Search

Muscle strains are one of the most common sports-induced injuries. Depending on the severity and location of the muscle strain, different treatment approaches can be taken. This review highlights recent trends in conservative, pharmacologic, and surgical approaches to the management of sports-induced muscle injuries as presented at a symposium held during the 93rd Annual Congress of the Italian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SIOT) in Rome, Italy in November 2008. Conservative approaches now include growth factor therapy and administration of autologous platelet-rich plasma during the early postinjury period; however, its use is currently considered a doping violation under the World Anti-Doping Agency code, therefore restricting its use to nonelite sports people only. Topical anti-inflammatory therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy, since it allows local analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects while minimizing systemic adverse events. As the drug delivery system is critical to clinical effectiveness, the advent of a new delivery system for ketoprofen via a new-generation plaster with a marked increase in tissue penetration and a clinical efficacy comparable with that of oral administration, provides a viable option in the treatment of single sport lesions. Surgical treatment of muscle lesions is less common than conservative and topical therapies and indications are limited to more serious injuries. Presentations from SIOT 2008 show that advances in our understanding of the healing process and in conservative, pharmacologic, and surgical treatment approaches to the management of sports-induced muscle strains contribute to better clinical outcomes, faster healing, and a swifter return to normal training and activity levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Increased BMI is associated with a higher risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease., Aims: To investigate whether overweight/obesity (BMI≥25 kg/m(2)) affects rabeprazole clinical efficacy versus omeprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE)., Patients and Methods: Post-hoc analysis of EE healing rate and symptom response stratified by patient BMI was performed on data from a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 4-to-8-week trial comparing EE healing with rabeprazole (20 mg daily) and omeprazole (20 mg daily). Analysis of variance, two-sample t-test, Blackwelder's test for equivalence, log-rank, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were used to analyze comparisons., Results: In the two BMI groups (<25 kg/m(2) and ≥25 kg/m(2) respectively), rabeprazole and omeprazole were equally effective for mucosal healing regardless of patient's BMI (N=542, P>0.05). However, in overweight/obese patients, rabeprazole was significantly faster than omeprazole in inducing heartburn relief during the first treatment week (P<0.0001)., Conclusions: Results of this study show that the clinical efficacy of rabeprazole is maintained in overweight/obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and suggest that this subgroup of patients may derive, from rabeprazole, even greater benefit than lean patients.

The following on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and chemoprevention in relation to Barrett's esophagus includes commentaries on 48-h pH monitoring, pH-impedence, bile acid testing, dyspepsia, long/short segment Barrett's esophagus, nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), functional heartburn, dual-release delivery PPIs, immediate-release PPIs, long-term PPI use, prokinetic agents, obesity, baclofen, nocturnal acid breakthrough, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and new PPIs., (© 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.)

The dramatic success of pharmacological acid suppression in healing peptic ulcers and managing patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reflected in the virtual abolition of elective surgery for ulcer disease, a reduction in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated gastropathy and the decision by most patients with reflux symptoms to continue medical therapy rather than undergo surgical intervention. However, a number of challenges remain in the management of acid-related disorders. These include management of patients with gastroesophageal symptoms who do not respond adequately to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, treatment of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding, optimal treatment and prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal injury, and optimal combination of antisecretory and antibiotic therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. A number of new drugs are currently being investigated to provide a significant advance on current treatments. Some of them (namely potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) and CCK2-receptor antagonists) have already reached clinical testing while some others (like the antigastrin vaccine, H3-receptor ligands or gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonists) are still in preclinical development and need the proof of concept in human beings. Of the current approaches to reduce acid secretion, P-CABs and CCK2-receptor antagonists hold the greatest promise, with several compounds already in clinical trials. Although the quick onset of action of P-CABs (i.e. a full effect from the first dose) is appealing, the results of phase II studies with one such agent (namely AZD0865) did not show any advantages over esomeprazole. Thanks to their limited efficacy and the development of tolerance it is unlikely that CCK2 antagonists will be used alone as antisecretory compounds but, rather, their combination