Search

Alitretinoin is an endogenous retinoid and acts as a pan-agonist at retinoid receptors, binding with high affinity to both retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors (RXR). Oral alitretinoin once daily is approved for use in patients with severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to treatment with potent topical corticosteroids. In a large (n = 1032), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (BACH) of up to 24 weeks' duration in adults with severe chronic hand eczema, significantly more patients in the alitretinoin 10 or 30 mg/day groups than in the placebo group responded to treatment with clear/almost clear hands, as assessed by the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) [primary endpoint]. In an extension phase of the BACH study, alitretinoin was effective in patients who relapsed after responding to initial treatment with the drug. Of patients who had responded to initial treatment with alitretinoin 30 mg/day, significantly more alitretinoin 30 mg/day than placebo recipients responded on the PGA with clear/almost clear hands during the extension phase (primary endpoint; 80% vs 8%). Of those who had responded to initial treatment with alitretinoin 10 mg/day, 48% of alitretinoin 10 mg/day and 10% of placebo recipients responded during the extension phase. Alitretinoin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials excluding pregnant women. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events and abnormal laboratory test results were consistent with those previously observed with other oral retinoids and RXR agonists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mirtazapine (Remeron, Zispin) is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) that is approved in many counties for use in the treatment of major depression. Monotherapy with mirtazapine 15-45 mg/day leads to rapid and sustained improvements in depressive symptoms in patients with major depression, including the elderly. It is as effective as other antidepressants and may have a more rapid onset of action than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Furthermore, it may also have a higher sustained remission rate than amitriptyline. Preliminary data suggest that mirtazapine may also be effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders (including post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder), obsessive-compulsive disorder, undifferentiated somatoform disorder and, as add-on therapy, in schizophrenia, although large, well designed trials are needed to confirm these findings. Mirtazapine is generally well tolerated in patients with depression. In conclusion, mirtazapine is an effective antidepressant for the treatment of major depression and also has the potential to be of use in other psychiatric indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Darunavir is an oral nonpeptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) that is used, together with a low boosting dose of ritonavir, as part of an antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen in treatment-experienced and -naive patients with HIV-1 infection. Compared with early-generation PIs, boosted darunavir has a high genetic barrier to resistance and is active against multidrug-resistant HIV isolates. In clinical trials in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection receiving an optimized background regimen (OBR), twice-daily boosted darunavir was more effective than investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted control PIs (CPIs) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. In clinical trials in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection receiving a fixed background regimen, once-daily boosted darunavir was noninferior to boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks and more effective than boosted lopinavir at 96weeks. Boosted darunavir was generally well tolerated in patients with HIV-1 infection in clinical trials. It was associated with a lower incidence of diarrhoea than CPIs or lopinavir in treatment-experienced or -naive patients, and fewer lipid abnormalities than lopinavir in treatment-naive patients. Thus, for the management of treatment-experienced or -naive patients with HIV-1 infection, a ritonavir-boosted darunavir-based ART regimen is a valuable treatment option. Darunavir is an oral nonpeptidic HIV-1 PI that selectively inhibits the cleavage of HIV gag and gag-pol polyproteins, thereby preventing viral maturation. Darunavir is highly potent against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of wild-type and multidrug-resistant HIV and has limited cytotoxicity. In an in vitro study in MT-2 cells, the potency of darunavir was greater than that of saquinavir, amprenavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir. Darunavir binds with high affinity to HIV-1 protease, including multidrug-resistant proteases, and retains potency against multidrug-resistant HIV-1 strains. Although some potential may exist for cross-resistance with amprenavir, darunavir did not display cross-resistance with other PIs in vitro. In a 24-week analysis of pooled data from the POWER 1 and 2 studies in treatment-experienced patients, 11 protease mutations associated with a reduced response to boosted darunavir were identified (V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54L/M, G73S, L76V, I84V and L89V). The presence of at least three darunavir resistance-associated mutations (prevalent in approximately 7-9% of treatment-experienced patients) together with a high number of protease resistance-associated mutations were required to confer darunavir resistance. In the 48-week analysis of treatment-experienced patients with virological failure in the the TITAN study, fewer in the boosted darunavir group than in the boosted lopinavir group developed additional mutations or lost susceptibility to PIs compared with baseline. In treatment-naive patients, no primary PI-resistance-associated mutations developed in patients with an available genotype at baseline and endpoint during 96 weeks of treatment with boosted darunavir or boosted lopinavir. Oral darunavir, boosted with low-dose ritonavir, is rapidly absorbed, generally reaching peak plasma concentrations within 2.5-4 hours. The bioavailability of oral darunavir is increased by about 30% when taken with food. Darunavir is primarily metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, primarily CYP3A. The 'boosting' dose of ritonavir acts an an inhibitor of CYP3A, thereby increasing darunavir bioavailability. Drug interactions can result when darunavir is coadministered with other drugs that are inducers or inhibitors of, or act as substrates for, CYP3A. The mean elimination half-life of boosted darunavir is approximately 15 hours. In treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection, the therapeutic efficacy of oral twice-daily darunavir 600 mg, boosted with ritonavir 100 mg, versus that of investigator selected boosted CPIs (POWER studies) or versus twice-daily boosted lopinavir (administered as a fixed dose combination of lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg) [TITAN study] has been evaluated in phase IIb and III studies. All patients received concurrent treatment with an OBR. Significantly more patients receiving boosted darunavir achieved a viral load reduction from baseline of >/=1 log(10) copies/mL (primary endpoint) than boosted CPI recipients at all timepoints, up to and including the final efficacy analysis at 144 weeks, in the combined analyses of POWER 1 and 2. The efficacy of boosted darunavir was noninferior to that of boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks, and was significantly better than boosted lopinavir at 48 and 96 weeks in the TITAN study, as determined by significantly more patients in the darunavir group than in the lopinavir group achieving a viral load of <400 copies/mL (primary endpoint). In the ARTEMIS study in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection receiving a fixed background regimen of tenofovir and emtricitabine, once-daily boosted darunavir 800 mg was noninferior to boosted lopinavir 800 mg/day at 48 weeks. At 96 weeks, boosted darunavir was found to be more effective than boosted lopinavir, as determined by significantly more patients in the darunavir group than in the lopinavir group achieving a confirmed plasma viral load of <50 copies/mL (primary endpoint). Boosted darunavir was generally well tolerated in patients with HIV-1 infection in clinical trials, with most events being mild to moderate in severity. At 48-week analyses, the most common adverse events associated with once- or twice-daily boosted darunavir in treatment-experienced or -naive patients were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. The most common boosted darunavir-related grade 2-4 laboratory abnormalities in treatment-experienced patients included increased triglycerides and increased total cholesterol. Overall, boosted darunavir was associated with less diarrhoea than CPIs or boosted lopinavir in treatment-experienced and -naive patients, and a lower incidence of grade 2-4 elevations in triglycerides and total cholesterol than boosted lopinavir in treatment-naive patients. Treatment discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 3% of boosted darunavir recipients and 7% of boosted lopinavir recipients during 48 weeks of therapy in treatment-naive patients. Healthcare costs in the UK and US were estimated to be lower with boosted darunavir than with investigator-selected CPIs in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in two 1-year cost analyses conducted from the perspective of a healthcare provider and using predicted costs based on CD4+ cell counts and clinical data from the POWER studies. The higher acquisition cost of boosted darunavir compared with CPIs was more than offset by the better efficacy of darunavir. In modelled cost-effectiveness analyses, boosted darunavir was predicted to be cost effective compared with other boosted CPIs in heavily pretreated adults from a healthcare payer perspective in Europe and from a societal perspective in the US. In a further model of a subgroup of patients with at least one primary International AIDS Society-USA PI mutation, boosted darunavir was predicted to be cost effective compared with boosted lopinavir from a healthcare payer perspective in Europe. The incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained were within commonly accepted thresholds in all cost-effectiveness analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zoledronic acid (Aclasta((R)); Reclast((R))), a third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is the first once-yearly treatment to have been approved for use in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis or at high risk of fracture. Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg once yearly is effective in reducing the risk of several types of fracture in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis or recent low-trauma hip fracture. Moreover, improvements in bone mineral density (BMD) and reductions in markers of bone turnover are also generally observed. Zoledronic acid is generally well tolerated. Additional comparative data are required to definitively position zoledronic acid with respect to other agents. In the meantime, intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg once yearly is a convenient and effective treatment option that may have an advantage over some other agents, for which adherence to treatment regimens is a recognized problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to obtain validity evidence for the Physical Activity and Healthy Food Efficacy Scale for Children (PAHFE). Construct validity evidence identifies four subscales: Goal-Setting for Physical Activity, Goal-Setting for Healthy Food Choices, Decision-Making for Physical Activity, and Decision-Making for Healthy Food Choices. The scores on each of these subscales show a moderate to high degree of internal consistency (0.59

Sixteen participants performed a military operations simulation directing loading of helicopters to weight capacity within an allotted timeframe and subject to a set of decision rules. The participants stood, walked or jogged on a treadmill while performing the simulated cognitive task. Task performance was measured in terms of helicopter loading rate and accuracy. Situation awareness (SA) was measured using a simulation freeze technique and SA queries. Subjective workload was measured using the NASA-TLX. Results indicated a general trend of decreasing SA with increasing physical workload for perceptual knowledge, comprehension and overall SA. Results also revealed higher subjective workload during jogging than during the walking and standing conditions. However, the physical workload manipulations did not appear to affect cognitive task performance. This study has practical implications for defining physical and cognitive workloads in specific dynamic, complex work environments to support operator SA and performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

* Mesalazine appears to act locally on the mucosa of the colon and reduces the inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis. * Following oral administration, the majority (*78%) of a dose of delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine passes unabsorbed through the upper gastrointestinal tract to reach and traverse the entire length of the colon. * In a well designed phase III trial in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (n = 262), significantly (p < 0.01) more MMX mesalazine 2.4 (34%) or 4.8 g/day (29%) recipients than placebo recipients (13%) achieved clinical and endoscopic remission after 8 weeks of treatment.* In a second phase III trial (n = 341), clinical and endoscopic remission rates with MMX mesalazine 2.4 (40.5%) and 4.8 g/day (41.2%) were significantly (p < 0.01) greater than with placebo (22.1%) after 8 weeks, while the remission rate with non-MMX delayed-release mesalazine (Asacol) [32.6%] did not differ from placebo.* Overall, MMX mesalazine was generally well tolerated in controlled clinical trials, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in placebo (66%) and MMX mesalazine (56%) recipients in a pooled analysis; most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. Two of 434 MMX mesalazine recipients experienced serious adverse events that were considered treatment related (pancreatitis caused by mesalazine sensitivity). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Topically administered dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (dorzolamide/timolol ophthalmic solution; Cosopt(R)) is a fixed combination of two ocular hypotensive drugs (the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol) that have an additive effect on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) when administered together. This product is indicated for the treatment of elevated IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OH) who are insufficiently responsive to topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. As such, it can be considered for use in individuals who, as a consequence of failing to achieve target IOP with beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy, require the addition or substitution of another class of topical antiglaucoma medication. Clinical trials have demonstrated that dorzolamide/timolol (1 drop per eye twice daily) is an effective and generally well tolerated fixed combination for lowering IOP in patients with open angle glaucoma or OH, including individuals uncontrolled on beta-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. Compared with concomitant therapy with the individual components, the primary advantage of fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol is convenience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A subcutaneously administered, live, high-titre (18,700-60,000 plaque-forming units per dose) varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccine (zoster vaccine) of the Oka/Merck strain has been evaluated for the prevention of herpes zoster and the reduction of zoster-associated pain in adults aged > or =60 years. Zoster vaccine, when compared with placebo, reduced the burden of herpes zoster illness by 61%, the incidence of herpes zoster by 51% and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia by 67% during more than 3 years of surveillance. The zoster vaccine caused an initial 1.7-fold rise in VZV antibody titre after 6 weeks that declined progressively over 3 years. Increases in gamma-interferon-secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells were 2.2-fold greater with the zoster vaccine than with placebo 6 weeks after vaccination. Zoster vaccine was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse reactions following vaccination were injection-site reactions; the only systemic adverse event with zoster vaccine that differed significantly in incidence from that with placebo was headache. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent recombinant vaccine is a mixture of virus-like particles derived from the L1 capsid proteins of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18. It is administered intramuscularly in a three-dose regimen, with the initial injection followed by subsequent doses at months 2 and 6. The vaccine is indicated for use in the prevention of cervical cancer, vulvar and vaginal precancer and cancers, precancerous lesions and genital warts associated with HPV types 6, 11, 16 or 18 infection in adolescents and young women. The quadrivalent vaccine has demonstrated good immunogenicity in young women (16-26 years) and male and female adolescents (aged 9-15 years), inducing high and persistent anti-HPV antibody titres. In a randomised phase III trial designed to bridge efficacy in young women to adolescents (using immunogenicity as a surrogate), the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in adolescents was at least as immunogenic as that in young women. In randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in >20 000 young women (aged 16-26 years), the vaccine was highly effective in preventing cervical dysplasia of any grade and external genital lesions related to HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 infection. These women were followed up for an average of 2 years. The vaccine was well tolerated, with injection-site reactions and fever being the most common vaccine-related adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab (MabThera((R)), Rituxan((R))) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces lysis and apoptosis of normal and malignant human B cells, and sensitises malignant B cells to the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy. In phase III trials in patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), intravenous rituximab in combination with chemotherapy was more effective as first- or second-line therapy than chemotherapy alone in providing tumour remission and patient survival. Likewise, in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), rituximab in combination with chemotherapy appeared more effective than chemotherapy alone as either first- or second-line treatment. In addition, rituximab maintenance therapy was shown to significantly prolong tumour remission and patient survival in patients with indolent B-cell NHL or CLL. The combination of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) was cost effective as first-line therapy for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell NHL compared with CHOP alone. Rituximab, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, was generally well tolerated in patients with NHL or CLL. Overall, rituximab in combination with chemotherapy, is a valuable option for first- and second-line therapy in patients with advanced-stage indolent or aggressive B-cell NHL, and possibly those with B-cell CLL, and is included in current treatment guidelines for these indications. The drug is also potentially useful as maintenance therapy in patients with indolent B-cell NHL or CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prulifloxacin, the prodrug of ulifloxacin, is a broad-spectrum oral fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. After absorption, prulifloxacin is metabolised by esterases to ulifloxacin. The drug has a long elimination half-life, allowing once-daily administration. Ulifloxacin is generally more active in vitro than other fluoroquinolones against a variety of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria, including community and nosocomial isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus, Providencia and Morganella spp., Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus spp. The activity of ulifloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa varies between countries. Gram-positive organisms, including meticillin- or oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Italian community isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae are susceptible to ulifloxacin. Activity against Spanish strains of S. pneumoniae is moderate. In well designed clinical trials, good clinical and bacteriological efficacy (similar to that of ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or pefloxacin) was seen with prulifloxacin 600 mg once daily for 10 days in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or complicated lower urinary tract infections (UTIs), and with single-dose prulifloxacin 600 mg in acute, uncomplicated lower UTIs. Prulifloxacin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with a similar tolerability profile to that of ciprofloxacin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aripiprazole, a quinolinone derivative, is an atypical antipsychotic drug indicated for the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia. Aripiprazole 10 or 15 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Although aripiprazole has only been directly compared with haloperidol and olanzapine in treatment-responsive patients to date, current data generally indicate that aripiprazole has a beneficial profile in terms of a low potential for bodyweight gain. Dosage titration is not necessary and the drug is effective in the first few weeks of treatment. Head-to-head comparative trials with atypical antipsychotic agents are required, as are long-term (> or =1 year) studies, to fully define the position of aripiprazole in relation to other antipsychotic drugs. Aripiprazole is a valuable new therapeutic option in the management of patients with schizophrenia. PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES: Aripiprazole is a quinolinone derivative with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors, and serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors. The mechanism of action of aripiprazole is not yet known, but evidence suggests that its efficacy in the treatment of the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and its lower propensity for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) may be attributable to aripiprazole's partial agonist activity at dopamine D2 receptors. At serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, in vitro studies have shown that aripiprazole acts as a partial agonist whereas at serotonin 5-HT2A receptors aripiprazole is an antagonist. The main active metabolite, dehydro-aripiprazole, has affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and thus has some pharmacological activity similar to that of the parent compound. Aripiprazole is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. The mean time to peak plasma concentration is 3 hours following multiple-dose administration of aripiprazole 10 or 15 mg and the absolute oral bioavailability of the drug is 87%. Steady-state plasma drug concentrations are achieved by 14 days; however, the drug appears to accumulate over this period, since mean peak plasma concentration and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve values of aripiprazole 10 or 15 mg/day are 4-fold greater on day 14 than on day 1. This accumulation may be expected, since the mean elimination half-life of a single dose of aripiprazole is about 75 hours. Aripiprazole has extensive extravascular distribution and more than 99% of aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole (the main active metabolite of aripiprazole) is bound to plasma protein. Elimination of the drug is primarily hepatic; the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP2D6 enzyme systems transform aripiprazole to dehydro-aripiprazole, with the latter enzyme system subject to genetic polymorphism. Thus, dosage adjustment of aripiprazole is necessary when it is coadministered with CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibitors (since aripiprazole concentration is increased) and with inducers of CYP3A4 (since aripiprazole concentration is decreased). THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY: The efficacy of aripiprazole has been demonstrated in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. In general, significant reductions from baseline in mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total, positive and negative symptom scores, and Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness scores were observed in patients with acute relapse of chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving recommended (10 or 15 mg/day) or higher-than-recommended (20 or 30 mg/day) dosages of aripiprazole versus those receiving placebo in three well controlled, short-term trials. No additional therapeutic benefit was observed at the higher-than-recommended dosages. The drug is effective as early as the first or second week of treatment. The efficacy of aripiprazole was maintained for up to 52 weeks. The drug was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing relapse in patients with stable chronic schizophrenia in a 26-week, randomised trial. In a 52-week trial in patients with acute relapse of schizophrenia, the percentage of responders maintaining a response at study end was 77% of aripiprazole versus 73% of haloperidol recipients. Aripiprazole may improve cognitive function. In a nonblind, 26-week trial, patients with chronic schizophrenia receiving aripiprazole 30 mg/day experienced similar (general cognitive function) or better (verbal learning) changes from baseline in the neurocognitive parameters evaluated compared with recipients of olanzapine 10-15 mg/day. TOLERABILITY: Aripiprazole 10-30 mg/day was generally well tolerated. The tolerability profile of aripiprazole was broadly similar to that observed with placebo in a meta-analysis of short-term trials in patients with acute relapse of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and in a 26-week trial in patients with chronic stable schizophrenia. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events included insomnia and anxiety, and additionally, headache and agitation (in short-term trials) or akathisia and psychosis (in a 52-week trial). In general, the drug was associated with a placebo-level incidence of EPS and EPS-related adverse events. Significantly fewer aripiprazole recipients experienced EPS-related adverse events than haloperidol recipients in a 52-week trial. Changes in severity of EPS were minimal and usually no different from those observed with placebo. Moreover, there was less severe EPS in the aripiprazole group than the haloperidol group in a long-term trial. Treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia was reported in only 0.2% of patients receiving aripiprazole (short-term trials), an incidence similar to that seen in placebo recipients (0.2%). Aripiprazole has a low propensity to cause clinically significant bodyweight gain, hyperprolactinaemia or corrected QT interval prolongation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. In addition, there were no clinically relevant differences in mean changes from baseline in measures of diabetes and dyslipidaemia between the aripiprazole or placebo groups in a 26-week, placebo-controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant that blocks growth factor-mediated proliferation of haematopoietic and nonhaematopoietic cells. Oral everolimus 0.75 or 1.5mg twice daily significantly reduced the incidence of the primary composite endpoint, efficacy failure 6 months after transplantation, compared with azathioprine 1-3 mg/kg/day, in adult cardiac transplant recipients. All patients also received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporin and corticosteroids. The incidence of efficacy failure remained significantly lower in everolimus recipients than in those receiving azathioprine 1 and 2 years after cardiac transplantation. However, graft and patient survival rates at 1 year were similar in patients receiving everolimus or azathioprine. The incidence of graft vasculopathy 2 years after transplantation was significantly lower in cardiac transplant recipients receiving everolimus 0.75 mg twice daily than in those receiving azathioprine. The combined incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up was similar in adult patients receiving everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/day or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day 1 or 3 years after renal transplantation. Patients also received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporin and corticosteroids. Compared with azathioprine and MMF, everolimus is associated with a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in cardiac and renal transplant recipients. Everolimus has been associated with thrombocytopenia, leucopenia and elevated serum lipids and creatinine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Budesonide/formoterol is a fixed-dose combination of the corticosteroid budesonide and the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol, and is inhaled via the Turbuhaler device. In two large, randomised, double-blind, 12-month studies, patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg twice daily had a significantly higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and significantly higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow at trial endpoint than recipients of budesonide or placebo; FEV1 was significantly higher than with formoterol in the larger study. In both studies, the rate of COPD exacerbations and exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids was significantly reduced with budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol and placebo. Moreover, the time to first exacerbation was significantly prolonged with budesonide/formoterol versus all other treatment arms in the larger study. At 12 months, significant improvements in health-related quality-of-life scores were seen with budesonide/formoterol versus placebo in both studies. The reduction in total and individual symptom scores was significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide or placebo in the smaller study. Budesonide/formoterol was generally well tolerated by patients with severe COPD. The tolerability profile of the combination was similar to that of the individual components with no increase in the incidence of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfuvirtide is the first of a new class of drugs, the fusion inhibitors. It is a synthetic peptide which binds to the HIV glycoprotein 41 (gp41), blocking fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. HIV isolates with reduced susceptibility to enfuvirtide have been recovered from patients receiving enfuvirtide in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Enfuvirtide 90mg (subcutaneously, twice daily) in combination with optimised background (OB) antiretroviral therapy significantly reduced plasma HIV RNA levels compared with OB alone after treatment for 24 weeks in two randomised trials involving adults with advanced HIV infection. The antiviral efficacy of enfuvirtide was maintained through to 48 weeks. At 24 and 48 weeks, the increase from baseline in the CD4+ cell count was significantly greater for patients receiving enfuvirtide plus OB than for those receiving OB alone. Enfuvirtide 30 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/m(2) in combination with other antiretroviral agents reduced plasma HIV RNA levels and increased CD4+ cell counts in a small trial involving paediatric patients with HIV infection. Local injection-site reactions were common. Lymphadenopathy and pneumonia occurred more often in patients receiving enfuvirtide plus OB than in the control group. The incidence of most other events was similar in each group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucosamine occurs naturally in all human tissues. It stimulates the synthesis of glycosaminoglycan, proteoglycan and hyaluronic acid, although the precise mechanism of action remains to be established. Formulated as glucosamine sulphate (Dona) and various others), glucosamine has been evaluated for its efficacy in relieving the symptoms of osteoarthritis and its disease-modifying potential.In two large randomised, double-blind, multicentre studies in patients with osteoarthritis, oral or intramuscular glucosamine for 4-6 weeks was associated with a greater decrease in symptom severity (as assessed by the Lequesne index) than placebo. In addition, there was a greater proportion of responders (defined as patients with a >or=3-point reduction in the Lequesne index, along with a positive overall assessment by the investigator) at the end of the treatment period with glucosamine than with placebo. In two large 4-week trials, oral glucosamine produced similar improvements to ibuprofen in the Lequesne index in one study and in articular pain scores in the other study. In a smaller 8-week comparative trial, oral glucosamine therapy achieved a significantly greater improvement in articular pain score than ibuprofen, and the investigators rated treatment efficacy as 'good' in a significantly greater proportion of glucosamine than ibuprofen recipients. In comparison with piroxicam, glucosamine significantly improved arthritic symptoms after 12 weeks of therapy and remained effective 8 weeks after treatment was discontinued. Beneficial effects of long-term oral glucosamine therapy in preventing joint space narrowing and improving symptoms were shown in two 3-year placebo-controlled trials in a total of 414 patients with osteoarthritis. Statistically significant differences favouring glucosamine were noted in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses for the primary endpoints for both joint structural changes and symptom modification. Glucosamine has a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo and is better tolerated than ibuprofen or piroxicam. In particular, glucosamine recipients had a markedly lower incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances than those receiving ibuprofen. Other adverse events reported in both glucosamine and ibuprofen recipients were pruritus or skin reactions, flushing and fatigue. In general, a lower incidence of withdrawal from clinical trials was reported for glucosamine recipients than either ibuprofen or piroxicam recipients.CONCLUSION: In short-term clinical trials, glucosamine provided effective symptomatic relief for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. In addition, glucosamine has shown promising results in modifying the progression of arthritis over a 3-year period. Glucosamine may therefore prove to be a useful treatment option for osteoarthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania.Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brinzolamide is a highly specific carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor which lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by reducing the rate of aqueous humour formation. Formulated as a 1% ophthalmic suspension (Azopt) and administered twice or three times daily, brinzolamide is indicated for the topical management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH) as either monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with topical beta-blockers. As monotherapy in patients with POAG or OH, brinzolamide 1% demonstrated IOP-lowering efficacy that was significantly greater than placebo, equivalent to three-times-daily dorzolamide 2% but significantly lower than twice-daily timolol 0.5%. Brinzolamide 1% was equally effective in twice- and three-times-daily regimens producing diurnal mean IOP reductions from baseline in the range of 13.2-21.8%. When used adjunctively twice daily with timolol 0.5%, brinzolamide 1% was as effective as dorzolamide 2% and superior to placebo in lowering IOP in patients with POAG or OH. In clinical trials, brinzolamide 1% was well tolerated causing only nonserious adverse effects that were generally local, transient and mild to moderate in severity. The incidence of the most common adverse events associated with the use of brinzolamide 1% was either similar to (blurred vision and abnormal taste) or significantly lower than (ocular discomfort) with dorzolamide 2%. Topical brinzolamide 1% does not appear to produce the acid-base or electrolyte disturbances and severe systemic adverse effects characteristic of oral CA inhibitors. It can be used in patients unresponsive to beta-blockers or in whom beta-blockers are contraindicated. Brinzolamide 1% administered twice daily is among the least costly alternatives and adjuncts to beta-blocker therapy for glaucoma and is generally associated with less direct medical cost than dorzolamide. CONCLUSION: Brinzolamide 1% ophthalmic suspension administered twice or three times daily, as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with topical beta-blockers, has good IOP-lowering efficacy in patients with POAG or OH that is equivalent to that of dorzolamide 2% (three times daily as monotherapy, twice daily as adjunctive therapy). Brinzolamide is generally well tolerated and does not produce the systemic adverse effects associated with oral CA inhibitors. It can be used in patients who are unresponsive to, intolerant of, or unable to receive, ophthalmic beta-blockers. Thus, brinzolamide, either as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with topical beta-blockers, should be regarded as a good second-line option in the pharmacological management of POAG and OH, and may be