Search

Aim: To explore the International Network for Child and Family Centred Care (INCFCC) members' experiences and views on the long-term impact of COVID-19 on the nursing workforce., Background: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. While some countries adopted a herd immunity approach, others imposed stricter measures to reduce the transmission of the virus. Hospitals in some countries faced an avalanche of extremely sick admissions, whereas others experienced an early surge in cases or were able to control the spread., Design: Discursive paper., Methods: A web-based survey was e-mailed to 63 INCFCC members from 28 March to 30 April 2022, as an invitation to share their experience concerning the long-term impact of COVID-19 on their role as a nurse educator, clinician or researcher., Results: Sixteen members responded, and the responses were grouped under the themes stress and anxiety, safe staffing and pay, doing things differently, impact on research, impact on teaching and learning, impact on clinical practice, nursing made visible and lessons for the future., Conclusion: The INCFCC members provided their views and highlighted the impact on their role in nursing education, administration, research and/or practice. This discussion of international perspectives on the similarities and differences imposed by COVID-19 found that the impact was wide-ranging and prolonged. The overarching theme revealed the resilience of the participating members in the face of COVID-19., Relevance to Clinical Practice: This study highlights the importance of all areas of nursing, be it in academia or in clinical practice, to work together to learn from the present and to plan for the future. Future work should focus on supporting organizational and personal resiliency and effective interventions to support the nursing workforce both during a disaster and in the recovery phase. Nursing workforce resilience in the face of COVID-19., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The second stage of lactation with copious milk production occurs after birth regardless of the infant's survival. Previous research indicates that milk donation following a perinatal loss may help some bereaved mothers come to terms with their loss. The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of women choosing to continue to express milk after a perinatal loss specifically for donation to a nonprofit milk bank governed by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA). Materials and Methods: Participants were recruited through HMBANA's milk bank directors' listserv, their bereavement committee, and through their website. Participants were eligible if they donated to an HMBANA milk bank and specifically continued to pump milk for the purpose of milk donation following a perinatal loss. Qualitative interviews were conducted with each participant using a secured web-based platform. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently using qualitative content analysis until there was acknowledged informational redundancy. Participants' demographic and lactation data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Over 10 months, 21 participants were interviewed. Donating after perinatal loss has been described as a positive, valuable, and nurturing experience. Diminished grieving, enhanced connection to the infant, establishment of legacy, and creation of a positive from a negative are highlighted in several themes that illuminate the phenomena of bereaved donation. Discussion: The findings of this research are consistent with published literature, but in this study, two subgroups were formed. This enabled the researchers to compare the experience of those with previous breastfeeding experience and those without, which adds to the knowledge about the phenomenon. It provides information for health care professionals (HCPs) to understand the experience of bereaved milk donors and serves as a call to action for HCPs to develop best practices and incorporate lactation management in enhanced, individualized bereavement care for these women.

Background/purpose: Family-Centered care (FCC) is a model used in pediatric healthcare delivery wherein planning care for children incorporates the family, but questions remain whether there has been effective FCC implementation in practice. The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of FCC to pediatric nurses and their view of their organizations' support of FCC implementation., Method: A survey with FCC descriptor statements was distributed electronically to the Society of Pediatric Nurses. Direct care nurses (N = 132) responded to demographic questions including their education level and organization size, and 26 items rating the importance of elements of FCC in their care (as it applies to themselves) and in their organizations (as it applies to their hospital or organization) using a 5-point Likert scale. Open ended questions supplemented the survey to yield narrative comments to triangulate the findings., Results: The nurses' personal responses and their rating of their organizations were analyzed separately. The Cronbach alphas were 0.867 and 0.938, respectively. Factor analyses revealed the same three factors in the two foci of questions for (a) the nurse's own practice and (b) the organization's support of FCC: Philosophy of FCC, Implementation of FCC and Environment Variations of FCC. A qualitative process of narrative analysis added support to the factors with clarity in thematic triangulation. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the mean scores between nurses' personal responses and the mean scores for their organizations for all three factors (p = .000) and for self-reported FCC by nursing education to validate the utility of the tool., Conclusions: This instrument quantified the importance of FCC to pediatric nurses and their workplace support of FCC and can be used in future studies to evaluate FCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this study have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Neonatal palliative care is widely endorsed as an essential aspect of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) practice, yet inconsistencies in its use continue to exist. We examined neonatal nurses' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to palliative care in their NICU setting., Study Design and Methods: A cross-sectional design using the Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale (NiPCAS™©) was administered using an online survey distributed to neonatal nurses through the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) and National Association of Neonatal Nurses (NANN). Parametric statistical analyses were conducted to explore relationships between unit policy and neonatal palliative care (NPC) education, and the nurses' perceptions., Results: Ninety-nine of 1,800 AWHONN members who identified as NICU nurses completed the survey, representing a response rate of 5.5% and 101 of 4,000 NANN members who subscribe to the MYNANN message boards completed the survey, reflecting a 2.5% response rate. N = 200 surveys were completed with minimal data missing, resulting in a final sample of 200. Exploratory factor analysis yielded these subconstructs: Unit Culture, Resources, and Perceived Inappropriate Care. Barriers identified were Perceived Inappropriate Care and Societal Understanding of NPC. A positive correlation was noted for NiPCAS™© scores and unit culture support (r(185) = .66, n = 187, p < .01), unit NPC policy (r(184) = .446, n = 186, p < .01), and NPC education (r(185) = .373, n = 187, p < .01)., Clinical Implications: Nurses who work in a NICU with an NPC policy and who have received palliative care education demonstrated more favorable attitudes toward NPC. Policy and educational programs are important strategies to promote high-quality care for high-risk infants and their families., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Family-centered care (FCC) is a healthcare delivery model in which planning care for a child incorporates the entire family. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare how healthcare providers from three countries with varied cultural and healthcare systems perceive the concept FCC by measuring attitudes, and to psychometrically identify a measure that would reflect "family-centeredness.", Design and Methods: The Working with Families questionnaire, translated when appropriate, was used to capture participants' perceptions of caring for hospitalized children and their parents from pediatric healthcare providers in the United States, Australia and Turkey (n=476)., Results: The results indicated significantly more positive attitudes reported for working with children than parents for all countries and individual score differences across countries: the U.S. and Turkey child scores were significantly higher than Australia, whereas the U.S. and Australia parent scores were both significantly higher than Turkey., Conclusions: Perceptions of working with families were different for nurses from the three countries that call for a clearer understanding about perceptions in relation to delivery systems. Further analyses revealed FCS scores to be significantly different between nurses and physicians and significantly correlated with age, number of children and education., Practice Implications: The results of this study add to our understanding of influences on practice from different countries and healthcare systems. The FCS score may be useful to determine baseline beliefs and ascertain effectiveness of interventions designed to improve FCC implementation., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)