with PPIs will be attempted with the aim of reducing the long-term consequences of hypergastrinemia. While H2-receptor antagonists (especially soluble or over-the-counter formulations) will become the 'antacids of the third millennium' and will be particularly useful for on-demand symptom relief, clinicians will continue to rely on PPIs to control acid secretion in GERD and other acid-related diseases. In this connection, several new PPI formulations have been developed and two novel drugs (namely ilaprazole and tenatoprazole) are being studied in humans. The recently introduced immediate-release (IR) omeprazole formulation (currently available only in the USA) quickly increases intragastric pH and, given at bedtime, seems to achieve a better control of nocturnal acidity. IR formulations of other PPIs (including the investigational ones) will probably be available in the future and will enlarge our therapeutic armamentarium. Amongst the novel PPIs, tenatoprazole appears to be a true advance in the acid suppression therapy. Its long half-life (the longest among the available compounds) and longer duration of antisecretory action, with no difference between day and night, will allow the drug to go beyond the intrinsic limitations of currently available PPIs. Thanks to its favorable pharmacokinetics, the sodium salt of S-tenatoprazole is being developed and the preliminary results indicate that this drug has the potential to address unmet clinical needs. Although some decades have elapsed since the introduction of effective and safe antisecretory drugs in clinical practice and their use has stood the test of time, the ongoing research will further provide the clinician with more effective means of controlling acid secretion., (Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Rifaximin (4-deoxy-4'-methylpyrido[1',2'-1,2]imidazo [5,4-c]rifamycin SV) is a product of synthesis experiments designed to modify the parent compound, rifamycin, in order to achieve low gastrointestinal (GI) absorption while retaining good antibacterial activity. Both experimental and clinical pharmacology clearly show that this compound is a non-systemic antibiotic with a broad spectrum of antibacterial action covering Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, both aerobes and anaerobes. Being virtually non-absorbed, its bioavailability within the GI tract is rather high with intraluminal and fecal drug concentrations that largely exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration values observed in vitro against a wide range of pathogenic organisms. The GI tract represents therefore the primary therapeutic target and GI infections the main indication. This antibiotic has therefore little value outside the enteric area and this will minimize both antimicrobial resistance and systemic adverse events. Indeed, the drug proved to be safe in all patient populations, including young children. The appreciation of the pathogenic role of gut bacteria in several organic and functional GI diseases has increasingly broadened its clinical use, which is now extended to hepatic encephalopathy, small intestine bacterial overgrowth, inflammatory bowel disease and colonic diverticular disease., (Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Rifaximin (4-deoxy-4'-methylpyrido[1',2'-1,2]imidazo- [5,4-c]-rifamycin SV) is a synthetic antibiotic designed to modify the parent compound, rifamycin, in order to achieve low gastrointestinal (GI) absorption while retaining good antibacterial activity. Both experimental and clinical pharmacology clearly show that this compound is a nonsystemic antibiotic with a broad spectrum of antibacterial action covering Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, both aerobes and anaerobes. Being virtually nonabsorbed, its bioavailability within the GI tract is rather high with intraluminal and fecal drug concentrations that largely exceed the minimal inhibitory concentration values observed in vitro against a wide range of pathogenic organisms. The GI tract represents, therefore, the primary therapeutic target and GI infections the main indication. The appreciation of the pathogenic role of gut bacteria in several organic and functional GI diseases has increasingly broadened its clinical use, which is now extended to hepatic encephalopathy, small intestine bacterial overgrowth, inflammatory bowel disease and colonic diverticular disease. Potential indications include the irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation, Clostridium difficile infection and bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Because of its antibacterial activity against the microorganism and the lack of strains with primary resistance, some preliminary studies have explored the rifaximin potential for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Oral administration of this drug, by getting rid of enteric bacteria, could also be employed to achieve selective bowel decontamination in acute pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis (thus preventing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (lessening in that way NSAID enteropathy). This antibiotic has, therefore, little value outside the enteric area and this will minimize both antimicrobial resistance and systemic adverse events. Indeed, the drug proved to be safe in all patient populations, including young children. Although rifaximin has stood the test of time, it still attracts the attention of both basic scientists and clinicians. As a matter of fact, with the advancement of the knowledge on microbial-gut interactions in health and disease novel indications and new drug regimens are being explored. Besides widening the clinical use, the research on rifaximin is also focused on the synthesis of new derivatives and on