Search

Strategies to identify tumors at highest risk for treatment failure are currently under investigation for patients with bladder cancer. We demonstrate that flow cytometric detection of poorly differentiated basal tumor cells (BTCs), as defined by the co-expression of CD90, CD44 and CD49f, directly from patients with early stage tumors (T1-T2 and N0) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) engraftment in locally advanced tumors (T3-T4 or N+) predict poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of bladder tumor cells isolated from PDXs indicates unique patterns of gene expression during bladder tumor cell differentiation. We found cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C) overexpression in poorly differentiated BTCs and determined that CDC25C expression predicts adverse survival independent of standard clinical and pathologic features in bladder cancer patients. Taken together, our findings support the utility of BTCs and bladder cancer PDX models in the discovery of novel molecular targets and predictive biomarkers for personalizing oncology care for patients.

Background: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Growing evidence suggests that radiation, specifically stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may enhance the immunogenic response as well as cytoreduce tumor burden. The primary objective of the study is to determine the progression free survival for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC treated with combination multisite SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab)., Methods: This is a multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study. Patients with treatment-naïve, ES-SCLC will be eligible for this study. Patients will receive durvalumab 1500mg IV q3w, carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL q3w, and etoposide 80 to 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 q3w for four cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500mg IV q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Ablative radiation will be delivered 1 to 4 extracranial sites in 3 or 5 fractions, determined by location, during cycle 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, measured from day 1 of chemoimmunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity by CTCAE v5.0 within three months of RT, overall survival, response rate, time to second line systemic therapy, and time to new distant progression., Conclusions: Now that immunotherapy is an established part of ES-SCLC management, it is important to further optimize its use and effect. This study will investigate the progression-free survival of combined SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. In addition, the data from this study may further inform the immunogenic role of SBRT with chemo-immunotherapy, as well as identify clinical, biological, or radiomic prognostic features., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the role of primary site SABR for locally recurrent or metastatic RCC is unclear. Here, we report outcomes of primary SABR across a diverse cohort of localized, recurrent, and metastatic RCC patients treated at our institution., Materials and Methods: RCC patients treated with SABR to lesions of the kidney or nephrectomy bed at our institution with at least 6 months of follow-up were included for analysis. Local control, overall survival, and freedom from distant failure were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was assessed at baseline and following SABR., Results: Fifty-three patients received primary site SABR. Thirty-seven (70 %) patients had localized RCC, and 16 (30 %) had metastatic RCC. Seven (13 %) had locally recurrent RCC after prior surgery or ablation. The median tumor size was 4.5 cm (IQR 3.7-6.3). At a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 12-35), 2-year local control was 100 %, and 3-year local control was 94.4 % (95 % CI 84.4 %-100 %). Among patients with initially localized disease, the 2-year freedom from distant failure was 94.6 % (95 % CI 87.6 %-100 %), and the 2-year overall survival was 66.5 % (95 % CI 51.9 %-85.2 %). Twelve (23 %) patients experienced acute grade 1-2 treatment-related toxicity (nausea, vomiting, or small bowel). There were no acute grade 3-4 toxicities. Two (3.8 %) patients developed late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The median baseline eGFR was 51 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR 38-77). At 1-year post-SABR, the median eGFR decline was 5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR -3 to 9). One patient required dialysis following SABR., Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates excellent local control rates across patients with localized, recurrent, and metastatic RCC treated with SABR. Treatment was associated with minimal eGFR decline., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Walter M. Stadler has acted as a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, and Treadwell Therapeutics, and a consultant for AstraZeneca, Aveo, Caremark/CVS, EMA Wellness, Fortress Biotech, and XenCor. Sean P. Pitroda is co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of PersonaDx (including equity) and reports intellectual property unrelated to the current manuscript., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Commentary: Sharing the burden of low-volume metastatic cancer between ICB and local treatments.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and effective for treatment of extracranial metastatic disease, but its safety when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has not yet been comprehensively reported. Here we report adverse events (AEs) associated with combined SBRT and ICI using prospectively-collected data on patients in three trials investigating multi-site SBRT combined with ICI., Methods: Patients were included from three prospective trials of ICI (pembrolizumab; nivolumab/urelumab or nivolumab/cabiralizumab; nivolumab/ipilimumab) with SBRT to 1-4 sites. AEs were recorded prospectively using the CTCAE v4.0. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method with a 90-day landmark. Association of patient characteristics with cumulative incidence of AEs was assessed using Fine-Gray regression., Results: 213 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10 months. Over the follow-up period, 50 % and 27 % of patients experienced at least one grade ≥ 2 or grade ≥ 3 AE, respectively. Cumulative incidences of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 AEs at 6 months were 47 % and 23 %, respectively. Three grade 5 AEs rated "possibly" related to treatment occurred outside the 90-day dose-limiting toxicity window. Landmarked survival analysis of patients with or without grade ≥ 3 AEs showed no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival. Dual-agent ICI was significantly associated with grade ≥ 3 AE., Conclusion: This analysis features the largest prospectively evaluated cohort of patients treated with combination ablative SBRT and ICI to date and provides context for future trial design. We conclude that multi-site SBRT and ICI can be safely co-administered when SBRT is delivered with prioritization of normal tissue constraints., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Connor Lynch: none to declare. Mark C. Korpics: none to declare. Rohan R. Katipally: none to declare. Christine M. Bestvina: Institutional funding from AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVS, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Jazz, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Tempus; participates in the Data Safety Monitoring and/or Advisory Board of AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVS, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Jazz, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Tempus. Sean P. Pitroda: Speaker’s Bureau for AACR and Immunorad conferences; co-founder of PersonaDx; co-inventor of patent related to metastatic disease and prognostication via University of Chicago IP office. Jyoti D. Patel: Consulting and Advisory Board for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Takeda Science Foundation, Genentech, Anheart Therapeutics; travel, accommodations, or expenses from