Search

ObjectiveVaccines against antigens expressed on adenomas could prevent new adenoma formation. We assessed whether a MUC1 peptide vaccine produces an immune response and prevents subsequent colonic adenoma formation.DesignMulticenter, double blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial in individuals age 40-70 with diagnosis of an advanced adenoma ≤1 year from randomization. Vaccine was administered at 0, 2, and 10 weeks with a booster injection at week 53. Adenoma recurrence was assessed ≥1 year from randomization. The primary endpoint was vaccine immunogenicity at 12 weeks defined by anti-MUC1 ratio ≥2.0.Results53 participants received the MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. 13/52 (25%) of MUC1 vaccine recipients had a ≥2-fold increase in MUC1 IgG (range 2.9-17.3) at week 12 vs. 0/50 placebo recipients (1-sided Fisher’s exact PConclusionAn immune response was observed only in vaccine recipients. Overall adenoma recurrence was not different than placebo, but a 38% absolute reduction in adenoma recurrence was observed in immune responders.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134925.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02134925Key PointsWhat is already knownAntigens expressed on colonic adenomas are potential targets for immunopreventive vaccines. An effective vaccine could prevent subsequent adenoma formation.What this Study AddsIn this multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, MUC1 vaccine recipients developed an immune response. Overall adenoma recurrence was not different than placebo, but a 38% absolute reduction in adenoma recurrence was observed in immune responders.How this study might affect research, practice or policyVaccine immunoprevention is a potential new frontier to colorectal cancer prevention.

Purpose:To assess whether MUC1 peptide vaccine produces an immune response and prevents subsequent colon adenoma formation.Patients and Methods:Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial in individuals age 40 to 70 with diagnosis of an advanced adenoma ≤1 year from randomization. Vaccine was administered at 0, 2, and 10 weeks with a booster injection at week 53. Adenoma recurrence was assessed ≥1 year from randomization. The primary endpoint was vaccine immunogenicity at 12 weeks defined by anti-MUC1 ratio ≥2.0.Results:Fifty-three participants received the MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Thirteen of 52 (25%) MUC1 vaccine recipients had a ≥2-fold increase in MUC1 IgG (range, 2.9–17.3) at week 12 versus 0/50 placebo recipients (one-sided Fisher exact P < 0.0001). Of 13 responders at week 12, 11 (84.6%) responded to a booster injection at week 52 with a ≥2-fold increase in MUC1 IgG measured at week 55. Recurrent adenoma was observed in 31 of 47 (66.0%) in the placebo group versus 27 of 48 (56.3%) in the MUC1 group [adjusted relative risk (aRR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60–1.14; P = 0.25]. Adenoma recurrence occurred in 3/11 (27.3%) immune responders at week 12 and week 55 (aRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15–1.11; P = 0.08 compared with placebo). There was no difference in serious adverse events.Conclusions:An immune response was observed only in vaccine recipients. Adenoma recurrence was not different than placebo, but a 38% absolute reduction in adenoma recurrence compared with placebo was observed in participants who had an immune response at week 12 and with the booster injection.