the development of original formulations designed to expand the spectrum of its clinical use., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed semisynthetic rifamycin derivative with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, both aerobes and anaerobes. Although originally developed for the treatment of infectious diarrhea, the appreciation of the pathogenic role of gut bacteria in several organic and functional gastrointestinal diseases has increasingly broadened its clinical use. The availability of a topical formulation (a cream containing 5% of the drug) and the lack of transcutaneous absorption pointed out in both animal and human studies has allowed its topical use in skin infections. Furthermore, since the spectrum of antibacterial action of rifaximin includes many organisms (e.g. Bacteroides bivius-disiens, Gardnerella vaginalis, Haemophilus ducreyi) causing genital infections, including Trichomonas vaginalis and Chlamydia trachomatis, its local application in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV) has been attempted. Finally, since periodontal disease, caused by plaque (an aggregate of various bacteria), can be considered a 'local' infection, intrapocket rifaximin was tried in the treatment of periodontal infections. While the efficacy in pyogenic infections of the skin has been confirmed by several investigations, which showed an improvement of both subjective and objective parameters significantly better than that of the reference drug (i.e. chlortetracycline or oxytetracycline), the usefulness of rifaximin in BV and periodontal disease needs to be further studied in well-designed clinical trials., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Due to the limited efficacy and considerable toxicity of conventional chemotherapy, novel cytotoxic agents and innovative noncytotoxic approaches to cancer treatment are being developed. Amongst the various hormonal agents, increasing attention is being directed to somatostatin analogs. This is largely due to the demonstration of antineoplastic activity of these compounds in a variety of experimental models in vitro and in vivo and to the elucidation of some aspects of the molecular mechanisms underlying their antineoplastic activity. On the other hand, clinical experience with somatostatin analogs in the treatment of conditions like acromegaly and GEP tumors has shown that they are well tolerated compared to other antineoplastic therapies currently in use. As a consequence, there is much ongoing clinical research to determine whether or not results from experimental studies will translate into clinically useful antineoplastic activity. Besides being used in cancer treatment and palliation, radiolabelled somatostatin analogs are employed for the localization of primary and metastatic tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The so-called 'somatostatin receptor scintigraphy' is indeed the most important clinical diagnostic investigation for patients with suspected neuroendocrine tumors. Targeted radiotherapy, which is being evaluated in clinical trials, represents an obvious extension of somatostatin scintigraphy. Since the short half-life of native somatostatin makes continuous intravenous infusion mandatory, several long-acting analogs have been synthesized. Amongst the hundreds of peptides synthesized, octreotide (which binds mainly to SSTR-2 and SSTR-5 receptor subtypes) has been the most extensively investigated. A thorough analysis of the pharmacological activities and therapeutic efficacy of the native somatostatin and the synthetic analogs (octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide) reveals that the biological actions of these peptides are not always identical. These differences appear to be related to the different affinities of the natural hormone and synthetic derivatives for the different receptor subtypes. For all the three peptides long-lasting formulations have been developed to provide patients with the convenience of once or twice a month administration and to ensure stable drug serum concentrations between injections. Radiolabelled derivatives of octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide have been synthesized and used as radiopharmaceuticals for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor-targeted radiotherapy. The safety profile of synthetic somatostatin analogs is well established. Most adverse reactions to these peptides are merely a consequence of their pharmacological activity and consist mainly of gastrointestinal complaints, cholelithiasis and effects on glucose metabolism. They are often of little clinical relevance, thus making somatostatin analogs safe drugs for long-term use. While immediate release preparations are the drugs of choice in the short term, long-acting formulations are better indicated, on an outpatient basis, for the long-term management of chronic conditions. New 'receptor-selective' and 'universal' somatostatin analogs are being developed and combinations of currently available derivatives with other (cytotoxic and/or hormonal) agents are being explored in the search for an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment of the various malignancies. Somatostatin receptor-targeted chemotherapy (with conjugates of somatostatin peptides with cytotoxic drugs) and gene therapy (e.g. transferring the SSTR-2 gene into neoplastic cells), which have been successfully tested in experimental studies, should be applied to human beings in a not too distant future., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Although it is unclear to what extent irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms represent a normal perception of abnormal function or an abnormal perception of normal function, many believe that IBS constitutes