preferred over dorzolamide because of significantly less ocular discomfort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atazanavir is a novel azapeptide protease inhibitor with high specificity for, and activity against, HIV-1 protease. The resistance profile of atazanavir is distinct, with an I50 L protease substitution appearing to be the signature mutation. Atazanavir was not associated with increases in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol or triglyceride levels after 108 weeks. Atazanavir has a pharmacokinetic profile that allows for once-daily oral administration. It is a moderate inhibitor of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes and interacts with several drugs. In combination with stavudine plus didanosine, atazanavir 200, 400 or 500 mg once daily produced a rapid and sustained reduction from baseline in viral load of 2.57, 2.42 and 2.53 log(10) copies/mL, respectively, in treatment-naive patients after 48 weeks, compared with a decrease of 2.33 log(10) copies/mL with nelfinavir 750 mg three times daily. Nausea was the most clinically relevant adverse event reported in patients receiving atazanavir-based regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The triple combination tablet containing lamivudine (150 mg), zidovudine (300 mg) and abacavir (300 mg, as abacavir sulfate) is a new formulation of three nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Two studies in treatment-naive patients (one double-blind, one nonblind) have reported that lamivudine/zidovudine (dual combination tablet) plus abacavir showed efficacy similar to that of lamivudine/zidovudine plus indinavir. In both studies, similar numbers of patients in each treatment group had plasma HIV RNA levels 400 copies/mL, was reported in 22% of patients in both treatment groups at week 48. Treatment-naive patients receiving lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir combination therapy experienced several adverse events, including nausea, malaise/fatigue and vomiting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases associated with the KIT protein (stem cell factor receptor), ABL protein and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. The KIT tyrosine kinase is abnormally expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), a rare neoplasm for which there has been no effective systemic therapy. In a randomised, nonblind, multicentre study that evaluated imatinib 400 or 600mg once daily in 147 patients with advanced GIST, confirmed partial responses were achieved in 54% of patients overall (median duration of follow-up was 288 days). Stable disease was experienced by 28% of patients and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 88%. Similar response rates were reported in a smaller, dose-escalation study, in which objective tumour response was a secondary endpoint. Although nearly all patients with GIST treated with imatinib experienced adverse events, most events were mild or moderate in nature. Severe or serious adverse events occurred in 21% of patients in the larger study, and included gastrointestinal or tumour haemorrhage. The control of cellular processes, such as cell growth, division and death, involves signal transduction, which commonly involves the transfer of phosphate from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to tyrosine residues on substrate proteins, by tyrosine kinase enzymes. Activation of oncogenes coding for kinase proteins can lead to the production of kinases that are continually active in the absence of a normal stimulus,leading to increased cell proliferation and/or decreased apoptosis. A major focus of cancer research in recent years has been to identify oncogenic molecules and the signal transduction pathways in which they are involved, in order to develop specifically targeted drugs. One such drug is imatinib mesylate (imatinib, Glivic/Gleevec), an orally administered 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative that is a competitive inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases associated with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors, the Abelson (ABL) protein and the KIT protein (also known as stem cell factor [SCF] receptor). Imatinib was initially evaluated for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) [reviewed previously in Drugs]. More recently, imatinib has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), in which KIT, a tyrosine kinase receptor, is abnormally expressed. GISTs are soft tissue gastrointestinal sarcomas probably arising from mesenchymal cells. They are rare neoplasms, with between 5000 and 10 000 new cases being diagnosed each year in the US. GISTs occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract but the stomach and small intestine are the most common sites. Symptoms depend on the site and size of the tumour, and may include abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding or signs of obstruction; small tumours may be asymptomatic. The diagnosis of GIST is made by immunohistochemical staining for CD117, a cell surface antigen on the extracellular domain of KIT, in conjunction with pathological examination of tissue with light microscopy. All GISTs may have some degree of malignant potential. They are unresponsive to standard chemotherapy and to radiotherapy, and the mainstay of treatment in the past has been surgery. However, recurrence rates are high, and there has been no effective systemic treatment for unresectable GIST or metastatic disease. For patients in whom complete resection is not possible, or in patients with metastatic or recurrent disease, the median duration of survival is 9-12 months, and 10-19 months, respectively. Gain-of-function mutations of the KIT proto-oncogene occur in up to 90% of GISTs, allowing constitutive activation of tyrosine kinase (i.e. auto-phosphorylation of tyrosine residues independent of ligand-receptor binding), leading to aberrant cell division and tumour growth. Imatinib selectively inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity associated with KIT, which forms the rationale for evaluating its effects in GIST. Subsequent to initial evidence of the clinical efficacy of imatinib in a single patient with progressive, metastatic, CD117-positive GIST, formal studies of imatinib in this new indication were initiated. This article summarises the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability profile of imatinib in the treatment of patients with advanced GIST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Augmentin), Augmentin ES-600 is a well established, orally administered combination of amoxicillin (a semisynthetic antibacterial agent) and clavulanic acid (a beta-lactamase inhibitor). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid shows good activity against the main pathogens associated with acute otitis media (AOM), including penicillin-susceptible and -intermediate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and beta-lactamase producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. It has moderate activity against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae; a high-dose formulation has been developed with the aim of providing better coverage for penicillin-resistant strains. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (conventional formulations, mostly 40/10 mg/kg/day in three divided doses) produced clinical response rates similar to those of oral cephalosporin comparators and similar to or significantly greater than those for intramuscular ceftriaxone in randomised trials in paediatric patients with AOM (mean age approximately 2 to 5 years). Clinical response rates were generally similar for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and macrolide comparators (mean patient age approximately 1 to 6 years), although significantly better clinical and bacteriological responses were seen versus azithromycin in one randomised trial (mean patient age approximately 1 year). The high-dose formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90/6.4 mg/kg/day in two divided doses) eradicated a high proportion of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (penicillin MICs 2 or 4 mg/L) in a large noncomparative trial in children with AOM (upper limit of the US indication for S. pneumoniae is 2 mg/L). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is generally well tolerated. A low total incidence of adverse events (3.6%) and no serious events were reported from a large paediatric postmarketing study. The most frequently reported adverse events in children are mild gastrointestinal disturbances. Diarrhoea is generally less frequent with twice-daily than with three-times-daily treatment. The new high-dose formulation showed similar tolerability to a conventional twice-daily formulation (45/6.4 mg/kg/day) in a well controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is a well established broad-spectrum antibacterial treatment which is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of AOM in paediatric patients. The high-dose combination should prove valuable in treating AOM caused by penicillin-intermediate and -resistant S. pneumoniae (approved in the US for penicillin MIC < or =2 mg/L). Based on recent recommendations and the available data, high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid can be considered a treatment of choice for recurrent or persistent paediatric AOM (after failure of amoxicillin alone) where involvement of resistant pathogens is suspected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is a prodrug which is rapidly hydrolysed after absorption to the active metabolite ramiprilat. Earlier trials have shown that ACE inhibitors, when given to patients with low ejection fractions, have reduced the relative risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and other ischaemic events by 14 to 23%. Subsequently, the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study has shown that, in patients who are not known to have low ejection fraction or heart failure but are at increased risk for developing cardiovascular events, ramipril reduced the incidence of stroke, MI and death due to cardiovascular disease. Results from the HOPE study, in which 9297 patients were randomised to receive either ramipril 10 mg/day or placebo for a mean of 4.5 years, indicate that ramipril reduced the relative risk of the composite outcome of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death by 22%. The incidence of the composite outcome was significantly lower in the ramipril group than in the placebo group (14.0 vs 17.8%). Patients who received ramipril, compared with placebo recipients, had a significantly decreased incidence of stroke, MI or death due to cardiovascular disease (3.4 vs 4.9%, 9.9 vs 12.3% and 6.1 vs 8.1%, respectively). The relative risk of death from any cause was reduced among patients who received ramipril. In addition, treatment with ramipril reduced as the incidence of revascularisation procedures, and, among patients with diabetes mellitus, ramipril reduced the incidence of complications related to diabetes mellitus, including the development of overt nephropathy. Moreover, in patients without a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, ramipril, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the development of diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, compared with patients receiving placebo, patients receiving ramipril had a reduced rate of progression of carotid artery wall thickness. CONCLUSION: Ramipril 10 mg/day can significantly reduce the incidence of MI, stroke or death from cardiovascular causes in patients aged > or =55 years who are at increased risk for the development of ischaemic cardiovascular events due to a history of stroke, coronary artery disease (with controlled blood pressure), diabetes mellitus plus at least one other risk factor or peripheral vascular disease but no heart failure or low ejection fraction. Therefore, in addition to dietary and lifestyle modifications, ramipril should be an integral part of secondary prevention therapy in patients at increased risk for the development of cardiovascular events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drotrecogin alfa (activated), recombinant human activated protein C, inhibits coagulation and inflammation and promotes fibrinolysis in patients with severe sepsis. 