Search

Background Timely coordination between stroke team members is of relevance for stroke code management. We explore the feasibility and potential utility of a smartphone application for clinical and neuroimaging data sharing for improving workflow metrics of stroke code pathways, and professionals’ opinions about its use. Methods We performed an observational pilot study including stroke code activations at La Paz University Hospital in Madrid, from June 2019 to March 2020. Patients were classified according to the activation or not of the JOIN app by the attending physician. Clinical data and time-to-procedures were retrieved from the app or from the hospital records and the Madrid regional stroke registry as appropriate and compared between both groups. An anonymous survey collected professionals’ opinions about the app and its use. Results A total of 282 stroke code activations were registered. The JOIN app was activated in 111 (39%) cases. They had a significant reduction in imaging-to-thrombolysis (31 vs 20 min, p = .026) and in door-to-thrombolysis times (51 vs 36 min, p = .004), with more patients achieving a door-to-needle time below 45 min (68.8% vs 37.8%, p = .016). About 50% of the users found the app useful for facilitating the diagnosis and decision-making; interoperability with clinical files was considered an opportunity for improvement. Conclusions This pilot study suggests that JOIN helps improve and document workflow metrics in acute stroke management in a comprehensive stroke centre. These results support testing JOIN in a prospective randomised study to confirm its usefulness and the general applicability of the results.

BackgroundChest CT has been proposed as a screening test to rule out SARS-CoV-2 lung infection in acute stroke. Our objectives are to analyze the predictive value of neck CT angiography (CTA) source images compared with conventional chest CT, the interobserver concordance and the reliability of the diagnosis using a mobile app.MethodsA retrospective observational study that included acute stroke patients admitted to a stroke center. Two raters blinded to the clinical data evaluated and classified the pulmonary findings in chest CT and neck CTA source images according to the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). CTA findings were evaluated using a conventional workstation and the JOIN mobile app. Scores of 3-5 were grouped as appearing typical or indeterminate for COVID-19 lung involvement and 0-2 as appearing atypical or negative for pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).ResultsA total of 242 patients were included (42 with PCR-confirmed COVID-19). In the cohort of 43 patients with both neck CTA and chest CT, the predictive value for COVID-19 was equivalent (sensitivity, 53.8%; specificity, 92.9%). The interobserver agreement in the classification into CO-RADS 3-5 or 1-2 in CTA was good (K = 0.694; standard error, 0.107). In the cohort of 242 patients with neck CTA, the intraobserver agreement between the workstation and the JOIN app was perfect (K = 1.000; standard error 0.000).ConclusionsNeck CTA enables the accurate identification of COVID-19-associated lung abnormalities in acute stroke. CO-RADS evaluations through mobile applications have a predictive value similar to the usual platforms.

Background Multiple randomized trials could not establish the noninferiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or superiority of IVT followed by EVT in anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion stroke. The role of prior IVT in posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion remains controversial. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, patients with stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in the posterior circulation who received EVT alone or with IVT were selected from the stroke thrombectomy and aneurysm registry between 2013 and 2022. Effects of IVT followed by thrombectomy on favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale≤3 at 90 days) and safety were investigated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models. Results Of the 588 included patients, 67% (n = 394) were treated with EVT alone and 29% (n = 170) with EVT after IVT, and 4% (n = 24) have missing values on this variable. Controlling for multiple confounding factors, IVT was not associated with a higher likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.52–2.09; P = 0.901). Thrombectomy alone did not show any safety advantages compared with those receiving IVT. Conclusion Similar functional outcomes and complication rates were seen in patients with posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion treated with EVT alone versus EVT after IVT. Further prospective studies are required to determine the utility of IVT in posterior circulation stroke, especially in patients being directly admitted to thrombectomy centers.

