Search

Deceased donor organs for transplantation are costly. Expenses include donor assessment, pre-operative care of acceptable donors, surgical organ recovery, preservation and transport, and other costs. US Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) serve defined geographic areas in which each OPO has exclusive organ recovery responsibilities including detailed reporting of costs. We sought to determine the costs of procuring deceased donor livers by examining reported organ acquisition costs from OPO cost reports. Using 6 years of US OPO cost report data for each OPO (2013-2018), we determined the average cost of recovering a viable (i.e., transplanted) liver for each of the 51 independent US OPOs. We examined predictors of these costs including the number of livers procured, the percent of nonviable livers, direct procurement costs, coordinator salaries, professional education, and local cost of living. A cost curve estimated the relationship between the cost of livers and the number of locally procured livers. The average cost of procured livers by individual OPO-year varied widely from $11 393 to $65 556 (average $31 659) over the six study years. An increase in the overall number of procured livers was associated with lower direct costs, administrative, and procurement overhead costs, but this association differed for imported livers. Cost per local liver decreased linearly for each additional liver, while importing more livers was only cost saving until 200 livers, with imported livers costing more ($39K vs. $31.7K). The largest predictor of variation in cost was the aggregate of direct costs (e.g., hospital costs) to recover the organ (57%). Cost increases were 2.5% per year (+$766/year). This information may be valuable in determining how OPOs might improve service to transplant centers and the patients they serve., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Peters directs DCI Donor Services Research Fund and is a consultant for the Kidney Transplant Collaborative. Ms. Gershun is a Special Advisor to the Kidney Transplant Collaborative. The opinions expressed in this manuscript reflect those of the authors and not the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to show how the US government could save approximately 47 000 patients with chronic kidney failure each year from suffering on dialysis and premature death by compensating living kidney donors enough to completely end the kidney shortage., Methods: Supply and demand analysis was used to estimate the number of donated kidneys needed to end the kidney shortage and the level of compensation required to encourage this number of donations. These results were then input into a detailed cost-benefit analysis to estimate the economic value of kidney transplantation to (1) the average kidney recipient and their caregiver, (2) taxpayers, and (3) society in general., Results: We estimate half of patients diagnosed with kidney failure each year-approximately 62 000 patients-could be saved from suffering on dialysis and premature death if they could receive an average of 1½ kidney transplants. However, currently there are only enough donated kidneys to save approximately 15 000 patients. To encourage sufficient donations to save the other 47 000 patients, the government would have to compensate living kidney donors approximately $77 000 (±50%) per donor. The value of transplantation to an average kidney recipient (and caregiver) would be approximately $1.5 million, and the savings from the recipient not needing expensive dialysis treatments would be approximately $1.2 million., Conclusions: This analysis reveals the huge benefit that compensating living kidney donors would provide to patients with kidney failure and their caregivers and, conversely, the huge cost that is being imposed on these patients and their families by the current legal prohibition against such compensation., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The goal is to provide a national analysis of organ procurement organization (OPO) costs., Methods: Five years of data, for 51 of the 58 OPOs (2013-2017, a near census) were obtained under a FOIA. OPOs are not-for-profit federal contractors with a geographic monopoly. A generalized 15-factor cost regression model was estimated with adjustments to precision of estimates (P) for repeated observations. Selected measures were validated by comparison to IRS forms., Results: Decease donor organ procurement is a $1B/y operation with over 26 000 transplants/y. Over 60% of the cost of an organ is overhead. Profits are $2.3M/OPO/y. Total assets are $45M/OPO and growing at 9%/y. "Tissue" (skin, bones) generates $2-3M profit/OPO/y. A comparison of the highest with the lower costing OPOs showed our model explained 75% of the cost difference. Comparing costs across OPOs showed that highest-cost OPOs are smaller, import 44% more kidneys, face 6% higher labor costs, report 98% higher compensation for support personnel, spend 46% more on professional education, have 44% fewer assets, compensate their Executive Director 36% less, and have a lower procurement performance (SDRR) score., Conclusions: Profits and assets suggest that OPOs are fiscally secure and OPO finances are not a source of the organ shortage. Asset accumulation ($45M/OPO) of incumbents suggests establishing a competitive market with new entrants is unlikely. Kidney-cost allocations support tissue procurements. Professional education spending does not reduce procurement costs. OPO importing of organs from other OPOs is a complex issue possibly increasing cost ($6K/kidney)., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To predict whether the COVID-19 pandemic and transplant center responses could have resulted in preventable deaths, we analyzed registry information of the US end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient population awaiting kidney transplantation. Data were from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the United States Renal Data System. Based on 2019 OPTN reports, annualized reduction in kidney transplantation of 25%-100% could result in excess deaths of wait-listed (deceased donor) transplant candidates from 84 to 337 and living donor candidate excess deaths from 35 to 141 (total 119-478 potentially preventable deaths of transplant candidates). Changes in transplant activity due to COVID-19 varied with some centers shutting down while others simply heeded known or suspected pandemic risks. Understanding potential excess mortality for ESRD transplant candidates when circumstances compel curtailment of transplant activity may inform policy and procedural aspects of organ transplant systems allowing ways to best inform patients and families as to potential risks in shuttering organ transplant activity. Considering that more than 700 000 Americans have ESRD with 100 000 awaiting a kidney transplant, our highest annual estimate of 478 excess total deaths from postponing kidney transplantation seems modest., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Government compensation of kidney donors would likely increase the supply of kidneys and prevent the premature deaths of tens of thousands of patients with kidney failure each year. The major argument against it is that it would exploit the poor who would be more likely to accept the offers of compensation. This overlooks the fact that many poor patients desperately need a kidney transplant and would greatly benefit from an increased supply of kidneys. The objective of this study is to empirically test the hypothesis that government compensation of kidney donors would exploit the poor. Exploitation is defined by economists and several noted ethicists as paying donors less than the fair market value of their kidney. Exploitation is expressed in monetary terms and compared with the economic benefit recipients receive from a transplant. Data are from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the United States Renal Data System annual data reports. Educational attainment is used as a proxy for income. We estimate that if the government rewards living donors with a package of non-cash benefits worth $75,000 per kidney, donors would not be exploited. Much more important, this compensation would likely end the kidney shortage, enabling many more patients with kidney failure to obtain transplants and live longer and healthier lives. The value of kidney transplantation to a U.S. recipient is about $1,330,000, which is an order of magnitude greater than any purported exploitation of a living donor (zero to $75,000). Consequently, the aggregate net benefit to the poor alone from kidney transplantation would increase to about $12 billion per year from $1 billion per year currently. Most of the benefit would accrue to poor kidney recipients. But poor donors would receive the fair market value of their kidney, and hence would not be exploited. If the government wanted to ensure that donors also received a net benefit, it could easily do so by increasing the compensation above $75,000 per donor., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Importance: Patients in the United States waiting for kidney transplantation die in increasing numbers owing to the severe kidney shortage, which might be alleviated by compensating living kidney donors., Objective: To determine the willingness of voting US citizens to become living kidney donors and to ascertain the potential influence of compensation for donation., Design, Setting, and Participants: A professionally designed quantitative survey was administered by an international polling firm in June 2014. Information was collected on willingness to donate a kidney and the potential influence of compensation ($50 000); survey data included respondent age, income, education level, sex, US region, race/ethnicity, marital status, political affiliation, likelihood to vote, and employment status. The survey was performed via a random-digit dialing process that selected respondents via both landlines and mobile telephones to improve population representation. The survey included 1011 registered US voters likely to vote., Main Outcomes and Measures: The degree to which the US voting public is willing to donate a kidney and the perceptions of current voters toward paying living kidney donors., Results: Of the 1011 respondents, 427 were male and 584 were female, with 43% of participants between ages 45 and 64 years. With respondents grouped by willingness to donate, we found that 689 (68%) would donate a kidney to anyone and 235 (23%) only to certain persons; 87 (9%) would not donate. Most (59%) indicated that payment of $50 000 would make them even more likely to donate a kidney, 32% were unmoved by compensation, and 9% were negatively influenced by payment., Conclusions and Relevance: Most US voters view living kidney donation positively, and most would be motivated toward donor nephrectomy if offered a payment of $50 000. Because most registered voters favor such payments, and because thousands of lives might be saved should compensation increase the number of transplantable kidneys, laws and regulations prohibiting donor compensation should be modified to allow pilot studies of financial incentives for living kidney donors. Outcomes of such trials could then result in evidence-based policies, which would incorporate fair and just compensation to those persons willing to undergo donor nephrectomy.

