Search

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVE: To report the first case of posterior spinal artery (PSA) infarct due to patent foramen ovale (PFO). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Infarct in the territories of PSA are very rare: till now 38 cases are reported in the literature. Moreover only 1 case of spinal cord infarction was attributed to paradoxical embolism through PFO, but in the anterior spinal artery territory. METHODS: A 60-year-old woman was hospitalized for sudden numbness of the right leg. Neurologic examination revealed right leg mild paresis and loss of proprioception and dysesthesia at T11. Spine-MRI showed T5-T7 posterolateral cord ischemia. Transesophageal echocardiography disclosed a PFO with severe right-left shunt confirmed by transcranial Doppler. RESULTS: During the hospitalization she was treated with oral-500 mg ticlopidine, because of a mild allergic reaction to acetylsalicylic acid. No steroids were administrated. Physiotherapy was performed daily. Motor and urinary symptoms disappeared in 20 days. At 1-month clinical follow-up only suspended dysesthesia on the right side was present. At 3 months follow-up spine-MRI showed no signal abnormalities within the spinal cord but the patient still complained of dysesthesia. The therapy was changed to oral 75 mg clopidogrel, cause of leucopoenia. At 1-year follow-up dysesthesia was still present, but less complaining and no recurrence and adverse effect due to clopidogrel therapy were reported. CONCLUSION: This report describe a case of acute nontraumatic myelopathy. At 4 days after onset, PSA infarct was diagnosed on the basis of neurologic findings and MR images. After extensive diagnostic work-up, we were able to identify only PFO, so it was the first case of PSA due to probable paradoxical embolism. The patient was treated with antiplatelet therapy with good recovery and no recurrence at 1-year follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sex may impact clinical outcomes in patients with stroke treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We aimed to investigate the sex differences in the short-term outcomes of DAPT within a real-world population of patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack., Methods: We performed a propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric cohort study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]) by including patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-10) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of transient ischemic attack, presence of diabetes [ABCD 2 ] ≥4) who initiated DAPT within 48 hours of symptom onset. The primary effectiveness outcome was the 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events. The secondary effectiveness outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal shift, vascular and all-cause mortality, and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcomes included the 90-day risk of moderate-to-severe and any bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 24-hour hemorrhagic transformation. Outcomes were compared between sexes using Cox and generalized ordinal logistic regression analyses, along with calculating risk differences and ratios., Results: From 2278 patients in the READAPT study cohort, we included 1643 mild-to-moderate strokes or high-risk transient ischemic attacks treated with DAPT (mean age, 69.8±12.0 years; 34.3% women). We matched 531 women and men. The 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events was significantly lower among women than men (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28-0.99]; P =0.039). There were no significant differences in secondary effectiveness outcomes. The 90-day risk of safety outcomes was extremely low and did not differ between women and men (moderate-to-severe bleedings: 0.4% versus 0.8%; P =0.413; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: 0.2% versus 0.4%; P =0.563). Subgroup analysis for primary effectiveness outcome showed a lower 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events among women aged <50 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0 to 5, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score <2, large artery atherosclerosis cause, and no diabetes., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that women with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack treated with DAPT may have lower short-term risk of recurrent ischemic events than men. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind potential sex-based differences in outcomes after DAPT use., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081., Competing Interests: Dr Piscaglia reports grants from Sanofi Genzyme, Roche Health Solutions, Inc, Novartis Pharma, Biogen, and Merck Company Foundation. Dr Paciaroni reports compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim, PFIZER CANADA INC, Bristol-Myers Squibb; iRhythm Technologies; SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, and Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH for other services. Dr Zini reports compensation from Bayer Healthcare for other services and Boehringer Ingelheim, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and CSL Behring for consultant services. Dr Ornello reports grants from Novartis, Pfizer, and Allergan and compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, and H. Lundbeck A S for other services; AbbVie and Eli Lilly for data and safety monitoring services; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries for consultant services; and reports