Search

Objective: Quantitative sensory testing is widely used in clinical and research settings to assess the sensory functions of healthy subjects and patients. It is of importance to establish normative values in a healthy population to provide reference for studies involving patients. Given the absence of normative values for pain thresholds in Taiwan, the aim of this study was to report the normative values for future reference in the Taiwanese population and compare the differences between male and female participants. Methods: Healthy adults without any chronic or acute pain condition were recruited. The pain thresholds were assessed over the cephalic (supraorbital area and masseter muscle) and extracephalic (medio‐volar forearm and thenar eminence) areas. The heat, cold, mechanical punctate, and pressure pain thresholds were measured with a standardized protocol. Comparisons between male and female participants were performed. Results: One hundred and thirty healthy participants (55 males: 30.4 ± 7.4 years; 75 females: 30.5 ± 8.1 years) finished the assessments. Male participants were less sensitive to mechanical stimuli, including pressure over masseter muscle (male vs. female: 178.5 ± 56.7 vs. 156.6 ± 58.4 kPa, p =.034) and punctate over medio‐volar forearm (male vs. female: 116.4 ± 45.2 vs. 98.7 ± 65.4 g, p =.011), compared to female participants. However, female participants were less sensitive to cold stimuli, indicated by lower cold pain thresholds over the supraorbital area (male vs. female: 18.6 ± 8.4 vs. 13.6 ± 9.3°C, p =.004), compared to male participants. No significant differences were found between sexes in other pain threshold parameters. Conclusions: We provided the normative values of healthy male and female adults in Taiwan. This information is crucial for comparison in future pain‐related studies to identify potential hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia of tested subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Preventive treatment is crucial for patients with chronic migraine (CM). This study explored the association between resting-state cortical oscillations and 3-month treatment outcome in patients with CM. Treatment-naïve patients with CM were recruited with their demographic data, psychosocial data, and headache profiles as well as the healthy controls (HCs). Resting-state cortical activities were recorded using an electroencephalogram and analysed using source-based and electrode-based spectral power method. The regions of interest were the bilateral primary somatosensory (S1) and visual (V1) cortices. After 3-month treatment with flunarizine, patients with CM were categorized into responders and nonresponders. Demographic, clinical, and electroencephalogram data from 72 patients with CM and 50 HCs were analysed. Elevated anxiety, depression, and stress were observed in patients with CM. Theta power in bilateral S1 and alpha and gamma powers in the right S1 increased in patients with CM. Nonresponders (n = 34) exhibited larger alpha powers in bilateral V1 than those in responders (n = 38). Alpha powers also exhibited significant correlations with changes of monthly headache days. Notably, in responders and nonresponders, occipital alpha powers did not differ at baseline and in the third month. In conclusion, patients with CM who were not responsive to preventive treatment were associated with augmented resting-state occipital alpha activity. Moreover, changes in migraine attack frequency were associated with baseline occipital alpha power. However, the prognostic feature of visual alpha oscillation seems to be inherent because it is not altered by flunarizine treatment. These findings may be useful for developing personalised migraine treatment plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sensory gating, a habituation-related but more basic protective mechanism against brain sensory overload, is altered in patients with migraine and linked to headache severity. This study investigated whether somatosensory (SI) gating responses determined 3-months treatment outcomes in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). A 306-channel magnetoencephalography (MEG) with paired-pulse stimulation paradigm was used to record their neuromagnetic responses. To calculate the peak amplitude and latency and compute the gating ratios (second vs. first amplitude), the first and second responses to the paired stimuli from the primary somatosensory cortex were obtained. All patients were assigned to subgroups labeled good or poor according to their headache frequency at baseline compared with at the third month of treatment. The gating ratio in the CM group (n = 37) was significantly different between those identified as good and poor (p = 0.009). In the EM group (n = 30), the latency in the second response differed by treatment outcomes (p = 0.007). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve for the CM and EM groups were 0.737 and 0.761, respectively. Somatosensory gating responses were associated with treatment outcomes in patients with migraine; future studies with large patient samples are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In precision medicine and clinical pain management, the creation of quantitative, objective indicators to assess somatosensory sensitivity was essential. This study proposed a fusion approach for decoding human somatosensory sensitivity, which combined multimodal (quantitative sensory test and neurophysiology) features to classify the dataset on individual somatosensory sensitivity and reveal distinct types of brain activation patterns. Sixty healthy participants took part in the experiment on somatosensory sensitivity that implemented cold, heat, mechanical punctate, and pressure stimuli, and the resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was collected using BrainVision. The quantitative sensory testing (QST) scores of the participants were clustered using the unsupervised k-means algorithm into four subgroups: generally hypersensitive (HS), generally non-sensitive (NS), predominantly thermally sensitive (TS), and predominantly mechanically sensitive (MS). Furthermore, two types of power spectral density (PSD), band-based PSD (BB-PSD) and frequency-based PSD (FB-PSD), and two types of inter-electrode connectivity (IEC), band-based connectivity (BBC) and frequency-based connectivity (FBC), derived from resting-state EEG were subjected to feature selection with a proposed prior-compared minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance (PCMRMR) protocol. Their effectiveness was then tested by the supervised classification tasks using support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), and Gaussian classifier (GC). Brain networks of four somatosensory types were revealed by decoding fused multimodal data, namely type-averaged connectivity. The data from sixty healthy individuals were divided into training (n = 59) and validation (n = 1) datasets according to leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) criteria. The FBC was identified, which can serve as better brain signatures than BB-PSD, FB-PSD, and BBC to classify subjects as HS, NS, TS, or MS groups. Using the SVM, kNN, RF, and GC models, the best accuracy of 87% was obtained when classifying participants into HS, NS, TS, or MS groups. Moreover, the brain networks were decoded from HS, NS, TS, and MS groups by decoding the type-averaged connectivity fused from somatosensory phenotypes and selected FBC. It indicated that quantified multi-parameter somatosensory sensitivity could be achieved with acceptable accuracy, leading to considerable possibilities for using objective pain perception evaluation in clinical practice.

Migraine and epilepsy share in many ways with regard to their clinical presentation and pathophysiological mechanisms. A state of central hyper-excitability or hyper-responsivity is fundamental in their pathophysiology. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have long been used for migraine prevention, other than for seizure control. Evidence from numerous clinical trials has well demonstrated the therapeutic effects of some of the AEDs in this regard. In this paper, we will first discuss the clinical similarity between migraine and epilepsy. Then, to address the rationale of AEDs usage in migraine prevention, we focus on those electrophysiological studies conducted in patients with migraine demonstrating evidence of central hyper-excitability or hyper-responsivity. Although controversies remain, three common findings are derived from the literature: (1) cortical hyper-excitability, (2) impaired intra-cortical inhibition or increased intra-cortical facilitation, and (3) dis-habituation (hyper-responsivity). Each single feature may actually represent one of the different manifestations derived from an overall central excitation/inhibition imbalance. Finally, we review those studies addressing the therapeutic effects of AEDs and the associated alteration in central excitability. These studies provided direct evidence that effective prevention by AEDs is associated with the restoration of excitation/inhibition imbalance., (© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)