Search

Patients with unstable angina fall into a wide prognostic and therapeutic spectrum but, in general, have great access to specialty care and invasive procedures. In the modern era, in which admissions for unstable angina outnumber those for myocardial infarction, and growing economic pressures are placed on health care systems, cardiologists must re-examine clinical strategies for treating unstable angina in the light of health-cost accounting. The aims of the present study were to examine the current management of patients admitted to our cardiology department and to calculate the medical costs. A patient schedule was drawn up to prospectively register the number and type of cardiac processes carried out during hospitalization for all unstable angina patients in the period between March 1st and May 30th, 1995. Time (minutes) actually spent by both physicians and nurses for each cardiac process were carefully recorded in order to calculate the activity budget. The effective economic budget was built for each cardiac process taking into account salaries, consumable supplies, equipment service contracts, depreciation and indirect medical and non medical costs for CCU and ward. Based to the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) system, 53 out of 318 patients (16%) were admitted with documented or suspected unstable angina and allocated to discharge into four DRGs: DRG 140-medically treated unstable angina: 18 patients; DRG 124-unstable angina with angiography: 16 patients; DRG 122-unstable angina evolving in myocardial infarction: 6 patients; DRG 112-unstable angina with angioplasty: 13 patients. The mean cost for hospitalized patient with unstable angina was 5,574,958 Italian Liras (DRG 140 = 2,687,719; DRG 124 = 2,800,347; DRG 122 = 6,086,563; DRG 112 = 12,751,454). The difference in costs was essentially related to the procedures involved in medical care, DRGs with expensive cardiac processes having higher costs. Furthermore, these data show a deep discrepancy between "real" costs and current DRG reimbursement. In conclusion, data show the standard management of unstable angina at our center; calculating the true costs of unstable angina is the first step towards maximizing resources and optimizing benefits.

The cost of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during hospitalization was determined using both the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) and Process Related Group (PRG) systems. This cost-analysis system was planned and performed to estimate the cost of medical and non-medical staff involved in patient care, as well as commensurate costs. Over a three-month period, 45 patients discharged with a diagnosis of AMI, equivalent to 410 code ICD-9-CM, were enrolled in the study. The collected data were then processed and the cost for each DRG was derived. The mean cost borne for each patient with AMI was 5,864,345 Italian lire with a maximum of 17,138,300 lire for DRG 112 and a minimum of 3,332,329 lire for DRG 123. Our data suggest that in patients with AMI, there is profound discrepancy between the current DRG reimbursements and "real" cost, for example in DRG 112 (a discrepancy equivalent to 166%). The cost difference is essentially related to different procedures involved in medical care and, therefore, it follows that the overall cost of patient with AMI is primarily related to PRG cost and is largely independent of other components. These results prove that therapeutic strategies are very important in determining the cost for each DRG and that the cost for each DRG can change in relation to the PRG performed and to the progression of illness. The utilization of DRG and PRG systems appears to be an essential tool that can be used to build a system in which not only efficiency but also quality of care are evaluated.