Search

Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity among people with tuberculosis (TB). Despite the availability of guidelines on how to integrate dual TB/DM in Tanzania, the practice of integration at various healthcare levels is unclear. Objective To explore the participants’ experiences and perceptions on the pathway towards clinical management of dual TB/DM. Method The research was carried out in Dar es Salaam, Iringa, and Kilimanjaro regions between January and February 2020. A qualitative, in-depth interview approach was used to collect participants’ experiences and perspectives on the acquisition of dual TB/DM services at various levels of healthcare facilities. The information gathered were coded and classified thematically. Results The participants’ perception of TB services within the healthcare facilities was positive due to the support they received from the healthcare providers. On the other hand, participants reported difficulty receiving management in various health facilities for each condition in terms of access to dual TB/DM care and access to DM medication. This was viewed as a significant challenge for the participants with dual TB/DM. Conclusions The current disjunction and disruption in healthcare for people with dual TB/DM makes it difficult to access services at various levels of health facilities. For optimal clinical management for people with dual TB/DM, patient-centered strategies and integrated approaches are urgently needed.

Objective: To assess the current Tanzania health facilities readiness in integrating clinical management of dual Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) by using the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) manual of the World Health Organization prior to implementing an integrated service model. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A needs assessment survey was conducted at varying levels of health care facilities. The SARA manual evaluated the service delivery outcomes in terms of availability of guidelines, medicines and diagnostic equipment, training of healthcare workers in providing TB and DM care, and patient record review. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 26. Results: Among 29 health facilities selected, three were regional referral hospitals, eight were district hospitals and eighteen were health centers. Baseline investigations revealed that GeneXpert MTB/RIF machines were present in 10 (34.5%) facilities, and glycated hemoglobin devices were present in two (6.9%) facilities, while all health facilities had a glucometer. The presence of an attending medical doctor in 19 (65.5%) facilities and the presence of operating biochemistry analyzers in 15 (51.7%) facilities were two mandatory variables used to assess readiness. Among the various guidelines observed, none of the facilities had the 2016 DM guidelines. Overall, 15 (51.7%) health facilities were ready to integrate dual TB and DM services. Conclusion: Integrative TB/DM screening and management activities can be achieved only if integration initiatives are prioritized at all levels of health facilities and among health policy makers in Tanzania. At least half of the health facilities were prepared to integrate the management of dual TB/DM. However, there is an urgent need to mobilize significant resources to improve the integration in these facilities, such as management guidelines and diagnostics..