Search

Thoracic bulky esophageal cancer shrinks during radiotherapy, changing the location and shape of the surrounding heart and lungs. The current study aimed to explore how replanning by volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) influences the target coverage and dose to organs at risk in locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer. We retrospectively collected CT simulation images of initial and boost radiotherapy plans for locally advanced unresectable thoracic esophageal cancer in 17 consecutive patients. First, we created boost plans of 20 Gy using 3DCRT and VMAT on the initially acquired CT images. Second, we replicated the process on CT images acquired after 20–40 Gy of radiotherapy. We then compared non-replanned boost radiotherapy plans with replanned boost plans. Replanned radiotherapy delivered more conformal doses to the target and reduced heart and lung doses. VMAT reduced more irradiated mean doses to the heart than 3DCRT in the case of replanning (1.7 and 1.1 Gy, p < 0.001). Replanning to accommodate tumor shrinkage during radiotherapy effectively lowers the irradiated doses to the heart and lungs in patients with locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer, especially those treated with VMAT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Thoracic bulky esophageal cancer shrinks during radiotherapy, changing the location and shape of the surrounding heart and lungs. The current study aimed to explore how replanning by volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) influences the target coverage and dose to organs at risk in locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer. We retrospectively collected CT simulation images of initial and boost radiotherapy plans for locally advanced unresectable thoracic esophageal cancer in 17 consecutive patients. First, we created boost plans of 20 Gy using 3DCRT and VMAT on the initially acquired CT images. Second, we replicated the process on CT images acquired after 20–40 Gy of radiotherapy. We then compared non-replanned boost radiotherapy plans with replanned boost plans. Replanned radiotherapy delivered more conformal doses to the target and reduced heart and lung doses. VMAT reduced more irradiated mean doses to the heart than 3DCRT in the case of replanning (1.7 and 1.1 Gy, p

Background and purpose: Despite recent advances of online image-guided high-precision patient positioning and adaptation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or cone-beam computed tomography (CT), standard radiation therapy pathway still involves a dedicated simulation scan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and planning quality of integrating a simulation-free treatment planning workflow for adaptive online MRI-guided radiation therapy on a 1.5 T MRI linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) in prostate cancer using diagnostic CT (dCT) scans. Materials and methods: For ten patients with prostate cancer previously treated at the MRI-Linac with adaptive radiation therapy (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions), simulation-free reference plans based on dCT were retrospectively created, and adaptive plans were simulated for the first treatment fraction. Reference and adapted plans derived from both standard and simulation-free workflows were compared with regard to institutional dose/volume criteria, followed by statistical assessment using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of α = 0.025. Results: Simulation-free reference and adapted plans consistently met dose/volume criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between both workflows, except median values for near-maximum dose (D2%) in the planning target volume: 44.2 Gy (standard) vs. 44.5 Gy (simulation-free) in reference plans (p = 0.01), and 44.5 Gy vs. 44.6 Gy in adapted plans (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of simulation-free radiation therapy planning using dCT. Comparable treatment plan quality was observed for both reference and adapted radiation therapy plans in a curative setting for patients with prostate cancer.

Feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for partial breast irradiation (PBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to tumour bed was investigated. Four plans were created for 10 patients: 30 Gy/5 fractions, 26 Gy/5 fractions with 30 Gy SIB, 40.05 Gy/15 fractions, and 40.05 Gy/15 fractions with 48 Gy SIB. SIB in the 5 fraction arm had reduced ipsilateral breast dose relative to uniform dose. SIB in the 15 fraction arm had noninferior conformity compared to uniform dose. Addition of SIB did not increase other organ-at-risk doses or plan complexity. VMAT PBI with SIB was feasible for both fractionation regimens.