In 2006, a survey from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons disclosed significant and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events in live donor nephrectomies (LDN) related to failure of clips, leading to the contraindication of the Weck® Hem-o-lok® clip for control of the renal artery during LDN. A survey regarding vascular control techniques, their perceived safety ratings and their failures was sent to 645 European Society for Organ Transplantation members who profiled their profession as "surgeon" and selected "kidney" as organ type. Two hundred forty-three (41%) members responded, of whom 171 (63.3%) independently perform LDN. Their responses were analyzed. For arterial and venous vascular control, the GIA™ and TA™stapler are used most frequently, and were rated the safest. Of the 121 reported hemorrhagic events, slippage and dislodgement of clips occurred at least 58 times, while stapler malfunction occurred at least 40 times. One donor death from hemorrhage related to clip dysfunction was reported. Hemorrhagic complications of LDN with fatal and non-fatal outcomes still occur. Strikingly, many surgeons do not use the vascular closing technique that they consider most safe. Failure of non-transfixion techniques is associated with greater risks for the donor. Control of major vessels in LDN must employ transfixion techniques for optimal donor safety., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: Only 29% of deceased donor kidney recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) receive HCV-positive (HCV+) kidneys. These kidneys are discarded 2.5 times more often than their HCV-negative (HCV-) counterparts, possibly due to the sense that an HCV+ kidney may adversely affect recipient liver function. The goals of this study were to characterize liver disease in HCV+ kidney recipients and compare rates of liver-related outcomes by kidney donor HCV status., Study Design: Observational cohort study., Setting & Participants: 6,250 patients with HCV who had a kidney transplant in 1995-2008 as captured in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Liver-related outcomes were assessed by cross-linking with the liver waitlist and transplant data sets., Predictor: HCV status of transplanted kidney., Outcomes: Joining the liver waitlist, receiving a liver transplant, death., Measurements: Time to event., Results: Only 63 (1%) of HCV+ kidney recipients eventually joined the liver waitlist during the 13-year study period. Those who received HCV+ kidneys had a 2.6-fold higher hazard of joining the liver list (P < 0.001); however, the absolute difference in rate of listing between recipients of HCV- and HCV+ kidneys was <2%. This is consistent with findings of only 2% lower patient survival at 3 years in HCV+ patients receiving HCV+ versus HCV- kidneys., Limitations: We lacked data for HCV viral load and genotype of both HCV+ recipients and transplanted HCV+ kidneys., Conclusions: Because transplant with an HCV+ kidney may reduce waiting-time by more than a year for an HCV+ patient and there is a high risk of kidney waitlist mortality, a 2% increased rate of adverse liver outcomes and 2% increased rate of death at 3 years should not universally preclude the use of HCV+ kidneys when the intended recipient is also HCV+., (Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hemorrhagic deaths of living kidney donors from failure of vascular clips used on the renal artery, first documented in 2006, have continued due to postoperative Hem-o-lok clip failure with sudden, massive bleeding. While the FDA issued a Class II recall of the Hem-o-lok clip for laparoscopic donor nephrectomies in 2006, two live kidney donors in the United States and one in India have since died. Compliance in timely reporting of deaths by the manufacturer and donor hospitals has not been enforced. Oversight agencies did not inform practitioners that donors died due to clip failures. A February 2011 survey disclosed that Hem-o-lok or other clips are still used by some surgeons as a sole means of arterial control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; thus, a practice with documented fatal outcomes persists. We conclude that systems failures by oversight-regulatory agencies in communication to active clinicians led, at least in part, to preventable deaths. Information which was disseminated was neither complete nor timely. A corrective plan, funded by oversight agencies and the Hem-o-lok manufacturer, is proposed. All surgeons operating on a living organ donor must select vascular control techniques that entail tissue transfixion and assure a safe operative recovery. The Hem-o-lok and other surgical clips must not be used to control the donor renal artery., (© Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Incentives for organ donation, currently prohibited in most countries, may increase donation and save lives. Discussion of incentives has focused on two areas: (1) whether or not there are ethical principles that justify the current prohibition and (2) whether incentives would do more good than harm. We herein address the second concern and propose for discussion standards and guidelines for an acceptable system of incentives for donation. We believe that if systems based on these guidelines were developed, harms would be no greater than those to today's conventional donors. Ultimately, until there are trials of incentives, the question of benefits and harms cannot be satisfactorily answered., (© 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background and Objectives: This study was undertaken by the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP) to better understand ESRD patients' satisfaction with their current renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the education they received before initiating therapy., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In addition to an open invitation on the AAKP website, nearly 9000 ESRD patients received invitations to complete the survey, which consisted of 46 questions. Satisfaction was measured on a 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied) scale., Results: Survey respondents were younger, more highly educated, and more likely to be white as well as employed as compared with the U.S. dialysis population. A total of 977 patients responded. Overall patient satisfaction with current RRT treatment varied from a low of 4.5 for in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) to a high of 6.1 in transplant (TX) patients. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) mean scores were 5.2 and 5.5, respectively. PD, HHD, and TX patients' satisfaction scores were significantly higher than those of ICHD patients (P < 0.05). Approximately 31% of respondents felt that the therapies were not equally and fairly presented as treatment options, and 32% responded that they were not educated regarding HHD., Conclusions: ESRD patients are not uniformly advised about all possible treatment methods and hence were only moderately satisfied with their pretreatment education. Once on RRT, those on a home therapy or with a kidney TX are more satisfied than those with ICHD.

Objective: After anecdotal reports of severe hemorrhage from failure of surgical clips to sustain closure of renal artery stumps in live donor nephrectomies were received, this study was designed to identify specific surgical techniques that are associated with an increased risk of failure to control bleeding and might represent opportunities to improve patient safety., Background: Preventing complications for living kidney donors must be paramount in addressing end-stage renal failure through living kidney donation. Major hemorrhage from technical failure, albeit an infrequent occurrence, can cause significant, yet preventable, morbidity or death. Open and laparoscopic approaches to living kidney donation use several vascular control methods, some of which may be more prone to failure and life-endangering hemorrhage than others., Methods: To define hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation, a survey was sent to all 893 surgeon-members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to ascertain study participant characteristics, most frequently used vascular control techniques, and incidence of events (death, transfusion, reexploration or conversion to open nephrectomy, or contralateral [remaining kidney] renal failure). Outcomes of hemorrhage and comments by respondents were sought as were data from other sources., Results: In 213 surveys returned (24%), 66 and 39 episodes of arterial and venous hemorrhage were reported, respectively. Among arterial control problems, 2 resulted in donor death and 2 resulted in renal failure; 19 episodes required transfusion. Open conversions in laparoscopic nephrectomy or late reoperations for hemorrhage were reported for 29 cases. Locking and standard clips applied to the renal artery were associated with the greatest risks., Conclusions: Significant hemorrhagic complications occur with living kidney donation in both open and laparoscopic approaches. Loss of arterial control jeopardizes donor life and health, especially when it occurs in the postoperative period. Vascular transfixion provides the best vascular control of major vessels.

