Search

Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Surgeons still face difficulties when performing aseptic acetabular revision on patients with extensive defects. Advances in three-dimensional printing technology (3DP) have afforded to the surgeons to create a patient-specific implant matching the morphology and topography of the defect. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current research was to determine the survivorship in the treatment of acetabular bone defects with pelvic discontinuity (PD). METHODS: In order to reconstruct Paprosky type III defects with PD, twenty-three patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilizing 3D-printed implants (Mobelife). The primary outcomes were the implant-associated failure rate correlated with survivorship. As secondary variables, complications and the effect of age, sex, comorbidities, history of infections and the presence of other lower limb arthroplasties on a new revision were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were followed out to a mean of 67.22 ± 39.44 months (range, 0.9–127 months). Mobelife implant mean survival was 102.57 ± 9.90 months (95% CI 83.17–121.96). The cohort's implant one-year survival rate was 87%; at ten years, it dropped to 78.3%. There were four revisions: three due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one case due to aseptic loosening. Cox regression analysis did not identify any variable as predictor of failure. CONCLUSION: The use of 3DP patient-specific acetabular components has shown encouraging results and it is a viable treatment option for addressing acetabular defects with combined PD in aseptic THA revision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment constructs have demonstrated favorable outcomes up to 5 years postsurgery despite severe bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior literature lacks long-term studies with substantial case numbers. This study aims to assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes 10 years postsurgery in patients undergoing revision THA with porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs and determine factors associated with long-term survivorship. Between 2000 and 2012, 157 revision THAs were performed in cases with major acetabular defects (mainly Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) utilizing porous tantalum cup-augment constructs. Pelvic discontinuity was noted intraoperatively in 17 hips (11%). Postoperative radiographs were evaluated at regular intervals for implant stability and radiolucent lines. There were 49 patients who had complete radiographic follow-up at 10 years or longer postsurgery. The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the cup-augment construct for aseptic loosening was 93%, free of any acetabular construct revision was 91%, free of any hip rerevision was 77%, and free of any reoperation was 75%. Pelvic discontinuity was associated with increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8), any hip rerevision (HR = 3.2), any cup-augment construct revision (HR = 11.8), and aseptic construct revision (HR = 10.0). Of unrevised cases with radiographs at 10 years, 4 hips showed radiographic loosening. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 47 preoperatively to 79 at 10 years. Porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs used in revision THA with severe acetabular bone loss provide excellent implant survivorship at 10 years when the acetabulum is intact. Due to lower survivorship of cup-augment constructs in cases of pelvic discontinuity, additional construct fixation or stabilization methods are recommended, when a discontinuity is present. IV [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Acetabular reconstruction is a challenging problem in orthopaedic oncology, especially in extended defects (Paprosky Type 3A and Type 3B). In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), 1 option is trabecular metal (TM) augments with a porous metal acetabular component. This study evaluated the use of TM augments in periacetabular malignant bone disease. Methods: 15 patients were identified from our institutional database from 2000 to 2020 with either Paprosky Type 3A or Type 3B acetabular bone loss due to periacetabular malignancies that underwent at least 1 complex THA reconstruction with TM augments. Postoperative complications were documented, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were analysed. Radiological loosening or revision of the acetabular component were defined as endpoints. Results: There were 7 primary and 8 metastatic cancer patients. 5 were Type 3A and 10 were Type 3B defects after tumour resection. The average follow-up time was 23.8 (range 1.5–47) months. 1 patient required revision for acetabular component loosening after 7 months from the initial implantation. An additional 4 patients required surgical intervention for infection, they had stable TM augments at latest follow-up. Conclusion: TM augments with a porous metal acetabular component may be an alternative to the traditional cemented constructs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acetabular reconstruction options in the setting of substantial bone deficiency (Paprosky 3A and 3B) remain limited. Custom triflange acetabular implants are one choice for this challenging problem. However, few studies have reported on survivorship beyond 3 to 5 years. The purpose of this study was to report our 6 to 13-year clinical results using these custom-made acetabular components. Between 2008 and March 2015, 42 revision total hip arthroplasties (41 patients) were performed at our institution with a custom triflange acetabular component. All revisions involved either Paprosky 3A or 3B acetabular defects. Two patients died before the five-year follow-up. Harris Hip Scores were obtained at 6 months, 1 year, and every 2 to 3 years thereafter. The average follow-up in the remaining 40 revision total hip arthroplasties was 10 years (range, 6 to 13 years). At the final follow-up, the mean Harris score was 74 points. There were two deep infections (5%). One custom implant was removed for deep infection (2.5%). Three hips (7.5%) experienced a total of four dislocations necessitating revision in one hip (femoral component only). One custom implant was judged to be loose. There were no cases of femoral nerve palsy. At final follow-up, 38 (95%) of the custom acetabular implants were considered radiographically stable. Instability and infection remain a major concern and cause of failure in these complex reconstructions. At an average follow-up of 10 years, however, custom triflange acetabular implants appear to work at least as well as jumbo cups and cup/cage constructs in the setting of extensive erosion of acetabular bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients who were revised using a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC) for component loosening and pelvic discontinuity (PD) after previous total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Data were extracted from a single centre prospective database of patients with PD who were treated with a CTAC. Patients were included if they had a follow-up of two years. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol EuroQoL five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at one- and two-year follow-up. Reasons for revision, and radiological and clinical complications were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance and clinical relevance. Results: A total of 18 females with 22 CTACs who had a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7) were included. A significant improvement was found in HOOS (p < 0.0001), mOHS (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D-3L utility (p = 0.003), EQ-5D-3L NRS (p = 0.013), VAS pain rest (p = 0.008), and VAS pain activity (p < 0.0001) between baseline and final follow-up. Minimal clinically important improvement in mOHS and the HOOS Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) was observed in 16 patients (73%) and 14 patients (64%), respectively. Definite healing of the PD was observed in 19 hips (86%). Complications included six cases with broken screws (27%), four cases (18%) with bony fractures, and one case (4.5%) with sciatic nerve paresthesia. One patient with concurrent bilateral PD had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage. Conclusion: CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and PD can result in stable constructs and significant improvement in functioning and health-related quality of life at two years' follow-up. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the mid- to long-term outcome. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):53–61.