Simple Summary: Patients with breast or prostate cancer often develop painful tumors of the spine, i.e., spinal metastases. Treatment of these can be challenging as it is crucial to target the cancer cells without harming nearby healthy tissues. In this dose planning study, we compared three types of radiation therapy (RT) to see which could be most effective for treating spinal metastases while minimizing harm to nearby organs, such as the spinal cord, esophagus, heart, and lungs. Our results suggest that two advanced techniques, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), may be more precise in targeting the tumors and reducing potential harm to other organs compared to traditional palliative RT. These findings indicate that VMAT and PBT may offer better outcomes for certain groups of patients, but more research is needed to understand when these techniques could be appropriate. The aim of this planning study was to compare the dosimetric outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), and conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy (cEBRT) in the treatment of thoracic spinal metastases originating from breast or prostate cancer. Our study utilized data from 30 different treatment plans and evaluated target coverage and doses to vital organs at risk (OARs), such as the spinal cord, heart, esophagus, and lungs. The results showed that VMAT and PBT achieved superior target coverage and significantly lower doses to the spinal cord compared to cEBRT (target: median PTVD95%: 75.2 for cEBRT vs. 92.9 and 91.7 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p < 0.001), respectively; spinal cord: median Dmax%: 105.1 for cEBRT vs. 100.4 and 103.6 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p = 0.002), respectively). Specifically, VMAT was notable for its superior target coverage and PBT for significantly lower doses to heart, lungs, and esophagus. However, VMAT resulted in higher lung doses, indicating potential trade-offs among different techniques. The study demonstrated the relative advantages of VMAT and PBT over traditional RT in the palliative treatment of spinal metastases using conventional fractionation. These findings underscore the potential of VMAT and PBT to improve dosimetric outcomes, suggesting that they may be more suitable for certain patient groups for whom the sparing of specific OARs is especially important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of using flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams and the aperture shape controller (ASC) on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans. Methods and materials: A total of 24 head and neck (H&N) and 24 prostate with pelvic nodes treatment plans were used in this study. Each plan was reoptimized using the original clinical objectives with both flattened and FFF beams, as well as six different ASC settings. The dosimetric qualities of each plan cohort were evaluated using commonly used dose‐volume histogram values, and plan complexities were assessed through metrics including monitor unit (MU)/Dose, change in gantry speed, multileaf collimator (MLC) speed, the edge area ratio metric (EM), and the equivalent square length. Results: No significant differences in dosimetric qualities were found between plans with flattened and FFF beams. The ASC settings did not have significant effects on dosimetric qualities in the H&N plan cohort, but the "very high" ASC setting resulted in poorer dosimetric results for the prostate plans. Plans with FFF beams had significantly higher MU/Dose compared to plans with flattened beams. The use of flattening filter (FF) had significant effects on the change in gantry speed, with flattened beams producing plans that required higher change in gantry speed. However, the FF did not have significant effects on MLC speed, EM, or equivalent square length. In contrast, ASC settings had significant effects on these three metrics; increasing the ASC level resulted in plans with decreasing MLC speed, lower edge area ratio, and higher equivalent square length. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that using FFF beams with various ASC settings, except for the "very high" level, can produce plans with reduced complexities without compromising dosimetric qualities in conventional large‐field treatment plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mixed electron‐photon beam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an emerging technique in which external electron and photon beams are simultaneously optimized into a single treatment plan. MBRT exploits the steep dose falloff and high surface dose of electrons while maintaining target conformity by leveraging the sharp penumbra of photons. Purpose: This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of MBRT for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort of 22 STS of the lower extremity treated with conventional