1. Situational factors shape moral judgments in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern, and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
- Author
-
Quiamzade A, Erin Michelle Buchanan, Danielle P. Ochoa, Alasdair Gordon-Finlayson, Graton A, Brown Bt, Marton Kovacs, Ghossainy Me, Perez Cc, Rink Hoekstra, Sievers E, Darius-Aurel Frank, Liu X, Lynds Tm, Elke B. Lange, Niklas K. Steffens, David Moreau, Christopher R. Chartier, Balazs Aczel, Luisa Batalha, Rybus K, John Protzko, Anthony Lantian, Twardawski M, Rizqy Amelia Zein, Taciano L. Milfont, Michal Parzuchowski, Don C. Zhang, Iones Mt, Susa Kj, Kendrick Km, Lu Jg, Janssen Smj, Benjamin Becker, Dustin P. Calvillo, Dumačić F, Biljana Gjoneska, Mirisola A, Neil Marvin McLatchie, Tiede Ke, Karimi-Malekabadi F, Moeini-Jazani M, Maximilian Primbs, Szostak N, Jared Celniker, Barnaby J. W. Dixson, Rockwell F. Clancy, Charlotte A. Hudson, Eudave Ramos L, Martin Voracek, Natalia Dutra, Zezelj I, Burak Egd, Bayrak F, Marijke C. Leliveld, Andrew G. Thomas, Kathleen Schmidt, Stefan Czoschke, Huskey R, Carlota Batres, Zoltan Kekecs, Christine Reyna, Philip Pärnamets, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Scigala Ka, Krystian Barzykowski, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Maja Becker, Anabel Belaus, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Robert M. Ross, Sara Álvarez Solas, Wood S, Michał J. Białek, Mackinnon Sp, Jordane Boudesseul, Matibag C, Gabriela Marcu, Puvia E, Nicholas C. Owsley, Danka Purić, Anna Wlodarczyk, Mattiassi A, Jiaxin Shi, Christoph Schild, Ian D. Stephen, Daniel Storage, Lalot F, Lenz Jn, Albalooshi S, Stefan Stieger, Yoon S, Bastian Jaeger, Zheng X, Kühberger A, Goh Jx, Yilmaz O, Lima Tjs, Susann Fiedler, Joris Lammers, Miguel A. Vadillo, Jan Philipp Röer, Carnes N, Adamus S, Shane-Simpson C, Hidding J, Gollwitzer M, Carmel A. Levitan, Tunstead Lv, Paterlini J, Tamás Nagy, Thomas Rhys Evans, Miroslav Sirota, Sinan Alper, William J. Chopik, fei x, Erica D. Musser, Ernest Baskin, Wagge, Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Samuel Lincoln Bezerra Lins, Kocalar He, Stevens-Wilson Lj, Evgeniya Hristova, Zahir Vally, Maurice Grinberg, Wilton Ls, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Jokic B, Magraw-Mickelson Z, Pavol Kačmár, Michael C. Mensink, Li Y, Kim Peters, Anni Sternisko, Elizabeth Harris, Gilad Feldman, Christopher M. Castille, Alexandra Fleischmann, Tripat Gill, Diego A. Reinero, West S, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Bence Bago, Matus Adamkovic, Jerome Olsen, Alexios Arvanitis, Bilancini E, Andrej Findor, Gwenaël Kaminski, Tonkovic M, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Manyu Li, Szekely-Copîndean Rd, and Andree Hartanto
- Subjects
Moral reasoning ,Psychology ,Moral dilemma ,Epistemology - Abstract
Much research on moral judgment is centered on moral dilemmas in which deontological perspectives (i.e., emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with utilitarian judgements (i.e., following the greater good defined through consequences). A central finding of this field Greene et al. showed that psychological and situational factors (e.g., the intent of the agent, or physical contact between the agent and the victim) play an important role in people’s use of deontological versus utilitarian considerations when making moral decisions. As their study was conducted with US samples, our knowledge is limited concerning the universality of this effect, in general, and the impact of culture on the situational and psychological factors of moral judgments, in particular. Here, we empirically test the universality of deontological and utilitarian judgments by replicating Greene et al.’s experiments on a large (N = X,XXX) and diverse (WEIRD and non-WEIRD) sample across the world to explore the influence of culture on moral judgment. The relevance of this exploration to a broad range of policy-making problems is discussed.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF