1. Cardiovascular effects of Roflumilast during sepsis: Risks or benefits?
- Author
-
Ferreira Alves G, Oliveira JG, Nakashima MA, Delfrate G, Sordi R, Assreuy J, da Silva-Santos JE, Collino M, and Fernandes D
- Subjects
- Animals, Male, Rats, Nitric Oxide metabolism, Cardiovascular System drug effects, Cardiovascular System physiopathology, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Aminopyridines pharmacology, Aminopyridines therapeutic use, Sepsis complications, Sepsis drug therapy, Cyclopropanes pharmacology, Cyclopropanes therapeutic use, Cyclopropanes administration & dosage, Benzamides pharmacology, Benzamides therapeutic use, Cyclic AMP metabolism, Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors pharmacology, Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is responsible for terminating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling. PDE4 inhibitors, such as roflumilast (RFM), have anti-inflammatory activity and have been studied in inflammation-induced tissue damage in sepsis. However, the role of RFM on cardiovascular derangements induced by sepsis is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the potential effects of RFM on cardiovascular collapse and multiorgan damage caused by sepsis., Methods: Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats. Six hours after the CLP or sham procedure, animals were randomly assigned to receive either RFM (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously, and cardiovascular parameters were assessed 24 h after the surgery and organ/plasma samples were collected for further analyses., Results: Sepsis induced hypotension, tachycardia, reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo. RFM treatment increased systemic cAMP levels and RBF. RFM also attenuated hypoperfusion and liver damage induced by CLP. Furthermore, RFM reduced systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels in septic rats, while there were no changes in hepatic NOS-2 expression. Nevertheless, RFM exacerbated sepsis-induced hypotension and tachycardia without ameliorating vascular hyporeactivity., Conclusion: Our data show that PDE-4 inhibition protects septic rats from hepatic injury and improves renal perfusion. However, RFM worsened hemodynamic parameters and showed no protection against sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Thus, despite the anti-inflammatory benefits of RFM, its application in sepsis should be approached cautiously., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest or disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF