Search

Your search keyword '"Pharoah, P"' showing total 2,006 results
Start Over Author "Pharoah, P"
2,006 results on '"Pharoah, P"'

1. Racial and ethnic differences in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: an analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Author

Meagher, Nicola S, White, Kami K, Wilkens, Lynne R, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Carney, Michael E, Cramer, Daniel W, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Jordan, Susan, Kaufmann, Scott H, Le, Nhu D, Pike, Malcolm C, Riggan, Marjorie, Qin, Bo, Rothstein, Joseph H, Titus, Linda, Winham, Stacey J, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goode, Ellen L, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Risch, Harvey A, Webb, Penelope M, Cook, Linda S, Goodman, Marc T, Harris, Holly R, Le Marchand, Loic, McGuire, Valerie, Pharoah, Paul DP, Sarink, Danja, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sieh, Weiva, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Whittemore, Alice S, Wu, Anna H, Peres, Lauren C, and Merritt, Melissa A

Subjects
Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Minority Health, Prevention, Women's Health, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Risk Factors, Adult, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Case-Control Studies, Aged, Sterilization, Tubal, Parity, Asian, White People, Hispanic or Latino, United States, Contraceptives, Oral, Logistic Models, Smoking, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ethnicity, Odds Ratio, ovarian cancer, risk factors, race, ethnicity, Mathematical Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract

Limited estimates exist on risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in Asian, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander women. Participants in this study included 1734 Asian (n = 785 case and 949 control participants), 266 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 99 case and 167 control participants), 1149 Hispanic (n = 505 case and 644 control participants), and 24 189 White (n = 9981 case and 14 208 control participants) from 11 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for risk associations by race and ethnicity. Heterogeneity in EOC risk associations by race and ethnicity (P ≤ .02) was observed for oral contraceptive (OC) use, parity, tubal ligation, and smoking. We observed inverse associations with EOC risk for OC use and parity across all groups; associations were strongest in Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Asian women. The inverse association for tubal ligation with risk was most pronounced for Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander participants (odds ratio (OR) = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.48) compared with Asian and White participants (OR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.51-0.90] and OR = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.85], respectively). Differences in EOC risk factor associations were observed across racial and ethnic groups, which could be due, in part, to varying prevalence of EOC histotypes. Inclusion of greater diversity in future studies is essential to inform prevention strategies. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancers.

Published
2024

2. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma

Author

Saner, Flurina AM, Takahashi, Kazuaki, Budden, Timothy, Pandey, Ahwan, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Zwimpfer, Tibor A, Meagher, Nicola S, Fereday, Sian, Twomey, Laura, Pishas, Kathleen I, Hoang, Therese, Bolithon, Adelyn, Traficante, Nadia, Group, for the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Alsop, Kathryn, Christie, Elizabeth L, Kang, Eun-Young, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Alsop, Jennifer, Beckmann, Matthias W, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Coulson, Penny, Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, El-Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kluz, Tomasz, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kristjansdottir, Björg, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Mateoiu, Constantina, Orsulic, Sandra, Ruebner, Matthias, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Sherman, Mark E, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Soong, T Rinda, Steed, Helen, Sukumvanich, Paniti, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Widschwendter, Martin, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Anglesio, Michael S, Berchuck, Andrew, Brenton, James D, Campbell, Ian, Cook, Linda S, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, Fortner, Renée T, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sundfeldt, Karin, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Goode, Ellen L, DeFazio, Anna, Köbel, Martin, Ramus, Susan J, Bowtell, David DL, and Garsed, Dale W

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Genetics, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Orphan Drug, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Precision Medicine, Human Genome, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, BRCA2 Protein, BRCA1 Protein, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins, Prognosis, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Neoplasm Grading, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Middle Aged, Germ-Line Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).Experimental designRB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss.ResultsRB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1.ConclusionsCo-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.

Published
2024

4. Genome-wide association analyses of ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery identify candidate genes for residual disease

Author

Ramachandran, Dhanya, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kommoss, Stefan, DeFazio, Anna, Riggan, Marjorie J, Webb, Penelope M, Fasching, Peter A, Lambrechts, Diether, García, María J, Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina, Goodman, Marc T, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Høgdall, Estrid, Goode, Ellen L, Cliby, William A, Kumar, Amanika, Wang, Chen, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Titus, Linda, Bjorge, Line, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Pejovic, Tanja, Høgdall, Claus K, McNeish, Iain A, May, Taymaa, Huntsman, David G, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Canzler, Ulrich, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Schröder, Willibald, Belau, Antje, Hanker, Lars, Harter, Philipp, Sehouli, Jalid, Kimmig, Rainer, de Gregorio, Nikolaus, Schmalfeldt, Barbara, Baumann, Klaus, Hilpert, Felix, Burges, Alexander, Winterhoff, Boris, Schürmann, Peter, Speith, Lisa-Marie, Hillemanns, Peter, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Ramus, Susan J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dörk, Thilo, and Heitz, Florian

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Cancer, Prevention, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Orphan Drug, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, AOCS Group, OPAL Study Group, Medical biotechnology
Abstract

Survival from ovarian cancer depends on the resection status after primary surgery. We performed genome-wide association analyses for resection status of 7705 ovarian cancer patients, including 4954 with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), to identify variants associated with residual disease. The most significant association with resection status was observed for rs72845444, upstream of MGMT, in HGSOC (p = 3.9 × 10-8). In gene-based analyses, PPP2R5C was the most strongly associated gene in HGSOC after stage adjustment. In an independent set of 378 ovarian tumours from the AGO-OVAR 11 study, variants near MGMT and PPP2R5C correlated with methylation and transcript levels, and PPP2R5C mRNA levels predicted progression-free survival in patients with residual disease. MGMT encodes a DNA repair enzyme, and PPP2R5C encodes the B56γ subunit of the PP2A tumour suppressor. Our results link heritable variation at these two loci with resection status in HGSOC.

Published
2024

5. Germline copy number variants and endometrial cancer risk

Author

Stylianou, Cassie E., Wiggins, George A. R., Lau, Vanessa L., Dennis, Joe, Shelling, Andrew N., Wilson, Michelle, Sykes, Peter, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, De Wispelaere, Wout, Easton, Douglas F., Fasching, Peter A., Glubb, Dylan M., Goode, Ellen L., Lambrechts, Diether, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Scott, Rodney J., Tham, Emma, Tomlinson, Ian, Bolla, Manjeet K., Couch, Fergus J., Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M., Fletcher, Olivia, García-Closas, Montserrat, Hoppe, Reiner, Jernström, Helena, Kaaks, Rudolf, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Obi, Nadia, Southey, Melissa C., Stone, Jennifer, Wang, Qin, Spurdle, Amanda B., O’Mara, Tracy A., Pearson, John, and Walker, Logan C.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Understanding the genetic complexity of puberty timing across the allele frequency spectrum

Author

Kentistou, Katherine A., Kaisinger, Lena R., Stankovic, Stasa, Vaudel, Marc, Mendes de Oliveira, Edson, Messina, Andrea, Walters, Robin G., Liu, Xiaoxi, Busch, Alexander S., Helgason, Hannes, Thompson, Deborah J., Santoni, Federico, Petricek, Konstantin M., Zouaghi, Yassine, Huang-Doran, Isabel, Gudbjartsson, Daniel F., Bratland, Eirik, Lin, Kuang, Gardner, Eugene J., Zhao, Yajie, Jia, Raina Y., Terao, Chikashi, Riggan, Marjorie J., Bolla, Manjeet K., Yazdanpanah, Mojgan, Yazdanpanah, Nahid, Bradfield, Jonathan P., Broer, Linda, Campbell, Archie, Chasman, Daniel I., Cousminer, Diana L., Franceschini, Nora, Franke, Lude H., Girotto, Giorgia, He, Chunyan, Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Joshi, Peter K., Kamatani, Yoichiro, Karlsson, Robert, Luan, Jian’an, Lunetta, Kathryn L., Mägi, Reedik, Mangino, Massimo, Medland, Sarah E., Meisinger, Christa, Noordam, Raymond, Nutile, Teresa, Concas, Maria Pina, Polašek, Ozren, Porcu, Eleonora, Ring, Susan M., Sala, Cinzia, Smith, Albert V., Tanaka, Toshiko, van der Most, Peter J., Vitart, Veronique, Wang, Carol A., Willemsen, Gonneke, Zygmunt, Marek, Ahearn, Thomas U., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C., Auer, Paul L., Barnes, Catriona L. K., Beckmann, Matthias W., Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Stig E., Brenner, Hermann, Buring, Julie E., Canzian, Federico, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J., Cox, Angela, Crisponi, Laura, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Demerath, Ellen W., Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, De Vivo, Immaculata, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M., Dwek, Miriam, Eriksson, Johan G., Fasching, Peter A., Fernandez-Rhodes, Lindsay, Ferreli, Liana, Fletcher, Olivia, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A., González-Neira, Anna, Grallert, Harald, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A., Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hakonarson, Hakon, Hart, Roger J., Hickey, Martha, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L., Hottenga, Jouke-Jan, Hu, Frank B., Huebner, Hanna, Hunter, David J., Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M., Karasik, David, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Kristensen, Vessela N., Lacey, James V., Lambrechts, Diether, Launer, Lenore J., Lind, Penelope A., Lindblom, Annika, Magnusson, Patrik K. E., Mannermaa, Arto, McCarthy, Mark I., Meitinger, Thomas, Menni, Cristina, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Millwood, Iona Y., Milne, Roger L., Montgomery, Grant W., Nevanlinna, Heli, Nolte, Ilja M., Nyholt, Dale R., Obi, Nadia, O’Brien, Katie M., Offit, Kenneth, Oldehinkel, Albertine J., Ostrowski, Sisse R., Palotie, Aarno, Pedersen, Ole B., Peters, Annette, Pianigiani, Giulia, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pouta, Anneli, Pozarickij, Alfred, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rosendaal, Frits R., Ruggiero, Daniela, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P., Schipf, Sabine, Schmidt, Carsten O., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Small, Kerrin, Spedicati, Beatrice, Stampfer, Meir, Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M., Teras, Lauren R., Tikkanen, Emmi, Turman, Constance, Vachon, Celine M., Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Zemel, Babette S., Zheng, Wei, van Dijk, Ko W., Alizadeh, Behrooz Z., Bandinelli, Stefania, Boerwinkle, Eric, Boomsma, Dorret I., Ciullo, Marina, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cucca, Francesco, Esko, Tõnu, Gieger, Christian, Grant, Struan F. A., Gudnason, Vilmundur, Hayward, Caroline, Kolčić, Ivana, Kraft, Peter, Lawlor, Deborah A., Martin, Nicholas G., Nøhr, Ellen A., Pedersen, Nancy L., Pennell, Craig E., Ridker, Paul M., Robino, Antonietta, Snieder, Harold, Sovio, Ulla, Spector, Tim D., Stöckl, Doris, Sudlow, Cathie, Timpson, Nic J., Toniolo, Daniela, Uitterlinden, André, Ulivi, Sheila, Völzke, Henry, Wareham, Nicholas J., Widen, Elisabeth, Wilson, James F., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Li, Liming, Easton, Douglas F., Njølstad, Pål R., Sulem, Patrick, Murabito, Joanne M., Murray, Anna, Manousaki, Despoina, Juul, Anders, Erikstrup, Christian, Stefansson, Kari, Horikoshi, Momoko, Chen, Zhengming, Farooqi, I. Sadaf, Pitteloud, Nelly, Johansson, Stefan, Day, Felix R., Perry, John R. B., and Ong, Ken K.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Improving on polygenic scores across complex traits using select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) and LDpred2

Author

Jonathan P. Tyrer, Pei-Chen Peng, Amber A. DeVries, Simon A. Gayther, Michelle R. Jones, and Paul D. Pharoah

Subjects
Polygenic scores, Genome-wide association study (GWAS), Cross-ancestry, Multiple phenotypes, Biotechnology, TP248.13-248.65, Genetics, QH426-470
Abstract

