Search

This note studies phase transitions for the existence of unregularized M-estimators under proportional asymptotics where the sample size $n$ and feature dimension $p$ grow proportionally with $n/p \to \delta \in (0, \infty)$. We study the existence of M-estimators in single-index models where the response $y_i$ depends on covariates $x_i \sim N(0, I_p)$ through an unknown index $w \in R^p$ and an unknown link function. An explicit expression is derived for the critical threshold $\delta_\infty$ that determines the phase transition for the existence of the M-estimator, generalizing the results of Cand`es and Sur (2020) for binary logistic regression to other single-index linear models. Furthermore, we investigate the existence of a solution to the nonlinear system of equations governing the asymptotic behavior of the M-estimator when it exists. The existence of solution to this system for $\delta > \delta_\infty$ remains largely unproven outside the global null in binary logistic regression. We address this gap with a proof that the system admits a solution if and only if $\delta > \delta_\infty$, providing a comprehensive theoretical foundation for proportional asymptotic results that require as a prerequisite the existence of a solution to the system., Comment: 27 pages, 2 figures

Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (ALO-CV) is a method that has been proposed to estimate the generalization error of a regularized estimator in the high-dimensional regime where dimension and sample size are of the same order, the so called ``proportional regime''. A new analysis is developed to derive the consistency of ALO-CV for non-differentiable regularizer under Gaussian covariates and strong-convexity of the regularizer. Using a conditioning argument, the difference between the ALO-CV weights and their counterparts in mean-field inference is shown to be small. Combined with upper bounds between the mean-field inference estimate and the leave-one-out quantity, this provides a proof that ALO-CV approximates the leave-one-out quantity as well up to negligible error terms. Linear models with square loss, robust linear regression and single-index models are explicitly treated.

This note develops an analysis of the Lasso \( \hat b\) in linear models without any sparsity or L1 assumption on the true regression vector, in the proportional regime where dimension \( p \) and sample \( n \) are of the same order. Under Gaussian design and covariance matrix with spectrum bounded away from 0 and $+\infty$, it is shown that the L2 risk is stochastically bounded if and only if the number of selected variables is bounded away from \( n \), in the sense that $$ (1-\|\hat b\|_0/n)^{-1} = O_P(1) \Longleftrightarrow \|\hat b- b^*\|_2 = O_P(1) $$ as \( n,p\to+\infty \). The right-to-left implication rules out constant risk for dense Lasso estimates (estimates with close to $n$ active variables), which can be used to discard tuning parameters leading to dense estimates. We then bring back sparsity in the picture, and revisit the precise phase transition characterizing the sparsity patterns of the true regression vector leading to unbounded Lasso risk -- or by the above equivalence to dense Lasso estimates. This precise phase transition was established by \citet{miolane2018distribution,celentano2020lasso} using fixed-point equations in an equivalent sequence model. An alternative proof of this phase transition is provided here using simple arguments without relying on the fixed-point equations or the equivalent sequence model. A modification of the well-known Restricted Eigenvalue argument allows to extend the analysis to any small tuning parameter of constant order, leading to a bounded risk on one side of the phase transition. On the other side of the phase transition, it is established the Lasso risk can be unbounded for a given sign pattern as soon as Basis Pursuit fails to recover that sign pattern in noiseless problems.

A casino offers the following game. There are three cups each containing a die. You are being told that the dice in the cups are all the same, but possibly nonstandard. For a bet of \$1, the game master shakes all three cups and lets you choose one of them. You win \$2 if the die in your cup displays at least the average of the other two, and you lose otherwise. Is this game fair? If not, how should the casino design the dice to maximize their profit? This problem is a special case of the following more general question: given a measurable space $X$ and a bounded measurable function $f : X^n \to \mathbb{R}$, how large can the expectation of $f$ under probability measures of the form $\mu^{\otimes n}$ be? We develop a general method to answer this kind of question. As an example application that is harder than the casino problem, we show that the maximal probability of the event $X_1 + X_2 + X_3 < 2 X_4$ for nonnegative iid random variables lies between $0.4$ and $0.422$, where the upper bound is obtained by mixed integer linear programming. We conjecture the lower bound to be the exact value., Comment: 20 pages, comments welcome

