Search

Drug impurities are undesirable but unavoidable chemicals which can occur throughout the drug life cycle. The safety implications of drug impurities can be significant given that they can impact safety, quality, and efficacy of drug products and that certain drug impurities are mutagenic, carcinogenic, or teratogenic. The characteristics of drug impurities could be specific to drug modalities (e.g., small molecules vs. biologics). The commonly encountered drug impurities include elemental impurity, residual solvent, organic impurity, host cell protein and DNA, residual viral vector, extractable and leachable, and particle. They can cause various adverse effects such as immunogenicity, infection, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity upon significant exposure. Therefore, the effective control of these drug impurities is central for patient safety. Regulations and guidelines are available for drug developers to manage them. Their qualification is obtained based on authoritative qualification thresholds or safety assessment following the classic toxicological risk assessment. The current review focuses on the safety assessment science and methodology used for diverse types of drug impurities. Due to the different nature of diverse drug impurities, their safety assessment represents a significant challenge for drug developers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Healthcare accounts for 5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with medicines making a sizeable contribution. Product-level medicine emission data is limited, hindering mitigation efforts. To address this, we created Medicine Carbon Footprint (MCF) Classifier, to estimate, standardize, stratify and visualize medicine carbon footprints., Methods: We used molecular weight and chemical structure to estimate the process mass intensity and global warming potential of the active pharmaceutical ingredient in small molecule medicines. This allowed us to estimate medicine carbon footprints per dose, which we categorized into MCF Ratings, accessible via a searchable web application, MCF Formulary. We performed comparison and sensitivity analyses to validate the ratings, and stratification analyses by therapeutic indication to identify priority areas for emission reduction interventions., Results: We generated standardized medicine carbon footprints for 2214 products, with 38% rated LOW, 35% MEDIUM, 25% HIGH and 2% VERY HIGH. These products represented 2.2 billion NHS England prescribed doses in January 2023, with a total footprint of 140 000 tonnes CO 2 e, equivalent to the monthly emissions of 940 000 cars. Notably, three antibiotics-amoxicillin, flucloxacillin and penicillin V-contributed 15% of emissions. We estimate that implementing the recommended 20% antibiotic prescription reduction could save 4200 tonnes CO 2 e per month, equivalent to removing 29 000 cars., Conclusions: Standardized medicine carbon footprints have utility in assessing and addressing the carbon emissions of medicines, and the potential to inform and catalyse changes needed to align better healthcare and net zero commitments., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

The pursuit of harnessing data for knowledge creation has been an enduring quest, with the advent of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) marking significant milestones in this journey. ML, a subset of AI, emerged as the practice of employing mathematical models to enable computers to learn and improve autonomously based on their experiences. In the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical sectors, a significant portion of manufacturing data remains untapped or insufficient for practical use. Recognizing the potential advantages of leveraging the available data for process design and optimization, manufacturers face the daunting challenge of data utilization. Diverse proprietary data formats and parallel data generation systems compound the complexity. The transition to Pharma 4.0 necessitates a paradigm shift in data capture, storage, and accessibility for manufacturing and process operations. This paper highlights the pivotal role of AI in converting process data into actionable knowledge to support critical functions throughout the whole product life cycle. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of maintaining compliance with data integrity guidelines, as mandated by regulatory bodies globally. Embracing AI-driven transformations is a crucial step toward shaping the future of the pharmaceutical industry, ensuring its competitiveness and resilience in an evolving landscape., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopted Guideline M10 entitled "Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis" in May 2022. In October 2023, approximately one year after the adoption of the ICH M10 guideline, a "Hot Topic" session was held during the AAPS PharmSci 360 meeting to discuss the implementation of the guideline. The session focused on items the bioanalytical community felt were challenging to implement or ambiguous within the guideline. These topics included cross-validation, parallelism, comparative bioavailability studies, combination drug stability, endogenous analyte bioanalysis, and dilution QCs. In addition, the regulatory perspective on the guideline was presented. This report provides a summary of the Hot Topic session., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Following the European Commission decision to develop a roadmap to phase out animal testing and the signing of the US Modernisation Act, there is additional pressure on regulators and the pharmaceutical industry to abandon animal experimentation in safety testing. Often, endeavours already made by governments, regulators, trade associations, and industry to replace, reduce and refine animal experimentation (3Rs) are unnoticed. Herein, we review such endeavours to promote wider application and acceptance of 3Rs. ICH guidelines have stated 3Rs objectives and have enjoyed many successes driven by global consensus. Initiatives driven by US and European regulators such as the removal of the Abnormal Toxicity Test are neutralised by reticent regional regulators. Stream-lined testing requirements have been proposed for new modalities, oncology, impurity management and animal pharmacokinetics/metabolism. Use of virtual controls, value of the second toxicity species, information sharing and expectations for life-threatening diseases, human specific or well-characterised targets are currently being scrutinised. Despite much effort, progress falls short of the ambitious intent of decisionmakers. From a clinical safety and litigation perspective pharmaceutical companies and regulators are reluctant to step away from current paradigms unless replacement approaches are validated and globally accepted. Such consensus has historically been best achieved through ICH initiatives., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n = 466) was analyzed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

Objectives: In intensive care units, the mixing of injectable drugs via Y-site administration is often necessary. However, some mixtures can lead to physical incompatibility or chemical instability. To assist healthcare professionals, several databases such as Stabilis compile compatibility and stability data. The objectives of this study were to update the online database Stabilis by adding physical compatibility data to the website and to characterise the incompatibility data already present in the database by specifying the phenomenon at the origin of the incompatibility and its time of occurrence., Methods: Bibliographic sources referenced in Stabilis were evaluated using several criteria. After the evaluation, studies were rejected or the data they contain were added to the database. Data entries contained the following information: name of the two injectable drugs involved in the mixture and their concentration if available, the dilution solvent and the phenomenon at the origin of the incompatibility and its time of occurrence for incompatibility data. Three functions of the website were modified, including the 'Y-site compatibility table' function, which allows creation of customised compatibility tables., Results: A total of 1184 bibliographic sources were evaluated, 77.3% (n=915) of which were scientific articles, 20.5% (n=243) were Summaries of Product Characteristics and 2.2% (n=26) were communications in a pharmaceutical congress. After evaluation, 28.9% (n=342) of the sources were rejected. From the 71.1% (n=842) sources selected, 8073 (70.2%) compatibility data entries and 3433 incompatibility data entries (29.8%) were made. With the addition of these data, the database contained compatibility and incompatibility data for 431 injectable drugs., Conclusions: Since the update, the 'Y-site compatibility table' function has seen its traffic increased by about 66% (∼1500 tables per month compared with ∼2500 tables per month). Stabilis is now more complete to offer significant help to healthcare professionals with their problems of drug stability and compatibility., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The pharmaceutical industry must maintain stringent quality assurance standards to ensure product safety and regulatory compliance. A key component of the well-known Six Sigma methodology for process improvement and quality control is precise and comprehensive documentation. However, there are a number of significant issues with traditional documentation procedures, including as slowness, human error, and difficulties with regulatory standards. This review research looks at innovative ways to employ machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance Six Sigma documentation processes in the pharmaceutical sector. AI and ML provide cutting-edge technologies that have the potential to drastically alter documentation processes by automating data entry, collection, and analysis. Natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision technologies have the potential to significantly reduce human error rates and increase the efficacy of documentation processes. By applying machine learning algorithms to support real-time data analysis, predictive analytics, and proactive quality management, pharmaceutical organizations may be able to identify potential quality issues early on and take proactive efforts to address them. Combining AI and ML improves documentation accuracy and reliability while also strengthening compliance with stringent regulatory criteria. The primary barriers and limitations to the current state of Six Sigma documentation in the pharmaceutical industry are identified in this study. It examines the fundamentals of AI and ML with an emphasis on their specific applications in quality assurance and potential benefits for Six Sigma processes. The report includes extensive case studies that highlight notable developments and explain how AI/ML enhanced documentation is used in the real world.

The last decade has seen Advanced Medicines Manufacturing (AMM) progress from isolated product developments to the creation of industry-academic centres of excellence, regulatory innovation progressing leading to new standards, and product commercialisation across multiple product formats. This paper examines these developments focusing on successful applications and strategies presented at the 2023 Symposium of the International Consortium for Advanced Medicines Manufacturing (ICAMM). Despite these exemplar applications, there remain significant challenges to the sector-wide adoption of AMM technologies. Drawing on Symposium delegate expert responses to open-ended questions, our coding-based thematic analysis suggest three primary enablers drive successful adoption of AMM technologies at scale, namely: the ability to leverage pre-competitive collaborations to challenge-based problem solving; information and knowledge sharing through centres of excellence; and the development of AMM specific regulatory standards. Further analysis of expert responses identified the emergence of a 'Platform creation' approach to AMM innovation; characterised by: i) New collaboration modes; ii) Exploration of common product-process platforms for new dosage forms and therapy areas; iii) Development of modular equipment assets that enable scale-out, and offer more decentralized or distributed manufacturing models; iv) Standards based on product-process platform archetypes; v) Implementation strategies where platform-thinking and AMM technologies can significantly reduce timelines between discovery, approval and GMP readiness. We provide a definition of the Platform creation concept for AMM and discuss the requirements for its systematic development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 American Pharmacists Association. All rights reserved.)

In the execution of its legislated responsibilities, the United States Food and Drug Administration commonly refers to standard test methods detailed in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Microbiological test methods (contained in general chapters) are listed in chapters <51> to <80> with details regarded as enforceable where referenced as a test method. USP <61> "Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests" is a globally harmonized chapter that has been successfully employed for the enumeration of microorganisms recoverable from nonsterile finished drug products. The content of USP <61> is not always scientifically principled nor emphatically understood by all pharmaceutical microbiologists. Consequently, misunderstanding and misapplication of USP <61> may result in analyses and assessments of microbiological quality that are flawed or erroneous. In this article, clarification is provided to assist the pharmaceutical microbiologist in the appropriate and intended use of USP <61>, including provision of details not always commonly known or understood., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

Leachables are quantified and identified to enable their quantitative toxicological safety risk assessment (qTSRA). The leachable's reported concentration and identity must meet certain quality expectations to be suitable for qTSRA. In this Correspondence, the author considers accuracy and protectiveness as competing key quality attributes and suggests that protectiveness is the proper quality attribute for qTSRA, as qTSRA is based on the foundation that a leachable's potential adverse effect on patient health and safety must not be underestimated. Considering this conclusion, means of making concentration estimates and proposed identities protective are discussed., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

Background: In July 2019, the Heads of Medicines Agencies/European Medicines Agency (HMA/EMA) Task Force on Availability of Authorised Medicines for Human and Veterinary Use (TFAAM) published good practice guidance which provides key principles for European Union (EU) regulatory authorities for communication on shortages and availability issues. The use of a shortage catalogue was a key recommendation., Objectives: To assess how EU/European Economic Area (EEA) national competent authorities have implemented the recommendations of the good practice guidance., Methods: A survey was run in 2020 among EU/EEA national competent authorities to assess communication practices. The results were compared with those of a similar survey carried out 2 years earlier, before publication of the guidance. The survey covered human medicines only and was sent to 31 authorities: one per EU/EEA member state (and two to Germany's two medicines regulatory authorities)., Results: In 2020, 81% of authorities (25/31) had a dedicated public shortage catalogue on their website. This was an increase from 74% (23/31) in 2018, when a similar survey was run. In future this is expected to increase to 87% with two more member states making plans to implement catalogues. Although many member states publish information on shortages there is still selection in terms of the details that are being published, and there is further scope to extend the information currently provided., Conclusion: Since publication of the EMA/HMA good practice guide in 2019, transparency has increased across the EU/EEA, and public catalogues of shortages are now a routine tool used by many medicines agencies.Further opportunities to improve transparency on supply issues lie ahead with the EMA network strategy to 2025, the revised EU pharmaceutical legislation and the new legal mandate reinforcing the role of the EMA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose no relevant interests.

Permitted Daily Exposure Limits (PDEs) are set for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) to control cross-contamination when manufacturing medicinal products in shared facilities. With the lack of official PDE lists for pharmaceuticals, PDEs have to be set by each company separately. Although general rules and guidelines for the setting of PDEs exist, inter-company variations in the setting of PDEs occur and are considered acceptable within a certain range. To evaluate the robustness of the PDE approach between different pharmaceutical companies, data on PDE setting of five marketed APIs (amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, morphine, and omeprazole) were collected and compared. Findings show that the variability between PDE values is within acceptable ranges (below 10-fold) for all compounds, with the highest difference for morphine due to different Point of Departures (PODs) and Adjustment Factors (AFs). Factors of PDE variability identified and further discussed are: (1) availability of data, (2) selection of POD, (3) assignment of AFs, (4) route-to-route extrapolation, and (5) expert judgement and differences in company policies. We conclude that the investigated PDE methods and calculations are robust and scientifically defensible. Additionally, we provide further recommendations to harmonize PDE calculation approaches across the pharmaceutical industry., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The author and co-authors are employed by pharmaceutical companies., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

ICH Q3A/B guidelines are not intended for application during the clinical research phase of development and durationally adjusted qualification thresholds are not included. A central tenet of ICH Q3A is that lifetime exposure to 1 mg/day of an unqualified non-mutagenic impurity (NMI) is not a safety concern. An analysis of in vivo toxicology data from 4878 unique chemicals with established NO(A)ELs was conducted to determine whether durationally adjusted qualification limits can be supported. Although not recommended in ICH Q3A/B, a conservative approach was taken by using allometric scaling in the analysis. Following allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from available chronic toxicology studies, it was reconfirmed that there is a safety basis for the 1 mg/day qualification threshold in ICH Q3A. Additionally, allometric scaling of the 5th percentile of the distribution of NO(A)ELs from sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicology studies could support acceptable limits of 20 and 5 mg/day for an unqualified NMI for dosing durations of less than or greater than one month, respectively. This analysis supports durationally adjusted NMI qualification thresholds for pharmaceuticals that protect patient safety and contribute to 3Rs efforts for qualifying impurities using new approach methods., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Michelle Kenyon reports a relationship with Pfizer Research and Development that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Elizabeth A. Martin reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Nigel Greene reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Pfizer Research and Development reports a relationship with Matthew Martin that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Susanne Brandstetter reports a relationship with Merck Healthcare KGaA that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Teresa Wegesser reports a relationship with Amgen Inc that includes: employment and equity or stocks. James Harvey reports a relationship with GSK that includes: employment and equity or stocks and a relationship with Lhasa Limited that includes: Board Director/Trustee., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

