Search

Aims: European clinical guidelines recommend that patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including ischaemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), are prescribed lipid lowering treatment (LLT) and treated to target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. This study aimed to document trends in ASCVD, including treatment, monitoring, and achievement of target LDL-C., Methods and Results: A retrospective observational population study was performed using linked healthcare data (2010-22). Over the study period, the number of patients with ASCVD increased from 181 153 to 207 747 (8882 to 9398 per 100 000). The proportion of patients prescribed LLT decreased from 75.3% in 2010 to 67.1% in 2022; high-intensity statin therapy increased from 9.4 to 25.2%, while non-high-intensity statin therapy decreased from 59.6 to 38.2%. The prescription of high-intensity statin therapy was consistently higher amongst patients with IHD (10.9% in 2010 increasing to 28.0% in 2022) than in patients with stroke (4.7-21.6%) or PAD (3.9-10.6%).The proportion of cases with documented LDL-C decreased from 58.0% in 2010 to 49.3% in 2022. Of those with documented LDL-C in 2022, 44.0% achieved LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L, including 45.2% of those with IHD, 42.0% of those with stroke, and only 32.8% of those with PAD., Conclusion: Prescription of LLT, including high-intensity statin therapy, documentation of LDL-C, and achievement of target LDL-C levels was relatively low, especially in PAD patients. Although target achievement in 'tested patients' increased over time, the proportion of patients undergoing lipid testing declined. More rigorous lipid management requires prioritisation, especially for PAD and stroke patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: Patients with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) should have an optimal management in terms of lipid goal [i.e. controlled LDL-cholesterol (LDLc)] and medical treatment (triple therapy with an antiplatelet agent, a statin and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a angiotensin-receptor antagonist). Prevalence of LEAD patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l is unknown. Aims of this study were to: (i) describe the prevalence of patients with a LDLc < 0.55 g/l, (ii) describe the prevalence of patients with an optimal medical treatment; (iii) compare this management between patients with a vascular surgery history and those without a vascular surgery history; and (iv) evaluate the number of patients eligible for new lipid-lowering therapies according to FOURIER and REDUCE-IT criteria., Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, prevalence is expressed as numbers and percentages. Comparison of the number of well managed patients between LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history and those without was performed. Number of patients who would be eligible for FOURIER and REDUCE-IT studies were calculated., Results: Among the LEAD patients included in the analysis (n = 225), only 12.4% (n = 28) had a LDLc < 0.55 g/L. The prevalence of patients who received the optimal medical treatment was 50.7% (n = 114). There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of patients with and without vascular surgery history achieving the LDLc goal (n = 9 (10.6%) vs. n = 19 (13.6%); p = not significant). Ninety-three patients (46.0%) would be eligible for EVOLOCUMAB treatment according to the Fourier study design whereas 17 patients (8.4%) would be eligible for treatment with ICOSAPENT ETHYL according to the REDUCE-IT study design., Conclusion: A majority of LEAD patients did not reach the LDLc goals. LEAD patients with a vascular surgery history did not experience a better management whereas they had a more consistent follow-up., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Despite its high worldwide prevalence and the intuitable negative prognostic connotation, for a long time peripheral artery disease (PAD) has not been the subject of particular interest by the cardiac scientific community. The availability of a new therapeutic strategy (low-dose rivaroxaban associated with acetylsalicylic acid) has reignited interest in PAD. The clear evidence derived from the COMPASS and VOYAGER PAD trials, with the possibility of using dual pathway inhibition, has given new energy to the therapeutic front against symptomatic PAD also associated with coronary artery disease. This review article aims to revisit the pathophysiological concepts underlying PAD and the path of the various clinical trials that have led to new scientific evidence.

Background: Clopidogrel is widely used for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). CYP2C19 plays a pivotal role in the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. Clopidogrel-treated carriers of a CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele (LOF) may have a higher risk of new atherothrombotic events. Previous studies on genotype-guided treatment were mainly performed in CAD and showed mixed results., Purpose: To simultaneously investigate the impact of CYP2C19 genotype status on the rate of atherothrombotic events in the most common types of atherosclerotic disease (CAD, stroke, PAD)., Methods: A comprehensive search in Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from their inception to July 23rd 2023 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing genotype-guided and standard antithrombotic treatment, and cohort studies and post hoc analyses of RCTs concerning the association between CYP2C19 genotype status and clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated patients were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the safety end point major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke., Results: Forty-four studies were identified: 11 studies on CAD, 29 studies on stroke, and 4 studies on PAD. In CAD, genotype-guided therapy significantly reduced the risk of MACE [risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.83], myocardial infarction (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.68), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.94), compared with standard antithrombotic treatment. The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.23). Most RCTs were performed in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (9/11). In stroke, LOF carriers had a significantly higher risk of MACE (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25-2.08) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.48-2.40) compared with non-carriers. No significant differences were found in major bleeding (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43-1.89). In the 6955 patients with symptomatic PAD treated with clopidogrel in the EUCLID trial, no differences in MACE or major bleeding were found between LOF carriers and non-carriers. In three smaller studies on patients with PAD treated with clopidogrel after endovascular therapy, CYP2C19 genotype status was significantly associated with atherothrombotic events., Conclusions: Genotype-guided treatment significantly decreased the rate of atherothrombotic events in patients with CAD, especially after PCI. In patients with history of stroke, LOF carriers treated with clopidogrel had a higher risk of MACE and recurrent stroke. The available evidence in PAD with regard to major adverse limb events is too limited to draw meaningful conclusions., Registration: PROSPERO identifier no. CRD42020220284., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are recommended to receive antiplatelet therapy, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients with concomitant LEAD and AF, data comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (an antiplatelet agent used in conjunction with a DOAC) vs. DOAC monotherapy are scarce. This retrospective cohort study, based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these antithrombotic strategies., Methods: Patients with AF who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between 2012 - 2020 and received any DOAC within 30 days of discharge were included. Patients were grouped by antiplatelet agent exposure into the dual antithrombotic therapy and DOAC monotherapy groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Major adverse limb events (MALEs), ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until the occurrence of any study outcome, death, or up to two years., Results: A total of 1 470 patients were identified, with 736 in the dual antithrombotic therapy group and 734 in the DOAC monotherapy group. Among them, 1 346 patients received endovascular therapy as the index revascularisation procedure and 124 underwent bypass surgery. At two years, dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of MALEs than DOAC monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 1.56), primarily driven by increased repeat revascularisation. Dual antithrombotic therapy was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.94) and gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.33) than DOAC monotherapy., Conclusion: In patients with concomitant LEAD and AF who underwent peripheral revascularisation, DOAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MALEs and bleeding events than dual antithrombotic therapy., (Copyright © 2024 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is one of the main treatments for acute limb ischaemia. Urokinase is still a widely used thrombolytic drug in some regions. However, there needs to be a clear consensus on the protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis using urokinase for acute lower limb ischaemia., Methods: A single-centre protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis with low-dose urokinase (20,000 IU/hour) lasting 48-72 h for acute lower limb ischaemia was proposed based on our previous experiences. A retrospective study from June 2016 to December 2020 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol. The target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were also monitored during follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for the subgroup analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for reinterventions and death., Results: 90 lower limbs were involved, including 51 Rutherford Grade I, 35 Grade IIa and four Grade IIb. During a 60.8-h thrombolysis, 86 cases (95.5%) were considered effective according to the angiogram. No major bleeding complication occurred during thrombolysis, and one amputation occurred after. Freedom from target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were 75.6%, 94.4% and 91.1% during a mean 27.5-month follow-up, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier estimator, aortoiliac lesions had lower reintervention rates than femoropopliteal lesions (Log-rank p = 0.010), and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had a lower reintervention rate (Log-rank p = 0.049). Age was an independent risk factor for death ( p = 0.038, hazard ratio 1.076, 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.153)., Conclusions: The single-centre protocol of catheter-directed thrombolysis we proposed for acute lower limb ischaemia was effective and safe. Strict blood pressure control during catheter-directed thrombolysis ensured safety. Aortoiliac lesions and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had lower reintervention rates during follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE-including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death-and MALE-defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) experience major cardiovascular and limb events. Antithrombotic strategies including antiplatelets and anticoagulants remain a cornerstone of treatment and prevention. Recent trials have shown heterogeneity in the response to antithrombotic therapies in patients presenting primarily with PAD when compared to those presenting primarily with coronary artery disease. In addition, there is observed heterogeneity with regards to the effects of antiplatelets and anticoagulants with respect to different outcomes including cardiovascular and major adverse limb events. This, coupled with risks of bleeding, requires a patient-centered and holistic assessment of benefit-risk when selecting antithrombotic strategies for patients with PAD. A global multidisciplinary work group was convened to evaluate antithrombotic strategies in PAD and to summarize the current state of the art. Common clinical scenarios around antithrombotic decision making were provided. Finally, insights with regard to implementation future investigation were described., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Bonaca and Hess work with CPC, a nonprofit academic research organization affiliated with the University of Colorado that has received research grant/consulting funding from Abbott Laboratories, Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc, Alexion Pharma, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Amgen Inc, Angionetics Inc, Anthos Therapeutics, ARCA Biopharma Inc, Array BioPharma Inc, AstraZeneca and Affiliates, Atentiv LLC, Audentes Therapeutics Inc, Bayer and Affiliates, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Better Therapeutics Inc, Boston Clinical Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Cambrian Biopharma Inc, Cardiol Therapeutics Inc, CellResearch Corp, Cleerly Inc, Cook Regentec LLC, CSL Behring LLC, Eidos Therapeutics, Inc, EP Trading Co Ltd, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd, Epizon Pharma Inc, Esperion Therapeutics Inc, Everly Well Inc, Exicon Consulting Pvt Ltd, Faraday Pharmaceuticals Inc, Foresee Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd, Fortress Biotech Inc, HDL Therapeutics Inc, HeartFlow Inc, Hummingbird Bioscience, Insmed Inc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA Inc, Janssen and Affiliates, Kowa Research Institute Inc, Kyushu University, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Medimmune Ltd, Medpace, Merck & Affiliates, Nectero Medical Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, Novo Nordisk Inc, Osiris Therapeutics Inc, Pfizer Inc, PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals Inc, PPD Development, LP, Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, Prothena Biosciences Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regio Biosciences Inc, Saint Luke’s Hospital of Kansas City, Sanifit Therapeutics SA, Sanofi Groupe, Silence Therapeutics PLC, Smith & Nephew plc, Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc, State of Colorado CCPD Grant, The Brigham & Women's Hospital Inc, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Thrombosis Research Institute, University of Colorado, University of Pittsburgh, VarmX, Virta Health Corporation, Worldwide Clinical Trials Inc, WraSer LLC, and Yale Cardiovascular Research Group. Dr Bonaca has received support from the AHA SFRN under award numbers 18SFRN3390085 (BWH-DH SFRN Center) and 18SFRN33960262 (BWH-DH Clinical Project). Dr Barnes has received grants from Boston Scientific; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Anthos, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific; has been part of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for Translational Sciences (Clinical Events Adjudication Committee); and has been a member of the Board of Directors - Anticoagulation Forum. Dr Bauersachs has received personal fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, LEO-Pharma, Pfizer, VIATRIS; and has received research support from the Bavarian State Ministry of Health and FADOI (Federazione delle Associazioni dei Dirigenti Ospedalieri Internisti). Dr Conte has received grants from BioGenCell and Profusa; and has been a member of the DSMB for Abbott Vascular. Dr Mena-Hurtado has received consulting fees from Abbott, Cook, and Penumbra; and has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, Philip, Shockwave, and Abbott. Dr Weitz has received consulting fees from Alnylam, Anthos, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ionis, JnJ, Merck, and Regeneron. Dr Beckman has received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; and has received consulting fees from JanOne, Janssen, Novartis, MingSight, and Merck. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The management of embolic acute limb ischaemia commonly involves determining aetiology and performing emergency invasive procedures. This detailed study aimed to determine the impact of manipulation of anticoagulation in the aetiology of emboli in acute limb ischaemia and determine the efficacy of primary anticoagulation therapy vs. invasive interventions. Material and methods: Data collection was conducted at a single institution on a cohort of patients presenting consecutively with embolic acute limb ischaemia over one year. Two groups were compared, one receiving anticoagulation as primary therapy with those undergoing invasive treatment as the internal comparison group. Results: A likely haematological causation was identified in 22 of 38 presentations, related to interruption of anticoagulation in cardiac conditions, the majority atrial fibrillation (n=12), or hypercoagulable states (n=10). Limb salvage was pursued in 36 patients employing anticoagulation (n=19) or surgical embolectomy (n=17) as the primary therapy in upper and lower limbs (n=17 vs n=19 respectively). Despite delays often well beyond six hours and a range of ischaemic severity in both groups, 35 of 36 patients achieved full or substantive restoration of function with improved perfusion. Regarding anatomical distribution of arterial disease and therapy, three patients with multi-level disease proceeded to embolectomy following anticoagulation. Embolectomy was undertaken most often for proximal emboli and more profound paralysis. Conclusions: Anticoagulation and coagulopathy are commonly implicated in the aetiology of arterial emboli, with omission of effective anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation being associated in almost 1/3 of presentations. Whilst more profound limb paralysis and proximal or multi-level disease tended to be managed surgically, primary anticoagulation therapy alone or with a secondary embolectomy was effective across the spectrum of ischaemia severity and despite significant delays beyond guideline recommendations.