Abstract Background As precision medicine advances, polygenic scores (PGS) have become increasingly important for clinical risk assessment. Many methods have been developed to create polygenic models with increased accuracy for risk prediction. Our select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) PGS method has previously been shown to accurately predict the polygenic risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Here, we applied S4 PGS to 12 phenotypes for UK Biobank participants, and compared it with the LDpred2 and a combined S4 + LDpred2 method. Results The S4 + LDpred2 method provided overall improved PGS accuracy across a variety of phenotypes for UK Biobank participants. Additionally, the S4 + LDpred2 method had the best estimated PGS accuracy in Finnish and Japanese populations. We also addressed the challenge of limited genotype level data by developing the PGS models using only GWAS summary statistics. Conclusions Taken together, the S4 + LDpred2 method represents an improvement in overall PGS accuracy across multiple phenotypes and populations.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. A framework for assessing interactions for risk stratification models: the example of ovarian cancer

Author

Phung, Minh Tung, Lee, Alice W, McLean, Karen, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Carney, Michael E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cramer, Daniel W, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Fortner, Renee T, Goodman, Marc T, Harris, Holly R, Jensen, Allan, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Pharoah, Paul DP, Qin, Bo, Terry, Kathryn L, Titus, Linda J, Webb, Penelope M, Wu, Anna H, Zeinomar, Nur, Ziogas, Argyrios, Berchuck, Andrew, Cho, Kathleen R, Hanley, Gillian E, Meza, Rafael, Mukherjee, Bhramar, Pike, Malcolm C, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, and Trabert, Britton

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Women's Health, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 2.5 Research design and methodologies (aetiology), Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Case-Control Studies, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

Generally, risk stratification models for cancer use effect estimates from risk/protective factor analyses that have not assessed potential interactions between these exposures. We have developed a 4-criterion framework for assessing interactions that includes statistical, qualitative, biological, and practical approaches. We present the application of this framework in an ovarian cancer setting because this is an important step in developing more accurate risk stratification models. Using data from 9 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of interactions among 15 unequivocal risk and protective factors for ovarian cancer (including 14 non-genetic factors and a 36-variant polygenic score) with age and menopausal status. Pairwise interactions between the risk/protective factors were also assessed. We found that menopausal status modifies the association among endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, breastfeeding, and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and disease risk, highlighting the importance of understanding multiplicative interactions when developing risk prediction models.

Published
2023

10. Fine-mapping analysis including over 254,000 East Asian and European descendants identifies 136 putative colorectal cancer susceptibility genes

Author

Chen, Zhishan, Guo, Xingyi, Tao, Ran, Huyghe, Jeroen R., Law, Philip J., Fernandez-Rozadilla, Ceres, Ping, Jie, Jia, Guochong, Long, Jirong, Li, Chao, Shen, Quanhu, Xie, Yuhan, Timofeeva, Maria N., Thomas, Minta, Schmit, Stephanie L., Díez-Obrero, Virginia, Devall, Matthew, Moratalla-Navarro, Ferran, Fernandez-Tajes, Juan, Palles, Claire, Sherwood, Kitty, Briggs, Sarah E. W., Svinti, Victoria, Donnelly, Kevin, Farrington, Susan M., Blackmur, James, Vaughan-Shaw, Peter G., Shu, Xiao-Ou, Lu, Yingchang, Broderick, Peter, Studd, James, Harrison, Tabitha A., Conti, David V., Schumacher, Fredrick R., Melas, Marilena, Rennert, Gad, Obón-Santacana, Mireia, Martín-Sánchez, Vicente, Oh, Jae Hwan, Kim, Jeongseon, Jee, Sun Ha, Jung, Keum Ji, Kweon, Sun-Seog, Shin, Min-Ho, Shin, Aesun, Ahn, Yoon-Ok, Kim, Dong-Hyun, Oze, Isao, Wen, Wanqing, Matsuo, Keitaro, Matsuda, Koichi, Tanikawa, Chizu, Ren, Zefang, Gao, Yu-Tang, Jia, Wei-Hua, Hopper, John L., Jenkins, Mark A., Win, Aung Ko, Pai, Rish K., Figueiredo, Jane C., Haile, Robert W., Gallinger, Steven, Woods, Michael O., Newcomb, Polly A., Duggan, David, Cheadle, Jeremy P., Kaplan, Richard, Kerr, Rachel, Kerr, David, Kirac, Iva, Böhm, Jan, Mecklin, Jukka-Pekka, Jousilahti, Pekka, Knekt, Paul, Aaltonen, Lauri A., Rissanen, Harri, Pukkala, Eero, Eriksson, Johan G., Cajuso, Tatiana, Hänninen, Ulrika, Kondelin, Johanna, Palin, Kimmo, Tanskanen, Tomas, Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura, Männistö, Satu, Albanes, Demetrius, Weinstein, Stephanie J., Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward, Palmer, Julie R., Buchanan, Daniel D., Platz, Elizabeth A., Visvanathan, Kala, Ulrich, Cornelia M., Siegel, Erin, Brezina, Stefanie, Gsur, Andrea, Campbell, Peter T., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Hoffmeister, Michael, Brenner, Hermann, Slattery, Martha L., Potter, John D., Tsilidis, Kostas K., Schulze, Matthias B., Gunter, Marc J., Murphy, Neil, Castells, Antoni, Castellví-Bel, Sergi, Moreira, Leticia, Arndt, Volker, Shcherbina, Anna, Bishop, D. Timothy, Giles, Graham G., Southey, Melissa C., Idos, Gregory E., McDonnell, Kevin J., Abu-Ful, Zomoroda, Greenson, Joel K., Shulman, Katerina, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Offit, Kenneth, Su, Yu-Ru, Steinfelder, Robert, Keku, Temitope O., van Guelpen, Bethany, Hudson, Thomas J., Hampel, Heather, Pearlman, Rachel, Berndt, Sonja I., Hayes, Richard B., Martinez, Marie Elena, Thomas, Sushma S., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Larsson, Susanna C., Yen, Yun, Lenz, Heinz-Josef, White, Emily, Li, Li, Doheny, Kimberly F., Pugh, Elizabeth, Shelford, Tameka, Chan, Andrew T., Cruz-Correa, Marcia, Lindblom, Annika, Hunter, David J., Joshi, Amit D., Schafmayer, Clemens, Scacheri, Peter C., Kundaje, Anshul, Schoen, Robert E., Hampe, Jochen, Stadler, Zsofia K., Vodicka, Pavel, Vodickova, Ludmila, Vymetalkova, Veronika, Edlund, Christopher K., Gauderman, W. James, Shibata, David, Toland, Amanda, Markowitz, Sanford, Kim, Andre, Chanock, Stephen J., van Duijnhoven, Franzel, Feskens, Edith J. M., Sakoda, Lori C., Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Wolk, Alicja, Pardini, Barbara, FitzGerald, Liesel M., Lee, Soo Chin, Ogino, Shuji, Bien, Stephanie A., Kooperberg, Charles, Li, Christopher I., Lin, Yi, Prentice, Ross, Qu, Conghui, Bézieau, Stéphane, Yamaji, Taiki, Sawada, Norie, Iwasaki, Motoki, Le Marchand, Loic, Wu, Anna H., Qu, Chenxu, McNeil, Caroline E., Coetzee, Gerhard, Hayward, Caroline, Deary, Ian J., Harris, Sarah E., Theodoratou, Evropi, Reid, Stuart, Walker, Marion, Ooi, Li Yin, Lau, Ken S., Zhao, Hongyu, Hsu, Li, Cai, Qiuyin, Dunlop, Malcolm G., Gruber, Stephen B., Houlston, Richard S., Moreno, Victor, Casey, Graham, Peters, Ulrike, Tomlinson, Ian, and Zheng, Wei

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Allometric versus traditional body-shape indices and risk of colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Author

Rontogianni, Marina O., Bouras, Emmanouil, Aglago, Elom Kouassivi, Freisling, Heinz, Murphy, Neil, Cotterchio, Michelle, Hampe, Jochen, Lindblom, Annika, Pai, Rish K., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Phipps, Amanda I., van Duijnhoven, Franzel J. B., Visvanathan, Kala, van Guelpen, Bethany, Li, Christopher I., Brenner, Hermann, Pellatt, Andrew J., Ogino, Shuji, Gunter, Marc J., Peters, Ulrike, Christakoudi, Sofia, and Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Ovarian cancer pathology characteristics as predictors of variant pathogenicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Author

O’Mahony, Denise G, Ramus, Susan J, Southey, Melissa C, Meagher, Nicola S, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, John, Esther M, Hamann, Ute, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Andrulis, Irene L, Sharma, Priyanka, Daly, Mary B, Hake, Christopher R, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Jakubowska, Anna, Godwin, Andrew K, Arason, Adalgeir, Bane, Anita, Simard, Jacques, Soucy, Penny, Caligo, Maria A, Mai, Phuong L, Claes, Kathleen BM, Teixeira, Manuel R, Chung, Wendy K, Lazaro, Conxi, Hulick, Peter J, Toland, Amanda E, Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Neuhausen, Susan L, Vega, Ana, de la Hoya, Miguel, Nevanlinna, Heli, Dhawan, Mallika, Zampiga, Valentina, Danesi, Rita, Varesco, Liliana, Gismondi, Viviana, Vellone, Valerio Gaetano, James, Paul A, Janavicius, Ramunas, Nikitina-Zake, Liene, Nielsen, Finn Cilius, van Overeem Hansen, Thomas, Pejovic, Tanja, Borg, Ake, Rantala, Johanna, Offit, Kenneth, Montagna, Marco, Nathanson, Katherine L, Domchek, Susan M, Osorio, Ana, García, María J, Karlan, Beth Y, De Fazio, Anna, Bowtell, David, McGuffog, Lesley, Leslie, Goska, Parsons, Michael T, Dörk, Thilo, Speith, Lisa-Marie, dos Santos, Elizabeth Santana, da Costa, Alexandre André BA, Radice, Paolo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Papi, Laura, Engel, Christoph, Hahnen, Eric, Schmutzler, Rita K, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Easton, Douglas F, Tischkowitz, Marc, Singer, Christian F, Tan, Yen Yen, Whittemore, Alice S, Sieh, Weiva, Brenton, James D, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Fostira, Florentia, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Soukupova, Jana, Vocka, Michal, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Antoniou, Antonis C, Goldgar, David E, Spurdle, Amanda B, and Michailidou, Kyriaki

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Female, Virulence, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Neoplasms, HEBON Investigators, GEMO Study Collaborators, AOCS Group, CZECANCA Consortium, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2, Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundThe distribution of ovarian tumour characteristics differs between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers. In this study, we assessed the utility of ovarian tumour characteristics as predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity, for application using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification system.MethodsData for 10,373 ovarian cancer cases, including carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants, were collected from unpublished international cohorts and consortia and published studies. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the association of ovarian cancer histology and other characteristics, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Estimates were aligned to ACMG/AMP code strengths (supporting, moderate, strong).ResultsNo histological subtype provided informative ACMG/AMP evidence in favour of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Evidence against variant pathogenicity was estimated for the mucinous and clear cell histologies (supporting) and borderline cases (moderate). Refined associations are provided according to tumour grade, invasion and age at diagnosis.ConclusionsWe provide detailed estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity based on ovarian tumour characteristics. This evidence can be combined with other variant information under the ACMG/AMP classification system, to improve classification and carrier clinical management.

