Search

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided practice-changing outcomes in treating many cancers, ICI-related gastrointestinal toxicity can limit their use. Upper gastrointestinal toxicity is not common nor as well described as lower gastrointestinal toxicity. We aimed to characterize the clinical presentation, endoscopic and histologic features, treatment response, and outcomes of ICI-related esophagitis. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in whom esophagitis developed after receiving ICIs from June 2011 through January 2020. We included patients with endoscopic evidence of esophagitis and excluded those with other obvious causes of esophagitis. A chi-square test was used to assess associations between categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between continuous variables. Results: Of 657 consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during or within 6 months of completing ICI-based therapy, 21 (3%) had esophagitis deemed to be from ICIs. Of these patients, 1 (5%) received an inhibitor of CTLA-4 alone, 15 (71%) received anti–PD-1 or PD-L1 monotherapy, and 5 (24%) received a combination of these. Median time from ICI initiation to onset of esophagitis was 4 months. Upon evaluation with EGD, only 3 patients (14%) had isolated esophageal involvement; 18 (86%) had concurrent involvement of the stomach, duodenum, or both. Most patients (67%) were treated with proton pump inhibitors, and 4 (19%) received steroids (prednisone or budesonide). The mortality rate was 38% (median follow-up, 15 months). Conclusions: Esophagitis associated with ICI use is rare. The diagnosis is one of exclusion because its clinical presentation appears similar to that of inflammation resulting from other causes. It often occurs in conjunction with other upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Symptoms are mild and respond well to nonimmunosuppressive treatment, with few severe complications.

Previous studies evaluating self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for management of malignant extrinsic colon obstruction have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the efficacy of uncovered SEMS for extrinsic colon malignancy (ECM) versus intrinsic colon malignancy (ICM). Retrospective review of all patients referred for colonic SEMS at a tertiary cancer center between 2007 and 2018 was performed. Primary outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, intervention rate, and overall survival. 138 patients with ECM and 119 patients with ICM underwent attempted stent placement. The rectum and/or sigmoid colon was the most common stricture site. Technical success was lower in the ECM group [86% vs 96% (p = .009)]. Clinical success was lower in the ECM group both at 7 days [82% vs 95% (p = .004)] and at 90 days [60% vs 86% (p

Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is increasingly used for the treatment of large colonic polyps (≥ 20 mm). A drawback of EMR is local adenoma recurrence. Therefore, we studied the impact of argon plasma coagulation (APC) of the EMR edge on local adenoma recurrence. Patients and methods This was a retrospective study of patients with laterally spreading tumors (LST) ≥ 20 mm, who underwent EMR from January 2009 to August 2018 and follow-up endoscopic assessment. A cap-fitted endoscope was used to assess completeness of resection by systematically inspecting the EMR defect for any macroscopic disease. This was followed by forced APC of the resection edge followed by clip closure of the defect. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed at 6 months after resection to detect recurrence. Results Two hundred forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were female (53 %) and white (80 %), with a Median age of 64 years. Median polyp size was 35 mm (interquartile range, 30–45 mm). Most polyps were located in the right colon (77 %) and were removed by piecemeal EMR (70 %). Eleven patients (5 %) had residual tumor at the resection site. Conclusions We observed low adenoma recurrence after argon plasma coagulation of the EMR edge with a cap fitted colonoscope in patients with LST ≥ 20 mm of the colon, which requires further validation in a randomized controlled study.

Background: Screening for colonic neoplasia has decreased the incidence of colorectal cancer in the United States in the past two decades. Whether personal history of noncolorectal cancer is a risk factor for colonic neoplasia has not been well studied. We assessed the risk of colorectal neoplasia in noncolorectal cancer survivors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who had undergone colonoscopy for any indication between 2009 and 2018. Colonic adenoma detection rate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to assess for the primary outcomes of the study. Results: The study included 9408 cancer patients and 3295 control patients. Colonic adenomas were detected in 4503 cancer patients (48%) and 950 cancer-free patients (29%). Histologic examination of these adenomas revealed tubulovillous features in 620 patients (5%) and villous in 153 (1%). High-grade dysplasia was detected in 1611 patients (13%). Invasive colorectal adenocarcinoma was detected in 455 patients (12%); this rate was highest in patients with multiple myeloma (14%). Multivariate analysis revealed that a personal history of noncolorectal cancer was associated with increased risk of adenoma (Odd ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.84-2.26; P

We present our experience and established management strategy for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing suspected pancreatic neoplasms at a tertiary referral cancer hospital.Relevant data were extracted from our database for patients who underwent EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic neoplasms at our institution between 2007 and 2016.Among the 309 patients, the median age was 67 years and 56% were men. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (37%) and jaundice (29%). Concordance between radiographic diagnosis and final pathology was 89%. The mean lesion size was 34.9 mm on computed tomography and 31.5 mm on EUS. There were 197 patients (64%) with localized disease, of whom 115 (58%) had resectable lesions, 61 (31%) had borderline resectable, and 21 (11%) had unresectable lesions (mean CA 19-9 levels 1705 U/mL, 2490 U/mL, and 479 U/mL, respectively). A median of 3 FNA passes were performed to establish a pathologic diagnosis. Two patients (1%) had postprocedural adverse events. Median overall survival was 47 months in those who underwent surgery after EUS and 12 months in those who did not (P0.001).A multidisciplinary approach is employed for management of suspected pancreatic neoplasm at our tertiary cancer center. A combination of cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA serves as a highly effective duo in establishing a tissue diagnosis and staging with a low adverse event rate. Counterintuitively, CA 19-9 is not necessarily higher with resectable lesions than with unresectable lesions, indicating the limitation of CA 19-9 as a pancreatic tumor marker.

Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is safe and cost-effective in management of patients with colon polyps. However, very little is known about the actions of the referring endoscopist following identification of these lesions at index colonoscopy, and the impact of those actions on the outcome of subsequent referral for EMR. The aim of this study was to identify practices at index colonoscopy that lead to failure of subsequent EMR. Patients and methods Two hundred and eighty-nine consecutive patients with biopsy-proven non-malignant colon polyps (> 20 mm) referred for EMR were analyzed to identify practices that could be improved from the time of identifying the lesion at index colonoscopy until completion of therapy. Results EMR was abandoned at colonoscopy at the EMR center in 71 of 289 patients (24.6 %). Reasons for abandoning EMR included diagnosis of invasive carcinoma (n = 9; 12.7 %), tethered lesions (n = 21; 29.6 %) from prior endoscopic interventions, and overly large (n = 22; 31 %) and inaccessible lesions (n = 17; 24 %) for complete and safe resection whose details were not recorded in the referring endoscopy report, or polyposis syndromes (n = 2; 2.8 %) that were not recognized. Conclusions In our practice, one in four EMR attempts were abandoned as a result of inadequate diagnosis or management by the referring endoscopist, which could be improved by education on optical diagnosis of polyps, comprehensive documentation of the procedure and avoidance of interventions that preclude resection.

Background and Aims The management of ampullary adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is challenging due to multiple adenomas in the duodenum, history of previous major abdominal surgery, and desmoid lesions. In this study, we aim to define the optimum management for ampullary adenomas, particularly in FAP. Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients with pathology-confirmed ampullary adenomas in M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 2002 to 2018. Relevant data were extracted, including patient demographics, treatments, outcomes, and adverse events. Results There were 137 patients with ampullary adenomas who underwent 159 procedures; 95 of the 137 patients had FAP and were placed under close observation, 29 underwent endoscopic ampullectomy, 4 underwent surgical ampullectomy, and 31 underwent panreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the close observation group, 12.6% progressed to advanced adenoma and subsequently underwent resection. There was no ampullary cancer detected in this group. The endoscopic ampullectomy group had a postprocedure adverse event rate of 10.2%. Eleven patients had residual/recurrent disease after endoscopic ampullectomy, 3 of whom needed surgery. Four patients underwent initial surgical ampullectomy and 2 subsequently needed PD. Patients who underwent PD had an adverse event rate of 29%. In this group, there were no cases of residual disease or recurrence. Conclusions The management of ampullary adenomas in FAP should be carefully considered for the best outcome. Although these patients can be managed by endoscopic ampullectomy, careful surveillance for recurrence should be followed along with prompt management of the recurrence when detected. Although PD provides a definitive treatment, it is limited by the patient’s comorbid conditions and high adverse event rates.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating many malignancies. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events are commonly reported; however, few reports describe upper GI tract toxic effects. We aimed to describe clinical features of upper GI injury related to ICI. Methods: We studied consecutive patients who received ICIs between April 2011 and March 2018 and developed upper GI symptoms requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results: Sixty patients developed upper GI symptoms between ICI initiation and 6 months after the last infusion. Among patients who had both EGD and colonoscopy (n = 38), 21 had endoscopic evidence of inflammation involving both the upper and lower GI tract. Overall, histological signs of inflammation of the stomach were evident in 83% of patients, but inflammation of the duodenum in 38%. Total of 42 patients had other risk factors of gastritis, i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Only isolated gastric inflammation was seen on endoscopy in patients without these risk factors. The rates of ulceration were similar in the cohorts with and without other risk factors for gastritis. Isolated upper GI inflammation was related to anti-PD-1/L1 in 47% of patients. Immunosuppressive therapy in our cohort with upper GI toxicity consisted of steroids (42%) and infliximab or vedolizumab (23%). Most isolated upper GI symptoms were treated with proton pump inhibitors (65%) or H2 blockers (35%). Conclusion: We observed a correlation between ICI use and onset of upper GI inflammation even when other risk factors were excluded. Gastric involvement was evident more often than duodenal involvement on endoscopic and histological level.

Patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) are frequently referred for colonoscopy to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms during their treatment course. Here, we described the rate of colonic adenomas in patients with NHL. This was a retrospective study of patients with NHL who underwent colonoscopy after being diagnosed with NHL between January 2000 and December 2017. Of the 17,938 patients who had been diagnosed with NHL in the study period, 2176 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of colonoscopy was 61 years. Most patients were male (61%). Overall, 1273 polyps were detected in 811 patients (37%). Sessile serrated adenomas were detected in 102 (5%) patients. The overall ADR was 12% in patients younger than 40 years of age (n = 103), 26% in patients aged 40–50 (n = 251), 34% in patients aged 51–60 (n = 630), and 43% in patients older than 60 (n = 1212). Most polyps were located in the right colon (63%), and 101 (8%) were larger than 1 cm. Villous adenomatous features were present in 1% of polyps, while high-grade dysplasia was detected in 22%. Invasive adenocarcinoma was identified in 4%. The median interval from lymphoma diagnosis to adenoma detection was 1.4 years (interquartile range 0.5–3.8 years). A repeat colonoscopy was performed in 343 patients. The overall ADR on repeat colonoscopy was 30%. Cox regression analysis revealed that age (hazards ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.05; P

Background The risk of colorectal neoplasia in breast cancer survivors is unclear. This study aimed to determine the colonic adenoma detection rate (ADR) in patients with breast cancer. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with breast cancer who underwent a colonoscopy between 2000 and 2017. A control group (n=3295), comprising cancer-free patients undergoing their first screening colonoscopy, was used for comparison. Results Of 62,820 breast cancer patients, 3304 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of first colonoscopy was 59 years. ADR was 55%; 1803 patients had adenomas. High-grade dysplasia was evident in 28% of polyps and invasive adenocarcinoma was detected in 172 patients (5%). The median time from breast cancer diagnosis to adenoma detection was 3 years. The ADR was 21% in patients aged

64 Background: Patients with sporadic young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) are postulated to have a more biologically active colorectum prone to malignant transformation earlier in life. It is unknown whether there is elevated risk for metachronous colorectal pathology after the index cancer. We aimed to define this risk, to inform their post-resection endoscopic surveillance. Methods: Consecutive CRC patients (aged 18-50, n = 728) were prospectively followed after surgical resection between 2009 and 2017. Patients presenting with hereditary CRC, recurrent disease, or without endoscopy follow-up were excluded. All endoscopy records were subjected to natural language processing and further reviewed. Metachronous colorectal pathology of interest included: high-risk adenoma (≥1cm in size, > 3 in number, or tubulovillious/high-grade dysplasia histology), second CRC, and endoscopically detectable local recurrence. Results: During a 48-month (median) follow-up, 457 patients underwent 1,192 person-years of colonoscopic follow-up. The median age at CRC diagnosis was 44 years. Disease arose from the proximal colon in 9.4%, distal colon in 23.0% and rectum in 67.6%, and was stages I/II in 191 (41.8%), III in 185 (40.4%), and IV in 81 (17.7%). The majority (95.8%) underwent segmental resection, while the remainder had extended resections for synchronous pathology not amendable to preoperative endoscopic clearance. The overall incidence of metachronous pathology was 32 per 1000 person-years: 31 patients developed high-risk adenomas (6.8%), 1 had a second CRC (0.2%), and 7 had luminal recurrences (1.5%). The median time to metachronous pathology was 13.9 (IQR: 11.8-33.1) months, with 21 (53.8%) detected between 12 and 48 months post-resection. Conclusions: For young-onset CRC survivors, the incidence of metachronous colorectal pathology was 32 per 1000 person-years of follow-up. Given the time pattern of detection, adding an interval colonoscopy between the current recommended post-resection surveillance at 12 and 48 months may be beneficial. [Table: see text]

Background Cancer patients are susceptible to recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) that is increasing globally, necessitating new approaches to prevent fatal consequences. We examined the clinical characteristics of cancer patients with recurrent CDI (RCDI). Patients and methods A retrospective review of cancer patients with C. difficile-positive test between January 2015 and May 2017 was carried out. CDI was defined as diarrhea and toxigenic C. difficile detection in the stool by nucleic acid amplification test and enzyme immunoassay. Patients having two CDI episodes were categorized as single recurrent CDI (SRCDI), and those having three or more CDI episodes were categorized as multiple recurrent CDI (MRCDI). Treatment failure was defined as the requirement of antimicrobial alteration or repetition. Results We included 170 patients having 270 CDI episodes; 85 patients had non-RCDI, and 85 had RCDI; 14 of them had MRCDI. Previous hospitalization and immunosuppressant use were more frequent in MRCDI group than in SRCDI group (P=0.009 and 0.002, respectively). Physicians treated more SRCDI episodes than MRCDI episodes with metronidazole alone (P=0.017), whereas, more MRCDI episodes needed combination antimicrobials (P=0.072). The mean duration of CDI treatment was longer in the MRCDI group than in the SRCDI group (P=0.030). MRCDI was associated with treatment failure more than SRCDI (P=0.021). The risk for a recurrent episode of CDI was increased in patients who had the following features of the first CDI episode: previous use of antibiotic, NSAID, immunosuppressant, chemotherapy, comorbidities, CDI treatment failure, and severe CDI (P Conclusion Risk factors for RCDI in cancer patients are similar to those without cancer, with the exception of chemotherapy that is only given to cancer patients. Long CDI treatment and CDI treatment failure are associated with MRCDI.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are gaining increasing popularity as an efficacious treatment for advanced malignancies. ICPI treatment can be complicated by diarrhea and colitis. Systemic steroids are the first line treatment. Infliximab is reserved for severe refractory cases. We aimed to assess the impact of ICPI-induced diarrhea and colitis and their immunosuppressive treatment on patients’ outcomes. Methods This retrospective analysis was conducted in 327 cancer patients who received ICPIs between 2011 and 2017. Patients with ICPI-induced toxicities in other organs were excluded. We collected data about patient demographics, clinical variables, and overall survival. We used descriptive analysis to compare different groups based on the occurrence and the treatment of diarrhea and colitis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare overall survival durations between groups. Results Diarrhea was recorded in 117 (36%) patients; 79 (24%) of them required immunosuppressive treatment of either systemic corticosteroid without infliximab (n = 44) or with infliximab (n = 35). Caucasian ethnicity, melanoma, stage 3 cancer, and ipilimumab were predictors of colitis that requires immunosuppression. Patients who required immunosuppressants had better overall survival than those who did not require treatment for colitis or diarrhea (P 30 days) had numerically higher infection rate than those who received steroid for shorter duration (40.4 vs. 25.8%, P = 0.160). Likewise, long duration of steroid without infliximab was associated with increased risk of infection compared to short duration of steroid with infliximab (42.9% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.089). Conclusions Patients with ICPI-induced diarrhea or colitis have improved survival outcomes. Diarrhea is an independent predictor of an improved survival regardless of treatment requirement. Immunosuppressive treatment for diarrhea did not significantly affect overall survival, however, infection rates were numerically higher among patients who received steroids for a long duration. Therefore, early non-steroid immunosuppressive therapy may ensure a more favorable overall outcome.

Background Diarrhea and colitis are the second most common immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI)-induced adverse events. However, a comprehensive characterization of the endoscopic and histologic features of ICPI-induced diarrhea and colitis is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to describe endoscopic and histologic features of ICPI-induced gastrointestinal toxicities and to assess their association with patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 53 patients with ICPI-related diarrhea/colitis between 2011 and 2017. We collected data on demographics, diarrhea/colitis grade, treatment, and endoscopic and histologic findings. Long-term follow-up included repeat endoscopy findings, diarrhea recurrence, and overall survival. We compared groups by treatment, endoscopic and histologic findings, and constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results Most patients had grade 2 or higher diarrhea (87%) and colitis (60%). Thirty-one patients were successfully treated with corticosteroids, and 22 additionally required infliximab. On endoscopy, 21 (40%) patients had ulcerations and 22 (42%) had nonulcerative inflammation. Patients with ulcerations had more steroid-refractory disease (P = 0.044) and high-grade diarrhea (P = 0.033). Histology showed mostly acute (23%) or chronic (60%) inflammation. During mean follow-up duration of 18.9 months, 19 (36%) developed recurrent diarrhea. Most patients had persistent endoscopic (8/13, 62%) and histologic (9/11, 82%) inflammation. Patients with higher-grade adverse events had improved survival. Higher-grade colitis was associated with endoscopic inflammation (P = 0.039), but grade of diarrhea was not associated with endoscopic inflammation or grade of colitis. Conclusion 10.1093/ibd/izy104_video1izy104.video15808053084001.

Background and Aims The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality metric tied to interval colon cancer occurrence. However, manual extraction of data to calculate and track the ADR in clinical practice is labor-intensive. To overcome this difficulty, we developed a natural language processing (NLP) method to identify adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) in patients undergoing their first screening colonoscopy. We compared the NLP-generated results with that of manual data extraction to test the accuracy of NLP and report on colonoscopy quality metrics using NLP. Methods Identification of screening colonoscopies using NLP was compared with that using the manual method for 12,748 patients who underwent colonoscopies from July 2010 to February 2013. Also, identification of adenomas and SSAs using NLP was compared with that using the manual method with 2259 matched patient records. Colonoscopy ADRs using these methods were generated for each physician. Results NLP correctly identified 91.3% of the screening examinations, whereas the manual method identified 87.8% of them. Both the manual method and NLP correctly identified examinations of patients with adenomas and SSAs in the matched records almost perfectly. Both NLP and the manual method produced comparable values for ADRs for each endoscopist and for the group as a whole. Conclusions NLP can correctly identify screening colonoscopies, accurately identify adenomas and SSAs in a pathology database, and provide real-time quality metrics for colonoscopy.

1541 Background: In our clinical practice at a tertiary cancer center, we have observed increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) in patients with breast cancer. Here, we describe ADR in patients with breast cancer to define the appropriate timing to initiate colonoscopy screening in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with breast cancer who underwent a colonoscopy after their diagnosis of breast cancer between 2000 and 2017. A control group ( n = 3295) comprised patients without any type of cancer who underwent their first screening colonoscopy between 2008 and 2017 was used in the logistic regression. Results: Of the 62,820 patients who had a diagnosis of breast cancer, 3304 were included. The mean age was 59 years. Regarding ADR, 1803 patients (55%) had adenomas. High-grade dysplasia was evident in 28% of polyps and invasive adenocarcinoma in 172 (5%). The median time from breast cancer diagnosis to adenoma detection was 3 years (IQR 1-6). The ADR was 21% in patients younger than 40 years ( n=63), 39% in patients between 40 and 50 years ( n=314), 54% in patients between 50 and 60 years ( n=1420), and 60% in patients older than 60 years ( n=1507). ADR in patients younger than 50 years of age who do not have a family history of colorectal cancer or a body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg/m2 was 26%. A subsequent colonoscopy was performed in 831 patients who had colonic adenoma in the initial colonoscopy. The ADR was 40% in patients who had a repeat colonoscopy within 3 years, 50% within 3-5 years, and 53% > 5 years. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed an increased risk of colon adenoma with older age, male sex, higher BMI, and personal history of breast cancer ( P

e13070 Background: In the last two decades, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has decreased dramatically after the implementation of CRC screening in the United States. Several risk factors for colonic adenoma (CA), the main precursor for CRC, have been found. Whether personal history of non-colorectal cancer (NCRC) is a risk factor for CA has not been studied. Here, we assess the risk of CA in patients with NCRCs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients who underwent colonoscopy after cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2018. We included patients without history of NCRC as a control group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors for CA (Table 1). Results: Total of 9408 patients with NCRC were included; CA was detected in 4503 (48%). Histology revealed tubulovillous features in 611 (14%) patients and villous in 51 (1%). High grade dysplasia was detected in 1,317 (29%) patients and adenocarcinoma in 388 (9%). The rate of adenocarcinoma was the highest in patients with multiple myeloma (14%). Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 30% in patients younger than 40 years ( n= 1621), 32% in patients between 40 and 50 years ( n= 812), 47% in patients between 50 and 60 years ( n= 2892), and 55% in patients older than 60 years ( n= 4493). Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk of CA with old age, male sex, family history of CRC, and high body mass index ( P< 0.05). The median time from NCRC diagnosis to CA detection was 3 years (IQR 1-8). Conclusions: ADR in patients with a personal history of NCRC is higher than the ADR of patients without NCRC. CRC screening should be performed after the diagnosis of NCRC is made, even if it was before the standard threshold of CRC screening age of 50 years.[Table: see text]