photon‐based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) were replanned with MBRT. Both VMAT and MBRT treatments were planned on the Varian TrueBeam linac using the Millenium multi‐leaf collimator. No electron applicator, cutout or additional collimating devices were used for electron beams of MBRT plans. MBRT plans were optimized to use a combination of 6 MV photons and five electron energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) by a robust column generation algorithm. Electron beams in this study were planned at standard 100 cm source‐axis distance (SAD). The dose to the clinical target volume (CTV), bone, normal tissue strip and other organs‐at‐risk (OARs) were compared using a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results: As part of the original VMAT treatment, tissue‐equivalent bolus was required in 10 of the 22 patients. MBRT plans did not require bolus by virtue of the higher electron entrance dose. CTV coverage by the prescription dose was found to be clinically equivalent between plans of either modality: V50Gy$V_{\text{50Gy}}$(MBRT) = 97.9 ± 0.2% versus V50Gy$V_{\text{50Gy}}$(VMAT) = 98.1 ± 0.6% (p=0.34). Evaluating the absolute paired difference between doses to OARs in MBRT and VMAT plans, we observed lower V20Gy$V_{\text{20Gy}}$ to normal tissue in MBRT plans by 14.9 ± 3.2% (p<10−6$p<10^{-6}$). Similarly, V50Gy$V_{\text{50Gy}}$ to bone was found to be decreased by 8.2 ± 4.0% (p<10−3$p<10^{-3}$) of the bone volume. Conclusion: For STS with subcutaneous involvement, MBRT offers statistically significant sparing of OARs without sacrificing target coverage when compared to VMAT. MBRT plans are deliverable on conventional linacs without the use of electron applicators, shortened source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) or bolus. This study shows that MBRT is a logistically feasible technique with clear dosimetric benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate the possible advantages of a simple spinal cord (SC) dose‐limiting three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT) technique in comparison to conventional two‐dimensional (2D) techniques and other 3D‐CRT techniques for spinal bone irradiation. Methods: For 41 spinal target volumes, seven different techniques were evaluated, using a standard schedule of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The SC dose‐limiting 3D‐CRT technique 1F2S‐18MV using a single posterior field (F) supplemented by two anterior segment fields (S) and 18‐MV photon beams was compared to two conventional 2D techniques (a single posterior field, PA, and two opposed anterior‐posterior fields, APPA), three other 3D‐CRT techniques (a single posterior field supplemented by four segment fields, 1F4S; two wedged fields, WD, and the SC dose‐limiting variant using 6 MV, 1F2S‐6MV) along with the original clinically applied plans. Results: 1F2S‐18MV demonstrated notably better results for all target volume parameters compared to the conventional 2D techniques (p < 0.001). Limitation of the SC dose was significantly superior with 1F2S‐18MV in comparison to PA and APPA (SC Dmean: 28.9 ± 0.4 vs. 30.1 ± 0.6 Gy and 30.1 ± 0.4 Gy; SC Dmax: 30.9 ± 0.7 vs. 32.5 ± 1.0 Gy and 31.8 ± 0.7 Gy; SC D1cm3: 30.1 ± 0.6 vs. 31.7 ± 0.9 Gy and 31.1 ± 0.6 Gy; p < 0.001). Likewise, lower mean SC doses with 1F2S‐18MV were observed in comparison to the more treatment time‐consuming 3D‐CRT techniques (1F4S, WD) and the original plans without relevant compromises on the dose homogeneity in the target volume and the dose exposure to the other OARs. Conclusion: In treatment planning of spinal metastases, simple variants of 3D‐CRT‐techniques like 1F2S‐18MV can offer a significant dose limitation to the SC while providing a sufficient dose coverage of the target volume. Especially in patients with favorable life expectancy and potential need for re‐irradiation, such SC dose‐limiting 3D‐CRT techniques may be a reasonable approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High penetration of intermittent generation increases uncertainty and variability in balancing reserve needs. New tools are needed to help the balancing authority system operator plan for intraday and intra-hour balance between generation and load. The Grid Reserve and Flexibility Planning tool (GRAF-Plan) helps plan for adequate balancing reserves for future years or seasons for expected wind and solar generation. It also assesses the flexibility of the scheduled generation fleet to meet such requirements. The estimations are based on utilities’ operational practices (e.g., forecasting and time frame of reserve deployment), and it incorporates detailed data from renewable generation and load. Application of the tool in estimating reserve requirements in Central America under different levels of renewable generation (high and low) and for the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) 2030 Anchor Data Set scenario is discussed.

Feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for partial breast irradiation (PBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to tumour bed was investigated. Four plans were created for 10 patients: 30 Gy/5 fractions, 26 Gy/5 fractions with 30 Gy SIB, 40.05 Gy/15 fractions, and 40.05 Gy/15 fractions with 48 Gy SIB. SIB in the 5 fraction arm had reduced ipsilateral breast dose relative to uniform dose. SIB in the 15 fraction arm had noninferior conformity compared to uniform dose. Addition of SIB did not increase other organ-at-risk doses or plan complexity. VMAT PBI with SIB was feasible for both fractionation regimens., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology.)

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of dynamic wave arc (DWA) and coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (co-VMAT) plans for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The planning target volume (PTV)-rectum, a section of the PTV comprising the PTV minus that of the rectum, received 78 Gy in 39 fractions as the mean dose to the PTV-rectum. The DWA and co-VMAT plans were generated for each patient using the RayStation treatment planning system for the Vero4DRT system. The PTV-rectum dose (D 95% : the percent dose irradiating 95% of the volume), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), as well as doses to the bladder wall, rectum wall (V 10–70 Gy: the percent volume receiving 10–70 Gy), and bilateral femoral heads of the DWA and co-VMAT plans were compared. The output monitor unit (MU) and delivery time obtained for each set of plans were also investigated. In terms of target coverage, the DWA plans provided an average D 95% of 75.5 Gy, which was comparable to the co-VMAT-plan D 95% of 75.2 Gy (p < 0.05). The HI was significantly better with the DWA. As for the DWA plans, the bladder-wall volume receiving 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy (V 10–40 Gy) was significantly smaller than that of the co-VMAT plans, and the volume of the rectal wall receiving 10 Gy (V 10Gy) was significantly larger than that of the co-VMAT plans. The DWA plans yielded a reduced dose to the bilateral femoral heads compared with the co-VMAT plans (p < 0.05). The values of the CI and MU, and the delivery time exhibited no significant differences between the DWA and co-VMAT plans. The DWA plan is a feasible treatment option for prostate cancer radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this work is a comparison study of the plan quality betwe en two techniques of a common Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) was performed to optimize the dose for low risk prostate cancer. Materials and methods: Based on CT datasets of ten patients with prostate cancer treated at our institution were randomly selected for this study. To optimize the IMRT technique, Two IMRTs configurations, differing for gantry angle direction, were tested for each patient. The first technique (IMRT-S) was used as reference plan utilized a five beams configuration, standard for prostate cancer treatment in our institution, and the second technique (IMRT-OP) combining five plans with five beams for each (25 beams in total), changing beam directions every 7 sessions level (70Gy in 35 fractions) to be irradiated. Plan quality was evaluated by comparing Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), monitor units (MUs) especially dose volume statistics of the Organs at Risk (OAR) from each technique. Results: For the same Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage, the IMRT-OP plans show superior dose homogeneity and conformity in PTV compared to IMRT-S technique. Target coverage was almost similar for both techniques. The sparing of Rectum in terms of 70Gy dose was better in the IMRT-OP technique by 4.9% when compared to the IMRT-S technique. A considerable reduction in 65Gy dose to the Bladder by 3.4% was observed with the IMRT-OP. At the end Remarkable reduction of the dose received at the femoral heads between 36.31% and 53.30% always in favour of the IMRT-OP technique. Conclusion: Considering the superior quality of the IMRT-OP plan compared to IMRT-S, IMRT-OP may be the preferred modality for centres that don't have VMAT technique for the treatment of prostate cancer, taking into account significant improvements in OARs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare carbon-ion (C-ion), proton and photon radiotherapy (RT) plans with