Background: The Vascular Outcomes Study of aspirin (ASA) Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) trial demonstrated the superiority of ASA and low-dose rivaroxaban (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial dosing) compared with ASA alone in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and major adverse limb events. We studied the COMPASS discharge prescription patterns in patients with symptomatic PAD who have undergone revascularization in our institution, since the time of publication of the Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD trial., Methods: All patients included in this study had documented lower-extremity atherosclerotic PAD and were eligible for COMPASS dosing. Revascularization strategies included endovascular (n = 299), suprainguinal bypass (n = 18), and infrainguinal bypass (n = 36)., Results: COMPASS prescription patterns for the composite of endovascular and surgical strategies demonstrated a consistently low rate over time, without a trend toward increasing use. COMPASS dosing was prescribed as often as antiplatelet monotherapy (33.4% COMPASS vs. 34.6% antiplatelet monotherapy). This low COMPASS prescription rate was driven by significantly lower COMPASS prescriptions following endovascular therapy compared to surgical bypass (28.8% endovascular vs. 59.3% surgical bypass). COMPASS prescriptions following surgical bypass showed better trends; half of suprainguinal bypass patients (50.0%) and two-thirds of infrainguinal bypass patients (63.9%) were discharged on COMPASS. Despite patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) representing a high-risk limb presentation, COMPASS prescriptions were low (29.8%), as opposed to patients without CLTI, and did not show a trend toward increasing use. In patients who underwent reinterventions throughout the observation period, there was a low conversion rate from ASA alone to COMPASS (3/26, 11.5%)., Conclusions: In this observational study, one-third of patients were undertreated by prescription of antiplatelet monotherapy, indicating that there is significant room for medical optimization. This is especially true of patients undergoing endovascular treatment, including the high-risk subgroup of patients with CLTI. We highlight the importance of dual pathway antithrombotic therapy in patients eligible for COMPASS dosing to optimize best current evidence medical therapy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the manifestation of atherosclerosis characterized by the accumulation of plaques in the arteries of the lower limbs. Interestingly, growing evidence suggests that the pathology of PAD is multifaceted and encompasses both vascular and skeletal muscle dysfunctions, which contributes to blunted physical capabilities and diminished quality of life. Importantly, it has been suggested that many of these pathological impairments may stem from blunted reduction-oxidation (redox) handling. Of note, in those with PAD, excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) outweighs antioxidant capabilities resulting in oxidative damage, which may have systemic consequences. It has been suggested that antioxidant supplementation may be able to assist in handling ROS. However, the activation of various ROS production sites makes it difficult to determine the efficacy of these antioxidant supplements. Therefore, this review focuses on the common cellular mechanisms that facilitate ROS production and discusses how excessive ROS may impair vascular and skeletal muscle function in PAD. Furthermore, we provide insight for current and potential antioxidant therapies, specifically highlighting activation of the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) - Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway as a potential pharmacological therapy to combat ROS accumulation and aid in vascular function, and physical performance in patients with PAD. Altogether, this review provides a better understanding of excessive ROS in the pathophysiology of PAD and enhances our perception of potential therapeutic targets that may improve vascular function, skeletal muscle function, walking capacity, and quality of life in patients with PAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the effects of colchicine, which has been shown to reduce the risks of coronary artery disease but scarcely studied in peripheral artery disease (PAD), on major adverse limb events (MALE) in patients with PAD., Methods: This is a retrospective study based on a nationwide database. Patients who were diagnosed with PAD between 2010 and 2020 and prescribed with colchicine after the diagnosis of PAD were identified. Patients were then categorized into the colchicine or the control group according to drug use. Propensity score matching was performed to mitigate selection bias. Risks of MALE (including lower limb revascularization and nontraumatic amputation) and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups., Results: After patient selection and propensity score matching, there were 60,219 patients in both colchicine and control groups. After a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the risk of MALE was significantly lower in the colchicine group compared with control (subdistribution HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.80), as were the incidence of both components of MALE, lower limb revascularization and major amputations. Colchicine treatment was also associated with lower risk of cardiovascular death. The lower risk of MALE observed with colchicine therapy was accentuated in the subgroup of patients receiving concomitant urate-lowering medications., Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with PAD, the use of colchicine is associated with lower risks of MALE and cardiovascular death. Anti-inflammatory therapy with colchicine may provide benefits in vascular beds beyond the coronary arteries., (Copyright © 2024 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events for high-risk patients with peripheral artery disease. It is unknown whether rivaroxaban plus aspirin improves intermittent claudication for adults with lower-risk peripheral arterial disease., Methods: In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, 24-week clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication to receive either 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban twice daily plus 100 mg of aspirin once daily or 100 mg of aspirin once daily. The primary outcome was a 24-week change in total walking distance, measured by the 6-minute walking test. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding., Results: Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n=46) or aspirin alone (n=42). The mean age was 67 years, and 54% were female. The total walking distance measured by 6-minute walk test improved by 89 ± 18 m (mean±standard error) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group versus 21 ± 16 m in the aspirin-alone group. This corresponded to an absolute difference of 68 ± 24 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 19 to 116 m; P=0.007) and a relative improvement over the aspirin-alone group of 327% (95% CI, 94 to 560%). No major bleeding events were observed in either group., Conclusions: In patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication, 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban twice daily plus 100 mg of aspirin daily improved the total walking distance by a 6-minute walking test compared with 100 mg of aspirin daily alone. (Funded by Bayer S.A.; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04853719.).

Purpose of Review: The prevalence of peripheral artery disease is growing, with millions of people globally suffering its end-stage manifestation, chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Revascularization procedures like lower extremity bypass play a vital role in limb salvage but optimal medical therapy is essential for maximizing the benefit of these procedures and reducing long-term risks of cardiovascular and limb-related events., Recent Findings: Patients with PAD who undergo lower extremity bypass warrant a comprehensive approach to risk factor modification for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and limb-related complications. This includes appropriate use of high-intensity statins, smoking cessation, and management of hypertension and diabetes. Additionally, antiplatelet therapy is indicated for all patients with CLTI and additional treatment with low-dose anticoagulation may also be beneficial., Summary: Optimal medical therapy is essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity bypass., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a complex, heterogeneous condition that has become a leading health concern globally. Peripheral arterial disease often co-exists with other vascular disease states, including cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. Optimal therapy for managing symptoms and progression of disease employs non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and contemporary revascularisation techniques to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life. However, large well-designed randomised control trials (RCT) and corresponding evidence-based guidelines for management of PAD are lacking, with current practice standards often extrapolated from evidence in coronary artery disease. Purpose: This review article aims to discuss currently accepted best pharmacological practice for PAD. Method: Relevant articles were searched between May 2023 and January 2024 through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and international guidelines, focusing on pharmacological management for PAD. Results: This narrative review discusses holistic pharmacological treatments for PAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Abstract: The dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease reduces the occurrence of cardiovascular events, with no significant increase of intracranial or other critical organ bleedings. Our observational study aimed to describe the clinical performance, adherence, and persistence of DPI therapy among a real-world setting of patients with an established diagnosis of coronary artery (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). We prospectively included all consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of CAD and/or PAD treated with aspirin (ASA) 100 mg once daily and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, before starting treatment, at 1 month, and every 6 months after the study drug administration. A total of 202 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years; male 80%) eligible to DPI therapy were included. During a mean follow-up of 664 ± 177 days, the incidence rate of major bleedings and of major adverse cardiovascular events was 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 patients/year, respectively. The adherence to pharmacological treatment was 99%. Additionally, 13.4% of patients suspended the DPI therapy during the follow-up. Minor bleedings resulted the most common cause of both temporary and permanent DPI therapy discontinuation. This observational study supports the safety of DPI with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin among patients with CAD and PAD in a real-world setting, showing high persistence and maximum adherence to medical treatment., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Premature peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined by lower extremity revascularization (LER) at age ≤ 50 years, is associated with poor major adverse limb events. The early onset of disease is thought to be influenced by genetic factors that regulate homeostasis of the vascular wall and coagulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulation as an adjunct to antiplatelet therapy on the outcomes of LER in patients with premature PAD., Methods: There were 8,804 patients with premature PAD on preoperative and postoperative antiplatelet therapy only and 1,236 patients on preoperative and postoperative anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention, infrainguinal, and suprainguinal files. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed between patients with premature PAD who were on antiplatelet therapy and those on anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative and 1-year outcomes were analyzed including reintervention, major amputation, and mortality., Results: Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to have coronary artery disease (48.7% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (20.2% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001), and have undergone prior LER (73.9% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. They were also less likely to be independently ambulatory (74.2% vs. 81.8%, P < 0.001) and be on a statin medication (66.8% vs. 74.3%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. Patients on anticoagulation were also less likely to be treated for claudication (38.1% vs. 48.6%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be treated with an endovascular procedure (64.8% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.001). After matching for baseline characteristics, there were 1,256 patients on antiplatelet therapy only and 628 patients on anticoagulation. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to require a return to the operating room (3.7% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001) and had higher perioperative mortality (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.032), but major amputation was not significantly different (1.8% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.798) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy alone. At 1 year, amputation-free survival was higher in patients on antiplatelets only compared to patients on anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications (87.5% vs. 80.9%, log-rank P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Anticoagulation in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with premature PAD undergoing LER is associated with increased reintervention and mortality at 1 year., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: No study has investigated the perioperative management and clinical outcomes in patients who are receiving rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81 to 100 mg daily., Objective: To assess perioperative management and outcomes in patients who are receiving low-dose rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice-daily, and low-dose ASA, 81 to 100 mg daily. To assess perioperative management and outcomes in patients who are receiving low-dose rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice-daily, and low-dose ASA, 81 to 100 mg daily., Methods: Subanalysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial was performed to assess perioperative management and clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary or peripheral artery disease who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day plus ASA 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day, or ASA 100 mg daily. Patients studied required a surgery/procedure during the trial. The study outcomes, which included myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, acute limb ischemia, bleeding, and death, were assessed according to treatment allocation., Results: There were 2632 patients studied (mean age, 68 years; 80% male) who had a surgery/procedure, comprising percutaneous coronary interventions (∼43%), carotid or other arterial angioplasty (∼15%), pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation (∼9%), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (∼7%). Perioperative study drug management varied, with about one-third of patients not interrupting study drug and the remainder interrupting it between 1 and ≥10 days preprocedure. The incidences of adverse outcomes across treatment groups were 12.7% to 15.3% for myocardial ischemia, 0.8% to 1.2% for stroke, 0.1% to 0.2% for venous thromboembolism, and 3.1% to 4.2% for any bleeding. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome rates across treatment groups., Conclusion: In patients in the COMPASS trial who required a surgery/procedure, there was no significant difference in perioperative adverse outcomes whether patients were receiving rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day and ASA 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day, or ASA alone., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There was no funding provided for the development and for any other aspect of the work in this manuscript. J.D.D. reports consulting and lecture honoraria from Servier Canada, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, and Fresinius Kabi. Q.L. reports no disclosures. D.L.B. reports advisory for Angiowave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys and research funding from Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CinCor, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, Youngene, and 89Bio. E.M. reports being employed as a global clinical lead by Bayer AG, Germany. M.K.W. reports no disclosures. S.C. reports grants from Bayer AG and personal fees from BMS, Pfizer, Portola, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo, and Medtronic. S.Y. reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Cadila. A.P.M. reports receiving personal fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. J.W.E. reports grants and/or personal fees from Anthos, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Idorsia, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKlein, and Sanofi Aventis., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Current endovascular treatments of below the knee (BTK) popliteal or tibial/peroneal arteries including investigational drug-coated balloons have limited long-term efficacy., Objectives: This Phase 2 trial assessed the feasibility of adventitial deposition of temsirolimus to reduce neointimal hyperplasia and clinically relevant target lesion failure (CR-TLF) 6 months after BTK arterial revascularization., Methods: This prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, comparative, dose-escalation trial enrolled 61 patients with Rutherford 3 to 5 symptoms undergoing endovascular revascularization of ≥1 angiographically significant BTK lesions. Perivascular infusion after completion of arterial revascularization was randomized into control (saline) vs low-dose (0.1 mg/mL) temsirolimus groups for the first 30 patients. In the second part of the trial, patients were randomized to control versus high-dose (0.4 mg/mL) temsirolimus groups. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were target lesion (TL) transverse-view vessel area loss percentage (TVAL%) and CR-TLF at 6 months, respectively. CR-TLF was defined as a composite of ischemia-driven major amputation of the target limb, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and clinically relevant TL occlusion. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse limb events or perioperative death (MALE+POD) at 30 days., Results: There was no discernable difference in effect between temsirolimus doses; therefore, the low- and high-dose cohorts were pooled for the analyses. The principal analysis on the per protocol (PP) group of 53 patients revealed superior primary efficacy of the treatment arm, with reduction in TVAL% of 13.9% absolute (37.3% relative) and the rate of CR-TLF reduced by 27.1% absolute (51.3% relative), at 6 months. Subgroup analysis of all Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) B to D lesions (N=36) revealed TVAL% reduction of 22.3% absolute (48.3% relative) and the rate of CR-TLF reduced by 39.2% absolute (56.6% relative). Freedom from 30-day MALE+POD was 100% in all groups., Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating trial suggests that adventitial infusion of temsirolimus in BTK arteries improves TVAL% and CR-TLF with no adverse safety signals through 6 months, supporting the move to a Phase 3 trial., Clinical Impact: There remain gaps in the endovascular treatment of patients with atherosclerotic lesions of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. The TANGO trial evaluated the use of sub-adventitial temsirolimus with the Bullfrog micro-infusion device during BTK interventions. The therapy was safe and effective. Compared with controls, vessel lumen area patency was improved, and target lesion failure was less frequent. The effects were most appreciable in subjects with higher baseline TASC lesions (B, C, or D). Sub-adventitial temsirolimus offers the potential to improve the results of BTK interventions in this challenging patient population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.C.G., I.C., and M.R. have no conflicts of interest. E.J.A. is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Medtronic, Philips and Shockwave. J.G. is the Chief Medical Officer of Avinger. M.H.S. is on the advisory board/consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Terumo, BSC, and Phillips. V.L. is a former employee of Syntactx, and currently serves as the Senior Director of Clinical Affairs at CytoSorbents Inc. K.O. is a former employee of Syntactx and had equity in Syntactx, he is currently the chief medical officer of NAMSA.

Background: Systolic blood pressure (BP) is a key predictor of cardiovascular events, but patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are rarely included in hypertension trials. The VALUE trial (Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation) investigated the long-term effects of valsartan- or amlodipine-based treatments on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension with a high cardiovascular risk. The aim of this subanalysis was to clarify the relationship between achieved BP on treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension with PAD., Methods: Patients were followed for 4 to 6 years, and BP was measured regularly. The primary end point was time to the first major adverse cardiovascular event, including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, and heart failure requiring hospitalization. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression, adjusting for various baseline covariates., Results: Of the 13 803 participants, 1898 (13.8%) had PAD. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, patients with PAD had a 23% increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients without PAD. Patients with an achieved systolic BP <130 mm Hg and 130 to 139 mm Hg, compared with those with systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg, were associated with a decreased risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43-0.97]; P =0.037; 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74-0.97]; P =0.016, respectively). Additionally, systolic BP <130 mm Hg was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12-0.92]; P =0.034). The incidence of the primary outcome did not differ between antihypertensive treatment regimens ( P =0.365)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that more intensive BP control is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertensive PAD., Competing Interests: Disclosures G. Mancia reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Menarini Group, Merck, Novartis, Recordati, Sandoz, Sanofi, and Servier outside the present work. S.E. Kjeldsen reports lecture honoraria from Emcure, Getz, JB Pharma, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Sanofi-Aventis, and Vector-Intas. M.A. Weber reports honoraria from Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Idorsia, Roche, Medtronic, ReCor, Ablative Solutions, Verve, and Omron. M. Vrsalovic reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Viatris, and Berlin Chemie Menarini. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: In patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), low-dose Factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) taken with aspirin improved limb and cardiovascular outcomes compared to aspirin alone. Furthermore, in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, FXaI are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for chronic anticoagulation. While studies have evaluated different perioperative anticoagulation regimens in patients treated for PAD, the optimal regimen for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has not been determined. This analysis compares outcomes of patients after PVI that require chronic anticoagulation with FXaI and VKA., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative-PVI database was used. Patients consistently treated with FXaI or VKA before the procedure, at discharge, and on long-term follow-up were defined as those receiving chronic anticoagulation. Patient demographics, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between FXaI and VKA groups., Results: A total of 109,268 patients were analyzed, and 6,885 were chronically anticoagulated with FXaI (N = 2,427) or VKA (N = 4,458). Patients anticoagulated with VKA were more frequently males (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P < 0.001) with end-stage renal disease (9.7% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001) and more likely to be treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (58.1% vs. 52.7%, P < 0.001). Rates of hematoma following PVI were significantly higher in patients taking VKA compared to FXaI (3.5% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that VKA were associated with increased perioperative hematoma than FXaI (odds ratio = 1.89 [1.30-2.82]). Compared to patients taking VKA, those receiving FXaI had lower rates of major amputation (6.7% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.020) and mortality (7.6% vs. 15.2%, P ≤ 0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients consistently anticoagulated with FXaI had improved amputation-free survival after PVI. Adjusting for significant patient and procedural characteristics, Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that there is an increased risk for major amputation or mortality in patients using VKA compared to FXaI (hazard ratio 1.61, [1.36-1.90])., Conclusions: Chronic anticoagulation with FXaI as compared to VKA was associated with superior perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing PVI. FXaI should be the preferred agents over VKA for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing PVI., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The risk of coronary artery disease in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is high, life prognosis is poor, and lipid-lowering treatment with statins has been reported to improve prognosis. In clinical practice, however, hypolipidemia is more common in patients with severe PAD and statin prescription rates appear to be low, but specific data are scarce in Japan. Therefore, we conducted this cross-sectional study in collaboration with other centers of vascular surgery to determine the rate of statin prescriptions for PAD patients in real-world practice, the rate of achievement of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control targets, and whether statin non-use is a determinant factor of critical limb ischemia (CLI)., Methods: A total of 246 PAD patients (97 with CLI) from 5 sites were included in this study. Medical history and blood test data were obtained from medical records and interviews with patients, and were compared between CLI and non-CLI patients., Results: Statin prescription rate was only 34 %. The overall LDL cholesterol control target rate was 46 % of CLI cases and 51 % of non-CLI cases, according to the lipid management criteria of the Japanese Society for Atherosclerosis 2022 guidelines. Patients in the CLI group had a lower mean body mass index and lower LDL cholesterol levels than those in the non-CLI group, suggesting that these factors were responsible for the lower statin prescription rate. However, multivariate analysis revealed that statin non-use was one of the determinants of CLI., Conclusions: Statin prescription rates for PAD patients were low in real-world practice settings in the field of vascular surgery. Since statin non-use is a determinant of CLI, there is a need to educate physicians engaged in treatment regarding lipid-lowering treatment with statins., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Masatsune Ogura has received lecture fees from Kowa and Amgen. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) often results from atherosclerosis, and is highly prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Individuals with T2DM exhibit a more severe manifestation and a more distal distribution of PAD compared to those without diabetes, adding complexity to the therapeutic management of PAD in this particular patient population. Indeed, the management of PAD in patients with T2DM requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach that addresses both the systemic effects of diabetes and the specific vascular complications of PAD. Hence, cardiovascular prevention is of the utmost importance in patients with T2DM and PAD, and encompasses smoking cessation, a healthy diet, structured exercise, careful foot monitoring, and adherence to routine preventive treatments such as statins, antiplatelet agents, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. It is also recommended to incorporate glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the medical management of patients with T2DM and PAD, due to their demonstrated cardiovascular benefits. However, the specific impact of these novel glucose-lowering agents for individuals with PAD remains obscured within the background of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). In this review article, we distil evidence, through a comprehensive literature search of CVOTs and clinical guidelines, to offer key directions for the optimal medical management of individuals with T2DM and lower extremity PAD in the era of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

People with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) have increased oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial activity, and poor walking performance. NAD+ reduces oxidative stress and is an essential cofactor for mitochondrial respiration. Oral nicotinamide riboside (NR) increases bioavailability of NAD+ in humans. Among 90 people with PAD, this randomized double-blind clinical trial assessed whether 6-months of NR, with and without resveratrol, improves 6-min walk distance, compared to placebo, at 6-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared to placebo, NR significantly improved 6-min walk (+7.0 vs. -10.6 meters, between group difference: +17.6 (90% CI: + 1.8,+∞). Among participants who took at least 75% of study pills, compared to placebo, NR improved 6-min walk by 31.0 meters and NR + resveratrol improved 6-min walk by 26.9 meters. In this work, NR meaningfully improved 6-min walk, and resveratrol did not add benefit to NR alone in PAD. A larger clinical trial to confirm these findings is needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To examine the impact of trimetazidine on skeletal muscle function in patients suffering from peripheral artery disease., Methods: The systematic review was conducted from July 20 to November 22, 2022, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and comprised search for interventional studies on MEDLINE, ProQuest, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases using key words "peripheral artery disease" and "trimetazidine" or their synonyms. The cut-off date for the search was July 21, 2022. Clinical parameters, including Ankle-Brachial Index, Maximum Walking Distance, Maximum Walking Time and Pain Onset Time, were analysed both narratively and quantitatively whenever possible., Results: Of the 587 studies initially identified, 12(2%) were shortlisted. Of them, 2(16.7%) qualified for detailed analysis, comprising 172 patients with intermittent claudication. There was no significant difference between the examined groups' Ankle-Brachial Index values at baseline and post-intervention (p=0.83). Maximum Walking Distance improvement was significantly higher (p=0.0006) in trimetazidine group compared to control group. Maximum Walking Time MWT and Pain Onset Time were significantly different between control and trimetazidine groups (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Trimetazidine's anti-ischaemic effect in peripheral artery disease patients improved Maximum Walking Distance, while it had no significant influence on Ankle-Brachial Index. Well-designed studies addressing the issue are needed.

Purpose of Review: Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). This manuscript will review the current evidence for medical therapy in patients with PAD according to different clinical features and the overall cardiovascular (CV) risk., Recent Findings: The management of PAD encompasses non-pharmacologic strategies, including lifestyle modification such as smoking cessation, supervised exercise, Mediterranean diet and weight loss as well as pharmacologic interventions, particularly for high risk patients. Benefits for reduction of CV and limb outcomes have been demonstrated for new therapies, including antithrombotic therapy (i.e., low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin), lipid lowering therapy (i.e., proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors), and glucose lowering therapy (i.e., sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). However, the adoption of these therapies in PAD remains suboptimal in practice. Implementation science studies have recently shown promising results in PAD patients. Comprehensive medical and non-medical management of PAD patients is crucial to improving patient outcomes, mitigating symptoms, and reducing the risk of MACE and MALE. A personalized approach, considering the patient's overall risk profile and preference, is essential for optimizing medical management of PAD., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study aimed to investigate the effect of clopidogrel on oxidative stress in PAD patients. Seventy subjects were divided into three groups: PAD patients before treatment (B-PAD), PAD patients after treatment with clopidogrel (A-PAD), and healthy controls. Serum levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and oxidized protein were measured. SOD activities were also determined. The results showed that SOD activities, and SOD specific activities were significantly decreased in PAD patients compared to healthy individuals. After treatment with clopidogrel, SOD activities, and SOD specific activities were continuously decrease in PAD patients. The SOD and oxidized protein concentrations were significantly increased in PAD patients compared to healthy individuals. After treatment with clopidogrel, the oxidized protein concentration was significantly decreased, while SOD concentration was significantly increased in PAD patients. These findings suggest that the treatment by clopidogrel stimulated the production of the enzyme but the ratio of active enzyme remained low. The decrease in oxidized protein can be explained by the treatment having antioxidant efficacy that may have compensated for the deficiency in enzyme activity and led to a decrease in oxidized protein. Additionally, the results of this study provide promising evidence that oxidative stress biomarkers including SOD concentration, T-SOD activity, Mn-SOD activity, and oxidized protein levels have potential utility in the diagnosis and management of PAD., (© 2024. Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.)