and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Dr Sacco reports compensation from Novartis for other services; compensation from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Allergan, Novartis, PFIZER CANADA INC, Abbott Canada, H. Lundbeck A S, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly and Company for consultant services; and employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or TIA face an elevated cardiovascular risk, warranting intensive lipid-lowering therapy. Despite recommendations, adherence to guidelines is suboptimal, leading to frequent undertreatment. This study aims to evaluate the statin use after IS and TIA., Methods: LIPYDS is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study including ≥ 18-year-old patients discharged after IS/TIA from 19 Italian centers in 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine (1) the association between statin prescription (Any-statin versus No-statin), type (High-Intensity-statin versus Other-statin [Moderate/Low-Intensity]) with stroke etiology (TOAST), (2) clinical variables independently associated with statin prescription in the entire cohort and within TOAST categories., Results: We included 3,740 patients (median age 75 [IQR 64-82]; median LDL-C 104 [IQR 79-131]). At discharge, 1,971 (52.7%) received a High-intensity-statin, 800 (21.4%) Other-statin, 969 (25.9%) No-statin therapy. Among patients not on statin therapy before the event (N = 2686 [71.8%]), 50.1% initiated High-intensity-statin (78.2% of those with Large-Artery-Atherosclerosis, 60.8% Small-Vessel-Disease, 34.7% Cardioembolic, 47.4% Undetermined etiology); in 33% the decision to abstain from initiating statin therapy persisted. Large-Artery-Atherosclerosis showed the strongest association with Any-statin (aOR 3.07 [95%CI 2.39-3.95], p < 0.001) and High-intensity-statin (aOR 4.51 [95%CI 3.39-6.00], p < 0.001), while Cardioembolic stroke showed an inverse association (respectively, aOR 0.36 [95%CI 0.31-0.43], p < 0.001 and aOR 0.52 [95%CI 0.44-0.62], p < 0.001). Stepwise regression highlighted LDL-C and previous statin therapy as consistent predictors of statin at discharge. Older patients and women were less likely to be on a high-intensity formulation., Conclusion: Statins, especially at high-intensity, are under-prescribed after IS and TIA, with older patients, women and those with non-atherosclerotic strokes being the most affected., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Andrea Zini received funding for speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CSL Behring, Angels Initiative, Alexion-AstraZeneca, for scientific advisory board from Alexion-AstraZeneca and Bayer. Manuel Cappellari received consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer/Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. All other co-authors have no relevant competing interests related to this study. Ethical statement: This study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (Comitato Etico Milano Area 3, n. 290-20042022)., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background and Objectives: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <10 is unclear because this subpopulation has been substantially excluded from large clinical trials. The aim of our study was to determine whether MT ± IV thrombolysis (IVT) improves functional outcomes compared with IVT alone in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score <10., Methods: We emulated a hypothetical trial including adult patients with BAO, a baseline NIHSS score <10, and prestroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-2, comparing MT (±IVT) with IVT alone. We acquired data from patients receiving MT (±IVT) within 24 hours of onset from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke and data from patients treated only with IVT within 9 hours of symptom onset from the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register, from 2011 until 2021. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted for prespecified covariates to weight each individual's contribution to the outcome. The primary outcome was 90-day mRS scores 0-2. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS scores 0-1, 90-day mRS scores 4-5, mortality at 90 days, in-hospital death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage., Results: Among the 764 patients recruited from the 2 databases (477 men [62.4%]; mean age [±SD] 67.88 [±13.9] years), 410 (53.7%) received MT±IVT and 354 (46.3%) only IVT. After applying IPW, our population was composed of 710 MT and 707 IVT patients. Of these, 454 MT-treated (63.9%) and 383 IVT-treated (54.2%) patients had a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.56 [95% CI 1.04-2.03]). MT was also associated with a higher rate of mRS scores 0-1 (aOR 2.01 [95% CI 1.37-2.95]) and a lower rate of in-hospital death (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.25-0.78]). Among the subgroups tested, MT had a larger effect on 90-day mRS scores 0-2 for patients with NIHSS scores 6-9 than for patients with a NIHSS score <6 ( p for interaction 0.02)., Discussion: In a large-scale target trial emulation on patients with stroke from BAO and a NIHSS score <10, MT was associated with better functional outcomes compared with IVT alone. Further research is needed to confirm the benefit of MT in patients with a NIHSS score <6., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that MT ± intravenous thrombolysis is associated with better 90-day functional outcomes in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score < 10 compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone.

Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population., Methods: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and three prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24 h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage., Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% vs. 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%-6.1%); p = 0.047, risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07); p = 0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% vs. 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI: 6.4%-13.4%); p < 0.001, risk ratio 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37-1.97); p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and those who received antiplatelet loading dose., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill the criteria of landmark large clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring or Advisory Board; he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. SS reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h, which are classified as Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke., Methods: This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA-that is, those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h-who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD 2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days., Results: We included 517 patients-324 (62.7%) male-with a median (interquartile range-IQR) age of 74 (IQR = 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD 2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before ( p  = 0.178) and after matching ( p  = 0.518)., Conclusions: In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.Z. reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. R.O. reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. S.S. reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. DT reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background and Purpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved the efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed at evaluating effectiveness and safety of short-term DAPT in real-world, where treatment use is broader than in RCTs., Methods: READAPT (REAl-life study on short-term Dual Antiplatelet treatment in Patients with ischemic stroke or Transient ischemic attack) (NCT05476081) was an observational multicenter real-world study with a 90-day follow-up. We included patients aged 18+ receiving short-term DAPT soon after ischemic stroke or TIA. No stringent NIHSS and ABCD 2 score cut-offs were applied but adherence to guidelines was recommended. Primary effectiveness outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death due to vascular causes, primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the type of ischemic and hemorrhagic events, disability, cause of death, and compliance to treatment., Results: We included 1920 patients; 69.9% started DAPT after an ischemic stroke; only 8.9% strictly followed entry criteria or procedures of RCTs. Primary effectiveness outcome occurred in 3.9% and primary safety outcome in 0.6% of cases. In total, 3.3% cerebrovascular ischemic recurrences occurred, 0.2% intracerebral hemorrhages, and 2.7% bleedings; 0.2% of patients died due to vascular causes. Patients with NIHSS score ⩽5 and those without acute lesions at neuroimaging had significantly higher primary effectiveness outcomes than their counterparts. Additionally, DAPT start >24 h after symptom onset was associated with a lower likelihood of bleeding., Conclusions: In real-world, most of the patients who receive DAPT after an ischemic stroke or a TIA do not follow RCTs entry criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, short-term DAPT remains effective and safe in this population. No safety concerns are raised in patients with low-risk TIA, more severe stroke, and delayed treatment start., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, Bayer, and Astra Zeneca; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports compensations from Novartis and Allergan, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, SS reports compensations from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila. MPa reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc. DT reports compensation from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Data on safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in older patients are limited and controversial, and people aged 80 or older were under-represented in randomized trials. Our aim was to assess EVT effect for ischemic stroke patients aged ⩾80 at a nationwide level., Patients and Methods: The cohort included stroke patients undergoing EVT from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). Patients were a priori divided into younger and older groups (<80 vs ⩾80). Primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS, 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), successful reperfusion, EVT abortion. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between age groups for baseline features, functional status, stroke severity and neuroradiological features. Logistic regression was implemented to test the weight of age group on the predefined outcomes., Results: Overall, 5872 individuals (1:1 matching, n  = 2936 aged ⩾80 vs n  = 2936 < 80) were matched from 13,922 records. In ⩾80 group 34.1% had good functional outcome, vs 51.2% in <80 group (absolute difference = -17.1%, p  < 0.001), with a 4.4% excess in EVT abortion. Age ⩾80 was a negative independent predictor of good functional outcome (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3-0.5), but had no impact on sICH., Discussion and Conclusion: Age ⩾80 years represents a consistent predictor of worse functional outcome, independently from successful reperfusion and sICH. Cost-effectiveness studies are needed for tailored and implement sustainable care, and research should focus on strategies to improve functional outcome in older age patient groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MR declares support for educational activities from CLS-Behring and PRESTIGE-AF trial. SN declares consulting fees from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Stryker, and Balt. MC declares consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer/Bristol Meyer Squibb and Daiichi Sankyo. AZ received speaker and consultation fees from Alexion, CLS-Behring, Boehringer-Ingelheim. All the other authors report no disclosures.

