Search

Context: The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is a commonly used clinical tool to evaluate postural control that is traditionally performed through visual assessment and subjective evaluation of balance errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an automated computer-based scoring system using an instrumented pressure mat compared to the traditional human-based manual assessment. Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate the performance of the automated versus human BESS scoring methodology in healthy individuals. Methods: Fifty-one healthy active participants performed BESS trials following standard BESS procedures on an instrumented pressure mat (MobileMat, Tekscan Inc). Trained evaluators manually scored balance errors from frontal and sagittal plane video recordings for comparison to errors scored using center of force measurements and an automated scoring software (SportsAT, version 2.0.2, Tekscan Inc). A linear mixed model was used to determine measurement discrepancies across the 2 methods. Bland–Altman analyses were conducted to determine limit of agreement for the automated and manual scoring methods. Results: Significant differences between the automated and manual errors scored were observed across all conditions (P <.05), excluding bilateral firm stance. The greatest discrepancy between scoring methods was during the tandem foam stance, while the smallest discrepancy was during the tandem firm stance. Conclusion: The 2 methods of BESS scoring are different with wide limits of agreement. The benefits and risks of each approach to error scoring should be considered when selecting the most appropriate metric for clinical use or research studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Burnout is a complex phenomenon and a major concern in graduate medical education as it directly impacts trainee well‐being. Identifying modifiable lifestyle factors over which trainees have immediate control could support timely, actionable, individual and programme‐level interventions to combat it. Objective: The objective of this pilot study is to describe modifiable lifestyle factors that may limit the development of burnout in medical residents and fellows. Methods: We performed a cross‐sectional survey of residents and fellows at academic medical centre from September 2017 to October 2017. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory and a questionnaire designed to identify factors hypothesised to be protective against burnout. Findings: A total of 205/805 (25%) trainees completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 29.7 (2.6) years. 52% (n = 107) were female. Averaging at least 7 h of sleep per night was found to have a significant association with lower scores for the emotional exhaustion (24.8 [11, p = 0.04]) and depersonalisation (11.1 [6.4, p = 0.02]) dimensions of burnout. Additionally, self‐identifying as a healthy eater was found to have a significant association with lower scores for emotional exhaustion (25 [11.5, p = 0.03]) and depersonalisation (11.5 [6.6, p = 0.04]) as well. Workouts, hobbies, identifying with organised religion, praying, meditation and mindfulness activities were not associated with a difference. Conclusions: Adequate sleep (7 or more hours per night) and healthy eating are modifiable individual‐level lifestyle factors associated with lower burnout scores in trainees. These items could be a target for trainee education and programme level support initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting. Methods In this institutional review board–approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend. Results One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P = .027). Conclusion Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To test the non-inferiority of a novel game platform for the treatment of pediatric amblyopia compared to standard eye patching. Methods: Forty participants (ages 4 to 18 years) across seven optometric clinics in the United States diagnosed as having amblyopia associated with anisometropia were randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of eye patching therapy (n = 19) or Barron Vision (Barron Associates, Inc) video game treatment (n = 21). Participants in the eye patching group with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 20/200 in their amblyopic eye were prescribed 6 hours of patching daily, whereas those whose BCVA was 20/200 (1.00 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or better were instructed to patch for 2 hours daily. Participants in the video game group, irrespective of the severity of their amblyopia, were instructed to play four different 5-minute mini-games five times a week for a total of 20 minutes a day. Results: A mixed linear modeling analysis of before and after BCVA differences after 12 weeks showed the non-inferiority of video game treatment to eye patching using a 0.10 logMAR threshold while adjusting for the participant's age, sex, and baseline BCVA. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that a 12-week home-based video game vision therapy intervention can provide equivalent treatment outcomes to eye patching for amblyopia in children ages 5 to 18 years. Video game–based vision therapy may be a more acceptable and time-efficient alternative to existing approaches. By incorporating elements of perceptual learning, approaches such as Barron Vision video game treatment may have additional long-term therapeutic benefits and may improve treatment compliance. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(1):20–29.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]