Search

What are the long-term costs and effects of oil- versus water-based contrast in infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG)? This economic evaluation of a long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial involved 1119 infertile women randomized to HSG with oil- (n = 557) or water-based contrast (n = 562) in the Netherlands. In the oil-based contrast group, 39.8% of women needed no other treatment, 34.6% underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) and 25.6% had IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the 5 years following HSG. In the water-based contrast group, 35.0% of women had no other treatment, 34.2% had IUI and 30.8% had IVF/ICSI in the 5 years following HSG (P = 0.113). After 5 years of follow-up, HSG using oil-based contrast resulted in equivalent costs (mean cost difference –€144; 95% confidence interval [CI] –€579 to +€290; P = 0.515) for a 5% increase in the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compared with HSG using water-based contrast (80% compared with 75%, Relative Risk (RR) 1.07; 95% CI 1.00–1.14). Similarly, HSG with oil-based contrast resulted in equivalent costs (mean cost difference –€50; 95% CI –€576 to +€475; P = 0.850) for a 7.5% increase in the cumulative live birth rate compared with HSG with water-based contrast (74.8% compared with 67.3%, RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03–1.20), making it the dominant strategy. Scenario analyses suggest that the oil-based contrast medium is the dominant strategy up to a price difference of €300. Over a 5-year follow-up, HSG with an oil-based contrast was associated with a 5% increase in ongoing pregnancy rate, a 7.5% increase in live birth rate and similar costs to HSG with water-based contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since caesarean sections (CSs) before 39+0 weeks gestation are associated with higher rates of neonatal respiratory morbidity, it is recommended to delay elective CSs until 39+0 weeks. However, this bears the risk of earlier spontaneous labour resulting in unplanned CSs, which has workforce and resource implications, specifically in smaller obstetric units. Aim: To assess, in a policy of elective CSs from 39+0 weeks onward, the number of unplanned CSs to prevent one neonate with respiratory complications, as compared to early elective CS. Materials and Methods: We performed a decision analysis comparing early term elective CS at 37+0–6 or 38+0–6 weeks to elective prelabour CS, without strict medical indication, at 39+0–6 weeks, with earlier unplanned CS, in women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. We used literature data to calculate the number of unplanned CSs necessary to prevent one neonate with respiratory morbidity. Results: Planning all elective CSs at 39+0–6 weeks required 10.9 unplanned CSs to prevent one neonate with respiratory morbidity, compared to planning all elective CSs at 38+0–6 weeks. Compared to planning all elective CSs at 37+0–6 weeks we needed to perform 3.3 unplanned CSs to prevent one neonate with respiratory morbidity. Conclusion: In a policy of planning all elective pre‐labour CSs from 39+0 weeks of gestation onward, between three and 11 unplanned CSs have to be performed to prevent one neonate with respiratory morbidity. Therefore, in our opinion, fear of early term labour and workforce disutility is no argument for scheduling elective CSs <39+0 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate whether a prognosis-tailored triage of ART for couples with idiopathic infertility by using the Hunault prognostic model can decrease the cost of treatment without compromising the chance of live birth. This is a retrospective study conducted in an Australian fertility clinic. Couples seeking infertility consultation who were subsequently found to have idiopathic infertility after evaluation were included. We compared the costs per conception leading to live birth of the prognosis-tailored strategy with the immediate ART strategy, which generally reflects the current practice in Australian fertility clinics, over a 24-month period. In the prognosis-tailored strategy, for each couple, the prognosis for natural conception was assessed using the well-established Hunault model. Total cost of treatments were calculated as the sum of typical out-of-pocket and Australian Medicare cost (Australian national insurance scheme). We studied 261 couples. In the prognosis-tailored strategy, the total cost was $2,766,781 and the live birth rate was 63.9%. In contrast, the immediate ART strategy yielded a live birth rate of 64.4% with a total cost of $3,176,845. Implementing the prognosis-tailored strategy using the Hunault model saved $410,064 in total and $1,571 per couple. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $341,720 per live birth. In couples with idiopathic infertility, assessment of prognosis for natural conception using the Hunault model and delaying ART for 12 months in couples with favourable prognoses can considerably reduce costs without significantly compromising live birth rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]