Search

Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P, For resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated at our institution, routine surveillance testing rarely enabled successful salvage therapy, did not detect recurrence earlier, and did not extend duration of palliative chemotherapy. Further prospected data is warranted to establish the role of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Cholinergic neurons are ubiquitous and involved in various higher brain functions including learning and memory. Patients with Alzheimer's disease exhibit significant dysfunction and loss of cholinergic neurons. Meanwhile, such cholinergic deficits can be potentially relieved pharmacologically by increasing acetylcholine. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors have been used to improve cholinergic transmission in the brain for two decades and have proven effective for alleviating symptoms in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, the search for AChE inhibitors for drug development is ongoing. The enzymatic pocket of AChE has long been the target of several drug designs over the last two decades. The peripheral and catalytic sites of AChE are simultaneously bound by several dimeric molecules, enabling more-efficient inhibition. Here, we used 6-chlorotacrine and the tetrahydroquinolone moiety of huperzine A to design and synthesize a series of heterodimers that inhibit AChE at nanomolar potency. Specifically, compound 7b inhibits AChE with an IC50

In order to give full play to the advantages of energy saving, high efficiency, economy, and low carbon of combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system, it is necessary to seek an optimal operation mode. In this paper, a CCHP system model including energy storage equipment and ground source heat pump is established. To ensure the control accuracy, the unit commitment problem is considered in the programming. The optimal operation mode of CCHP system is obtained by taking the minimum annual operation cost, including pollutant treatment cost and the maximum primary energy utilization rate as the objective, and discussing the weight value of the above two purposes. Compared with the single objective optimization method, this optimal operation mode can provide more diversified and refined choices for the actual operation of CCHP system.

e16219 Background: While pancreatic cancer (PC) globally has poor outcomes, there are still regional variation in PC outcomes in Canada. Nova Scotia (NS) has been documented to have some of the worst outcomes in PC but the details and barriers to the care of PC in NS have never been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on PC patients (pts) diagnosed in NS from 2013 to 2017 for patient characteristics, referral pattern, treatments and wait times. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to analyze overall survival (OS) with Age, Stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS), Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI), receiving ERCP and receiving chemotherapy as covariates in the multivariate analysis. Results: 667 consecutive pts were identified, which included 357 males and 310 females with a median age of 71 at diagnosis. 42 (6.25%) lived beyond 2 years, while 163 (24.4%) survived for under 30 days and 260 (39%) survived for under 60 days. Patients with a limited survival (under 30 days) when compared to pts who survived > 60 days are older (mean 75 vs 71, P < 0.05), had a higher proportion of ECOG > 2 (81.6% vs 20.3%, P < 0.01), and a higher proportion of stage 4 disease (73.9% vs 41.2%, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in any measure of wait times. Pts with limited survival were less likely to be seen by Medical Oncology (MO) (20.9% vs 70.9%, P < 0.001), and less likely to receive chemotherapy (1.2% vs 45%, P < 0.001) or ERCP (27% vs 53.8%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that receiving ERCP (P = 0.027) and chemotherapy(P < 0.001) are independent predictors of survival, even when accounting for PS, CCI, stage, and age. Conclusions: Analysis of PC outcomes in NS demonstrates a large proportion of pts dying within 30 days of diagnosis. Those pts are older and present with higher stage and worse PS but did not have any significant difference in diagnostic and referral wait times. Those pts receive fewer referrals to Oncology services, fewer potentially life prolonging treatments and we uniquely discovered ERCP as an independent predictor of survival in our population. While further work is needed, this study characterized some of the unique challenges of PC care in NS as a province with a higher proportional of older adults and highlights potential opportunities to improve early healthcare delivery in older adults with limited windows for care.

