Search

Stream, floodplain, and wetland restorations enhance water quality and ecological function; however, soil health is prioritized infrequently in restoration planning and monitoring. Buried, historic, hydric soils—common across U.S. mid‐Atlantic valley bottoms beneath legacy sediments—are not included in most floodplain restoration designs, though they may retain favorable biogeochemical characteristics and host legacy microbial communities that could support ecosystem recovery if exhumed and preserved. To assess the efficacy of including historic hydric soils in floodplain restoration for nitrogen (N) removal, we characterized pre‐Euro‐American settlement wetland soils buried below legacy sediments and now exposed along incised streambanks across the mid‐Atlantic. We compared carbon (C) and N contents; C:N ratios; nitrate‐N and ammonium‐N concentrations; denitrification rates; functional genes for denitrification (nosZ) and nitrification (amoA for ammonia oxidizing archaea [AoA] + ammonia oxidizing bacteria [AoB]); and phospholipid fatty acid biomasses of historic wetland soils with contemporary wetland soils before and after an 1‐year incubation in a recently restored floodplain. Compared to modern wetland soils, historic hydric soils buried by legacy sediment are less nutrient‐rich, have fewer functional genes for and lower rates of denitrification, and possess significantly less microbial biomass. Following the 1‐year incubation, many of these concentrations, rates, and gene counts increased in historic soils, though not substantially. Ultimately, our results suggest that while inclusion of historic, hydric soils and their legacy microbiomes is valuable for N‐removal in floodplain restoration, the recovery of historic, hydric soils is predictably slow, and attainment of restoration goals, such as increased denitrification, may require multiple years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Damming has substantially fragmented and altered riverine ecosystems worldwide. Dams slow down streamflows, raise stream and groundwater levels, create anoxic or hypoxic hyporheic and riparian environments and result in deposition of fine sediments above dams. These sediments represent a good opportunity to study human legacies altering soil environments, for which we lack knowledge on microbial structure, depth distribution, and ecological function. Methods: Here, we compared high throughput sequencing of bacterial/ archaeal and fungal community structure (diversity and composition) and functional genes (i.e., nitrification and denitrification) at different depths (ranging from 0 to 4 m) in riparian sediments above breached and existing milldams in the Mid-Atlantic United States. Results: We found significant location- and depth-dependent changes in microbial community structure. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Thaumarchaeota, and Verrucomicrobia were the major prokaryotic components while Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, and Rozellomycota dominated fungal sequences retrieved from sediment samples. Ammonia oxidizing genes (amoA for AOA) were higher at the sediment surface but decreased sharply with depth. Besides top layers, denitrifying genes (nosZ) were also present at depth, indicating a higher denitrification potential in the deeper layers. However, these results contrasted with in situ denitrification enzyme assay (DEA) measurements, suggesting the presence of dormant microbes and/or other nitrogen processes in deep sediments that compete with denitrification. In addition to enhanced depth stratification, our results also highlighted that dam removal increased species richness, microbial diversity, and nitrification. Discussion: Lateral and vertical spatial distributions of soil microbiomes (both prokaryotes and fungi) suggest that not only sediment stratification but also concurrent watershed conditions are important in explaining the depth profiles of microbial communities and functional genes in dammed rivers. The results also provide valuable information and guidance to stakeholders and restoration projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]