on other facial bones was also studied cephalometrically. In Part II, a bow-shaped suture expander made of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy was applied to expand either the left or the right side of the transverse palatal suture of each of the experimental dogs. At the postoperative week 4 to 6, the maxillary segment was moved forward 5 to 6 mm on the expanded side, and the palatal bone was pushed backward 5 mm. The changes of bone position were assessed radiographically and cephalometrically. Tissue response of circum-maxillary sutures was examined histologically. These experiments led to the following conclusions: (1) Bony closure of the surgically constructed hard palate cleft with a ring-shaped suture expander made of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy is possible. (2) Anterior advancement of the maxillary segment and posterior lengthening of the hard palate using a bow-shaped suture expander made of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy applied at the palatomaxillary suture (transverse palatal suture) of the hard palate are also possible. Thus, in humans, a new approach for cleft palate repair may be a worthwhile investigation.