Search

Copyright of Revista Organizações em Contexto is the property of Revista Organizacoes em Contexto and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa is the property of Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas Sociais and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração is the property of Universidade Federal Fluminense (Revista Pensamento Contemporaneo em Administracao) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) is the property of Amazon, Organizations & Sustainability - AOS / Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais is the property of Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal Public Administration & Social Management / Administração Pública e Gestão Social is the property of Administracao Publica e Gestao Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We propose to analyze the consumption of social networks by Brazilian individuals after the start of the pandemic and their perception about the use of their data and attitude towards the terms of consent. Such terms outline the relationship between users and social networks. We developed a survey after the start of the pandemic, with the participation of 516 respondents. Based on the responses, we found that social networks' use increased after the beginning of the pandemic. Besides, almost 40% of respondents believe that the use of their data damages privacy and/or data is not used following current legislation. Even so, among that 40% of respondents, almost 75% never or rarely, read the terms of consent. Also, research shows that among respondents with a higher education level, there are those who least read such terms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The profile of the Student Affairs teams (SEPAE) was sought to know the transformations on the praxis in the pandemic of the Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR). The quantitative and qualitative method was carried out through an online questionnaire. Fifty-three response forms were received. The results indicated the profile was composed of an interdisciplinary background, female, aged between thirty-one and fifty years old and working for more than six years in the area. The analysis categories point to the distant proximity between the IFPR and the students, the insufficiency of the student assistance policy, and the subjective meaning of the policy as a financial contribution. The limits of the praxis were the new demands, the operators’ lack of knowledge, budget cuts and the ‘stipend’ conception of student assistance. As possibilities, the consolidation of SEPAE in the implementation of permanence as a link between the school and the students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]