This paper studies the generalization performance of iterates obtained by Gradient Descent (GD), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and their proximal variants in high-dimensional robust regression problems. The number of features is comparable to the sample size and errors may be heavy-tailed. We introduce estimators that precisely track the generalization error of the iterates along the trajectory of the iterative algorithm. These estimators are provably consistent under suitable conditions. The results are illustrated through several examples, including Huber regression, pseudo-Huber regression, and their penalized variants with non-smooth regularizer. We provide explicit generalization error estimates for iterates generated from GD and SGD, or from proximal SGD in the presence of a non-smooth regularizer. The proposed risk estimates serve as effective proxies for the actual generalization error, allowing us to determine the optimal stopping iteration that minimizes the generalization error. Extensive simulations confirm the effectiveness of the proposed generalization error estimates., Comment: Camera-ready version of NeurIPS 2024 paper

We characterize the squared prediction risk of ensemble estimators obtained through subagging (subsample bootstrap aggregating) regularized M-estimators and construct a consistent estimator for the risk. Specifically, we consider a heterogeneous collection of $M \ge 1$ regularized M-estimators, each trained with (possibly different) subsample sizes, convex differentiable losses, and convex regularizers. We operate under the proportional asymptotics regime, where the sample size $n$, feature size $p$, and subsample sizes $k_m$ for $m \in [M]$ all diverge with fixed limiting ratios $n/p$ and $k_m/n$. Key to our analysis is a new result on the joint asymptotic behavior of correlations between the estimator and residual errors on overlapping subsamples, governed through a (provably) contractible nonlinear system of equations. Of independent interest, we also establish convergence of trace functionals related to degrees of freedom in the non-ensemble setting (with $M = 1$) along the way, extending previously known cases for square loss and ridge, lasso regularizers. When specialized to homogeneous ensembles trained with a common loss, regularizer, and subsample size, the risk characterization sheds some light on the implicit regularization effect due to the ensemble and subsample sizes $(M,k)$. For any ensemble size $M$, optimally tuning subsample size yields sample-wise monotonic risk. For the full-ensemble estimator (when $M \to \infty$), the optimal subsample size $k^\star$ tends to be in the overparameterized regime $(k^\star \le \min\{n,p\})$, when explicit regularization is vanishing. Finally, joint optimization of subsample size, ensemble size, and regularization can significantly outperform regularizer optimization alone on the full data (without any subagging)., Comment: 72 pages, 14 figures, 6 tables

This paper investigates the iterates $\hbb^1,\dots,\hbb^T$ obtained from iterative algorithms in high-dimensional linear regression problems, in the regime where the feature dimension $p$ is comparable with the sample size $n$, i.e., $p \asymp n$. The analysis and proposed estimators are applicable to Gradient Descent (GD), proximal GD and their accelerated variants such as Fast Iterative Soft-Thresholding (FISTA). The paper proposes novel estimators for the generalization error of the iterate $\hbb^t$ for any fixed iteration $t$ along the trajectory. These estimators are proved to be $\sqrt n$-consistent under Gaussian designs. Applications to early-stopping are provided: when the generalization error of the iterates is a U-shape function of the iteration $t$, the estimates allow to select from the data an iteration $\hat t$ that achieves the smallest generalization error along the trajectory. Additionally, we provide a technique for developing debiasing corrections and valid confidence intervals for the components of the true coefficient vector from the iterate $\hbb^t$ at any finite iteration $t$. Extensive simulations on synthetic data illustrate the theoretical results.

