Search

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (mirvetuximab) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a humanized folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding monoclonal antibody attached via a cleavable linker to the cytotoxic maytansinoid molecule, DM4. FRα is expressed in several epithelial cancers, including high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Mirvetuximab received accelerated approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2022 based on the results of the SORAYA trial, which tested mirvetuximab for the treatment of patients with recurrent platinum resistant HGSOC with high FRα expression and showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 32.4% and a median duration of response of 6.9 months. Mirvetuximab toxicities included low grade ocular and gastrointestinal toxicities. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) ovarian cancer 2023 guidelines adopted mirvetuximab as 2A, and mirvetuximab combined with bevacizumab as 2B, recommendations. This manuscript will review the preclinical and clinical development of mirvetuximab, the toxicities associated with mirvetuximab and mitigation strategies, and future applications of mirvetuximab. Mirvetuximab represents the first biomarker-directed therapy with an indication specifically for the treatment of PROC. The efficacy and favorable safety profile support further development of mirvetuximab and mirvetuximab combinations in platinum sensitive and newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) accounts for approximately 8–10% of epithelial ovarian cancers in the United States. Although it is rare, OCCC usually presents with treatment challenges and the overall prognosis is far worse than high grade serous ovarian cancer HGSOC. The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic relevance of combining oncolytic virus with cisplatin for ovarian cancer clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Results We identified that TMEM205, a recently discovered transmembrane protein, contributes to chemoresistance in OCCC cells via the exosomal pathway. Mechanistically, TMEM205 undergoes ligand-independent constitutive endocytosis and co-localizes with Rab11 to contribute to the late recycling endosomes in a clathrin-independent manner. Further, we observed that oncolytic virus (oHSV) pretreatment followed by treatment with cisplatin decreases TMEM205 expression and sensitizes cells to cisplatin in a synergistic manner in OCCC cells. TMEM205 interacts with glycoprotein-C of oHSV post-infection; both of these proteins undergo ubiquitination and ultimately get shuttled outside the cell via exosomes. Thus, we demonstrate the mechanotransduction pathway of TMEM205-mediated chemoresistance along with targeting this pathway using oHSV and cisplatin as a powerful therapeutic strategy for OCCC. oHSV combination with cisplatin inhibits OCCC tumor growth in vivo in immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice models. Conclusion Our results suggest that the combination of oHSV and cisplatin in immunocompetent as well as immune deficient OCCC tumor bearing mice reduces overall tumor burden as well as metastatic disease thereby providing survival benefit. Additionally, the detection of TMEM205 in exosomal cargo early in OCCC development has potential to be exploited as a biomarker.

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic cancer in the US and ranks among the top 10 causes of female cancer-related deaths. Platinum-resistant disease carries a particularly poor prognosis and leaves patients with limited remaining therapeutic options. Patients with platinum-resistant disease have significantly lower response rates to additional chemotherapy, with estimates as low as 10%-25%. We hypothesize that in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, treatment with immunotherapy followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy results in prolonged survival without compromising quality of life. Our experience of 3 patients with recurrent, metastatic platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with immunotherapy followed by anti-angiogenic treatment plus chemotherapy resulted in progression-free survival durations significantly above previously published averages. Further studies evaluating the role of immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy in combination with drugs targeting angiogenesis are needed and may provide a long-sought after breakthrough for advancing survival in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) accounts for approximately 8–10% of epithelial ovarian cancers in the United States. Although it is rare, OCCC usually presents with treatment challenges and the overall prognosis is far worse than high grade serous ovarian cancer HGSOC. The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic relevance of combining oncolytic virus with cisplatin for ovarian cancer clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Results: We identified that TMEM205, a recently discovered transmembrane protein, contributes to chemoresistance in OCCC cells