Search

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to report the results of a survey conducted at Bharathidasan and Alagappa Universities to determine the research scholars' awareness, use of Open Access (OA) resources, reasons for using, impact of OA on the research scholars' research, satisfaction and problems faced.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, a self-assessed questionnaire was developed to collect data from the research scholars pursuing their research degrees from Bharathidasan and Alagappa Universities of Tamil Nadu, India. A total of 400 research scholars from various disciplines responded were used for analysis.FindingsThe results indicated that the majority of research scholars aware of few OA resources to a large extent and afraid to redistribute the sources as they fear of copyright issues. Easy to use, more informative and global research at one place were the major reasons for accessing the resources. The research scholars were aware of OA features and OA's impact such as freedom to use, modify, resources available with source code, reliability, self-archiving, quick publishing, more citations etc. Delay in downloading and lack of computer terminals to access the resources were the major issues faced by the research scholars. On the whole, the researchers are considering OA model as an alternative to business model and expect the university librarians to promote and enhance the accessibility of OA resources.Practical implicationsThe outcomes of the results will enable the librarians and authorities in universities to formulate appropriate decisions to remove the issues faced by the research scholars and develop a framework for new literacy instructions.Originality/valueThe study undertaken is new to the Indian continent and the Tami Nadu state in particular. The findings of the study will be useful to improve the awareness level and use of OA resources effectively.

Purpose This study aims to determine the level of knowledge in searching, evaluating, information management competency and to find differences among research scholars’ in terms of their information literacy (IL) competency with regards to gender and academic designation. Design/methodology/approach A survey method was conducted to collect the data from the research scholars’ pursuing their doctoral degrees in Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tamil Nadu, India. Findings The results of this study revealed that the majority have used simple search and were not using the Online Public Access Catalogue. They were not able to assess the information retrieved and the assistance from the library staff to locate the resources was found to be minimal. This study also highlighted some of the problems faced by the research scholars and provided some suggestions based on the findings. This study highlights the need to adopt a new IL framework and conduct user literacy training programmes for effective use of the resources. Practical implications This study also has practical implications in terms of assessing the IL competency among the research scholars and significant variations which identified through demographics and assessment of IL competency will enable policymakers to develop a framework for brand new literacy instructions. The results may help to frame long-term strategies to motivate and train the research scholars in the effective use of technologies for improving their academic performance. Originality/value This study used a questionnaire as tool to collect the data. The outcome of the results will help the librarians and authorities to discuss research scholars’ IL competency and take appropriate decisions to improve their IL skills.

Involvement of mitochondrial and nuclear gene mutations in the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been established well in various populations around the world. Previously, we have found the mitochondrial A>G transition at nucleotide position 3243 and 8296 in the T2D patients of Coimbatore population. This study is aimed to screen for the presence of various mitochondrial and nuclear DNA mutations in the T2D patients of Coimbatore to identify most prevalent mutation. This helps in identifying the susceptible individuals based on their clinical phenotype in future. Blood samples were collected from 150 unrelated late-onset T2D patients and 100 age-matched unrelated control samples according to World Health Organization criteria. Genotyping for the selected genes was done by polymerase chain reaction–single strand confirmation polymorphism, direct sequencing, and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism. The mitochondrial T>C transition at 8356 and nuclear-encoded GLUT1 gene mutation were found in the selected T2D patients. The T8356C mutation was found in two patients (1.3%), and the clinical characteristics were found to be similar in both the patients whereas GLUT1 gene mutation was found in seven patients. Four out of seven patients showed homozygous (−) genotype and three patients showed heterozygous (±) genotype for the mutant allele XbaI. Among these three patients, one patient was found to have elevated level of urea and creatinine with the history of kidney dysfunction and chronic T2D. Our results suggest that the T8356C and GLUT1 gene mutations may have an important role in developing late-onset T2D in Coimbatore population. Particularly, individuals with GLUT1 gene may develop kidney dysfunction at their later age.

In the original article the author group displayed was the following: Vijaya Padma Viswanadha, Anitha Shobana, Santhini Elango, Pradeepa Duraisamy, Tresa Dominic, Ganesan Perumal, Ishwarya Periasamy and Balakrishnan Ramanathan. However the name of the last named author Balakrishnan Ramanathan is not correct. The correct name should read Balamurugan Ramanathan or Balamurugan R. Everything else in the paper remains correct.