AimsPelvic discontinuity is a rare but increasingly common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This single-centre study evaluated the performance of custom-made triflange acetabular components in acetabular reconstruction with pelvic discontinuity by determining: 1) revision and overall implant survival rates; 2) discontinuity healing rate; and 3) Harris Hip Score (HHS).MethodsRetrospectively collected data of 38 patients (39 hips) with pelvic discontinuity treated with revision THA using a custom-made triflange acetabular component were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was two years (mean 5.1 years (2 to 11)).ResultsThere were eight subsequent surgical interventions. Two failures (5%) of the triflange acetabular components were both revised because of deep infection. There were seven (18%) patients with dislocation, and five (13%) of these were treated with a constraint liner. One patient had a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure. In 34 (92%) hips the custom-made triflange component was considered stable, with a healed pelvic discontinuity with no aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. Mean HHS was 80.5 (48 to 96).ConclusionThe performance of the custom triflange implant in this study is encouraging, with high rates of discontinuity healing and osteointegration of the acetabular implant with no aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. However, complications are not uncommon, particularly instability which we successfully addressed with constrained liners.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):867–876.

Introduction: Acute pelvic discontinuity (PD) is a rare yet challenging complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although several techniques, such as plating of the posterior column and spanning of the discontinuity with a cup-cage have been described for the management of acute PD, few studies have determined the survivorship of acetabular constructs in this setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of acetabular fixation of the posterior column in patients who had acute PD following THA., Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 24 patients diagnosed with acute PD at a single institution from 2018 to 2022. All patients were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the discontinuity with a posterior column plate and highly porous cup. The primary outcome was acetabular component survivorship using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary outcomes included rates of radiographic union of the fracture, aseptic loosening, dislocation, and infection., Results: There were 17 women and seven men who had a mean age of 73 years (range, 50 to 89) included in the analysis. At 3.5 years (range, 1.0 to 6.2) follow-up, implant survivorship free from aseptic acetabular failure was 91.7% upon Kaplan-Meier analysis. There was one patient who underwent acetabular re-revision secondary to component loosening in the early postoperative period, while one patient had radiographic evidence of acetabular cup loosening at 1-year follow-up. No other revision procedures, periprosthetic fractures, prosthetic dislocations, or nerve injuries were reported. The overall complication rate was 20.8%. There were three patients who required irrigation and debridement, while two patients experienced medical complications., Conclusion: Posterior column plating with a highly porous acetabular cup can be a reliable treatment option for the management of acute PD. However, future studies with longer follow-ups comparing implant survivorship between posterior column plating and cup-cage constructs are necessary., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are a major challenge in orthopedics. Proper recognition of these complex cases helps to identify and treat patients with different presentations. These fractures can occur intraoperatively and be treated immediately, or they can occur postoperatively, following trauma or in the context of chronic low bone quality or associated implant loosening. The existing classification systems categorize these fractures as a function of the acetabular cup's stability and the context surrounding the fracture. When a fracture is detected intraoperatively, immediately analyzing its stability is crucial for choosing between a conservative strategy, the need for additional fixation, or the need to change the cup or use of an acetabular reinforcement ring. When the patient has symptoms such as persistent pain or instability, secondary diagnosis of a fracture requires diagnostic imaging. Its treatment depends on the cup's stability, with options ranging from conservative treatment with functional limitations, cup revision potentially combined with stabilization of the fracture site, and also management of potential periprosthetic bone defects. Traumatic fractures require a comprehensive assessment to determine whether the acetabular cup is still stable. The treatment may be conservative or surgical (internal fixation or cup revision). Chronic pelvic discontinuity is associated with bone loss and implant loosening. Acute pelvic discontinuity requires treatment tailored to each patient, often with acetabular rings or custom triflange cups to restore function. This article aims to provide an in-depth review of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, touching on their causes, classification, assessment and treatment, along with specific considerations for fractures diagnosed postoperatively and following acute trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; systematic review of level II-IV studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest NR received consulting fees from Amplitude, Adler Ortho, BBraun Aesculap, Mathys Enovis and is a member of the medical advisory board of Digikare. He is a board member of the SFHG., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no consensus on how to best address acetabular insufficiency. Several described techniques have a high rate of loosening and most rely on fixation to intact innominate bones. They also require extensive exposure and expensive implants. We present a novel technique for acetabular insufficiency management including discontinuity and a series with mean 6.5-year follow-up. Material and Methods: After exposure, a femoral neck osteotomy is made, or the femoral component is removed. Bone graft is reverse reamed into the defect, and a porous coated acetabular shell is implanted with screws for supplemental fixation. In 3-6 months, after defect healing, the femoral component is implanted. All staged total hip arthroplasties for pelvic discontinuity from 2010 to 2015 by a single provider with minimum 5-year follow-up were identified. Implant survivorship, Merle d’Aubinge, and visual analog scale scores as well as complications were recorded. Results: Nine patients were identified with mean 80.8-month follow-up (62-129). Merle D’Aubinge scores improved from 5.6 (4-8) to 15.3 (14-18), and Visual analog scale scores improved from 7.2 (6-9) to 0.8 (0-2). All implants were retained, and all patients were ambulatory at the terminal follow-up. There were 2 greater trochanter fractures, one calcar fracture managed with cerclage, and one patient developed heterotopic ossification. Conclusion: Staged total hip arthroplasty can be used to address pelvic discontinuity with excellent short- to mid-term outcomes. This technique allows for a more limited exposure and the use of primary hip implants. Fixation is by ingrowth and does not rely on intact pelvic architecture.