via the exosomal pathway. Mechanistically, TMEM205 undergoes ligand-independent constitutive endocytosis and co-localizes with Rab11 to contribute to the late recycling endosomes in a clathrin-independent manner. Further, we observed that oncolytic virus (oHSV) pretreatment followed by treatment with cisplatin decreases TMEM205 expression and sensitizes cells to cisplatin in a synergistic manner in OCCC cells. TMEM205 interacts with glycoprotein-C of oHSV post-infection; both of these proteins undergo ubiquitination and ultimately get shuttled outside the cell via exosomes. Thus, we demonstrate the mechanotransduction pathway of TMEM205-mediated chemoresistance along with targeting this pathway using oHSV and cisplatin as a powerful therapeutic strategy for OCCC. oHSV combination with cisplatin inhibits OCCC tumor growth in vivo in immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice models. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the combination of oHSV and cisplatin in immunocompetent as well as immune deficient OCCC tumor bearing mice reduces overall tumor burden as well as metastatic disease thereby providing survival benefit. Additionally, the detection of TMEM205 in exosomal cargo early in OCCC development has potential to be exploited as a biomarker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-grade serous ovarian cancer, the most frequent type of ovarian cancer, has a poor prognosis and novel treatments are needed for patients with platinum resistant/refractory disease. New therapeutic strategies targeting cell cycle checkpoints, including CHK1 inhibition with prexasertib, may help improve clinical response and overcome resistance. Patients with ovarian cancer (N = 169) were assigned to 4 cohorts as part of the Phase 2 multicenter trial (NCT03414047): Cohort 1: platinum resistant, BRCA-wildtype with ≥3 lines prior therapy; Cohort 2: platinum resistant BRCA-wildtype with <3 lines prior therapy; Cohort 3: platinum resistant, BRCA-mutated with prior PARP inhibitor therapy; Cohort 4: platinum refractory, BRCA-mutated, or BRCA-wildtype with any number of prior therapy lines. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), and safety. DNA from tumor biopsies was sequenced to identify biomarkers. The ORR in platinum resistant patients (Cohorts 1--3) was 12.1%, and 6.9% in platinum refractory patients. In platinum resistant patients, DCR was 37.1%, and consistent across cohorts. In platinum refractory patients, DCR was 31.0%. Consistent with the prexasertib mechanism of action, the most common treatment related adverse events of all grades included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Prexasertib demonstrated durable single agent activity in a subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of clinical characteristics, BRCA status, or prior therapies, including PARPi. There was no obvious correlation with genomic alterations in responders vs non-responders, emphasizing the need for alternative biomarker approaches for responder identification. • Prexasertib, a CHK1 inhibitor, was assessed in platinum resistant or platinum refractory HGSOC patients. • Prexasertib showed durable single agent activity in a subset of patients with recurrent HGSOC. • The most common treatment related adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. • This study suggests the need to explore alternative approaches to identify predictive biomarkers for prexasertib response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Management of heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Outcomes are poor with non-platinum, single-agent chemotherapy (CT); however, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies provide new options. Methods: This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 umbrella trial (NCT03699449) enrolled patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (at least 2 prior lines of CT and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1) to receive combination therapy based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined by archival tumour sample assessment. HRD-positive patients were randomised to either olaparib 200mg bid tablet + cediranib 30mg qd (arm 1) or olaparib 300mg bid tablet + durvalumab 1,500mg q4w (arm 2). HRD-negative patients were allocated to either durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (6 cycles; arm 3, those with PD-L1 expression) or durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 75mg q4w (4 doses) + PLD or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (4 cycles; arm 4, those without PD-L1 expression). Arm 5 (durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 300mg [1 dose] + weekly paclitaxel [60 mg/m² D1,8,15 q4w for 4 cycles] was initiated after arm 4 completed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1). Results: Between Dec 2018 and Oct 2020, 70 patients (median 57 years; median 3 prior treatment lines [range 2-10]) were treated (n=16, 14, 5, 18, and 17, respectively). Overall ORR was 37.1% (26/70, 95% confidence interval=25.9, 49.5); 2 achieved complete response. ORR was 50%, 42.9%, 20%, 33.3%, and 29.4%, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 37.5%, 35.7%, 20%, 66.7%, and 35.3% of patients, respectively. No TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: This study, the first biomarker-driven umbrella trial in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, suggests clinical utility with biomarker-driven targeted therapy. All treatment combinations were manageable, and without unexpected toxicities. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifer: NCT03699449 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