328 Background: Esophageal cancer arising within a previous radiation treatment field (ECRF) is rare. The patterns of disease, treatment and outcomes in these patients (pts) have not been well characterized. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for pts treated for esophageal cancer at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 2002-2016. Electronic medical records of all pts with a histologic diagnosis of esophageal cancer occurring within the field of previous radiotherapy were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 31 ECRF pts identified, the most common prior cancer was head and neck (45%), median radiation (RT) dose 50Gy, median time to diagnosis of esophageal cancer 12 years. Features at diagnosis of ECRF included: median age 71 years, 58% male, 87% with performance status (PS) 0-1, 77% squamous cell carcinoma, 19% stage IV. Treatment intent was curative in 16 pts, palliative in 15 (Table). Reasons for palliative treatment were: 40% metastatic, 53% comorbidities/PS, 7% anatomic factors. Of resected pts, 36% had a pT1-2 tumour, 55% pN0, 69% R0. For curative pts, median PFS was 26.2 months (95%CI 10.9-34.4) with a 3 year PFS rate of 35% (95% CI 15-81). Median OS for curative pts was 26.4 months (95%CI 17.8-105.5) with a 3 year OS rate of 43% (95% CI 22-83). Most palliative pts were unable to have chemotherapy due to comorbidities and PS. Median OS for palliative pts was 9.5 months (95% CI 3.6-15.4). Conclusions: Most ECRF pts presented with earlier stage disease; however, more than a third of these could not have aggressive curative treatment due to comorbidities and/or PS. Most curative pts had surgery alone. Few palliative pts had chemotherapy, largely due to poor clinical status. Our data suggest that outcomes in both curative and palliative ECRF pts may be limited by the ability to tolerate standard of care treatments. [Table: see text]

164 Background: A microscopically positive (R1) resection margin following resection for gastroesophageal (GE) cancer has been documented to be a poor prognostic factor. The optimal strategy and impact of different modalities of adjuvant treatment for an R1 resection margin remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients (pts) with GE cancer treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 2006-2016. Electronic medical records of all pts with an R1 resection margin were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to analyze recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) with stage and neoadjuvant treatment as covariates in the multivariate analysis. Results: We identified 78 GE cancer pts with an R1 resection. 11% had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 14% chemoradiation (CRT), 75% surgery alone. 28% had involvement of the proximal margin, 13% distal, 56% radial, 3% had multiple positive margins. By the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition classification, 88% had a pT3-4 tumour, 66% pN2-3 nodal involvement, 64% grade 3, 68% with lymphovascular invasion. 3% were pathological stage I, 21% stage II and 74% stage III. Adjuvant therapy was given in 46% of R1 pts (24% CRT, 18% chemotherapy alone, 3% radiation alone, 1% reoperation). Median RFS for all pts was 12.6 months (95% CI 10.3-17.2). Site of first recurrence was 71% distant, 16% locoregional, 13% mixed. Median OS was 29.3 months (95% CI 22.9-50) for all pts. The 5 year survival rate was 23% (95% CI 12%-43%). There was no significant difference in RFS (log-rank test p= 0.63, adjusted p= 0.14) or OS (log-rank test p= 0.68, adjusted p= 0.65) regardless of adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Most pts with positive margins after resection for GE cancer had advanced pathologic stage and prognosis was poor. Our study did not find improved RFS or OS with adjuvant treatment and only one pt had reresection. The main failure pattern was distant recurrence, suggesting that pts being considered for adjuvant RT should be carefully selected. Further studies are required to determine factors to select pts with good prognosis despite a positive margin, or those who may benefit from adjuvant treatment.

e15579 Background: Although commonly performed, evidence supporting routine surveillance testing (SvT) in patients (pts) with resected GEAC is lacking. We evaluated patterns of relapse, frequency of salvage therapy and outcomes among pts with resected GEAC who underwent surveillance. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive pts with GEAC followed at Princess Margaret Cancer Center after resection were reviewed. SvT was any investigation performed in the absence of pt-reported symptoms, abnormal physical exam findings, or bloodwork. Relapse patterns were classified as locoregional (LRR; surgical anastomosis/gastroesophageal lumen/regional nodes) or distant (DR; beyond locoregional). Time-to-relapse (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from initial diagnosis, post recurrence survival (PRS) from initial relapse. Results: Median age was 64.1 years. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%), surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy (26%) or surgery plus chemoradiation (45%). SvT included imaging (71%), endoscopy (19%), tumor markers (6%), and clinical visits alone (9%). After median follow-up of 38.3 months (mo) (range 5.6-122.3), 3- and 5-year OS rates were 68% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62-75%) and 56% (95% CI 49-64%) respectively. Among 97 relapses (46%), 51 were detected by SvT, 45 by symptoms. Relapse patterns included LRR alone (4%), DR alone (86%) and both (10%). The majority of relapses (93%) occurred within 3 years. Pts with SvT-detected relapse had similar median TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 mo, p = 0.40) but longer PRS (16.5 vs 4.6 mo, p < 0.001) and OS (36.2 vs 23.7 mo, p = 0.004) than pts with symptomatic relapse. Salvage therapy in 4 pts (2%) resulted in post recurrence disease-free survival ≥2 years. Duration of palliative chemotherapy was similar between 28 pts with SvT-detected relapse and 18 pts with symptomatic relapses (3.9 vs 3.3 mo, p = 0.64). Conclusions: Following curative resection, 96% of relapses were distant. Routine SvT rarely enabled successful salvage therapy and did not extend duration of palliative chemotherapy. Longer OS in SvT-detected relapses was not due to earlier disease detection. These findings do not support routine SvT in pts with resected GEAC.

The thermal degradation and corresponding decomposition products of fresh and heat-treated soybean oil were investigated by synchronous thermal analyzer combined with Fourier transform infrared spectrometry and quadrupole mass spectrometry (STA–FTIR–QMS). Two longtime heat-treated soybean oil samples were aforehand prepared by consistently heating the fresh soybean oil for 50 and 100 h, respectively. N2 and simulative air (N2/O2 = 4:1, volume) were used as the thermal reaction gas atmosphere. The results showed that one stage of mass loss appeared in analysis of the all oil samples under N2 atmosphere condition and longtime heat pre-treatment had no effect on the thermal behavior of the soybean oil under N2 atmosphere condition. However, four stages occurred in analysis of both untreated and heat-treated oil samples under the simulative air atmosphere condition. Longtime heat pre-treatment influenced the thermal behavior of the soybean oil in certain extent, which was reflected in the different mass loss values of the four stages. According to the infrared absorption profiles and MS spectra of the released compounds in vapor phase, H2O, CO, CO2, hydrocarbons (such as CH4), and hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl-contained compounds have been confirmed. Therefore, STA–FTIR–QMS can be suggested as a promising technique for investigating of thermal degradation and monitoring the decomposition products of the evolving substances in edible oils.

Anemoside A3 (AA3) is a natural triterpenoid glycoside isolated from the root of Pulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regel. We previously showed that AA3 exhibits cognitive-enhancing and neuroprotective properties. In the present study, we demonstrated that AA3 modulates inflammatory responses by regulating prostaglandin E receptor 4 signaling. Because prostaglandin E receptor 4 is involved in the pathophysiology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of human multiple sclerosis (MS), we assessed the beneficial effect of AA3 in EAE mice. AA3 treatment significantly reduced clinical severity and inflammatory infiltrates in the spinal cord of EAE mice. In vitro studies revealed that AA3 inhibited the T cell response toward the encephalitogenic epitope of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). AA3 significantly downregulated the expressions of certain Th1 and Th17 cytokines in activated T cells re-stimulated by MOG. Moreover, AA3 inhibited the activation of STAT4 and STAT3, which are the transcription factors pivotal for Th1 and Th17 lineage differentiation, respectively, in activated T cells. Pharmacological analysis further suggested that AA3 reduced Th17 cell differentiation and expansion. In conclusion, AA3 exerts an immunomodulatory effect in EAE, demonstrating its potential as a therapeutic agent for MS in humans.

Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to study the effect of enzyme to substrate ratio (11.8–23.6 U α-amylase/g rice starch), hydrolysis temperature (90–100°C) and pH value (6.0–6.6) on the gel strength of rice starches-based fat substitute using α-amylase hydrolysis. The optimum conditions obtained from response surface analysis was 16.52 U/g enzyme dosage, 92°C hydrolysis temperature while the influence of pH was found insignificant in the range tested. Under these optimum conditions, the gel strength of this fat substitute was 113 g/cm2, very close to the gel strength of butter of 114 g/cm2, while the solubility of the substitute was 1.33 ± 0.01% and the swelling power 4.85 ± 0.02. There were no observable differences in the granular size distribution between the untreated rice starch and the hydrolyzed rice starch. Rheological properties of this rice starch-based fat substitute implied that it is easier for the substitute to form three-dimensional networks under 34°C.

162 Background: Although commonly performed, the benefit of routine surveillance testing (SvT) following curative resection of GEAC is undefined. We aimed to determine frequency of successful salvage therapy (SST) in patients (pts) with relapsed GEAC who were surveyed post curative therapy. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive pts with locally advanced GEAC underwent curative surgery and subsequent surveillance at Princess Margaret Cancer Center. SST was defined as any potentially curative therapy for recurrence which resulted in post-recurrence survival (PRS) two years without further relapse. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Median age was 64.1 years. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (41%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were included. Pts received surgery alone (29%), surgery with perioperative chemotherapy (26%) or perioperative chemoradiation (45%) as primary curative therapy. At median follow-up of 33.6 months (m, range 6.0-122.4), 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68% (95% CI 61-75%) and 59% (95% CI 51-68%) respectively. SvT modalities included imaging (69%), endoscopy (19%), tumor markers (4%), and clinical visits only (9%). Recurrences occurred in 95 (45%) pts, 51% were surveillance-detected (SvDR), and 47% were non-SvDR. Types of recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (87%) or both (9%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 14 pts (7%) with SvDR and 1 with non-SvDR. In four pts with SvDR (1.9%) salvage therapy was successful with chemoradiation or surgery perioperative chemotherapy, six were unsuccessful, and 5 had immature follow-up. Compared with pts with non-SvDR, pts with SvDR had longer median OS (34.8 vs. 24.0m, p=0.03) and PRS (14.4 vs. 4.8m, p < 0.001), and similar time-to-relapse (15.6 vs. 12.0m, p = 0.67). Palliative chemotherapy was administered in 25 pts with SvDR and 18 pts with non-SvDR with similar median duration (3.5m vs. 3.3m, p=0.64). Conclusions: Following curative therapy, 96% of relapses were distant. SvT enabled SST in only 1.9% of pts, and did not extend duration of palliative chemotherapy. These data do not support the use of routine SvT in resected GEAC.

171 Background: Disease related symptoms including anorexia, nausea and dysphagia lead patients with esophageal cancer to become malnourished. Malnourishment can result in systemic inflammation, reduced treatment tolerance, poorer quality of life and decreased overall survival. Currently weight loss is the main clinical measure of malnutrition, and thus we set out to evaluate the prognostic utility of alternative screening tools of malnutrition. Methods: Patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (MESCC) attending the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, between January 2011 and December 2016, were identified from the institutional gastroesophageal database. Nutritional Risk Score (NRS), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) and Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were calculated and correlated with clinical-pathological variables and survival. Malnutrition was defined as NRS ≥ 3, NRI < 97.5 and NLR ≥ 3. Results: Of the 64 consecutive patients, 30 (47%) presented with de novo metastatic disease and 34 (53%) with recurrence. The median age was 62 years (range 40-85), 47 patients were ECOG PS ≤ 2 and 29 (45%) received systemic chemotherapy. 90% of patients experienced weight loss > 5% prior to diagnosis and median BMI was 20.1 (range 14.3-34.9). NRI identified 37 (58%) and NRS 45 (70%) patients as malnourished. Both were associated with poorer ECOG PS (p = 0.012 and p = 0.027 respectively). No difference was identified with sex, smoking status or albumin with univariate analysis. NRI did not associate significantly with age. Median overall survival was 5months; 8.1-9 months with normal nutrition and 2.8-3.2 months in malnourished patients. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed significant difference in overall survival (malnutrition vs. normal nutrition) using NRS (p = 0.029) and NRI (p = 0.001) but not weight (p = 0.509) or NLR (p = 0.69). Conclusions: Patients with MESCC identified as malnourished at the time of diagnosis have inferior survival outcomes. Malnutrition tools are superior to weight alone with respect to discriminating outcomes in this patient population. Further investigation is needed in larger patient cohorts; to identify those at risk, initiate early supportive interventions and improve patient outcomes.

145 Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) in gastroesophageal (GE) cancers are rare. There have only been limited studies examining the role of HER2 status in CNS mets in GE cancers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients (pts) treated for GE cancers at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 2011-2016. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected for all pts with CNS mets. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival (PFS) for CNS mets pts. Results: Of 34 GE cancer pts diagnosed with CNS mets, 11 were HER2+, 11 HER2- and 12 had unknown HER2 status. Median time from initial cancer diagnosis to CNS mets was 10.3 months (13.4 in HER2+, 5.8 in HER2-, 11.7 in HER2 unknown). Characteristics at CNS mets diagnosis included: median age 63; 85% male; 74% had extracranial systemic mets; performance status ECOG 0-1 (64%), 2 (12%), 3-4 (24%). Treatment for CNS mets is shown in Table 1. Median OS from diagnosis of CNS mets was 6.1 months (95%CI 3.2-16.4) for all pts, 17.1 (95%CI 9.9-NA) in HER2+, 1.8 (95%CI 0.6-NA) in HER2-, 6.0 (95%CI 1.9-NA) in HER2 unknown, p=0.01. Median OS from initial cancer diagnosis was 18.5 months (95%CI 13.6-33.7) for all pts, 28.9 (95%CI 21.32-NA) in HER2+, 10.8 (95%CI 6.37-NA) in HER2-, 18.6 (95%CI 10-NA) in HER2 unknown, p=0.015. The 1 year CNS PFS rate was 35% (95%CI 22.1 – 55.5%) for all pts, 53% (95%CI 29.9 – 94%) in HER2+, 18.2% (95%CI 5.3 – 63.7%) in HER2-, 33% (95%CI 15 – 74.2%) in HER2 unknown, p=0.053. Conclusions: HER2+ pts tended to develop CNS mets later than HER2-. HER2+ pts were more likely to receive CNS-directed interventions, with more HER2+ pts having surgery for CNS mets while more HER2- had supportive care. This analysis is the first to suggest that in pts with CNS mets, HER2+ pts had longer survival than HER2-, both from initial diagnosis and after developing CNS metastases.[Table: see text]

147 Background: Literature on recurrence and outcomes of HPGEC is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine pattern of recurrence and outcomes after curative intent surgery for locally advanced HPGEC. Methods: A retrospective database was used to identify consecutive patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas undergoing curative intent resection between 2011 and 2016 at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Clinico-demographic data were extracted from the electronic health record. Patterns of relapse are classified as nonvisceral (defined as recurrences in the bone, peritoneal or both), visceral (not nonvisceral, including the brain), or both. Time to relapse (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from date of histologic diagnosis. Results: Of 45 patients with HPGEC, 78% were male, and 91% were non-Asian. Median age was 64.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53, 70); 60% were gastroesophageal junction, 24% were gastric, and 16% were esophageal adenocarcinomas; 31% were poorly differentiated tumors while 68% had clinical or pathological node positive disease. Complete R0 resection occurred in 93%, and 84% had received perioperative therapy (31% with perioperative chemotherapy; 40% with pre-operative chemoradiation; 9% with post-operative chemoradiation). With a median follow-up time of 26.0 months. relapse rate of HPGEC at last follow-up was 78%. Among first relapses, 94% were distant, while 6% were local recurrences. Among distant relapses, visceral recurrences occurred in 85%, nonvisceral in 3%, and 12% patients had both visceral and nonvisceral recurrences. None had peritoneal only recurrence. Median TTR was 12.2 months (IQR 8.8, 23.5), while median post-recurrence survival was 9.7 months (IQR 4.7, 16.3). Of the entire cohort, 2-year OS was 53% and 3-year OS was 26%. Conclusions: More than three-quarters of patients with HPGEC experienced recurrence after curative intent multimodality therapy. Our results suggest that HPGEC rarely relapse with peritoneal only disease or local recurrence, thereby calling into question the utility for aggressive surveillance, pending verification from larger cohorts.

163 Background: Older adults are under-represented or excluded from pivotal trials of palliative chemotherapy for metastatic gastric and esophageal (GE) cancers. Little is known about how older patients are treated in the real world. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of age on treatment and survival. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years were identified from a retrospective database of patients with metastatic GE cancer (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; 2011-2016). The impact of age ≥75 years (old-old) versus (vs.) 65-74 years (young-old) on treatment and survival was assessed using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively, adjusted for known prognostic factors including sex, comorbidity, primary site, histology, grade, stage at initial diagnosis, metastatic sites, and chemotherapy use. Results: Of 183 patients, median age was 72 (range 65-92) years; 31% were old-old. Old-old patients were less likely to be treated with any chemotherapy (12.3% vs. 45.2% young-old; adjusted odds ratio = 0.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.31)). With a median follow-up of 5.7 months, 135 (74%) had died during follow-up; median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months (mo) for the old-old vs. 8.4 mo (young-old). There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups after adjustment for known prognostic factors (old-old vs. young-old: univariable hazard ratio (HR) 1.75 (95% CI 1.2-2.5); adjusted HR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.7). Treatment with any chemotherapy was associated with an improvement in survival: adjusted HR 0.34 (95%CI 0.22-0.52). Conclusions: In this single-centre study of older adults with metastatic GE cancer, there was an overall low rate of treatment with chemotherapy; those ≥75 were rarely treated. After accounting for known prognostic factors, there was no observed difference in survival between patients ≥75 and those 65 to 74. Comprehensive geriatric assessment may improve treatment selection in the older population. [Table: see text]

131 Background: The landmark ToGA trial established trastuzumab (T) based therapy as the standard of care for advanced HER2+ gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, outcomes for T based therapy for HER2+ esophageal cancer have not been well characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients (pts) with HER2+ gastroesophageal cancer receiving T based therapy at our institution from 2011-2016. Distal esophagus ( < 35 cm) and Siewert type I/II tumours were defined as esophageal (E). Siewert type III and stomach tumours were defined as gastric (G). Trained abstractors collected pt demographics and treatment details. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of first T treatment. Chi-square tests, t-tests and Cox proportional hazards models were applied where appropriate. Results: We identified 87 pts with advanced HER2+ disease. 62% (n = 54) had de novo metastatic (M1) disease. 57 patients were treated with T based therapy, with median age 57 years (IQR 48-67), 91% baseline performance status 0-1, 19% female, and 7% Asian. 63% (n = 36) had E and 37% (n = 21) had G primary tumours. 67% (n = 38) presented with M1 disease. 33% (n = 19) underwent surgery with curative intent and received T based therapy at recurrence. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the E and G groups. Survival data were available for 51 patients. The E and G groups did not have significant differences in PFS (median 9.5 vs. 9.1 months, HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.44-1.80), p = 0.74) or in OS (median 15.8 vs. 14.2 months, HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.42-1.82), p = 0.73). 63% (n = 36) were treated with subsequent systemic therapy after progression on T, with 23 receiving one line, 9 receiving two lines and 4 receiving three additional lines of treatment. The number subsequent therapies received was similar between E and G groups. Conclusions: Although patients with distal esophagus tumours were not included in the ToGA trial, our analysis suggests that patients with E and G tumours had similar outcomes. Our contemporary cohort had comparable survival outcomes relative to patients receiving T in the ToGA trial (median PFS = 6.7 months, median OS = 13.8 months).

122 Background: There are no phase 3 trials comparing definitive chemoradiation (bimodality) versus. perioperative chemoradiation (trimodality) for locoregional esophageal/GEJ cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis (2011-2015) compared bimodality and trimodality therapy in patients (pts) with locoregional esophageal/GEJ cancer treated with curative intent. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated from the date of diagnosis. Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for patient and disease factors. Results: Of 108 patients, 82 (76%) were male. Mean ages were 69.5 ± 11.0 years (bimodality; N = 41) and 60.5 ± 11.1 years (trimodality; N = 67). For bimodality pts, 37% had adenocarcinoma and 63% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). For trimodality pts, 79% had adenocarcinoma and 21% had SCC (p < 0.0001). Bimodality pts received a higher radiation dose compared to trimodality pts (50.1 ± 6.7 vs. 45.2 ± 6.4 Gy). Median follow-up was 49.3 months. We found no significant OS difference between bimodality (27.0 months) and trimodality therapy (29.8 months) in the overall cohort (p = 0.57) (4 year OS rate: 42% vs. 38%). In the subgroup with adenocarcinoma histology, trimodality therapy significantly improved OS and DFS compared to bimodality (OS: 31.8 vs. 10.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.66, p = 0.001; DFS: 15.0 vs. 6.7 months; HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.73, p = 0.003). In the SCC subgroup, median OS and DFS were similar (OS: not reached vs. 29.2 months, p = 0.48; DFS: 27.0 vs. 24.0, p = 0.96). Using multivariable regression with AIC backward selection, the only retained prognostic factors were treatment modality (p = 0.06) and histology (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings support preferential use of trimodality therapy for pts with adenocarcinoma histology given superior OS and DFS, whereas bimodality and trimodality therapy appeared comparable in pts with SCC histology. Pending confirmation in a larger series with longer follow-up, these findings suggest differential treatment algorithms for locoregional esophageal and GEJ cancer based on tumor histology.