Search

Background To investigate the inter- and intraobserver variability in comparison to an expert gold standard of the new and modified renal cyst Bosniak classification proposed for contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings (CEUS) by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) in 2020. Materials and Methods 84 CEUS examinations for the evaluation of renal cysts were evaluated retrospectively by six readers with different levels of ultrasound expertise using the modified Bosniak classification proposed for CEUS. All cases were anonymized, and each case was rated twice in randomized order. The consensus reading of two experts served as the gold standard, to which all other readers were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Cohen’s weighted kappa tests, where appropriate. Results Intraobserver variability showed substantial to almost perfect agreement (lowest kappa κ=0.74; highest kappa κ=0.94), with expert level observers achieving the best results. Comparison to the gold standard was almost perfect for experts (highest kappa κ=0.95) and lower for beginner and intermediate level readers still achieving mostly substantial agreement (lowest kappa κ=0.59). Confidence of rating was highest for Bosniak classes I and IV and lowest for classes IIF and III. Conclusion Categorization of cystic renal lesions based on the Bosniak classification proposed by the EFSUMB in 2020 showed very good reproducibility. While even less experienced observers achieved mostly substantial agreement, training remains a major factor for better diagnostic performance.

Objectives: To compare health-economic aspects of multiple imaging modalities used to monitor renal cysts, the present study evaluates costs and outcomes of patients with Bosniak IIF and III renal cysts detected and followed-up by either contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI), or contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Patients and methods: A simulation using Markov models was implemented and performed with 10 cycles of 1 year each. Proportionate cohorts were allocated to Markov models by a decision tree processing specific incidences of malignancy and levels of diagnostic performance. Costs of imaging and surgical treatment were investigated using internal data of a European university hospital. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm results considering input value uncertainties. Patient outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and costs as averages per patient including costs of imaging and surgical treatment. Results: Compared to the 'gold standard' of ceCT, ceMRI was more effective but also more expensive, with a resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) >€70 000 (Euro) per QALY gained. CEUS was dominant compared to ceCT in both Bosniak IIF and III renal cysts in terms of QALYs and costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed these results in the majority of iterations. Conclusion: Both ceMRI and CEUS can be used as alternatives to ceCT in the diagnosis and follow-up of intermediately complex cystic renal lesions without compromising effectiveness, while CEUS is clearly cost-effective. The economic results apply to a large university hospital and must be adapted for smaller hospitals.

BACKGROUND: B-Mode and Doppler ultrasound are standard diagnostic techniques for early postoperative monitoring and long-term follow-up of kidney transplants. In certain cases, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is used to clarify unclear Doppler findings. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the workup of renal allograft pathologies. METHODS: A systematic search for CEUS examinations of renal transplants conducted in our department between 2008 and 2020 was performed using the following inclusion criteria: i) patient age ≥18 years and ii) confirmation of diagnosis by biopsy and histopathology, imaging follow-up by CEUS, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI), or angiography, or intraoperative findings. Exclusion criteria were: i) CEUS performed in the setting of a study and ii) CEUS for other indications than dedicated renal transplant examination. Statistical analysis was performed separately for subgroups with different indications (focal vs non-focal). RESULTS: Overall, 78 patients were included in the statistical analysis, which revealed high sensitivity (92.2%, 95% -confidence interval [CI] 81.5–96.9%) and high specificity (88.9%, 95% -CI 71.9–96.1%) of CEUS. CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic performance demonstrated here and the superficial location of kidney allografts advocate the additional use of CEUS in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients.

Lymph node metastases are common in malignant neoplasms of head and neck. Since cervical lymph nodes (cLN) are localized superficially, ultrasound (US) represents the primary imaging modality. The aim of the study is to report the value of US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and their diagnostic confidence in the characterization of inconclusive cLN. A systematic review was performed using the literature data base PubMed. Results were filtered (published in a peer-reviewed journal, full-text available, published within the last ten years, species human, English or German full-text) and inclusion criteria were clearly defined (cohort with lymphadenopathy or malignancy in head and neck ≥ 50 patients, histological confirmation of malignant imaging findings, performance of CEUS as outcome variable). The results were quantified in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Overall, five studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The combination of non-enhanced US and CEUS enlarges the diagnostic confidence in the characterization of lymph nodes of unclear dignity. The pooled values for sensitivity and specificity in the characterization of a malignant cervical lymph node using US are 76% (95%-CI 66–83%, I2 = 63%, p 2 = 92%, p 2 = 0%, p = 0.65) and 91% (95%-CI 87–94%, I2 = 0%, p = 0.40) for the combination of US and CEUS, respectively. Consistent results of the included studies show improved diagnostic performance by additional CEUS. Nevertheless, more prospective studies are needed to implement CEUS in the diagnostic pathway of cLN.

BACKGROUND: Penile fracture (PF) is defined as rupture of the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa. While most authors agree that rapid surgical therapy of this rare pathology leads to the best patient outcome, the role of imaging is highly controversial in the published literature. To obtain further evidence concerning the diagnostic accuracies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in the diagnostic assessment of patients with suspected PF. METHODS: We systematically reviewed MRI and US examinations performed in our institution between 2000 and 2021 and correlated imaging reports with either intraoperative finding or final clinical diagnosis. Inclusion criteria were: (I) patient age ≥18 years, (II) examination between 2000 and 2021, (III) information available on patient’s history and clinical presentation, and (IV) documented final diagnosis in discharge letter. Next to diagnostic accuracy, we describe typical imaging findings such as penile hematoma, tear of the tunica albuginea including location in terms of side and shaft segment affected, and involvement of corpus spongiosum. RESULTS: Overall, 46 of 88 included patients (54.5%) had a confirmed diagnosis of PF. A total of 69 MRI and 31 US examinations were included. Sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% (95% CI: 78.7–97.2%) and 90.6% (95% CI: 75.8–96.8%) for MRI and 71.4% (95% CI: 45.4–88.3%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 81.6–100.0%) for US, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that MRI is more suitable to confirm PF and identify the site of the associated tunica albuginea tear while US is a good tool for ruling out PF.