TMEM205 is a novel transmembrane protein associated with platinum resistance (PR) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (OC), however, the specific mechanisms associated with this resistance remain to be elucidated. TMEM205 expression was evaluated in platinum-sensitive (PS) versus platinum resistant (PR) ovarian cancer cell lines and patient serum/tissues. Exosomal efflux of platinum was evaluated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after pre-treatment with small molecule inhibitors (L-2663/L-2797) of TMEM205 prior to treatment with platinum. Cytotoxicity of combination treatment was confirmed in vitro and in an in vivo model. TMEM205 expression was 10–20 fold higher in PR compared to PS ovarian cancer cell lines, serum samples, and tissues. Co-localization with CD1B was confirmed by in-situ proximity ligation assay suggesting that TMEM205 may mediate PR via the exosomal pathway. Exosomal secretion was significantly increased 5–10 fold in PR cell lines after treatment with carboplatin compared to PS cell lines. Pre-treatment with L-2663 prior to carboplatin resulted in significantly increased intracellular concentration of fluorescently-labeled cisplatin and decreased exosomal efflux of platinum. Decreased cell survival and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo was observed when PR cells were treated with a combination of L-2663 with carboplatin compared to carboplatin alone. TMEM205 appears to be involved in the development of PR in ovarian cancer through the exosomal efflux of platinum agents. This study provides pre-clinical evidence that TMEM205 could serve as a possible biomarker for PR as well as a therapeutic target in combination with platinum agents. • TMEM205 and CD1B membrane proteins are highly elevated in OC tissues. • TMEM205 mediated exosome secretion associated with platinum resistance in OC. • L-2663 could effectively suppress platinum resistance in OC by inhibiting TMEM205. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last decade, a growing attention has been focused on identifying effective therapeutic strategies also in the orphan clinical setting of women with platinum-resistant disease. In this context, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) remains a potential approach only in women with platinum sensitive relapse, but experimental data have been published supporting the role of SCS also in patients with platinum-resistant recurrence. In particular, surgery is emerging as a potential option in specific subgroups of women, such as those patients with low-grade serous histology, or low-volume relapse with disease located in the so-called pharmacological sanctuaries. Furthermore, contrasting evidences have suggested a potential role in this clinical setting of SCS combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. In this complex scenario we review here the available evidences regarding the role surgery in ovarian cancer patients with platinum resistant disease, trying also to understand which patients may benefit from this challenging, experimental approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platinum is the backbone of systemic treatment in ovarian cancer and development of platinum resistance is associated with poor survival. Here, we perform a comprehensive review of the literature regarding resistance mechanisms and advances in therapy for platinum resistant ovarian cancer, with a focus on high-grade serous carcinoma. Platinum resistance can be intrinsic or acquired. Resistance mechanisms are complex and diverse. Intracellular mechanisms include restoration of homologous recombination repair, reduced intracellular accumulation of platinum, blocked cellular replication and inhibition of apoptosis. These act in concert with immunosuppressive, angiogenic and stromal changes in the tumour microenvironment to drive treatment resistance. Current molecular stratification lacks prognostic and predictive validity, limited in part by the extreme genomic complexity of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Clinical trials represent an important option for patients as standard of care treatment options have limited efficacy. The most promising trials appear to focus on rational combinations of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenics, PARP inhibitors, targeted therapy and/or antibody-drug conjugates. Resistance mechanisms are multifactorial with capacity to evolve over time, making clinical detection challenging. It is increasingly apparent that clinical trials must incorporate correlative studies to