Whether transplantation of deceased donor kidney allografts from donors with antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV) confers a survival advantage compared with remaining on the kidney transplant waiting list is not yet known. We studied 38,270 USRDS Medicare beneficiaries awaiting kidney transplantation who presented with end-stage renal disease from April 1, 1995 to July 31, 2000. Cox regression was used to compare the adjusted hazard ratios for death among recipients of kidneys from deceased donors, and donors with antibodies against hepatitis C (DHCV+), controlling for demographics and comorbidities. In comparison to staying on the waiting list, transplantation from DHCV+ was associated with improved survival among all patients (adjusted hazard ratio for death 0.76, 95% CI 0.60, 0.96). Of patients receiving DHCV+ kidneys, 52% were themselves hepatitis C antibody positive (HCV+), so outcomes associated with use of these grafts may have particular implications for HCV+ transplant candidates. Recommendations for use of DHCV+ kidneys may require analysis of data not currently collected from either dialysis or transplant patients. However, transplantation of DHCV+ kidneys is associated with improved patient survival compared to remaining wait-listed and dialysis dependent.

Background: A two-part study was initiated to compare kidney transplant patient and transplant professional perceptions regarding immunosuppression-related physical changes and their impact on transplant recipients., Methods: Parallel surveys were developed and administered to transplant patients and active transplant clinicians., Results: Eighty percent of surveyed patients reported immunosuppression-induced hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, acne, alopecia, or cushingoid facies. Hirsutism (94%) and gingival hyperplasia (51%) occurred more frequently in cyclosporine patients (p < 0.01); alopecia (30%) occurred more frequently in tacrolimus patients (p < 0.01). Patient reported incidence of physical changes significantly exceeded observations by professionals for every condition (p < 0.01), however 84.4% of affected patients reported feeling "happy to endure" changes "for the sake of having a transplant." Patients also reported emotional and social effects due to physical changes, an outcome underestimated by transplant professionals (p < 0.01). Patients and professionals communicated about physical changes; however, more than half of affected patients believed communication occurred "rarely/never" while over half of the professionals believed communication occurred "every visit/most of the time." Although most physicians believed changes could be addressed, doctors recommended treatment for less than half of the affected patients. When recommended therapy changes were pursued, treatments were effective in the majority of cases., Conclusions: Incidence of immunosuppression-related physical changes is high and somewhat dependent on drug regimen. Although patients seem willing to accept cosmetic changes for the sake of having a transplant, physical changes have a psychosocial impact that is underestimated by clinicians. Immunosuppression-related physical changes remain underaddressed; effective interventions offer opportunities for improved care.

Background: Although urinary tract infection (UTI) occurring late after renal transplantation has been considered "benign," this has not been confirmed in a national population of renal transplant recipients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 28,942 Medicare primary renal transplant recipients in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database from January 1, 1996, through July 31, 2000, assessing Medicare claims for UTI occurring later than 6 months after transplantation based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), codes and using Cox regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for time to death and graft loss (censored for death), respectively., Results: The cumulative incidence of UTI during the first 6 months after renal transplantation was 17% (equivalent for both men and women), and at 3 years was 60% for women and 47% for men (P < 0.001 in Cox regression analysis). Late UTI was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent death in Cox regression analysis (P < 0.001; AHR, 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22, 3.85); and AHR for graft loss was 1.85 (95% CI, 1.29, 2.64). The association of UTI with death persisted after adjusting for cardiac and other infectious complications, and regardless of whether UTI was assessed as a composite of outpatient/inpatient claims, primary hospitalized UTI, or solely outpatient UTI., Conclusion: Whether due to a direct effect or as a marker for serious underlying illness, UTI occurring late after renal transplantation, as coded by clinicians in the United States, does not portend a benign outcome.