Background: The outcomes of minor ischemic stroke resulting from small artery occlusion (SAO-MIS) have not yet been characterized after dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) has become the standard of care. We provided updated figures on the short-term prognosis of SAO-MIS treated with early short-term DAPT and compared the outcomes of SAO-MIS versus non-SAO-MIS patients., Methods: This is a prespecified sub-analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT, NCT05476081) including patients with minor (NIHSS≤5) non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke treated with DAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of 90-day symptomatic ischemic stroke or major cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were the 90-day ordinal distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, 90-day excellent functional outcome (mRS of 0 to 1), and 24-h early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes were 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe and any bleedings. All outcomes were compared between SAO-MIS and non-SAO-MIS patients., Results: We included 678 MIS, of whom 253 (37.3 %) were SAO-related. At 90 days, 3 patients with SAO-MIS had primary outcome (1.2 % [95 % CI 0.2 %-3.5 %]), which were all SAO-related ischemic strokes. For the secondary outcomes, most SAO-MIS patients (n = 191, 75.5 %) had 90-day excellent functional outcome and 12 had 24-h END (4.7 % [95 % CI 2.5 %-8.3 %]). Referring to safety outcomes, 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage occurred only in one patient with SAO-MIS (0.4 % [95 % CI 0.0 %- 2.2 %]). Compared to non-SAO-MIS, the 90-day risk of recurrent vascular events was significantly lower among SAO-MIS (aHR 0.24 [95 % CI 0.08-0.68]; p = 0.007), while there were not significant differences in other secondary outcomes, nor in the risk of safety events., Conclusions: Our findings show overall favorable short-term prognosis after SAO-MIS treated with DAPT. Future studies should investigate factors associated with residual stroke risk and long-term outcomes of SAO-MIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Andrea Zini reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. Raffaele Ornello reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Simona Sacco reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by University of L'Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. Maurizio Paciaroni reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. Danilo Toni reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was found to be beneficial in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior tandem occlusion (a-TO). Instead, little is known about the effectiveness of MT in stroke patients with posterior tandem occlusion (p-TO). We aimed to compare MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data of patients registered in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS) who were treated with MT within 24 h from last known well time for acute ischemic stroke with p-TO (n = 275) or a-TO (n = 1853)., Results: After adjustment for unbalanced pre-procedure variables (year 2015-2021, age, sex, NIHSS score, ASPECTS, and time strata for puncture groin) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, p-TO was significantly associated with lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.415, 95% CI 0.268-0.644) and with higher risk of death (OR 2.813, 95% CI 2.080-3.805) at 3 months. After adjustment for unbalanced procedural and post-procedure variables (IVT, general anesthesia, TICI 3, and 24-h HT) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, association between p-TO and lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.444, 95% CI 0.304-0.649) and association between p-TO and with higher risk of death (OR 2.971, 95% CI 1.993-4.429) remained significant., Conclusions: MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO was associated with worse outcomes at 3 months., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS., Methods and Results: This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P <0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes., Conclusions: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Background: We aim to assess the association between procedural time and outcomes in patients in unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation acute stroke., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data from patients with M1 and/or M2 segment of middle cerebral artery occlusion with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 0-1 at the end of procedure. Primary outcome was 90-day poor outcome. Secondary outcomes were early neurological deterioration (END), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to ECASS II and sICH according to SITS-MOST., Results: Among 852 patients, after comparing characteristics of favourable and poor outcome groups, logistic regression analysis showed age (OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001), previous TIA/stroke (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.12-0.74; p = 0.009), M1 occlusion (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.13-2.50; p = 0.01), baseline NIHSS (OR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.06-1.13; p < 0.001) and procedural time (OR:1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.003) as independent predictors poor outcome at 90 days. Concerning secondary outcomes, logistic regression analysis showed NIHSS (OR:0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.008), general anaesthesia (OR:2.59; 95%CI: 1.52-4.40; p < 0.001), procedural time (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.002) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 1.89; 95%CI: 1.02-3.52; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of END. Bridging therapy (OR:2.93; 95%CI: 1.21-7.09; p = 0.017) was associated with sICH per SITS-MOST criteria whereas M1 occlusion (OR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.18-0.69; p = 0.002), bridging therapy (OR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.07-3.82; p = 0.03) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 5.55; 95%CI: 2.72-11.31; p < 0.001) were independently associated with sICH per ECASS II criteria. No significant association was found between the number of MT attempts and analyzed outcomes., Conclusions: Regardless of the number