Published
2023

15. Genome-wide analyses characterize shared heritability among cancers and identify novel cancer susceptibility regions

Author

Lindström, Sara, Wang, Lu, Feng, Helian, Majumdar, Arunabha, Huo, Sijia, Macdonald, James, Harrison, Tabitha, Turman, Constance, Chen, Hongjie, Mancuso, Nicholas, Bammler, Theo, Consortium, Breast Cancer Association, Gallinger, Steve, Gruber, Stephen B, Gunter, Marc J, Le Marchand, Loic, Moreno, Victor, Offit, Kenneth, Study, Genetics And Epidemiology Of Colorectal Cancer Consortium Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study Colon Cancer Family Registry, De Vivo, Immaculata, O’Mara, Tracy A, Spurdle, Amanda B, Tomlinson, Ian, Consortium, Endometrial Cancer Association, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Gharahkhani, Puya, Gockel, Ines, Jankowski, Janusz, Macgregor, Stuart, Schumacher, Johannes, Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill, Bondy, Melissa L, Houlston, Richard S, Jenkins, Robert B, Melin, Beatrice, Wrensch, Margaret, Brennan, Paul, Christiani, David C, Johansson, Mattias, Mckay, James, Aldrich, Melinda C, Amos, Christopher I, Landi, Maria Teresa, Tardon, Adonina, Consortium, International Lung Cancer, Bishop, D Timothy, Demenais, Florence, Goldstein, Alisa M, Iles, Mark M, Kanetsky, Peter A, Law, Matthew H, Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association, Amundadottir, Laufey T, Stolzenberg-Solomon, Rachael, Wolpin, Brian M, Consortium, Pancreatic Cancer Cohort, Klein, Alison, Petersen, Gloria, Risch, Harvey, Consortium, The PRACTICAL Consortium Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control, Chanock, Stephen J, Purdue, Mark P, Scelo, Ghislaine, Pharoah, Paul, Kar, Siddhartha, Hung, Rayjean J, Pasaniuc, Bogdan, and Kraft, Peter

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Genetics, Digestive Diseases, Prevention, Clinical Research, Urologic Diseases, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Male, Humans, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Transcriptome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study (CORECT), Colon Cancer Family Registry Study (CCFR), Genetics And Epidemiology Of Colorectal Cancer Consortium, Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium, International Lung Cancer Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium, Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (Panc4), The PRACTICAL Consortium, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundThe shared inherited genetic contribution to risk of different cancers is not fully known. In this study, we leverage results from 12 cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to quantify pairwise genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers and identify novel cancer susceptibility loci.MethodsWe collected GWAS summary statistics for 12 solid cancers based on 376 759 participants with cancer and 532 864 participants without cancer of European ancestry. The included cancer types were breast, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, glioma, head and neck, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and renal cancers. We conducted cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies to discover novel cancer susceptibility loci. Finally, we assessed the extent of variant-specific pleiotropy among cancers at known and newly identified cancer susceptibility loci.ResultsWe observed widespread but modest genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers. In cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies, we identified 15 novel cancer susceptibility loci. Additionally, we identified multiple variants at 77 distinct loci with strong evidence of being associated with at least 2 cancer types by testing for pleiotropy at known cancer susceptibility loci.ConclusionsOverall, these results suggest that some genetic risk variants are shared among cancers, though much of cancer heritability is cancer-specific and thus tissue-specific. The increase in statistical power associated with larger sample sizes in cross-disease analysis allows for the identification of novel susceptibility regions. Future studies incorporating data on multiple cancer types are likely to identify additional regions associated with the risk of multiple cancer types.

Published
2023

16. Associations of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score With Tumor Characteristics and Survival

Author

Lopes Cardozo, Josephine MN, Andrulis, Irene L, Bojesen, Stig E, Dörk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A, Hooning, Maartje J, Keeman, Renske, Nevanlinna, Heli, Rutgers, Emiel JT, Easton, Douglas F, Hall, Per, Pharoah, Paul DP, van 't Veer, Laura J, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Ahearn, Thomas U, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Auer, Paul L, Augustinsson, Annelie, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Boyle, Terry, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Camp, Nicola J, Canzian, Federico, Cardoso, Fatima, Castelao, Jose E, Cessna, Melissa H, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Colonna, Sarah V, Copson, Ellen, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Drukker, Caroline A, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Genkinger, Jeanine, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Houlston, Richard S, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Ito, Hidemi, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M, Johnson, Nichola, Jones, Michael E, Joseph, Vijai, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, and Koutros, Stella

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Breast, Breast Cancer Association Consortium and MINDACT Collaborators, Clinical Sciences, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeA polygenic risk score (PRS) consisting of 313 common genetic variants (PRS313) is associated with risk of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the PRS313 with clinicopathologic characteristics of, and survival following, breast cancer.MethodsWomen with invasive breast cancer were included, 98,397 of European ancestry and 12,920 of Asian ancestry, from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and 683 women from the European MINDACT trial. Associations between PRS313 and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the 70-gene signature for MINDACT, were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Associations of PRS313 (continuous, per standard deviation) with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated with Cox regression, adjusted for clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment.ResultsThe PRS313 was associated with more favorable tumor characteristics. In BCAC, increasing PRS313 was associated with lower grade, hormone receptor-positive status, and smaller tumor size. In MINDACT, PRS313 was associated with a low risk 70-gene signature. In European women from BCAC, higher PRS313 was associated with better OS and BCSS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.98), but the association disappeared after adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics (and treatment): OS HR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) and BCSS HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.07). The results in MINDACT and Asian women from BCAC were consistent.ConclusionAn increased PRS313 is associated with favorable tumor characteristics, but is not independently associated with prognosis. Thus, PRS313 has no role in the clinical management of primary breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Nevertheless, breast cancer mortality rates will be higher for women with higher PRS313 as increasing PRS313 is associated with an increased risk of disease. This information is crucial for modeling effective stratified screening programs.

Published
2023

17. Publisher Correction: Understanding the genetic complexity of puberty timing across the allele frequency spectrum

Author

Kentistou, Katherine A., Kaisinger, Lena R., Stankovic, Stasa, Vaudel, Marc, Mendes de Oliveira, Edson, Messina, Andrea, Walters, Robin G., Liu, Xiaoxi, Busch, Alexander S., Helgason, Hannes, Thompson, Deborah J., Santoni, Federico, Petricek, Konstantin M., Zouaghi, Yassine, Huang-Doran, Isabel, Gudbjartsson, Daniel F., Bratland, Eirik, Lin, Kuang, Gardner, Eugene J., Zhao, Yajie, Jia, Raina Y., Terao, Chikashi, Riggan, Marjorie J., Bolla, Manjeet K., Yazdanpanah, Mojgan, Yazdanpanah, Nahid, Bradfield, Jonathan P., Broer, Linda, Campbell, Archie, Chasman, Daniel I., Cousminer, Diana L., Franceschini, Nora, Franke, Lude H., Girotto, Giorgia, He, Chunyan, Järvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Joshi, Peter K., Kamatani, Yoichiro, Karlsson, Robert, Luan, Jian’an, Lunetta, Kathryn L., Mägi, Reedik, Mangino, Massimo, Medland, Sarah E., Meisinger, Christa, Noordam, Raymond, Nutile, Teresa, Concas, Maria Pina, Polašek, Ozren, Porcu, Eleonora, Ring, Susan M., Sala, Cinzia, Smith, Albert V., Tanaka, Toshiko, van der Most, Peter J., Vitart, Veronique, Wang, Carol A., Willemsen, Gonneke, Zygmunt, Marek, Ahearn, Thomas U., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C., Auer, Paul L., Barnes, Catriona L. K., Beckmann, Matthias W., Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Stig E., Brenner, Hermann, Buring, Julie E., Canzian, Federico, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Couch, Fergus J., Cox, Angela, Crisponi, Laura, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Demerath, Ellen W., Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, De Vivo, Immaculata, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M., Dwek, Miriam, Eriksson, Johan G., Fasching, Peter A., Fernandez-Rhodes, Lindsay, Ferreli, Liana, Fletcher, Olivia, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A., González-Neira, Anna, Grallert, Harald, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A., Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hakonarson, Hakon, Hart, Roger J., Hickey, Martha, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L., Hottenga, Jouke-Jan, Hu, Frank B., Huebner, Hanna, Hunter, David J., Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M., Karasik, David, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Kristensen, Vessela N., Lacey, James V., Lambrechts, Diether, Launer, Lenore J., Lind, Penelope A., Lindblom, Annika, Magnusson, Patrik K. E., Mannermaa, Arto, McCarthy, Mark I., Meitinger, Thomas, Menni, Cristina, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Millwood, Iona Y., Milne, Roger L., Montgomery, Grant W., Nevanlinna, Heli, Nolte, Ilja M., Nyholt, Dale R., Obi, Nadia, O’Brien, Katie M., Offit, Kenneth, Oldehinkel, Albertine J., Ostrowski, Sisse R., Palotie, Aarno, Pedersen, Ole B., Peters, Annette, Pianigiani, Giulia, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Pouta, Anneli, Pozarickij, Alfred, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rosendaal, Frits R., Ruggiero, Daniela, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P., Schipf, Sabine, Schmidt, Carsten O., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Small, Kerrin, Spedicati, Beatrice, Stampfer, Meir, Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M., Teras, Lauren R., Tikkanen, Emmi, Turman, Constance, Vachon, Celine M., Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Zemel, Babette S., Zheng, Wei, van Dijk, Ko W., Alizadeh, Behrooz Z., Bandinelli, Stefania, Boerwinkle, Eric, Boomsma, Dorret I., Ciullo, Marina, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cucca, Francesco, Esko, Tõnu, Gieger, Christian, Grant, Struan F. A., Gudnason, Vilmundur, Hayward, Caroline, Kolčić, Ivana, Kraft, Peter, Lawlor, Deborah A., Martin, Nicholas G., Nøhr, Ellen A., Pedersen, Nancy L., Pennell, Craig E., Ridker, Paul M., Robino, Antonietta, Snieder, Harold, Sovio, Ulla, Spector, Tim D., Stöckl, Doris, Sudlow, Cathie, Timpson, Nic J., Toniolo, Daniela, Uitterlinden, André, Ulivi, Sheila, Völzke, Henry, Wareham, Nicholas J., Widen, Elisabeth, Wilson, James F., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Li, Liming, Easton, Douglas F., Njølstad, Pål R., Sulem, Patrick, Murabito, Joanne M., Murray, Anna, Manousaki, Despoina, Juul, Anders, Erikstrup, Christian, Stefansson, Kari, Horikoshi, Momoko, Chen, Zhengming, Farooqi, I. Sadaf, Pitteloud, Nelly, Johansson, Stefan, Day, Felix R., Perry, John R. B., and Ong, Ken K.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Fine-mapping analysis including over 254,000 East Asian and European descendants identifies 136 putative colorectal cancer susceptibility genes

Author

Zhishan Chen, Xingyi Guo, Ran Tao, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Philip J. Law, Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla, Jie Ping, Guochong Jia, Jirong Long, Chao Li, Quanhu Shen, Yuhan Xie, Maria N. Timofeeva, Minta Thomas, Stephanie L. Schmit, Virginia Díez-Obrero, Matthew Devall, Ferran Moratalla-Navarro, Juan Fernandez-Tajes, Claire Palles, Kitty Sherwood, Sarah E. W. Briggs, Victoria Svinti, Kevin Donnelly, Susan M. Farrington, James Blackmur, Peter G. Vaughan-Shaw, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yingchang Lu, Peter Broderick, James Studd, Tabitha A. Harrison, David V. Conti, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Marilena Melas, Gad Rennert, Mireia Obón-Santacana, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Jae Hwan Oh, Jeongseon Kim, Sun Ha Jee, Keum Ji Jung, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin, Aesun Shin, Yoon-Ok Ahn, Dong-Hyun Kim, Isao Oze, Wanqing Wen, Keitaro Matsuo, Koichi Matsuda, Chizu Tanikawa, Zefang Ren, Yu-Tang Gao, Wei-Hua Jia, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins, Aung Ko Win, Rish K. Pai, Jane C. Figueiredo, Robert W. Haile, Steven Gallinger, Michael O. Woods, Polly A. Newcomb, David Duggan, Jeremy P. Cheadle, Richard Kaplan, Rachel Kerr, David Kerr, Iva Kirac, Jan Böhm, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Pekka Jousilahti, Paul Knekt, Lauri A. Aaltonen, Harri Rissanen, Eero Pukkala, Johan G. Eriksson, Tatiana Cajuso, Ulrika Hänninen, Johanna Kondelin, Kimmo Palin, Tomas Tanskanen, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Satu Männistö, Demetrius Albanes, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Edward Ruiz-Narvaez, Julie R. Palmer, Daniel D. Buchanan, Elizabeth A. Platz, Kala Visvanathan, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Erin Siegel, Stefanie Brezina, Andrea Gsur, Peter T. Campbell, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Martha L. Slattery, John D. Potter, Kostas K. Tsilidis, Matthias B. Schulze, Marc J. Gunter, Neil Murphy, Antoni Castells, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Leticia Moreira, Volker Arndt, Anna Shcherbina, D. Timothy Bishop, Graham G. Giles, Melissa C. Southey, Gregory E. Idos, Kevin J. McDonnell, Zomoroda Abu-Ful, Joel K. Greenson, Katerina Shulman, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Kenneth Offit, Yu-Ru Su, Robert Steinfelder, Temitope O. Keku, Bethany van Guelpen, Thomas J. Hudson, Heather Hampel, Rachel Pearlman, Sonja I. Berndt, Richard B. Hayes, Marie Elena Martinez, Sushma S. Thomas, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Susanna C. Larsson, Yun Yen, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Emily White, Li Li, Kimberly F. Doheny, Elizabeth Pugh, Tameka Shelford, Andrew T. Chan, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Annika Lindblom, David J. Hunter, Amit D. Joshi, Clemens Schafmayer, Peter C. Scacheri, Anshul Kundaje, Robert E. Schoen, Jochen Hampe, Zsofia K. Stadler, Pavel Vodicka, Ludmila Vodickova, Veronika Vymetalkova, Christopher K. Edlund, W. James Gauderman, David Shibata, Amanda Toland, Sanford Markowitz, Andre Kim, Stephen J. Chanock, Franzel van Duijnhoven, Edith J. M. Feskens, Lori C. Sakoda, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Alicja Wolk, Barbara Pardini, Liesel M. FitzGerald, Soo Chin Lee, Shuji Ogino, Stephanie A. Bien, Charles Kooperberg, Christopher I. Li, Yi Lin, Ross Prentice, Conghui Qu, Stéphane Bézieau, Taiki Yamaji, Norie Sawada, Motoki Iwasaki, Loic Le Marchand, Anna H. Wu, Chenxu Qu, Caroline E. McNeil, Gerhard Coetzee, Caroline Hayward, Ian J. Deary, Sarah E. Harris, Evropi Theodoratou, Stuart Reid, Marion Walker, Li Yin Ooi, Ken S. Lau, Hongyu Zhao, Li Hsu, Qiuyin Cai, Malcolm G. Dunlop, Stephen B. Gruber, Richard S. Houlston, Victor Moreno, Graham Casey, Ulrike Peters, Ian Tomlinson, and Wei Zheng