the clinical expression of an underlying motility disorder, affecting primarily the mid- and lower gut. Indeed, transit and contractile abnormalities have been demonstrated with sophisticated techniques in a subset of patients with IBS. As a consequence, drugs affecting gastrointestinal (GI) motility have been widely employed with the aim of correcting the major IBS manifestations, ie, pain and altered bowel function. Unfortunately, no single drug has proven to be effective in treating IBS symptom complex. In addition, the use of some medications has often been associated with unpleasant side effects. Therefore, the search for a truly effective and safe drug to control motility disturbances in IBS continues. Several classes of drugs look promising and are under evaluation. Among the motor-inhibiting drugs, gut selective muscarinic antagonists (such as zamifenacin and darifenacin), neurokinin2 antagonists (such as MEN-10627 and MEN-11420), beta3-adrenoreceptor agonists (eg, SR-58611A) and GI-selective calcium channel blockers (eg, pinaverium bromide and octylonium) are able to decrease painful contractile activity in the gut (antispasmodic effect), without significantly affecting other body functions. Novel mechanisms to stimulate GI motility and transit include blockade of cholecystokinin (CCK)A receptors and stimulation of motilin receptors. Loxiglumide (and its dextroisomer, dexloxiglumide) is the only CCKA receptor antagonist that is being evaluated clinically. This drug accelerates gastric emptying and colonic transit, thereby increasing the number of bowel movements in patients with chronic constipation. It is also able to reduce visceral perception. Erythromycin and related 14-member macrolide compounds inhibit the binding of motilin to its receptors on GI smooth muscle and, therefore, act as motilin agonists. This antibiotic accelerates gastric emptying and shortens orocecal transit time. In the large bowel a significant decrease in transit is observed only in the right colon, which suggests a shift in fecal distribution. Several 'motilinomimetics' have been synthesized. Their development depends on the lack of antimicrobial activity and the absence of fading of the prokinetic effect during prolonged administration. 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 agonists with significant pharmacological effects on the mid- and distal gut (such as prucalopride and tegaserod) are available for human use. These 'enterokinetic' compounds are useful for treating constipation-predominant IBS patients. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists also possess a number of interesting pharmacological properties that may make them suitable for treatment of IBS. Besides decreasing colonic sensitivity to distension, these drugs prolong intestinal transit and may be particularly useful in diarrhea-predominant IBS. Finally, when administered in small pulsed doses, octreotide, besides reducing the perception of rectal distension, accelerates intestinal transit, although other evidence disputes such an effect.

Somatostatin, a naturally occurring peptide, displays a wide range of biological actions, mainly inhibitory ones, that can make it an appropriate drug for the treatment of a variety of digestive diseases. The marked effect of the peptide on splanchnic hemodynamics together with its inhibitory action on acid-peptic and pancreatic exocrine secretions represent the rationale for the use in upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and surgical conditions of the pancreas. Besides the hemodynamic effects, other pharmacological actions of somatostatin may contribute to its therapeutic efficacy in active variceal bleeding. The peptide indeed increases lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), thereby reducing the inflow of blood into the submucous venous plexus of the esophagus and hence into the esophageal varices. Through its inhibitory action on acid-peptic secretion, somatostatin may also inhibit peptic digestion of the clot at the site of hemostasis on the varix itself. In addition, the natural peptide was shown to enhance human platelet aggregation in vitro, whose stimulation can activate the hemostatic process. Since its short half-life makes continuous intravenous infusion mandatory, several long-acting analogs have been synthesized. Amongst the hundreds of cyclic peptides synthesised, octreotide (which binds mainly to SSTR-2 and SSTR-5 receptor subtypes) has been the most extensively investigated. A thorough analysis of the pharmacological activities and therapeutic efficacy of the native somatostatin and the synthetic analogs reveals that the biological actions of these peptides are not always identical. These differences appear to be related to the different affinities of the natural hormone and synthetic derivatives for the different receptor subtypes. The fading of the pharmacological effect, which has yet been observed only with analogs, has never been reported with the natural peptide and may be due to down-regulation of specific receptor subtypes. The safety profile of both natural somatostatin and synthetic analogs is today well established. Most adverse reactions to these peptides are merely a consequence of their pharmacological activity and consist mainly of gastrointestinal complaints and effects on glucose metabolism. They are often of little clinical relevance, especially in the short term. Native somatostatin and its synthetic analogs are therefore safe and effective drugs for the treatment of a variety of GI disorders. While the native peptide is the drug of choice in the acute hospital setting, the synthetic derivatives are better indicated, on outpatient basis, for the long-term management of chronic conditions., (Copyright 1999 S. Karger, AG, Basel.)