regard to dose reduction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a greater omentum spacer (GO spacer). Methods We retrospectively retrieved data for ten patients who received the GO spacer as surgical spacer placement for abdominal and pelvic tumors. Simulation plans were created on pre-spacer Computed Tomography (CT) and post-spacer CT for C-ion RT, proton RT and photon RT to compare the dose of the GI tract. The plans were normalized so that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness equivalent) delivered in 35 fractions. All plans were created with the lowest possible dose to the GI tract under conditions that meet the dose constraints for the PTV and spinal cord (maximum dose

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (MRI-based-IMRT) with the MRIdian Linac system to that of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with the TrueBeam STx system for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods A total of 22 patients with tumors located in the lower lobe were retrospectively selected for the study. For each patient, both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and identical structures with the exception of the planning target volume (PTV). The PTVs of the MRI-based-IMRT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 3 mm from the gross tumor volume, whereas those of VMAT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 5 mm from the internal target volume. For both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT, the prescription doses to the PTVs were 60 Gy in four fractions. Results The average PTV volume of the MRI-based-IMRT was approximately 4-times smaller than that of VMAT (p

Abstract Background Although there have been many attempts to increase the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma), only a few planning studies have reported the efficacy of the modern radiotherapy technique till date. Therefore, we performed the dosimetric comparison among 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans, using deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) or free-breathing (FB) techniques, to determine the most optimal plan for gastric MALToma. Methods We evaluated 9 patients with gastric MALToma for whom 3D-CRT, step-and-shoot IMRT (SIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and tomotherapy plans with identical prescribed doses were generated using DIBH or FB computed tomography (CT). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage and non-target doses were calculated for each plan and compared with plan quality metric (PQM) scores. Results All 72 plans of 9 patients satisfied our dosimetric goals, and the IMRT plans and 3D-CRT plans had similarly good conformity index values with no differences related to respiratory movement. IMRT plans yielded significantly better doses to the organs-at-risk, and DIBH plans yielded significantly lower liver, heart, and lung Dmean and spinal cord Dmax with smaller irradiated volumes compared to FB plans. For the mean PQM scores, VMAT-DIBH and SIMRT-DIBH yielded the best scores, whereas 3D plans provided reduced beam monitor unit values. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that modern RT technologies (DIBH with VMAT or SIMRT) could potentially provide excellent target coverage for gastric MALToma while reducing doses to organs-at-risk. However, the relevance of the most optimal plan considering clinical outcomes should be confirmed further in a larger patient cohort.

Abstract Background Automated treatment planning and/or optimization systems (ATPS) are in the process of broad clinical implementation aiming at reducing inter-planner variability, reducing the planning time allocated for the optimization process and improving plan quality. Five different ATPS used clinically were evaluated for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods Three radiation oncology departments compared 5 different ATPS: 1) Automatic Interactive Optimizer (AIO) in combination with RapidArc (in-house developed and Varian Medical Systems); 2) Auto-Planning (AP) (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems); 3) RapidPlan version 13.6 (RP1) with HNC model from University Hospital A (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA); 4) RapidPlan version 13.7 (RP2) combined with scripting for automated setup of fields with HNC model from University Hospital B; 5) Raystation multicriteria optimization algorithm version 5 (RS) (Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Eight randomly selected HNC cases from institution A and 8 from institution B were used. PTV coverage, mean and maximum dose to the organs at risk and effective planning time were compared. Ranking was done based on 3 Gy increments for the parallel organs. Results All planning systems achieved the hard dose constraints for the PTVs and serial organs for all patients. Overall, AP achieved the best ranking for the parallel organs followed by RS, AIO, RP2 and RP1. The oral cavity mean dose was the lowest for RS (31.3 ± 17.6 Gy), followed by AP (33.8 ± 17.8 Gy), RP1 (34.1 ± 16.7 Gy), AIO (36.1 ± 16.8 Gy) and RP2 (36.3 ± 16.2 Gy). The submandibular glands mean dose was 33.6 ± 10.8 Gy (AP), 35.2 ± 8.4 Gy (AIO), 35.5 ± 9.3 Gy (RP2), 36.9 ± 7.6 Gy (RS) and 38.2 ± 7.0 Gy (RP1). The average effective planning working time was substantially different between the five ATPS (in minutes):

For stereotactic irradiation, both, penumbra and MLC leaf width make an impact on the sparing of healthy tissue around the target. Mostly, MLC design is regarded as the one influenceable parameter. However, also penumbra can be varied by choosing different distances between the source of radiation and the patient. The authors investigate the distance- dependent penumbra effects of idealized collimators as well as for real 5 mm MLCs. Test objects are small spherical targets of varying diameters to be irradiated under differing prescription conditions. A method to calculate exact stereotactic radial dose distributions from beam profiles or 2D dose distributions of single beams is developed for circular and MLC shaped targets. Also, a planning study is performed using a Pinnacle3™ planning system. Also, in a theoretical analysis perfect top hat profile beams and beams with varying penumbra are compared for better understanding of penumbra effects with respect to radial dose distributions. It is shown, that the penumbra changes for small targets are more relevant than the beam shaping by 5 mm MLCs. Quasi-isotropic irradiated MLC shaped (quadratic) beams at virtual SAD 700 mm produce steeper radial dose decrease than ideal circular beam shapes with a penumbra typical for SAD 1000 mm. A reduced source-to-patient distance allows better sparing of healthy tissue because of two reasons: The smaller effective leaf width but even more due to steeper penumbra. First, the authors suggest for future recommendations on stereotactic irradiations to specify not only MLC widths but also penumbra characteristics. Second, a so-called “virtual isocentre” could be useful to take advantage of the penumbra effect: Dependent on gantry angle and isocentric couch angle, the couch should be steered automatically in a way that the central axes of all beams always intersect in the same point at the same distance from the source.

Abstract Purpose Investigation of a reduced source to target distance to improve organ at risk sparing during stereotactic irradiation (STX). Methods The authors present a planning study with perfectly target-volume adapted collimator compared with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) at reduced source to virtual isocentre distance (SVID) in contrast to normal source to isocentre distance (SID) for stereotactic applications. The role of MLC leaf width and 20–80% penumbra was examined concerning the healthy tissue sparing. Several prescription schemes and target diameters are considered. Results Paddick’s gradient index (GI) as well as comparison of the mean doses to spherical shells at several distances to the target is evaluated. Both emphasize the same results: the healthy tissue sparing in the high dose area around the planning target volume (PTV) is improved at reduced SVID ≤ 70 cm. The effect can be attributed more to steeper penumbra than to finer leaf resolution. Comparing circular collimators at different SVID just as MLC-shaped collimators, always the GI was reduced. Even MLC-shaped collimator at SVID 70 cm had better healthy tissue sparing than an optimal shaped circular collimator at SID 100 cm. Regarding penumbra changes due to varying SVID, the results of the planning study are underlined by film dosimetry measurements with Agility™ MLC. Conclusion Penumbra requires more attention in comparing studies, especially studies using different planning systems. Reduced SVID probably allows usage of conventional MLC for STX-like irradiations.