Purpose: Severe acetabular bone defect is challenging in revision hip arthroplasty. In the present study, we aimed to present new treatment options with the 3D printing technique and analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 3D-printed titanium implants for the treatment of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 35 patients with Paprosky type 3 bone defect and pelvic discontinuity (PD), who underwent hip revisions using 3D-printed titanium implants between 2016 and 2019 at our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-specific 3D-printed titanium augments and shells (strategy A) were used in 22 type 3A and two type 3B patients. Custom 3D-printed flanged components (strategy B) were used in 11 type 3B patients, including five PD. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Harris hip score (HHS). In addition, radiographic results were analyzed by the hip centre of rotation (V-COR and H-COR), implant failure, and survivorship. Results: The mean follow-up was 41.5 months (range, 16–62). The HHS was improved from 47.8 ± 8.2 pre-operatively to 78.1 ± 10.1 at one year follow-up and 86.4 ± 5.1 at the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Post-operative V-COR and H-COR of the operated side were 20.8 ± 2.0 mm and 30.2 ± 1.6 mm compared with 51.4 ± 4.1 mm and 33.9 ± 9.0 mm pre-operatively (p < 0.01). The complications included one dislocation and one partial palsy of the sciatic nerve. At the latest follow-up, no radiological component loosening or screw breakage was present. Conclusions: 3D-printed titanium implants showed satisfactory short- and mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. It was an effective therapeutic regimen with a low rate of complications, providing a patient-specific and reliable strategy for the severe acetabular bone defect in revision hip arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA), both with or without pelvic discontinuity, remains a great challenge in orthopaedic surgery.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for failure of custom-made acetabular implants in RTHA.Methods: Seventy patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type III) and pelvic discontinuity, who required RTHA, were included in our study. All prostheses were constructed based on a thin-layer computed-tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis. The treatment was considered unsuccessful in the event of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or aseptic loosening (AL) with need for explantation of the custom-made acetabular implant.Results: The average follow-up was 41.9 ± 34.8 months (range 1.5-120). Implant survival at last follow-up was 75.7% (53 of 70). Explantation was necessary in 17 cases (15 PJI; 2 AL). Previous PJI as reason for RTHA (p= 0.025; OR 3.56 (95% CI: 1.14; 11.21)), additional revision of femoral components (p= 0.003; OR 8.4 (95% CI: 1.75; 40.42)), rheumatoid disease (p= 0.039; OR 3.43 (95% CI: 1.01; 11.40)), elevated preoperative CRP > 15.2 mg/l (p= 0.015; AUC: 0.7) and preoperative haemoglobin < 10.05 (p= 0.022; AUC: 0.69) were statistically significant risk factors associated with treatment failure. Age and BMI were not statistically significant contributing to implant failure.Conclusion: Risk factors for treatment failure were a previous PJI, additional revision of femoral component, rheumatoid disease, elevated preoperative CRP and low preoperative haemoglobin. Awareness of these risk factors will help to improve future treatment standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Burch–Schneider-like antiprotrusio cages (B-SlAC) still remain helpful implants to bridge severe periacetabular bone losses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and estimate both cages' failures and complication risks in a series of B-SlAC implanted in revision of failed total hip arthroplasties (THA) or after resection of periacetabular primary or secondary bone malignancies. Risk factors enhancing the chance of dislocations and infections were checked. Materials and methods: We evaluated 73 patients who received a B-SlAC from January 2008 to January 2018. Group A, 40 oncological cases (22 primary tumors; 18 metastases); Group B, 33 failed THAs. We compared both Kaplan–Meier estimates of risk of failure and complication with the cumulative incidence function, taking account the competing risk of death. Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to identify possible predictors of instability and infection. Harris hip score HHS was used to record clinical outcomes. Results: Medium follow-up was 80 months (24–137). Average final HHS was 61 (28–92), with no differences within the two groups (p > 0.05). The probabilities of failure and complications were 57% and 26%, respectively, lower in the oncologic group than in the rTHA group (p =0.176; risk 0.43) (p = 0.52; risk 0.74). Extended ileo-femoral approach and proximal femur replacement (p =0.02, risk ratio = 3.2; p = 0.04, rr = 2.1) were two significant independent predictors for dislocations, while belonging to group B (p = 0.04, rr = 2.6) was predictable for infections. Conclusion: Burch–Schneider-like antiprotrusio cages are a classical non-biological acetabular reconstruction method that surgeons should bear in mind when facing gross periacetabular bone losses, independently of their cause. However, dislocation and infection rates are high. Whenever possible, we suggest preserving the proximal femur in revision THA, and to use a less-invasive postero-lateral approach to reduce dislocation rates in non-oncologic cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The acetabular distraction technique demonstrates encouraging radiographic and clinical outcomes in treating chronic pelvic discontinuity. The aim of this study is to describe a modified distraction technique and to show our results. Methods This study identified 12 cases of chronic pelvic discontinuity undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the technique of reverse reaming distraction between July 2015 and November 2018. All 12 patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Radiographs were reviewed to inspect for component loosening. Clinical assessment included the Harris hip score (HHS) and an ambulatory scoring system. Results At the time of final follow-up, no patient was revised. One patient had up to 1 cm migration of the cup in a horizontal or vertical direction and more than 20° change in the abduction angle but was asymptomatic. In the remaining 11 patients, no migration of the component was detected. Both the HHS and ambulatory score showed improvement in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. No postoperative dislocation occurred. Conclusions Reverse reaming distraction is a feasible technique in treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity, with encouraging results at early term. However, ongoing follow-up is required to determine the long-term prognosis in patients receiving this technique.