This paper studies the asymptotics of resampling without replacement in the proportional regime where dimension $p$ and sample size $n$ are of the same order. For a given dataset $(X,y)\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}\times \mathbb{R}^n$ and fixed subsample ratio $q\in(0,1)$, the practitioner samples independently of $(X,y)$ iid subsets $I_1,...,I_M$ of $\{1,...,n\}$ of size $q n$ and trains estimators $\hat{\beta}(I_1),...,\hat{\beta}(I_M)$ on the corresponding subsets of rows of $(X, y)$. Understanding the performance of the bagged estimate $\bar{\beta} = \frac1M\sum_{m=1}^M \hat{\beta}(I_1),...,\hat{\beta}(I_M)$, for instance its squared error, requires us to understand correlations between two distinct $\hat{\beta}(I_m)$ and $\hat{\beta}(I_{m'})$ trained on different subsets $I_m$ and $I_{m'}$. In robust linear regression and logistic regression, we characterize the limit in probability of the correlation between two estimates trained on different subsets of the data. The limit is characterized as the unique solution of a simple nonlinear equation. We further provide data-driven estimators that are consistent for estimating this limit. These estimators of the limiting correlation allow us to estimate the squared error of the bagged estimate $\bar{\beta}$, and for instance perform parameter tuning to choose the optimal subsample ratio $q$. As a by-product of the proof argument, we obtain the limiting distribution of the bivariate pair $(x_i^T \hat{\beta}(I_m), x_i^T \hat{\beta}(I_{m'}))$ for observations $i\in I_m\cap I_{m'}$, i.e., for observations used to train both estimates., Comment: 25 pages, 10 figures

We consider unregularized robust M-estimators for linear models under Gaussian design and heavy-tailed noise, in the proportional asymptotics regime where the sample size n and the number of features p are both increasing such that $p/n \to \gamma\in (0,1)$. An estimator of the out-of-sample error of a robust M-estimator is analysed and proved to be consistent for a large family of loss functions that includes the Huber loss. As an application of this result, we propose an adaptive tuning procedure of the scale parameter $\lambda>0$ of a given loss function $\rho$: choosing$\hat \lambda$ in a given interval $I$ that minimizes the out-of-sample error estimate of the M-estimator constructed with loss $\rho_\lambda(\cdot) = \lambda^2 \rho(\cdot/\lambda)$ leads to the optimal out-of-sample error over $I$. The proof relies on a smoothing argument: the unregularized M-estimation objective function is perturbed, or smoothed, with a Ridge penalty that vanishes as $n\to+\infty$, and show that the unregularized M-estimator of interest inherits properties of its smoothed version., Comment: 33 pages, 10 figures

Major progress has been made in the previous decade to characterize the asymptotic behavior of regularized M-estimators in high-dimensional regression problems in the proportional asymptotic regime where the sample size $n$ and the number of features $p$ are increasing simultaneously such that $n/p\to \delta \in(0,\infty)$, using powerful tools such as Approximate Message Passing or the Convex Gaussian Min-Max Theorem (CGMT). The asymptotic error and behavior of the regularized M-estimator is then typically described by a system of nonlinear equations with a few scalar unknowns, and the solution to this system precisely characterizes the asymptotic error. Application of the CGMT and related machinery requires the existence and uniqueness of a solution to this low-dimensional system of equations or to a related scalar convex minimization problem. This paper resolves the question of existence and uniqueness of solution to this low-dimensional system for the case of linear models with independent additive noise, when both the data-fitting loss function and regularizer are separable and convex. Such existence result was previously known under strong convexity or for specific estimators such as the Lasso. The main idea behind this existence result is inspired by an argument developed by Montanari et al. [2023] and Celentano et al. [2023] in different contexts: By constructing an ad-hoc convex minimization problem in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space, the existence of the Lagrange multiplier for this optimization problem makes it possible to construct explicit solutions to the low-dimensional system of interest. The conditions under which we derive this existence result exactly correspond to the side of the phase transition where perfect recovery $\hat{x} = x_0$ fails, so that these conditions are optimal., Comment: 55 pages, 5 figures