Hypopharyngeal invasion would be a key finding in determining the extent of the irradiation fields in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) omitting upper cervical lymph nodal irradiation in CESCC without hypopharyngeal invasion, and the dosimetric superiority of SIB-IMRT to 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). We retrospectively identified 21 CESCC patients without hypopharyngeal invasion [clinical Stage I/II/III/IV (M1LYM); 3/6/5/7] (UICC-TNM 7th edition) who underwent chemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT between 2009 and 2015. SIB-IMRT delivered 60 Gy to each primary tumor and the metastatic lymph nodes, and 48 Gy to elective lymph nodal regions, including Levels III and IV of the neck, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal lymphatic regions, in 30 fractions. The overall survival rate, locoregional control rate, and initial recurrence site were evaluated. 3DCRT plans were created to perform dosimetric comparisons with SIB-IMRT. At a median follow-up of 64.5 months, the 5-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 66.7% and 53.4%, respectively. Disease progressed in eight patients: all were locoregional progressions and no patients developed distant progression including upper cervical lymph nodal regions as initial recurrence sites. The planning study showed SIB-IMRT improved target coverage without compromising the dose to the organs at risk, compared with 3DCRT. In conclusion, omitting the elective nodal irradiation of the upper cervical lymph nodes was probably reasonable for CESCC patients without hypopharyngeal invasion. Locoregional progression remained the major progression site in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)‐SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10‐mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t‐test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV‐to‐organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility. Results: Significant dose increases were observed in GI‐OARs in SIB‐SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI‐OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI‐OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations. Conclusions: SIB‐SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To identify dosimetric advantages of the novel Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), compared with non-coplanar three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (nc3D-CRT) and coplanar tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (tVMAT) with dual arcs of 45–65°. Methods Vero4DRT enables DWA by continuous gantry rotation and O-ring skewing with movement of the multi-leaf collimator. We compared the dose distributions of DWA, nc3D-CRT and tVMAT in 24 consecutive left-sided breast cancer patients treated with APBI (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions). The average doses and volumes to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk, especially heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) were compared among DWA, nc3D-CRT and tVMAT. Results The doses and volumes to the PTVs did not differ significantly among the three plans. For the DWA plans, the mean dose to the heart was 0.2 ± 0.1 Gy, less than those of the nc3D-CRT and tVMAT plans. The D 2% values of the planning organ at risk volume of the LAD were 9.3 ± 10.9%, 28.2 ± 31.9% and 20.3 ± 25.7% for DWA, nc3D-CRT and tVMAT, respectively. The V 20Gy and V 10Gy of the ipsilateral lung for the DWA plans were also significantly lower. Conclusions DWA allowed to find a better compromise for OAR which overlapped with the PTV. Use of the DWA for APBI improved the dose distributions compared with those of nc3D-CRT and tVMAT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To investigate the changes in quality of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with couch-shift between arcs by half of a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf width. Methods A total of 22 patients with head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively selected. Since the smallest MLC leaf width was 5 mm in this study, the couch was shifted by 2.5 mm in the longitudinal-direction between arcs to increase the resolution of fluence map. A total of three types of VMAT plans were generated for each patient; the three types of plans were a two-full-arc plan without couch-shift ( NS plan ), a two-half-arc-pair plan with couch-shift ( HAS plan ), and a two-full-arc pair plan with couch-shift ( FAS plan ). Changes in the dose-volumetric parameters were investigated. Results The FAS plan showed the best plan quality for the target volumes and organs at risk compared to the NS and HAS plans . However, the magnitudes of differences among the three types of plans were minimal, and every plan was clinically acceptable. The average integral doses of the NS , HAS , and FAS plans were 160,549 ± 37,600 Gy-cc, 147,828 ± 33,343 Gy-cc, and 156,030 ± 36,263 Gy-cc, respectively. The average monitor unit of the NS , HAS , and FAS plans were 717 ± 120 MU, 648 ± 100 MU, and 763 ± 158 MU, respectively. Conclusions The HAS plan was better than the others in terms of normal tissue sparing and plan efficiency. By shifting the couch by half of the MLC leaf width in the longitudinal direction between arcs, the VMAT plan quality could be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Investigation of a reduced source to target distance to improve organ at risk sparing during stereotactic irradiation (STX).Methods: The authors present a planning study with perfectly target-volume adapted collimator compared with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) at reduced source to virtual isocentre distance (SVID) in contrast to normal source to isocentre distance (SID) for stereotactic applications. The role of MLC leaf width and 20-80% penumbra was examined concerning the healthy tissue sparing. Several prescription schemes and target diameters are considered.Results: Paddick's gradient index (GI) as well as comparison of the mean doses to spherical shells at several distances to the target is evaluated. Both emphasize the same results: the healthy tissue sparing in the high dose area around the planning target volume (PTV) is improved at reduced SVID ≤ 70 cm. The effect can be attributed more to steeper penumbra than to finer leaf resolution. Comparing circular collimators at different SVID just as MLC-shaped collimators, always the GI was reduced. Even MLC-shaped collimator at SVID 70 cm had better healthy tissue sparing than an optimal shaped circular collimator at SID 100 cm. Regarding penumbra changes due to varying SVID, the results of the planning study are underlined by film dosimetry measurements with Agility™ MLC.Conclusion: Penumbra requires more attention in comparing studies, especially studies using different planning systems. Reduced SVID probably allows usage of conventional MLC for STX-like irradiations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To develop a technique for radiation (RT) of in-transit path ways (IT) in Merkel cell carcinoma. Method In the planning study, IT were ink-marked on the skin during sentinel lymphscintigraphy and wire-marked in planning-CT. Pre- and post-operative planning-CTs were acquired. The clinical target volume (CTV) included tumor bed plus safety margin, IT and draining nodes, the planning volume (PTV) the CTV plus 0.5–1 cm margin. VMAT plans with 2–3 arcs were analyzed. Results A planning study was performed for five pts. including two pts. with primary tumor (PT) in head and neck, 1 pt. each with PT of elbow, forearm and upper leg respectively. Plans showed satisfactory PTV coverage: D mean 100% ± 0%, D 98% 92.4% ± 2.24%, homogeneity index (HI) 0.095 ± 0.01, conformation number (CN) 0.84 ± 0.01 and conformality index (CI) 0.95 ± 0.01. Conclusion The planning study confirms feasibility of highly conformal irradiation of IT pathways based on individualized target delineation. Currently, patients referred for non-metastatic MCC are encouraged to enroll in a prospective clinical study that evaluates the feasibility of radiation of IT pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and well tolerated treatment for selected brain metastases; however, local recurrence still occurs. We investigated the use of diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) as an adjunct for SRS treatment planning in brain metastases. Seventeen consecutive patients undergoing complete surgical resection of a solitary brain metastasis underwent image analysis retrospectively. SRS treatment plans were generated based on standard 3D post-contrast T1-weighted sequences at 1.5T and then separately using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in a blinded fashion. Control scans immediately post operation confirmed complete tumour resection. Treatment plans were compared to one another and with volume of local recurrence at progression quantitatively and qualitatively by calculating the conformity index (CI), the overlapping volume as a proportion of the total combined volume, where 1 = identical plans and 0 = no conformation whatsoever. Gross tumour volumes (GTVs) using ADC and post-contrast T1-weighted sequences were quantitatively the same (related samples Wilcoxon signed rank test = −0.45, p = 0.653) but showed differing conformations (CI 0.53, p < 0.001). The diffusion treatment volume (DTV) obtained by combining the two target volumes was significantly greater than the treatment volume based on post contrast T1-weighted MRI alone, both quantitatively (median 13.65 vs. 9.52 cm, related samples Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.001) and qualitatively (CI 0.74, p = 0.001). This DTV covered a greater volume of subsequent tumour recurrence than the standard plan (median 3.53 cm vs. 3.84 cm, p = 0.002). ADC maps may be a useful tool in addition to the standard post-contrast T1-weighted sequence used for SRS planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the dose to the humeral head planning risk volume with the currently used high tangential fields (HTF) and compare different planning techniques for breast radiotherapy including axillary level I and II lymph nodes (PTVn) while sparing the humeral head.Methods: Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled in a planning study with 16 fractions of 2.66 Gy. Four planning techniques were compared: HTF, HTF with sparing of the humeral head, 6-field IMRT with sparing of the humeral head and VMAT with sparing of the humeral head. The humeral head + 10 mm was spared by restricting V40Gy < 1 cc.Results: The dose to the humeral head was too high with HTF (V40Gy on average 20.7 cc). When sparing the humeral head in HTF, PTVn V90% decreased significantly from 97.9% to 89.4%. 6-field IMRT and VMAT had a PTVn V90% of 98.2% and 99.5% respectively. However, dose to the lungs, heart and especially the contralateral breast increased with VMAT.Conclusions: The humeral head is rarely spared when using HTF. When sparing the humeral head, the 6-field IMRT technique leads to adequate PTV coverage while not increasing the dose to the OARs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]