1. Ipilimumab with or without nivolumab in PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade refractory metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase 2 trial
- Author
-
VanderWalde, Ari, Bellasea, Shay L, Kendra, Kari L, Khushalani, Nikhil I, Campbell, Katie M, Scumpia, Philip O, Kuklinski, Lawrence F, Collichio, Frances, Sosman, Jeffrey A, Ikeguchi, Alexandra, Victor, Adrienne I, Truong, Thach-Giao, Chmielowski, Bartosz, Portnoy, David C, Chen, Yuanbin, Margolin, Kim, Bane, Charles, Dasanu, Constantin A, Johnson, Douglas B, Eroglu, Zeynep, Chandra, Sunandana, Medina, Egmidio, Gonzalez, Cynthia R, Baselga-Carretero, Ignacio, Vega-Crespo, Agustin, Garcilazo, Ivan Perez, Sharon, Elad, Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen, Patel, Sapna P, Grossmann, Kenneth F, Moon, James, Wu, Michael C, and Ribas, Antoni
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Immunology ,Clinical Research ,Patient Safety ,Minority Health ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Cancer ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Humans ,B7-H1 Antigen ,CTLA-4 Antigen ,Ipilimumab ,Melanoma ,Nivolumab ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Biomedical and clinical sciences ,Health sciences - Abstract
In this randomized phase 2 trial, blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) with continuation of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma who had received front-line anti-PD-1 or therapy against programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and whose tumors progressed was tested in comparison with CTLA-4 blockade alone. Ninety-two eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, or ipilimumab alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included the difference in CD8 T cell infiltrate among responding and nonresponding tumors, objective response rate, overall survival and toxicity. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over ipilimumab (hazard ratio = 0.63, 90% confidence interval (CI) = 0.41-0.97, one-sided P = 0.04). Objective response rates were 28% (90% CI = 19-38%) and 9% (90% CI = 2-25%), respectively (one-sided P = 0.05). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% and 35% of patients, respectively, which is consistent with the known toxicity profile of these regimens. The change in intratumoral CD8 T cell density observed in the present analysis did not reach statistical significance to support the formal hypothesis tested as a secondary endpoint. In conclusion, primary resistance to PD-1 blockade therapy can be reversed in some patients with the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03033576 .
- Published
- 2023