Tempus. Jason J. Luke: DSMB: Abbvie, Agenus, Evaxion, Immutep, Shionogi; Scientific Advisory Board: (no stock) 7 Hills, Affivant, BioCytics, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio (stock) Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Elipscience, Kanaph, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, physIQ, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, Tempest; Consultancy with compensation: Abbvie, Agenus, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Askgene, Atomwise, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Cugene, Curadev, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, Ko Bio Labs, Krystal, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Inzen, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Instil, IO Biotech, LegoChem, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Pioneering Medicines, PsiOxus, Regeneron, Replimmune, Ribon, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Storm, Sumoitomo, Synlogic, Synthekine, Teva; Research Support: (all to institution) AbbVie, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Hot Spot, Ikena, Immatics, Imugene, Incyte, Janux, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Novartis, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, Tscan, Werewolf, Xencor; Patents: US-11638728 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof). Steven J. Chmura: Institutional funding from Bristol Myers Squibb; Family member employed by Astellas Pharmaceuticals. Aditya Juloori: Institutional funding from AstraZeneca; Consulting fees from Isoray, General Electric, and Aqualung., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have linked elevated tumor aneuploidy to anti-tumor immune suppression and adverse survival following immunotherapy. Herein, we provide supportive evidence for tumor aneuploidy as a biomarker of response to immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We identify a dose-response relationship between aneuploidy score and patient outcomes. In two independent NSCLC cohorts (n = 659 patients), we demonstrate a novel association between elevated aneuploidy and non-smoking-associated oncogenic driver mutations. Lastly, we report enrichment of TERT amplification and immune-suppressive phenotypes of highly aneuploid NSCLC. Taken together, our findings emphasize a potentially critical role for tumor aneuploidy in guiding immunotherapy treatment strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We previously reported that for men undergoing combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer, substitution of LHRH-agonists with 5-α- reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) led to improved preservation of 6-month hormonal quality of life (hQOL). With longer term follow-up, we evaluated disease control., Methods: In this non-randomized trial, men with unfavorable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer, aged ≥70 years or with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, were treated with RT (78-79.2 Gy in 39-44 fractions) and either oral ADT (oADT; 5-ARI with antiandrogen) or standard of care ADT (SOC; leuprolide with antiandrogen) for up to 28 months. The primary endpoint was EPIC hQOL; secondary endpoints included biochemical control and survival as well as changes in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels., Results: Between 2011 and 2018, 70 men were enrolled (40 in oADT; 30 in SOC). Median follow-up was 65 months [IQR 36-94]. Five-year freedom from biochemical failure for oADT and SOC was 89% versus 86%, disease free survival was 62% versus 69%, cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96%, and overall survival was 70% versus 81% (all P>.1). Testosterone (2 mo through 3 yr) and hemoglobin levels (2 mo through 2 yr) were higher, and cholesterol levels (1 yr) were lower in the oADT groups (all P < .05)., Conclusions: In this non-randomized study, men treated with combined RT and oADT had better preservation of hQOL and comparable 5-year disease outcomes to men treated with SOC. Eugonadal testosterone with this approach may yield measurable benefits in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels., Competing Interests: Disclosure Szmulewitz: Consulting fees: AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Exelixis, Merck, Novartis, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer and Eisai. Honoraria: Astellas Pharma, Pfizer/Astellas. Support for attending meetings/travel: Corcept Therapeutics. Patent licensed by University of Chicago of which I am co-inventor to Corcept Therapeutics for combination AR/GR inhibition in prostate cancer. Skolarus: Grants or Contracts: NCI R37 CA222885, NCI R01 CA242559. Participation in DSM Board or Advisory Board: NHBLI U01 HL159880., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy exerts immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects, both locally, within the irradiated tumour microenvironment, and systemically, outside the radiation field. Inspired by preclinical data that showed synergy between radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, multiple clinical trials were initiated with the hypothesis that combined treatment with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate a robust systemic immune response and improve clinical outcomes. However, despite early optimism, radioimmunotherapy trials in the curative and metastatic settings have met with little success. In this Review, we summarise the immunostimulatory effects of radiotherapy that provided the theoretical basis for trials of combination radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss findings from clinical trials incorporating radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors and examine the success of these trials in the context of the immunosuppressive effects of radiotherapy. We conclude by highlighting targets for relieving radiotherapy-induced immunosuppression with the goal of enhancing the combined effects of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SPP reports a patent pending for personalising treatment approaches for patients receiving immunotherapy and is a cofounder of PersonaDx. RRW reports stock and other ownership interests with Boost Therapeutics, Immvira, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Magi Therapeutics, and Oncosenescence; ownership interest in PersonaDx as a cofounder; consulting or advisory fees from Aettis, AstraZeneca, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Genus, Merck Serono, Nano proteagen, NKMax America, and Shuttle Pharmaceuticals; research grant funding from Varian and Regeneron; a patent pending for “Methods and kits for diagnosis and triage of patients with colorectal liver metastases”; a provisional patent for “Molecular subtyping of colorectal liver metastases to personalize treatment approaches”; and compensation for travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursement from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck Serono. CL declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The majority of cancer patients receive radiotherapy during the course of treatment, delivered with curative intent for local tumor control or as part of a multimodality regimen aimed at eliminating distant metastasis. A major focus of research has been DNA damage; however, in the past two decades, emphasis has shifted to the important role the immune system plays in radiotherapy-induced anti-tumor effects. Radiotherapy reprograms the tumor microenvironment, triggering DNA and RNA sensing cascades that activate innate immunity and ultimately enhance adaptive immunity. In opposition, radiotherapy also induces suppression of anti-tumor immunity, including recruitment of regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and suppressive macrophages. The balance of pro- and anti-tumor immunity is regulated in part by radiotherapy-induced chemokines and cytokines. Microbiota can also influence radiotherapy outcomes and is under clinical investigation. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis and CTLA-4 has been extensively investigated in combination with radiotherapy; we include a review of clinical trials involving inhibition of these immune checkpoints and radiotherapy., (© 2024 Wang et al.)