ICH Q3A/B guidelines provide qualification thresholds for impurities or degradation products in new drug substances and products. However, the guidelines note that certain impurities/degradation products may warrant further safety evaluation for being unusually potent or toxic. The purpose of this study was to confirm that especially toxic non-mutagenic compounds are rare and to identify classes of compounds that could warrant lower qualification thresholds. A total of 2815 compounds were evaluated, of which 2213 were assessed as non-mutagenic. For the purpose of this analysis, compounds were considered potent when the point of departure was ≤0.2 mg/kg/day based on the qualification threshold (1 mg/day or 0.02 mg/kg/day for a 50 kg human) in a new drug substance, with an additional 10-fold margin. Only 54 of the entire set (2.4%) would be considered potent based on this conservative potency analysis, confirming that the existing ICH Q3A/B qualification thresholds are appropriate for the majority of impurities. If the Q3A/B threshold, without the additional 10-fold margin is used, 14 compounds (0.6%) are considered "highly potent". Very few non-mutagenic structural classes were identified, including organothiophosphates and derivatives, polychlorinated benzenes and polychlorinated polycyclic aliphatics, that correlate with potential high potency, consistent with prior publications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Worldwide organisations advocate standardising the management of intravenous drugs as an essential strategy to increase safety in paediatric healthcare settings. Intravenous administration is a route associated with some potential complications. Many adverse events are related to the use of intravenous medications, and the great variability in their handling and preparation represents an added risk that jeopardises the safety of children., Purpose: To standardise the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly administered to Spanish hospitalised paediatric and neonatal patients., Methods: The process leading to the standardisation of concentrations was undertaken following a two-round modified Delphi procedure. The consensus included the most common drugs administered by continuous or intermittent intravenous infusion to hospitalised and/or critically ill paediatric patients., Results: For paediatric patients, the proposal included a total of 102 drugs (45 continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion), with 192 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 101 drugs (99%), of which 44 were continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion; 160 concentrations were standardised (72.7%). For neonates, the initial proposal included 80 drugs (38 continuous infusion and 43 intermittent infusion), with 189 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 80 drugs (100%), of which 38 were continuous infusion and 43 were intermittent infusion; 120 concentrations were standardised (49.2%)., Conclusions: This proposal showed that standardisation is a feasible approach that can be reached by other healthcare institutions. It can be used in other centres and contribute in the future to unifying paediatric clinical practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The opioid epidemic continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. In 2020, 83% of opioid-related overdose deaths were due to synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl. Drug checking services have been widely implemented as a harm reduction intervention to facilitate the identification of substances in a drug sample. There is a need to inform decision-making on drug checking technologies and service implementation. This research aims to outline contextual considerations for the implementation of a drug checking service., Methods: A scoping review was conducted using a structured search strategy in PubMed and EMBASE. Articles were independently screened by two reviewers, and included if they were primary literature and reported on an actionable consideration(s) for drug checking services. Data elements were extracted using a standardized form, and included study design, study population, drug checking technology utilized or discussed, and main findings., Results: Twenty-nine articles were selected for inclusion, and four primary areas of consideration were identified: drug checking technologies, venue of a drug checking service, legality, and privacy. Technological considerations include the need for highly accurate, quantitative results which appeal to both populations of people with drug use disorder and recreational users. Accessibility of services was identified as an important factor that may be impacted by the location, integration with other services, how the service is provided (mobile vs. fixed), and the hours of operation. Maintaining plausible deniability and building trust were seen as important facilitators to service use and engagement. Issues surrounding legality were the most frequently cited barrier by patrons, including fear of criminalization, policing, and surveillance. Patrons and stakeholders identified a need for supportive policies that offer protections. Maintaining anonymity for patrons is crucial to addressing privacy-related barriers., Conclusion: This review highlights the need to understand the local population and climate for drug checking to implement a drug checking service successfully. Common themes identified in the literature included considerations related to the choice of technology, the type of venue, and the impact of legality and privacy. We intend to utilize these considerations in future research to help guide discussions with US-based stakeholders., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

A primary function of the parenteral drug product manufacturing process is to ensure sterility of the final product. The two most common methods for sterilizing parenteral drug products are terminal sterilization (TS), whereby the drug product is sterilized in the final container following filling and finish, and membrane sterilization, whereby the product stream is sterilized by membrane filtration and filled into presterilized containers in an aseptic processing environment. Although TS provides greater sterility assurance than membrane sterilization and aseptic processing, not all drug products are amenable to TS processes, which typically involve heat treatment or exposure to ionizing radiation. Oligonucleotides represent an emerging class of therapeutics with great potential for treating a broad range of indications, including previously undruggable targets. Owing to their size, structural complexity, and relative lack of governing regulations, several challenges in drug development are unique to oligonucleotides. This exceptionality justifies a focused assessment of traditional chemistry, manufacturing, and control strategies before their adoption. In this article, we review the current state of sterile oligonucleotide drug product processing, highlight the key aspects to consider when assessing options for product sterilization, and provide recommendations to aid in the successful evaluation and development of TS processes. We also explore current regulatory expectations and provide our interpretation as it pertains to oligonucleotide drug products.