Generalized cross-validation (GCV) is a widely-used method for estimating the squared out-of-sample prediction risk that employs a scalar degrees of freedom adjustment (in a multiplicative sense) to the squared training error. In this paper, we examine the consistency of GCV for estimating the prediction risk of arbitrary ensembles of penalized least-squares estimators. We show that GCV is inconsistent for any finite ensemble of size greater than one. Towards repairing this shortcoming, we identify a correction that involves an additional scalar correction (in an additive sense) based on degrees of freedom adjusted training errors from each ensemble component. The proposed estimator (termed CGCV) maintains the computational advantages of GCV and requires neither sample splitting, model refitting, or out-of-bag risk estimation. The estimator stems from a finer inspection of the ensemble risk decomposition and two intermediate risk estimators for the components in this decomposition. We provide a non-asymptotic analysis of the CGCV and the two intermediate risk estimators for ensembles of convex penalized estimators under Gaussian features and a linear response model. Furthermore, in the special case of ridge regression, we extend the analysis to general feature and response distributions using random matrix theory, which establishes model-free uniform consistency of CGCV., Comment: 91 pages, 34 figures; this version adds general proof outlines (in Sections 4.3 and 5.3), add more experiments with non-Gaussian data (in Sections D and E), relaxes an assumption (in Section A.7), clarifies explanations at several places, and corrects minor typos at several places

This paper investigates the asymptotic distribution of the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) in multinomial logistic models in the high-dimensional regime where dimension and sample size are of the same order. While classical large-sample theory provides asymptotic normality of the MLE under certain conditions, such classical results are expected to fail in high-dimensions as documented for the binary logistic case in the seminal work of Sur and Cand\`es [2019]. We address this issue in classification problems with 3 or more classes, by developing asymptotic normality and asymptotic chi-square results for the multinomial logistic MLE (also known as cross-entropy minimizer) on null covariates. Our theory leads to a new methodology to test the significance of a given feature. Extensive simulation studies on synthetic data corroborate these asymptotic results and confirm the validity of proposed p-values for testing the significance of a given feature.

Supernovae (SNe) inject $\sim 10^{51}$ erg in the interstellar medium, thereby shocking and heating the gas. A substantial fraction of this energy is later lost via radiative cooling. We present a post-processing module for the FLASH code to calculate the cooling radiation from shock-heated gas using collisional excitation data from MAPPINGS V. When applying this tool to a simulated SN remnant (SNR), we find that most energy is emitted in the EUV. However, optical emission lines ($[$O III$]$, $[$N II$]$, $[$S II$]$, H${\alpha}$, H${\beta}$) are usually best observable. Our shock detection scheme shows that [S II] and [N II] emissions arise from the thin shell surrounding the SNR, while [O III], H$\rm \alpha$, and H$\rm \beta$ originate from the volume-filling hot gas inside the SNR bubble. We find that the optical emission lines are affected by the SNR's complex structure and its projection onto the plane of the sky because the escaping line luminosity can be reduced by 10 -- 80\% due to absorption along the line-of-sight. Additionally, the subtraction of contaminating background radiation is required for the correct classification of an SNR on the oxygen or sulphur BPT diagrams. The electron temperature and density obtained from our synthetic observations match well with the simulation but are very sensitive to the assumed metallicity., Comment: 18 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