Subjects
Science
Abstract

Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 common genetic variants independently associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but the causal variants and target genes are mostly unknown. We sought to fine-map all known CRC risk loci using GWAS data from 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of East Asian and European ancestry. Our stepwise conditional analyses revealed 238 independent association signals of CRC risk, each with a set of credible causal variants (CCVs), of which 28 signals had a single CCV. Our cis-eQTL/mQTL and colocalization analyses using colorectal tissue-specific transcriptome and methylome data separately from 1299 and 321 individuals, along with functional genomic investigation, uncovered 136 putative CRC susceptibility genes, including 56 genes not previously reported. Analyses of single-cell RNA-seq data from colorectal tissues revealed 17 putative CRC susceptibility genes with distinct expression patterns in specific cell types. Analyses of whole exome sequencing data provided additional support for several target genes identified in this study as CRC susceptibility genes. Enrichment analyses of the 136 genes uncover pathways not previously linked to CRC risk. Our study substantially expanded association signals for CRC and provided additional insight into the biological mechanisms underlying CRC development.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Genome-wide association analyses of ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery identify candidate genes for residual disease

Author

Dhanya Ramachandran, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Stefan Kommoss, Anna DeFazio, Marjorie J. Riggan, AOCS Group, Penelope M. Webb, Peter A. Fasching, Diether Lambrechts, María J. García, Cristina Rodríguez-Antona, Marc T. Goodman, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Lester, Susanne K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Estrid Høgdall, Ellen L. Goode, William A. Cliby, Amanika Kumar, Chen Wang, Julie M. Cunningham, Stacey J. Winham, Alvaro N. Monteiro, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Daniel W. Cramer, Kathryn L. Terry, Linda Titus, Line Bjorge, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen, OPAL Study Group, Tanja Pejovic, Claus K. Høgdall, Iain A. McNeish, Taymaa May, David G. Huntsman, Jacobus Pfisterer, Ulrich Canzler, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Willibald Schröder, Antje Belau, Lars Hanker, Philipp Harter, Jalid Sehouli, Rainer Kimmig, Nikolaus de Gregorio, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Klaus Baumann, Felix Hilpert, Alexander Burges, Boris Winterhoff, Peter Schürmann, Lisa-Marie Speith, Peter Hillemanns, Andrew Berchuck, Sharon E. Johnatty, Susan J. Ramus, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Thilo Dörk, and Florian Heitz

Subjects
Medicine, Genetics, QH426-470
Abstract

Abstract Survival from ovarian cancer depends on the resection status after primary surgery. We performed genome-wide association analyses for resection status of 7705 ovarian cancer patients, including 4954 with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), to identify variants associated with residual disease. The most significant association with resection status was observed for rs72845444, upstream of MGMT, in HGSOC (p = 3.9 × 10−8). In gene-based analyses, PPP2R5C was the most strongly associated gene in HGSOC after stage adjustment. In an independent set of 378 ovarian tumours from the AGO-OVAR 11 study, variants near MGMT and PPP2R5C correlated with methylation and transcript levels, and PPP2R5C mRNA levels predicted progression-free survival in patients with residual disease. MGMT encodes a DNA repair enzyme, and PPP2R5C encodes the B56γ subunit of the PP2A tumour suppressor. Our results link heritable variation at these two loci with resection status in HGSOC.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Increased FOXJ1 protein expression is associated with improved overall survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium Study

Author

Weir, Ashley, Kang, Eun-Young, Meagher, Nicola S, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Ryan, Andy, Singh, Naveena, Widschwendter, Martin, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, Paz-Ares, Luis, Gayarre, Javier, Gilks, Blake C, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Heublein, Sabine, Huang, Yajue, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kommoss, Felix KF, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kraemer, Bernhard, Le, Nhu D, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Ruebner, Matthias, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Steed, Helen, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Traficante, Nadia, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, García, María J, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kommoss, Stefan, Modugno, Francesmary, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sinn, Hans-Peter, Staebler, Annette, Kelemen, Linda E, Ford, Caroline E, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul DP, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Biomarkers, Tumor, Forkhead Transcription Factors, AOCs group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundRecently, we showed a >60% difference in 5-year survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) when stratified by a 101-gene mRNA expression prognostic signature. Given the varied patient outcomes, this study aimed to translate prognostic mRNA markers into protein expression assays by immunohistochemistry and validate their survival association in HGSC.MethodsTwo prognostic genes, FOXJ1 and GMNN, were selected based on high-quality antibodies, correlation with protein expression and variation in immunohistochemical scores in a preliminary cohort (n = 134 and n = 80, respectively). Six thousand four hundred and thirty-four (FOXJ1) and 5470 (GMNN) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian neoplasms (4634 and 4185 HGSC, respectively) represented on tissue microarrays from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium underwent immunohistochemical staining and scoring, then univariate and multivariate survival analysis.ResultsConsistent with mRNA, FOXJ1 protein expression exhibited a linear, increasing association with improved overall survival in HGSC patients. Women with >50% expression had the most favourable outcomes (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91, p 35% GMNN expression showed a trend for better outcomes, though this was not significant.ConclusionWe provide foundational evidence for the prognostic value of FOXJ1 in HGSC, validating the prior mRNA-based prognostic association by immunohistochemistry.

Published
2023

21. Lifestyle and personal factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreductive surgery

Author

Phung, Minh Tung, Webb, Penelope M, DeFazio, Anna, Fereday, Sian, Lee, Alice W, Bowtell, David DL, Fasching, Peter A, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Matsuo, Keitaro, Modugno, Francesmary, Brenton, James D, Van Gorp, Toon, Pharoah, Paul DP, Schildkraut, Joellen M, McLean, Karen, Meza, Rafael, Mukherjee, Bhramar, Richardson, Jean, Grout, Bronwyn, Chase, Anne, Deurloo, Cindy McKinnon, Terry, Kathryn L, Hanley, Gillian E, Pike, Malcolm C, Berchuck, Andrew, Ramus, Susan J, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, and Consortium, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association

Subjects
Reproductive Medicine, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Estrogen, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Clinical Research, Women's Health, Ovarian Cancer, Contraception/Reproduction, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, Good Health and Well Being, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Parity, Ovarian cancer, Residual disease, Primary cytoreductive surgery, Lifestyle, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Reproductive medicine
Abstract

ObjectiveThe presence of macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is an important factor influencing survival for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). More research is needed to identify factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed 12 lifestyle and personal exposures known to be related to ovarian cancer risk or inflammation to identify those associated with having residual disease after surgery.MethodsThis analysis used data on 2054 patients with advanced stage HGSC from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The exposures were body mass index, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use, endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, incomplete pregnancy, menopausal hormone therapy use, menopausal status, parity, smoking, and tubal ligation. Logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between these exposures and having residual disease following PCS.ResultsMenopausal estrogen-only therapy (ET) use was associated with 33% lower odds of having macroscopic residual disease compared to never use (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.46-0.97, p = 0.033). Compared to nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had 36% lower odds of having residual disease (OR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.94, p = 0.022), while there was no association among parous women who breastfed (OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.65-1.25, p = 0.53).ConclusionsThe association between ET and having no macroscopic residual disease is plausible given a strong underlying biologic hypothesis between this exposure and diagnosis with HGSC. If this or the parity finding is replicated, these factors could be included in risk stratification models to determine whether HGSC patients should receive PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Published
2023

22. Profiling the immune landscape in mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Author

Meagher, Nicola, Hamilton, Phineas, Milne, Katy, Thornton, Shelby, Harris, Bronwyn, Weir, Ashley, Alsop, Jennifer, Bisinoto, Christiani, Brenton, James, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Chiu, Derek, Cushing-Haugen, Kara, Fereday, Sian, Garsed, Dale, Gayther, Simon, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, Blake, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine, Le, Nhu, Piskorz, Anna, Riggan, Marjorie, Shah, Mitul, Singh, Naveena, Talhouk, Aline, Widschwendter, Martin, Bowtell, David, Candido Dos Reis, Francisco, Cook, Linda, Fortner, Renée, García, María, Harris, Holly, Huntsman, David, Köbel, Martin, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul, Doherty, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael, Pike, Malcolm, Pearce, Celeste, Friedlander, Michael, DeFazio, Anna, Nelson, Brad, Ramus, Susan, and Karnezis, Anthony

Subjects
Immune infiltrate, Mucinous ovarian carcinoma, Rare histotype, Humans, Female, B7-H1 Antigen, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Tumor Microenvironment
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare histotype of ovarian cancer, with low response rates to standard chemotherapy, and very poor survival for patients diagnosed at advanced stage. There is a limited understanding of the MOC immune landscape, and consequently whether immune checkpoint inhibitors could be considered for a subset of patients. METHODS: We performed multicolor immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) on tissue microarrays in a cohort of 126 MOC patients. Cell densities were calculated in the epithelial and stromal components for tumor-associated macrophages (CD68+/PD-L1+, CD68+/PD-L1-), T cells (CD3+/CD8-, CD3+/CD8+), putative T-regulatory cells (Tregs, FOXP3+), B cells (CD20+/CD79A+), plasma cells (CD20-/CD79a+), and PD-L1+ and PD-1+ cells, and compared these values with clinical factors. Univariate and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards assessed overall survival. Unsupervised k-means clustering identified patient subsets with common patterns of immune cell infiltration. RESULTS: Mean densities of PD1+ cells, PD-L1- macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and FOXP3+ Tregs were higher in the stroma compared to the epithelium. Tumors from advanced (Stage III/IV) MOC had greater epithelial infiltration of PD-L1- macrophages, and fewer PD-L1+ macrophages compared with Stage I/II cancers (p = 0.004 and p = 0.014 respectively). Patients with high epithelial density of FOXP3+ cells, CD8+/FOXP3+ cells, or PD-L1- macrophages, had poorer survival, and high epithelial CD79a + plasma cells conferred better survival, all upon univariate analysis only. Clustering showed that most MOC (86%) had an immune depleted (cold) phenotype, with only a small proportion (11/76,14%) considered immune inflamed (hot) based on T cell and PD-L1 infiltrates. CONCLUSION: In summary, MOCs are mostly immunogenically cold, suggesting they may have limited response to current immunotherapies.