Gastro-duodenal mucosa possesses an array of defensive mechanisms and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a deleterious effect on most of them. This results in a mucosa less able to cope with even a reduced acid load. The presence of acid appears to be a conditio sine qua non for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-injury, which is in fact pH-dependent. The acute damage induced by acid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, like aspirin, can be markedly reduced or even prevented by raising intragastric pH with antacids or antisecretory compounds. Animal studies have clearly shown that not only the degree, but also the duration, of acid inhibition is an important factor for prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced mucosal damage. As a consequence, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appear to be more effective that H2-receptor antagonists both in preventing and treating gastro-duodenal lesions. While acid suppression seems to be the only effective mechanism for ulcer healing, prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-injury might also rely on the mucosal protective activity of these compounds. Clinical pharmacological studies, performed in healthy volunteers, have shown that--as in laboratory animals--elevation of intragastric pH by means of antacids or antisecretory compounds protects against acute NSAID-induced damage. Unlike H2-blockers, PPIs protect from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-injury not only the duodenum, but also the stomach, where the majority of mucosal lesions are usually located. Although elevation of intragastric pH affects non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in laboratory animals, a lack of drug-to-drug interaction between PPIs and some of these compounds has been reported in humans. To summarize, clinical and experimental pharmacology support the use of PPIs for the prevention and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastro-duodenal damage. Acid suppression could, however, represent only one of the many mechanisms by which these compounds protect gastro-duodenal mucosa. Further studies are, therefore, needed to better elucidate the respective role of the various pharmacological actions in their mucosal protective activity as well as to assess the clinical relevance of each of them.

1. It is now well established that cholecystokinin (CCK) has a major physiological role in the regulation of pancreatic secretion and gastro-intestinal (GI) motility. Both these actions are mediated by stimulation of CCK(A)-receptors located on pancreatic acini and GI smooth muscle cells. While chronic administration of CCK-like peptides invariably causes pancreatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia, their action on gastric growth remains controversial. 2. In the present investigation the action of exogenous and endogenous CCK on both pancreatic and gastric growth was studied in the same animal. In addition, the ability of dexloxiglumide, a new potent and selective CCK(A)-receptor antagonist, to counteract CCK-mediated effects was evaluated. 3. The amphibian peptide caerulein (1 microg kg(-1) intraperitoneally three times daily) was used as a CCK agonist, while camostate (200 mg kg(-1) intragastrically once daily), a synthetic protease inhibitor, was used to release endogenous CCK. They were administered to rats for seven days with or without dexloxiglumide (25 mg kg(-1) subcutaneously 15 min before the stimulus). On the eighth day, animals were killed, the pancreas and stomach excised, weighed, homogenized and their protein and DNA content measured. 4. Both exogenous and endogenous CCK increased the weight of the pancreas as well as the total pancreatic protein and DNA content. Dexloxiglumide, which alone did not affect pancreatic size and composition, was able to counteract both caerulein- and camostate-induced pancreatic changes. Neither stimuli affected gastric growth in respect of weight and composition of the oxyntic gland area and the antrum. 5. These results show different effects of CCK on pancreatic and gastric growth. The CCK-induced pancreatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia are blocked by the potent and specific CCK(A)-receptor antagonist, dexloxiglumide. This compound therefore represents a useful tool to investigate CCK-receptor interactions in peripheral organs.