1. Cost-effectiveness of a disease-specific oral nutritional support for pressure ulcer healing
- Author
-
Cereda, E., Klersy, C., Andreola, M., Pisati, R., Schols, J.M.G.A., Caccialanza, R., D'Andrea, F., OligoElement Sore Trial (OEST) Study Group, the, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: CAPHRI - R1 - Ageing and Long-Term Care, Family Medicine, Health Services Research, and RS: Academische Werkplaats Ouderenzorg
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,Pathology ,Cost effectiveness ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Administration, Oral ,ECONOMIC-EVALUATION ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Antioxidants ,law.invention ,030207 dermatology & venereal diseases ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Clinical endpoint ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Medical nutrition therapy ,Pressure ulcers ,health care economics and organizations ,Aged, 80 and over ,Pressure Ulcer ,Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL ,MALNUTRITION ,Zinc ,Female ,INTERVENTION ,RESIDENTS ,Disease specific ,Ulcer healing ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Endpoint Determination ,Healing ,Arginine ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,MANAGEMENT ,medicine ,Humans ,Intensive care medicine ,Aged ,Wound Healing ,030109 nutrition & dietetics ,business.industry ,Oral nutritional support ,ADULTS ,medicine.disease ,Malnutrition ,Long-term care ,Dietary Supplements ,Economic evaluation ,Cost-effectiveness ,LONG-TERM-CARE ,business - Abstract
Background & aims The Oligo Element Sore Trial has shown that supplementation with a disease-specific nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improves pressure ulcer (PU) healing in malnourished patients compared to an isocaloric–isonitrogenous support. However, the use of such a nutritional formula needs to be supported also by a cost-effectiveness evaluation. Methods This economic evaluation – from a local healthcare system perspective – was conducted alongside a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial following a piggy-back approach. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of change in PU area at 8 weeks. The cost analysis focused on: the difference in direct medical costs of local PU care between groups and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of nutritional therapy related to significant study endpoints (percentage of change in PU area and ≥40% reduction in PU area at 8 weeks). Results Although the experimental formula was more expensive (mean difference: 39.4 Euros; P < 0.001), its use resulted in money saving with respect to both non-nutritional PU care activities (difference, −113.7 Euros; P = 0.001) and costs of local PU care (difference, −74.3 Euros; P = 0.013). Therefore, given its efficacy it proved to be a cost-effective intervention. The robustness of these results was confirmed by the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion The use of a disease-specific oral nutritional formula not only results in better healing of PUs, but also reduces the costs of local PU care from a local healthcare system perspective
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF