Search

Background: Givinostat (ITF2357), an oral, synthetic histone deacetylase inhibitor, significantly improved all histological muscle biopsy parameters in a Phase II study in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)., Research Design and Methods: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, including seven clinical studies, was developed to explore the effect of covariates on givinostat PK. The final model was qualified to simulate pediatric dosing recommendations. A PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed to simulate the link between givinostat plasma concentration and platelet time course in 10-70-kg children following 6 months of givinostat 20-70 mg twice daily., Results: A two-compartment model, with first-order input with lag and first-order elimination from the central compartment, described givinostat PK, demonstrating increasing apparent clearance with increasing body weight. The PK/PD model well-described platelet count time course. Weight-based dosing (arithmetic mean systemic exposure of 554-641 ng·h/mL) produced an average platelet count decrease from baseline of 45% with maximum decrease within 28 days. After 1 week and 6 months, ~1% and ~14-15% of patients, respectively, had a platelet count <75 × 10 9 /L., Conclusions: Based on these data, givinostat dosing will be body weight adjusted and include monitoring of platelet counts to support efficacy and safety in a Phase III DMD study.

Background: PHA-793887 is an inhibitor of multiple cyclin dependent kinases (CDK) with activity against CDK2, CDK1 and CDK4. The primary objectives of this first in man study were to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of PHA-793887., Results: Although toxicity was acceptable at initial dose levels, PHA-793887 was poorly tolerated at doses ≥44 mg/m2. The most frequent events across all dose levels were gastrointestinal or nervous system events. DLTs were experienced by two of three patients at the dose level of 66 mg/m2, and by three of nine patients at the dose level of 44 mg/m2. In all but one patient the DLT was hepatotoxicity; fatal hepatorenal failure was seen in one patient treated at the 44 mg/ m2 dose level. There were no objective responses, but disease stabilization was observed in five patients. Over the dose range investigated, pharmacokinetic studies showed that systemic exposure to PHA-793887 increased with the dose and was time-independent. The study terminated after the enrolment of 19 patients due to the severe hepatic toxicity., Patients and Methods: Cohorts of three to six patients were treated at doses of 11, 22, 44 and 66 mg/m2 of PHA-793887 administered as 1-hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 4-week cycle. Safety and pharmacokinetics were investigated., Conclusion: PHA-793887 induces severe, dose-related hepatic toxicity, which was not predicted by pre-clinical models and currently precludes its further clinical development.

Purpose: The purpose is to determine a safe weekly dose of i.v. estramustine phosphate (EMP) to combine with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer., Experimental Design: Patients with advanced prostate cancer (castrate and noncastrate) were administered escalating doses of weekly 1-h infusion of i.v. EMP (500-1000-1500 mg/m(2)) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and i.v. carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml-min every 4 weeks). Four weeks of therapy were considered one cycle. In the first three cohorts, EMP was given i.v. 3 h before paclitaxel. Cohorts 4 and 5 reversed the administration order: EMP (doses 1000-1500 mg/m(2)) was given immediately after the end of paclitaxel infusion. Plasma levels of EMP and its metabolites, estramustine and estromustine, were monitored at time 0, at 120 min, and approximately at 20, 21, and 168 h from the start of EMP infusion. Paclitaxel concentrations were determined at basal (0), 30, 60, 90, and 120 min and 18 h after the start of paclitaxel infusion, and a concentration-time curve was estimated. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed in cycles 1 and 2 during the first week of therapy., Results: Nineteen patients were entered on the initial three dose levels (cohorts 1-3). Dose-limiting transient hepatic toxicity was encountered in cohort 3 (EMP = 1500 mg/m(2)). An additional 13 patients were treated with paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) first, followed by i.v. EMP at 1000 mg/m(2) (cohort 4), and 1500 mg/m(2) (cohort 5). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen, and cohort 5 was determined safe for Phase II studies. Thromboembolic events were observed in 9% of patients (no prophylactic coumadin was used). Plasma concentrations of EMP and metabolites increased proportionally with dose. In all cohorts, there was a slight decrease in EMP and estramustine plasma concentrations between cycles 1 and 2. Although not significant, higher levels of estromustine at cycle 2 were observed in comparison to cycle 1. Decreased clearance of paclitaxel leading to higher than expected paclitaxel plasma concentrations was observed during the first cycle of therapy. Paclitaxel plasma concentrations were lower during cycle 2. In 17 patients with androgen-independent disease, 59% had >/=50% posttherapy decline in PSA and 22% showed measurable disease regression., Conclusions: The regimen of weekly i.v. EMP in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered with hepatic toxicity being transient and reversible. Pharmacokinetic results suggest that EMP competitively inhibits the biotransformation of paclitaxel after the first administration. This effect is counterbalanced, after repeated administrations, by a possible induction of the metabolic system caused by EMP. Phase II testing is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.