of MT attempts and intraprocedural complications, procedural time was associated with poor outcome and END. We suggest a deeper consideration of procedural time when treating anterior circulation occlusions refractory to MT., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: There is little data on the role of endovascular treatment (EVT) of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) due to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Here, we describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of CVST-VITT patients who were treated with EVT., Patients and Methods: We report data from an international registry of patients who developed CVST within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reported between 29 March 2021 and 6 March 2023. VITT was defined according to the Pavord criteria., Results: EVT was performed in 18/136 (13%) patients with CVST-VITT (92% aspiration and/or stent retrieval, 8% local thrombolysis). Most common indications were extensive thrombosis and clinical or radiological deterioration. Compared to non-EVT patients, those receiving EVT had a higher median thrombus load (4.5 vs 3). Following EVT, local blood flow was improved in 83% (10/12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 54-96). One (6%) asymptomatic sinus perforation occurred. Eight (44%) patients treated with EVT also underwent decompressive surgery. Mortality was 50% (9/18, 95% CI 29-71) and 88% (8/9, 95% CI 25-66) of surviving EVT patients achieved functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at follow-up. In multivariable analysis, EVT was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66, 95% CI 0.16-2.58)., Discussion and Conclusion: We describe the largest cohort of CVST-VITT patients receiving EVT. Half of the patients receiving EVT died during hospital admission, but most survivors achieved functional independence., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AA serves as an advisory board member for Bayer and Bristol Myers Squibb and consulting fees for Boheringer Ingelheim. ABC received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. SM reports grants from Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo paid to her institution, and personal fees from Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Portola/Alexion and Daiichi Sankyo paid to her institution. AG received speaker’s honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daichii Sankyo, Pfizer, Occlutech, Merz, and Ipsen. CGE received funding to attend a conference from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer and speaker honoraria from the AAN. AS has received a grant from Swiss Heart Foundation. CC received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for advisory board participation from AstraZeneca and Biogen, and personal fees from Biogen and Bristol Myers Squibb. CGE received travel funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer and speaker honoraria from the AAN. DAS reports travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, DSMB participation for the SECRET trial, advisory board participation for AstraZeneca and membership on the ESO Executive Committee. EL received grants from the Swedish State, Swedish Neurologic Society, Elsa and Gustav Lindh’s Foundation, P-O Ahl’s Foundation and Rune and Ulla Amlöv’s Foundation. FD is a consultant/proctor for Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson, Balt, Cerus Endovascular and Phenox and received speaker’s honoraria from Acandis, Stryker, Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson, Asahi and research support from Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson. JMC received grants paid to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer for DSMB participation by Bayer. JMF reports fees and DSMB or Advisory Board participation for Boehringer Ingelheim and consulting fees from Bayer. JPa received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Herantis Pharma and Abbott and stock ownership in Vital Signum. MA reports compensation from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Covidien, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, Medtronic and research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Heart Foundation. MP received personal fees for advisory board participation from Alexion. MRH reports grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Bangerter Foundation, Swiss National Science Foundation, and SITEM Research Funds, and Advisory Board participation for Amgen. NR received research grants from Fulbright, Harvard University and Philippe Foundation. RL reports fees paid to his institution by Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Ischemaview, Medtronic, and Medpass. SN has received consulting fees from Brainomix and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and BMS-Pfizer. SP received research support from BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, European Union, German Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Helena Laboratories and Werfen and speakers’ honoraria/consulting fees from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, and Werfen. TK received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. TSF received study medication from Bayer Canada and personal fees from HLS Therapeutics. TT has received personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inventiva, and Portola Pharma. All other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Introduction: Medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) accounts for 30% of acute ischemic stroke cases. The risk/benefit profile of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or the combination of the two (bridging therapy (BT)) is still unclear in MeVO. Here, we compare reperfusion strategies in MeVO for clinical and radiological outcomes., Methods: This prospective single center study enrolled consecutive patients with AIS due to primary MeVO undergoing IVT, EVT, or BT at a comprehensive stroke center. Primary outcome was good functional status, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 3-month follow-up. Additional outcomes included mortality, successful recanalization, defined as mTICI ≥ 2b, stroke severity at discharge, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) according to SITS-MOST criteria. Logistic regression was modeled to define independent predictors of the primary outcome., Results: Overall, 180 consecutive people were enrolled (IVT = 59, EVT = 38, BT = 83), mean age 75. BT emerged as independent predictor of primary outcome (OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.08-7.07) together with age (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.9-0.97) and baseline NIHSS (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95). BT associated with a 20% relative increase in successful recanalization compared to EVT (74.4 vs 56.4%, p = 0.049). Rates of sICH (1.1%) and procedural complications (vasospasm 4.1%, SAH in 1.7%) were very low, with no difference across groups., Discussion: BT may carry a higher chance of good functional outcome compared to EVT/IVT only in people with AIS due to MeVO, with marginally higher rates of successful recanalization. Randomized trials are needed to define optimal treatment tailoring for MeVO., (© 2023. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background: Predictors of radiological complications attributable to reperfusion injury remain unknown when baseline setting is optimal for endovascular treatment and procedural setting is the best in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO)., Aims: To identify clinical and radiological/procedural predictors for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and cerebral edema (CED) at 24 hr in patients obtaining complete recanalization in one pass of thrombectomy for ischemic stroke ⩽ 6 h from symptom onset with intra-cranial anterior circulation LVO and ASPECTS ⩾ 6., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data from 1400 patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke., Results: HT was reported in 248 (18%) patients and early CED was reported in 260 (19.2%) patients. In the logistic regression model including predictors from a first model with clinical variables and from a second model with radiological/procedural variables, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio (OR) = 1.832, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.201-2.795), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (OR = 1.076, 95% CI = 1.044-1.110), lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECTS) (OR = 0.815, 95% CI = 0.694-0.957), and longer onset-to-groin time (OR = 1.005, 95% CI = 1.002-1.007) were predictors of HT, whereas general anesthesia was inversely associated with HT (OR = 0.540, 95% CI = 0.355-0.820). Higher NIHSS (OR = 1.049, 95% CI = 1.021-1.077), lower ASPECTS (OR = 0.700, 95% CI = 0.613-0.801), intravenous thrombolysis (OR = 1.464, 95% CI = 1.061-2.020), longer onset-to-groin time (OR = 1.002, 95% CI = 1.001-1.005), and longer procedure time (OR = 1.009, 95% CI = 1.004-1.015) were predictors of early CED. After repeating a fourth logistic regression model including also good collaterals, the same variables remained predictors for HT and/or early CED, except diabetes mellitus and thrombolysis, while good collaterals were inversely associated with early CED (OR = 0.385, 95% CI = 0.248-0.599)., Conclusions: Higher NIHSS, lower ASPECTS, and longer onset-to-groin time were predictors for both HT and early CED. General anesthesia and good collaterals were inversely associated with HT and early CED, respectively. Longer procedure time was predictor of early CED., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Manuel Cappellari received consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer/Bristol Meyer Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. Andrea Zini received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion and CLS Behring. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the second most important cardiac risk factor for stroke after atrial fibrillation (AF). Few data are available on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with HF., Methods: The source of data is the multicentre Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). All AIS patients ≥ 18 years receiving MT were categorised in two groups: HF and no-HF. Baseline clinical and neuroradiological findings on admission were analysed., Results: Of 8924 patients, 642 (7.2%) had HF. Compared to the no-HF group, HF patients had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Rate of complete recanalisation (TICI 2b-3) was 76.9% in HF vs 78.1% in no-HF group (p = 0.481). Rate of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage at 24-h non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) was 7.6% in HF vs 8.3% in no-HF patients (p = 0.520). At 3 months, 36.4% of HF patients and 48.2% of no-HF patients (p < 0.001) had mRS 0-2, and mortality was, respectively, 30.7% and 18.5% (p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, HF was independently associated with mortality at 3 months (OR 1.53, 1.24-1.88 95% CI, p < 0.001). In multivariate ordinal regression, HF patients had a probability of transitioning to a higher mRS level of 1.23 (1.05-1.44 95% CI, p = 0.012). The propensity score analysis of two groups matched for age, sex, and NIHSS at admission yielded the same results., Conclusion: MT is safe and effective in HF patients with AIS. Patients with HF and AIS suffered from higher 3-month mortality and unfavourable outcome regardless of acute treatments., (© 2023. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background and Purpose: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis due to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (CVST-VITT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. CVST-VITT patients often present with large intracerebral haemorrhages and a high proportion undergoes decompressive surgery. Clinical characteristics, therapeutic management and outcomes of CVST-VITT patients who underwent decompressive surgery are described and predictors of in-hospital mortality in these patients are explored., Methods: Data from an ongoing international registry of patients who developed CVST within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reported between 29 March 2021 and 10 May 2022, were used. Definite, probable and possible VITT cases, as defined by Pavord et al. (N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1680-1689), were included., Results: Decompressive surgery was performed in 34/128 (27%) patients with CVST-VITT. In-hospital mortality was 22/34 (65%) in the surgical and 27/94 (29%) in the non-surgical group (p < 0.001). In all surgical cases, the cause of death was brain herniation. The highest