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is a widely employed anticancer treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that RT can elicit both tumor-inhibiting and tumor-promoting immune effects. The purpose of this study is to investigate immune suppressive factors of radiotherapy., Experimental Design: We used a heterologous two-tumor model in which adaptive concomitant immunity was eliminated., Results: Through analysis of PD-L1 expression and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) frequencies using patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells and murine two-tumor and metastasis models, we report that local irradiation can induce a systemic increase in MDSC, as well as PD-L1 expression on dendritic cells and myeloid cells, and thereby increase the potential for metastatic dissemination in distal, nonirradiated tissue. In a mouse model using two distinct tumors, we found that PD-L1 induction by ionizing radiation was dependent on elevated chemokine CXCL10 signaling. Inhibiting PD-L1 or MDSC can potentially abrogate RT-induced metastasis and improve clinical outcomes for patients receiving RT., Conclusions: Blockade of PD-L1/CXCL10 axis or MDSC infiltration during irradiation can enhance abscopal tumor control and reduce metastasis., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer are poor candidates for radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or mitomycin C. Given the benefit of chemotherapy in bladder-preserving therapy, less-intense concurrent chemotherapy regimens are needed. This study reports on efficacy and toxicity for patients treated with trimodality therapy using single-agent concurrent capecitabine., Materials and Methods: Patients deemed ineligible for radical cystectomy or standard chemoradiotherapy by a multidisciplinary tumor board and patients who refused cystectomy were included. Following TURBT, patients received twice-daily capecitabine (goal dose 825 mg/m 2 ) concurrent with radiotherapy to the bladder +/- pelvis depending on nodal staging and patient risk factors. Toxicity was evaluated prospectively in weekly on-treatment visits and follow-up visits by the treating physicians. Descriptive statistics are provided. Overall, progression-free, cancer-specific, distant metastasis-free, and bladder recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Twenty-seven consecutive patients met criteria for inclusion from 2013 to 2023. The median age was 79 with 9 patients staged cT3-4a and 7 staged cN1-3. The rate of complete response in the bladder and pelvis was 93%. Overall, progression-free, cancer-specific, distant metastasis-free, and bladder recurrence-free survival at 2 years were estimated as 81%, 65%, 91%, 75%, and 92%, respectively. There were 2 bladder recurrences, both noninvasive. There were 7 grade 3 acute hematologic or metabolic events but no other grade 3+ toxicities., Conclusion: Maximal TURBT followed by radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine offers a high rate of bladder control and low rates of acute and late toxicity., Competing Interests: Disclosure Walter M. Stadler: consultant for Astra-Zeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Treadwell Therapeutics, Caremark/CVS, EMA Wellness, Fortress Biotech; speaker's bureau for Dava Oncology, Global Academy for Medical Education, OncLive, PeerView, Research to Practice, Vindico; Grant/research support to the institution from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Astellas (Medivation), Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Calithera, Clovis, Corvus, Eisai, Exilixis, Genentech (Roche), Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, X4Pharmaceuticals, Xencor; stockholder in Fortress Biotech Peter H. O'Donnell: reports past research funding from the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium to perform pharmacogenomic studies related to capecitabine. The other authors does not have conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Emerging evidence suggests that local tumor radiotherapy reshapes the repertoire of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and leads to their infiltration into the tumor microenvironment, which poses a major obstacle for radiotherapy efficacy. Recent findings have identified RNA m 6 A modification at the nexus of both anti-tumor immunity and radiation response. Here, we examine the mechanisms by which this RNA modification modulates the immune milieu of the radiation-remodeled tumor microenvironment. We discuss potential therapeutic interventions targeting m 6 A machinery to improve radiotherapy response., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests R.R.W. and S.P.P. are co-inventors on a patent entitled “Methods and kits for diagnosis and triage of patients with colorectal liver metastases” (PCT/US2019/028071) and on a provisional patent entitled “Molecular subtyping of colorectal liver metastases to personalize treatment approaches.” R.R.W. has stock and other ownership interests with Boost Therapeutics, Immvira, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Magi Therapeutics, and Oncosenescence. He has served in a consulting or advisory role for Aettis, AstraZeneca, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Genus, Merck Serono S.A., Nano proteagen, NKMax America, and Shuttle Pharmaceuticals. He has received research grant funding from Varian and Regeneron. He has received compensation including travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursement from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck Serono S.A. C.H. has stock and other ownership interests with Accent Therapeutics, Inc. and Aferna Green, Inc. C.H. is scientific advisory board member of Aferna Green and Rona Therapeutics. R.R.W., C.H., H.L.L., and L.W. have a patent application pending (provisional application: ARCD.P0780US.P1/1001213214)., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Personalized treatment approaches for patients with oligometastatic colorectal liver metastases are critically needed. We previously defined 3 biologically distinct molecular subtypes of colorectal liver metastases: (1) canonical, (2) immune, and (3) stromal., Objective: To independently validate these molecular subtypes in the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective secondary analysis of the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial included a bi-institutional discovery cohort and multi-institutional validation cohort. The discovery cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for limited colorectal liver metastases (98% received perioperative chemotherapy) from May 31, 1994, to August 14, 2012. The validation cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases with perioperative chemotherapy (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based) with or without cetuximab from February 26, 2007, to November 1, 2012. Data were analyzed from January 18 to December 10, 2021., Interventions: Resected metastases underwent RNA sequencing and microRNA (miRNA) profiling in the discovery cohort and messenger RNA and miRNA profiling with microarray in the validation cohort., Main Outcomes and Measures: A 31-feature (24 messenger RNAs and 7 miRNAs) neural network classifier was trained to predict molecular subtypes in the discovery cohort and applied to the validation cohort. Integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were designated based on molecular subtypes and the clinical risk score. The unique biological phenotype of each molecular subtype was validated using gene set enrichment analyses and immune deconvolution. The primary clinical end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 240 patients were included (mean [range] age, 63.0 [56.3-68.0] years; 151 [63%] male), with 93 in the discovery cohort and 147 in the validation cohort. In the validation cohort, 73 (50%), 28 (19%), and 46 (31%) patients were classified as having canonical, immune, and stromal metastases, respectively. The biological phenotype of each subtype was concordant with the discovery cohort. The immune subtype (best prognosis) demonstrated 5-year PFS of 43% (95% CI, 25%-60%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.68) and OS of 63% (95% CI, 40%-79%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86), which was statistically significantly higher than the canonical subtype (worst prognosis) at 14% (95% CI, 7%-23%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%), respectively. Adding molecular subtypes to the clinical risk score improved prediction (the Gönen and Heller K for discrimination) from 0.55 (95% CI, 0.49-0.61) to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.57-0.67) for PFS and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) to 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.70) for OS. The low-risk integrated group demonstrated 5-year PFS of 44% (95% CI, 20%-66%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76) and OS of 78% (95% CI, 44%-93%; HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.84), superior to the high-risk group at 16% (95% CI, 10%-24%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-52%), respectively., Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, biologically derived colorectal liver metastasis molecular subtypes and integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were highly prognostic. This novel molecular classification warrants further study as a possible predictive biomarker for personalized systemic treatment for colorectal liver metastases., Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN22944367.

The "oligometastasis" hypothesis proposes that metastases exist as a spectrum and are not always disseminated. According to this theory, a subset of patients with metastatic disease could benefit from aggressive local therapies. However, the identification of patients most likely to exhibit an oligometastatic phenotype remains challenging. Recent literature focusing on basic and translational studies has identified novel epigenetic regulators of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the emergence of a spectrum of metastatic behavior. Herein, we review these scientific advances and suggest that the spectrum of metastatic virulence produced by these epigenetic mechanisms broadly contributes to the emergence of clinically evident "oligometastases." Epigenetic regulation of EMT programs can result in a spectrum of cell trajectories (e.g., quasi-mesenchymal and highly mesenchymal states) with differential propensity to develop metastases. We propose that quasi-mesenchymal cell states may be associated with a polymetastatic phenotype, whereas highly mesenchymal cell states may be associated with a more oligometastatic phenotype. The mechanisms governing epigenetic regulation of EMT and its array of intermediate states are multifaceted and may contribute to the development of the metastatic spectrum observed clinically. Within this context, translational studies that support the role of EMT and its epigenetic regulation are discussed. Continued translation of these mechanistic discoveries into novel biomarkers may help optimally select patients most likely to exhibit an oligometastatic phenotype and benefit from aggressive local therapies, such as surgery, radiotherapy, and other ablative procedures., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Numerous clinical studies are investigating the integration of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the management of advanced or metastatic solid cancers based on preclinical evidence demonstrating a synergistic interaction between these treatments. However, it remains unclear how to optimally integrate these therapeutic modalities in the treatment of cancer patients. Beyond disease-specific factors there exists numerous unanswered questions regarding optimal sequencing of radiation and ICI, as well as, radiation dosing and target selection. Here, we examine the available clinical evidence for combination radiation and ICI approaches and propose strategies to expand investigations of the potential synergy in cancer patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, survival remains poor with only a subset of patients deriving benefit. This trial investigated the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with immunotherapy in HCC., Methods and Materials: In this multicenter phase 1 randomized trial, patients with advanced or unresectable HCC received liver SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by either nivolumab alone or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity occurring within 6 months of SBRT. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), distant disease control, and local control of the irradiated tumor. Disease status and response endpoints were assessed radiographically every 8 weeks until progression or initiation of nonprotocol therapy. Response was determined using both RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 and iRECIST., Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled across 3 centers. Thirteen patients were evaluated for study endpoints. The study was closed early because of slow accrual. The median follow-up time was 42.7 months. Dose-limiting toxicities within 6 months occurred in 2 (15.4%) of 13 patients: 1 of 6 patients in the nivolumab arm (16.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-58.2%) and 1 of 7 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm (14.3%; 90% CI, 0.7%-52.1%). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 8 (61.6%), 5 (71.4%), and 3 (50.0%) patients in the overall nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab cohorts. Grade 3 hepatotoxicity occurred in 4 (30.8%), 3 (42.9%), and 1 (16.7%) patients in the respective cohorts. Clinical outcomes favored the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm compared with nivolumab alone, including an overall response rate of 57% (4 of 7 patients; 90% CI, 23%-87%) versus 0% (0 of 6 patients; 90% CI, 0%-39%), median progression-free survival of 11.6 months (90% CI, 4.5 months to not reached) versus 2.7 months (90% CI, 1.3-4.7 months), and median OS of 41.6 months (90% CI, 4.5 months to not reached) versus 4.7 months (90% CI, 2.0-16.2 months) (all P < .05). With combination immunotherapy, 3-year OS was 57% (90% CI, 23%-81%), with 2 patients alive after 42.7 months without progression and negative PET., Conclusions: In this first prospective trial investigating the combination of SBRT and immunotherapy for HCC, multimodal therapy demonstrated acceptable safety. SBRT with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared favorably to outcomes of immunotherapy alone and warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Molecular factors predicting relapse in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) are poorly understood, especially in inoperable patients receiving radiotherapy (RT). In this study, we compared the genomic profiles of inoperable and operable ES-NSCLC., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients with nonsquamous ES-NSCLC (stage I-II) treated at a single institution (University of Chicago) with surgery (ie, operable; n = 30) or RT (ie, inoperable; n = 23) who underwent tumor genomic profiling. A second cohort of ES-NSCLC treated with RT (Stanford, n = 39) was included to power clinical analyses. Prognostic gene alterations were identified and correlated with clinical variables. The primary clinical end point was the correlation of prognostic genes with the cumulative incidence of relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) in a pooled RT cohort from the two institutions (N = 62)., Results: Although the surgery cohort exhibited lower rates of relapse, the RT cohort was highly enriched for somatic STK11 mutations (43% v 6.7%). Receiving supplemental oxygen (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5), 20+ pack-years of tobacco smoking (OR = 6.1), and Black race (OR = 4.3) were associated with increased frequency of STK11 mutations. In the pooled RT cohort (N = 62), STK11 mutation was strongly associated with inferior oncologic outcomes: 2-year incidence of relapse was 62% versus 20% and 2-year OS was 52% versus 85%, remaining independently prognostic on multivariable analyses (relapse: subdistribution hazard ratio = 4.0, P = .0041; disease-free survival: hazard ratio, 6.8, P = .0002; OS: hazard ratio, 6.0, P = .022). STK11 mutations were predominantly associated with distant failure, rather than local., Conclusion: In this cohort of ES-NSCLC, STK11 inactivation was associated with poor oncologic outcomes after RT and demonstrated a novel association with clinical hypoxia, which may underlie its correlation with medical inoperability. Further validation in larger cohorts and investigation of effective adjuvant systemic therapies may be warranted.