Background Information on Advanced Adenoma

supplementary methods: Detailed laboratory methods

Endpoint titers of plasma antibodies at week 12 amongst vaccine responders

Background: Smoking is the most common etiology for lung cancer and smoking cessation does not eliminate the risk. An emerging area of interest for risk reduction is immunoprevention. MUC1 glycoprotein is aberrantly expressed in adenocarcinomas, including lung cancer and their premalignant lesions. MUC1 vaccine in the premalignant or high-risk setting may be effective in halting neoplastic development and progression. Trial design: Through the NCI-funded Cancer Prevention Network (CPN), we conducted a two-center pilot trial to evaluate immunogenicity of the MUC1 vaccine (assessed at 12 weeks), and safety (assessed at up to 24 weeks) in current and former heavy smokers. 87 participants were screened in order to have at least 40 evaluable for baseline and 12-week immunogenicity assessments. Smoking history of ≥30 pack-years and either current (still smoking or quit < 1 year prior to pre-registration) or former smoker (quit 1-15 years prior to pre-registration); ages 55-80 years; ECOG performance status ≤1; CT scan of the chest done ≤ 6 months prior to pre-registration showing either negative findings (no nodules) or solid or part-solid nodules < 6 mm in size (consistent with < 1% probability of malignancy, Lung-RADs Version 1.0). Exclusion criteria were standard for lung cancer screening. Methods: MUC1 peptide plus polyICLC adjuvant (Hiltonol) vaccine was given at week 0, 2 and 10. Blood was collected for safety tests and immune assays pre and 2 weeks post each vaccine, and at week 24. Anti-MUC1 IgG titer was evaluated by ELISA. Based on previous studies of this vaccine, 40 evaluable participants would provide 96% power to detect immune response rate of 15% versus 40%, using a 2-sided test of proportions with type I error rate of 0.05. PBMC were assayed for the presence of regulatory T cells (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) (secondary endpoint). Circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and hsCRP were evaluated using commercially available tests (exploratory endpoint). AEs and toxicities were monitored for up to 24 weeks from the first vaccine. Results: 87 individuals were screened and 50 registered. 45 completed the study, 26 current and 19 former smokers (time since last smoked: average 7.8 years; 11 months -13 years). The vaccine was well-tolerated with injection site reactions being the most common AE. Immune response to the vaccine was lower than expected, with 2 current and 2 former smokers developing anti-MUC1 IgG titers ≥2 fold higher at week 12 over baseline (10%). We found high circulating levels of MDSCs in PBMC of both current and former smokers and very low or no serum cytokines. Conclusions: A preventative vaccine trial was feasible in individuals at high risk for lung cancer. However, we discovered a high level of immune suppression, previously documented only in advanced lung cancer. Mitigating the development of lung cancer in heavy smokers through vaccine administration may be limited by related immunosuppression. Citation Format: Olivera J. Finn, Julie Ward, Tami Krpata, Samantha Fatis, John McKolanis, Jia Xue, Pamela Beatty, Camille Jacqueline, Sharon Kaufman, Colleen Akerley, April Felt, Karrie Fursa, Anne Holland, Liz S. Ambulay, Nathan Foster, Ryan McMurray, Carrie Strand, Andres M. Salazar, Lisa Bengtson, Eva Szabo, Paul Limburg, Malgorzata Wojtowicz, David E. Midthun, Arjun Pennathur. A pilot study of a MUC1 vaccine in current and former smokers at high risk for lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr PR002.

Recent work from our lab showed that in a colon cancer prevention trial of a tumor antigen MUC1 vaccine in patients with premalignant colon adenomas, those who did not make anti-MUC1 IgG, had higher pre-vaccination levels of circulating MDSC compared to vaccine responders. This was the first observation of increased MDSC in premalignancy. MDSC in premalignancy have not been compared to MDSC in cancer and our hypothesis is that there might be differences in the composition of various MDSC subpopulation and their immunosuppressive functions due to the shorter time of exposure to disease and differences in the disease microenvironment. We are testing this hypothesis on two cohorts of patient samples, premalignant and malignant colon and pancreas. In both cohorts we saw an increase in MDSC in premalignant and malignant disease over healthy controls. The colon premalignant group could be divided into MDSChighAnti-MUC1 IgGlow and MDSClowAnti-MUC1 IgGhigh confirming our previous observations that MDSC are impeding anti-MUC1 immune response in premalignancy as well therefore potentially facilitating progression to cancer. The pancreas cohort also showed increase in MDSC in patients with pancreatic cysts (IPMN), precursors to pancreatic cancer, as well as their suppression of anti-tumor immunity. Furthermore, we found increased levels of PGE2 and its metabolite in patients’ serum from both cohorts, which is closely related to MDSC proliferation and mechanism of suppression. While we do not see much difference in the MDSC phenotype and subpopulation composition, the immunosuppressive capacity of tumor MDSC appears to be greater. We are currently testing this observation in vitro in T cell suppression assays.

It has been previously described that viral infection and inflammatory events induced abnormal expression and specific antibodies to tumor associated antigens (TAA). We hypothesize therefore that normal cellular molecules that undergo changes following viral infections generate an immune memory response that participates in tumor immunosurveillance. We are testing this hypothesis by infecting C57BL/6 mice with influenza virus and examining the post infection antibody repertoire for newly generated antibodies that might recognize TAA in Lewis Lung Carcinoma (3LL). We also aim to identify specific molecules most significantly associated with tumor protection. Pre- and post-infection sera were used to immunoprecipitate proteins from the whole cell 3LL tumor lysate. The immunoprecipitated proteins were be subjected to Difference In-Gel Electrophoresis (DiGE) to detect proteins uniquely precipitated by post-infection sera. The selected spots were removed from the gels and analyzed by mass spectrometry. We identified the protein content of 32 new spots precipitated by post-infection serum. Many of these proteins are involved in cytoskeletal and metabolic processes. To start examining their expression on normal, infected or transformed cells, as well as their immunogenicity, we selected the first group of molecules based on previous reports implicating them in anti-tumor immunity. They are: enolase, alpha-actinin-4, 14-3-3 protein sigma, GAPDH, Histone H4, HSP70, and HSP90.