Published
2023

23. Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies

Author

Jung, Audrey Y, Ahearn, Thomas U, Behrens, Sabine, Middha, Pooja, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Carey, Lisa A, Consortium, CTS, Czene, Kamila, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Giles, Graham G, Guénel, Pascal, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Hüsing, Anika, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Lacey, James V, Le Marchand, Loic, Lissowska, Jolanta, Loizidou, Maria A, Mannermaa, Arto, Maurer, Tabea, Murphy, Rachel A, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Patel, Alpa V, Perou, Charles M, Rennert, Gad, Shibli, Rana, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Southey, Melissa C, Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Troester, Melissa A, Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Sophia S, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zheng, Wei, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Schmidt, Marjanka K, García-Closas, Montserrat, and Chang-Claude, Jenny

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Aging, Reproductive health and childbirth, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, CTS Consortium, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundReproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear.MethodsAnalyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsCompared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like.ConclusionsThis large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.

Published
2022

24. Molecular subclasses of clear cell ovarian carcinoma and their impact on disease behavior and outcomes

Author

Bolton, Kelly L, Chen, Denise, de la Fuente, Rosario I Corona, Fu, Zhuxuan, Murali, Rajmohan, K�bel, Martin, Tazi, Yanis, Cunningham, Julie M, Chan, Irenaeus CC, Wiley, Brian J, Moukarzel, Lea A, Winham, Stacey J, Armasu, Sebastian M, Lester, Jenny, Elishaev, Esther, Laslavic, Angela, Kennedy, Catherine J, Piskorz, Anna, Sekowska, Magdalena, Brand, Alison H, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Pharoah, Paul, Elias, Kevin M, Drapkin, Ronny, Churchman, Michael, Gourley, Charlie, DeFazio, Anna, Karlan, Beth, Brenton, James D, Weigelt, Britta, Anglesio, Michael S, Huntsman, David, Gayther, Simon A, Konner, Jason, Modugno, Francesmary, Lawrenson, Kate, Goode, Ellen L, and Papaemmanuil, Elli

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Women's Health, Human Genome, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Precision Medicine, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Mutation, Endometriosis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeTo identify molecular subclasses of clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) and assess their impact on clinical presentation and outcomes.Experimental designWe profiled 421 primary CCOCs that passed quality control using a targeted deep sequencing panel of 163 putative CCOC driver genes and whole transcriptome sequencing of 211 of these tumors. Molecularly defined subgroups were identified and tested for association with clinical characteristics and overall survival.ResultsWe detected a putative somatic driver mutation in at least one candidate gene in 95% (401/421) of CCOC tumors including ARID1A (in 49% of tumors), PIK3CA (49%), TERT (20%), and TP53 (16%). Clustering of cancer driver mutations and RNA expression converged upon two distinct subclasses of CCOC. The first was dominated by ARID1A-mutated tumors with enriched expression of canonical CCOC genes and markers of platinum resistance; the second was largely comprised of tumors with TP53 mutations and enriched for the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix organization and mesenchymal differentiation. Compared with the ARID1A-mutated group, women with TP53-mutated tumors were more likely to have advanced-stage disease, no antecedent history of endometriosis, and poorer survival, driven by their advanced stage at presentation. In women with ARID1A-mutated tumors, there was a trend toward a lower rate of response to first-line platinum-based therapy.ConclusionsOur study suggests that CCOC consists of two distinct molecular subclasses with distinct clinical presentation and outcomes, with potential relevance to both traditional and experimental therapy responsiveness. See related commentary by Lheureux, p. 4838.

Published
2022

25. An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy

Author

Isabelle Grootes, Gordon C. Wishart, and Paul David Peter Pharoah

Subjects
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract PREDICT Breast ( www.breast .predict.nhs.uk ) is a prognostication tool for early invasive breast cancer. The current version was based on cases diagnosed in 1999–2003 and did not incorporate the benefits of radiotherapy or the harms associated with therapy. Since then, there has been a substantial improvement in the outcomes for breast cancer cases. The aim of this study was to update PREDICT Breast to ensure that the underlying model is appropriate for contemporary patients. Data from the England National Cancer Registration and Advisory Service for invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed 2000–17 were used for model development and validation. Model development was based on 35,474 cases diagnosed and registered by the Eastern Cancer Registry. A Cox model was used to estimate the prognostic effects of the year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumour size, tumour grade and number of positive nodes. Separate models were developed for ER-positive and ER-negative disease. Data on 32,408 cases from the West Midlands Cancer Registry and 100,551 cases from other cancer registries were used for validation. The new model was well-calibrated; predicted breast cancer deaths at 5-, 10- and 15-year were within 10 per cent of the observed validation data. Discrimination was also good: The AUC for 15-year breast cancer survival was 0.809 in the West Midlands data set and 0.846 in the data set for the other registries. The new PREDICT Breast model outperformed the current model and will be implemented in the online tool which should lead to more accurate absolute treatment benefit predictions for individual patients.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Polymorphisms in genes of melatonin biosynthesis and signaling support the light-at-night hypothesis for breast cancer

Author

Wichert, Katharina, Hoppe, Reiner, Ickstadt, Katja, Behrens, Thomas, Winter, Stefan, Herold, Robert, Terschüren, Claudia, Lo, Wing-Yee, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lush, Michael, Andrulis, Irene L., Brenner, Hermann, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S., Czene, Kamila, Eriksson, Mikael, Figueroa, Jonine D., García-Closas, Montserrat, Goldberg, Mark S., Hamann, Ute, He, Wei, Holleczek, Bernd, Hopper, John L., Jakubowska, Anna, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Lubiński, Jan, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Obi, Nadia, Rhenius, Valerie, Shah, Mitul, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Simard, Jacques, Southey, Melissa C., Zheng, Wei, Dunning, Alison M., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Hall, Per, Easton, Douglas F., Brüning, Thomas, Brauch, Hiltrud, Harth, Volker, and Rabstein, Sylvia

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Exome sequencing identifies breast cancer susceptibility genes and defines the contribution of coding variants to breast cancer risk

Author

Wilcox, Naomi, Dumont, Martine, González-Neira, Anna, Carvalho, Sara, Joly Beauparlant, Charles, Crotti, Marco, Luccarini, Craig, Soucy, Penny, Dubois, Stéphane, Nuñez-Torres, Rocio, Pita, Guillermo, Gardner, Eugene J., Dennis, Joe, Alonso, M. Rosario, Álvarez, Nuria, Baynes, Caroline, Collin-Deschesnes, Annie Claude, Desjardins, Sylvie, Becher, Heiko, Behrens, Sabine, Bolla, Manjeet K., Castelao, Jose E., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cornelissen, Sten, Dörk, Thilo, Engel, Christoph, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Guénel, Pascal, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Hahnen, Eric, Hartman, Mikael, Herráez, Belén, Jung, Audrey, Keeman, Renske, Kiechle, Marion, Li, Jingmei, Loizidou, Maria A., Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Panayiotidis, Mihalis I., Sim, Xueling, Teo, Soo Hwang, Tyrer, Jonathan P., van der Kolk, Lizet E., Wahlström, Cecilia, Wang, Qin, Perry, John R. B., Benitez, Javier, Schmidt, Marjanka K., Schmutzler, Rita K., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Droit, Arnaud, Dunning, Alison M., Kvist, Anders, Devilee, Peter, Easton, Douglas F., and Simard, Jacques

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations

Author

Thomas, Minta, Su, Yu-Ru, Rosenthal, Elisabeth A., Sakoda, Lori C., Schmit, Stephanie L., Timofeeva, Maria N., Chen, Zhishan, Fernandez-Rozadilla, Ceres, Law, Philip J., Murphy, Neil, Carreras-Torres, Robert, Diez-Obrero, Virginia, van Duijnhoven, Franzel J. B., Jiang, Shangqing, Shin, Aesun, Wolk, Alicja, Phipps, Amanda I., Burnett-Hartman, Andrea, Gsur, Andrea, Chan, Andrew T., Zauber, Ann G., Wu, Anna H., Lindblom, Annika, Um, Caroline Y., Tangen, Catherine M., Gignoux, Chris, Newton, Christina, Haiman, Christopher A., Qu, Conghui, Bishop, D. Timothy, Buchanan, Daniel D., Crosslin, David R., Conti, David V., Kim, Dong-Hyun, Hauser, Elizabeth, White, Emily, Siegel, Erin, Schumacher, Fredrick R., Rennert, Gad, Giles, Graham G., Hampel, Heather, Brenner, Hermann, Oze, Isao, Oh, Jae Hwan, Lee, Jeffrey K., Schneider, Jennifer L., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Kim, Jeongseon, Huyghe, Jeroen R., Zheng, Jiayin, Hampe, Jochen, Greenson, Joel, Hopper, John L., Palmer, Julie R., Visvanathan, Kala, Matsuo, Keitaro, Matsuda, Koichi, Jung, Keum Ji, Li, Li, Le Marchand, Loic, Vodickova, Ludmila, Bujanda, Luis, Gunter, Marc J., Matejcic, Marco, Jenkins, Mark A., Slattery, Martha L., D’Amato, Mauro, Wang, Meilin, Hoffmeister, Michael, Woods, Michael O., Kim, Michelle, Song, Mingyang, Iwasaki, Motoki, Du, Mulong, Udaltsova, Natalia, Sawada, Norie, Vodicka, Pavel, Campbell, Peter T., Newcomb, Polly A., Cai, Qiuyin, Pearlman, Rachel, Pai, Rish K., Schoen, Robert E., Steinfelder, Robert S., Haile, Robert W., Vandenputtelaar, Rosita, Prentice, Ross L., Küry, Sébastien, Castellví-Bel, Sergi, Tsugane, Shoichiro, Berndt, Sonja I., Lee, Soo Chin, Brezina, Stefanie, Weinstein, Stephanie J., Chanock, Stephen J., Jee, Sun Ha, Kweon, Sun-Seog, Vadaparampil, Susan, Harrison, Tabitha A., Yamaji, Taiki, Keku, Temitope O., Vymetalkova, Veronika, Arndt, Volker, Jia, Wei-Hua, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Lin, Yi, Ahn, Yoon-Ok, Stadler, Zsofia K., Van Guelpen, Bethany, Ulrich, Cornelia M., Platz, Elizabeth A., Potter, John D., Li, Christopher I., Meester, Reinier, Moreno, Victor, Figueiredo, Jane C., Casey, Graham, Lansdorp Vogelaar, Iris, Dunlop, Malcolm G., Gruber, Stephen B., Hayes, Richard B., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Houlston, Richard S., Jarvik, Gail P., Tomlinson, Ian P., Zheng, Wei, Corley, Douglas A., Peters, Ulrike, and Hsu, Li

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry

Author

Middha, Pooja, Wang, Xiaoliang, Behrens, Sabine, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Ahearn, Thomas U., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J., Auer, Paul L., Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thaïs, Freeman, Laura E. Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W., Benitez, Javier, Bojesen, Stig E., Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Castelao, Jose E., Chanock, Stephen J., Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Couch, Fergus J., Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S., Czene, Kamila, Dossus, Laure, Dugué, Pierre-Antoine, Eliassen, A. Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D. Gareth, Fasching, Peter A., Figueroa, Jonine D., Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Giles, Graham G., González-Neira, Anna, Grassmann, Felix, Grundy, Anne, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A., Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hankinson, Susan E., Harkness, Elaine F., Holleczek, Bernd, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L., Houlston, Richard S., Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J., Ingvar, Christian, Isaksson, Karolin, Jernström, Helena, John, Esther M., Jones, Michael E., Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M., Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kurian, Allison W., Lacey, James V., Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L., Larsson, Susanna, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Li, Shuai, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Mulot, Claire, Murphy, Rachel A., Newman, William G., Nielsen, Sune F., Nordestgaard, Børge G., Norman, Aaron, O’Brien, Katie M., Olson, Janet E., Patel, Alpa V., Prentice, Ross, Rees-Punia, Erika, Rennert, Gad, Rhenius, Valerie, Ruddy, Kathryn J., Sandler, Dale P., Scott, Christopher G., Shah, Mitul, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Smeets, Ann, Southey, Melissa C., Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M., Taylor, Jack A., Teras, Lauren R., Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Troester, Melissa A., Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M., Wang, Sophia S., Weinberg, Clarice R., Wildiers, Hans, Willett, Walter, Winham, Stacey J., Wolk, Alicja, Yang, Xiaohong R., Zamora, M. Pilar, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Dunning, Alison M., Pharoah, Paul D. P., García-Closas, Montserrat, Schmidt, Marjanka K., Kraft, Peter, Milne, Roger L., Lindström, Sara, Easton, Douglas F., and Chang-Claude, Jenny

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. PREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants

Author

Muranen, Taru A., Morra, Anna, Khan, Sofia, Barnes, Daniel R., Bolla, Manjeet K., Dennis, Joe, Keeman, Renske, Leslie, Goska, Parsons, Michael T., Wang, Qin, Ahearn, Thomas U., Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L., Arun, Banu K., Behrens, Sabine, Bialkowska, Katarzyna, Bojesen, Stig E., Camp, Nicola J., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Domchek, Susan M., Dunning, Alison M., Engel, Christoph, Evans, D. Gareth, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Glendon, Gord, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hanson, Helen, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Izatt, Louise, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul A., Kristensen, Vessela N., Lalloo, Fiona, Lindeman, Geoffrey J., Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara, Neuhausen, Susan L., Newman, William G., Peterlongo, Paolo, Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Rantala, Johanna, Rønlund, Karina, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Schmutzler, Rita K., Schneeweiss, Andreas, Singer, Christian F., Suvanto, Maija, Tan, Yen Yen, Teixeira, Manuel R., Thomassen, Mads, Tischkowitz, Marc, Tripathi, Vishakha, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Zhao, Emily, Easton, Douglas F., Antoniou, Antonis C., Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Blomqvist, Carl, and Nevanlinna, Heli

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry

Author

Mueller, Stefanie H., Lai, Alvina G., Valkovskaya, Maria, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Abu-Ful, Zomoruda, Ahearn, Thomas U., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J., Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thais, Freeman, Laura E. Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W., Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Stig E., Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y., Buys, Saundra S., Castelao, Jose E., Chan, Tsun L., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Choi, Ji-Yeob, Chung, Wendy K., Colonna, Sarah V., Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J., Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M., Ekici, Arif B., Eliassen, A. Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D. Gareth, Fasching, Peter A., Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Yu-Tang, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A., Genkinger, Jeanine, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Grassmann, Felix, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A., Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Harkness, Elaine F., Harrington, Patricia A., Hartikainen, Jaana M., Hartman, Mikael, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L., Houlston, Richard S., Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J., Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M., Jones, Michael E., Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M., Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N., Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W., Kwong, Ava, Lacey, James V., Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Linet, Martha, Lo, Wing-Yee, Long, Jirong, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Menon, Usha, Muir, Kenneth, Murphy, Rachel A., Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G., Niederacher, Dieter, O’Brien, Katie M., Obi, Nadia, Offit, Kenneth, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olshan, Andrew F., Olsson, Håkan, Park, Sue K., Patel, Alpa V., Patel, Achal, Perou, Charles M., Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Presneau, Nadege, Rack, Brigitte, Radice, Paolo, Ramachandran, Dhanya, Rashid, Muhammad U., Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Ruddy, Kathryn J., Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P., Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Schmutzler, Rita K., Schneider, Michael O., Scott, Christopher, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Priyanka, Shen, Chen-Yang, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Simard, Jacques, Surowy, Harald, Tamimi, Rulla M., Tapper, William J., Taylor, Jack A., Teo, Soo Hwang, Teras, Lauren R., Toland, Amanda E., Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M., Torres, Diana, Torres-Mejía, Gabriela, Troester, Melissa A., Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M., Vijai, Joseph, Weinberg, Clarice R., Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H., Yamaji, Taiki, Yang, Xiaohong R., Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ziv, Elad, Dunning, Alison M., Easton, Douglas F., Hemingway, Harry, Hamann, Ute, and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Risks of second primary cancers among 584,965 female and male breast cancer survivors in England: a 25-year retrospective cohort studyResearch in context

Author

Isaac Allen, Hend Hassan, Walburga Yvonne Joko-Fru, Catherine Huntley, Lucy Loong, Tameera Rahman, Bethany Torr, Andrew Bacon, Craig Knott, Sophie Jose, Sally Vernon, Margreet Lüchtenborg, Joanna Pethick, Katrina Lavelle, Fiona McRonald, Diana Eccles, Eva J.A Morris, Steven Hardy, Clare Turnbull, Marc Tischkowitz, Paul Pharoah, and Antonis C. Antoniou

Subjects
Breast cancer, Second primary cancer, Risk, Incidence, Treatment, Pathology, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

Summary: Background: Second primary cancers (SPCs) after breast cancer (BC) present an increasing public health burden, with little existing research on socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment effects. We addressed this in the largest BC survivor cohort to date, using a novel linkage of National Disease Registration Service datasets. Methods: The cohort included 581,403 female and 3562 male BC survivors diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for combined and site-specific SPCs using incidences for England, overall and by age at BC and socioeconomic status. We estimated incidences and Kaplan–Meier cumulative risks stratified by age at BC, and assessed risk variation by socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment characteristics using Cox regression. Findings: Both genders were at elevated contralateral breast (SIR: 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.06) females; 55.4 (35.5–82.4) males) and non-breast (1.10 (1.09–1.11) females, 1.10 (1.00–1.20) males) SPC risks. Non-breast SPC risks were higher for females younger at BC diagnosis (SIR: 1.34 (1.31–1.38)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. Reproductive factors do not influence survival with ovarian cancer

Author

Phung, Minh Tung, Alimujiang, Aliya, Berchuck, Andrew, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Bandera, Elisa V, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chase, Anne, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Grout, Bronwyn, Goodman, Marc T, Hanley, Gillian E, Lee, Alice W, McKinnon Deurloo, Cindy, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Pharoah, Paul DP, Pike, Malcolm C, Richardson, Jean, Risch, Harvey A, Sieh, Weiva, Terry, Kathryn L, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wu, Anna H, and Pearce, Celeste Leigh

Subjects
Aging, Contraception/Reproduction, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Reproductive health and childbirth, Good Health and Well Being, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Menarche, Ovarian Neoplasms, Parity, Pregnancy, Reproductive History, Risk Factors, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology
Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies on the association between reproductive factors and ovarian cancer survival are equivocal, possibly due to small sample sizes.MethodsUsing data on 11,175 people diagnosed with primary invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (ovarian cancer) from 16 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), we examined the associations between survival and age at menarche, combined oral contraceptive use, parity, breastfeeding, age at last pregnancy, and menopausal status using Cox proportional hazard models. The models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, education level, and OCAC study and stratified on stage and histotype.ResultsDuring the mean follow-up of 6.34 years (SD = 4.80), 6,418 patients passed away (57.4%). There was no evidence of associations between the reproductive factors and survival among patients with ovarian cancer overall or by histotype.ConclusionsThis study found no association between reproductive factors and survival after an ovarian cancer diagnosis.ImpactReproductive factors are well-established risk factors for ovarian cancer, but they are not associated with survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Published
2022

37. A multi-level investigation of the genetic relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer histotypes

Author

Mortlock, Sally, Corona, Rosario I, Kho, Pik Fang, Pharoah, Paul, Seo, Ji-Heui, Freedman, Matthew L, Gayther, Simon A, Siedhoff, Matthew T, Rogers, Peter AW, Leuchter, Ronald, Walsh, Christine S, Cass, Ilana, Karlan, Beth Y, Rimel, BJ, Consortium, International Endometriosis Genetics Consortium Ovarian Cancer Association, Montgomery, Grant W, Lawrenson, Kate, and Kar, Siddhartha P

Subjects
Endometriosis, Genetics, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, International Endometriosis Genetics Consortium, Mendelian randomization, endometriosis, epithelial ovarian cancer, genetic association, genetic correlation, genetic risk, histotype, meta-analysis
Abstract

Endometriosis is associated with increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Using data from large endometriosis and EOC genome-wide association meta-analyses, we estimate the genetic correlation and evaluate the causal relationship between genetic liability to endometriosis and EOC histotypes, and identify shared susceptibility loci. We estimate a significant genetic correlation (rg) between endometriosis and clear cell (rg = 0.71), endometrioid (rg = 0.48), and high-grade serous (rg = 0.19) ovarian cancer, associations supported by Mendelian randomization analyses. Bivariate meta-analysis identified 28 loci associated with both endometriosis and EOC, including 19 with evidence for a shared underlying association signal. Differences in the shared risk suggest different underlying pathways may contribute to the relationship between endometriosis and the different histotypes. Functional annotation using transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles of relevant tissues/cells highlights several target genes. This comprehensive analysis reveals profound genetic overlap between endometriosis and EOC histotypes with valuable genomic targets for understanding the biological mechanisms linking the diseases.

Published
2022

38. Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations

Author

Minta Thomas, Yu-Ru Su, Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Lori C. Sakoda, Stephanie L. Schmit, Maria N. Timofeeva, Zhishan Chen, Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla, Philip J. Law, Neil Murphy, Robert Carreras-Torres, Virginia Diez-Obrero, Franzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Shangqing Jiang, Aesun Shin, Alicja Wolk, Amanda I. Phipps, Andrea Burnett-Hartman, Andrea Gsur, Andrew T. Chan, Ann G. Zauber, Anna H. Wu, Annika Lindblom, Caroline Y. Um, Catherine M. Tangen, Chris Gignoux, Christina Newton, Christopher A. Haiman, Conghui Qu, D. Timothy Bishop, Daniel D. Buchanan, David R. Crosslin, David V. Conti, Dong-Hyun Kim, Elizabeth Hauser, Emily White, Erin Siegel, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Gad Rennert, Graham G. Giles, Heather Hampel, Hermann Brenner, Isao Oze, Jae Hwan Oh, Jeffrey K. Lee, Jennifer L. Schneider, Jenny Chang-Claude, Jeongseon Kim, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Jiayin Zheng, Jochen Hampe, Joel Greenson, John L. Hopper, Julie R. Palmer, Kala Visvanathan, Keitaro Matsuo, Koichi Matsuda, Keum Ji Jung, Li Li, Loic Le Marchand, Ludmila Vodickova, Luis Bujanda, Marc J. Gunter, Marco Matejcic, Mark A. Jenkins, Martha L. Slattery, Mauro D’Amato, Meilin Wang, Michael Hoffmeister, Michael O. Woods, Michelle Kim, Mingyang Song, Motoki Iwasaki, Mulong Du, Natalia Udaltsova, Norie Sawada, Pavel Vodicka, Peter T. Campbell, Polly A. Newcomb, Qiuyin Cai, Rachel Pearlman, Rish K. Pai, Robert E. Schoen, Robert S. Steinfelder, Robert W. Haile, Rosita Vandenputtelaar, Ross L. Prentice, Sébastien Küry, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Shoichiro Tsugane, Sonja I. Berndt, Soo Chin Lee, Stefanie Brezina, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Stephen J. Chanock, Sun Ha Jee, Sun-Seog Kweon, Susan Vadaparampil, Tabitha A. Harrison, Taiki Yamaji, Temitope O. Keku, Veronika Vymetalkova, Volker Arndt, Wei-Hua Jia, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yi Lin, Yoon-Ok Ahn, Zsofia K. Stadler, Bethany Van Guelpen, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Elizabeth A. Platz, John D. Potter, Christopher I. Li, Reinier Meester, Victor Moreno, Jane C. Figueiredo, Graham Casey, Iris Lansdorp Vogelaar, Malcolm G. Dunlop, Stephen B. Gruber, Richard B. Hayes, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Richard S. Houlston, Gail P. Jarvik, Ian P. Tomlinson, Wei Zheng, Douglas A. Corley, Ulrike Peters, and Li Hsu

Subjects
Science
Abstract

Abstract Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have great potential to guide precision colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention by identifying those at higher risk to undertake targeted screening. However, current PRS using European ancestry data have sub-optimal performance in non-European ancestry populations, limiting their utility among these populations. Towards addressing this deficiency, we expand PRS development for CRC by incorporating Asian ancestry data (21,731 cases; 47,444 controls) into European ancestry training datasets (78,473 cases; 107,143 controls). The AUC estimates (95% CI) of PRS are 0.63(0.62-0.64), 0.59(0.57-0.61), 0.62(0.60-0.63), and 0.65(0.63-0.66) in independent datasets including 1681-3651 cases and 8696-115,105 controls of Asian, Black/African American, Latinx/Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White, respectively. They are significantly better than the European-centric PRS in all four major US racial and ethnic groups (p-values