850 patients with severe sepsis treated with intravenous drotrecogin alfa (activated) 24 microg/kg/h for 96 hours had a significantly greater reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality (24.7%) than 840 placebo recipients (30.8%) in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The drug was associated with a 19.4% reduction in the relative risk of death at 28 days compared with placebo. Baseline characteristics of and pre-existing conditions in patients with sepsis appeared to have no effect on the efficacy of drotrecogin alfa (activated). A significantly greater reduction in median percentage change from baseline plasma D-dimer levels (a coagulation marker) was seen with drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment than with placebo on study days 1 to 7 in patients with severe sepsis. On study days 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7, a significantly greater median reduction in interleukin-6 levels (an inflammation marker) from baseline was seen with drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment than placebo. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) was associated with an increased incidence of serious bleeding events during the infusion period [2.4% vs 1.0% with placebo; p = 0.024] and the 28-day study period (3.5 vs 2.0%; p = 0.06) of the efficacy trial. This increase was primarily related to procedure-related events; there were no significant differences between the treatment groups in nonprocedure-related serious bleeding events. The most frequent site of bleeding was the gastrointestinal tract. With the exception of bleeding events, there were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups in the efficacy trial in the incidence of adverse events. Of the 210 deaths in patients with severe sepsis treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) 24 microg/kg/h in the efficacy trial, four deaths due to haemorrhage and one due to cerebral oedema were possibly related to the study drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bimatoprost, a synthetic prostamide analogue, is a new ocular hypotensive agent indicated for the second-line treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The drug is formulated as a 0.03% ophthalmic solution. Bimatoprost lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing aqueous humour outflow. When applied topically once daily in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma, bimatoprost 0.03% significantly reduced IOP. Mean IOP was reduced by approximately 7.5 to 9.2mm Hg 12 hours after drug administration in randomised clinical trials. The reduction in IOP was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval. Once-daily treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% was found to be significantly more effective than timolol 0.5% (administered twice daily as an ophthalmic solution or once daily as a gel-forming solution) in randomised comparative trials in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Furthermore, after 1 to 6 months' treatment, the percentage of patients reaching a target IOP of < or =17mm Hg was significantly greater in the bimatoprost-treated groups than in those receiving timolol. Bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution was found to be at least as effective as topical latanoprost 0.005% administered once daily in two clinical trials. Reductions in IOP 16 and 20 hours postdose were greater in patients treated with bimatoprost, indicating superior control of IOP at timepoints throughout the dosage interval. In patients refractory to beta-blocker therapy, treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% produced greater reductions in diurnal IOP measurements than combination therapy with topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%; approximately twice as many bimatoprost 0.03% recipients achieved an IOP of < or =16mm Hg. The most commonly reported adverse effect during clinical trials of once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% was conjunctival hyperaemia which occurred in 42 to 46% of patients treated. However, most cases were mild and only 1 to 4% of patients withdrew from treatment as a result. Overall withdrawal rates as a result of adverse events during clinical trials ranged from 2.6 to 7%. Bimatoprost has been reported to cause changes in the pigmentation of the periorbital skin, eyelashes and iris, and increase eyelash growth. The long-term consequences of these effects are unknown. Cardiopulmonary adverse effects, which have been associated with the use of beta-blockers such as timolol, were not reported in clinical trials of bimatoprost. Thus, in clinical trials of up to 1-year duration, bimatoprost 0.03% has been found to be effective in significantly lowering IOP and is generally well tolerated. It provides an alternative treatment option for patients in whom beta-blockers are contraindicated. Furthermore, bimatoprost provides an effective second-line treatment option in patients who do not achieve target IOP with other topical ocular hypotensive agents, or who experience unacceptable adverse effects. Wider clinical use of this drug will establish the place of bimatoprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is a new 'pegylated' subcutaneous formulation of interferon-alpha-2a that has been developed to improve on the pharmacokinetic profile and therapeutic efficacy of interferon-alpha-2a. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is produced by the covalent attachment of recombinant interferon-alpha-2a to a branched mobile 40 kD polyethylene glycol moiety, which shields the interferon-alpha-2a molecule from enzymatic degradation, reduces systemic clearance and enables once-weekly administration. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) was significantly more effective than interferon-alpha-2a in interferon-alpha therapy-naive adults with chronic hepatitis C in three nonblind, randomised, multicentre trials. Virological responses (intention-to-treat results) were achieved in 44 to 69% of patients with or without cirrhosis after 48 weeks of treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40kD) 180 microg/week; sustained virological responses 24 weeks after the end of treatment occurred in 30 to 39% of patients. Virological responses at the end of treatment and at long-term follow-up were significantly higher than those achieved with interferon-alpha-2a. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) was significantly more effective than interferon-alpha in patients with or without cirrhosis infected with HCV genotype 1. Sustained biochemical responses achieved with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) 180 microg/week ranged from 34 to 45% and were significantly higher than with interferon-alpha-2a. Recipients of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) also experienced histological improvements; 24 weeks after discontinuation of treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) 180 microg/week, 54 to 63% of patients had a > or =2-point improvement in histological activity index score. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) produced histological responses in patients (with or without cirrhosis) with or without a sustained virological response. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) produced better results than interferon-alpha-2a alone or interferon-alpha-2b plus oral ribavirin on various measures of quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The tolerability profile of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is broadly similar to that of interferon-alpha-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C with or without cirrhosis. Headache, fatigue and myalgia are among the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) administered once weekly produces significantly higher sustained responses, without compromising tolerability, than interferon-alpha-2a administered thrice weekly in noncirrhotic or cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C, including those infected with HCV genotype 1 - a group in whom interferon-alpha treatment has usually been unsuccessful. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is a valuable new treatment option and appears poised to play an important role in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C, including difficult-to-treat patients such as those with compensated cirrhosis and/or those infected with HCV genotype 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amisulpride, a substituted benzamide derivative, is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic. At low doses, it enhances dopaminergic neurotransmission by preferentially blocking presynaptic dopamine D2/D3 autoreceptors. At higher doses, amisupride antagonises postsynaptic dopamine D2 and D3 receptors, preferentially in the limbic system rather than the striatum, thereby reducing dopaminergic transmission. In patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia, the recommended dosage of amisulpride is 400 to 800 mg/day, although dosages < or =1200 mg/day may be administered. In comparative trials, amisulpride administered within this range (400 to 1200 mg/day) was as effective as haloperidol 5 to 40 mg/day, flupenthixol 25 mg/day and risperidone 8 mg/day in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia with predominantly positive symptoms. Amisulpride was more effective than haloperidol but equally effective as risperidone in controlling negative symptoms. Amisulpride 400 to 800 mg/day was more effective than haloperidol, risperidone and flupenthixol in controlling affective symptoms in these patients. In randomised, double-blind trials involving patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia, amisulpride 50 to 300 mg/day was more effective than placebo. Amisulpride is effective as maintenance therapy in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Long-term treatment with amisulpride was associated with improvements in quality of life and social functioning. Amisulpride is generally well tolerated. In well-controlled trials, the neurological tolerability profile (including ratings on extrapyramidal symptom scales) of amisulpride 400 to 1200 mg/day was superior to that of the conventional antipsychotics (haloperidol or flupenthixol), but was similar to that of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone. At low dosages of amisulpride (< or =300 mg/day), the incidence of adverse events (including extrapyramidal symptoms) reported with amisulpride was similar to that with placebo. CONCLUSION: In comparative trials, amisulpride 400 to 1200 mg/day showed efficacy in reducing overall symptomatology and positive symptoms similar to that of conventional antipsychotics and newer atypical antipsychotics in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Moreover, its effective alleviation of negative and affective symptoms, its lower association with extrapyramidal symptoms and loss of cognitive function than conventional antipsychotics and its long-term efficacy justifies consideration of the use of higher dosages of amisulpride in this group of patients. Consequently, the dosage of amisulpride that is recommended in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia is 400 to 800 mg/day, although dosages < or =1200 mg/day may be administered. Lower dosages of amisulpride (50 to 300 mg/day) should be considered for the management of patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Amisulpride is a first-line treatment option in the management of schizophrenia in the acute phase and for the maintenance of treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide immunosuppressant that interferes with the activity of T cells chiefly via calcineurin inhibition. The original oil-based oral formulation of this drug (Sandimmun)l was characterised by high intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, with poor bioavailability in many patients; a novel microemulsion formulation (Neoral)1 was therefore developed to circumvent these problems. Studies show increases, attributable chiefly to improved absorption in patients who absorb the drug only poorly from the original formulation, in mean systemic exposure to cyclosporin with the microemulsion, with no clinically significant differences in tolerability or drug interaction profiles. Cyclosporin microemulsion is at least as effective as the oil-based formulation in renal, liver and heart transplant recipients, with trends towards decreased incidence of acute rejection with the microemulsion formulation in some (statistically significant in a few) trials. Cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus appear to have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection episodes in most renal, pancreas-kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients. However, there are indications of superior efficacy for tacrolimus in some trials, particularly in the prevention of severe acute rejection and in Black transplant recipients. Current 12-month data also indicate equivalent efficacy of sirolimus in renal transplantation. Conversion from the oil-based to microemulsion formulation in stable renal, liver and heart transplant recipients is achievable with no change in acute rejection rates. The addition of an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody and/or mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin microemulsion plus corticosteroids decreases rates of acute rejection; corticosteroid withdrawal without increased acute rejection rates was also achieved on the addition of these agents in some trials. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown savings in direct healthcare costs in kidney or liver transplantation when cyclosporin microemulsion is used in preference to the oil-based formulation, although studies incorporating indirect costs or expressing costs in terms of therapeutic outcomes are currently unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of cyclosporin microemulsion has consolidated the place of the drug as a mainstay of therapy in all types of solid organ transplantation; research into optimisation of outcomes through more effective therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving this formulation is ongoing. Several novel immunosuppressants have been introduced in recent years: further clinical and pharmacoeconomic research will be needed to clarify the relative positioning of these agents, particularly with respect to specific patient groups. Other new drugs (basiliximab/daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil) offer particular advantages when used in combination with cyclosporin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the WHO, approximately 350 million people have chronic hepatitis B. Individuals with chronic hepatitis B have a highly variable and unpredictable clinical course and are at risk for developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lamivudine is the only oral antiviral agent approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B.Lamivudine is useful in a wide range of patients with chronic hepatitis B and ongoing viral replication. In patients with compensated liver disease treated for 52 weeks in multicenter randomized, double-blind clinical studies, lamivudine 100 mg/day inhibited hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, normalized ALT levels, produced significant reductions in hepatic necroinflammatory activity and halted the progression of fibrosis compared with placebo. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rates were also increased during treatment with the drug compared with placebo.In patients who continued to receive the drug after the completion of these trials, improvements in liver histology were maintained and HBeAg seroconversion rates increased in proportion to the duration of treatment.Pretreatment ALT levels were predictive of HBeAg seroconversion. In patients with baseline ALT levels >/= 2-fold higher than the upper limit of normal, seroconversion rates were significantly higher than in those with lower baseline values.Data from 2 randomized studies indicate that sequential therapy with lamivudine for 8 weeks and then lamivudine plus interferon-alpha for 16 weeks provides no greater benefit than that of monotherapy with lamivudine for 52 weeks or interferon-alpha for 16 weeks.According to data from noncomparative studies, lamivudine 100 or 150 mg/day resulted in clinical stabilization, significant reductions in Child-Pugh-Turcotte scores and loss of HBeAg in many patients with decompensated liver disease. Moreover, some patients have been placed on inactive status for liver transplantation after treatment with the drug.Lamivudine-resistant HBV variants have been isolated from patients with chronic hepatitis B during treatment with lamivudine. The prevalence of these variants increases with the duration of treatment; however, their long term clinical significance has not been established.Lamivudine is well tolerated. The frequency of adverse events in lamivudine or placebo recipients was similar in a pooled analysis of clinical trial data. Nonetheless, patients must be monitored for the emergence of lamivudine-resistant variants and elevated liver enzyme levels (ALT flares).In a series of economic models, use of lamivudine was predicted to reduce the cost per case of cirrhosis prevented and increase mean life expectancy compared with use of interferon-alpha in the US. Other analyses, which incorporated a fixed drug budget scenario, concluded that use of lamivudine would increase the number of successfully treated patients by 2- to 3-fold compared with interferon-alpha, because of lower acquisition costs.In conclusion, lamivudine is useful in a wide range of patients with chronic hepatitis B and ongoing vira replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Linezolid is the first of a new class of antibacterial drugs, the oxazolidinones. It has inhibitory activity against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The drug also shows activity against certain anaerobes, including Clostridium perfringens, C. difficile, Peptostreptococcus spp. and Bacteroidesfragilis. In controlled phase III studies, linezolid was as effective as vancomycin in the treatment of patients with infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci and also demonstrated efficacy against infections caused by VRE. Further phase III studies have demonstrated that linezolid is an effective treatment for patients with nosocomial pneumonia, for hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia, and for patients with complicated skin or soft tissue infections (SSTIs). In these studies, linezolid was as effective as established treatments, including third-generation cephalosporins in patients with pneumonia, and oxacillin in patients with complicated SSTIs. Oral linezolid 400 or 600mg twice daily was as effective as clarithromycin 250mg twice daily or cefpodoxime proxetil 200mg twice daily in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated SSTIs or community-acquired pneumonia. Linezolid is a generally well tolerated drug. The most frequently reported adverse events in linezolid recipients were diarrhoea, headache, nausea and vomiting. Thrombocytopenia was also documented in a small proportion (about 2%) of patients treated with the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid has good activity against gram-positive bacteria, particularly multidrug resistant strains of S. aureus (including GISA), Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis (including VRE). In controlled clinical trials, linezolid was as effective as vancomycin in eradicating infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and has demonstrated efficacy against infections caused by VRE. As the level of resistance to vancomycin increases among S. aureus and enterococci, linezolid is poised to play an important role in the management of serious gram-positive infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oseltamivir is a prodrug of oseltamivir carboxylate (Ro 64-0802, GS4071), a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuraminidase glycoprotein essential for replication of influenza A and B viruses. Studies in volunteers with experimental human influenza A or B showed that administration of oral oseltamivir 20 to 200 mg twice daily for 5 days reduced both the quantity and duration of viral shedding compared with placebo. Subsequent assessment of the drug at a dosage of 75 mg twice daily for 5 days in otherwise healthy adults with naturally acquired febrile influenza showed that oseltamivir reduced the duration of the disease by up to 1.5 days and the severity of illness by up to 38% compared with placebo when initiated within 36 hours of symptom onset (earlier initiation of therapy was associated with faster resolution). The incidence of secondary complications and the use of antibacterials were also reduced significantly in oseltamivir recipients. A liquid formulation of oseltamivir (2 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of children with influenza, and data presented in abstracts suggest that the drug may also be of use in high-risk populations such as the elderly or those with chronic cardiac or respiratory disease. In addition to treatment efficacy, the drug has demonstrated efficacy when used for seasonal or household prophylaxis. Oral oseltamivir (75 mg once or twice daily for 6 weeks) during a period of local influenza activity significantly prevented the development of naturally acquired influenza by >70% compared with placebo in unvaccinated otherwise healthy adults. The drug also demonstrated efficacy when used adjunctively in previously vaccinated high-risk elderly patients (92% protective efficacy). Short term administration of oseltamivir (75 mg once daily for 7 days) may significantly reduce the risk of illness in household contacts of infected persons when administered within 48 hours of symptom onset in the infected person. Oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days was well tolerated in clinical trials in healthy adults and high-risk patients, with nausea and vomiting being the most commonly reported events. Gastrointestinal events were mild and transient and both nausea and vomiting were less likely when oseltamivir was taken with food. Conclusions: Oseltamivir is a well tolerated orally active neuraminidase inhibitor which significantly reduces the duration of symptomatic illness and hastens the return to normal levels of activity when initiated promptly in patients with naturally acquired influenza. It therefore represents a useful therapeutic alternative to zanamivir (especially in patients who prefer oral administration or who have an underlying respiratory disorder) and the M2 inhibitors amantadine and rimantadine (because of its broader spectrum of anti-influenza activity and lower likelihood of resistance) in patients with influenza. In addition, although annual vaccination remains the best means of influenza prevention, there may be a place for oseltamivir in providing household prophylaxis or adjunctive prophylaxis in high-risk vaccinated patients during an outbreak of the disease or for use in patients in whom vaccination is unsuitable or ineffective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delavirdine, a bisheteroarylpiperazine derivative, is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that allosterically binds to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, inhibiting both the RNA- and DNA-directed DNA polymerase functions of the enzyme. Delavirdine in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) produced sustained reductions in plasma viral loads and improvements in immunological responses in large randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 48 to 54 weeks' duration. In patients with advanced HIV infection, triple therapy with delavirdine, zidovudine and lamivudine, didanosine or zalcitabine for 1 year significantly prolonged the time to virological failure compared with dual therapy (delavirdine plus zidovudine or 2 NRTIs; p < 0.0001). After 50 weeks' treatment, plasma HIV RNA levels were below the limit of detection (LOD; <50 copies/ml) for 40% of patients receiving triple therapy but for only 6% of those receiving dual NRTI therapy. Preliminary results suggest that delavirdine also has beneficial effects on surrogate markers as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple regimens. At 16 to 48 weeks, the minimum mean reduction in plasma viral load from baseline was 2.5 log10 copies/ml and mean CD4+ counts increased by 100 to 313 cells/microl. The proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNAlevels below the LOD (usually 200 to 500 copies/ml) ranged from 48 to 100% after > or = 16 weeks. Delavirdine was also effective as a component of saquinavir soft gel capsule-containing salvage regimens. Since delavirdine shares a common metabolic pathway (cytochrome P450 3A pathway) with other NNRTIs, HIV protease inhibitors and several drugs used to treat opportunistic infections in patients infected with HIV, the drug is associated with a number of pharmacokinetic interactions. Some of these drug interactions are clinically significant, necessitating dosage adjustments or avoidance of co-administration. Delavirdine is not recommended for use with lovastatin, simvastatin, rifabutin, rifampicin, sildenafil, ergot derivatives, quinidine, midazolam, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin. Importantly, the drug favourably increases the plasma concentration of several protease inhibitors. Delavirdine is generally well tolerated. Skin rash is the most frequently reported adverse effect, occurring in 18 to 50% of patients receiving delavirdine-containing combination therapy in clinical trials. Although a high proportion of patients developed a rash, it was typically mild to moderate in intensity, did not result in discontinuation or adjustment of treatment in most patients