This paper studies the multi-task high-dimensional linear regression models where the noise among different tasks is correlated, in the moderately high dimensional regime where sample size $n$ and dimension $p$ are of the same order. Our goal is to estimate the covariance matrix of the noise random vectors, or equivalently the correlation of the noise variables on any pair of two tasks. Treating the regression coefficients as a nuisance parameter, we leverage the multi-task elastic-net and multi-task lasso estimators to estimate the nuisance. By precisely understanding the bias of the squared residual matrix and by correcting this bias, we develop a novel estimator of the noise covariance that converges in Frobenius norm at the rate $n^{-1/2}$ when the covariates are Gaussian. This novel estimator is efficiently computable. Under suitable conditions, the proposed estimator of the noise covariance attains the same rate of convergence as the "oracle" estimator that knows in advance the regression coefficients of the multi-task model. The Frobenius error bounds obtained in this paper also illustrate the advantage of this new estimator compared to a method-of-moments estimator that does not attempt to estimate the nuisance. As a byproduct of our techniques, we obtain an estimate of the generalization error of the multi-task elastic-net and multi-task lasso estimators. Extensive simulation studies are carried out to illustrate the numerical performance of the proposed method.

We consider observations $(X,y)$ from single index models with unknown link function, Gaussian covariates and a regularized M-estimator $\hat\beta$ constructed from convex loss function and regularizer. In the regime where sample size $n$ and dimension $p$ are both increasing such that $p/n$ has a finite limit, the behavior of the empirical distribution of $\hat\beta$ and the predicted values $X\hat\beta$ has been previously characterized in a number of models: The empirical distributions are known to converge to proximal operators of the loss and penalty in a related Gaussian sequence model, which captures the interplay between ratio $p/n$, loss, regularization and the data generating process. This connection between$(\hat\beta,X\hat\beta)$ and the corresponding proximal operators require solving fixed-point equations that typically involve unobservable quantities such as the prior distribution on the index or the link function. This paper develops a different theory to describe the empirical distribution of $\hat\beta$ and $X\hat\beta$: Approximations of $(\hat\beta,X\hat\beta)$ in terms of proximal operators are provided that only involve observable adjustments. These proposed observable adjustments are data-driven, e.g., do not require prior knowledge of the index or the link function. These new adjustments yield confidence intervals for individual components of the index, as well as estimators of the correlation of $\hat\beta$ with the index. The interplay between loss, regularization and the model is thus captured in a data-driven manner, without solving the fixed-point equations studied in previous works. The results apply to both strongly convex regularizers and unregularized M-estimation. Simulations are provided for the square and logistic loss in single index models including logistic regression and 1-bit compressed sensing with 20\% corrupted bits.

The paper proposes chi-square and normal inference methodologies for the unknown coefficient matrix $B^*$ of size $p\times T$ in a Multi-Task (MT) linear model with $p$ covariates, $T$ tasks and $n$ observations under a row-sparse assumption on $B^*$. The row-sparsity $s$, dimension $p$ and number of tasks $T$ are allowed to grow with $n$. In the high-dimensional regime $p\ggg n$, in order to leverage row-sparsity, the MT Lasso is considered. We build upon the MT Lasso with a de-biasing scheme to correct for the bias induced by the penalty. This scheme requires the introduction of a new data-driven object, coined the interaction matrix, that captures effective correlations between noise vector and residuals on different tasks. This matrix is psd, of size $T\times T$ and can be computed efficiently. The interaction matrix lets us derive asymptotic normal and $\chi^2_T$ results under Gaussian design and $\frac{sT+s\log(p/s)}{n}\to0$ which corresponds to consistency in Frobenius norm. These asymptotic distribution results yield valid confidence intervals for single entries of $B^*$ and valid confidence ellipsoids for single rows of $B^*$, for both known and unknown design covariance $\Sigma$. While previous proposals in grouped-variables regression require row-sparsity $s\lesssim\sqrt n$ up to constants depending on $T$ and logarithmic factors in $n,p$, the de-biasing scheme using the interaction matrix provides confidence intervals and $\chi^2_T$ confidence ellipsoids under the conditions ${\min(T^2,\log^8p)}/{n}\to 0$ and $$ \frac{sT+s\log(p/s)+\|\Sigma^{-1}e_j\|_0\log p}{n}\to0, \quad \frac{\min(s,\|\Sigma^{-1}e_j\|_0)}{\sqrt n} \sqrt{[T+\log(p/s)]\log p}\to 0, $$ allowing row-sparsity $s\ggg\sqrt n$ when $\|\Sigma^{-1}e_j\|_0 \sqrt T\lll \sqrt{n}$ up to logarithmic factors.