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses

Author

Dimou, Niki, Kim, Andre E., Flanagan, Orlagh, Murphy, Neil, Diez-Obrero, Virginia, Shcherbina, Anna, Aglago, Elom K., Bouras, Emmanouil, Campbell, Peter T., Casey, Graham, Gallinger, Steven, Gruber, Stephen B., Jenkins, Mark A., Lin, Yi, Moreno, Victor, Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward, Stern, Mariana C., Tian, Yu, Tsilidis, Kostas K., Arndt, Volker, Barry, Elizabeth L., Baurley, James W., Berndt, Sonja I., Bézieau, Stéphane, Bien, Stephanie A., Bishop, D. Timothy, Brenner, Hermann, Budiarto, Arif, Carreras-Torres, Robert, Cenggoro, Tjeng Wawan, Chan, Andrew T., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Chen, Xuechen, Conti, David V., Dampier, Christopher H., Devall, Matthew, Drew, David A., Figueiredo, Jane C., Giles, Graham G., Gsur, Andrea, Harrison, Tabitha A., Hidaka, Akihisa, Hoffmeister, Michael, Huyghe, Jeroen R., Jordahl, Kristina, Kawaguchi, Eric, Keku, Temitope O., Larsson, Susanna C., Le Marchand, Loic, Lewinger, Juan Pablo, Li, Li, Mahesworo, Bharuno, Morrison, John, Newcomb, Polly A., Newton, Christina C., Obon-Santacana, Mireia, Ose, Jennifer, Pai, Rish K., Palmer, Julie R., Papadimitriou, Nikos, Pardamean, Bens, Peoples, Anita R., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Platz, Elizabeth A., Potter, John D., Rennert, Gad, Scacheri, Peter C., Schoen, Robert E., Su, Yu-Ru, Tangen, Catherine M., Thibodeau, Stephen N., Thomas, Duncan C., Ulrich, Cornelia M., Um, Caroline Y., van Duijnhoven, Franzel J. B., Visvanathan, Kala, Vodicka, Pavel, Vodickova, Ludmila, White, Emily, Wolk, Alicja, Woods, Michael O., Qu, Conghui, Kundaje, Anshul, Hsu, Li, Gauderman, W. James, Gunter, Marc J., and Peters, Ulrike

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Genetically proxied glucose-lowering drug target perturbation and risk of cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis

Author

Yarmolinsky, James, Bouras, Emmanouil, Constantinescu, Andrei, Burrows, Kimberley, Bull, Caroline J., Vincent, Emma E., Martin, Richard M., Dimopoulou, Olympia, Lewis, Sarah J., Moreno, Victor, Vujkovic, Marijana, Chang, Kyong-Mi, Voight, Benjamin F., Tsao, Philip S., Gunter, Marc J., Hampe, Jochen, Pellatt, Andrew J., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Schoen, Robert E., Gallinger, Steven, Jenkins, Mark A., Pai, Rish K., Gill, Dipender, and Tsilidis, Kostas K.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

41. High pre-diagnosis inflammation-related risk score associated with decreased ovarian cancer survival

Author

Brieger, Katharine K, Phung, Minh Tung, Mukherjee, Bhramar, Bakulski, Kelly M, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Bowtell, David DL, Cramer, Daniel W, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fereday, Sian, Fortner, Renée Turzanski, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Harris, Holly R, Matsuo, Keitaro, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Qin, Bo, Ramus, Susan J, Risch, Harvey A, Rossing, Mary Anne, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Trabert, Britton, Vierkant, Robert A, Winham, Stacey J, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wu, Anna H, Ziogas, Argyrios, Khoja, Lilah, Cho, Kathleen R, McLean, Karen, Richardson, Jean, Grout, Bronwyn, Chase, Anne, Deurloo, Cindy McKinnon, Odunsi, Kunle, Nelson, Brad H, Brenton, James D, Terry, Kathryn L, Pharoah, Paul DP, Berchuck, Andrew, Hanley, Gillian E, Webb, Penelope M, Pike, Malcolm C, and Pearce, Celeste Leigh

Subjects
Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Tobacco, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Aged, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Health Behavior, Humans, Inflammation, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundThere is suggestive evidence that inflammation is related to ovarian cancer survival. However, more research is needed to identify inflammation-related factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and to determine their combined effects.MethodsThis analysis used pooled data on 8,147 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The prediagnosis inflammation-related exposures of interest included alcohol use; aspirin use; other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use; body mass index; environmental tobacco smoke exposure; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometriosis; menopausal hormone therapy use; physical inactivity; smoking status; and talc use. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the relationship between each exposure and survival was assessed in 50% of the data. A weighted inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) was developed, and its association with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models in the remaining 50% of the data.ResultsThere was a statistically significant trend of increasing risk of death per quartile of the IRRS [HR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.14]. Women in the upper quartile of the IRRS had a 31% higher death rate compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI, 1.11-1.54).ConclusionsA higher prediagnosis IRRS was associated with an increased mortality risk after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether postdiagnosis exposures are also associated with survival.ImpactGiven that pre- and postdiagnosis exposures are often correlated and many are modifiable, our study results can ultimately motivate the development of behavioral recommendations to enhance survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Published
2022

42. PredictCBC-2.0: a contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model developed and validated in ~ 200,000 patients

Author

Giardiello, Daniele, Hooning, Maartje J, Hauptmann, Michael, Keeman, Renske, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, BAM, Becher, Heiko, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Camp, Nicola J, Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine D, Flyger, Henrik, García-Closas, Montserrat, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hopper, John L, Jakubowska, Anna, Leeuwen, Floor E, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Nevanlinna, Heli, Nevelsteen, Ines, Pelders, Saskia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Siesling, Sabine, Southey, Melissa C, van der Hout, Annemieke H, van Hest, Liselotte P, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Hall, Per, Easton, Douglas F, Steyerberg, Ewout W, and Schmidt, Marjanka K

Subjects
Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Mastectomy, Prophylactic Mastectomy, Germ-Line Mutation, Risk Factors, Contralateral breast cancer, Risk prediction, Contralateral preventive mastectomy, Clinical decision-making, Breast cancer genetic predisposition, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, BCAC, Prediction performance, BRCA1/2 germline mutation, Polygenic risk score, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundPrediction of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk is challenging due to moderate performances of the known risk factors. We aimed to improve our previous risk prediction model (PredictCBC) by updated follow-up and including additional risk factors.MethodsWe included data from 207,510 invasive breast cancer patients participating in 23 studies. In total, 8225 CBC events occurred over a median follow-up of 10.2 years. In addition to the previously included risk factors, PredictCBC-2.0 included CHEK2 c.1100delC, a 313 variant polygenic risk score (PRS-313), body mass index (BMI), and parity. Fine and Gray regression was used to fit the model. Calibration and a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years were assessed to determine the performance of the models. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net benefit of PredictCBC-2.0 and previous PredictCBC models.ResultsThe discrimination of PredictCBC-2.0 at 10 years was higher than PredictCBC with an AUC of 0.65 (95% prediction intervals (PI) 0.56-0.74) versus 0.63 (95%PI 0.54-0.71). PredictCBC-2.0 was well calibrated with an observed/expected ratio at 10 years of 0.92 (95%PI 0.34-2.54). Decision curve analysis for contralateral preventive mastectomy (CPM) showed the potential clinical utility of PredictCBC-2.0 between thresholds of 4 and 12% 10-year CBC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers.ConclusionsAdditional genetic information beyond BRCA1/2 germline mutations improved CBC risk prediction and might help tailor clinical decision-making toward CPM or alternative preventive strategies. Identifying patients who benefit from CPM, especially in the general breast cancer population, remains challenging.

Published
2022

43. Germline variants and breast cancer survival in patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Author

Escala-Garcia, Maria, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Beesley, Jonathan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Geisler, Jürgen, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jacot, William, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pharoah, Paul DP, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, Romero, Atocha, Roylance, Rebecca, Rüdiger, Thomas, Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Thomas, Emilie, Tomlinson, Ian, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, and Wolk, Alicja

Subjects
kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract

Breast cancer metastasis accounts for most of the deaths from breast cancer. Identification of germline variants associated with survival in aggressive types of breast cancer may inform understanding of breast cancer progression and assist treatment. In this analysis, we studied the associations between germline variants and breast cancer survival for patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis. We used data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) including 1062 women of European ancestry with metastatic breast cancer, 606 of whom died of breast cancer. We identified two germline variants on chromosome 1, rs138569520 and rs146023652, significantly associated with breast cancer-specific survival (P = 3.19 × 10-8 and 4.42 × 10-8). In silico analysis suggested a potential regulatory effect of the variants on the nearby target genes SDE2 and H3F3A. However, the variants showed no evidence of association in a smaller replication dataset. The validation dataset was obtained from the SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study and included 293 patients with metastatic primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Ultimately, larger replication studies are needed to confirm the identified associations.

Published
2021

44. Identification of a Locus Near ULK1 Associated With Progression-Free Survival in Ovarian Cancer

Author

Quinn, Michael CJ, McCue, Karen, Shi, Wei, Johnatty, Sharon E, Beesley, Jonathan, Civitarese, Andrew, O'Mara, Tracy A, Glubb, Dylan M, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Armasu, Sebastian M, Ong, Jue-Sheng, Gharahkhani, Puya, Lu, Yi, Gao, Bo, Patch, Ann-Marie, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Garcia, Maria J, Goodman, Marc T, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, du Bois, Andreas, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Bauman, Klaus, Group, for the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M, Larson, Melissa C, McCauley, Bryan M, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Riggan, Marjorie J, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bjorge, Line, Webb, Penelope M, Group, for the OPAL Study, Friedlander, Michael, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Glasspool, Rosalind, May, Taymaa, Ene, Gabrielle EV, Huntsman, David G, Woo, Michelle, Carney, Michael E, Hinsley, Samantha, Heitz, Florian, Fereday, Sian, Kennedy, Catherine J, Edwards, Stacey L, Winham, Stacey J, deFazio, Anna, Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul DP, Goode, Ellen L, MacGregor, Stuart, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Autophagy-Related Protein-1 Homolog, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Knockout Techniques, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Progression-Free Survival, AGO Study Group, OPAL Study Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundMany loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy.ResultsWe found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10-8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.34; P = 1.47 × 10-8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro.ConclusionsThe locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association.ImpactThis finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options.See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604.

Published
2021

45. FANCM missense variants and breast cancer risk: a case-control association study of 75,156 European women

Author

Figlioli, Gisella, Billaud, Amandine, Ahearn, Thomas U., Antonenkova, Natalia N., Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W., Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blok, Marinus J., Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bonanni, Bernardo, Burwinkel, Barbara, Camp, Nicola J., Campbell, Archie, Castelao, Jose E., Cessna, Melissa H., Chanock, Stephen J., Czene, Kamila, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A., Figueroa, Jonine D., Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, González-Neira, Anna, Grassmann, Felix, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Hahnen, Eric, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A., He, Wei, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Howell, Anthony, Humphreys, Keith, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kristensen, Vessela N., Lindblom, Annika, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Newman, William G., Obi, Nadia, Panayiotidis, Mihalis I., Rashid, Muhammad U., Rhenius, Valerie, Rookus, Matti A., Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmutzler, Rita K., Shah, Mitul, Sironen, Reijo, Southey, Melissa C., Suvanto, Maija, Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M., Tomlinson, Ian, Truong, Thérèse, van der Kolk, Lizet E., van Veen, Elke M., Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Yang, Xiaohong R., Bolla, Manjeet K., Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M., Easton, Douglas F., Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Wang, Qin, Adank, Muriel A., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Andrulis, Irene L., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Nevanlinna, Heli, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Evans, D. Gareth, Milne, Roger L., Radice, Paolo, and Peterlongo, Paolo