Background: Reboxetine [(R,S)-2[(R,S)-alpha-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)benzyl]morpholine methanesulfonate] is a racemic compound that consists of equal proportions of R,R- and S,S-enantiomers. This study investigated the hemodynamic effects of reboxetine and the R,R-enantiomer compared with placebo in volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of reboxetine and its enantiomers were also investigated in the study., Methods: Nine healthy, male volunteers received single doses of 4 mg reboxetine, 2 mg R,R-enantiomer, and placebo at weekly intervals. Reboxetine and the R,R-enantiomer were well tolerated in all volunteers., Results: The heart rates of patients in the supine and standing positions were increased after reboxetine administration compared with the R,R-enantiomer (P < .05, except supine heart rate at 6 hours) and placebo (P < .05). Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure was also increased by 3 +/- 4 and 1 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively, after reboxetine compared with R,R-enantiomer (-2 +/- 4 and -4 +/- 3 mm Hg) and placebo (-4 +/- 4 and -4 +/- 4 mm Hg) administration. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements for subjects while standing did not differ significantly among treatments. There was no significant difference between the maximum plasma concentration, mean time to maximum plasma concentration, plasma half-life, or area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the R,R-enantiomer after reboxetine or R,R-enantiomer administration. The ratio of the mean AUC values for the R,R- and S,S-enantiomers was 2.1., Conclusion: These findings suggest that the S,S-enantiomer is responsible for the hemodynamic effects of reboxetine in humans. Increases in supine blood pressure after reboxetine administration may be interpreted as regression to the mean value and not caused by any treatment effect.

The absolute bioavailability of reboxetine enantiomers was assessed in six male and six female volunteers. In a two-way crossover study, subjects received 1.0 mg reboxetine orally and 0.3 mg reboxetine as an intravenous bolus. The R,R(-) and S,S(+) enantiomers in serial plasma and urine samples were determined by a validated LC-MS-MS method. There were no significant differences between treatments for clearance or dose-corrected AUC(0-infinity) values. The absolute bioavailability was 0.919 and 1.02 for R,R(-) reboxetine and S,S(+) reboxetine, respectively. A secondary objective of the study was to assess gender effects on pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers. Significant differences in volume of distribution between genders were observed, but differences in weight-corrected volumes were not significant. Weight-corrected systemic clearance and oral clearance tended to be lower in males, but this difference reached statistical significance only for weight-corrected oral clearance of R,R(-) reboxetine. C(max) after oral administration was 40 and 48% higher in women than men for R,R(-) reboxetine and S,S(+) reboxetine, respectively. These results indicate that reboxetine enantiomers are well absorbed after oral administration and that little first-pass metabolism occurs. There are no clinically significant effects of gender on the pharmacokinetics of reboxetine enantiomers.

Reboxetine, (RS)-2-[(RS)-alpha-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)benzyl]morpholine methanesulphonate, is a racemic compound and consists of a mixture of the (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers. In this study, brain and plasma levels of both enantiomers were determined in mice and rats after oral administration of reboxetine at doses (1.1 mg/kg, mouse; 20 mg/kg, rat) twice the respective ED50 values in the antireserpine test. Plasma and brain concentrations of each enantiomer were measured up to 6 h postdosing using an HPLC method with fluorimetric detection after derivatization with a chiral agent (FLEC). In mice and rats, brain and plasma levels of the (R,R)-enantiomer were always higher than those of the (S,S)-enantiomer. After normalization for dose, the mean AUC0-tz values of both the (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers in mouse brain were about 23 and 32 times higher than in rat brain, respectively. In plasma, the corrected mean AUC0-tz values were about 5 (R,R) and 10 (S,S) times higher in mice than in rats. These results provide evidence for the higher bioavailability and/or lower clearance of both enantiomers in mice than in rats, and for a higher penetration of both enantiomers into mouse brain compared to rat brain.