Search

Aims: Although dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is currently recommended in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), its use in elderly patients remains challenging. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor 60 vs. 90 mg twice daily among elderly patients (≥75 years) with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods and Results: PLINY The ELDER (NCT04739384) was a randomized, crossover trial testing the non-inferiority of a lower vs. standard dose of ticagrelor with respect to the primary endpoint of P2Y12 inhibition as determined by pre-dose P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) using the VerifyNow-P2Y12 (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA). Other pharmacodynamic tests included light transmittance aggregometry, multiple electrode aggregometry, and response to aspirin. Plasma levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX were also evaluated. A total of 50 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 4.0 years, females 44%) were included in the trial. Ticagrelor 60 mg was non-inferior to ticagrelor 90 mg according to VerifyNow-P2Y12 results (PRU 26.4 ± 32.1 vs. 30.4 ± 39.0; least squares mean difference: -4; 95% confidence interval: -16.27 to 8.06; P for non-inferiority = 0.002). Other pharmacodynamic parameters were similar between the two ticagrelor doses and there were no differences in response to aspirin. Plasma levels of ticagrelor (398.29 ± 312.36 ng/mL vs. 579.57 ± 351.73 ng/mL, P = 0.006) and its active metabolite were significantly lower during treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg., Conclusion: Although plasma concentrations were lower, ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily provided a similar magnitude of platelet inhibition compared with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily among elderly patients undergoing PCI., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may balance ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain how different P2Y12 inhibitors used as monotherapy affect outcomes., Methods and Results: Randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (≤3 months) vs. 12-month DAPT in ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All analyses included an interaction term for the P2Y12 inhibitor used as monotherapy. Trial sequential analyses were run to explore whether the effect estimate of each outcome may be affected by further studies. Seven trials encompassing 27 284 ACS patients were included. Compared with 12-month DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT was associated with no difference in MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.12] and a significant reduction in net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94), any bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66), and major bleeding (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60). Significant interactions for subgroup difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy were found for MACE (Pint = 0.016), all-cause death (Pint = 0.042), NACE (Pint = 0.018), and myocardial infarction (Pint = 0.028). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusive evidence of improved NACE with ticagrelor, but not with clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with standard DAPT., Conclusions: In patients with ACS, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT halves bleeding without increasing ischaemic events compared with standard DAPT. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel monotherapy, reduced MACE, NACE, and mortality compared with standard DAPT, supporting its use after aspirin discontinuation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: First-pass successful reperfusion (FPSR), defined as a successful/complete reperfusion achieved after a single thrombectomy pass, is predictive of favorable outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion. It is unknown whether intravenous tirofiban is effective in increasing the rate of FPSR in acute anterior large-vessel occlusion stroke., Methods and Results: Patients who had acute large-vessel occlusion stroke presenting within 24 hours and underwent endovascular thrombectomy were analyzed from the RESCUE BT (Intravenous Tirofiban for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) clinical trial, of which the main analysis was neutral. The RESCUE BT trial randomized patients to receive either intravenous tirofiban or placebo before endovascular thrombectomy. The primary end point was FPSR, defined as successful reperfusion (extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b50, 2c, or 3) at first thrombectomy attempt. A modified Poisson regression analysis assessed the association between intravenous tirofiban treatment and FPSR. Of 948 enrolled patients, 463 patients were randomized to the tirofiban group and 485 to the placebo group. The mean age was 67 years, and 41.0% of the patients were women. FPSR was achieved more often in the tirofiban group (30.5% versus 23.5%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.01-1.51]; P =0.04). FPSR was associated with a favorable shift to lower modified Rankin Scale disability levels at 90 days (common odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.86]; P =0.01)., Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT trial, treatment with intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy was associated with increased FPSR in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. FPSR was associated with reduced 90-day levels of disability., Registration: URL: http://chictr.org; Unique Identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Introduction: Stent-assisted coil embolisation (SACE) for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms has been increasingly used. Long-term advantages of antiplatelet therapy (APT) post-SACE treatment are still not well understood. We investigated the long-term effects of APT on clinical prognosis after SACE., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using nationwide health insurance claims data from South Korea, including patients with cerebral aneurysm treated with SACE from January 2009 to December 2020. The study outcomes consisted of the occurrence of cerebral infarction and major haemorrhage. To evaluate the impact of APT, we employed a multivariable time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model for each of the three distinct periods: 1-12 months, 12-24 months and >24 months after SACE., Results: This study included 17 692 unruptured cerebral aneurysm patients treated with SACE. During the mean follow-up of 4.2 years, there were 379 (2.1%) patients with cerebral infarction and 190 (1.1%) patients with major haemorrhage. The percentage of patients receiving APT was 79.5% at 1 year, which gradually decreased to 58.3% at 2 years after SACE. APT was beneficial in preventing cerebral infarction within 12 months after SACE (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.89; p=0.014). After 12 months, this association was not evident. APT increased the risk of haemorrhage after 24 months (aHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.87; p=0.016)., Discussion and Conclusion: Our findings suggest that in patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysm treated with SACE, the reasonable duration of APT for preventing cerebral infarction might be 1 year after SACE., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MB received research grants from Daewoong Pharmaceuticals. JY received research grants from Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceuticals. JK received research grants from Chong Kun Dang and Myung In Pharmaceuticals. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aims: Aspirin is considered mandatory after myocardial infarction (MI). However, its long-term efficacy has been questioned. This study investigated the effectiveness of long-term aspirin after MI., Methods and Results: Patients ≥40 years with MI from 2004 to 2017 who were adherent to aspirin 1 year after MI were included from Danish nationwide registries. At 2, 4, 6, and 8 years after MI, continued adherence to aspirin was evaluated. Absolute and relative risks of MI, stroke, or death at 2 years from each time point were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis with average treatment effect modelling standardized for age, sex, and comorbidities. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex and age > and ≤65 years. Among 40 116 individuals included, the risk of the composite endpoint was significantly higher for non-adherent patients at all time points. The absolute risk was highest at 2-4 years after MI for both adherent [8.34%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-8.64%] and non-adherent patients (10.72%, 95% CI: 9.78-11.66%). The relative risk associated with non-adherence decreased from 4 years after index-MI and onwards: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.27-1.55) at 4-6 years and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06-1.36) at 8-10 years (Ptrend = 0.056). Aspirin non-adherence in women and individuals >65 years was not associated with increased risk. Pinteraction at each of the time points: Age - <0.001, <0.001, 0.002, 0.51; Sex - 0.25, 0.02, 0.02, 0.82., Conclusion: Non-adherence to long-term aspirin was associated with increased risk of MI, stroke, or death, but not in women or individuals >65 years. The risk decreased from 4 years after MI with near statistical significance., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: Evidence of the optimal antiplatelet therapy for elderly patients who had a stroke is limited, especially those elder than 80 years. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in old-old patients compared with younger patients in the ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial., Methods: CHANCE-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China involving patients with high-risk transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. In our substudy, all enrolled patients were stratified by age: old-old (≥80 years), young-old (65-80 years) and younger (<65 years). The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding within 90 days, respectively., Results: Of all the 6412 patients, 406 (6.3%) were old-old, 2755 (43.0%) were young-old and 3251 (50.7%) were younger. Old-old patients were associated with higher composite vascular events (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.98, p=0.048), disabling stroke (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.88, p=0.0002), severe or moderate bleeding (HR 8.40, 95% CI 1.95 to 36.21, p=0.004) and mortality (HR 7.56, 95% CI 2.23 to 25.70, p=0.001) within 90 days. Ticagrelor-aspirin group was associated with lower risks of stroke recurrence within 90 days in younger patients (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91, p=0.008), which was no differences in old-old patients., Conclusion: Elderly patients aged over 80 in CHANCE-2 trial had higher risks of composite vascular events, disabling stroke, severe or moderate bleeding and mortality within 90 days. Genotype-guided DAPT might not be as effective in old-old patients as in younger ones., Trial Registration Number: NCT04078737., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SCJ reports compensation from Everest CRO for data and safety monitoring services and compensation from AstraZeneca AB for consultant services. PMB reports grants from Alzheimer’s Society; compensation from DiaMedica for consultant services; compensation from Sanofi for consultant services; compensation from Phagenesis for consultant services; compensation from Moleac for consultant services; grants from British Heart Foundation; and grants from NIHR. YoW reports grants from Amgen; compensation from SANOFI-AVENTIS US for consultant services; grants from SANOFI-AVENTIS US; and grants from AstraZeneca. The other authors report no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Despite the use of conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the risk of adverse events remains high among patients with increased thrombotic risk. Until recently, the optimal antiplatelet strategy to balance the ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients who are undergoing complex high-risk PCI has been unclear. The TAILored Versus COnventional AntithRombotic StratEgy IntenDed for Complex HIgh-Risk PCI (TAILORED-CHIP) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a time-dependent tailored antiplatelet therapy with an early (<6 months post-PCI) escalation (low-dose ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin) and a late (>6 months post-PCI) de-escalation (clopidogrel monotherapy) in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI as compared with standard DAPT (clopidogrel plus aspirin for 12 months). Eligible patients had to have at least one high-risk anatomical or procedural feature or clinical characteristic associated with an increased risk of ischaemic or thrombotic events. The primary endpoint was the net clinical outcome, a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularisation, or clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5) at 12 months after randomisation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03465644).

Antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor, in combination with aspirin, is standard of care for medical management of patients with coronary artery disease, and flexibility in prescribing options among these medications offers great potential for individualizing patient care. Previously, we showed that a loss-of-function missense mutation (G143E) in carboxylesterase 1 (CES1), the primary enzyme responsible for clopidogrel degradation, significantly impacts on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation and recurrent cardiovascular event risk. In the current investigation, we conducted a prospective randomized crossover study of clopidogrel (75 mg/day for 7 days) and ticagrelor (180 mg/day for 7 days) in 50 individuals stratified by CES1 G143E genotype (N = 34 143GG and 16 143GE) to determine the effect of drug choice on inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). Consistent with prior reports, we observed strong association between G143E and adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation following clopidogrel administration (IPA = 71.6 vs. 48.0% in 143E-allele carriers vs. non-carriers, respectively, p = 3.8 × 10 -5 ). Similar significant effects on platelet aggregation were also noted between 143E-allele carriers versus non-carriers in response to stimulation with arachidonic acid (45.8 vs. 25.8%, p = 0.04), epinephrine (44.4 vs. 18.8%, p = 0.03), and collagen (5 μg/mL, 25.8 vs. 11.4%, p = 3.7 × 10 -3 ). In contrast, no relationship between CES1 G143E and IPA was observed following ticagrelor administration regardless of the platelet agonist used. Collectively, these data suggest that on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation is substantially modified by CES1 G143E genotype, that this variant does not modify ticagrelor pharmacodynamics, and that more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation may be achieved by using ticagrelor in patients who carry clopidogrel response-modifying alleles in CES1., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Balancing the risks of ischemic and bleeding events in patients who have undergone coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stents (DES) is a delicate task. Individuals recovering from myocardial infarction are at increased risk of recurrent ischemic events, highlighting the potential benefits of rigorous secondary prevention measures. 1 Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combining aspirin with P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel or ticagrelor, forms the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) care aimed at preventing stent thrombosis and lowering the risk of ischemic events. Current medical guidelines recommend a 6-month duration of DAPT for stable coronary disease and 12 months for acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2024.)

Background: In the AUGUSTUS trial (An Open-Label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs Aspirin Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), the combination of dual antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation increased the risk of bleeding without reducing ischemic events compared with a P2Y12 inhibitor plus oral anticoagulation among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention. However, AUGUSTUS enrolled patients up to 14 days after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, and there may be a benefit to dual antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation early after an ischemic event., Methods: In this secondary analysis of AUGUSTUS, we divided patients into groups based on whether they were enrolled <6 days (early) or ≥6 days (later) after their index acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, and tested the interaction between time from the index event to enrollment and randomized treatment (apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo) on 30-day and 6-month clinical outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Among 4605 patients enrolled in AUGUSTUS with data available on time from the index event to enrollment, the median time from the index event to enrollment was 6 (range, 0-14) days. There were no significant interactions between time from the index event and aspirin versus placebo on clinical outcomes at 30 days or 6 months, though patients with time from the index event <6 days had a nominally significant reduction in death or ischemic events at 30 days with aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.30-0.99]), whereas patients with time from the index event ≥6 days did not (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.54-1.43]; interaction P =0.23). There were no significant interactions between time from the index event and apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist on clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Among patients with atrial fibrillation with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no difference in the relative benefit of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist or aspirin versus placebo when patients were enrolled early versus later after their index event., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02415400., Competing Interests: Dr Fanaroff: research grants from the American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc; and consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Laboratories. Dr Granger: research grants from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), GlaxoSmithKline, The Medicines Company, Medtronic Foundation, Medtronic, Inc, and Novartis; consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, The Medicines Company, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Novartis, Sirtex, Verseon, Apple, Medscape, LLC, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, and Rho Pharmaceuticals. Dr Goodman: research grant support and speaker/consulting honoraria from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, CYTE, Ltd, Daiichi-Sankyo/American Regent, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, JAMP Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pendopharm/Pharmascience, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, and Valeo Pharma; salary support/honoraria from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario/University of Toronto (Polo) Chair, Canadian Heart Failure Society, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian Virtual Coordinating Centre for Global Collaborative Cardiovascular Research, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Centre for Clinical Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, New York University Clinical Coordinating Centre, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (Brigham Health). Dr Aronson: employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Windecker: research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse, Inc, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, MedAlliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; advisory board member and steering/executive group member of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; steering/executive committee group member of several investigator-initiated trials funded by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Mehran: institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Bristol Myers Squibb/Sanofi, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, and OrbusNeich; consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Medscape, Siemens Medical Solutions, Roivant Sciences, Inc, and Sanofi; consulting (no fees) to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Spectranetics/Phillips/Volcano Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Watermark Research; executive committee member for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; <1% equity in Claret Medical and Elixir Medical. Dr Alexander: research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, CryoLife, CSL Behring, US FDA, NIH, Sanofi, and VoluMetrix; consulting fees from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Quantum Genomics, Teikoku Pharmaceuticals, VA Cooperative Studies, and Zafgen. Dr Lopes: research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Amgen, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic PLC, and Sanofi Aventis; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer AG. The other authors report no conflicts.

Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks may be a good alternative in patients under antithrombotic drugs. We evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing lower extremity wound debridement of whom antithrombotic drugs could not be stopped. We focused on hemorrhagic complications related to sciatic nerve block. Wound care patients followed by Cardiovascular Surgery Department scheduled for lower extremity wound surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Data was collected between March 2021 and September 2022. All patient were under antithrombotic therapy and discontinuation of anticoagulant drugs were not possible. Single-insertion and multiple-injection sciatic nerve block at popliteal region was applied to all patients under ultrasound guidance. Primary outcome was the rate of hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes were block onset times, block success and postoperative analgesia times. Data of 105 patients was evaluated, 87 were male and 18 were female. Mean patient age was 61.92 ± 10.06, mean patient body mass index was 25.68 ± 6.33. All patients were under 1 or more antithrombotic drugs. Only one minor hematoma was detected by postoperative ultrasonography control in 1 patient. Hemorrhage complication rate was 1 of 105 (% 0.95, 95% CI, 0.00024-0.051). Overall block success rate was 99.05%. Mean block onset time was 16.27 ± 5.69 minutes. Mean postoperative analgesia time was 19.5 ± 11.22 hours. Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound guidance using in-plane technique was safe and provided sufficient surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for lower extremity wound debridement surgery in patients on antithrombotic drugs., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: Identify risk factors for development of preeclampsia refractory to aspirin prophylaxis in women at high-risk of preeclampsia., Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 206 women identified as high-risk for preeclampsia through first-trimester screening and prescribed aspirin prophylaxis. We compared maternal characteristics, medical history, biochemical markers, and uterine artery Doppler indices between those with and without preeclampsia., Results: Women with preeclampsia had significantly higher rates of chronic hypertension (54.3% vs. 8.2%), higher first-trimester mean arterial pressure (MAP, 109.6 vs. 95.4 mmHg), and higher body mass index (BMI, 27.6 vs. 24.9) compared to controls. Second-trimester MAP and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were also significantly elevated in the preeclampsia group (103.3 mmHg and 1.39, respectively) compared to controls (89.7 mmHg and 1.05). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal second trimester UtA-PI cut-off of 1.36 for predicting preeclampsia, with sensitivity of 49% and specificity of 87.1%. When using a cut-off value of 0.77 for the second-to-first trimester UtA-PI ratio, the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 90.6%, respectively., Conclusion: Chronic hypertension, high first and second trimester MAP, higher BMI, and elevated second trimester UtA-PI are associated with preeclampsia despite aspirin prophylaxis. Evaluating second trimester UtA-PI or the ratio of second to first trimester UtA-PI may be a promising tool for identifying women who do not respond to aspirin., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Despite its high worldwide prevalence and the intuitable negative prognostic connotation, for a long time peripheral artery disease (PAD) has not been the subject of particular interest by the cardiac scientific community. The availability of a new therapeutic strategy (low-dose rivaroxaban associated with acetylsalicylic acid) has reignited interest in PAD. The clear evidence derived from the COMPASS and VOYAGER PAD trials, with the possibility of using dual pathway inhibition, has given new energy to the therapeutic front against symptomatic PAD also associated with coronary artery disease. This review article aims to revisit the pathophysiological concepts underlying PAD and the path of the various clinical trials that have led to new scientific evidence.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was noninferior to alteplase in minor nondisabling strokes in the ARAMIS trial (Antiplatelet Versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke); however, early neurological deterioration (END) associated with vessel stenosis may benefit from DAPT. We investigated whether the efficacy of DAPT was greater than alteplase in minor strokes with no large vessel occlusion (LVO)., Methods: This study was a prespecified post hoc analysis of the ARAMIS trial and included patients with responsible vessel examination in the as-treated analysis set of the ARAMIS trial who were divided into LVO group and non-LVO group. In each group, patients were further classified into DAPT and intravenous alteplase treatments. Primary outcome was END at 24 hours defined as more than or equal to 4-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and bleeding events during study. The primary analysis was estimated with a risk difference calculated by a generalized linear model including adjusted different baseline characteristics between treatments., Results: Of 723 patients from the ARAMIS trial, 480 patients were included: 36 were categorized into LVO group and 444 into non-LVO group, of whom 20 patients had END. Compared with intravenous alteplase, a lower proportion of END was found after DAPT treatment in the non-LVO group (adjusted risk difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -6.9% to -2.6%]; P <0.001), but not in the LVO group (adjusted risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI, -17.6% to 22.3%]; P =0.82). The interaction was marginally significant between groups ( P =0.06). In the non-LVO group, a lower proportion of bleeding events was found after DAPT treatment than intravenous alteplase (adjusted risk difference, -6.4% [95% CI, -8.9% to -3.9%]; P <0.001). Other safety outcomes were similar between the 2 treatments., Conclusions: Among minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke without LVO, DAPT may be superior to intravenous alteplase regarding preventing END with a better safety profile., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03661411., Competing Interests: None.

Aims: We conducted a prespecified subanalysis of the POEM trial to assess the association between sex and clinical outcomes following a short 1-month dual-antiplatelet-therapy (DAPT) period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (BP-EES) among patients at high bleeding risk (HBR)., Background: Shortening the DAPT period after PCI is an effective bleeding avoidance strategy with contemporary drug-eluting stents. Whether sex affects the risk of adverse events following PCI is still debated., Methods: Patients at HBR undergoing PCI with BP-EES were enrolled and treated with 1-month DAPT. If anticoagulation was needed, study participants received an oral anticoagulant (OAC) in addition to a P2Y 12 inhibitor for 1 month, followed by OAC only thereafter. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis at 12 months. We report sex-based outcomes of patients included in the POEM study., Results: We enrolled 129 (29.1%) women and 314 (70.9%) men. Women were older, with lower hemoglobin levels, and worse renal function. Accordingly, they had a trend for a greater number of HBR criteria fulfilled and a higher PARIS bleeding score. However, they were not at a significantly higher risk for the primary endpoint (men vs. women: 5.17% vs. 3.94%; HR 1.30; 95% CI: 0.48-3.54, p = 0.61), or any of the hemorrhagic and ischemic secondary endpoints., Conclusions: This prespecified subanalysis of the POEM trial suggests that 1-month DAPT following PCI with BP-EES may be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for women at HBR., (© 2024 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) rank among the most frequently prescribed medications to treat acid-related diseases. Mounting concerns surround the potential for serious adverse events, including cardiovascular events, associated with their prolonged use/misuse., Areas Covered: This comprehensive review explores cardiovascular adverse events linked to PPI use among high-risk cardiovascular patients. A structured search was conducted on PubMed., Expert Opinion: Many patients with cardiovascular disease who require antiplatelet treatment will require long-term PPI treatment. Interpreting the published data is not straightforward. First, because there is no plausible mechanistic explanation for PPIs to induce cardiovascular events apart from the potential interaction with the metabolism of thienopyridines. Although several observational studies have shown an increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients taking long-term PPIs, most available clinical trials and meta-analyses of available studies do not. However, the absence of firm evidence of this link does not necessarily imply that this association does not exist, and other hypothesis must be explored. Anemia is a common event in patients who take antiplatelet therapy and PPIs, and it is a factor associated with cardiovascular events and death. Anemia in these patients is often attributed to erosive lesions of the small intestine, where PPI may play a key role by modifying the microbiota.