In 2018, high levels of the IARC class IIA carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) were analytically verified in the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) valsartan, resulting in extensive regulatory action on angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists and recall of finished drug products by the pharmaceutical industry to ensure patient safety. The root cause of contamination was the unintended reaction of common reagents utilized during drug synthesis. This lead to serious effects on drug quality and immediate regulatory action. Thus, routine analysis of drug product contents are inevitable and necessitate thoroughly performed work up procedures of the product as well as adequate validated analytical methods. The nature of N-nitrosamines (NA), ranging from small, semi-volatile compounds up to highly polar molecules, effort sophisticated requirements in terms of instrumental analysis. Up today, gas as well as liquid chromatographic devices coupled to mass spectrometers are the most widespread systems for analysis. Gas chromatographic - mass spectrometric (GC-MS) systems, obviously superior towards liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for detecting small volatile compounds like NDMA, reach their limits for broadly designed studies including polar or acidic NA. In this study, a complementary and highly sensitive approach by means of liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is presented, including detection of 13 NA deduced from major classes of secondary amines. Thereby, the fully validated approach was performed in accordance to ICH and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. Quantitative proof-of-concept measurements with various APIs and market authorized tablets as representative drug formulations conclude applicability for further presumably contaminated substances. The approach employs organic or inorganic extraction steps with solid phase extraction (SPE). The limit of detection for the most prominent NA, NDMA and N-diethylnitrosamine (NDEA), were both 0.025 parts-per-billion (ppb) per matrix, respectively., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The release of the FDA's guidance on Process Analytical Technology has motivated and supported the pharmaceutical industry to deliver consistent quality medicine by acquiring a deeper understanding of the product performance and process interplay. The technical opportunities to reach this high-level control have considerably evolved since 2004 due to the development of advanced analytical sensors and chemometric tools. However, their transfer to the highly regulated pharmaceutical sector has been limited. To this respect, data fusion strategies have been extensively applied in different sectors, such as food or chemical, to provide a more robust performance of the analytical platforms. This survey evaluates the challenges and opportunities of implementing data fusion within the PAT concept by identifying transfer opportunities from other sectors. Special attention is given to the data types available from pharmaceutical manufacturing and their compatibility with data fusion strategies. Furthermore, the integration into Pharma 4.0 is discussed.

The researchers, in series of articles, analyze significance of the default of 1998 for both pharmaceutical industry and participants of pharmaceutical market. The Report I presents results of investigation of corresponding economic and social aspects of issue. The article presents contradictions in tax and financial policies of then ruling authorities; regulatory drawbacks created by inefficient awareness of economic situation and social specificity of pharmaceutics; means for pharmaceutical companies to survive in these conditions.

The main considerations for the development of a formulation for preclinical safety assessment testing are explored. Intravenous, inhalation, oral and dermal dosing are given focus and although different dose routes do present their own individual challenges there are common themes that emerge. In each case it is necessary to maximise exposure to achieve high doses to satisfy regulatory requirements for safety assessment testing. This often involves producing formulations that are at the limits of solubility and maximum volumes possible for administration to different test species by the chosen route. It is concluded that for all routes it is important to thoroughly explore the stability of the test item in the proposed formulation matrix well ahead of dosing any animals, giving careful consideration to which excipients are used and what their underlying toxicity profile may be for the relevant preclinical species. In addition, determining the maximum achievable concentrations and weighing that against the maximum volumes that can be given by the chosen route in all the test species at an early stage will also give a read on whether it would be theoretically possible to achieve suitably high enough doses to support clinical work. Not doing so can cause delays in the development programme and may have ethical repercussions.

The growth in drug development over the past years reflects significant advancements in basic sciences and a greater understanding of molecular pathways of disease. Benchmarking industry practices has been important to enable a critical reflection on the path to evolve pharmaceutical testing, and the outcome of past industry surveys has had some impact on best practices in testing. A survey was provided to members of SPS, ACT, and STP. The survey consisted of 37 questions and was provided to 2550 participants with a response rate of 24%. Most respondents (∼75%) came from the US and Europe. The survey encompassed multiple topics encountered in nonclinical testing of pharmaceuticals. The most frequent target indications were oncology (69%), inflammation (55%), neurology/psychiatry/pain (46%), cardiovascular (44%), and metabolic diseases (39%). The most frequent drug-induced toxicology issues confronted were hepatic, hematopoietic, and gastrointestinal. Toxicological effects that impacted the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) were most frequently based on histopathology findings. The survey comprised topics encountered in the use of biomarkers in nonclinical safety assessment, most commonly those used to assess inflammation, cardiac/vascular, renal, and hepatic toxicity as well as common practices related to the assessment of endocrine effects, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, juvenile and male-mediated developmental and female reproductive toxicity. The survey explored the impact of regulatory meetings on program design, application of the 3 Rs, and reasons for program delays. Overall, the survey results provide a broad perspective of current practices based on the experience of the scientific community engaged in nonclinical safety assessment.

The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) "Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems" (ICH Q10) guidance was introduced to address the growing gap between current good manufacturing practices and pharmaceutical manufacturing quality systems. This study evaluated the impact of the ICH Q10 guidance on the PQS of pharmaceutical manufacturers. Data were obtained from the enabler questionnaire from pharmaceutical manufacturers surveyed by the St. Gallen OPEX Benchmarking Program. These results represent the degree of implementation for enabler-focused questions based on a 5-point Likert scale self-assessment. Data analysis included a comparison of means and medians before and after the release of the ICH Q10 guidance and annual changes. There was a statistically significant difference for enabler implementation as a whole (p value < 0.0000), before and after the release of ICH Q10. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed for four of the five enabler categories (p values <0.05). In particular, the EMS enabler category showed a decrease in mean enabler score, suggesting the Management Responsibilities ICH Q10 PQS element was not effectively described or implemented. These results indicate that the release of ICH Q10 had a positive impact on the PQSs of pharmaceutical manufacturers. This was driven primarily by the changes observed in the TQM and JIT enabler categories and complimented by the TPM and BE categories. This would suggest that the Management Review, Change Management System, and Process Performance and Product Quality Monitoring System ICH Q10 PQS elements were all effectively described and implemented., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Aim: Since the MS/MS based detection of small-molecule drugs with poor or even no ion fragmentation is a challenge in bioanalysis, alternative MS/MS detection strategies were in focus of this study and applied in the field of forensic toxicology. Material & methods: Analyte quantification with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of problematic drugs was studied by the application of dimer adduct formation and valproic acid (VPA) was used as a model drug. VPA adduct ions could be identified during infusion experiments and the VPA dimer adduct ion was optimized for the detection. Conclusion: Dimer adduct ion formation can be used as an effective way of VPA quantification in human serum. Further, the parallel detection of dimer adduct ions with other adduct ion types can be stated as advantage in LC-MS/MS analysis of problematic drugs.

Recent changes in the pharmaceutical industry have led to significant paradigm shifts in the pharmaceutical quality environment. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, increasingly rapid development of novel therapies, and adoption of new manufacturing techniques have presented numerous challenges for the established regulatory framework and quality environment and are impacting the approaches utilized to ensure the quality of pharmaceutical products. Regulators, industry, and standards-setting organizations have begun to recognize the need to rely more on integrated risk-based approaches and to create more nimble and flexible standards to complement these efforts. They also increasingly have recognized that quality needs to be built into systems and processes throughout the lifecycle of the product. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 crisis has emphasized the need to adopt practices that better promote global supply chain resilience. In this paper, the USP Quality Advisory Group explores the various paradigm shifts currently impacting pharmaceutical quality and the approaches that are being taken to adapt to this new environment. Broad adoption of the Analytical Procedure Lifecycle approach, improved data management, and utilization of digital technologies are identified as potential solutions that can help meet the challenges of these quality paradigm shifts. Further discussion and collaboration among stakeholders are needed to pursue these and other solutions that can ensure a continued focus on quality while facilitating pharmaceutical innovation and development., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

In recent years, monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have become one of the most important classes of therapeutic proteins. Among many of the quality attributes monitored and controlled throughout therapeutic antibody development, particulate matter is one of the critical quality attributes (CQAs) for drug products. Visible and subvisible particulates in drug products may pose safety and immunogenicity risks to patients and therefore are tightly controlled and regulated. Characterization of the particle composition in drug products is essential to understand the origin of particulates and their mechanism of formation. In this study, we developed a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based method and integrated it into the typical particulate characterization workflow to identify and quantify the composition of proteinaceous particles isolated from a therapeutic mAb drug product. The LC-MS workflow provides a useful tool to study particle formation and monitor the protein composition of particulates during therapeutic mAb development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interest All authors were employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc while engaged in the study and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company. Patent applications based on this study were submitted., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Cost-effectiveness analysis of branded pharmaceuticals presumes that both cost (or price) and marginal effectiveness levels are exogenous. This assumption underlies most judgments of the cost-effectiveness of specific drugs. In this study, we show the theoretical implications of letting both factors be endogenous by modeling pharmaceutical price setting with and without health insurance, along with patient response to the prices that depend on marginal effectiveness. We then explore the implications of these models for cost-effectiveness ratios., Methods: We used simple textbook models of patient demand and pricing behavior of drug firms to predict market equilibria in the drug and insurance markets and to generate calculations of the cost-effectiveness ratios in those settings., Results: We found that ratios in market settings can be much different from those calculated in cost-effectiveness studies based on exogenous prices and treatment of all patients at risk rather than those who would demand treatment in a market setting. We also found that there may be considerable similarity in these market cost-effectiveness ratios across different products because drug firms with market power set profit-maximizing prices., Conclusions: We found that market cost-effectiveness ratios will always indicate an excess of benefits over cost. Insurance will lead to less favorable ratios than without insurance, but when insurers bargain with drug firms, rather than taking their prices as given, cost-effectiveness ratios will be more favorable., (Copyright © 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A cross-industry survey was conducted by EFPIA/IQ DruSafe in 2018 to provide information on photosafety evaluation of pharmaceuticals after implementation of ICH S10. This survey focused on the strategy utilized for photosafety risk assessment, the design of nonclinical (in vitro and in vivo) and clinical evaluations, the use of exposure margins in risk assessment, and regulatory interactions. The survey results indicated that a staged approach for phototoxicity assessment has been widely accepted by regulatory authorities globally. The OECD-based 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test is the most frequently used in vitro approach. Modifications to this assay suggested by ICH S10 are commonly applied. For in-vitro-positives, substantial margins from in vitro IC 50 values under irradiation to C max (clinical) have enabled further development without the need for additional photosafety data. In vivo phototoxicity studies typically involve dosing rodents and exposing skin and eyes to simulated sunlight, and subsequently evaluating at least the skin for erythema and edema. However, no formal guidelines exist and protocols are less standardized across companies. A margin-of-safety approach (based on C max at NOAEL) has been successfully applied to support clinical development. Experience with dedicated clinical phototoxicity studies was limited, perhaps due to effective de-risking approaches employed based on ICH S10., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Céline Caillet and co-authors discuss a Collection on use of portable devices for the evaluation of medicine quality and legitimacy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

