Search

This article reports on original research investigating teacher wellbeing while teaching mathematics in relation to teacher identity. Using survey data from mathematics teachers (N = 402) participating in a teacher of mathematics support initiative, teacher wellbeing was operationally defined as the experience of wellbeing whilst teaching, allowing an applied understanding of wellbeing in relation to the activity of teaching. Teacher identity was construed from prior research by the authors (Willis et al., in: Math Educ Res J, 10.1007/s13394-021-00391-w, 2021) and operationalised for the current study in terms of a specific teacher of mathematics identity (ToMI) construct. The main research question for this investigation was directed at how well the ToMI construct, as a wellbeing variable, was able to predict teacher wellbeing while teaching, viewed as an 'in situ' or 'active' (applied) measure of wellbeing. Identity-Based Motivation (IBM) theory was used to frame the research, as it helps explain how the degree of congruency between identity and wellbeing may influence motivation to teach. Results indicated that although several important factors relate significantly to teacher of mathematics wellbeing, the ToMI construct predicted teacher wellbeing far above the ability of all other study factors combined, suggesting that a focus on the development of a professional identity for teachers is fundamental to the support of teacher wellbeing in schools. Suggestions for investigating this focus at the school level are also provided.

A measure of teacher identity specific to teachers of mathematics was developed and assessed, the teacher of mathematics identity (ToMI) scale. A sample of teachers was recruited from a state-based mathematics association to complete an online survey including items based on the theories of Mead, Erikson, and Wenger. The subscales of belonging to a mathematics community, self-efficacy as a teacher of mathematics, and enthusiasm to be a teacher of mathematics were derived using exploratory factor analysis (n = 301) and then confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis (n = 311) with randomly allocated independent subsamples. These subscales were related and, when combined to form a single factor, explained a substantial proportion of the variance in the data, suggesting that the ToMI scale can be used as three separate subscales or combined to form a single overarching construct. Overall, ToMI and subscale scores were used in the validation process. Tests of validity were run in the two randomly allocated subsamples independently, allowing for replication of findings. As predicted based on the literature, the ToMI scale and subscales were related to the number of years teaching mathematics, the size of teacher of mathematics network accessed by teachers, and participation in mathematics-specific self-directed professional learning and wellbeing while teaching mathematics. These results reveal this initial iteration of the ToMI scale as valid concerning the underlying teacher identity theory, providing an important research avenue to pursue our understanding and development of effective teachers of mathematics.

This study aims to establish a Heutagogy approach for teacher professional education in Indonesia as an attempt to improve teacher competencies. This study will identify key elements of a Heutagogy approach derived from previous Heutagogy practices. The methods to collect data for developing the Heutagogy approach in this study employs a literature review of previous research and findings related to Heutagogy practice. In this regard, this study's established elements are Learner-determined learning, Metacognitive reflection, Collaboration, and Capability development. These elements are analysed and then incorporated into the TPE model with support from online learning tools. Capability development is the goal of experiencing each of the elements of Heutagogy in this approach. Each of these key elements will contribute to developing participants capability as professional teachers. The Heutagogy approach in this study is expected to be significant for improving teacher competencies in Indonesia.

Education systems across the globe have enacted national testing regimes to monitor and report student achievement progress as an outcome of teaching performance. This paper reports on an investigation of strategies that Principals of high achieving schools use to achieve school results, based on NAPLAN reports (the National Assessment Program in Australia) and interpreted via the Alignment, Capability and Engagement (ACE) model of organisational readiness. Our findings identified specific Principal behaviours, actions and attitudes as necessary for effective school-wide improvement programs, as well as the existence of commonly shared strategies and approaches that help to explain why these particular Principals have been successful in their pursuit of school improvement. These include a shared vision for improvement, use of data-driven decision making, and building positive, "transparent" relationships to encourage teacher buy-in. Importantly, these findings identified "organisational readiness", a foundational principle of the ACE model, as a fundamental requisite to effective school improvement.

This article outlines a Teacher of Mathematics Identity (ToMI) framework as an innovative theoretical foundation for supporting teachers of mathematics in regional, rural and remote (RRR) Australia. The framework is based on the identification of systemic challenges and provision of adaptive solutions, beginning with localised challenges faced in RRR communities. In unpacking the ToMI framework, this article outlines the basis for a longitudinal study designed to develop interconnected collaborative networks for teachers of mathematics in order to help them develop their professional identity. These networks include professional learning opportunities and systematic feedback and support regimes, such as mentoring, all within a community of practice supported by a professional affiliate organisation. Once the efficacy and applicability of the framework is established, it is likely to apply to other teaching disciplines, in particular, to STEM teaching areas, but also to other subject areas, as well as other countries, that might share similar systemic challenges.