Search

Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines and well-validated assessment scales for pain in people with hemophilia (PwH) are needed. Here, we report 28 statements covering five topics on pain assessment and management in pediatric and adult PwH that were developed by 60 Italian hemophilia specialists during a Delphi consensus process. Overall, a clear consensus was achieved for 19 of the 28 statements. Consensus was reached on all statements on the topic of pain assessment and quality of life (QoL), including the need for regular pain assessment on a quantitative scale, the importance of distinguishing between different pain types, and the need to evaluate the impact of pain on patient QoL. The other four topics concerned acute and chronic pain management in adults and in children. Consensus was reached on statements regarding non-pharmacologic treatment and the use of first-line paracetamol (acetaminophen). There was a lack of consensus regarding the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or opioids., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although the widespread use of factor VIII/IX replacement therapy has significantly reduced the severity of arthropathy in persons with haemophilia (PWH), some develop degenerative joint changes, associated with significant pain. The aim of this survey was to investigate the management and perception of pain among Italian physicians who treat PWH., Materials and Methods: Between September and October 2017, a questionnaire was distributed to 35 Italian haemophilia treatment centres (60 physicians)., Results: Fifty-three haemophilia specialists completed the survey. We found that there was good agreement (98.1%) on the need to investigate pain at each clinical visit, but there was heterogeneity in the opinions of haemophilia specialists with regards to the availability of validated guidelines (35.8%) and whether pain specialists should be a part of the comprehensive care team in daily clinical practice (58.5%). Haemophilia specialists also agreed pain should be evaluated using a rating scale validated in PWH (88.7%). Pain was mainly managed by the haemophilia specialists themselves, supported by a physiatrist and physiotherapist, while a pain specialist was only involved in 26.4% of cases. The combination of paracetamol with tramadol or codeine was the most common first-line treatment, while cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids were less commonly used., Discussion: There are some unmet needs in Italy regarding pain management for PWH and the management of pain in these patients by haemophilia specialists. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for these specialists to use, as well as a reluctance to involve pain specialists. The lack of spontaneous reporting of pain by PWH, despite using pain relief, highlights the need for clinicians to actively ask patients about any pain they may be experiencing.

Introduction: In people with haemophilia (PWH) with severe arthropathy, total joint replacement (TJR) can be undertaken if conservative management fails. Post-operative rehabilitation treatment is an important part of the comprehensive management of patients undergoing TJR., Aim: To compare post-operative standard rehabilitation (SR) and SR plus water rehabilitation (WR) in PWH undergoing TJR., Methods: PWH who were admitted to our centre between June 2003 and December 2016 for rehabilitation after TJR were included in the study. Rehabilitation included SR (ie, manual and mechanical mobilization, scar tissue massage, light muscle strengthening exercises and walking training with and without crutches) with or without WR. WR exercises with floats of different size and volume were performed when possible. Range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, pain level, perceived health status and length of hospital stay were analysed retrospectively., Results: A total of 184 patients (233 rehabilitation programmes were enrolled in the study, corresponding to 160 after total knee replacement [TKR], 37 after total ankle replacement [TAR] and 36 after total hip replacement [THR]). Fifty-eight (25%) patients were treated with WR in addition to SR (32 for TKR, 19 for TAR and 7 for THR) with an average of 5.7 hours of WR. Muscle strength, pain and perceived health status improved significantly after rehabilitation., Conclusion: This non-randomized study seems to indicate that WR plus SR improves muscle strength, pain and perceived health status more than SR alone in PWH undergoing TJR. It would be necessary, however, to carry out randomized comparative studies to confirm these provisional conclusions., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)