mortality rates were found amongst patients with preoperative coma (17/18, 94% vs. 4/14, 29% in the non-comatose; p < 0.001) and bilaterally absent pupillary reflexes (7/7, 100% vs. 6/9, 67% with unilaterally reactive pupil, and 4/11, 36% with bilaterally reactive pupils; p = 0.023). Postoperative imaging revealed worsening of index haemorrhagic lesion in 19 (70%) patients and new haemorrhagic lesions in 16 (59%) patients. At a median follow-up of 6 months, 8/10 of surgical CVST-VITT who survived admission were functionally independent., Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of surgical CVST-VITT patients died during hospital admission. Preoperative coma and bilateral absence of pupillary responses were associated with higher mortality rates. Survivors often achieved functional independence., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved that short-term (21-90 days) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the risk of early ischemic recurrences after a noncardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) without substantially increasing the hemorrhagic risk. We aimed at understanding whether and how real-world use of DAPT differs from RCTs., Methods: READAPT (Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or TIA) is a prospective cohort study including >18-year-old patients treated with DAPT after a noncardioembolic minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from 51 Italian centers. The study comprises a 90-day follow-up from symptom onset. In the present work, we reported descriptive statistics of baseline data of patients recruited up to July 31, 2022, and proportions of patients who would have been excluded from RCTs. We compared categorical data through the χ² test., Results: We evaluated 1070 patients, who had 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years median age, were mostly Caucasian (1045; 97.7%), and were men (711; 66.4%). Among the 726 (67.9%) patients with ischemic stroke, 226 (31.1%) did not meet the RCT inclusion criteria because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 and 50 (6.9%) because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >5. Among the 344 (32.1%) patients with TIA, 69 (19.7%) did not meet the RCT criteria because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <4 and 252 (74.7%) because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <6 and no symptomatic arterial stenosis. Additionally, 144 (13.5%) patients would have been excluded because of revascularization procedures. Three hundred forty-five patients (32.2%) did not follow the RCT procedures because of late (>24 hours) DAPT initiation; 776 (72.5%) and 676 (63.2%) patients did not take loading doses of aspirin and clopidogrel, respectively. Overall, 84 (7.8%) patients met the RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria., Conclusions: The real-world use of DAPT is broader than RCTs. Most patients did not meet the RCT criteria because of the severity of ischemic stroke, lower risk of TIA, late DAPT start, or lack of antiplatelet loading dose., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Purpose: The management of tandem extracranial internal carotid artery and intracranial large vessel occlusion during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been under-investigated. We sought to investigate outcomes of AIS patients with tandem occlusion (TO) treated with carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to those not treated with CAS (no-CAS) during EVT., Methods: We performed a cohort study using data from AIS patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke. Outcomes were 3 months' mortality, functional outcome, complete and successful recanalization, any intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage., Results: Among 466 AIS patients with TO, CAS patients were 122 and no-CAS patients were 226 (118 excluded). After adjustment for unbalanced variables, CAS was associated with a lower rate of 3 months' mortality (OR 0.407, 95% CI 0.171-0.969, p = 0.042). After adjustment for pre-defined variables, CAS was associated with a lower rate of 3 months' mortality (aOR 0.430, 95% CI 0.187-0.989, p = 0.047) and a higher rate of complete recanalization (aOR 1.986, 95% CI 1.121-3.518, p = 0.019), successful recanalization (aOR 2.433, 95% CI 1.263-4.686, p = 0.008) and parenchymal hematoma (aOR 2.876, 95% CI 1.173-7.050, p = 0.021). CAS was associated with lower 3 months mortality (OR 0.373, 95% CI 0.141-0.982, p = 0.046) and higher rates of successful recanalization (OR 2.082, 95% CI 1.099-3.942, p = 0.024) after adjustment for variables associated with 3 months' mortality and successful recanalization, respectively., Conclusions: Among AIS patients with TO, CAS during EVT was associated with a higher rate of successful reperfusion and a lower rate of 3 months' mortality., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Belgian Neurological Society.)

Introduction: Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke., Patients and Methods: We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups., Results: Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39-4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12-4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63-3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67-3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73-3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85-7.16)., Discussion and Conclusion: People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have no conflict of interest related to this work. Relevant disclosures outside the submitted work: MP received honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. VC received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. SS reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Allergan, Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Bayer, Pfizer, Medtronic, Starmed, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. SR reports nonfinancial support from Bayer. AZ declares consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion and CLS Behring, and declares grant from the Italian Ministry of Health as principal investigator for clinical trial (RF-2019-12370834). DT reports fees for advisory board and speaker honoraria from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Pfizer. All other authors have nothing to declare., (© European Stroke Organisation 2022.)

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) due to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe condition, with high in-hospital mortality rates. Here, we report clinical outcomes of patients with CVT-VITT after SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) vaccination who survived initial hospitalization., Methods: We used data from an international registry of patients who developed CVT within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, collected until February 10, 2022. VITT diagnosis was classified based on the Pavord criteria. Outcomes were mortality, functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), VITT relapse, new thrombosis, and bleeding events (all after discharge from initial hospitalization)., Results: Of 107 CVT-VITT cases, 43 (40%) died during initial hospitalization. Of the remaining 64 patients, follow-up data were available for 60 (94%) patients (37 definite VITT, 9 probable VITT, and 14 possible VITT). Median age was 40 years and 45/60 (75%) patients were women. Median follow-up time was 150 days (interquartile range, 94-194). Two patients died during follow-up (3% [95% CI, 1%-11%). Functional independence was achieved by 53/60 (88% [95% CI, 78%-94%]) patients. No new venous or arterial thrombotic events were reported. One patient developed a major bleeding during follow-up (fatal intracerebral bleed)., Conclusions: In contrast to the high mortality of CVT-VITT in the acute phase, mortality among patients who survived the initial hospitalization was low, new thrombotic events did not occur, and bleeding events were rare. Approximately 9 out of 10 CVT-VITT patients who survived the acute phase were functionally independent at follow-up.

Objective: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) caused by vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare adverse effect of adenovirus-based severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines. In March 2021, after autoimmune pathogenesis of VITT was discovered, treatment recommendations were developed. These comprised immunomodulation, non-heparin anticoagulants, and avoidance of platelet transfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to these recommendations and its association with mortality., Methods: We used data from an international prospective registry of patients with CVT after the adenovirus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We analyzed possible, probable, or definite VITT-CVT cases included until January 18, 2022. Immunomodulation entailed administration of intravenous immunoglobulins and/or plasmapheresis., Results: Ninety-nine patients with VITT-CVT from 71 hospitals in 17 countries were analyzed. Five of 38 (13%), 11 of 24 (46%), and 28 of 37 (76%) of the patients diagnosed in March, April, and from May onward, respectively, were treated in-line with VITT recommendations (p < 0.001). Overall, treatment according to recommendations had no statistically significant influence on mortality (14/44 [32%] vs 29/55 [52%], adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16-1.19). However, patients who received immunomodulation had lower mortality (19/65 [29%] vs 24/34 [70%], adjusted OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06-0.58). Treatment with non-heparin anticoagulants instead of heparins was not associated with lower mortality (17/51 [33%] vs 13/35 [37%], adjusted OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.24-2.04). Mortality was also not significantly influenced by platelet transfusion (17/27 [63%] vs 26/72 [36%], adjusted OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 0.74-6.54)., Conclusions: In patients with VITT-CVT, adherence to VITT treatment recommendations improved over time. Immunomodulation seems crucial for reducing mortality of VITT-CVT. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:562-573., (© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Objective: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase has been associated with better clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with confirmed large vessel occlusions compared to IVT with alteplase. However, the utility of tenecteplase for the treatment of all AIS patients eligible for IVT has not been established., Methods: We compared the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in AIS patients by analyzing propensity score matched data from 20 centers participating in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. Patients receiving IVT with tenecteplase were matched with up to 3 patients receiving alteplase from the same center. The primary outcome of interest was the distribution of 3-month functional outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the rates of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) in the first 24 hours, excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score = 0-1) or good (mRS score = 0-2) functional outcome, and all-cause mortality at 3 months., Results: A total of 331 tenecteplase-treated AIS patients were matched to 797 patients treated with alteplase (median age = 70 years, 43.9% women, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 11, interquartile range = 6-17). Patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month functional outcomes (common odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-2.00) with higher odds of good functional outcome (OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.45-2.77) and a lower likelihood of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.27-0.67) at 3 months, compared to alteplase-treated patients. No difference was found in the likelihood of the 3-month excellent functional outcomes (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.96-1.78) and 24-hour SICH (1.0% vs 1.3%, OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.20-2.64)., Interpretation: IVT with tenecteplase was associated with better 3-month clinical outcomes compared to IVT with alteplase in AIS patients, with no increased risk of symptomatic intracranial bleeding. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:349-357., (© 2022 American Neurological Association.)