This paper studies M-estimators with gradient-Lipschitz loss function regularized with convex penalty in linear models with Gaussian design matrix and arbitrary noise distribution. A practical example is the robust M-estimator constructed with the Huber loss and the Elastic-Net penalty and the noise distribution has heavy-tails. Our main contributions are three-fold. (i) We provide general formulae for the derivatives of regularized M-estimators $\hat\beta(y,X)$ where differentiation is taken with respect to both $y$ and $X$; this reveals a simple differentiability structure shared by all convex regularized M-estimators. (ii) Using these derivatives, we characterize the distribution of the residual $r_i = y_i-x_i^\top\hat\beta$ in the intermediate high-dimensional regime where dimension and sample size are of the same order. (iii) Motivated by the distribution of the residuals, we propose a novel adaptive criterion to select tuning parameters of regularized M-estimators. The criterion approximates the out-of-sample error up to an additive constant independent of the estimator, so that minimizing the criterion provides a proxy for minimizing the out-of-sample error. The proposed adaptive criterion does not require the knowledge of the noise distribution or of the covariance of the design. Simulated data confirms the theoretical findings, regarding both the distribution of the residuals and the success of the criterion as a proxy of the out-of-sample error. Finally our results reveal new relationships between the derivatives of $\hat\beta(y,X)$ and the effective degrees of freedom of the M-estimator, which are of independent interest.

This paper develops asymptotic normality results for individual coordinates of robust M-estimators with convex penalty in high-dimensions, where the dimension $p$ is at most of the same order as the sample size $n$, i.e, $p/n\le\gamma$ for some fixed constant $\gamma>0$. The asymptotic normality requires a bias correction and holds for most coordinates of the M-estimator for a large class of loss functions including the Huber loss and its smoothed versions regularized with a strongly convex penalty. The asymptotic variance that characterizes the width of the resulting confidence intervals is estimated with data-driven quantities. This estimate of the variance adapts automatically to low ($p/n\to0)$ or high ($p/n \le \gamma$) dimensions and does not involve the proximal operators seen in previous works on asymptotic normality of M-estimators. For the Huber loss, the estimated variance has a simple expression involving an effective degrees-of-freedom as well as an effective sample size. The case of the Huber loss with Elastic-Net penalty is studied in details and a simulation study confirms the theoretical findings. The asymptotic normality results follow from Stein formulae for high-dimensional random vectors on the sphere developed in the paper which are of independent interest.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) systems are limited by their slow processing speed, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and expensive and challenging hardware setups. In this work, we demonstrate applying a denoising convolutional network to improve FLIM SNR. The network will be integrated with an instant FLIM system with fast data acquisition based on analog signal processing, high SNR using high-efficiency pulse-modulation, and cost-effective implementation utilizing off-the-shelf radio-frequency components. Our instant FLIM system simultaneously provides the intensity, lifetime, and phasor plots \textit{in vivo} and \textit{ex vivo}. By integrating image denoising using the trained deep learning model on the FLIM data, provide accurate FLIM phasor measurements are obtained. The enhanced phasor is then passed through the K-means clustering segmentation method, an unbiased and unsupervised machine learning technique to separate different fluorophores accurately. Our experimental \textit{in vivo} mouse kidney results indicate that introducing the deep learning image denoising model before the segmentation effectively removes the noise in the phasor compared to existing methods and provides clearer segments. Hence, the proposed deep learning-based workflow provides fast and accurate automatic segmentation of fluorescence images using instant FLIM. The denoising operation is effective for the segmentation if the FLIM measurements are noisy. The clustering can effectively enhance the detection of biological structures of interest in biomedical imaging applications., Comment: SPIE Proceedings Volume 11648, Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences XXI; 116481C (2021)