Over 500 clinical trials are investigating combination radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) as cancer treatments; however, the majority of trials have found no positive interaction. Here we perform a comprehensive molecular analysis of a randomized phase I clinical trial of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent or sequential ablative radiotherapy and ICB. We show that concurrent treatment is superior to sequential treatment in augmenting local and distant tumor responses and in improving overall survival in a subset of patients with immunologically cold, highly aneuploid tumors, but not in those with less aneuploid tumors. In addition, radiotherapy alone decreases intratumoral cytotoxic T cell and adaptive immune signatures, whereas radiotherapy and ICB upregulates key immune pathways. Our findings challenge the prevailing paradigm that local ablative radiotherapy beneficially stimulates the immune response. We propose the use of tumor aneuploidy as a biomarker and therapeutic target in personalizing treatment approaches for patients with NSCLC treated with radiotherapy and ICB., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a promising biomarker of immunotherapy response across multiple cancer types; however, clinical outcomes among patients with low TMB tumors are heterogeneous. Herein, we demonstrate that tumor aneuploidy provides independent prognostic value among patients with lower TMB (<80th percentile) tumors treated with immunotherapy. A higher aneuploidy score is associated with poor prognosis following immunotherapy among tumors with low TMB, but not those with high TMB. Importantly, aneuploidy scores can be calculated from existing clinical targeted sequencing infrastructure, facilitating deployment of aneuploidy scores as a clinical biomarker., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Purpose: Thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with high rates of local control but carries a risk of pneumonitis. Immunotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with metastatic disease but can also cause pneumonitis. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracic SBRT with systemic immunotherapy, clinical outcomes of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and SBRT on prospective trials were reviewed., Methods and Materials: Three consecutive phase 1 trials of combination SBRT and ICB conducted between 2016 to 2020 for widely metastatic solid tumors were reviewed. The protocols mandated adherence to NRG BR001/BR002 organs at risk constraints, resulting in <100% coverage of some target volumes. ICB was administered either sequentially (within 7 days after completion of SBRT) or concurrently (before or at the start of SBRT), depending on protocol. End points included pneumonitis, dose-volume constraints, local failure, and overall survival. The cumulative incidence estimator and Kaplan-Meier method were used., Results: In the study, 123 patients met eligibility with 311 metastases irradiated. The most common histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (33%) and colorectal cancer (12%). Median follow-up was 12 months. The overall rate of grade 3+ pneumonitis was 8.1%; 1-year local failure was 3.6%. Established dosimetric parameters were significantly associated with the development of pneumonitis (P < .05). In most patients, the lungs were not challenged with high doses of radiation, defined as receiving ≥75% of the maximum for a given lung dose-volume constraint. Patients who were challenged were not found to have a significantly higher risk of pneumonitis., Conclusions: In the largest series of thoracic SBRT and immunotherapy, local control was excellent with acceptable toxicity and support the conclusion that established dose-volume constraints for the lung are safe. However, these results highlight the potential value in reporting of organs at risk being challenged with doses approaching protocol specified limits., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Personalized treatment approaches for patients with limited liver metastases from colorectal cancer are critically needed. By leveraging three large, independent cohorts of patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 336), we found that a proliferative subtype associated with elevated CIN70 scores is linked to immune exclusion, increased metastatic proclivity, and inferior overall survival in colorectal liver metastases; however, high CIN70 scores generate a therapeutic vulnerability to DNA-damaging therapies leading to improved treatment responses. We propose CIN70 as a candidate biomarker to personalize systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. These findings are potentially broadly applicable to other human cancers., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Metastases remain the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The oligometastasis hypothesis postulates that a spectrum of metastatic spread exists and that some patients with a limited burden of metastases can be cured with ablative therapy. Over the past decade, substantial advances in systemic therapies have resulted in considerable improvements in the outcomes of patients with metastatic cancers, warranting re-examination of the oligometastatic paradigm and the role of local ablative therapies within the context of the improved therapeutic responses, shifting patterns of disease recurrence and possible synergy with systemic treatments. Herein, we reframe the oligometastatic phenotype as a dynamic state for which locally ablative, metastasis-directed therapy improves clinical outcomes, including by prolonging survival and increasing cure rates. Important risk factors defining the metastatic spectrum are highlighted that inform both staging and therapy. Finally, we synthesize the literature on combining local therapies with modern systemic treatments, identifying general themes to optimally integrate ablative therapies in this context., (© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.)