Acetabular defects are a major obstacle to achieving good outcomes after revision hip arthroplasty. One way to deal with this problem is to use acetabular augments. We aimed to describe mid-term outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty using acetabular augments.Materials and methods. We analyzed 85 cases (83 patients) of revision hip arthroplasty using acetabular augments performed during 2012-2018 period: 53 women and 30 men with average age of 57±13 years (25-79). Distribution of acetabular defects was: 51 cases — Paprosky IIIA, 17 cases — Paprosky IIIB, 12 cases — Paprosky IIB, 5 cases — Paprosky IIC. 14 patients had chronic pelvic discontinuity. Aseptic loosening was indication for the operation in 83 cases, periprosthetic hip fracture — 1, dislocation — 1. The amount of previously undregone ipsilateral hipsurgeries was 1 in 35 cases, 2 in 25 cases, 3 and more in 25 cases. Average follow-up period was 38±19 months (1-79).Results. The average HHS score improved from 37±7 preoperatively to 73±9 after 3 months and to 80±11 after 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.001). Average VAS score improved from 7±2 preoperatively to 4±1 after 3 months and to 3±1 after 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.001). Stable acetabular fixation was achieved in each case according to X-ray findings at final follow-up. However, radiolucent lines were present around the cup in 10 cases (11.8 %) followed by no clinical evidence of aseptic loosening. Hip center of rotation was restored from 26.40±18.38 mm (4-75) preoperatively to 4.78±5.02 mm (0-20) postoperatively relatively to 0 point. Complications manifested in 9 out of 85 cases (10,6%). Distribution of complications was: periprosthetic joint infection in 6 cases, recurrent dislocation — 2, periprosthetic hip fracture — 1.7 patients required implant removal and exchange.Conclusions. Good mid-term outcomes can be achieved using acetabular augments during hip revision surgery in setting of acetabular defects. Acetabular augments are a reliable option in case of Paprosky IIIB, IIIA defects and chronic pelvic discontinuity, providing good mechanical stability.

Purpose: Reconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defects is one of the most challenging problems encountered by arthroplasty surgeons. Triflange patient matched implants (PMI) offer the potential advantages of immediate, rigid fixation with a superior individualized fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic midterm results of PMI in extensive acetabular defect reconstruction. Materials and Methods: The current prospectively designed retrospective review examined 13 consecutive patients (5 males and 8 females) with a mean age of 69 years undergoing revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects reconstructed using PMI between October 2011 and December 2016. A successful result was defined as a postoperative increase in Harris hip score (HHS) of >20 points with a radiographically stable implant (assessed with hip X-rays) and no need for additional acetabular reconstruction. Results: Twelve out of the 13 patients in the study were available for follow-up with mean duration of 50 months. One patient died during the study period due to an unrelated cause. The mean HHS increased from 41 to 82 points. Eleven out of 12 acetabular components were well fixed and pelvic discontinuity healed in all patients. Conclusion: Custom triflange PMI is an excellent option for management of complex and extensive acetabular defects with or without pelvic discontinuity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: We report a case of periprosthetic acetabular fracture with pelvic discontinuity (PAFPD) classified Paprosky IIIb around an infected hip resurfacing prosthesis. A 3-stage revision was performed with (1) implants removal and surgical debridement to treat the infection; (2) open reduction and internal fixation using a medial buttress plate to treat pelvic discontinuity; and (3) custom-made total hip replacement with acetabular-ring reinforcement. The patient recovered with excellent clinical and radiographic results at 4-year follow-up. Conclusions: In complex cases of PAFPD, a collaboration between pelvic trauma surgeons and orthopaedic hip surgeons allows to provide stability for revision surgeries with good outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Massive acetabular bone defects reconstructed with allografting and antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty is less reported in the literature. We here report a series of 84 antiprotrusio cages and analyze the risk factors associated with failure.Methods: All instances of use of an antiprotrusio cage for massive acetabular defect (Paprosky type IIc, III, and pelvic discontinuity) between 2002 and 2017 in the authors' institute were reviewed after institutional review board's approval. Survival analyses based on clinical data, bone defect (Paprosky system), type of allograft, size of cage, fixation quality, and position of cage were performed. Failure was defined as cage loosening or breakage, poor hip function, or cage revision for any reason.Results: A total of 84 cages in 77 patients (mean age, 62.9 years), with a mean follow-up period of 6.2 years, had a survival rate of 82.1%. Failure was noted in 15 hips, including mechanical failure in 8 hips, recurrent dislocation in 1 hip, poor hip function in 1 hip, and periprosthetic joint infection in 5 hips. Pelvic discontinuity, reconstruction with morselized allograft alone, and fewer than 4 fixation points to the host bone were associated with higher failure rates (hazard ratios, 4.02, 3.42, and 9.9, respectively).Conclusion: We found that an antiprotrusio cage combined with strut allografts, fixed securely to the host bone (>4 fixation points), are beneficial for the management of massive acetabular bone defects. However, pelvic discontinuity remains a challenge that warrants the further study of technical or prosthetic innovations, such as triflange implants, cup cage, and 3D-printed implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation. There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Severe bone loss is not uncommon especially in periprosthetic joint infection. Surgical options, including revision shells, rings, and cages—with or without bone allograft—are affected by high complication rates and unsatisfactory clinical results. We report our mid-term results of non-flanged, custom-made acetabular components in staged rTHA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing two-stage revision with acetabular custom-made implants between 2014 and 2016 at a single institution. Harris Hip Scores, Oxford Hip Scores, and Visual Analogue Scales for pain were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analysed. Results: We included 19 patients (19 hips) with an average follow-up of 42.3 ± 11.8 months. At the time of re-implantation, significant acetabular bone loss according to Paprosky classification (IIC, IIIA-B, and pelvic discontinuity) was detected in our patients. Clinical outcomes showed statistically significant improvement from pre-operative visit to last follow-up (p < 0.01). All custom-made implants had radiological osseointegration, and we did not find any implant complications, such as loosening or malposition. No mismatch between pre-operative planning and intra-operative findings was observed. To date, we report one septic failure managed with second staged revision, and one re-operation for recurrent THA dislocation. Conclusions: Custom-made acetabular implants showed excellent clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes with a low rate of related complications, providing implant stability on residual host bone, restoring hip biomechanics, and allowing biological osseointegration. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm preliminary results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pelvic discontinuity is a challenging complication in revision total hip arthroplasty. One technique that has garnered enthusiasm with limited data is acetabular distraction. Acetabular distraction provides stability via elastic recoil of the pelvis. The aim of this study is to report implant survivorship, radiographic results, clinical outcomes, and complications in the largest independent series of discontinuities treated with acetabular distraction.Methods: We retrospectively identified all revision total hip arthroplasties with a pelvic discontinuity between 2005 and 2017. Of the 162 patients, 31 were treated with distraction. Mean age was 67 years, with 71% female. Mean body mass index was 28 kg/m2, and mean follow-up was 3 years.Results: The 2-year survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening, re-revision for any reason, and reoperation were 97%, 93%, and 87%, respectively. There were 3 re-revisions including 1 for aseptic loosening, 1 conversion to a dual mobility for instability, and 1 two-stage exchange for infection. At last follow-up, 3 acetabular components did not have evidence of osteointegration. Only patients with osteointegration to both the ilium and ischium had evidence of a healed discontinuity. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 43 preoperatively to 77 postoperatively (P < .0001). The most common complication was a partial sciatic nerve palsy that occurred in 4 patients.Conclusion: In this series utilizing pelvic distraction, there was excellent 2-year survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening. Despite several discontinuities persisting, 90% of patients had radiographic evidence of implant osteointegration, and clinical outcomes improved significantly. The most common complication was a partial sciatic nerve palsy.Level Of Evidence: IV Case Series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment of large acetabular defects and discontinuities remains challenging and relies on the accurate restoration of the native anatomy of the patient. This study introduces and validates a statistical shape model for the reconstruction of acetabular discontinuities with severe bone loss through a two-sided Markov Chain Monte Carlo reconstruction method. The performance of the reconstruction algorithm was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation in three defect types with varying severity as well as severe defects with discontinuities. The two-sided reconstruction method was compared to a one-sided methodology. Although, reconstruction errors increased with defect size and this increase was most pronounced for pelvic discontinuities, the two-sided reconstruction method was able to reconstruct the native anatomy with higher accuracy than the one-sided reconstruction method. These findings can improve the preoperative planning and custom implant design in patients with large pelvic defects, both with and without discontinuities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failed reconstruction in cases of severe acetabular bone loss, with or without pelvic discontinuity, in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) remains a great challenge in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of a "second" rTHA with "custom-made acetabular components (CMACs)" after a previously failed reconstruction with CMACs. Methods: 4 patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type IIIB), who required a second rTHA after a previously failed reconstruction with CMAC, due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), were included in our retrospective study. All prostheses had been constructed on the basis of thin-layer computed-tomography scans of the pelvis. The second rTHA was considered unsuccessful in the event of PJI or aseptic loosening (AL) with need for renewed CMAC explantation. Results: The treatment success rate after second rTHA with a CMAC was 50% (2 of 4). In the successful cases, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris Hip Score (HHS) after the second rTHA (VAS range 2–4; HHS range 45–58 points) did not differ from those after the first rTHA, before onset of symptoms (VAS: range 2–4; HHS: range 47–55 points). In the failed cases, the second CMACs needed to be explanted due to PJI, with renewed detection of previous pathogens. Patients with treatment failure of the second CMAC had required a higher number of revision surgeries after explantation of the first CMAC than patients with a successful outcome. Conclusions: In patients with severe acetabular bone loss and previously failed rTHA with CMACs, repeat rTHA with a CMAC may be a solid treatment option for patients with an "uncomplicated" multi-stage procedure, i.e., without persisting infection after explantation of the original CMAC. While the outcome in terms of clinical function does not appear negatively affected by such a "second attempt," the complication rate and risk of reinfection, nonetheless, is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report our early experience in acetabular reconstruction for significant bone loss and pelvic discontinuity using custom triflange acetabular components. Retrospective consecutive review of all patients treated at our specialist tertiary unit with significant acetabular defects (Paprosky 3A/3B) and pelvic discontinuity who were reconstructed with custom triflange implants. The primary outcomes were radiographic failure and complications. 17 patients (17 hips) were included; 3 males/14 females with a mean age of 72 years (range 61–83). The average follow-up was 3.6 years (2–7 years). Bony defects were Paprosky 3B in 13/17 hips (76%) with pelvic discontinuity encountered in the majority of cases 15/17 hips (88%) and intra-pelvic failed components in 11/17 (64%). At final follow up, no radiographic failures were observed although three patients developed complications (17.6%); haematoma requiring washout out; intra-operative ilium fracture; and recurrent dislocation in one patient. Our experience suggest that acceptable outcomes can be achieved with custom implants for this group of challenging patients, although longer follow up is needed to monitor future implants' failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: 3D CT scan is actually the gold standard for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic discontinuity (PD) in hip revision surgery. Aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3D-modeling with traditional and 3D CT scan. Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified 56 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty revisions with Paprosky Type-3 periacetabular bone defects. Preoperative X-rays, CT scans and 3D-models were blindly reviewed by two orthopedic surgeons to detect possible pelvic discontinuities. Results were compared with surgical notes. Independent sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were calculated for X-rays, CT scan and 3D models. Analysis of interobserver reliability was performed. Results: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. In nine patients, surgical notes indicated a pelvic discontinuity. On 3D CT scans, PD was identified in 25 cases for observer 1 and in 24 cases for observer 2. Analyzing 3D-models, PD was identified in eleven patients by both observers. The nine patients, with PD reported on the surgical report, were all identified with both the techniques. The specificity of standard 3D CT was 0.66 for observer 1 and 0.68 for observer 2 and increased to 0.96 for both observers with the utilization of 3D-models. The positive predictive value increased from 0.36 (observer 1) and 0.38 (observer 2) with the CT evaluation to 0.82 in the 3D-models evaluation. The analysis of 3D models was characterized by a perfect intraobserver reliability (intraobserver correlation coefficient = 1). The observers showed substantial agreement for PD classification; the kappa values were 0.96 and 0.77, respectively, for CT scan and 3D-model evaluation. Conclusions: 3D-modeling showed higher specificity than traditional and 3D CT scans in identification of PD in Paprosky Type-3 periacetabular bone defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The acetabular distraction technique demonstrates encouraging radiographic and clinical outcomes in treating chronic pelvic discontinuity. The aim of this study is to describe a modified distraction technique and to show our results. Methods: This study identified 12 cases of chronic pelvic discontinuity undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the technique of reverse reaming distraction between July 2015 and November 2018. All 12 patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Radiographs were reviewed to inspect for component loosening. Clinical assessment included the Harris hip score (HHS) and an ambulatory scoring system. Results: At the time of final follow-up, no patient was revised. One patient had up to 1 cm migration of the cup in a horizontal or vertical direction and more than 20° change in the abduction angle but was asymptomatic. In the remaining 11 patients, no migration of the component was detected. Both the HHS and ambulatory score showed improvement in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. No postoperative dislocation occurred. Conclusions: Reverse reaming distraction is a feasible technique in treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity, with encouraging results at early term. However, ongoing follow-up is required to determine the long-term prognosis in patients receiving this technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The management of acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components in rTHA.Methods: A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with minimum 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intra- or post-operative complications, aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions rates were extrapolated.Results: 18 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included. Six hundred and thirty-four acetabular custom components (627 patients) with a mean FU of 58.6 ± 29.8 months were analyzed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Custom-made acetabular components allowed a stable fixation with 94.0 ± 5.0% survival rate. The estimated rate of re-operations and re-revisions were 19.3 ± 17.3% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 4.0 ± 3.9%.Conclusions: The acetabular custom-made implants represent a reliable solution for pelvic discontinuity and particular cases of bone loss classified as Paprosky Type IIIA-B or type III-IV according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system where the feature of the defect cannot be handled with standard implants. This strategy allows to fit the implant to the residual host bone, bypassing the bony deficiency and restoring hip biomechanics. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up are reported in literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Severe acetabular bone loss, both with or without pelvic discontinuity, remains a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). The goal of our study was to evaluate the mid-term results for consecutive patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss with or without pelvic discontinuity who needed RTHA with custom-made acetabular implants and to compare the results to those of other studies.Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight (68) patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type IIIa and IIIb), who required RTHA, were included in our study. All prostheses were constructed on the basis of thin-layer computed tomography (CT) scans of the pelvis. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harrison hip score (HHS), and clinical and radiographic follow-up assessments were used to evaluate the outcome.Results: The average follow-up time was 43 months (range 1-120 months). Implant survival at last follow-up was 75% (51 of 68). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with explantation as the endpoint, revealed survival rates of 82.7% (3 years) and 77% (5 years). Patients with revision of the acetabular component only had a significant higher survival rate (p 0.012). Overall revision rate was 36.7%. Reinfection rate was 34.4%. Complications included 15 (22%) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), 7 dislocations (10.2%), and 2 aseptic loosenings (2.9%). Mean VAS at last follow-up was 1.45 compared to 3.2 preoperatively, while mean HHS improved from 21.1 points preoperatively to 61 at last follow-up. The change in both scores was thus significant (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Defect reconstruction with custom-made modular acetabular implants can be a good, nevertheless expensive, treatment option with clinically and radiologically satisfying results in comparison to recent studies in the literature. Nevertheless, high postoperative complication rates, especially in terms of PJI, remain a challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number of total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures performed annually continues to rise. Specific challenges, including acetabular bone loss, are commonly encountered at the time of revision surgery, and orthopaedic surgeons must be prepared to address them. This review focuses on topics related to acetabular reconstruction, including pre-operative patient evaluation (clinical and radiographic), pre-operative planning, common causes of acetabular failure, classification of acetabular bone loss, methods of acetabular reconstruction, and clinical results based on reconstruction method. Pre-operative patient evaluation for revision THA begins with a thorough history and physical examination as well as laboratory workup to rule out infection. Detailed radiographic evaluation and pre-operative planning are also essential and will facilitate communication amongst all members of the operative team. Although there are several ways to describe acetabular bone loss, the Paprosky classification system – defined by anterosuperior and posteroinferior acetabular column integrity – is the system most commonly used today and will guide treatment strategy. Several treatment strategies have been developed and may be termed either "cemented" (e.g. impaction grafting, ring and cage construction, structural allograft) or "uncemented" (e.g. hemispheric shell ± porous metal augment, cup-cage, custom triflange acetabular component). Although each strategy has its advantages and