elucidate predictive biomarkers. They must also adopt endpoints that can appropriately measure benefit for palliative treatments. Future research must aim to deepen our understanding of the biology of this disease, and deliver meaningful benefit in terms of improved quality of life and overall survival for women with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pembrolizumab among patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with PROC and treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. All patients were PD-L1 positive. Fixed does of pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results: In total, 8 patients were included in this study. Median number of pembrolizumab cycles was 3 (range, 1-45). The objective response rate was 37.5%, with one complete response and 2 partial responses. The treatment was generally well tolerated. None of the patients experienced treatment discontinuation or treatment-related death due to adverse events. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed modest antitumor activity against PROC. Pembrolizumab monotherapy is an alternative treatment option for patients with PROC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Report the results from a preplanned interim analysis of a phase III, double blind, randomized controlled study of ofranergene obadenovec (VB-111), a targeted anti-cancer gene therapy, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). The OVAL (NCT03398655) study is an on-going study where patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with VB-111 or placebo. The protocol specifies a pre-planned unblinded futility interim analysis of CA-125 response per GCIG criteria in the first 60 evaluable patients. The futility rule determined for this analysis was that the response rate of VB-111 must be greater than the response rate of placebo by at least 10% in order to continue the study. Coincident with the interim analysis, the blinded CA-125 response rate was estimated as a proportion of the first 60 evaluable patients with CA-125 response per GCIG criteria. Post-treatment fever is provided as a possible surrogate marker of VB-111 therapy activity. The median age of the evaluable patients was 62 years (range 41–82); 97% had high-grade serous cancer; 58% had been treated with 3 or more previous lines of therapy, 70% received prior anti-angiogenic treatment, 43% received prior PARP inhibitors. CA-125 response in the VB-111 and weekly paclitaxel treated arm met the pre-specified interim criterion of an absolute advantage of 10% or higher compared to the control. Blinded results show a 53% CA-125 response rate (32/60) with 15% complete response (n=9). Assuming balanced randomization and an absolute advantage of 10% or higher to the VB-111 arm, it may be deducted that the response in the VB-111 treatment arm is 58% or higher. Among patients with post-treatment fever, the CA-125 response rate was 69%. At the time of the interim analysis, response rate findings are comparable to the responses seen in a similar patient population in the phase I/II study. The independent data and safety monitoring committee (iDSMC) recommended continuing the OVAL trial as planned. No new safety signals were identified. • OVAL is a Phase III trial using paclitaxel and VB-111 in recurrent ovarian cancer • VB-111 has a dual mechanism targeting tumor vasculature and anti-tumor immunity • CA-125 response in the VB-111 treated arm met the pre-specified interim criterion • Assuming balanced randomization, the response in the VB-111 arm was at least 58% • The OVAL study has been recommended to continue enrollment as planned [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe our single-institution oncologic outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We compared clinicopathologic information and outcomes for all patients with advanced stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received NACT and IDS with (N = 20) or without (N = 48) HIPEC at our institution from 2010 to 2019 Mean age (62 years with HIPEC and 60 years without HIPEC) and proportion of stage 4 disease (40% for both) did not differ between cohorts. HIPEC patients had higher rates of complete cytoreduction (95% vs 50%), longer mean duration of surgery (530 vs. 216 min), more grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications (65% vs. 4%), and longer mean length of hospital stay (8 vs. 5 days). HIPEC patients had significantly higher risk for platinum-refractory progression or platinum-resistance recurrence (50% vs 23%; RR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.11, 4.30, p = 0.024). Median progression free survival (11.5 vs. 12 months) and all-cause mortality (19.1 vs. 30.5 months) in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC cohorts, respectively, did not differ HIPEC was associated with increased risk for platinum refractory or resistant disease. Higher surgical complexity may contribute to higher complication rates without improving oncologic outcomes in our patients. Further investigations and long-term follow-up are needed to assess the utility of HIPEC in primary treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer • HIPEC is associated with the development of platinum-refractory or -resistant ovarian cancer. • Longer surgical duration when utilizing HIPEC leads to higher complication rates. • Improved selection is needed to identify patients with ovarian cancer who will benefit from HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Olaratumab is a platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα)-targeting monoclonal antibody blocking PDGFRα signaling. PDGFRα expression is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and poor ovarian cancer outcomes. This randomized, open label phase II study evaluated olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin compared with liposomal doxorubicin alone in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Methods Patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2, intravenous infusion) administered every 4 weeks with or without olaratumab (20 mg/kg, IV infusion) every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified based on prior response to platinum therapy (refractory vs resistant). The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Results A total of 123 patients were treated (62 olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin; 61 liposomal doxorubicin). Median PFS was 4.2 months for olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and 4.0 months for liposomal doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 1.043; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.698–1.558; p = 0.837). Median OS was 16.6 months and 16.2 months in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin arms, respectively (HR = 1.098; 95% CI 0.71–1.71). In the platinum-refractory subgroup, median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.6–9.2) and 3.7 months (95% CI 1.9–9.2) in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin (n = 15) and liposomal doxorubicin arms (n = 16), respectively (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.38–1.91). Overall, 59.7% (olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin) and 65.6% (liposomal doxorubicin) of patients reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events regardless of causality. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) regardless of causality were fatigue related (61%), nausea (57%), and constipation (52%) with olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and nausea (64%), fatigue related (62%), and mucositis (46%) with liposomal doxorubicin. Conclusions The addition of olaratumab to liposomal doxorubicin did not result in significant prolongation of PFS or OS in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00913835; registered June 2, 2009.

We sought to evaluate the role of intrinsic chromosomal aberrations in determining favorable outcome to weekly paclitaxel (WP) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We evaluated the common genomic aberrations of two patients with EOC and exceptional WP response in the GENIUS study (NCT03740503). We then searched for potential markers of unusual outcomes to WP in a validation cohort. We performed shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) in the tumor tissue of women with EOC considered as short-responders (SR; progression with ≤3 cycles) and long-responders (LR; response at ≥8 cycles) to WP monotherapy. We identified two women with exceptional response to WP, lasting over four years, who shared chromosome 8 gain as a common genomic aberration. In order to validate our findings, we reviewed 188 patients with EOC treated with WP and selected 61 women (39 SR, 22 LR) with unusual responses. By sWGS, there was no differential alterations in the copy number changes in chromosome 8, or in genes related to angiogenesis, tubulin superfamily, cell-cycle, apoptosis and paclitaxel metabolism or transportation pathways. Amongst the LR group, we identified six exceptionally long responders (ExLR), with responses lasting over a year. In an exploratory analysis, there was increased amplification of angiogenesis (VEGFB , MMP9), tubulin superfamily (TSC2) and apoptosis related genes (BCL2L1, BAD) in ExLR compared to SR. We identified one patient with a complete response to WP for over 7 years. Molecular profiling identified unique amplifications in interleukin related genes (CXCR1, CXCR2, IL1A, IL1B), not detected in other patients. Intrinsic tumor pathways may impact outcome with weekly paclitaxel monotherapy and further investigations are required. • The biomarkers of response to weekly paclitaxel (WP) in epithelial ovarian cancer have not been established. • We detected no changes in chromosomal aberrations in long-responders of WP compared to short-responders. • Patients with response to WP for over a year, exhibited higher amplification in some angiogenesis genes than short-responders. • Amplification in interleukin genes, not seen in other patients, were detected in a patient with complete response to WP. • Intrinsic tumor pathways in archival tissue may impact outcome with WP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) experience poor outcome. Currently, no