Analysis of the USRDS kidney transplant registry disclosed that use of hepatitis C virus-positive donor (DHCV+) kidneys was an independent risk factor for patient death after kidney transplantation when compared to use of DHCV- kidneys, and that death in recipients of DCHV+ kidneys occurred earlier than previously reported. This increased risk of death was delayed for about 2 years, suggesting the development of an intermediate complication that resulted in a later increased risk of death. While liver disease early after transplant in these patients was rare, new-onset diabetes mellitus occurred early and commonly, suggesting this complication as a prominent mediator of mortality associated with transplantation with DHCV+ kidneys. Identification of new-onset diabetes mellitus may represent a new target of opportunity to improve outcomes associated with use of DHCV+ kidneys. Even under the current circumstances, use of DHCV+ kidneys was also independently associated with a survival experience that, although less favorable than associated with transplantation of DHCV- kidneys, was significantly better than remaining on the kidney transplant waiting list. Whether this survival advantage applies to all relevant subgroups could not be assessed and warrants further study. Our analyses suggest opportunities to improve survival and reduce morbidity after use of DHCV+ kidneys.

Kidneys from donors who are positive for hepatitis C virus (DHCV+) have recently been identified as an independent risk factor for mortality after renal transplantation. However, it has not been determined whether risk persists after adjustment for baseline cardiac comorbidity or applies in the era of modern immunosuppression. Therefore, a historical cohort study was conducted of US adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients from January 1, 1996, to May 31, 2001; followed until October 31, 2001. A total of 36,956 patients had valid donor and recipient HCV serology. Cox regression analysis was used to model adjusted hazard ratios for mortality and graft loss, respectively, adjusted for other factors, including comorbid conditions from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Studies Form 2728 and previous dialysis access-related complications. It was found that DHCV+ was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.87; P < 0.001), primarily as a result of infection. Mycophenolate mofetil was associated with improved survival in DHCV+ patients, primarily related to fewer infectious deaths. Adjusted analyses limited to recipients who were HCV+, HCV negative, or age 65 and over, or by use of mycophenolate mofetil confirmed that DHCV+ was independently associated with mortality in each subgroup. It is concluded that DHCV+ is independently associated with an increased risk of mortality after renal transplantation adjusted for baseline comorbid conditions in all subgroups. Recipients of DHCV+ organs should be considered at high risk for excessive immunosuppression.

The impact of hepatitis C virus-positive donor kidneys on patient survival has not been analyzed in a national study. This study analyzed 20,111 adult (age, > or =16 yr) recipients having solitary cadaveric kidney transplants from adult donors with valid donor hepatitis C serologies from July 1, 1994, to June 30, 1998, in an historical cohort study (the 2000 United States Kidney Data System) of patient survival. Analysis was by the Cox proportional hazards models, which corrected for characteristics thought to affect outcomes. Of 484 kidneys positive for hepatitis C virus serology, 165 (34%) were given to recipients with confirmed negative hepatitis C serologies. Unadjusted 3-yr patient survival was 93% in all recipients of donor hepatitis C-negative kidneys versus 85% in all recipients of donor hepatitis C-positive kidneys (P = 0.01). Among hepatitis C-positive recipients, those who received hepatitis C-positive kidneys had worse survival than recipients of hepatitis C-negative kidneys. Among elderly hepatitis C-negative recipients, those who received hepatitis C-positive kidneys also had worse survival; in fact, all recipients of donor hepatitis C-positive kidneys had increased risk of mortality (P = 0.028). There were no significant interactions between donor hepatitis C positivity and either recipient hepatitis C positivity or older recipient age. The use of hepatitis C-positive kidneys in recipients who were hepatitis C-negative was fairly common and contrary to some current recommendations. Recipients of donor hepatitis C-positive kidneys were at independently increased risk of mortality, with no evidence that any subgroups were less affected.

To identify education, pay, and job responsibilities, an informal 19-item survey was sent to 1661 transplant coordinators; 424 (26%) were returned. Respondents worked in all phases of transplantation. Education levels varied widely; most respondents had some formal nursing education. Full-time salaries were from $25,000 to $110,000 per year; 67% worked 40 to 50 hours and 19% worked more than 50 hours per week. Of 402 clinical coordinators, 280 (70%) took call, and 122 (30%) did not. Call frequency varied with rotations every second, third, and fourth week; 44% of those taking call did not receive additional on-call pay. Nurse-managed clinics (with physician availability) were the predominant workplace for clinical coordinators. Autonomy and contact with patients were the most liked aspects of the job, and the least-liked aspects were on-call status and paper-work. Increased salary and added support staff ranked top among desired changes in the job. Transplant coordinators appear to be committed professionals who are critical to all endeavors in organ transplantation.

