Search

This study investigated nonacademic behavioral traits of medical technology students who were enrolled in two different types of medical technology programs. Subjects were drawn from two universities; the University of Utah and Brigham Young University. Subjects at each university were divided into two groups, one group consisting of those who had completed the traditional three-and-one program, and the other group consisting of those who had completed the new program which has a shortened clinical exposure and a lengthened classroom-laboratory experience. The data provided were statistically analyzed in the following manner. 1. The group of students from the University of Utah in the old three-and-one program were compared to the group of students from the University of Utah in the new integrated program using each of 13 behavioral characteristics. 2. The group of students from Brigham Young University in the old three-and-one program were compared to the group of students from Brigham Young University in the new integrated program using each of 13 behavioral characteristics. 3. All students from the University of Utah and Brigham Young University in the old three-and-one program were compared to all students from the University of Utah and Brigham Young University in the new integrated program using each of 13 behavioral characteristics. The results of these analyses indicated the following: 1. Regarding behavioral characteristics: a. Comparisons based on hospital staff ratings of University of Utah students revealed that on 6 of the 13 behavioral characteristics, students in the new program received significantly higher ratings than students in the old program. One characteristic rating approached significance, while 6 characteristics showed no difference. b. Comparisons based on hospital staff ratings of Brigham Young University students revealed that 1 of the 13 behavioral characteristics students in the new program received significantly higher ratings than students in the old program. One characteristic approached significance, while 9 characteristics revealed no differences. Two characteristics received higher ratings in favor of students in the old program. c. Comparisons based upon hospital staff ratings of all University of Utah and Brigham Young University students revealed that on 6 of the 13 behavioral characteristics, students in the new program received significantly higher ratings than students in the old programs. One characteristic approached significance, while 6 characteristics revealed no differences. 2. There were no differences in grade point averages (G.P.A.) and achievement scores (ACT) for University of Utah students old versus new, Brigham Young University students old versus new, and/or University of Utah versus Brigham Young University students.

International audience; Performance and usability of realworld speech-to-speech translation systems, like the one developed within the NESPOLE! project, are affected by several aspects that go beyong the pure translation quality provided by the underlying components of the system. In this paper we describe these aspects as perspectives along wich we have evaluated the NESPOLE! system. Four main issues are investigated (1) assessing system performance under various networtk traffic conditions; (2) a study on the usage and utility of multi-modality in the context of multilingual communication; (3) a comparaison of the features of the individual speech recognition engines. and (4) an end-to-end evaluation of the system.

International audience; Over the past year, we have developed a fully functional showcase of the NESPOLE! system within the domain of travel and tourism, and have significantly improved system performance and usability based on a series of studies and evaluations wih real users. Our experience has shown that improving translation quality is only one of the several important issues that must be addressed in achieving a practical real-world speech-to-speech translation system. This paper describes how we tackled these issues and evaluates their effect on system performance and usability. We focus on three main issues: (1) a study on the usage and utility of multi-modality in the context of multi-lingual communication; (2) assessing system performance under various network traffic conditions and architectural configurations; and (3) an end-to-end evaluation of the demonstration system.