In consideration of the recent ICH Quality Discussion Group (QDG) recommended revision to the ICH series of stability guidelines, the IQ Consortium (International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development) Science- and Risk-based Stability Working Group conducted a comprehensive review of ICH Q1A, Q1B, Q1C, Q1D, Q1E, and Q5C to identify areas where the guidelines could be clarified, updated, and amended to reflect the potential knowledge gained from current risk-based predictive stability tools and to consider other science- and risk-based stability strategies in accordance with ICH Q8-12. The recommendations propose a holistic approach to stability understanding, utilizing historical data, prior knowledge, modeling, and a risk assessment process to expand the concept of what could be included (or would be acceptable) in the core stability data package, including type and amount of stability evidence, assignment of retest period and shelf-life for a new product, and assessment of the impact of post-approval changes., (© 2021. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Objective: During fetal surgery, fetuses receive medication (atropine-fentanyl-curare) to prevent fetal pain, movement and bradycardia. Although essential there has been no detailed review of potential side effects. Herein we aimed to assess the effects of this medication cocktail on fetal brain development in a rabbit model., Methods: Pregnant does underwent laparotomy at 28 days of gestation. Two pups of each horn were randomized to an ultrasound guided injection with medication (atropine-cisatracurium-fentanyl, as clinically used) or saline (sham). The third pup was used as control. At term, does were delivered by cesarean. Outcome measures were neonatal biometry, neuromotoric functioning and neuro-histology (neuron density, synaptic density and proliferation)., Results: Maternal vital parameters remained stable during surgery. Fetal heart rates did not differ before and after injection, and were comparable for the three groups. At birth, neonatal body weights and brain-to-body weight ratios were also comparable. Both motor and sensory neurobehavioral scores were comparable. There were no differences in neuron density or proliferation. Sham pups, had a lower synaptic density in the hippocampus as compared to the medication group, however there was no difference in the other brain areas., Conclusion: In the rabbit model, fetal medication does not appear to lead to short-term neurocognitive effects., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Community hosted a virtual panel discussion on December 9, 2020, to provide a forum to discuss N-nitrosamine control strategies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The panel included staff from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and industry subject matter experts. Meeting topics included acceptable intake levels for nitrosamine impurities, definitions of "acceptable level of risk," water as a contributor in nitrosamine risk assessments, nitrosamine impurity control strategies based upon fate/purge data, early vs. late development assessment expectations, application to oncology programs developed under ICH S9, and Drug Master File (DMF) regulatory expectations. During the meeting, divergence in global health authority expectations was additionally discussed. One of the most important outputs from this AAPS panel discussion was the criticality of continued dialog between industry and health authorities to help understand actual versus perceived risks and provide pragmatic, scientifically justified solutions to ensure patients are provided with an uninterrupted supply of safe medicines based on globally harmonized requirements., (© 2021. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

The process of bringing a drug to market involves innumerable decisions to refine a concept into a final product. The final product goes through extensive research and development to meet the target product profile and to obtain a product that is manufacturable at scale. Historically, this process often feels inflexible and linear, as ideas and development paths are eliminated early on to allow focus on the workstream with the highest probability of success. Carrying multiple options early in development is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Similarly, changing development pathways after significant investment carries a high "penalty of change" (PoC), which makes pivoting to a new concept late in development inhibitory. Can drug product (DP) development be made more flexible? The authors believe that combining a nonlinear DP development approach, leveraging state-of-the art data sciences, and using emerging process and measurement technologies will offer enhanced flexibility and should become the new normal. Through the use of iterative DP evaluation, "smart" clinical studies, artificial intelligence, novel characterization techniques, automation, and data collection/modeling/interpretation, it should be possible to significantly reduce the PoC during development. In this Perspective, a review of ideas/techniques along with supporting technologies that can be applied at each stage of DP development is shared. It is further discussed how these contribute to an improved and flexible DP development through the acceleration of the iterative build-measure-learn cycle in laboratories and clinical trials.

In 2017, health and social care organizations contributed 6.3% of carbon emissions in England. Efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of the National Health Service (NHS) have been broadly focused on reducing demand, through prevention and patient empowerment, and modifying supply side factors by focusing on lean care systems and low carbon alternatives. This narrative review concentrates on supply side factors to identify sustainable practices with a focus on actions that could be implemented in dermatology departments. For this study, a literature review was conducted In MEDLINE in April 2020. The search terms included 'environmental sustainability' and 'climate change' with 'dermatology', 'telemedicine', 'NHS', 'surgery' and 'operating theatres'. Out of 95 results, 20 were deemed relevant to the review. Although the review showed that there is clearly growing interest in environmental sustainability, the identified literature lacked examples of comprehensive implementation and evaluation of initiatives. The literature discussed distinct areas including transport, waste management and procurement as part of a lean healthcare system. A number of papers highlighted the potential contribution of carbon-reducing actions without citing verifiable outcome data. This narrative review highlights the need for detailed environmental impact assessments of treatment options in dermatology, in tandem with economic analysis. In conclusion, we have identified a clear need for evidence-based guidance setting out implementable actions with identifiable benefits achievable within local clinical teams. This will require engagement between clinicians, patients and healthcare organizations., (© 2020 British Association of Dermatologists.)