Background: The success of kidney transplantation from a genetically unrelated living spouse or friend has influenced transplant physicians to consider the requests of individuals wishing to volunteer to be a kidney donor who have no intended recipient specified. Representatives of the transplant community gathered in Boston, MA, on May 31, 2001, to deliberate on the experience of live kidney donation from such volunteers, currently termed nondirected donors (NDD)., Objective of Conference Participants: The objective of the conference was to recommend ethical and practice guidelines for health care professionals considering the transplantation of a kidney from a live NDD., Conference Participants: This conference was convened under the sponsorship of The National Kidney Foundation, with representation from The American Society of Transplantation and The American Society of Transplant Surgeons, The American Society of Nephrology, The United Resource Networks, The United Network for Organ Sharing, The Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, The National Institutes of Health, and The Division of Transplantation of the Health Resources and Services Administration (see Appendix)., Conference Report: The suggested content of screening interviews, which provide information regarding the donation process, elicits pertinent medical and psychosocial history, and assesses NDD motivation are presented in this report. Approaches to identifying the center that would evaluate the suitability of the NDD, to performing the kidney recovery, and to selecting the NDD recipient are also proposed. Other ethical issues such as the use of prisoners as an NDD, compensation for the NDD, media involvement, and communication between the NDD and recipient are discussed., Conclusion: The willingness of health care professionals to consider NDD volunteers is driven by the compelling need to provide organs for an ever-expanding list of patients awaiting a kidney transplant. However, the psychological impact and emotional reward of donation has yet to be determined for NDD who may not have any relationship to the recipient or knowledge of the recipient's outcome. Transplant centers that accept NDD should document an informed consent process that details donor risks, assures donor safety, and determines that the goals and expectations of the NDD and the recipient can be realized.

In order to define current issues and outcomes of living kidney donation, 100 consecutive living donors operated on between July 1996 and March 2001 were evaluated. The 64 women and 36 men ranged in age from 19 to 72 yr (mean 42.5 yr), and 65 were related to the recipient while 35 were unrelated donors. Hospital admission the morning of surgery and use of a minimal open approach to the donor kidney were standard, as were post-operative epidural pain control and plans for short hospital stay. The 100 donors were hospitalized for 2 (25), 3 (48), 4 (18), 5 (8), or 6 (1) days, with an average length of stay of 3.12 d (range 2-6 d). The mean charge for kidney donor hospitalization was 14,470 dollars (range 9671-22,808 dollars). There were no major intra or immediate post-operative complications. Six rehospitalizations occurred for post-donation nausea, vomiting, dehydration (n = 2); spinal headache; pneumonia and wound haematoma; and late wound reexploration (one hernia and one nerve entrapment). All donors returned to pre-operative functional status within 6 d to 6 wk of donation. All kidneys functioned immediately in the 100 recipients (50 women, 50 men) who averaged 46.6 yr of age (range 17-69 yr); recipient length of stay averaged 3.81 d (range 2-15 d). All donors survived in excellent health; recipient graft and patient survival, respectively, are 87 and 90% through the entire 5-yr period. Excellent long-term outcomes for living kidney donors may be accomplished using minimal open surgical technique, post-operative epidural pain control and plans for a brief hospitalization. Expansion of living donor resources in renal transplant programs may grow as unrelated kidney donation and non-directed donation as well as minimally invasive (open and laparoscopic) techniques evolve.

Previous studies of the effect of donor factors on renal transplant outcomes have not tested the role of recipient body mass index, donor/recipient weight ratios and age matching, and other factors. We analyzed 20,309 adult (age 16 or older) recipients having solitary cadaveric renal transplants from adult donors from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1998 in an historical cohort study (the 2000 United States Renal Data System) of death censored graft loss by the Cox proportional hazards models, which corrected for characteristics thought to affect outcomes. The only independently significant findings in Cox Regression analysis were a high donor/ recipient age ratio (> or = 1.10, e.g. a 55-year-old donor given to a recipient age 50years or younger, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-4.39) and African American donor kidneys (AHR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.24-2.17). African American recipients and older donors were not at independently increased risk of graft failure in this model. Among donor factors, older donor kidneys given to younger recipients and donor African American kidneys were independently associated with graft loss in recipients of cadaver kidneys. The task for the transplant community should be to find the best means for managing all donor organs without discouraging organ donation.

This study assessed the applicability of two important components of the transtheoretical model of behavior change (TTM) to family consent for cadaveric organ donation. Men and women (N = 169), who consented or refused to donate the organs of a family member, completed a telephone survey reflecting the stage of change and decisional balance constructs. Psychometric analyses resulted in a two-factor decisional balance scale: a seven-item scale representing negative perceptions of consent (cons), and a seven-item scale representing positive perceptions of consent (pros). The pros and cons were significantly associated with stage of readiness for donation consent and with the family consent decision. Research utilizing this measure has the potential to enhance intervention programs to increase donation consent rates.

Rates of and risk factors for graft loss and graft loss resulting from recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have not been studied in a national population. A retrospective analysis was performed on a national registry (1999 United States Renal Data System) of 101,808 renal transplant recipients (October 1, 1987, to December 31, 1996). Of these, 3,861 recipients of solitary renal transplants who had end-stage renal disease resulting from FSGS met inclusion criteria. Outcomes were graft loss and graft loss resulting from recurrent FSGS. As a percentage of all graft loss, recurrent FSGS accounted for 18.7% in living donor recipients and 7.8% in cadaveric recipients. In white recipients, the corresponding figures were 27% and 13%. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with graft loss resulting from recurrent FSGS were white recipient, donor African-American kidney in white recipient, younger recipient age, and treatment for rejection. African-American recipients had higher rates of graft loss overall. A living donor was associated with superior overall graft survival. Among renal transplant recipients with FSGS, white recipients had a higher risk of graft loss resulting from recurrent FSGS, disproportionately seen in recipients of African-American kidneys. The role of donor/recipient race pairing on graft loss resulting from recurrent FSGS should be validated. Living donor had no association with graft loss from recurrent FSGS after correction for other factors. African-American recipients with FSGS may have the most to gain from a living donor, given their improved graft survival and decreased risk of graft loss resulting from recurrent FSGS. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

To determine donor nephrectomy outcomes, a one page 20-item survey of 42 cases was reviewed, including demographics, intervals to normal activities (e.g., driving a car, returning to work), and an open inquiry about the donation process. Hospital records were also reviewed. Nephrectomy under general anesthesia was through an anterior flank, extra-retroperitoneal approach with postoperative epidural pain control. Early self-care, progressive ambulation, and prescriptive pulmonary care were undertaken to facilitate recovery. Length of stay averaged 3.4 (range 2-8) d, and mean hospitalization charge was $15 169 (range $10 733-S29 579). Thirty-four donors were employed outside the home; 18 (53%) returned to work within 4 wk, and the average duration away from work was 4.6 wk (range 6 d 10 wk). Within 2 wk, 25 (59%) were driving an automobile. Usual activities of daily living were fully performed by all donors at a mean of 4.8 wk (minimum 5 d). Forty respondents would donate again, and one might; one did not respond to this question. None reported intermediate or long-term disabilities and all reported return to their pre-donation level of activity. With the anterior extra-retroperitoneal nephrectomy, most donors were out of the hospital within 4 d, were driving within 2 wk, and returned to gainful employment within 4 wk. Living kidney donation, as viewed by the donors, was a positive experience, which appeared to disrupt their lives minimally.

Of 133 consecutive renal transplants, 61 (46%) were living donor grafts recovered in an anterior-retroperitoneal approach. Donor demographics, operative-anesthetic care, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and complications were reviewed with donor and recipient follow-up of 4 to 40 months. Donors included 35 women and 26 men, ages 22 to 61 years (mean, 42.2); thirty-nine were living related and 22 were living unrelated donors. Pretransplant evaluation defined renal anatomy and function (minimal creatinine clearance, 75 cc/minute). Hospital admission occurred the morning of donation. Nephrectomy by the anterior-retroperitoneal approach (no rib resection) was followed by postoperative epidural pain control, early resumption of diet, progressive ambulation, and aggressive pulmonary care. Operating room time door-to-door averaged 2 hours, 43 minutes (range, 1 hour, 45 minutes-3 hours, 55 minutes). Donors were hospitalized for 2 (n = 7), 3 (n = 24), 4 (n = 19), and 5 to 8 (n = 11) days (mean LOS, 3.75; range, 2-8 days). The mean charge for donor hospitalization was $15,329 (range, $10,808-$29,579). One donor required transfusion; another was readmitted for wound drainage and pneumonia treated medically. All donors remain well with normal renal function. One early graft loss (3 days) occurred from arterial intimal dissection; all others gained life-sustaining function. Recipient (98%) and graft (92%) survival was excellent at 4 to 40 months. Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy is safe and effective, permitting hospital LOS of usually <4 days, early recovery, and no lasting complications. Excellent donor and recipient results from this procedure should compel critical assessment of techniques requiring more extensive operative exposure or more costly operating room and hospital approaches to donor surgical management.

For 140 consecutive renal transplants performed from January 1995 to October 1997, 25 (18%) were from living-unrelated donors (15 women, 10 men, aged 25-63, mean 43 yr). All donors had pre-transplant imaging evaluation of renal anatomy following renal function assessment (minimal creatinine clearance 75 cm3/min). Admission to the hospital on the day of donation preceded nephrectomy under general anesthesia using an anterior flank, extra-retroperitoneal approach (no rib resection). Post-operative epidural pain control was used for all but 1 donor. The 25 kidney donors were hospitalized for 2 (n = 1), 3 (n = 12), 4 (n = 7), or 5-8 d (n = 5) (average 3.9 d) and had a mean hospitalization charge of $15,501 (range $10,808-$29,579). One intra-operative hemorrhage required transfusion; 1 late neural-related pain syndrome required outpatient wound exploration. Two kidneys were lost: a husband recipient from repetitive acute rejections at 3 months; a friend recipient from chronic rejection at 2.5 yr; both await cadaver transplant. The other 23 kidneys are functioning with a mean serum creatinine of 1.8 (range 1.0-3.3) at 3-36 months (patient survival 100%; graft survival 92%). While most donors were spouses (8 husbands and 10 wives), friends, distant cousins, in-laws, and adoptive relatives did well as donors and recipients. Transplantation may increase by 20% or more at centers which encourage broad application of living donor nephrectomy.

Background: Tacrolimus has been shown to have a less adverse effect on the lipid profiles of transplant patients when the drug is started as induction therapy. In order to determine the effect tacrolimus has on lipid profiles in stable cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients with established hyperlipidemia, a randomized prospective study was undertaken by the Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation., Methods: Patients of the 13 transplant centers, with cholesterol of 240 mg/dl or greater, who were at least 1 year posttransplant with stable renal function, were randomly assigned to remain on cyclosporine (control) or converted to tacrolimus. Patients converted to tacrolimus were maintained at a level of 5-15 ng/ml, and control patients remained at their previous levels of cyclosporine. Concurrent immunosuppressants were not changed. Levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, total high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low-density lipoprotein, and apoproteins A and B were monitored before conversion and at months 1, 3, and 6. Renal function and glucose control were evaluated at the beginning and end of the study (month 6)., Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled; 12 patients failed to complete the study. None were removed as a result of acute rejection or graft failure. Fifty-three patients were available for analysis (27 in the tacrolimus group and 26 controls). Demographics were not different between groups. In patients converted to tacrolimus treatment, there was a -55 mg/dl (-16%) (P=0.0031) change in cholesterol, a -48 mg/dl (-25%) (P=0.0014) change in LDL cholesterol, and a -36 mg/dl (-23%) (P=0.034) change in apolipoprotein B. There was no change in renal function, glycemic control, or incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus in the tacrolimus group., Conclusion: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus can be safely done after successful transplantation. Introduction of tacrolimus to a stable renal patient does not effect renal function or glycemic control. Tacrolimus can lower cholesterol, LDL, and apolipoprotein B. Conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine should be considered in the treatment of posttransplant hyperlipidemia.

Of 96 consecutive renal transplants in 2 years, 50 (52%) were living donor grafts. Donor demographics, treatment plans, length of stay (LOS), charges, and complications were reviewed. Donors included 27 women and 23 men aged 22 to 61 (mean 42.2) years; 33 were living related and 17 living unrelated donors. Racial distribution included 1 Hispanic, 2 Asian, 8 black, and 39 white donors. Pretransplant evaluation defined renal anatomy and function (minimal creatinine clearance 75 cc/min). Hospital admission occurred the morning of donation. Nephrectomy under general anesthesia entailed an anterior flank, extra-retroperitoneal approach (no rib resection); and postoperative epidural pain control was standard. Progressive early ambulation and pulmonary self-care optimized recovery. The 50 donors were hospitalized for 2 (n = 7), 3 (n = 18), 4 (n = 15), 5 (n = 6), and 6-8 (n = 4) days (mean LOS: 3.74 +/- 0.17, range 2-8 days). The mean charge for donor hospitalization was $15,415 +/- $397 (range $10,808-$29,579). One major intraoperative hemorrhage required transfusion; 1 patient was readmitted for wound drainage and pneumonia treated medically. While 40 of 50 patients (80%) were hospitalized for 4 days or less, there was no readmission because of short hospital stay. One early graft loss (3 days) occurred from technical problems; all others gained excellent life sustaining function. Three additional kidneys failed from rejection, noncompliance, and systemic coagulopathy. One recipient died at 8 months (CVA) with normal renal function. Current strategies for successful living kidney donation are thorough patient and family education, ambulatory preoperative testing, morning of surgery admission, and discharge planning beginning before hospitalization. Excellent outcomes may be accompanied by a brief LOS, epidural pain management, and liberal use of willing and healthy related and unrelated living donors.