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer‐specific survival

Author

Anna Morra, Maartje A. C. Schreurs, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton‐Culver, Annelie Augustinsson, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Hiltrud Brauch, Annegien Broeks, Saundra S. Buys, Nicola J. Camp, Jose E. Castelao, Melissa H. Cessna, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Wendy K. Chung, NBCS Collaborators, Sarah V. Colonna, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Joe Dennis, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Alison M. Dunning, Miriam Dwek, Douglas F. Easton, Diana M. Eccles, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Tanja N. Fehm, Jonine D. Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago‐Dominguez, Montserrat García‐Closas, José A. García‐Sáenz, Jeanine Genkinger, Felix Grassmann, Melanie Gündert, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Ute Hamann, Patricia A. Harrington, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Richard S. Houlston, Anthony Howell, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Helena Jernström, Esther M. John, Nichola Johnson, Michael E. Jones, Vessela N. Kristensen, Allison W. Kurian, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Jan Lubiński, Michael P. Lux, Arto Mannermaa, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Anna Marie Mulligan, Taru A. Muranen, Heli Nevanlinna, Ines Nevelsteen, Patrick Neven, William G. Newman, Nadia Obi, Kenneth Offit, Andrew F. Olshan, Tjoung‐Won Park‐Simon, Alpa V. Patel, Paolo Peterlongo, Kelly‐Anne Phillips, Dijana Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Eric C. Polley, Nadege Presneau, Katri Pylkäs, Brigitte Rack, Paolo Radice, Muhammad U. Rashid, Valerie Rhenius, Mark Robson, Atocha Romero, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Rita K. Schmutzler, Sabine Schuetze, Christopher Scott, Mitul Shah, Snezhana Smichkoska, Melissa C. Southey, William J. Tapper, Lauren R. Teras, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Ian Tomlinson, Melissa A. Troester, Celine M. Vachon, Elke M. vanVeen, Qin Wang, Camilla Wendt, Hans Wildiers, Robert Winqvist, Argyrios Ziogas, Per Hall, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Muriel A. Adank, Antoinette Hollestelle, Marjanka K. Schmidt, and Maartje J. Hooning

Subjects
CHEK2 c.1100delC germline genetic variant, contralateral breast cancer risk, radiotherapy, survival, systemic treatment, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract Background Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC‐specific survival (BCSS) compared to non‐carriers. Aim To assessed the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS. Methods Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with a first primary invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow‐up was 9.1 years. Differential associations with treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi‐state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death. Results There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status. The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.55–0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi‐state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non‐carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR (95% CI): 1.30 (1.09–1.56)]. Conclusion Systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

47. A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry

Author

Pooja Middha, Xiaoliang Wang, Sabine Behrens, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Paul L. Auer, Annelie Augustinsson, Thaïs Baert, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Stig E. Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Angel Carracedo, Jose E. Castelao, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, CTS Consortium, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Laure Dossus, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, A. Heather Eliassen, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine D. Figueroa, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Graham G. Giles, Anna González-Neira, Felix Grassmann, Anne Grundy, Pascal Guénel, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Susan E. Hankinson, Elaine F. Harkness, Bernd Holleczek, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Richard S. Houlston, Anthony Howell, David J. Hunter, Christian Ingvar, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Karolin Isaksson, Helena Jernström, Esther M. John, Michael E. Jones, Rudolf Kaaks, Renske Keeman, Cari M. Kitahara, Yon-Dschun Ko, Stella Koutros, Allison W. Kurian, James V. Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Nicole L. Larson, Susanna Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Shuai Li, Martha Linet, Jolanta Lissowska, Maria Elena Martinez, Tabea Maurer, Anna Marie Mulligan, Claire Mulot, Rachel A. Murphy, William G. Newman, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Aaron Norman, Katie M. O’Brien, Janet E. Olson, Alpa V. Patel, Ross Prentice, Erika Rees-Punia, Gad Rennert, Valerie Rhenius, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Dale P. Sandler, Christopher G. Scott, Mitul Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Ann Smeets, Melissa C. Southey, Jennifer Stone, Rulla M. Tamimi, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Sophia S. Wang, Clarice R. Weinberg, Hans Wildiers, Walter Willett, Stacey J. Winham, Alicja Wolk, Xiaohong R. Yang, M. Pilar Zamora, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Montserrat García-Closas, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Peter Kraft, Roger L. Milne, Sara Lindström, Douglas F. Easton, and Jenny Chang-Claude

Subjects
Breast cancer, Gene-environment interactions, Genetic epidemiology, European ancestry, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract Background Genome-wide studies of gene–environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. Methods Analyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene–environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs. Results Assuming a 1 × 10–5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis identifies six breast cancer loci in African and European ancestry women.

Author

Adedokun, Babatunde, Du, Zhaohui, Gao, Guimin, Ahearn, Thomas U, Lunetta, Kathryn L, Zirpoli, Gary, Figueroa, Jonine, John, Esther M, Bernstein, Leslie, Zheng, Wei, Hu, Jennifer J, Ziegler, Regina G, Nyante, Sarah, Bandera, Elisa V, Ingles, Sue A, Press, Michael F, Deming-Halverson, Sandra L, Rodriguez-Gil, Jorge L, Yao, Song, Ogundiran, Temidayo O, Ojengbede, Oladosu, Blot, William, Troester, Melissa A, Nathanson, Katherine L, Hennis, Anselm, Nemesure, Barbara, Ambs, Stefan, Fiorica, Peter N, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Bensen, Jeannette T, Kushi, Lawrence H, Torres-Mejia, Gabriela, Hu, Donglei, Fejerman, Laura, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Pharoah, Paul DP, Wang, Qin, Sandler, Dale P, Taylor, Jack A, O'Brien, Katie M, Kitahara, Cari M, Falusi, Adeyinka G, Babalola, Chinedum, Yarney, Joel, Awuah, Baffour, Addai-Wiafe, Beatrice, GBHS Study Team, Chanock, Stephen J, Olshan, Andrew F, Ambrosone, Christine B, Conti, David V, Ziv, Elad, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Palmer, Julie R, Haiman, Christopher A, and Huo, Dezheng

Subjects
GBHS Study Team, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Introns, African Continental Ancestry Group, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract

Our study describes breast cancer risk loci using a cross-ancestry GWAS approach. We first identify variants that are associated with breast cancer at P

Published
2021

49. Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer.

Author

Kar, Siddhartha P, Considine, Daniel PC, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Plummer, Jasmine T, Chen, Stephanie, Dezem, Felipe S, Barbeira, Alvaro N, Rajagopal, Padma S, Rosenow, Will T, Moreno, Fernando, Bodelon, Clara, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, deFazio, Anna, Dörk, Thilo, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fountzilas, George, Goode, Ellen L, Hartman, Mikael, Heitz, Florian, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Li, Jingmei, Liebrich, Clemens, May, Taymaa, Olsson, Håkan, Permuth, Jennifer B, Peterlongo, Paolo, Radice, Paolo, Ramus, Susan J, Riggan, Marjorie J, Risch, Harvey A, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Simard, Jacques, Szafron, Lukasz M, Titus, Linda, Thompson, Cheryl L, Vierkant, Robert A, Winham, Stacey J, Zheng, Wei, Doherty, Jennifer A, Berchuck, Andrew, Lawrenson, Kate, Im, Hae Kyung, Manichaikul, Ani W, Pharoah, Paul DP, Gayther, Simon A, and Schildkraut, Joellen M

Subjects
Biotechnology, Genetics, Prevention, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract

Familial, sequencing, and genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and genetic correlation analyses have progressively unraveled the shared or pleiotropic germline genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to leverage this shared germline genetics to improve the power of transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) to identify candidate breast cancer and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. We built gene expression prediction models using the PrediXcan method in 681 breast and 295 ovarian tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas and 211 breast and 99 ovarian normal tissue samples from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project and integrated these with GWAS meta-analysis data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (122,977 cases/105,974 controls) and the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (22,406 cases/40,941 controls). The integration was achieved through application of a pleiotropy-guided conditional/conjunction false discovery rate (FDR) approach in the setting of a TWASs. This identified 14 candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes spanning 11 genomic regions and 8 candidate ovarian cancer susceptibility genes spanning 5 genomic regions at conjunction FDR < 0.05 that were >1 Mb away from known breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility loci. We also identified 38 candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes and 17 candidate ovarian cancer susceptibility genes at conjunction FDR < 0.05 at known breast and/or ovarian susceptibility loci. The 22 genes identified by our cross-cancer analysis represent promising candidates that further elucidate the role of the transcriptome in mediating germline breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Published
2021

50. Genetically predicted circulating concentrations of micronutrients and risk of colorectal cancer among individuals of European descent: a Mendelian randomization study

Author

Tsilidis, Konstantinos K, Papadimitriou, Nikos, Dimou, Niki, Gill, Dipender, Lewis, Sarah J, Martin, Richard M, Murphy, Neil, Markozannes, Georgios, Zuber, Verena, Cross, Amanda J, Burrows, Kimberley, Lopez, David S, Key, Timothy J, Travis, Ruth C, Perez-Cornago, Aurora, Hunter, David J, van Duijnhoven, Fränzel JB, Albanes, Demetrius, Arndt, Volker, Berndt, Sonja I, Bézieau, Stéphane, Bishop, D Timothy, Boehm, Juergen, Brenner, Hermann, Burnett-Hartman, Andrea, Campbell, Peter T, Casey, Graham, Castellví-Bel, Sergi, Chan, Andrew T, Chang-Claude, Jenny, de la Chapelle, Albert, Figueiredo, Jane C, Gallinger, Steven J, Giles, Graham G, Goodman, Phyllis J, Gsur, Andrea, Hampe, Jochen, Hampel, Heather, Hoffmeister, Michael, Jenkins, Mark A, Keku, Temitope O, Kweon, Sun-Seog, Larsson, Susanna C, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Christopher I, Li, Li, Lindblom, Annika, Martín, Vicente, Milne, Roger L, Moreno, Victor, Nan, Hongmei, Nassir, Rami, Newcomb, Polly A, Offit, Kenneth, Pharoah, Paul DP, Platz, Elizabeth A, Potter, John D, Qi, Lihong, Rennert, Gad, Sakoda, Lori C, Schafmayer, Clemens, Slattery, Martha L, Snetselaar, Linda, Schenk, Jeanette, Thibodeau, Stephen N, Ulrich, Cornelia M, Van Guelpen, Bethany, Harlid, Sophia, Visvanathan, Kala, Vodickova, Ludmila, Wang, Hansong, White, Emily, Wolk, Alicja, Woods, Michael O, Wu, Anna H, Zheng, Wei, Bueno-de-Mesquita, Bas, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Hughes, David J, Jakszyn, Paula, Kühn, Tilman, Palli, Domenico, Riboli, Elio, Giovannucci, Edward L, Banbury, Barbara L, Gruber, Stephen B, Peters, Ulrike, Gunter, Marc J, and on behalf of GECCO, CORECT

Subjects
Complementary and Integrative Health, Digestive Diseases, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Cancer, Colo-Rectal Cancer, Prevention, Nutrition, Prevention of disease and conditions, and promotion of well-being, 3.3 Nutrition and chemoprevention, Case-Control Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Dietary Supplements, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Micronutrients, Risk Factors, Selenium, Vitamin B 12, White People, Mendelian randomization, genes, nutrition, supplements, colorectal cancer, Engineering, Medical and Health Sciences, Nutrition & Dietetics
Abstract

BackgroundThe literature on associations of circulating concentrations of minerals and vitamins with risk of colorectal cancer is limited and inconsistent. Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support the efficacy of dietary modification or nutrient supplementation for colorectal cancer prevention is also limited.ObjectivesTo complement observational and RCT findings, we investigated associations of genetically predicted concentrations of 11 micronutrients (β-carotene, calcium, copper, folate, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, selenium, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, and zinc) with colorectal cancer risk using Mendelian randomization (MR).MethodsTwo-sample MR was conducted using 58,221 individuals with colorectal cancer and 67,694 controls from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium, Colorectal Cancer Transdisciplinary Study, and Colon Cancer Family Registry. Inverse variance-weighted MR analyses were performed with sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of potential violations of MR assumptions.ResultsNominally significant associations were noted for genetically predicted iron concentration and higher risk of colon cancer [ORs per SD (ORSD): 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.17; P value = 0.05] and similarly for proximal colon cancer, and for vitamin B-12 concentration and higher risk of colorectal cancer (ORSD: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.21; P value = 0.01) and similarly for colon cancer. A nominally significant association was also noted for genetically predicted selenium concentration and lower risk of colon cancer (ORSD: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; P value = 0.05) and similarly for distal colon cancer. These associations were robust to sensitivity analyses. Nominally significant inverse associations were observed for zinc and risk of colorectal and distal colon cancers, but sensitivity analyses could not be performed. None of these findings survived correction for multiple testing. Genetically predicted concentrations of β-carotene, calcium, copper, folate, magnesium, phosphorus, and vitamin B-6 were not associated with disease risk.ConclusionsThese results suggest possible causal associations of circulating iron and vitamin B-12 (positively) and selenium (inversely) with risk of colon cancer.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results