Introduction Poststroke hyperglycaemia is an independent risk factor for poorer outcomes in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and is associated with a lower probability of functional recovery and higher mortality at 3 months. This study aims to evaluate the association between glucose levels during cerebral reperfusion with MT and functional recovery at 3 months, measured by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices.Methods This prospective observational study aims to recruit 100 patients with ischaemic stroke and large anterior circulation vessel occlusion, in whom MT is indicated. CGM will be performed using a Freestyle Libre ProIQ device (FSL-CGM, Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA), which will be implanted on admission to the emergency department, to monitor glucose levels before, during and after reperfusion. The study’s primary endpoint will be the functional status at 3 months, as measured by the dichotomised modified Rankin Scale (0–2 indicating good recovery and 3–6 indicating dependency or death). We will analyse expression profiles of microRNA (miRNA) at the time of reperfusion and 24 hours later, as potential biomarkers of ischaemic-reperfusion injury. The most promising miRNAs include miR-100, miR-29b, miR-339, miR-15a and miR-424. All patients will undergo treatment according to current international recommendations and local protocols for the treatment of stroke, including intravenous thrombolysis if indicated.Ethics and dissemination This study (protocol V.1.1, dated 29 October 2021, code 6017) has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) and has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 05871502). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in Open Access format and at conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT05871502.

Background and Purpose Outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are strongly correlated with successful recanalization, traditionally defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS; 2–5) who achieved mTICI 2b versus those who achieved mTICI 2c/3 after MT. Methods This study utilized data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), which combined databases from 32 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers between 2013 and 2023. The study included only patients with low ASPECTS who achieved mTICI 2b, 2c, or 3 after MT for internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (M1) stroke. Results Of the 10,229 patients who underwent MT, 234 met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 98 (41.9%) achieved mTICI 2b, and 136 (58.1%) achieved mTICI 2c/3. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The 90-day favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score: 0–3) was significantly better in the mTICI 2c/3 group than in the mTICI 2b group (adjusted odds ratio 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–4.81; P=0.02). Binomial logistic regression revealed that achieving mTICI 2c/3 was significantly associated with higher odds of a favorable 90-day outcome (odds ratio 2.14; 95% CI 1.07–4.41; P=0.04). Conclusion In patients with low ASPECTS, achieving an mTICI 2c/3 score after MT is associated with a more favorable 90-day outcome. These findings suggest that mTICI 2c/3 is a better target for MT than mTICI 2b in patients with low ASPECTS.

Background As the number of thrombectomy passes increases during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute stroke, neurointerventionalists must weigh the risks of potential complications against the risk of failing to recanalize the affected vessel. Thus, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EVT for patients with acute stroke in which ≥5 EVT passes were performed. Methods This retrospective cohort study from January 2013 to December 2022 included 31 thrombectomy‐capable centers. Patients in whom ≥5 EVT passes were made were included in the analysis. The patients with successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b at 5, 6, 7, or more passes were compared with unsuccessful recanalization. We also compared procedure time, separated by 30 minutes. Primary outcome was a favorable 90‐day outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0–2). Secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage and death. Results A total of 407 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 175 were women (43.1%); the mean age was 67.3 years. In 265 (65.1%) patients, successful recanalization was achieved: 134 patients with 5 passes, 67 patients with 6 passes, and 64 with ≥7 passes. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration was more common in the unsuccessful recanalization group (successful recanalization with 5, 6, and ≥7 EVT passes and unsuccessful recanalization: 35.3%, 30.3%, 18.8%, and 45.4%, respectively). Successful recanalization with 5, 6, and ≥7 EVT passes was associated with favorable outcome compared with unsuccessful recanalization group (adjusted odds ratio successful recanalization with 5, 6, and ≥7 EVT passes to unsuccessful recanalization [95% CIs]: 8.29 [2.13–32.3]; 14.0 [3.27–60.3]; and 5.26 [1.12–24.8], respectively). However, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not significantly different between the groups. Regarding procedure time, favorable outcome was not significantly different in each group, while symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred more frequently in the 60 to 89 minutes group compared with the