The utility of radiotherapy as a means of palliating symptoms due to metastatic cancer is well-accepted. A growing body of literature suggests that radiotherapy may play a role beyond palliation in some patients with low-burden metastatic disease. Recent data suggest that oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy may improve progression-free and even overall survival in select patients. Immunotherapy also has a growing role in the management of patients with metastatic cancer and, like radiotherapy, appears to be most effective in the setting of low-volume disease. Thus, the addition of immunotherapy may be a feasible means of increasing the therapeutic ratio of metastasis-directed radiotherapy, particularly among patients with oligometastatic cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest R.R.W. has stock and other ownership interests with Boost Therapeutics, Immvira LLC, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals Inc., Magi Therapeutics, Oncosenescence. He has served in a consulting or advisory role for Aettis Inc., Astrazeneca, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Genus, Merck Serono S.A., Nano proteagen, NKMax America Inc, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals, Highlight Therapeutics, S.L. He has research grants with Varian and Regeneron. He has received compensation including travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursement from Astrazeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim LTD and Merck Serono S.A. R.R.W. and S.P.P. have a patent related to methods and kits for diagnosis and triage of patients with colorectal liver metastases (WO2019204576A1). W.T.T. has no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Somatic MEN1 mutations occur in up to 50% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Clinical studies have shown that radiation therapy (IR) is effective in a subset of PanNETs, but it remains unclear why some patients respond better to IR than others. Herein, we study whether MEN1 loss of function increases radiosensitivity of PanNETs and determine its effect on DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. After creating a MEN1 knockout PanNET cell line, we confirmed reduced DSB repair capacity in MEN1-deficient cells and linked these findings to a defect in homologous recombination, as well as reduced BRCA2 expression levels. Consistent with this model, we found that MEN1 mutant cells displayed increased sensitivity to the highly trapping poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 inhibitor talazoparib in vitro. Our results suggest that combining IR with PARP inhibition may be beneficial in patients with PanNETs and MEN1 loss of function.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves outcomes for some patients with advanced or metastatic cancers. Despite demonstrable progress, many patients do not respond to ICB. Recently, clinical trials have focused on combinations of ICB with radiation therapy. Although two recent Phase III randomized trials demonstrated improved survival with adjuvant ICB following chemoradiation, other Phase I/II/III trials are either negative or inconclusive, but do yield suggestive results and promising insights into future therapeutic strategies. We provide a selective review of a subset of these trials and attempt to integrate with basic laboratory findings where relevant to define issues pertaining to the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Previous studies have evaluated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic patients with NSCLC, including multimodality treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Questions remain regarding the timing of SBRT and immunotherapy, safety with dual checkpoint blockade, and the utility in widely metastatic patients. This randomized phase 1 trial combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with sequential or concurrent multisite SBRT in patients with stage IV NSCLC to evaluate safety and obtain preliminary activity data., Methods: Treatment-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to concurrent (SBRT with immunotherapy) or sequential (SBRT followed by immunotherapy) treatment. A maximum of four treatment fields received SBRT. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were continued until clinical progression, development of toxicity, or after 2 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity to the relevant organ system attributed to SBRT and immunotherapy occuring within 3 months., Results: A total of 37 patients were assessable. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the concurrent cohort (n = 18). The sequential cohort required a dose reduction in the central lung group owing to two grade 4 pneumonitis events (2 of 19). Overall best response was as follows: 5.4% (2 of 37) complete response, 40.5% (15 of 37) partial response, 16.2% (6 of 37) stable disease, and 37.8% (14 of 37) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-11.4 mo), with median follow-up of 17.0 months. Median overall survival was not reached., Conclusions: Concurrent nivolumab, ipilimumab, and SBRT were not more toxic than sequential therapy, and multisite SBRT was well tolerated in widely metastatic patients. Multimodality therapy resulted in durable metastasis control and encouraging early overall survival., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: CD137 agonism and CSF1R blockade augment stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and anti-programmed death-1 in preclinical models. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT with nivolumab+urelumab (CD137 agonist) or nivolumab+cabiralizumab (CSF1R inhibitor)., Patients and Methods: This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors that had progressed on standard therapies. SBRT was delivered to 1-4 metastases with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab given concurrently and following SBRT. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was the primary endpoint with anatomic location-specific SBRT doses deemed safe if ≤33% DLT frequency was observed. Secondary endpoints included RECISTv1.1 response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and molecular correlative studies., Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, and median follow-up for living patients is 13.8 months. Of these, 23 (38%) received SBRT+nivolumab+urelumab and 37 (62%) received SBRT+nivolumab+cabiralizumab. Seven patients (12%) experienced a DLT ( n = 3 grade 3, n = 4 grade 4) in the following anatomic cohorts: abdominal/pelvic (3/17, 18%), liver (1/13, 8%), central lung (2/14, 14%), and peripheral lung (1/12, 8%). Of 41 patients radiographically evaluable for best overall response including 55 radiated and 23 unirradiated RECIST target lesions, 2 had complete responses (5%), 7 had partial responses (17%), 12 had stable disease (29%), and 20 had progression (49%). Median estimated PFS and OS are 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9-4.8] and 17.0 months (95% CI, 6.8-undetermined), respectively. No patients with elevated pre-SBRT serum IL8 experienced a response., Conclusions: SBRT to ≤4 sites with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab for treating advanced solid tumors is feasible with acceptable toxicity and modest antitumor activity. See related commentary by Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., p. 5443 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) though most patients progress. There are limited data regarding molecular predictors of progression. In particular, there is controversy regarding the role of CDKN2A loss-of-function (LOF) in ICB resistance. We analyzed 139 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent NGS prior to ICB initiation to explore the association of CDKN2A LOF with clinical outcomes. 73% were PD-L1 positive (≥ 1%). 48% exhibited high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/megabase). CDKN2A LOF was present in 26% of patients and was associated with inferior PFS (multivariate hazard ratio [MVA-HR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.02-2.63, p = 0.041) and OS (MVA-HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.21-3.49, p = 0.0087) when compared to wild-type (WT) patients. These findings held in patients with high TMB (median OS, LOF vs. WT 10.5 vs. 22.3 months; p = 0.069) and PD-L1 ≥ 50% (median OS, LOF vs. WT 11.1 vs. 24.2 months; p = 0.020), as well as in an independent dataset. CDKN2A LOF vs. WT tumors were twice as likely to experience disease progression following ICB (46% vs. 21%; p = 0.021). CDKN2A LOF negatively impacts clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with ICB, even in high PD-L1 and high TMB tumors. This novel finding should be prospectively validated and presents a potential therapeutic target., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Radiotherapy and immunotherapy benefit subsets of patients with metastatic cancer. Here, we review selected laboratory and clinical studies investigating the utility of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy in metastatic patients. We examine potential approaches to increase the therapeutic ratio of radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic cancers moving forward., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Radiotherapy and immunotherapy are most effective as cancer therapies in the setting of low-volume disease. Although initial studies of radio-immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer have not confirmed the efficacy of this approach, the role of radio-immunotherapy in patients with limited metastatic burden is unclear. We propose that further investigation of radio-immunotherapy in metastatic patients should focus upon patients with oligometastatic disease.

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves outcomes in unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiation therapy (RT). It was hypothesized that replacing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists with a 5-α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) would improve hormonal health-related quality of life (HRQOL) without differentially suppressing androgen-responsive (AR) gene expression., Methods: Patients with localized unfavorable-risk PCa, aged ≥70 years or Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥2 were treated with oral ADT (oADT), consisting of 4 months of bicalutamide, a 5-ARI, and RT at 78 Gy. The primary end point was Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite HRQOL at 6 months ≤30%, and improvement compared with a synchronous standard of care (SOC) cohort receiving 4 months of bicalutamide and long-term LHRH agonist with RT. RNA sequencing was performed from matched pre-/post-ADT prostate tumor biopsies in a subset of men. Differential gene and pathway expressional changes were examined using gene set enrichment., Results: Between 2011 and 2018, 40 and 30 men were enrolled in the oADT and SOC cohorts, respectively. Median follow-up was 40 months. Those with ≤30% decline in hormonal HRQOL at 6 months was 97% (oADT) and 93% (SOC). The average 6-month hormonal decline was 1% (oADT) versus 12% (SOC; P = .04). The 4-year freedom from biochemical failure was 88% (oADT) versus 81% (SOC; P = .48). RNA sequencing (n = 9) showed similar numbers of downregulated and upregulated genes between the treatment groups (fold-change = 2; false-discovery rate-adjusted P ≤ .05). Both treatments comparably decreased the expression of 20 genes in canonical androgen receptor signaling., Conclusions: For men with PCa undergoing RT, oral versus standard ADT may improve 6-month QOL and appears to have a similar impact on androgen-responsive gene expression., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Cancer metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and most patients with metastases from solid tumors have historically been considered incurable. Here, we discuss the evolution of our understanding of the oligometastatic state with an emphasis on the view that cancer metastasis represents a spectrum of disease. We highlight several recently published prospective clinical trials demonstrating improvements in cancer-specific outcomes with the utilization of metastasis-directed local therapies. We discuss biological aspects of oligometastases, including genetic, epigenetic, and immune determinants of the metastatic spectrum. Finally, we propose future considerations regarding clinical trial design for patients with oligometastatic disease., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The antitumor effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are mediated in part through activation of innate and adaptive immunity. Here we report that gut microbiota influences tumor control following IR. Vancomycin decreased the abundance of butyrate-producing gut bacteria and enhanced antitumor responses to IR. Oral administration of Lachnospiraceae, a family of vancomycin-sensitive bacteria, was associated with increased systemic and intratumoral butyric acid levels and impaired the efficacy of IR in germ-free (GF) mice. Local butyrate inhibited STING-activated type I IFN expression in dendritic cells (DCs) through blockade of TBK1 and IRF3 phosphorylation, which abrogated IR-induced tumor-specific cytotoxic T cell immune responses without directly protecting tumor cells from radiation. Our findings demonstrate that the selective targeting of butyrate-producing microbiota may provide a novel therapeutic option to enhance tumor radiation sensitivity., Competing Interests: Disclosures:   R.R. Weichselbaum reported "other" from Boost Therapeutics, Immvira LLC, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Magi Therapeutics, Oncosenescence, Aettis Inc, AstraZeneca, Genus, Nano Proteagen, NK Max America Inc., Shuttle Pharmaceuticals, and Highlight Therapeutics S.L.; personal fees from Merck Serono SA; and grants from Varian and Regeneron outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported., (© 2021 Yang et al.)

