Search

Background: Survivors of childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumors can develop motor and sensory impairment from their cancer and treatment history. We estimated the prevalence of motor and sensory impairment in survivors compared with controls through clinical assessment and identified associated treatment exposures and functional, quality of life (QOL), and social outcomes. Methods: Survivors of childhood CNS tumors from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (n = 378, median [range] age 24.0 [18.0–53.0] years, 43.4% female) ≥5 years from diagnosis and controls (n = 445, median [range] age 34.0 [18.0–70.0] years, 55.7% female) completed in‐person evaluation for motor and sensory impairment using the modified Total Neuropathy Score. Impairment was graded by modified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Multivariable models estimated associations between grade ≥2 motor/sensory impairment, individual/treatment characteristics, and secondary outcomes (function by Physical Performance Test, fitness by physiologic cost index, QOL by Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form‐36 physical/mental summary scores, social attainment). Results: Grade ≥2 motor or sensory impairment was more prevalent in survivors (24.1%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 19.8%–29.4%) than controls (2.9%, CI 1.4–4.5%). Among survivors, in multivariable models, motor impairment was associated with vinca exposure <15 mg/m2 versus none (OR 4.38, CI 1.06–18.08) and etoposide exposure >2036 mg/m2 versus none (OR 12.61, CI 2.19–72.72). Sensory impairment was associated with older age at diagnosis (OR 1.09, CI 1.01–1.16) and craniospinal irradiation versus none (OR 4.39, CI 1.68–11.50). There were lower odds of motor/sensory impairment in survivors treated in the year 2000 or later versus before 1990 (Motor: OR 0.29, CI 0.10–0.84, Sensory: OR 0.35, CI 0.13–0.96). Motor impairment was associated with impaired physical QOL (OR 2.64, CI 1.22–5.72). Conclusions: In survivors of childhood CNS tumors, motor and sensory impairment is prevalent by clinical assessment, especially after exposure to etoposide, vinca, or craniospinal radiation. Treating motor impairment may improve survivors' QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of seizure‐related factors on neurocognitive, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), and social outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer. Methods: Survivors of childhood cancer treated at St. Jude Children's Hospital (n = 2022; 48.3% female; median age, 31.5 years; median time since diagnosis, 23.6 years) completed neurocognitive testing and questionnaires. The presence, severity, resolution, and treatment history of seizures were abstracted from medical records. Adjusting for the age at diagnosis, sex, and prior cancer therapy, multivariable models examined the impact of seizures on neurocognitive and HRQOL outcomes. Mediation analyses were conducted for social outcomes. Results: Seizures were identified in 232 survivors (11.5%; 29.9% of survivors with central nervous system [CNS] tumors and 9.0% of those without CNS tumors). In CNS tumor survivors, seizures were associated with poorer executive function and processing speed (P <.02); in non‐CNS tumor survivors, seizures were associated with worse function in every domain (P <.05). Among non‐CNS survivors, seizure severity was associated with worse processing speed (P =.023), and resolution was associated with better executive function (P =.028) and attention (P =.044). In CNS survivors, seizure resolution was associated with improved attention (P =.047) and memory (P <.02). Mediation analysis revealed that the impact of seizures on social outcomes was mediated by neurocognitive function. Conclusions: Seizures in cancer survivors adversely affect long‐term functional and psychosocial outcomes independently of cancer therapy. The resolution of seizure occurrence is associated with better outcomes. Seizure severity is associated with poorer outcomes and should be a focus of clinical management and patient education. Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at risk for poorer cognitive, health‐related quality of life, and social outcomes. Seizure frequency, independently of the underlying etiology, is associated with poorer outcomes in non–brain tumor survivors, and this implies that they may be a more vulnerable population with a lower threshold for impact from seizures of any severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at increased risk for both treatment-related exercise intolerance and neurocognitive deficits. This analysis aimed to identify the association between exercise intolerance and neurocognitive impairments in ALL survivors.Methods: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, results from a 2-hour standardized neuropsychological assessment, and self-report questionnaires were obtained for 341 adult survivors of childhood ALL and 288 controls. Multivariable modeling was used to test associations between oxygen uptake at 85% estimated heart rate (rpkVO2 ) and neuropsychological test and self-reported questionnaire domains, adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis, cranial radiation, anthracycline, and methotrexate exposure and tobacco smoking status.Results: Compared with controls, survivors had worse rpkVO2 and performance on verbal intelligence, focused attention, verbal fluency, working memory, dominant/nondominant motor speed, visual-motor speed, memory span, and reading and math measures (all P < .001). In adjusted models, exercise intolerance was associated with decreases in performance of verbal ability, focused attention, verbal fluency, working memory, dominant motor speed, nondominant motor speed, visual-motor speed, memory span, reading academics, and math academics in survivors.Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between exercise intolerance and neurocognitive outcomes. Research is needed to determine whether interventions that improve exercise tolerance impact neurocognitive function in ALL survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neurocognitive impairments are sequelae of childhood cancer treatment, however little guidance is given to clinicians on common phenotypes of impairment, or modifiable risk factors that could lead to personalized interventions in survivorship., Methods: Standardized clinical testing of neurocognitive function was conducted in 2,958 (74.1%) eligible survivors, who were ≥5 years post-diagnosis and >18 years old, and 477 community controls. Impairment was examined across 20 measures and phenotypes were determined by latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate risk for phenotype, predicted by cancer diagnosis and treatment exposures, chronic health conditions, and lifestyle, adjusted for sex and age. Associations between phenotypes and social attainment were examined., Results: Five neurocognitive phenotypes were identified in survivors (global impairment 3.7%, impaired attention 5.0%, memory impairment 7.2%, processing speed/executive function impairment 9.3%, no impairment 74.8%). Risk of global impairment was associated with severe chronic health condition burden (odds ratio [OR]=20.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 11.41-35.63) including cerebrovascular disease (OR = 14.5, 95%CI = 5.47-38.44) and cerebrovascular accident (OR = 14.7, 95%CI = 7.50-26.40). Modifiable risk factors, like quitting smoking reduced risk for global impairment (OR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.06-0.66). Low physical activity increased risk for global impairment (OR = 4.54, 95%CI 2.86-7.21), attention impairment (OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.41-2.87), processing speed/executive function impairment (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.46-2.48), and memory impairment (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.54-2.82)., Conclusions: Results support the clinical utility of neurocognitive phenotyping to develop risk profiles and personalized clinical interventions, such as preventing cerebrovascular disease in anthracycline treated survivors by preventing hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle, to reduce the risk for global impairment., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) is characterized by deficits of speech, movement, and affect that can occur following tumor removal from the posterior fossa. The role of cerebrocerebellar tract injuries in the etiology of CMS remains unclear, with recent studies suggesting that cerebrocerebellar dysfunction may be related to chronic, rather than transient, symptomatology., Methods: We measured functional connectivity between the cerebellar cortex and functional nodes throughout the brain using fMRI acquired after tumor removal but prior to adjuvant therapy in a cohort of 70 patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma. Surgical lesions were mapped to the infratentorial anatomy, and connectivity with cerebral cortex was tested for statistical dependence on extent of cerebellar outflow pathway injury., Results: CMS diagnosis was associated with an increase in connectivity between the right cerebellar and left cerebral hemisphere, maximally between cerebellum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VM-PFC). Connectivity dependence on cerebellar outflow was significant for some speech nodes but not for VM-PFC, suggesting altered input to the cerebellum. Connectivity between posterior regions of cerebellar cortex and ipsilateral dentate nuclei was abnormal in CMS participants, maximally within the right cerebellar hemisphere., Conclusions: The functional abnormalities we identified are notably upstream of where causal surgical injury is thought to occur, indicating a secondary phenomenon. The VM-PFC is involved in several functions that may be relevant to the symptomatology of CMS, including emotional control and motor learning. We hypothesize that these abnormalities may reflect maladaptive learning within the cerebellum consequent to disordered motor and limbic function by the periaqueductal grey and other critical midbrain targets., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)