disadvantages, the general principles remain the same. Successful treatment depends upon detailed pre-operative assessment, planning, and team-based plan execution. Uncemented techniques that allow for biologic fixation are preferred. In the special case of pelvic discontinuity, acetabular distraction is the authors' preferred technique. Longer term studies are still needed to evaluate the longevity of each of the various reconstruction methods presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatologia (English Edition) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Acetabular revision especially in the presence of severe bone loss is challenging. There is a paucity of literature critiquing contemporary techniques of revision acetabular reconstruction and their outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and to report clinical outcomes and survival of contemporary acetabular revision arthroplasty techniques (tantalum metal shells, uncemented revision jumbo shells, reinforced cages and rings, oblong shells and custom-made triflange constructs). Full-text papers and those with an abstract in English published from January 2001 to January 2016 were identified through international databases. A total of 50 papers of level IV scientific evidence, comprising 2811 hips in total, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Overall, patients had improved outcomes irrespective of the technique of reconstruction as documented by postoperative hip scores. Our pooled analysis suggests that oblong cups components had a lower failure rate compared with other different materials considered in this review. Custom-made triflange cups had one of highest failure rates. However, this may reflect the complexity of revisions and severity of bone loss. The most common postoperative complication reported in all groups was dislocation. This review confirms successful acetabular reconstructions using diverse techniques depending on the type of bone loss and highlights key features and outcomes of different techniques. In particular, oblong cups and tantalum shells have successful survivorship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, there is a trend of increasing demand for revision hip arthroplasty. Among these patients there are many with complex acetabular defects, including patients with pelvic discontinuity. To ensure stability for revised acetabular components in such cases becomes a challenging or unachievable task. Such defects give indications for printing customized tri-flange acetabular component. The authors analysed own experience of creating and applying custom made acetabular components in 3 patients with complex acetabular defects. Material and methods. Among the patients there were 2 women and 1 man. Average age was 60,3±19,4 years (38 to 78 years). Two patients had III B defects with pelvic discontinuity and one patient had III A defect by Paprosky classification. As the first step, the authors in collaboration with engineers printed a plaster full size pelvic 3D model, as the second step a customized tri-flange acetabular component was designed and printed. Harris Hip Score was evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Results. Average follow-up period was 5,3±2,5 months (3 to 8 months). The authors observed no cases of implant loosening, dislocation or deep periprosthetic infection. Average Harris Hip Score before surgery was 27,13 and after surgery – 74,1 indicating a significant improvement in 3 months postoperatively. Conclusion. Indications for use of individual acetabular components in reported patients correspond to indications formulated by Berasi et al. The authors obtained encouraging early follow-up outcomes that correspond to data of other authors. In one patient certain difficulties were reported due to insufficient pelvic distraction. Component’s flanges prevented achieving adequate pelvic distraction. Nevertheless, good primary stability was achieved. Modern software and 3D metal printers can significantly reduce the production cost of customized acetabular components. Application of this technology can be widened to various orthopaedic centres and will undoubtedly improve the quality of treatment for such patients.

Background: Bilateral pelvic discontinuity is characterized by complete dissociation of the superior and inferior pelvis secondary to bone loss or fracture. The end result is a freely mobile inferior pelvis at the level of each discontinuity which presents a significant reconstruction challenge. This clinical entity has not been described previously, and the results of surgical treatment are not known. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all identified cases of pelvic discontinuity (PD) treated with revision THA at one institution. We identified 133 pelvic discontinuities. Within this group, 6 patients had bilateral simultaneous PDs. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data and radiographic imaging were reviewed preoperatively and postoperatively for the characteristics of the dissociation and assessing PD healing and fixation of components after surgery. Results: There were no preoperative factors that could distinguish these patients from the rest of the group of discontinuities (3 rheumatoid arthritis, 2 osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 1 developmental dysplasia). The reconstructions performed included 2 cup/cage, 5 posterior plating and uncemented cup, 3 cage alone, and 2 cups only. Ten of 12 hips had at least 1 complication postoperatively. At final follow-up, only 1 patient (17%) had radiographic evidence that both discontinuities had healed (posterior plate with uncemented cup). Conclusions: Bilateral pelvic discontinuity is rare but presents the surgeon with a major reconstructive challenge. Only 1 patient went on to radiographic healing with current treatment strategies. Continued motion of the contralateral pelvic dissociation may account for the high failure rates. Surgeons should be aware of the challenges presented by this diagnosis and develop strategies to improve outcomes.

Revision hip arthroplasty rate is growing, and pelvic discontinuity rate ranges from 1% to 5% of acetabular component revision reasons. According to AAOS acetabular defects classification, pelvic discontinuity is fourth type defect in which cranial part of hip bone is separated from caudal part at acetabular level. Usually it occurs from bone loss secondary to osteolysis, infection, fracture or aseptic loosening. There are a lot of techniques for pelvis discontinuity treatment. Published results of bulk allografts and antiprotrusion cages have generally been poor. More preferable methods with acceptable rate of good results are cup-cage systems and custom triflange acetabular components(CTAC). CTACs are designed based on preoperative CT scans to build a custom titanium 3D-printed implant to address the patient's specific bone defect and provide secure fixation in the ilium, pubis, and ischium. We faced pelvic discontinuity, in which extensive iliac bone loss was added to caudal hip bone part medial displacement and pelvic ring deformity, in patient with multiple hip surgeries. Preoperative investigation called into question the possibility of using off-the-shelf hip implants, which could restore the biomechanics of the hip and provide reliable primary fixation at the same time. We present case report of the patient with pelvic discontinuity and massive bone loss treatment using a custom triflange component.