Tumor-induced CD45 - Ter119 + CD71 + erythroid progenitor cells, termed "Ter cells," promote tumor progression by secreting artemin (ARTN), a neurotrophic peptide that activates REarranged during Transfection (RET) signaling. We demonstrate that both local tumor ionizing radiation (IR) and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment decreased tumor-induced Ter cell abundance in the mouse spleen and ARTN secretion outside the irradiation field in an interferon- and CD8 + T cell-dependent manner. Recombinant erythropoietin promoted resistance to radiotherapy or anti-PD-L1 therapies by restoring Ter cell numbers and serum ARTN concentration. Blockade of ARTN or potential ARTN signaling partners, or depletion of Ter cells augmented the antitumor effects of both IR and anti-PD-L1 therapies in mice. Analysis of samples from patients who received radioimmunotherapy demonstrated that IR-mediated reduction of Ter cells, ARTN, and GFRα3, an ARTN signaling partner, were each associated with tumor regression. Patients with melanoma who received immunotherapy exhibited favorable outcomes associated with decreased expression of GFRα3. These findings demonstrate an out-of-field, or "abscopal," effect mediated by adaptive immunity, which is induced during local tumor irradiation. This effect, in turn, governs the therapeutic effects of radiation and immunotherapy. Therefore, our results identify multiple targets to potentially improve outcomes after radiotherapy and immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)

Purpose: Multisite stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab (SBRT+P) has demonstrated safety in advanced solid tumors (ASTs). However, no studies have examined the relationships between irradiated tumor response, SBRT-induced tumor gene expression, and overall survival (OS)., Patients and Methods: Patients with AST received SBRT (30-50 Gy in 3-5 fractions) to two to four metastases followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks). SBRT was prescribed to a maximum tumor volume of 65 mL. Small metastases received the complete prescribed coverage (complete-Rx), while larger metastases received partial coverage (partial-Rx). Treated metastasis control (TMC) was defined as a lack of progression for an irradiated metastasis. Landmark analysis was used to assess the relationship between TMC and OS. Thirty-five biopsies were obtained from 24 patients: 19 pre-SBRT and 16 post-SBRT (11 matched) prior to pembrolizumab and were analyzed via RNA microarray., Results: Sixty-eight patients (139 metastases) were enrolled with a median follow-up of 10.4 months. One-year TMC was 89.5% with no difference between complete-Rx or partial-Rx. On multivariable analysis, TMC was independently associated with a reduced risk for death (HR, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.75; P = 0.006). SBRT increased expression of innate and adaptive immune genes and concomitantly decreased expression of cell cycle and DNA repair genes in the irradiated tumors. Elevated post-SBRT expression of DNASE1 correlated with increased expression of cytolytic T-cell genes and irradiated tumor response., Conclusions: In the context of SBRT+P, TMC independently correlates with OS. SBRT impacts intratumoral immune gene expression associated with TMC. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may improve the local response to radiation and the systemic response to immunotherapy. However, no prognostic markers exist to identify patients likely to benefit from combined therapy. The degree of T cell-mediated immunity, which can be quantified with radiomics using computed tomography (CT) imaging, is predictive of immunotherapy response. Herein we investigated whether a validated T cell radiomics score (RS) is correlated with clinical outcomes after multisite SBRT and pembrolizumab (SBRT + P)., Methods and Materials: The RS was quantified for 68 patients with metastatic treatment-refractory adult solid tumors who received SBRT (30-50 Gy, 3-5 fractions) and pembrolizumab ≤7 days after SBRT. RS was calculated using 8 variables, including 5 radiomics features extracted from pretreatment CT scans. At a prespecified cutoff of the 25th percentile, we assessed the association between RS and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. The prognostic effect of RS was assessed via logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards models. In an exploratory analysis, RS was also analyzed as a continuous variable., Results: One hundred thirty-nine tumors were analyzed. At the 25th percentile cutoff, high-RS patients were more likely to exhibit irradiated tumor responses to SBRT + P (odds ratio [OR] 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-59.17; P = .012). High-RS was associated with improved TMC compared with low-RS tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.74; P = .018). Furthermore, high-RS patients had improved PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P = .013) and OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.20-0.75; P = .005). As a continuous variable, higher RS was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI, 0.03-0.51; P = .004) but did not reach statistical significance for TMC (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.02-7.02; P = .502) or OS (HR 0.28, 95% CI, 0.05-1.55; P = .144)., Conclusions: We demonstrated the clinical validity of RS (at the 25th percentile cutoff) as a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with SBRT + P. Future validation of the prognostic value of RS in larger similarly treated patient cohorts is warranted., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Historical theories of metastasis have been informed by the seed and soil hypothesis, the Halsteadian paradigm proposing an orderly spread from local to distant sites, and the presumption that cancer is an inherently systemic process even in the earliest cases. The more contemporary spectrum theory now suggests that the propensity for distant spread exists along a continuum of metastatic virulence. Tumors with limited metastatic potential represent one subset along this spectrum that could potentially be cured with local ablative therapy. Integrating clinical and molecular features to biologically inform the classification of not only oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease but also the entire metastatic spectrum holds great promise to improve prognostication and inform clinical decision making. To this end, the inclusion of molecular correlative studies and biospecimen collection on prospective protocols is imperative.

The elimination of metastases remains one of the major challenges in the curative treatment of patients with cancer. Therefore, most patients with metastatic disease typically receive systemic agents, which prolong survival and alleviate symptoms but are rarely curative. The oligometastatic paradigm challenges the prevailing view of metastasis as a disseminated process and proposes the existence of a spectrum of biological virulence within metastatic lesions. In this Perspectives article, we present evidence supporting our hypothesis that integrated clinical and molecular classification of metastases along the spectrum of disease influences the staging and treatment of patients with cancer.

Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality and remains one of the prevailing challenges in cancer treatment. Most patients with metastatic disease are treated with systemic agents, which prolong survival and improve symptoms but are typically not curative. The oligometastatic hypothesis challenges the perspective that metastasis is an invariably disseminated process, and proposes a biological spectrum of metastatic virulence. Mounting evidence supports the idea that patients with numerically and spatially restricted sites of metastases, termed oligometastases, can achieve prolonged survival following metastasis-directed therapies, such as surgery or radiotherapy. Improvements in clinical and molecular staging of metastatic disease, as well as integration of effective systemic therapies with localised interventions, might achieve better outcomes for patients with diverse metastatic states. In this Series paper, we propose a rationale for the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy to advance the potential for effective treatment along the spectrum of disease, with emphasis on how immunotherapy can potentiate radiotherapy treatment in the oligometastatic setting., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)