clearly superior management strategy exists for platinum-resistant EOC patients. Purpose: Analyze the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine–oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in platinum resistant EOC patients. Patients and methods: Thirty-two patients with platinum-based resistant EOC were included. Studied patients had received GEM at the dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and OX 100 mg/m2 on day 1, administered over 2 h 30 min after GEM infusion of 3 week treatment cycle. Results: In the evaluation of tumor response, none of patients had achieved CR while PR, SD, were observed in 7 (21.9%), 9 (28.1%) respectively, clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD) was recorded in 50% of patients while PD was observed in 16 (50%) patients. In regard to survival, the median value of OS was 10.5 months (range, 2.2–17.5 months). The median value of PFS was 6.37 months (range, 1–17.5 months). The one-year OS rate was 34.4% and the one-year PFS rate was 12.5%. Concerning hematological toxicity grade 3 neutropenia was recorded in 4 (12.5%) patients while grade 4 febrile neutropenia was recorded in 2 (6.3%) patients and grade 4 anemia was represented by 3.1%. Grade 1–2 fatigue was the most common non-hematological toxicity and represented by 65.6% of patients. Grade 3 non hematological toxicity was recorded with nausea/vomiting and hepatic toxicity represented by 3.1% for both. Conclusion: The GEMOX combination is a regimen with a moderate therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxic side effects in patients with platinum-resistant EOC.

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor 5-year survival. The first-line standard-of-care for ES-SCLC is platinum plus etoposide, along with 1 of the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab or durvalumab. Although SCLC first-line therapy often leads to rapid responses, treatment becomes more challenging at progression, particularly for those with a chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI) of ≤6 months. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ® ) for SCLC no longer specify treatment recommendations in this setting, but options approved by the US Food and Drug Administration include topotecan and lurbinectedin. Participation in a clinical trial is recommended as an option regardless of CTFI. Other NCCN-recommended regimens are paclitaxel, irinotecan, temozolomide, and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine, among others. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are options in those not previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC (CTFI >6 months), preferred treatment per the NCCN Guidelines ® for SCLC is retreatment with platinum and etoposide, although the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is discouraged if there is progression on a drug in this class. Further research on immunotherapies and combination regimens is ongoing, and continuing work on the subcharacterization of SCLC may lead to better precision of therapies that promote more durable responses in individual patients with ES-SCLC., Competing Interests: JSa is a consultant or advisory board member for Arcus, AstraZeneca, Curadev, Daiichi Sankyo, Guardant Health, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, PharmaMar, and Sanofi. JSu is an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; and has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, G1 Therapeutics, Janssen, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 Sands and Subramanian.)

Purpose: Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Symptom Benefit Study (GCIG-SBS) Stage 2 aimed to review, revise, and validate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns (MOST), developed in GCIG-SBS Stage 1 (MOSTv1, 35 items), and document recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) symptom burden and benefit.Methods: GCIG-SBS Stage 2 recruited patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ROC (PRR-ROC) or potentially platinum-sensitive ROC with ≥ 3 lines of prior chemotherapy (PPS-ROC ≥ 3). Patients completed MOSTv1, QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and FACT-O/FOSI at baseline and before cycle 3 of chemotherapy (pre-C3), and global assessments of change (MOST-Change) pre-C3. Clinicians rated patients' cancer-related symptoms, performance status, and adverse events. Convergent and divergent validity (Spearman's correlations), discriminative validity (effect sizes between groups classified by clinician-rated characteristics), and responsiveness (paired t tests in patients expected to experience clinically meaningful change) were assessed.Results: Of 948 recruits, 903 completed PROMs at baseline and 685 pre-C3. Baseline symptom burden was substantial for PRR-ROC and PPS-ROC ≥ 3. MOSTv2 has 24 items and five multi-item scales: abdominal symptoms (MOST-Abdo), disease or treatment-related symptoms (MOST-DorT), chemotherapy-related symptoms (MOST-Chemo), psychological symptoms (MOST-Psych), and MOST-Well-being. Correlations confirmed concurrent and divergent validity. Discriminative