A generic out-of-sample error estimate is proposed for robust $M$-estimators regularized with a convex penalty in high-dimensional linear regression where $(X,y)$ is observed and $p,n$ are of the same order. If $\psi$ is the derivative of the robust data-fitting loss $\rho$, the estimate depends on the observed data only through the quantities $\hat\psi = \psi(y-X\hat\beta)$, $X^\top \hat\psi$ and the derivatives $(\partial/\partial y) \hat\psi$ and $(\partial/\partial y) X\hat\beta$ for fixed $X$. The out-of-sample error estimate enjoys a relative error of order $n^{-1/2}$ in a linear model with Gaussian covariates and independent noise, either non-asymptotically when $p/n\le \gamma$ or asymptotically in the high-dimensional asymptotic regime $p/n\to\gamma'\in(0,\infty)$. General differentiable loss functions $\rho$ are allowed provided that $\psi=\rho'$ is 1-Lipschitz. The validity of the out-of-sample error estimate holds either under a strong convexity assumption, or for the $\ell_1$-penalized Huber M-estimator if the number of corrupted observations and sparsity of the true $\beta$ are bounded from above by $s_*n$ for some small enough constant $s_*\in(0,1)$ independent of $n,p$. For the square loss and in the absence of corruption in the response, the results additionally yield $n^{-1/2}$-consistent estimates of the noise variance and of the generalization error. This generalizes, to arbitrary convex penalty, estimates that were previously known for the Lasso., Comment: This version adds simulations for the nuclear norm penalty

New upper bounds are developed for the $L_2$ distance between $\xi/\text{Var}[\xi]^{1/2}$ and linear and quadratic functions of $z\sim N(0,I_n)$ for random variables of the form $\xi=bz^\top f(z) - \text{div} f(z)$. The linear approximation yields a central limit theorem when the squared norm of $f(z)$ dominates the squared Frobenius norm of $\nabla f(z)$ in expectation. Applications of this normal approximation are given for the asymptotic normality of de-biased estimators in linear regression with correlated design and convex penalty in the regime $p/n \le \gamma$ for constant $\gamma\in(0,{\infty})$. For the estimation of linear functions $\langle a_0,\beta\rangle$ of the unknown coefficient vector $\beta$, this analysis leads to asymptotic normality of the de-biased estimate for most normalized directions $a_0$, where ``most'' is quantified in a precise sense. This asymptotic normality holds for any convex penalty if $\gamma<1$ and for any strongly convex penalty if $\gamma\ge 1$. In particular the penalty needs not be separable or permutation invariant. By allowing arbitrary regularizers, the results vastly broaden the scope of applicability of de-biasing methodologies to obtain confidence intervals in high-dimensions. In the absence of strong convexity for $p>n$, asymptotic normality of the de-biased estimate is obtained for the Lasso and the group Lasso under additional conditions. For general convex penalties, our analysis also provides prediction and estimation error bounds of independent interest., Comment: Manuscript title was updated; see former title at arXiv:912.11943v3

We consider first order expansions of convex penalized estimators in high-dimensional regression problems with random designs. Our setting includes linear regression and logistic regression as special cases. For a given penalty function $h$ and the corresponding penalized estimator $\hat\beta$, we construct a quantity $\eta$, the first order expansion of $\hat\beta$, such that the distance between $\hat\beta$ and $\eta$ is an order of magnitude smaller than the estimation error $\|\hat{\beta} - \beta^*\|$. In this sense, the first order expansion $\eta$ can be thought of as a generalization of influence functions from the mathematical statistics literature to regularized estimators in high-dimensions. Such first order expansion implies that the risk of $\hat{\beta}$ is asymptotically the same as the risk of $\eta$ which leads to a precise characterization of the MSE of $\hat\beta$; this characterization takes a particularly simple form for isotropic design. Such first order expansion also leads to inference results based on $\hat{\beta}$. We provide sufficient conditions for the existence of such first order expansion for three regularizers: the Lasso in its constrained form, the lasso in its penalized form, and the Group-Lasso. The results apply to general loss functions under some conditions and those conditions are satisfied for the squared loss in linear regression and for the logistic loss in the logistic model., Comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2019 and published at https://papers.nips.cc/paper/8606-first-order-expansion-of-convex-regularized-estimators . The version here includes the supplementary material