and resolved quickly. The occurrence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome was rare (1 case in 1,000 patients). A retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of liver toxicity, liver failure or noninfectious hepatitis between delavirdine-containing and non-delavirdine-containing antiretroviral treatment groups. In addition, the incidence of lipodystrophy, metabolic lipid disorders, hyperglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was not significantly different between these 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with NRTIs. delavirdine produces sustained improvements in surrogate markers of HIV disease and prolongs the time to virological failure in adult patients with HIV infection. Preliminary data of delavirdine as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens indicate that patients achieve marked improvements in virological and immunological markers. The drug is generally well tolerated, with a transient skin rash, typically of mild to moderate intensity, being the most common adverse effect. Delavirdine is an effective component of recommended antiretroviral treatment strategies for adult patients with HIV infection and, in combination with 2 NRTIs as a first-line therapy, the drug has the advantage of sparing protease inhibitors for subsequent use. Since delavirdine favourably increases plasma concentrations of several protease inhibitors, the drug may also be beneficial as a component of salvage therapy in combination with protease inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abacavir is a carbocyclic 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue. It is metabolised intracellularly to a 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue which competitively inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA chain extension. In double-blind trials in antiretroviral therapy-experienced or -naive patients, reductions in HIV RNA levels were greater and more prolonged in patients receiving abacavir in combination with other antiretroviral drugs than in those receiving placebo in combination with the same agents. Furthermore, abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine reduced viral load to below detectable levels in a proportion of patients, and to a similar extent to the protease inhibitor indinavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine. Greatest viral load reductions were seen in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. Preliminary results suggest that the viral suppression achieved with a protease inhibitor plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) can be maintained as effectively with abacavir in combination with 2 NRTIs as it can be by continuing the protease inhibitor-containing treatment regimen. Initial virological data from studies of combination regimens including abacavir and protease inhibitors appear promising but larger controlled trials are required to confirm these observations. Nausea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving abacavir-containing combination therapy. Adverse events tend to be reported most frequently soon after starting treatment; the majority of events are mild or moderate in intensity and transient. Other adverse events reported in >5% of patients include vomiting, malaise and fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, sleep disorders, cough, anorexia and rash. A major cause of abacavir treatment discontinuation is the development of a hypersensitivity reaction which has been reported in 3 to 5% of patients. The reaction usually occurs within 6 weeks of commencing treatment, shows evidence of multiorgan system involvement and typically includes fever and/or rash. Symptoms resolve rapidly after discontinuation of treatment. Continuing treatment or rechallenge can result in more severe symptoms, life-threatening hypotension and even death. CONCLUSION: Abacavir used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs effectively reduces viral load in both adults and children with HIV infection. Although these responses are greatest in individuals with little or no previous antiretroviral treatment, useful responses are still sometimes achieved in heavily pretreated individuals. Abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine provides a simple and convenient dosage regimen which is generally well tolerated, able to produce sustained suppression of viral replication and has the advantage of sparing other classes of antiretroviral drugs for subsequent use. This triple combination represents an alternative antiretroviral regimen for patients intolerant to protease inhibitors or those wishing to retain the option of protease inhibitors for later use. Further clinical studies are needed to define the activity of abacavir in combination with protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tramadol is a synthetic, centrally acting analgesic agent with 2 distinct, synergistic mechanisms of action, acting as both a weak opioid agonist and an inhibitor of monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake. The 2 enantiomers of racemic tramadol function in a complementary manner to enhance the analgesic efficacy and improve the tolerability profile of tramadol. In several comparative, well designed studies, oral and parenteral tramadol effectively relieved moderate to severe postoperative pain associated with surgery. Its overall analgesic efficacy was similar to that of morphine or alfentanil and superior to that of pentazocine. Tramadol provided effective analgesia in children and in adults for both inpatient and day surgery. Tramadol was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. The most common adverse events (incidence of 1.6 to 6.1%) were nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, sweating, vomiting and dry mouth. Importantly, unlike other opioids, tramadol has no clinically relevant effects on respiratory or cardiovascular parameters at recommended doses in adults or children. Tramadol also has a low potential for abuse or dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tramadol for the management of moderate to severe postoperative pain has been demonstrated in both inpatients and day surgery patients. Most importantly, unlike other opioids, tramadol has no clinically relevant effects on respiratory or cardiovascular parameters. Tramadol may prove particularly useful in patients with poor cardiopulmonary function, including the elderly, the obese and smokers, in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function, and in patients in whom nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not recommended or need to be used with caution. Parenteral or oral tramadol has proved to be an effective and well tolerated analgesic agent in the perioperative setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aspirations are comprised of two major components--inspiration and ambition. Ambitions represents the ability to look ahead and invest in the future. Inspiration can be described as the ability to invest the time, energy, and effort to reach those ambitions. Variables such as how and why students spend their time illustrate the dynamics of these two components. The data in this report are based on the responses to the Aspirations Survey of 2,677 eighth- to twelfth-grade students from seven rural schools in Maine. The data suggest that many students have no understanding of why they engage in certain activities. If students are to be responsible for their education and more importantly for themselves, they must see purpose in their pursuits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the human brain to operate, populations of neurons across anatomical structures must coordinate their activity within milliseconds. To date, our understanding of such interactions has remained limited. We recorded directly from the hippocampus (HPC), posteromedial cortex (PMC), ventromedial/orbital prefrontal cortex (OFC), and the anterior nuclei of the thalamus (ANT) during two experiments of autobiographical memory processing that are known from decades of neuroimaging work to coactivate these regions. In 31 patients implanted with intracranial electrodes, we found that the presentation of memory retrieval cues elicited a significant increase of low frequency (LF < 6 Hz) activity followed by cross-regional phase coherence of this LF activity before select populations of neurons within each of the four regions increased high-frequency (HF > 70 Hz) activity. The power of HF activity was modulated by memory content, and its onset followed a specific temporal order of ANT→HPC/PMC→OFC. Further, we probed cross-regional causal effective interactions with repeated electrical pulses and found that HPC stimulations cause the greatest increase in LF-phase coherence across all regions, whereas the stimulation of any region caused the greatest LF-phase coherence between that particular region and ANT. These observations support the role of the ANT in gating, and the HPC in synchronizing, the activity of cortical midline structures when humans retrieve self-relevant memories of their past. Our findings offer a fresh perspective, with high temporal fidelity, about the dynamic signaling and underlying causal connections among distant regions when the brain is actively involved in retrieving self-referential memories from the past., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.

College and university campuses with a notable arboreal component provide unique opportunities for carrying out ecological research. The University of West Florida Campus Ecosystem Study (UWF CES) was established in 2019 as interconnected research to take advantage of the extensive arborescent nature of the UWF campus, particularly concerning longleaf pine (Pinus palustris). One of these investigations established permanent plots in forested sites of two contrasting types, one dominated by longleaf pine ("pine site") and the other dominated by hardwoods ('hardwood site'). This study used these plots to examine the influence of forest vegetation on light availability and soil processes. Light was measured as photosynthetically active radiation (and expressed as photon flux density-PFD) with a handheld meter in each plot. Soil was sampled to 5 cm in each plot; texture was measured with the hydrometer method. Identical sampling methods were carried out in a persistent canopy opening to assess light and soil conditions under maximum solar radiation. Mean PFD was ~4× higher in pine stands than in hardwood stands; PFD was 12.8 and 3.5% of full light in the pine and hardwood stands, respectively. All soils were dominated by coarse-textured sands, but silt was significantly higher in pine stand soil and higher still in the canopy opening. Among forest stand plots, sand was negatively related to PFD, whereas clay was positively related to PFD. Across the three sites, silt was positively related to PFD. These relationships are consistent with the importance of solar radiation as one of many drivers of soil weathering., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