validity was confirmed by effect sizes that conformed with a priori hypotheses. MOST-Abdo was responsive to improvements in abdominal symptoms and MOST-Chemo detected the adverse effects of chemotherapy.Conclusions: The MOSTv2 validly quantifies patient-reported symptom burden, adverse effects, and symptom benefit in ROC, and as such is fit-for-purpose for clinical trials of palliative chemotherapy in ROC. Further research is required to assess test-retest reliability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Aberrantly activated FOXM1 (forkhead box protein M1) leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation and dysregulation of FOXM1 transcription network occurs in 84% of ovarian cancer cases. It was demonstrated that thiostrepton, a thiazole antibiotic, decreases FOXM1 expression. We aimed to determine if targeting the FOXM1 pathway with thiostrepton could improve the efficacy of paclitaxel and cisplatin in human ovarian cancer ascites cells ex vivo. Methods: Human ovarian cancer cell lines and patients' ascites cells were treated with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and thiostrepton or a combination for 48 hours, and cytotoxicity was assessed. Drug combination effects were determined by calculating the combination index values using the Chou and Talalay method. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed to determine changes in FOXM1 expression and its downstream targets. Results: Ovarian cancer cell lines and the patients' ascites cancer cells had an overexpression of FOXM1 expression levels. Targeting FOXM1 with thiostrepton decreased FOXM1 mRNA expression and its downstream targets such as CCNB1 and CDC25B, leading to cell death in both cell lines and patients' ascites cancer cells. Furthermore, addition of thiostrepton to paclitaxel and cisplatin showed synergistic effects in chemoresistant ovarian cancer patients' ascites cells ex vivo. Conclusion: Targeting FOXM1 may lead to novel therapeutics for chemoresistant epithelial ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the current study was to explore the carboplatin‑induced sequential changes in gene expression and screen out key genes, which were associated with effects of carboplatin on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The microarray dataset GSE13525 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, including 6 EOC cell samples separately treated with carboplatin at 24, 30 and 36 h (case group), and 6 samples treated with phosphate‑buffered saline at the same time points (control group). A total of 3 sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were respectively identified in case samples at 24, 30 and 36 h compared with the control group via the Limma package, and separately recorded as DEG‑24, DEG‑30 and DEG‑36. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the overlapped DEGs were performed via the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. The protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed and analyzed by Cytoscape software. In addition, the survival curves were drawn to illustrate the association between the expression levels of certain critical genes and the prognosis of EOC. A total of 170, 605 and 1043 DEGs were separately obtained in DEG‑24 DEG‑30 and DEG‑36, and 110 overlaps were identified. The overlaps were enriched in 77 GO terms and 3 KEGG pathways. A total of 152 pairs were involved in the PPI network, and the abnormal expression levels (high or low) of c‑Jun and cyclin B1 (CCNB1) would reduce the survival time of patients with EOC. The study indicated that c‑Jun and CCNB1 may be the prognostic biomarkers of EOC treated with carboplatin, and certain pathways (such as p53 signaling pathway, cell cycle and mitogen‑activation protein kinase signaling pathway) may be involved in carboplatin‑resistant EOC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: PM01183 is a new compound that blocks active transcription, produces DNA breaks and apoptosis, and affects the inflammatory microenvironment. PM01183 showed strong antitumor activity in preclinical models of cisplatin-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients and methods: Patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer were included in a two-stage, controlled, randomized (in a second stage),multicenter, phase II study. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST and/or GCIG criteria. The exploratory first stage (n=22) confirmed the activity of PM01183 as a single agent at 7.0mg flat dose every 3weeks (q3wk). The second stage (n=59) was randomized and controlled with topotecan on days 1-5 q3wk or weekly (every 4weeks, q4wk). Results: ORR was 23% (95% CI, 13%-37%) for 52 PM01183-treated patients. Median duration of response was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-6.9 months), and 23% (95% CI, 0%-51%) of responses lasted 6 months or more. Ten of the 12 confirmed responses were reported for 33 patients with platinum-resistant disease [ORR=30% (95% CI, 16%-49%)]; for the 29 patients treated with topotecan in the second stage, no responses were found. Median PFS for all PM01183-treated patients was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.6 months), and 5.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.9 months) for patients with platinum-resistant disease. Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 85% of patients; febrile neutropenia in 21% and fatigue (grade 3 in 35%) were the principal safety findings for PM01183. Conclusion: PM01183 is an active drug in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer and warrants further development. The highest activity was observed in platinum-resistant disease. Its safety profile indicates the dose should be adjusted to body surface area (mg/m2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian cancer, which ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women, is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common histologic type, with the 5-year survival for all stages estimated at 45.6%. This rate increases to more than 70% in the minority of patients who are diagnosed at an early stage, but declines to 35% in the vast majority of patients diagnosed at advanced stage. Recurrent EOC is incurable. Platinum sensitivity (or lack thereof) is a major determinant of prognosis. The current standard treatment is primary surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. In recurrent platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory EOC, sequential single-agent salvage chemotherapy is superior to multiagent chemotherapy. Multiagent regimens increase toxicity without clear benefit; however, no preferred sequence of single agents is recommended. The impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapies on progression-free survival and overall survival, which remains dismal, is under active investigation. Currently, clinical trials offer the best hope for the development of a new treatment paradigm in this recalcitrant disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: We review current management strategies for patients with relapsed and refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs), defined as relapsed or persistent disease following at least one line of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Additionally, we discuss future directions in the management of these patients. Recent Findings: Recent studies involving targeted therapies have been disappointing. Nevertheless, studies of the management of refractory germ cell cancer are ongoing, with a focus on optimal utilization of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, as well as the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in refractory germ cell tumors. Studies aiming to identify those patients who may benefit from more intensive treatment up front to prevent the development of refractory disease are also in progress. Summary: Testicular germ cell tumors are among the most curable of all solid tumor malignancies, with cure being possible even in the refractory, metastatic setting. Treatment of refractory disease remains a challenging clinical scenario, but potentially practice changing studies are ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The AURELIA trial demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with bevacizumab added to chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). Methods Patients with PROC were randomised to receive investigator-selected single-agent chemotherapy alone or with bevacizumab. Post-hoc exploratory analyses assessed efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes according to age < 65 versus ≥ 65 years. Results In the 133 patients (37%) aged ≥ 65 years, baseline hypertension was more frequent and ascites was less common than in patients < 65 years. The magnitude of PFS benefit from bevacizumab was similar in patients ≥ 65 versus < 65 years (hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI, 0.31–0.64] versus 0.49 [95% CI, 0.37–0.64], respectively, treatment–age interaction p = 0.58), with similar improvements in response rates. Grade ≥ 3 hypertension was more common with bevacizumab than chemotherapy alone in both subgroups, and more common in older than younger patients irrespective of treatment. However, there was no excess of other adverse events of specific interest for bevacizumab, including venous thromboembolic events, in older patients. More patients receiving bevacizumab in the younger but not the older subgroup showed improved gastrointestinal/abdominal symptoms. Conclusion In exploratory analyses, PFS and response rate improvement with bevacizumab were consistent in older and younger patients. Grade ≥ 3 hypertension was more common in elderly bevacizumab-treated patients; careful monitoring is recommended. Overall, bevacizumab-containing therapy was well tolerated in a selected population aged ≥ 65 years, suggesting a favourable benefit:risk profile. However, geriatric assessments are needed to improve selection of elderly patients potentially gaining symptom and quality of life improvements from bevacizumab-containing therapy. Clinical trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00976911 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]