Background: Arterial calcification due to deficiency of CD73 (ACDC; OMIM 211800) is a rare genetic disease resulting in calcium deposits in arteries and small joints causing claudication, resting pain, severe joint pain, and deformities. Currently, there are no standard treatments for ACDC. Our previous work identified etidronate as a potential targeted ACDC treatment, using in vitro and in vivo disease models with patient-derived cells. In this study, we test the safety and effectiveness of etidronate in attenuating the progression of lower-extremity arterial calcification and vascular blood flow based on the computed tomography (CT) calcium score and ankle-brachial index (ABI)., Methods: Seven adult patients with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of ACDC were enrolled in an open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm pilot study for etidronate treatment. They took etidronate daily for 14 days every 3 months and were examined at the NIH Clinical Center bi-annually for 3 years. They received a baseline evaluation as well as yearly follow up after treatment. Study visits included imaging studies, exercise tolerance tests with ABIs, clinical blood and urine testing, and full dental exams., Results: Etidronate treatment appeared to have slowed the progression of further vascular calcification in lower extremities as measured by CT but did not have an effect in reversing vascular and/or periarticular joint calcifications in our small ACDC cohort., Conclusions: Etidronate was found to be safe and well tolerated by our patients and, despite the small sample size, appeared to show an effect in slowing the progression of calcification in our ACDC patient cohort. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01585402) ., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Cilostazol is used for the treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact of cilostazol on the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) remains controversial. This study assesses the use and impact of cilostazol on patients undergoing PVI for peripheral arterial disease (PAD)., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database files for PVI were reviewed. Patients with PAD who underwent PVI for chronic limb threatening-ischemia or claudication were included and divided based on the use of cilostazol preoperatively. After propensity matching for patient demographics and comorbidities, the short-term and long-term outcomes of the 2 groups (preoperative cilostazol use versus no preoperative cilostazol use) were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine outcomes., Results: A total of 245,309 patients underwent PVI procedures and 6.6% (N = 16,366) were on cilostazol prior to intervention. Patients that received cilostazol were more likely to be male (62% vs 60%; P < 0.001), White (77% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), and smokers (83% vs. 77%; P < 0.001). They were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (50% vs. 56%; P < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (14% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patient on cilostazol were more likely to be treated for claudication (63% vs. 40%, P < 0.001), undergo prior lower extremity revascularization (55% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have undergone prior minor and major amputation (10% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive cilostazol. After 3:1 propensity matching, there were 50,265 patients included in the analysis with no differences in baseline characteristics. Patients on cilostazol were less likely to develop renal complications and more likely to be discharged home. Patients on cilostazol had significantly lower rates of long-term mortality (11.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001 and major amputation (4.0% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in rates of reintervention, major adverse limb events, or patency after PVI. Amputation-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients on cilostazol, after 4 years of follow up (89% vs. 87%, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Cilostazol is underutilized in the VQI database and seems to be associated with improved amputation-free survival. Cilostazol therapy should be considered in all patients with PAD who can tolerate it prior to PVI., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Adherence to antiplatelet therapy is recommended but unexplored in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Therefore, this study aimed to determine adherence and persistence to antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD, defined as intermittent claudication and chronic limb threatening ischaemia., Design: Population based nationwide cohort study., Methods: This study included all Danish citizens aged ≥ 40 years with a first inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of symptomatic PAD between 2010 - 2017, and who had at least one prescription claim for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days after diagnosis. Adherence was determined by the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the first year after diagnosis. Persistence was defined as no treatment gap ≥ 30 days between prescription renewals over three year follow up., Results: A total of 39 687 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 23 279 (58.7%) claimed a prescription for aspirin and/or clopidogrel within 90 days of diagnosis. Among these, 12 898 (55.4%) were prevalent users, while the remainder comprised new users who initiated the therapy after the index PAD diagnosis. The mean PDC was 74.5% (SD 35.0%) for prevalent users and 60.5% (SD 30.5%) for new users. Adherence increased with age and number of concomitant drugs. The overall one year cumulative incidence treatment discontinuation was 13.0% (95% CI 12.5 - 13.4%) overall, 17.2% (CI 16.6 - 17.9%) for prevalent users, and 7.9% (CI 7.4 - 8.4%) for new users. At three year follow up, the cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 31.5% (CI 30.9 - 32.2%) overall, 44.6% (CI 43.7 - 45.4%) for prevalent users, and 14.6% (CI 13.9 - 15.3) for new users., Conclusion: Less than 60% of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic PAD claimed a prescription for antiplatelet therapy within 90 days of diagnosis, and both adherence and persistence were moderate during the first year after diagnosis. These findings underscore the importance of efforts to improve the initiation and continuation of antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events have been shown to occur at higher frequency in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In this study, our aim is to evaluate whether statin is being used appropriately in patients with PAD and also evaluate its usage with the number of vascular beds involved., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed data of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAD based on invasive or noninvasive imaging. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data collected were described using descriptive statistics. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors for the prescription of statins (HIS). High-intensity statin therapy was defined as atorvastatin ≥40 mg per day, rosuvastatin ≥20 mg per day, or simvastatin ≥80 mg per day, according to American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines., Results: We analyzed data from 166 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63.34 years. The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (DM) (68.86%). Statins were used in 82% of patients, among whom only 39% were on high-intensity statins. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.06-0.61, p = 0.005], on oral anticoagulants (OAC) (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.62, p = 0.008) and on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.08-0.47, p < 0.000) had lower odds of receiving lower extremity revascularization (LIS) therapy., Conclusion: Despite having a high risk of future adverse cardiac events, patients with PAD are less likely to receive appropriate statin therapy. Involvement of more vascular beds was associated with higher chances of initiating high-intensity statin., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2024.)