We identified the major points that are described in the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E17 guideline but have not been considered in the past multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) used for drug approval in Japan to elucidate potential challenges in the implementation of the ICH E17 guideline in Japan. Based on the analysis of 167 MRCTs of 130 drugs, several points, such as the same dose setting and consistency between the overall and Japanese populations, in addition to good clinical practice compliance, have been well considered in ≥ 75% of MRCTs. In contrast, the use of relevant guidelines for disease and primary end point definitions, standardization of efficacy/safety information, sample size allocation, as well as training/validation on subject selection and primary end point, have been addressed less adequately and may need to be considered when planning future MRCTs. This study provides useful information for the implementation of the ICH E17 guideline in Japan., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Objectives: The use of drugs beyond their marketing authorisation, that is, off-label use, is common practice in palliative care with over 70% of off-label use having little or no scientific support. The lack of evidence makes recommendations for off-label use essential, in order to increase the safety of drug therapy and thus patient safety. The aim of this study was to develop a guide for preparing and consenting drug-specific recommendations for off-label use in palliative care., Methods: Group Delphi Study with three rounds and a prior online survey to identify topics of dissent. Participants represented professional groups working in palliative care involved in direct patient care and/or drug management and various care settings. Furthermore, representatives of relevant professional associations, experts with academic, non-clinical background and experts with international expertise were invited., Results: 18/20 invited professionals participated in the prior online-survey. 15 experts participated in the Group Delphi process. Six domains, including identification of drugs, drug uses, assessment of evidence, formulation, consensus and updating of recommendations were generated and respective statements were included in the Group Delphi process. The consensus process resulted in 28 statements forming the guide for recommendations., Conclusions: The resultant systematic approach for preparing and consenting drug-specific recommendations for off-label use will allow the development of recommendations with transparent and reproducible monographs. This will help to increase treatment quality and patient safety as well as security of decision-making in palliative care. The developed guide is part of a larger project aiming to provide therapy recommendations for areas that have little or no scientific evidence., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Since 2011, pharmaceutical companies in Japan have been required to issue two types of documents regarding severe adverse drug reactions reported post-marketing, namely the Rapid Safety Communication Materials for Patients and the Related Materials. However, the adequacy of these documents has not yet been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of these two types of materials. The Rapid Safety Communications for Patients were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website. The Related Materials were obtained from pharmaceutical companies or the PMDA website. Three assessors independently scored the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and the Related Materials using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI). In addition, the contents and descriptions of the materials were analyzed. In total, 13 materials for seven drugs were assessed. Almost all materials contained the "main message" and "call to action". However, the average CCI scores for the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and Related Materials for Patients were 68.8 and 74.3 (out of 100), respectively. Further, none of the evaluated materials were scored above the CCI threshold score (i.e., ≥ 90%). Descriptions regarding "language", "state of science", and "risk" were not adequate. In particular, the terminology used in materials seemed difficult for patients to understand. In conclusion, the Japanese Rapid Communication Materials for Patients require improvement. Furthermore, a system for evaluating these materials prior to publication should be established.

A workshop entitled "Deriving Compound-Specific Exposure Limits for Chemicals Used in Pharmaceutical Synthesis" was held at the 2018 Genetic Toxicology Association annual meeting. The objectives of the workshop were to provide an educational forum and use case studies and live multiple-choice polling to establish the degree of similarity/diversity in approach/opinion of the industry experts and other delegates present for some of the more challenging decision points that need to be considered when developing a compound-specific exposure limit (ie, acceptable intake or permissible or permitted daily exposure). Herein we summarize the relevant background and case study information for each decision point topic presented as well as highlight significant polling responses and discussion points. A common observation throughout was the requirement for expert judgment to be applied at each of the decision points presented which often results in different reasoning being applied by the risk assessor when deriving a compound-specific exposure limit. This supports the value of precompetitive cross-industry collaborations to develop compound-specific limits and harmonize the methodology applied, thus reducing the associated uncertainty inherent in the application of isolated expert judgment in this context. An overview of relevant precompetitive cross-industry collaborations working to achieve this goal is described.

Background: Drug information resources are commonly used by health-care providers answering pregnancy-related medication questions. In 2015, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a new pregnancy and lactation medication labeling content and format, removing the pregnancy category, and using a narrative. Despite labeling requirements changing, it is unknown if drug information resources updated monographs to reflect these changes., Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate if commonly used drug information resources provide pregnancy information listed similar to the requirements of the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR). Secondary analyses included evaluating the references and inclusion of the pregnancy category rating., Methods: Pregnancy recommendations for 23 medications were evaluated in 9 drug information resources (Clinical Pharmacology, Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation , Epocrates®, First Databank, LexiComp® Online, LexiComp® Online Pregnancy & Lactation, In-Depth, Medi-Span®, Micromedex®, and Multum®). The number of references per drug monograph and most recent reference publication year was obtained., Results: LexiComp® Online Pregnancy & Lactation, In-Depth mimics the new PLLR structure and consistently had the highest number of and most recent references when the medication was included. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation was the next most similar in content with the PLLR and second in most references per monograph; however, the most recent reference was the textbook publication year., Conclusion and Relevance: LexiComp® Online Pregnancy & Lactation, In-Depth and Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation provided pregnancy information in a format most similar to the PLLR. However, several drug information resources contained pregnancy categories ratings that were to be removed from medication labeling per the PLLR.

In 2020 The United States Food and Drug Administration?s (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) approved 53 novel drugs, five more than in 2019, but still an aggressive number when compared with 2015 when only 45 new drugs were released to the market. CDER, the largest department within the FDA, has robustly approved a rising number of generic drugs in the last several years, increasing their accessibility and reducing patient and payor costs.