Complex acetabular reconstruction sometimes requires the use of a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC). In this article we describe the surgical technique to achieve its implantation through the direct anterior approach (DAA). Meanwhile we report on our first aMace® CTAC placement in revision total hip arthroplasty through the DAA. Most procedures concerning the implantation of a CTAC are performed through the posterolateral approach to obtain adequate exposure. However, literature reports a high overall dislocation rate of 14% using this approach for revision hip arthroplasty. Because of the documented lower dislocation rate and a faster early rehabilitation of procedures performed through DAA, we considered to implant this vast acetabular reconstruction component through the same approach we use for our primary and standard revision cases. In collaboration with the engineers, the design and the screw direction were adapted to the DAA. We used a standard DAA with longitudinal incision and had no difficulty to successfully implant the CTAC in the desired implant position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Due to growing numbers of primary total hip replacement (THR), the revision THR burden is also increasing. Common indications for revision are osteolysis, infection, instability, and mechanical failure of implants, which can cause acetabular bone loss. Massive acetabular bone defects and pelvic discontinuity are extremely challenging problems. Many techniques have been utilized to address bone loss while maintaining a stable revision THR. Structural allografts, cemented prosthesis, reconstruction cages, and custom triflanged implants have all been used successfully albeit with relatively high complications rates. We have tried to highlight emerging trends to utilize Custom Made Monoflange or Triflange Acetabular Components to reconstruct massive acetabular defects with favourable midterm implant survival, better functional outcomes, relatively lesser complications, and almost similar cost of prosthesis as compared to conventional reconstruction techniques. However, long-term data and study is still recommended to draw a definitive conclusion., Methods: In this narrative review article, we searched PubMed and Cochrane for studies on managing acetabular bone loss in revision THR with a focus on recent literature for mid to long-term outcomes and compared results from various studies on different reconstruction methods., Key Content and Findings: Hemispherical cementless acetabular prosthesis with supplemental screws are commonly utilized to manage mild to moderate acetabular bone loss. Recent trends have shown much interest and paradigm shift in patient specific custom triflange acetabular components (CTAC) for reconstructing massive acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Studies have reported high patient satisfaction, improved patient reported daily functioning, high mid-term implant survival, similar complications, and encouraging all cause re-revision rate. However, more prospective and quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the superiority of CTACs over conventional acetabular implants., Conclusions: There is no consensus regarding the best option for reconstructing massive acetabular defects. Thorough preoperative workup and planning is an absolute requirement for successful revision THR. While most of the moderate acetabular bone loss can be managed with cementless hemispherical acetabular shells with excellent long-term outcomes, reconstructing massive acetabular bone defects in revision THR remains a challenge. Depending on the size and location of the defect, various constucts have demonstrated long-term success as discussed in this review, but complications are not negligible. CTACs provide a treatment for massive bone loss that may be otherwise difficult to achieve anatomic stability with other constructs. Although long-term data is sparse, the cost and complication rate is comparable to other reconstruction methods., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://aoj.amegroups.org/article/view/10.21037/aoj-23-23/coif). The series “Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. A.F.K. reports that he receives IP royalties from Innomed; is a paid consultant for BodyCad, Zimmer, Ortho Development and United Ortho; is a board or committee member of AAOS and AAHKS; and has stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble and Zimmer. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.)

Background: Careful preoperative planning in revision cases with complex acetabular defects is crucial for optimal surgery outcome. However, in many cases, computed tomography (CT) scans cannot give a clear understanding of the pelvic destruction. Three-dimensional (3D) models-based on CT data can help surgeon in planning of complex acetabular reconstruction. Materials and Methods: We used 3D plaster pelvic models in 17 revision cases. There were 5 patients with Paprosky II C acetabular defects, 2 patients with Paprosky IDA defects, and 10 patients with Paprosky IIIB defects (3 patients among them with pelvic discontinuity). We used 3D printer and digital 3D models based on CT scan data for 3D models printing. In 3 cases with Paprosky IIIB defects, we implanted custom-made acetabular components with the porous coating, also printed on the 3D printer. Results: In 14 cases, we used trabecular metal (TM) augments with TM cups. In 100% of cases, number and type of planned and used augments were same. In 9 (64.3%) cases, size of planned and used cups was same. In other cases, the difference was not >2 mm. Conclusions: Use of 3D plaster models for the revision hip arthroplasty planning with complex acetabular defects has shown high accuracy in the clear understanding of acetabular bone deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The treatment of extensive bone loss and massive acetabular defects can be compounded by several challenges and pitfalls. The survivorship following acetabular revision with extensive bone loss is still unsatisfactory. The goal of the present study was to analyse the outcomes of 3D-printed patient-specific acetabular components in the management of extensive acetabular defects and combined pelvic discontinuity (PD). Methods: 9 patients underwent revision THA using 3D-printed custom acetabular components to reconstruct extensive acetabular defects. The Paprosky classifications were determined in all patients. The primary outcome measure was the implant-associated failure rate. Results: 1 out of 9 patients suffered an implant-associated complication (11%). The overall implant-associated survival rate was 89%. The overall complication rate was 56%. Conclusions: The patient-specific acetabular component technique shows promise for the treatment of patients with severe acetabular defects in revision THA. Further research aimed at reducing costs and improving the complication rate are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several techniques have been described for management of severe acetabular bone defects during revision hip surgery including reconstructive cages. The purpose of this study is to analyze the survival and the mid-term clinical and radiological outcome using the Graft Augmentation Prosthesis (GAP II cage) (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) in addition to impaction grafting for acetabular defects in revision hip surgery.Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent acetabular revision hip replacement using GAP II cage and impaction bone grafting between 2009 and 2013 at our institution. Twenty-six patients were included with a mean age of 71 years (49-91). According to Paprosky classification, 2 patients had type IIB defect, 4 had type IIC, and 12 had type IIIA, while 8 suffered from type IIIB defect. The clinical outcome was assessed using Oxford Hip Score. Plain radiographs were used to assess preoperative bone loss, postoperative implant migration, and the incorporation of the bone graft to host bone.Results: The average Oxford Hip Score improved from 11.3 (2-22) preoperatively to 32.2 (20-48) postoperatively. The revision free survivorship of this construct was 100% at mean follow-up of 49 months (30-78). Three hips had radiological failure of the implant with no clinical consequences.Conclusion: The use of GAP II cage with impaction bone grafting to reconstruct severe acetabular defects had encouraging mid-term results with low failure rate. Graft incorporation with restoration of bone stock may be beneficial should further revision surgery be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Primary THA in an irradiated hip poses risk for early loosening and inadequate ingrowth.Adverse effects such as decreased vascularity and increased infection risk pose a threat. Case presentation Our patient was a case of post-irradiation (for cervical cancer) bilateral THA loosening causing aseptic acetabular loosening on one side and catastrophic septic loosening with a Paprosky type IIIB acetabular defect with pelvic discontinuity on the contralateral side. Discussion There have been various studies documenting deleterious effects of irradiation on osseointegration and provide a challenge for long-term implant stability in THA patients. Conclusion A meticulous treatment protocol with contemporary implant technology and staged bilateral stepwise management can lead to satisfactory clinical outcomes.This case report highlights on such specific nuances and principles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]