To probe the causal importance of the human posteromedial cortex (PMC) in processing the sense of self, we studied a rare cohort of nine patients with electrodes implanted bilaterally in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, and retrosplenial regions with a combination of neuroimaging, intracranial recordings, and direct cortical stimulations. In all participants, the stimulation of specific sites within the anterior precuneus (aPCu) caused dissociative changes in physical and spatial domains. Using single-pulse electrical stimulations and neuroimaging, we present effective and resting-state connectivity of aPCu hot zone with the rest of the brain and show that they are located outside the boundaries of the default mode network (DMN) but connected reciprocally with it. We propose that the function of this subregion of the PMC is integral to a range of cognitive processes that require the self's physical point of reference, given its location within a spatial environment., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Classical psychedelics, including psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), are under investigation as potential therapeutic agents in psychiatry. Whereas most studies utilize relatively high doses, there are also reports of beneficial effects of "microdosing," or repeated use of very low doses of these drugs. The behavioral and neural effects of these low doses are not fully understood., Objectives: To examine the effects of LSD (13 μg and 26 μg) versus placebo on resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP) responses in healthy adults., Methods: Twenty-two healthy men and women, 18 to 35 years old, participated in 3 EEG sessions in which they received placebo or LSD (13 μg and 26 μg) under double-blind conditions. During each session, participants completed drug effect and mood questionnaires at hourly intervals, and physiological measures were recorded. During expected peak drug effect, EEG recordings were obtained, including resting-state neural oscillations in scalp electrodes over default mode network (DMN) regions and P300, N170, and P100 ERPs evoked during a visual oddball paradigm., Results: LSD dose-dependently reduced oscillatory power across delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands during both eyes closed and eyes open resting conditions. During the oddball task, LSD dose-dependently reduced ERP amplitudes for P300 and N170 components and increased P100 latency. LSD also produced dose-related increases in positive mood, elation, energy, and anxiety and increased heart rate and blood pressure. On a measure of altered states of consciousness, LSD dose-dependently increased Blissful State, but not other indices of perceptual or sensory effects typical of psychedelic drugs. The subjective effects of the drug were not correlated with the EEG measures., Conclusions: Low doses of LSD produced broadband cortical desynchronization over the DMN during resting state and reduced P300 and N170 amplitudes, patterns similar to those reported with higher doses of psychedelics. Notably, these neurophysiological effects raise the possibility that very low doses of LSD may produce subtle behavioral and perhaps therapeutic effects that do not rely on the full psychedelic experience., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Our ability to acquire, refine and adapt skilled limb movements is a hallmark of human motor learning that allows us to successfully perform many daily activities. The capacity to acquire, refine and adapt other features of motor performance, such as visual search, eye-hand coordination and visuomotor decisions, may also contribute to motor learning. However, the extent to which refinements of multiple behavioral features and their underlying neural processes independently contribute to motor learning remains unknown. In the current study, we used an ethological approach to test the hypothesis that practice-related refinements of multiple behavioral features would be independently predictive of motor learning., Methods: Eighteen healthy, young adults used an upper-limb robot with eye-tracking to practice six trials of a continuous, visuomotor task once a week for six consecutive weeks. Participants used virtual paddles to hit away 200 "Targets" and avoid hitting 100 "Distractors" that continuously moved towards them from the back of the workspace. Motor learning was inferred from trial-by-trial acquisition and week-by-week retention of improvements on two measures of task performance related to motor execution and motor inhibition. Adaptations involving underlying neural processes were inferred from trial-by-trial acquisition and week-by-week retention of refinements on measures of skilled limb movement, visual search, eye-hand coordination and visuomotor decisions. We tested our hypothesis by quantifying the extent to which refinements on measures of multiple behavioral features (predictors) were independently predictive of improvements on our two measures of task performance (outcomes) after removing all shared variance between predictors., Results: We found that refinements on measures of skilled limb movement, visual search and eye-hand coordination were independently predictive of improvements on our measure of task performance related to motor execution. In contrast, only refinements of eye-hand coordination were independently predictive of improvements on our measure of task performance related to motor inhibition., Conclusion: Our results provide indirect evidence that refinements involving multiple, neural processes may independently contribute to motor learning, and distinct neural processes may underlie improvements in task performance related to motor execution and motor inhibition. This also suggests that refinements involving multiple, neural processes may contribute to motor recovery after stroke, and rehabilitation interventions should be designed to produce refinements of all behavioral features that may contribute to motor recovery.

Background: Humans use voluntary eye movements to actively gather visual information during many activities of daily living, such as driving, walking, and preparing meals. Most stroke survivors have difficulties performing these functional motor tasks, and we recently demonstrated that stroke survivors who require many saccades (rapid eye movements) to plan reaching movements exhibit poor motor performance. However, the nature of this relationship remains unclear., Objective: Here we investigate if saccades interfere with speed and smoothness of reaching movements in stroke survivors, and if excessive saccades are associated with difficulties performing functional tasks., Methods: We used a robotic device and eye tracking to examine reaching and saccades in stroke survivors and age-matched controls who performed the Trail Making Test, a visuomotor task that uses organized patterns of saccades to plan reaching movements. We also used the Stroke Impact Scale to examine difficulties performing functional tasks., Results: Compared with controls, stroke survivors made many saccades during ongoing reaching movements, and most of these saccades closely preceded transient decreases in reaching speed. We also found that the number of saccades that stroke survivors made during ongoing reaching movements was strongly associated with slower reaching speed, decreased reaching smoothness, and greater difficulty performing functional tasks., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that poststroke interference between eye and limb movements may contribute to difficulties performing functional tasks. This suggests that interventions aimed at treating impaired organization of eye movements may improve functional recovery after stroke.

Successful execution of many motor skills relies on well-organized visual search (voluntary eye movements that actively scan the environment for task-relevant information). Although impairments of visual search that result from brain injuries are linked to diminished motor performance, the neural processes that guide visual search within this context remain largely unknown. The first objective of this study was to examine how visual search in healthy adults and stroke survivors is used to guide hand movements during the Trail Making Test (TMT), a neuropsychological task that is a strong predictor of visuomotor and cognitive deficits. Our second objective was to develop a novel computational model to investigate combinatorial interactions between three underlying processes of visual search (spatial planning, working memory, and peripheral visual processing). We predicted that stroke survivors would exhibit deficits in integrating the three underlying processes, resulting in deteriorated overall task performance. We found that normal TMT performance is associated with patterns of visual search that primarily rely on spatial planning and/or working memory (but not peripheral visual processing). Our computational model suggested that abnormal TMT performance following stroke is associated with impairments of visual search that are characterized by deficits integrating spatial planning and working memory. This innovative methodology provides a novel framework for studying how the neural processes underlying visual search interact combinatorially to guide motor performance., New & Noteworthy: Visual search has traditionally been studied in cognitive and perceptual paradigms, but little is known about how it contributes to visuomotor performance. We have developed a novel computational model to examine how three underlying processes of visual search (spatial planning, working memory, and peripheral visual processing) contribute to visual search during a visuomotor task. We show that deficits integrating spatial planning and working memory underlie abnormal performance in stroke survivors with frontoparietal damage., (Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.)

Background: Robotic and virtual-reality systems offer tremendous potential for improving assessment and rehabilitation of neurological disorders affecting the upper extremity. A key feature of these systems is that visual stimuli are often presented within the same workspace as the hands (i.e., peripersonal space). Integrating video-based remote eye tracking with robotic and virtual-reality systems can provide an additional tool for investigating how cognitive processes influence visuomotor learning and rehabilitation of the upper extremity. However, remote eye tracking systems typically compute ocular kinematics by assuming eye movements are made in a plane with constant depth (e.g. frontal plane). When visual stimuli are presented at variable depths (e.g. transverse plane), eye movements have a vergence component that may influence reliable detection of gaze events (fixations, smooth pursuits and saccades). To our knowledge, there are no available methods to classify gaze events in the transverse plane for monocular remote eye tracking systems. Here we present a geometrical method to compute ocular kinematics from a monocular remote eye tracking system when visual stimuli are presented in the transverse plane. We then use the obtained kinematics to compute velocity-based thresholds that allow us to accurately identify onsets and offsets of fixations, saccades and smooth pursuits. Finally, we validate our algorithm by comparing the gaze events computed by the algorithm with those obtained from the eye-tracking software and manual digitization., Results: Within the transverse plane, our algorithm reliably differentiates saccades from fixations (static visual stimuli) and smooth pursuits from saccades and fixations when visual stimuli are dynamic., Conclusions: The proposed methods provide advancements for examining eye movements in robotic and virtual-reality systems. Our methods can also be used with other video-based or tablet-based systems in which eye movements are performed in a peripersonal plane with variable depth.

Cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanorod arrays have been prepared via a novel templated electrodeposition process and were characterized for their photocatalytic behavior in nonaqueous photoelectrochemical cells. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanorod films serve as sacrificial templates for the in situ formation of polymer nanopore membranes on transparent conductive oxide substrates. Nitrocellulose and poly(lactic acid) are effective membrane-forming polymers that exhibit different modes of template formation, with nitrocellulose forming conformal coatings on the ZnO surface while poly(lactic acid) acts as an amorphous pore-filling material. Robust template formation is sensitive to the seeding method used to prepare the precursor ZnO nanorod films. Photoelectrochemical cells prepared from electrodeposited Cu2O films using methyl viologen as a redox shuttle in acetonitrile electrolyte exhibit significant charge recombination that can be partially suppressed by a combination of surface passivation methods. Surface-passivated nanostructured Cu2O films show enhanced photocurrent relative to planar electrodeposited Cu2O films of similar thickness. We have obtained the highest photocurrent ever reported for electrodeposited Cu2O in a nonaqueous photoelectrochemical cell.

Aripiprazole (ABILIFY(®)) is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is proposed to act via partial agonism of dopamine D2 receptors. Trials with oral aripiprazole have shown that, compared with some other atypical antipsychotics, aripiprazole is associated with fewer metabolic disturbances and has a favourable cardiovascular tolerability profile. Recently, an intramuscular long-acting injectable (LAI) depot formulation of aripiprazole (ABILIFY MAINTENA(®)) (aripiprazole LAI) has been approved for use as a treatment for schizophrenia in adults. The efficacy of aripiprazole LAI as a maintenance treatment for schizophrenia has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. In the trials, aripiprazole LAI was more effective than placebo, and noninferior to oral aripiprazole, in delaying relapse and in reducing relapse rates in schizophrenia. Aripiprazole LAI was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile consistent with that of oral aripiprazole. Thus, aripiprazole LAI is a valuable new treatment option for adult patients with schizophrenia. It may be of particular use for patients stable on oral aripiprazole who would prefer, or are likely to benefit from, a long-acting formulation.