Introduction: Despite advancements in coronary artery disease (CAD) management, major adverse cardiovascular events persist. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants present bleeding risks. Low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg) is approved by the European Society of Cardiology and the US Food and Drug Administration for CAD. The survival advantage and risk-benefit profile of combining low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin for CAD patients remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin monotherapy in CAD patients., Methods: We systematically searched databases for randomized controlled trials exploring low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin in CAD patients. Of the 6220 studies screened, five met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. The analysis employed a fixed-effects model, calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: Five randomized controlled trials involving 41,351 participants were included. Rivaroxaban (2.5 mg) significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95; P = 0.002), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006), and stroke (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.76; P < 0.00001) compared to aspirin alone. However, it increased major bleeding risk (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.40-1.97; P < 0.01). Meta-regression revealed no dose-dependent impact on all-cause mortality., Conclusion: Low-dose rivaroxaban demonstrates survival benefits and reduces myocardial infarction and stroke risks in CAD patients, albeit with an increased risk of major bleeding. Consideration of patient bleeding risk is crucial when adding rivaroxaban to antiplatelet therapy. Further research is warranted to compare its effectiveness and safety with dual antiplatelet therapy or P2Y12 inhibitors., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study investigated whether serum uric acid levels are more elevated in the aspirin-ticagrelor group than in the aspirin-clopidogrel group. Materials and Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with patients between 2013 and 2020. Baseline and maximum serum uric acid levels within a 6-month follow-up period were analyzed to determine the increase in both groups., Results: A total of 41,877 patients were enrolled. A statistically significant elevation of serum uric acid levels was found in the aspirin-ticagrelor group compared to the aspirin-clopidogrel group (odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)) = 1.36 (1.15 - 1.60), p < 0.001). Kidney dysfunction and diuretic use were also identified as risk factors for uric acid elevation., Conclusion: Monitoring serum uric acid levels is recommended during aspirin-ticagrelor therapy, especially in patients with kidney dysfunction or those using diuretics.

Objective: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by respiratory failure require antiplatelet regimens which often cannot be stopped and may increase bleeding from tracheostomy. However, there is limited available data on both the proportion of patients undergoing tracheostomy and the impact on antiplatelet regimens on outcomes., Methods: Utilizing the Vizient® Clinical Data Base, we identified patients ≥18 years admitted from 2015 to 2019 with a primary diagnosis of AMI and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We assessed for the incidence of patients undergoing tracheostomy, outcomes stratified by the timing of tracheostomy (≤10 vs >10 days), and the association between dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use and in-hospital mortality., Results: We identified 26 435 patients presenting with AMI requiring IMV. The mean (SD) age was 66.8 (12.3) years and 33.4% were women. The incidence of tracheostomy was 6.0% (n = 1573), and the median IMV time to tracheostomy was 12 days, 55.6% of which underwent percutaneous and 44.4% underwent open tracheostomy. Over 90% (n = 1424) underwent tracheostomy (>10 days) and had a similar mortality when compared to early (≤10 days) tracheostomy (22.5% vs 22.8%, P  = 0.94). On the day of tracheostomy, only 24.7% were given DAPT, which was associated with a lower mortality than those not on DAPT (17.4% vs 23.7%, P  = 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, DAPT use on the day of tracheostomy remained associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.94, P  = 0.02). Tracheostomy complications were not different between groups ( P  > 0.05), but more patients in the DAPT group required post-tracheostomy blood transfusions (5.6% vs 2.7%, P  = 0.01)., Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 20 intubated AMI patients requires tracheostomy. The lack of DAPT interruption on the day of tracheostomy but not the timing of tracheostomy was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality. Our results suggest that DAPT should not be a barrier to tracheostomy for patients with AMI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT (1-3 months) is a subject of research. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with continued DAPT after short duration of DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); net adverse clinical events (NACE); myocardial infarction (MI); major bleeding; death from any cause; definite or probable stent thrombosis; and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (Cochrane collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 test., Results: Of 3,208 results, five studies with 21,407 patients were included of which 50% received ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had reported follow up of 12 months. Major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.61; P  < 0.001], NACE (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; P  = 0.005), and all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P  = 0.04) were significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Other outcomes were comparable in both groups., Conclusion: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding, NACE and all-cause death as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months. Major ischemic outcomes were similar. Ticagrelor monotherapy is the way forward after short duration of DAPT after PCI in ACS., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of intracoronary (IC) low-dose tirofiban versus intravenous (IV) administration on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods: All published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of IC low-dose tirofiban (a bolus of ≤10 ug/kg) versus IV administration in patients with STEMI were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science from inception to June 2023, with no language restriction. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI were calculated., Results: Eleven RCTs involving 1,802 patients were included. Compared with the IV group, IC low-dose tirofiban was associated with improved major adverse cardiac events rate (RR 0.595, 95% CI 0.442-0.802; p=0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD 1.982, 95% CI 0.565-3.398; p=0.006), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade (RR 1.065, 95% CI 1.004-1.131; p=0.037), and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (RR 1.194, 95% CI 1.001-1.425; p=0.049). The two groups had no significant difference in bleeding events (RR 0.952, 95% CI 0.709-1.279; p=0.745)., Conclusions: Intracoronary low-dose tirofiban administration may be a safe and effective alternative to IV administration in STEMI patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is still controversial., Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) versus dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy in management of patients with isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients diagnosed on elective coronary angiography to have either isolated CAE or non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. Patients were assigned in 1:1 pattern to receive either VKA (warfarin) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). Patients were followed-up for nine-months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative events rate including acute coronary event, target vessel intervention, or cardiac death. Analysis of cumulative events at different time intervals, its individual components, and bleeding were considered secondary endpoints., Results: Cumulative events rate was 33%, with mortality rate of 2.5%. Both treatment groups showed comparable cumulative events during the nine-months follow-up duration. Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meier analysis beyond the first 3-months of follow-up showed significantly higher event-free survival among the VKA-group. Recurrent events (≥2) were significantly higher among the DAPT-group. Both groups showed no major bleeding events. Multivariable cox-regression analysis showed that presence of significant coronary tortuosity, use of DAPT in reference to VKA, and lower percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) among those receiving VKA were significant independent predictors of clinical adverse events beyond the first 3-months of follow-up., Conclusion: Cumulative adverse events were comparable among both treatment groups for isolated non-obstructive CAE. However, adverse events were significantly more frequent in the DAPT-group beyond the first three months., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The role of aspirin in cardiovascular primary prevention remains controversial. There are physiological reasons to explore its potential benefits in patients with high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], mainly due to its antifibrinolytic properties and interactions with platelets. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits and bleeding risks associated with aspirin use in patients who have elevated Lp(a) levels but no history of cardiovascular disease. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We performed a literature search to identify studies assessing the cardiovascular benefits and bleeding risks of aspirin use in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels (or a related genetic variant) who have no history of cardiovascular disease. Five studies (49,871 individuals) were considered for this systematic review. Three studies assessed the impact of aspirin use in relation to genetic variants associated with elevated Lp(a) levels (SNP rs379822), while the remaining two studies directly measured plasma levels of Lp(a). The endpoints evaluated varied among the studies. Overall, the findings consistently show that carriers of the apolipoprotein(a) variant or patients with Lp(a) levels > 50 mg/dL experience a reduction in cardiovascular risk with aspirin use. No significant bleeding issues were observed, although such events were reported in only two studies. This systematic review suggests that aspirin use in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels and no prior cardiovascular history may reduce cardiovascular risk. The available data on bleeding risk is insufficient., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: After drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of the femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR), a certain proportion of patients also experience target lesion restenosis. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin in the treatment of ISR after DCB intervention., Methods: Patients who underwent DCB treatment for ISR after femoropopliteal artery intervention at our center from March 2017 to February 2022 were included consecutively. According to the drug treatment after DCB intervention of ISR, the patients were divided into rivaroxaban and aspirin group (RA Group) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. The outcomes of 2 groups during the 12-month follow-up after DCB intervention were compared., Results: A total of 92 patients were included in final analysis, with 43 in RA group and 49 in DAPT group. During 12-month follow-up, a total of 15 cases of recurrent ISR were detected, and the recurrence rate of ISR and clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the RA group were lower than those in the DAPT group (P < 0.05). The vascular patency rate in the RA group was higher than that in the DAPT group at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (P < 0.05). During the follow-up, there were no adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, or major bleeding, and only a total of 5 cases of minor bleeding occurred., Conclusions: Compared with the standard DAPT regimen, rivaroxaban combined with aspirin can safely improve the follow-up outcome after DCB for femoropopliteal ISR., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We aim to research the efficacy and safety of single(SAPT), dual(DAPT), and triple(TAPT) antiplatelets approaches across IHD patients undergoing PCI., Methods and Results: A network meta-analysis was conducted until April 1st, 2024, using the netmeta package in R studio 4.3.3. Primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction(MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding(BARC 3-5). From 25 studies, a total of 65115 patients were included. For cardiac death, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.40 to 1.35); p-value = 0.33], [RR = 1.01, 95%CI (0.84 to 1.19); p-value = 0.87] respectively. For MI, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.77; 95%CI (0.51 to 1.16); p-value = 0.2047], [RR = 0.81, 95%CI (0.64 to 1.03); p-value = 0.0850] respectively. For stent thrombosis, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.45 to 1.21); p-value = 0.2284], [RR = 0.84, 95%CI (0.27 to 2.59); p-value = 0.7630] respectively. For stroke, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT in comparison to SAPT [RR = 0.91; 95%CI (0.75 to 1.10); p-value = 0.3209], and [RR = 0.87, 95%CI (0.43 to 1.76); p-value=0.6937], respectively. For Major bleeding(BARC 3-5), DAPT and TAPT increased major bleeding compared to SAPT, with only DAPT showing statistical significance. [RR = 1.43; 95%CI (1.09 to 1.88); p-value = 0.0107], and [RR = 2.78, 95%CI (0.90 to 4.78); p-value = 0.0852], respectively., Conclusion: DAPT and TAPT increased the risk of bleeding events compared to SAPT. However, we found no significant differences between these regimens for the other primary outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device has decreased thromboembolic events and minimized the risk of pump thrombosis. However, bleeding complications due to combined antithrombotic therapy with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin remain high. Only limited data on the safety of VKA monotherapy in HM3 patients are available. A systematic search on the main databases was performed. Observational data and randomized trials were eligible for this analysis. As primary endpoint, we analyzed hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE). As secondary endpoints, we investigated the individual components of the primary endpoint. The analysis was carried out using the odds ratio (OR) as outcome measure. A random-effects model was fitted to the data. Five manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These trials included 785 patients (381 on VKA monotherapy, 404 on VKA and aspirin). VKA monotherapy significantly reduced HRAE (OR: 0.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02-0.59], p = 0.01, I2 = 87%). The reduction was driven by a decrease in bleeding complications (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.02-0.62], p = 0.01, I2 = 86%) without increasing the rates of thromboembolic events (OR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.26-1.81], p = 0.45, I = 0%). Vitamin K antagonist monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction of bleeding events without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications in HM3 patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: T.S. received consulting/advisory fees from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., BiVACOR, Berlin Heart, and CorWave; and received grant support from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., Berlin Heart, and CorWave. D.W. is a proctor for Abbott Inc. and received consulting/advisory fees from Abbott Inc. and Xenios/Fresenius Medical Care. D.Z. is a proctor for and received speaker/consulting fees from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., Berlin Heart, Edwards, Abiomed, and grant support from Medtronic Inc. and Abbott Inc. T.G. received speaker/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Novartis, and Pfizer, and grant support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic and Abbott. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Background: The COMPASS trial demonstrated that in patients with atherosclerotic diseases, low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin provides greater protection against subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) than mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) alone. Drug acceptance and adherence maximizes this benefit. We have assessed drug acceptance and adherence to the COMPASS drug regime in patients following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis., Methods: Following CEA, the views of 63 patients on the COMPASS drug regime were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire and drug adherence was determined using the Sidorkiewicz scoring system. These views were compared with those of 54 patients on MAPT. Side effects (bleeding and drug reactions) and new MACE were recorded., Results: Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had strong positive views on the necessity to take these drugs (necessity scale 19.6 ± 3.6). Although there were some concerns about the COMPASS drug regimen, these were not strongly held (concern cscale 11.8 ± 4.9) and the necessity-concerns differential was positive (7.8 ± 6.2). The Drug Adherence Score was "High" to "Good" (level of drug adherence 1.7 ± 1.0). The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire scales and Drug Adherence Score of post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen were similar to those on MAPT. The incidence of post-CEA MACE and side effects were similar for those on the COMPASS drug regimen and MAPT., Conclusions: Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had positive views on taking the drugs and drug adherence was high. We did not identify any patient-related barriers to the use of the COMPASS drug regimen to further reduce cardiovascular events., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low-dose prasugrel (3.75 mg) is used as maintenance therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention; however, data on long-term outcomes are scarce., Methods and Results: We analyzed 5,392 participants in the KiCS-PCI registry who were administered low-dose prasugrel or clopidogrel at discharge between 2008 and 2018 and for whom 2-year follow-up data were available. We adjusted for confounders using matching weight analyses and multiple imputations. Similarly, we used inverse probability- and propensity score-weighted analyses. We also performed instrumental variable analyses. The primary outcomes were acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and bleeding requiring readmission. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death and a composite outcome of ACS, bleeding, heart failure, stroke, coronary bypass requiring admission, and all-cause death. In this cohort, 12.2% of patients were discharged with low-dose prasugrel. Compared with clopidogrel, low-dose prasugrel was associated with a reduced risk of ACS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.85), bleeding (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40-0.97), and the composite outcome (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.86). Inverse probability-weighted analysis yielded similar results; however, matching weight analysis without multiple imputations and propensity score-matched analyses showed similar outcomes in both groups. Instrumental variable analyses showed reduced risks of ACS and composite outcome for those on low-dose prasugrel. All-cause mortality did not differ in all analyses., Conclusions: Low-dose prasugrel demonstrates comparable outcomes to clopidogrel in terms of ACS and bleeding.