Abstract: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the third leading cause of atherosclerotic morbidity after coronary heart disease and stroke yet is widely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Treatment of risk factors such as diabetes and cigarette smoking can benefit patients with PAD. Patients should have adequate blood pressure and lipid control to decrease clinical manifestations and symptoms of PAD. Use of antithrombotic medications should be individualized to the patient depending on the presence of symptoms, revascularization, and comorbidities. All patient care providers, including physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, should incorporate PAD screening in their at-risk patients to improve access for appropriate earlier diagnosis, initiation of guideline directed therapy, and risk factor modification to reduce both major adverse CV and limb outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of PAD and summarize clinical trial evidence and guideline recommendations for screening and treatment to increase awareness among health care providers to ultimately have a positive impact on patient care., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) when used as an adjuvant therapy with indirect revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) after the failure of direct revascularization (DR)., Methods: At our centers, 120 patients suffering from infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease with CLI underwent a failed trial of DR procedure, all revascularization procedures were endovascular. Median follow-up was 2 years and 2.5 years for patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). In the alprostadil group, the mean age was 63.41 ± 12.52; 36 (60%) for males and 24 (40%) for females. Post-endovascular intervention alprostadil was administrated immediately postoperatively by intravenous infusion of 40 μg alprostadil diluted in 100 ml of normal saline, over 2 hr every 12 hr for 6 days., Results: In the alprostadil group, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) was 0.45 ± 0.175, while the mean ± SD of ABI at the end of our study was 0.65 ± 0.216 with a difference from the baseline of 0.2 ± 0.041 (P value = 0.08, <0.05 meaning that it is significant). Our 1-month primary patency rate was 93.3%, while our 3- and 6-month patency rate was 92.9%. In the control group, the mean ± SD of the baseline ABI was 0.68 ± 0.22, while the mean ± SD of ABI at the end of our study was 0.69 ± 0.23 with a difference from the baseline of 0.01 ± 0.01 (P value >0.05 meaning that it is nonsignificant) 1-month patency rate was 89%, while 3- and 6-month patency rate was 75%. When we compared the patient's leg vessels before and after our intervention, we found that the percentage of the no-runoff-vessels group decreased from 10 (16.7%) to 4 (6.67%). One-runoff-vessel group percentage dropped from 40 (66.7%) to 36 (60%), whereas, in the two-runoff-vessel group, the percentage increased from 10 (16.7%) to 20 (33.3%). We evaluate leg arteries; we do no pedal arch intervention in the alpostradil group. Out of the total of 60 patients, limb salvage occurred in 58 (96.7%) patients, and 2 (3.3%) patients underwent below-the-knee amputation before the study ended., Conclusions: Our results show the efficacy and safety of alprostadil as an adjuvant therapy with indirect angiosomal revascularization in patients with tissue loss due to CLI., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This population based retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between combined treatment with lipid lowering drugs and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy and long term survival following vascular surgery in Norway., Methods: The study included all patients who were registered for the treatment of carotid stenosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and atherosclerotic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) in the Norwegian Registry for Vascular Surgery between 2015 and 2019 and who were discharged alive. Clinical and medication details were retrieved from the register. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox regression model. Stratification was according to treatment group, patient sex, and if patients received the recommended medications or not. Recommended medications were defined as lipid lowering drugs, usually statins, and antiplatelets, or sometimes anticoagulants, when comorbidity indicated anticoagulation therapy., Results: In total, 15 810 patients had LEAD, 4 080 patients AAA, and 2 194 patients had carotid stenosis. In all treatment groups, survival was superior for patients who used the recommended medications upon discharge. The difference was greatest in patients with LEAD with mean survival periods of 4.33 (95% CI 4.29 - 4.36) and 3.7 (95% CI 3.64 - 3.77) years in patients discharged with and without the recommended medications, respectively (p < .001). The mean survival periods were 4.67 (95% CI 4.61 - 4.73) and 4.34 (95% CI 4.24 - 4.44) years in patients with AAA discharged with and without the recommended medications, respectively (p < .001). Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significantly lower mortality rate for patients discharged with the recommended medications for LEAD (HR 0.58; p < .001) and AAA (HR 0.57; p < .001)., Conclusion: The recommended medications were associated with improved survival in all treatment groups and both sexes. The survival difference was statistically significant in patients with LEAD and AAA. Patients with LEAD had the greatest improvement; therefore, the recommended secondary prophylaxis is especially important in these patients., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The risk of major bleeding complications in catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains high, with reported major bleeding complication rates in up to 1 in every 10 treated patients. Fibrinogen was the only predictive marker used for bleeding complications in CDT, despite the lack of high quality evidence to support this. Therefore, recent international guidelines recommend against the use of fibrinogen during CDT. However, no alternative biomarkers exist to effectively predict CDT-related bleeding complications. The aim of the POCHET biobank is to prospectively assess the rate and etiology of bleeding complications during CDT and to provide a biobank of blood samples to investigate potential novel biomarkers to predict bleeding complications during CDT., Methods: The POCHET biobank is a multicentre prospective biobank. After informed consent, all consecutive patients with lower extremity ALI eligible for CDT are included. All patients are treated according to a predefined standard operating procedure which is aligned in all participating centres. Baseline and follow-up data are collected. Prior to CDT and subsequently every six hours, venous blood samples are obtained and stored in the biobank for future analyses. The primary outcome is the occurrence of non-access related major bleeding complications, which is assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Secondary outcomes are non-major bleeding complications and other CDT related complications. Proposed biomarkers to be investigated include fibrinogen, to end the debate on its usefulness, anti-plasmin and D-Dimer., Discussion and Conclusion: The POCHET biobank provides contemporary data and outcomes of patients during CDT for ALI, coupled with their blood samples taken prior and during CDT. Thereby, the POCHET biobank is a real world monitor on biomarkers during CDT, supporting a broad spectrum of future research for the identification of patients at high risk for bleeding complications during CDT and to identify new biomarkers to enhance safety in CDT treatment., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Mol et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) in their current implementation cannot incorporate prior or external information on benefits and risks. We demonstrate how to incorporate prior data using a Bayesian mixture model approach while conducting quantitative benefit-risk assessments (qBRA) for medical products., Methods: We implemented MCDA and SMAA in a Bayesian framework. To incorporate information from a prior study, we use mixture priors on each benefit and risk attribute that mixes information from a previous study with a vague prior distribution. The degree of borrowing is varied using a mixing proportion parameter., Results: A demonstration case study for qBRA using the supplementary New Drug Application (sNDA) filing for Rivaroxaban for the indication of reduction in the risk of major thrombotic vascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) was used to illustrate the method. Net utility scores, obtained from the randomized controlled trial data to support the sNDA, from the MCDA for Rivaraxoban and comparator were 0.48 and 0.56, respectively, with Rivaroxaban being the preferred alternative only 33% of the time. We show that with only 30% borrowing from a previous RCT, the MCDA and SMAA results are favorable for Rivaroxaban, accounting for the seemingly aberrant results on all-cause death in the trial data used to support the sNDA., Conclusion: Our method to formally incorporate prior data in MCDA and SMAA is easy to use and interpret. Software in the form of an RShiny App is available here: https://sai-dharmarajan.shinyapps.io/BayesianMCDA&#95;SMAA/ ., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Drug Information Association, Inc.)