We consider the problem of selecting the best estimator among a family of Tikhonov regularized estimators, or, alternatively, to select a linear combination of these regularizers that is as good as the best regularizer in the family. Our theory reveals that if the Tikhonov regularizers share the same penalty matrix with different tuning parameters, a convex procedure based on $Q$-aggregation achieves the mean square error of the best estimator, up to a small error term no larger than $C\sigma^2$, where $\sigma^2$ is the noise level and $C>0$ is an absolute constant. Remarkably, the error term does not depend on the penalty matrix or the number of estimators as long as they share the same penalty matrix, i.e., it applies to any grid of tuning parameters, no matter how large the cardinality of the grid is. This reveals the surprising "cost-free" nature of optimally tuning Tikhonov regularizers, in striking contrast with the existing literature on aggregation of estimators where one typically has to pay a cost of $\sigma^2\log(M)$ where $M$ is the number of estimators in the family. The result holds, more generally, for any family of ordered linear smoothers. This encompasses Ridge regression as well as Principal Component Regression. The result is extended to the problem of tuning Tikhonov regularizers with different penalty matrices.

This paper studies schemes to de-bias the Lasso in a linear model $y=X\beta+\epsilon$ where the goal is to construct confidence intervals for $a_0^T\beta$ in a direction $a_0$, where $X$ has iid $N(0,\Sigma)$ rows. We show that previously analyzed propositions to de-bias the Lasso require a modification in order to enjoy efficiency in a full range of sparsity. This modification takes the form of a degrees-of-freedom adjustment that accounts for the dimension of the model selected by Lasso. Let $s_0$ be the true sparsity. If $\Sigma$ is known and the ideal score vector proportional to $X\Sigma^{-1}a_0$ is used, the unadjusted de-biasing schemes proposed previously enjoy efficiency if $s_0\lll n^{2/3}$. However, if $s_0\ggg n^{2/3}$, the unadjusted schemes cannot be efficient in certain $a_0$: then it is necessary to modify existing procedures by a degrees-of-freedom adjustment. This modification grants asymptotic efficiency for any $a_0$ when $s_0/p\to 0$ and $s_0\log(p/s_0)/n \to 0$. If $\Sigma$ is unknown, efficiency is granted for general $a_0$ when $$\frac{s_0\log p}{n}+\min\Big\{\frac{s_\Omega\log p}{n},\frac{\|\Sigma^{-1}a_0\|_1\sqrt{\log p}}{\|\Sigma^{-1/2}a_0\|_2 \sqrt n}\Big\}+\frac{\min(s_\Omega,s_0)\log p}{\sqrt n}\to0$$ where $s_\Omega=\|\Sigma^{-1}a_0\|_0$, provided that the de-biased estimate is modified with the degrees-of-freedom adjustment. The dependence in $s_0,s_\Omega$ and $\|\Sigma^{-1}a_0\|_1$ is optimal. Our estimated score vector provides a novel methodology to handle dense $a_0$. Our analysis shows that the degrees-of-freedom adjustment is not needed when the initial bias in direction $a_0$ is small, which is granted under stringent conditions on $\Sigma^{-1}$. The main proof argument is an interpolation path similar to that typically used to derive Slepian's lemma. It yields a new $\ell_\infty$ error bound for the Lasso which is of independent interest.