Introduction: An increasing number of patients attending coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) receive preoperative antiplatelet drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor). The optimal assessment of preoperative platelet function is the aim of this study for a shorter surgical timing in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting., Methods: This study was performed on patients presenting for first-time isolated CABG on therapy with an P2Y12 receptor blockers loading dose (clopidogrel [300 mg] or prasugrel [60 mg] or ticagrelor [180 mg]) or P2Y12 receptor blockers maintenance therapy at least for five days (clopidogrel [75 mg once daily], prasugrel [10 mg once daily], ticagrelor [90 mg twice daily]). All patients received simultaneously acetylsalicylate acid (100 mg daily). Exclusion criterion was emergency CABG regardless of preoperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. All patients' data were recorded in an Excel® file and analyzed using RStudio® software., Results: Forty-eight consecutive adult patients presenting for CABG were enrolled. Preoperative thromboelastography-platelet mapping showed platelet resistance to P2Y12 blockers receptor - 25% for clopidogrel (6/24), 33% for ticagrelor (6/18), 33% for prasugrel (2/6), and this data was useful to obtain a shorter CABG waiting time in comparison with current guidelines (2.7 vs. five days for clopidogrel, 2.5 vs. five days for ticagrelor, 3.3 vs. seven days for prasugrel)., Conclusion: Preoperative thromboelastography-platelet mapping is helpful to detect harmful P2Y12 receptor blockers resistance and to minimize CABG waiting time avoiding unnecessary and life-threatening delays.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a devastating and fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. The unique properties of cangrelor make it the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor for CS-AMI, in terms of both efficacy and safety. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03551964; EudraCT: 2018-002161-19) will assess the benefits of cangrelor in patients with an initial CS-AMI undergoing primary angioplasty. This randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of approximately 550 patients (with an allowed 10% increase) in 5 countries using a double-blind design will compare initial P2Y12 inhibitor treatment strategies in patients with CS-AMI of (A) intravenous cangrelor and (B) ticagrelor administered as crushed tablets at a loading dose of 180 mg. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke within 30 days. The main secondary endpoints are (1) the net clinical endpoint, defined as death, MI, urgent revascularisation of the infarct-related artery, stroke, or major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria; (2) cardiovascular-related death, MI, urgent revascularisation, or heart failure; (3) heart failure; and (4) cardiovascular-related death, all (1-4) within 1 year after study enrolment. A platelet reactivity study that tests the laboratory antiplatelet benefits of cangrelor, when given in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, will be conducted using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. The primary laboratory endpoints are the periprocedural rate of onset and the proportion of patients who achieve effective P2Y12 inhibition. The DAPT-SHOCK-AMI study is the first randomised trial to evaluate the benefits of cangrelor in patients with CS-AMI.

Background Context: The prevalence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has risen alongside the aging population, often necessitating neurosurgical intervention. However, managing antithrombotic medications in elderly patients with a history of major cardiovascular events (MACE) presents challenges, as treatment may require modification or cessation. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes among elderly patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and assess their impact and potential complications. The findings aim to inform the management of elderly patients with cardiovascular and spinal conditions undergoing neurosurgery., Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center. A total of 163 patients aged 60 or above who underwent lumbar discectomy for LDH were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their antithrombotic drug management: Group A (46 patients) replaced antiplatelet agents with low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention, Group B (54 patients) discontinued antiplatelet agents for primary prevention one week preoperatively and replaced them with LMWH, and Group C (63 patients) did not receive antithrombotic medication. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and postoperative hospitalization were analyzed across all three groups. Continuous variables were compared between groups using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, with significance set at p < 0.05., Results: No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss or surgical time among groups A, B, and C. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between groups B and C across all analyzed variables. No early or delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred perioperatively or during the 3-month postoperative follow-up period., Conclusions: The study suggests that elective discectomy surgery in patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies may proceed without early complications and can be safely continued perioperatively. These findings have implications for the management of elderly patients requiring neurosurgical intervention in the context of cardiovascular comorbidities., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Optimal duration and choice of antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain controversial., Methods and Results: Digital databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) were queried to select all randomized controlled trials on a post-percutaneous coronary intervention population with acute coronary syndrome. Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months was compared with 4 major strategies: high-potency, high- to low-potency, low-dose, and short-duration DAPT. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of different antiplatelet strategies. This study was the second updated manuscript under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration (CRD42021286552). Thirty-two randomized controlled trials comprising 103 459 (51 750 experimental, 51 709 control) patients were included. Compared with DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months, high- to low-potency DAPT (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.92]) and aspirin+prasugrel containing DAPT for 12 months (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]) had a significantly lower, whereas DAPT for 1 month followed by clopidogrel only (RR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.06-2.39]) had a higher, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (median follow-up). Prasugrel (RR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.66]) and ticagrelor (RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.17-1.62]) containing DAPT for 12 months had significantly higher rates, whereas high- to low-potency DAPT (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63-1.15]) had no significant risk of major bleeding., Conclusions: Aspirin and ticagrelor for 3 months, followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for the remaining duration, can be considered the optimal strategy for treating post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients with acute coronary syndrome because of a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by grant R01 HS027623 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr Bykov was also supported by National Institute of Health grant K01AG068365. Dr Bea was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant No. RS-2023-00273553). Dr Bykov has been a consultant for Alosa Health, unrelated to the study. Dr Huybrechts has been an investigator on grants to Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Takeda and UCB for unrelated work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Galli has received consulting fees or honoraria from Terumo, outside the present work. Dr Andreotti has received speaker or consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Servier, outside the present work. Dr Capodanno has received personal honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Terumo; and payment to his institution from Medtronic, outside the present work. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel | Dept. Klinische Forschung, Bristol-Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Terumo. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc., Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD, outside the submitted work; owns equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, ControlRad (via her spouse); and has received no fees from the American Medical Association (Scientific Advisory Board) and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); has served on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and has received honoraria from JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor) and the American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member, Member Clinical Trials Research Program). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura, outside the submitted work; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A new generation of modified surface flow diverters (FDs) and monotherapy using new antiplatelets may reduce both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications during the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Previous preliminary safety analysis of distal unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the FD p48 MW HPC (phenox-Wallaby, Bochum, Germany) under antiplatelet monotherapy with prasugrel showed promising results. However, the long term outcomes of distal intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs under antiplatelet monotherapy are not known., Methods: This was a single center, prospective, pivotal, open single arm study. The primary (safety) endpoint was absence of any new neurological deficits after treatment until the 24 month follow-up. The primary (efficacy) endpoint was the incidence of complete aneurysm occlusion 24 months after treatment. The secondary (efficacy) endpoints were any incidence of aneurysm dome reduction 24 months after treatment., Results: 21 patients harboring 27 distal aneurysms of the anterior circulation were included. No patient had neurologic deficits in the time from treatment to the 24 month follow-up. Complete aneurysm occlusion occurred in 20 (74%) of 27 aneurysms at the 24 month follow-up. Four aneurysms (14.8%) had dome reduction, and three aneurysms (11.1%) remained unchanged., Conclusions: In this pilot trial, treatment of distal unruptured intracranial aneurysms with an FD under monotherapy with prasugrel, followed by monotherapy with aspirin, appeared to be safe and effective. Randomized studies with long term follow-up are needed to confirm these results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: Clopidogrel-aspirin initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset is effective in patients with mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute High-risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial. Uncertainties remain about the duration of the treatment effect. This study aimed to assess duration of benefit and risk of clopidogrel-aspirin in these patients., Methods: The INSPIRES trial was a 2*2 factorial placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted in 222 hospitals in China. The 2 treatments did not interact and were evaluated separately. In this study, we performed secondary analyses based on antiplatelet treatment. All patients with mild stroke or TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause within 72 hours of symptom onset enrolled in the trial were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel-aspirin on days 1-21 followed by clopidogrel on days 22-90 or aspirin alone for 90 days. The primary efficacy outcome was major ischemic event which included the composite of ischemic stroke and nonhemorrhagic death. The primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. We estimated the risk difference between the 2 treatments for each stratified week., Results: All 6,100 patients in the trial were included (3,050 in each group). The mean age was 65 years, and 3,915 patients (64.2%) were men. Compared with aspirin alone, the reduction of major ischemic events by clopidogrel-aspirin mainly occurred in the first week (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1.42%, 95% CI 0.53%-2.32%) and remained in the second week (ARR 0.49%, 95% CI 0.09%-0.90%) and the third week (ARR 0.29%, 95% CI -0.05% to 0.62%). Numerical higher risk of moderate-to-severe bleedings in the clopidogrel-aspirin group was observed in the first 3 weeks (absolute risk increase 0.05% [95% CI -0.10% to 0.20%], 0.10% [95% CI -0.09% to 0.29%], and 0.18% [95% CI -0.03% to 0.40%] in the first, second, and third weeks, respectively)., Conclusions: Among patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause, the net benefit of clopidogrel-aspirin initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset was pronounced in the first week and continued to a lesser degree in the following 2 weeks, outweighing the low, but ongoing hemorrhagic risk., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that among patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause, the net benefit of clopidogrel-aspirin initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset was pronounced in the first week and continued to a lesser degree in the following 2 weeks, outweighing the low but ongoing hemorrhagic risk.

Background: Carriers of cytochrome 2C19 (CYP2C19) loss-of-function (LoF) alleles treated with clopidogrel have impaired drug metabolism, resulting in reduced active metabolite levels, high platelet reactivity (HPR), and an increased risk of thrombotic events. Several alternative antiplatelet therapies have been proposed to overcome HPR in these patients, but their comparative effects remain poorly explored., Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different oral antiplatelet therapies in carriers of CYP2C19 LoF alleles undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were included. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate mean difference (MD) or odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome was platelet reactivity assessed by VerifyNow and reported as P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU). The secondary outcome was the rate of HPR. Standard dose of clopidogrel (75 mg daily) was used as a reference treatment., Results: A total of 12 RCTs testing 6 alternative strategies (i.e. clopidogrel 150 mg, prasugrel 3.75 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, ticagrelor 90 mg bid, and adjunctive cilostazol 100 mg bid) were included in the network. Compared with standard-dose clopidogrel, the greatest reduction in PRU was observed with prasugrel 10 mg (MD -127.91; 95% CI -141.04; -114.78) and ticagrelor 90 mg bid (MD -124.91; 95% CI -161.78; -88.04), followed by prasugrel 5 mg (MD -76.33; 95% CI -98.01; -54.65) and prasugrel 3.75 mg (MD -73.00; 95% CI -100.28; -45.72). Among other strategies, adjunctive cilostazol (MD -42.64; 95% CI -64.72; -20.57) and high-dose clopidogrel (MD -32.11; 95% CI -51.33; -12.90) were associated with a modest reduction in PRU compared with standard-dose clopidogrel., Conclusion: Among carriers of CYP2C19 LoF alleles undergoing PCI, standard-dose prasugrel or ticagrelor are most effective in reducing platelet reactivity, while double-dose clopidogrel and additional cilostazol showed modest effects. Reduced-dose of prasugrel may represent a balanced strategy to overcome HPR without a significant increase in bleeding. The clinical implications of these pharmacodynamic findings warrant further investigation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention require a combination of oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The use of a coronary stent with a thromboresistant and pro-healing coating may allow an abbreviated duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without an increase in the risk of thromboembolic events., Methods: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with the COBRA polyzene F (PzF) stent followed by 14 days of DAPT or a Food and Drug Administration-approved new-generation drug-eluting stent followed by 3 or 6 months of DAPT. The bleeding coprimary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 beyond 14 days (or after hospital discharge) until 6 months. The thromboembolic coprimary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke at 6 months. The trial hypothesis was that the COBRA PzF stent strategy would be superior with respect to bleeding events and noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events., Results: A total of 996 patients underwent randomization. The bleeding end point occurred in 37 of 475 patients (7.8%) in the COBRA PzF group and 47 of 482 patients (9.8%) in the control group (difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.6 to 1.6]; P =0.14). The thromboembolic end point occurred in 37 of 492 patients (7.5%) in the COBRA PzF group and 24 of 490 patients (4.9%) in the control group (difference, 2.6%; prespecified noninferiority margin 5%, upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI of the difference, 5.2%; P noninferiority =0.07)., Conclusions: In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with the COBRA PzF stent plus 14 days of DAPT was not superior with respect to bleeding events and was not noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events at 6 months compared with treatment with standard Food and Drug Administration-approved drug-eluting stent plus 3 to 6 months of DAPT., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02594501., Competing Interests: Dr Byrne reports research or educational funding to the institution of current employment from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, and Translumina. Dr Maeng is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF22OC0074083), has received lecture and advisory board fees from Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk, has received research grants from Philips, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk, has ongoing research contracts with Novo Nordisk and Philips, and is a minor shareholder in Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. Dr Brunner is a previous employee of CeloNova. Dr Urban reports personal consulting fees from and is a shareholder of MedAlliance, Nyon, Switzerland, outside of the submitted work. Dr Cutlip reports contracted research support paid to institution of current employment from Celonova. Dr Kirtane reports Institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, CathWorks, Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Philips, ReCor Medical, Neurotronic, Biotronik, Chiesi, Bolt Medical, Magenta Medical, Canon, SoniVie, and Shockwave Medical. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for consulting and/or speaking engagements in which Dr Kirtane controlled the content. Personal: Travel Expenses/Meals from Amgen, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CathWorks, Edwards, Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Novartis, Philips, Abiomed, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, Zoll, Shockwave, and Regeneron. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Little is known about the use of cangrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS)., Methods: CAMEO (Cangrelor in Acute MI: Effectiveness and Outcomes) is a multicenter observational registry evaluating platelet inhibition in patients with MI. We examined the duration of cangrelor infusion and the amount of time to transition from cangrelor to an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor in patients with CS. We also assessed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding risks, stratified by dosage duration, time to transition and oral P2Y 12 inhibitor potency., Results: Among 2352 cangrelor-treated patients with MI, 249 patients were in CS. Among the patients with CS, 16 (6.4%) received the "bridge" infusion dose, 202 (81.1%) the PCI cangrelor infusion dose, and 30 (12.0%) had a combination of both infusion doses. Patients with CS had a median age of 66 years; 32% were women; 21% were Black patients; 35% had diabetes; 19% received thrombectomy; and 59% received mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (35% intra-aortic balloon pump, 27% Impella). The median duration of infusion was 3.9 (2-21.5 hours) in patients with CS and was 2 (1.6-3.1 hours) for all cangrelor-treated patients. The median duration of transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y 12 inhibitor administration was 0.1 (-0.5-21.0 hours) for patients with CS. In multivariable modeling, chronic lung disease and the use of MCS and was associated with longer cangrelor infusions (defined as > 3.9 hours). Among cangrelor-treated patients with CS, 24.1% of these patients had a bleeding event, and 41.8% had a MACE event. After adjustment, a longer cangrelor infusion duration was associated with increased risk of bleeding (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The median duration of cangrelor infusion was longer for patients presenting with CS. Use of MCS was associated with longer cangrelor infusion durations in patients with CS. Further work is needed to understand the pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet agents in patients with CS., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are routinely used for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) while antiplatelet agents are used in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data regarding the comparative clinical outcomes of OAC monotherapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulant plus antiplatelet agent) in patients with AF and stable CAD are limited., Methods: A comprehensive search of major databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed from inception to September 1, 2024 to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared OAC monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD. The risk ratios (RRs) were estimated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes., Results: A total of three RCTs reported data for 3945 patients with AF and stable CAD. The mean age of patients was 73.8 (±11.85) years and the mean follow-up was 22 months. OAC monotherapy was associated with a significantly reduced relative risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.95) compared to dual therapy. The risk of all-cause death (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.49-1.48), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.50-1.41), any stroke event (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.46-1.18), and myocardial infarction (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.79-3.12) remained comparable across the two groups., Conclusion: OAC monotherapy led to a significant relative risk reduction for major bleeding with similar rates of ischemic events and mortality compared to dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: No randomized data exist on ultrathin-strut stents in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Supraflex Cruz stent with the thin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster Tansei stent in patients at HBR with abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy after stenting., Methods: In the investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label COMPARE 60/80 HBR trial (Comparison of the Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron Stent Strut Versus the Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron Stent Strut in HBR Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Population), 741 patients at HBR according to the Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria were randomized to receive either the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Supraflex Cruz stent or thin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster Tansei stent. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended according to the applicable guidelines and trial data for patients at HBR. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events, the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding, and was powered for noninferiority with an absolute margin of 4.0% at 1-sided 2.5% alpha., Results: Between September 2020 and August 2022, 371 patients were randomized to the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Supraflex Cruz stent and 370 patients to the thin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster Tansei stent at 11 sites in the Netherlands. At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 56 (15.4%) patients in the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Supraflex Cruz stent group and 61 (17.1%) in the thin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster Tansei stent group (risk difference, -1.65%; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 3.74; P =0.02 for noninferiority at a 0.025 significance level and P =0.55 for 2-sided superiority at a 0.05 significance level)., Conclusions: Among patients at HBR with abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy post-stenting, the use of an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Supraflex Cruz stent was noninferior compared with the use of a thin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster Tansei stent., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04500912., Competing Interests: Dr Smits reports personal fees from Terumo and Abiomed, institutional grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular and Microport, and institutional grants from SMT. Dr Hofma reports an institutional grant from Terumo. Dr Oemrawsingh reports speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Philips. Dr Paradies reports speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular and institutional grants from Abbott Vascular. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: After coronary stent implantation, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) increases bleeding risk, requiring personalization of DAPT duration. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict optimal DAPT duration after contemporary drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease., Methods and Results: The One-Month DAPT, RESET (Real Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation), and IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesion) trials provided a derivation cohort (n=6568). Using the X-learner approach, an individualized DAPT score was developed to determine the therapeutic benefit of abbreviated (1-6 months) versus standard (12-month) DAPT using various predictors. The primary outcome was major bleeding; the secondary outcomes included 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and 1-year net adverse clinical events. The risk reduction with abbreviated DAPT (3 months) in the individualized DAPT-determined higher predicted benefit group was validated in the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial (n=3056), which enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor. The validation cohort comprised 1527 abbreviated and 1529 standard DAPT cases. Major bleeding occurred in 25 (1.7%) and 45 (3.0%) patients in the abbreviated and standard DAPT groups, respectively. The individualized DAPT score identified 2582 (84.5%) participants who would benefit from abbreviated DAPT, which was significantly associated with a lower major bleeding risk (absolute risk difference [ARD], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.15-2.36]) and net adverse clinical events (ARD, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.07-3.10]) but not major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.61]), compared with standard DAPT in the higher predicted benefit group. Abbreviated DAPT had no significant difference in clinical outcomes of major bleeding (ARD, 1.49 [95% CI, -1.74 to 4.72]), net adverse clinical events (ARD, 2.57 [95% CI, -1.85 to 6.99]), or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 1.54 [95% CI, -1.26 to 4.34]), compared with standard DAPT in the individualized DAPT-determined lower predicted benefit group., Conclusions: Machine learning using the X-learner approach identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome who may benefit from abbreviated DAPT after drug-eluting stent implantation, laying the groundwork for personalized antiplatelet therapy.

For patients presenting with a cerebral episode of vascular origin whose pathogenetic mechanism is due to large vessel disease affecting the carotid arteries, different intervention strategies for secondary prophylaxis are available: medical (single or dual antiplatelet therapy), surgical or endovascular. In this review, these strategies will be described, along with suggestions for appropriate application in clinical practice. These suggestions may vary depending on whether early or long-term secondary prophylaxis is considered.

Early mechanical reperfusion, primarily via percutaneous coronary intervention, combined with timely antithrombotic drug administration, constitutes the main approach for managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Clinicians have access to a variety of antithrombotic agents, necessitating careful selection to balance reducing thrombotic events against increased bleeding risks. This review offers a comprehensive update on current antithrombotic therapy in ACS, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The antithrombotic management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) involves a 6-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), followed by chronic aspirin therapy. In patients with a baseline indication for anticoagulation, a variable duration of triple antithrombotic therapy is administered, followed by dual antithrombotic therapy until the sixth month post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and ultimately a transition to chronic anticoagulation. However, advancements in stent technology reducing the risk of stent thrombosis and a growing focus on the impact of bleeding on prognosis have prompted the development of new therapeutic strategies. These strategies aim to enhance protection against ischemic events in the initial stages after PCI while mitigating the risk of bleeding in the long term. This article delineates the therapeutic strategies outlined in European and American guidelines for CCS management, with special attention to investigational strategies., Competing Interests: Disclosures D. Capodanno declares speakers’ honoraria from Sanofi Aventis., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)