Background: The beneficial role of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) in coronary artery disease is well established. However, there is limited data describing the effects of DAPT in patients with atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare clinical outcomes associated with DAPT versus single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with symptomatic PAD., Methods: We performed a literature search for studies assessing the risk of adverse cardiovascular and limb events in cohorts receiving either DAPT or SAPT. The primary endpoint was all cause mortality. The secondary endpoints included graft failure, amputation, total bleeding, severe bleeding and fatal bleeding. The search included the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search was not restricted to time or publication status., Results: A total of 11 studies with 54,331 participants (24,449 on SAPT and 29,882 on DAPT) were included. Patients with PAD treated with SAPT had higher all-cause mortality compared to patients treated with DAPT (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.09-1.74; p < 0.01). There was no difference in risk of graft failure or amputation between patients treated with SAPT or DAPT (OR 0.9, 95 % CI 0.77-1.06; p = 0.19; OR 1.11, 95 % CI 0.88-1.41; p = 0.37). Patients treated with SAPT had lower total bleeds compared to patients treated with DAPT (OR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.36-0.77; p < 0.01). However, For SAPT plus AC vs SAPT, a total of 8 studies with 17,100 participants (3447 with SAPT plus AC and 8619 with only SAPT) were included. Patients on SAPT plus AC did not have a statistically significant difference in risk for all-cause mortality, (OR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.67-1.24; p = 0.56). SAPT plus AC had significantly lower risk of MI (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.69-0.97; p = 0.02), amputation (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.53-0.97; p = 0.03), and graft failure (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.48-0.93; p = 0.02). There was no significant different in risk of fatal bleeding be-tween the two groups (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 0.76-3.35; p = 0.22)., Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic PAD, a strategy of DAPT may confer a mortality benefit when compared to SAPT without significantly increasing the risk of serious bleeding events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ticagrelor reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and increased bleeding in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease. Limb events including revascularization, acute limb ischemia (ALI), and amputation are major morbidities in patients with T2DM and atherosclerosis., Objectives: This study sought to determine the effect of ticagrelor on limb events., Methods: Patients were randomized to ticagrelor or placebo on top of aspirin and followed for a median of 3 years. MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), limb events (ALI, amputation, revascularization), and bleeding were adjudicated by an independent and blinded clinical events committee. The presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) was reported at baseline., Results: Of 19,220 patients randomized, 1,687 (8.8%) had PAD at baseline. In patients receiving placebo, PAD was associated with higher MACE (10.7% vs 7.3%; HR: 1.48; P < 0.001) and limb (9.5% vs 0.8%; HR: 10.67; P < 0.001) risk. Ticagrelor reduced limb events (1.6% vs 1.3%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.96; P = 0.022) with significant reductions for revascularization (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; P = 0.044) and ALI (HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08-0.70; P = 0.009). The benefit was consistent with or without PAD (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.58-1.11; and HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.55-1.05, respectively; P interaction  = 0.81). There was no effect modification of ticagrelor vs placebo based on PAD for MACE (P interaction  = 0.40) or TIMI major bleeding (P interaction  = 0.3239)., Conclusions: Patients with T2DM and atherosclerosis are at high risk of limb events. Ticagrelor decreased this risk, but increased bleeding. Future trials evaluating the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin would further elucidate the benefit/risk of such therapy in patients with PAD, including those without coronary artery disease. (A Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [THEMIS]: NCT01991795)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures THEMIS was funded and sponsored by AstraZeneca Research & Development. Dr Bonaca is the Executive Director of CPC, a nonprofit academic research organization affiliated with the University of Colorado, that receives research grant/consulting funding from Abbott, Agios, Alexion Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Angionetics, Anthos, ARCA Biopharma, Array, AstraZeneca, Atentiv, Audentes, Bayer, Better Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiol Therapeutics, CellResearch, Cleerly, Cook Medical, Cook, CSL Behring, Eidos Therapeutics, EP Trading Co, Esperion Therapeutics, EverlyWell, Faraday, Faraday, Fortress Biotech, HDL Therapeutics, Heartflow, Hummingbird Bioscience, Insmed, Janssen, Kowa Research, Lexicon, Merck, Medtronic, Moderna, Novate Medical, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PPD Development, Prairie Education and Research, Prothena Ciosciences, Regeneron, Regio Biosciences, Sanifit Therapeutics, Sanofi, Smith and Nephew, Stealth BioTherapeutics, University of Colorado, Worldwide Clinical Trials, Wraser, and Yale Cardiovascular Research Group; has stock in Medtronic and Pfizer; and has received consulting fees from Audentes. Dr Bhatt serves as the co-chair of THEMIS and THEMIS-PCI with research funding from AstraZeneca paid to Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He discloses the following relationships: Advisory Board: AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; Board of Directors: AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data Monitoring Committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi-Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; and Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor-in-Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), and Wiley (steering committee); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; neither I nor Brigham and Women's Hospital receive any income from this patent); Research Funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, and 89Bio; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, Svelte, and Vascular Solutions; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; and Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Takeda. Dr Leiter has received research funding from, has provided CME on behalf of, and/or has received research funding from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion, HLS, Kowa, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier. Dr Himmelmann is an employee of AstraZeneca. Drs Ridderstråle, Andersson, and Chen are employees of AstraZeneca. Dr Kosiborod has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served as a consultant or on the advisory board for 35Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, scPharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and Youngene Therapeutics; has received other research support from AstraZeneca; has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and has stock options in Artera Health and Saghmos Therapeutics. Dr McGuire has received honoraria for trial leadership from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, Lilly USA, and CSL Behring; and has received consulting fees from Lilly USA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck & Co, Novo Nordisk, Applied Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Bayer, Altimmune, Intercept, and Pfizer. Dr Steg has received grants and nonfinancial support (cochair of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial [Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab]; as such, he has received no personal fees, but his institution has received funding for the time he has devoted to trial coordination, and he has received support for travel related to trial meetings) from Sanofi; has received research grants and personal fees from Bayer (Steering Committee MARINER [A Study of Rivaroxaban (JNJ-39039039) on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk of Post-Hospital Discharge Patients], grant for epidemiological study), Merck (speaker fees, grant for epidemiological studies), Sanofi (cochair of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial; cochair of the SCORED trial (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk); has received consulting and speaker fees from Servier (Chair of the CLARIFY registry [Prospective Observational Longitudinal Registry of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease]; grant for epidemiological research), and Amarin (executive steering committee for the REDUCE-IT trial [Disease Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial]; consulting); has received personal fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, and AstraZeneca; and has a European application number/patent number, issued on October 26, 2016 (No. 15712241.7), for a method for reducing cardiovascular risk. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives : The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of lumbar sympathetic block (LSB) on pain scores, Fontaine Classification, and collateral perfusion status in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), in whom revascularization is impossible. Material and Methods : Medical records of 21 patients with PAD who underwent LSB with a combination of local anesthetics, steroids, and patient follow-up forms containing six-month follow-ups between January 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Detect Questionnaire (PDQ) scores, Fontaine Classification Stages, and collateral perfusion status (collateral diameter and/or development of neovascularization) evaluated by arterial color Doppler Ultrasound (US) from the medical records and follow-up forms of the patients were reviewed. Results : NRS and PDQ scores were significantly lower, and regression of the Fontaine Classification Stages was significantly better after the procedure at the first, third, and sixth month than at the baseline values ( p < 0.001). Only four patients (19%) had collaterals before the procedure. An increase in the collateral diameter after LSB was noted in three out of four patients. Before the procedure, 17 patients had no prominent collateral. However, in thirteen of these patients, after LSB, neovascularization was detected during the six-month follow-up period (three patients in the first month, seven patients in the third month, and thirteen patients in the sixth month). The number of patients evolving neovascularization after LSB was found to be statistically significant at the third and sixth months compared to the initial examination ( p < 0.001). Conclusions : LSB with the use of local anesthetic and steroids in patients with lower extremity PAD not only led to lower NRS and PDQ scores, but also resulted in regressed Fontaine Classification Stages and better collateral perfusion status.

Background: The VOYAGER PAD (Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Major Thrombotic Vascular Events in Subjects With Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Peripheral Revascularization Procedures of the Lower Extremities) trial compared rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) plus aspirin with aspirin alone in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease requiring endovascular or surgical limb revascularization, with 50% receiving clopidogrel background therapy. The New Drug Indication application includes benefit-risk assessments using clinical judgment to balance benefits against risks. During its review, the US Food and Drug Administration requested additional quantitative benefit-risk analyses with formal weighting approaches., Methods and Results: Benefits and risks were assessed using rate differences between treatment groups (unweighted analysis). To account for clinical importance of the end points, a multi-criteria decision analysis was conducted using health state utility values as weights. Monte Carlo simulations incorporated statistical uncertainties of the event rates and utility weights. Intent-to-treat and on-treatment analyses were conducted. For unweighted intent-to-treat analyses, rivaroxaban plus aspirin would result in 120 (95% CI, -208 to -32) fewer events of the primary composite end point (per 10 000 patient-years) compared with aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban caused an excess of 40 (95% CI, 8-72) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding events, which was largely driven by nonfatal, nonintracranial hemorrhage Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding events. For weighted analyses, rivaroxaban resulted in the utility equivalent of 13.7 (95% CI, -85.3 to 52.6) and 68.1 (95% CI, 7.9-135.7) fewer deaths per 10 000 patient-years (intent-to-treat and on-treatment, respectively), corresponding to probabilities of 64.4% and 98.7%, respectively, that benefits outweigh risks favoring rivaroxaban per Monte Carlo simulation., Conclusions: These analyses show a favorable benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban therapy in the VOYAGER PAD trial, with findings generally consistent between the unweighted and weighted approaches.