Search

Background: The contemporary management and resectability of locally advanced lung cancer are undergoing significant changes as new data emerge regarding immunotherapy and targeted treatments. The objective of this document is to review the literature and present consensus among a group of multidisciplinary experts to guide the determination of resectability and management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of contemporary evidence., Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeon Workforce on Thoracic Surgery assembled a multidisciplinary expert panel composed of thoracic surgeons and medical and radiation oncologists with established expertise in the management of lung cancer. A focused literature review was performed, and expert consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi process to address 3 major themes: (1) assessing resectability and multidisciplinary management of locally advanced lung cancer, (2) neoadjuvant (including perioperative) therapy, and (3) adjuvant therapy., Results: A consensus was reached on 19 recommendations. These consensus statements reflect updated insights on resectability and multidisciplinary management of locally advanced lung cancer based on the latest literature and current clinical experience, mainly focusing on the appropriateness of surgical therapy and emerging data regarding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies., Conclusions: Despite the complex decision-making process in managing locally advanced lung cancer, this expert panel agreed on several key recommendations. This document provides guidance for thoracic surgeons and other medical professionals in the optimal management of locally advanced lung cancer based on the most updated evidence and literature., Competing Interests: Disclosures Samuel S. Kim reports a relationship with Intuitive Surgical Inc that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. David T. Cooke reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb Co that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Biniam Kidane reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with Merck & Co Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with Roche that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; and with Olympus Corporation that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Samuel S. Kim reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory. Luis Tapia Vargas reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory. Jyoti Patel reports a relationship with AbbVie Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory; with Bristol-Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory; with Gilead Sciences Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with Guardant Health Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with Sanofi that includes: consulting or advisory; with Tempus that includes: consulting or advisory; with AnHeart Therapeutics that includes: consulting or advisory; with Blueprint Genetics that includes: consulting or advisory; and with Black Diamond Therapeutics that includes: consulting or advisory. Joel Neal reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory; with Genetec Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with Exelixis Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd that includes: consulting or advisory; with Eli Lilly and Company that includes: consulting or advisory; with Amgen Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; with Sanofi that includes: consulting or advisory; and with Bristol-Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory. Joseph Shrager reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes: consulting or advisory and with Becton Dickinson and Company that includes: consulting or advisory. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a series of measures designed to promote early recovery after surgery. Application of this approach has led to significantly decreased morbi-mortality and reduced length of hospital stay. The aim of our study was to determine whether non-completion of the ERAS protocol following robotic-assisted mini-invasive lobectomy could be the cause of prolonged hospital stay (exceeding 6 days). We conducted a longitudinal retrospective analysis of 34 patients (17 men and 17 women) having undergone robotic-assisted lobectomy for early-stage primary lung carcinoma from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The study population was divided into two groups based on length of hospital stay: group 1 with length of stay not exceeding 6 days and group 2 with a stay of 7 days or more. Comparative analysis showed no significant difference in ERAS completion score between the two groups, whatever the preoperative (P=0.15), perioperative (P=0.73) or postoperative (P=0.97) time. That said, prolonged air leak (P=0.01) was the main difference among the analyzed variables, followed by Charlson score (P=0.01), grade of complications (P=0.03) and smoking status (P=0.01). Incorporation of complementary measures in our ERAS protocol strategy would in all probability optimize air leak management and further reduce length of hospital stay., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objective: In 2022, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer issued standard 5.8 quality metric for curative lung cancer resections requiring nodal resection from 3 N2 stations. In this report, we compare oncologic outcomes after resection of 3 N2 stations versus 2 N2 stations in stage I non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: A retrospective review from a single institution database was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of lung cancer, carcinoid tumors, and ground-glass lesions less than 50% solid component were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and nodal upstaging., Results: A total of 581 patients were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the number of N2 stations examined: Group A had 2 N2 stations examined (364 patients), and group B had 3 or more N2 stations examined (217 patients). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. In group A, N1 and N2 positive nodal stations were present in 8.2% (30/364) and 5.2% (19/364) of patients versus 7.4% (16/217) and 5.5% (12/217), respectively, in group B. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 89% and 74% in group A versus 88% and 78% in group B, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 56 patients (15.4%) in group A (6.6% local and 8.8% distant) and 29 patients (13.4%) in group B (5.1% local and 8.3% distant; P = .73)., Conclusions: There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer resections that included 2 N2 stations compared with at least 3 N2 stations examined., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement N.A. received grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Jansen Pharmaceuticals, the National Cancer Institute, New York Genome Center P1000, and the U.S. Department of Defense; and received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Regeneron. J.L.P. has leadership and ownership interest in Angiocrine Bioscience, TMRW, and Viewpoint Medical. J.V.-V. received research grants from Kadmon Pharmaceuticals and Stony Wold-Herbert Fund. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: CALGB140503/JCOG0802 RCTs comparing lobectomy with sublobar resection in stage IA NSCLC have confirmed the non-inferiority of segmentectomy. Additional insight is needed to improve preoperative work-up and intraoperative strategies to increase safety and promote the dissemination of minimally invasive segmentectomy (MIS). A Delphi panel study assessed the level of consensus among surgeons for the planning and management of MIS., Methods: Twenty-one expert lung surgeons represented academic institutions, major teaching hospitals, and community hospitals from Europe, North America, and Asia. A 3-round Delphi methodology was used to analyse the answers of each panellist. Recognizing that questions with fewer response options have a higher consensus probability due to limited variability, weighted consensus thresholds were modified based on the number of response options., Results: The 21 panellists responded to all 3 rounds of questions. Based on the most robust consensus (94.4%), 3D chest CT reconstructions are recommended only when planning complex segmentectomies. Surgeons should perform 3D reconstructions chest CT scans (consensus = 83.3%). The most effective and safest technique is image-guided VATS in a hybrid operating room (consensus = 83.3%). Dyes with intravenous administration are the safest technique for identifying the intersegmental plane during MIS (consensus = 72.2%). Augmented/mixed reality will probably not immediately help reduce perioperative complications (consensus = 72.2%)., Conclusions: This Delphi consensus supports 3D reconstructions and preoperative pulmonary nodule localization before complex MIS. These recommendations should be considered when allocating resources to improve MIS's safety and oncologic efficacy for patients with small, early-stage lung cancers., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Lung cancers that present as radiographic subsolid nodules represent a subtype with distinct biological behavior and outcomes. The objective of this document is to review the existing literature and report consensus among a group of multidisciplinary experts, providing specific recommendations for the clinical management of subsolid nodules., Methods: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Clinical Practice Standards Committee assembled an international, multidisciplinary expert panel composed of radiologists, pulmonologists, and thoracic surgeons with established expertise in the management of subsolid nodules. A focused literature review was performed with the assistance of a medical librarian. Expert consensus statements were developed with class of recommendation and level of evidence for each of 4 main topics: (1) definitions of subsolid nodules (radiology and pathology), (2) surveillance and diagnosis, (3) surgical interventions, and (4) management of multiple subsolid nodules. Using a modified Delphi method, the statements were evaluated and refined by the entire panel., Results: Consensus was reached on 17 recommendations. These consensus statements reflect updated insights on subsolid nodule management based on the latest literature and current clinical experience, focusing on the correlation between radiologic findings and pathological classifications, individualized subsolid nodule surveillance and surgical strategies, and multimodality therapies for multiple subsolid lung nodules., Conclusions: Despite the complex nature of the decision-making process in the management of subsolid nodules, consensus on several key recommendations was achieved by this American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert panel. These recommendations, based on evidence and a modified Delphi method, provide guidance for thoracic surgeons and other medical professionals who care for patients with subsolid nodules., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement A full list of author’s disclosures is provided in Appendix E1. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Pulmonary resection, in addition to perioperative systemic therapies, is a cornerstone of treatment for operable patients with early-stage and locoregional disease. In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on surgical quality metrics: specific and evidence-based structural, process, and outcome measures that aim to decrease variation in lung cancer care and improve long term outcomes. These metrics can be divided into potential areas of intervention or improvement in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care and form the basis of guidelines issued by organizations including the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This review focuses on established quality metrics associated with lung cancer surgery with an emphasis on the most recent research and guidelines., Recent Findings: Over the past 18 months, quality metrics across the peri-operative care period were explored, including optimal invasive mediastinal staging preoperatively, the extent of intraoperative lymphadenectomy, surgical approaches related to minimally invasive resection, and enhanced recovery pathways that facilitate early discharge following pulmonary resection., Summary: Quality metrics in lung cancer surgery is an exciting and important area of research. Adherence to quality metrics has been shown to improve overall survival and guidelines supporting their use allows targeted quality improvement efforts at a local level to facilitate more consistent, less variable oncologic outcomes across centers., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous literature in other surgical disciplines regarding the impact of resident and fellow involvement on operative time and outcomes has yielded mixed results. The impact of trainee involvement on minimally invasive thoracic surgery is unknown. This study compared risk-adjusted differences in operative time and outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer between cases performed with and without residents and fellows involved., Methods: All patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer between 2008 and 2018 were identified in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: cases with residents and fellows involved, and cases performed only by attending surgeons. Primary outcomes included operative time, postoperative hospital length of stay, and composite 30-day morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with high and low trainee operative autonomy., Results: A total of 3678 patients met study inclusion criteria. In all, 1780 cases were performed with residents and fellows involved (median postgraduate year, 5; interquartile range, 4-7). Multivariate analysis showed that operative time was significantly shorter in resident- and fellow-involved cases compared with attending-only cases (mean [SD], 3.6 [1.4] versus 3.8 [1.6] hours; P < .001). There were no significant differences in composite 30-day morbidity and mortality (16.0% versus 17.1%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.11; P = .40) or length of stay. Substratification of trainees by postgraduate year resulted in similar findings. Cases performed in July through October and those in the Northeastern United States were associated with low autonomy., Conclusions: Current training paradigms in thoracic surgery are safe, and the involvement of motivated and skilled trainees with appropriate supervision may benefit operative duration., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surgical resection is a principal treatment modality in the early stages of non-small cell lung cancer. The risks of surgical procedures are decreasing due to advancements in surgical techniques. However, optimal treatment strategy in locally advanced stages is unclear. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be a future treatment alternative.

Surgery is the best treatment for early lung cancer but requires a preoperative functional evaluation to identify patients who may be at a high risk of complications or death. Guideline algorithms include a cardiological evaluation, a cardiopulmonary assessment to calculate the predicted residual lung function, and identify patients needing exercise testing to complete the evaluation. According to most expert opinion, exercise tests have a very high predictive value of complications. However, since the publication of these guidelines, minimally-invasive surgery, sublobar resections, prehabilitation and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have been developed. Implementation of these techniques and programs is associated with a decrease in postoperative mortality and complications. In addition, the current guidelines and the cut-off values they identified are based on early series of patients, and are designed to select patients before major lung resection (lobectomy-pneumonectomy) performed by thoracotomy. Therefore, after a review of the current guidelines and a brief update on prehabilitation (smoking cessation, exercise training and nutritional aspects), we will discuss the need to redefine functional criteria to select patients who will benefit from lung surgery., (Copyright © 2020 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) has developed composite quality measures for lobectomy and esophagectomy. This study sought to develop a composite measure including all resections for lung cancer., Methods: The STS lung cancer composite score is based on 2 outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. GTSD data were included from January 2015 to December 2017. "Star ratings" were created for centers with 30 or more cases by using 95% Bayesian credible intervals. The Bayesian model was performed with and without inclusion of the minimally invasive approach to assess the impact of approach on the composite measure., Results: The study population included 38,461 patients from 256 centers. Overall operative mortality was 1.3% (495 of 38,461). The major complication rate was 7.9% (3045 of 38,461). The median number of nodes examined was 10 (interquartile range, 5 to 16); the median number of nodal stations sampled was 4 (interquartile range, 3 to 5). Positive resection margins were identified in 3.7% (1420 of 38,461). A total of 214 centers with 30 or more cases were assigned star ratings. There were 7 1-star, 194 2-star, and 13 3-star programs; 70.6% of resections were performed through a minimally invasive approach. Inclusion of minimally invasive approach, which was adjusted for in previous models, altered the star ratings for 3% (6 of 214) of the programs., Conclusions: Participants in the STS GTSD perform lung cancer resection with low morbidity and mortality. Lymph node data suggest that participants are meeting contemporary staging standards. There is wide variability among participants in application of minimally invasive approaches. The study found that risk adjustment for approach altered ratings in 3% of participants., (Copyright © 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this project was to assess the best measure for postoperative outcomes by comparing 30-day and 90-day mortality rates after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer using the National Cancer Database. Secondarily, hospital performance was examined at multiple postoperative intervals to assess changes in ranking based on mortality up to 1 year after surgery., Methods: Patients who had undergone surgery for non-small cell lung cancer between 2004 and 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Mortality rates at 30 days and 90 days were compared after adjusting for several patient characteristics, tumor variables, and hospital procedural volume using generalized logistic mixed models. Subsequently, mixed model logistic regression models were employed to evaluate hospital performance based on calculated mortality at prespecified time points., Results: A total of 303,579 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were included for analysis. The 90-day mortality was almost double the 30-day mortality (3.0% vs 5.7%). Several patient characteristics, tumor features, and hospital volume were significantly associated with mortality at both 30 days and 90 days. Hospital rankings fluctuate appreciably between early mortality time points, which is additional evidence that quality metrics need to be based on later mortality time points., Conclusions: Thirty-day mortality is the commonly accepted quality measure for thoracic surgeons; however, hospital rankings may be inaccurate if based on this variable alone. Mortality after 90 days appears to be a threshold after which there is less variability in hospital ranking and should be considered as an alternative quality metric in lung cancer surgery., (Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In this study we present historic data on adherence to and survival outcomes associated with recently introduced quality measures for the management of non-small-cell lung cancer., Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer from 1998 to 2011. Adherence to guidelines was assessed for each of 3 Commission on Cancer-defined quality measures: (1) sampling 10 regional lymph nodes at surgery; (2a) surgery within 120 days of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or, (2b) 180 days of adjuvant chemotherapy; and (3) nonsurgical primary therapy in cN2 disease. The likelihood of measure adherence and the association of measure adherence with all-cause mortality were analyzed controlling for patient, hospital, and time period characteristics., Results: Regional lymph node sampling was inadequate in 72.7% of cases. Only 28.7% began adjuvant chemotherapy within 180 days of surgery. However, 96.5% of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy proceeded to surgery within 120 days and surgery was first-line treatment for cN2 disease in only 3.7% of patients. Uninsured or Medicaid status was an independent risk factor for a prolonged delay between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.72) and surgery and adjuvant treatment (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.19). Overall survival was significantly better in patients whose care conformed to quality standards for nodal sampling (measure 1), and timing of chemotherapy., Conclusions: Adherence rates for nodal sampling at the time of surgery and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were low. These findings highlight opportunities for improvement efforts, but more measures are needed to more broadly assess the quality of lung cancer care., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Nontechnical skills are important for safe and efficient surgery. Teams performing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy express that it is of utmost importance to have a shared mental model (SMM) of the patient, current situation, and team resources. However, these SMMs have never been explored in a clinical setting. The aim of this observational study was to measure the similarity of SMMs within teams performing VATS lobectomy., Methods: In this national, multicenter study, SMMs of teams performing VATS lobectomy (n = 64) were measured by preoperative and postoperative questionnaires that were completed by all team members (n = 172). Participants' responses were compared within each team to explore SMMs of risk assessment, familiarity, technical skills, nontechnical skills, and problems., Results: Analysis showed poor agreement between team members with respect to risk assessment, but higher levels of agreement were found for assessments of familiarity, technical skills, and nontechnical skills within the team (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), most notably for surgical subteams (ie, surgeon plus assistant surgeon plus surgical nurses). During the surgical procedure, the most frequent problems were related to anesthesia, and these were most often recognized by the surgeons. The operating room nurses were the least aware of each other's and the surgeons' problems., Conclusions: Significant variation exists in the SMMs among VATS team members, with poor agreement regarding the patient and current situation, but better agreement with respect to team resources. Focus on preoperative and perioperative team reflexivity, in addition to explicit communication within unfamiliar teams, may provide opportunities to enhance SMMs, with possible downstream effects on team performance., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Parameters defining attainment and maintenance of proficiency in thoracoscopic video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy remain unknown. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated the institutional performance curve for VATS lobectomy by using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis., Methods: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, the study investigators identified centers that had performed a total of 30 or more VATS lobectomies. Major morbidity, mortality, and blood transfusion were deemed primary outcomes, with expected incidence derived from risk-adjusted regression models. Acceptable and unacceptable failure rates for outcomes were set a priori according to clinical relevance and informed by regression model output., Results: Between 2001 and 2016, 24,196 patients underwent VATS lobectomy at 159 centers with a median volume of 103 (range, 30 to 760). Overall rates of operative mortality, major morbidity, and transfusion were 1% (244 of 24,189), 17.1% (4,145 of 24,196), and 4% (975 of 24,196), respectively. Of the highest-volume centers (≥100 cases), 84% (65 of 77) and 82 % (63 of 77) (p = 0.48) were proficient by major morbidity standards by their 50th and 100th cases, respectively. Similarly, 92% (71 of 77) and 90% (69 of 77) (p = 0.41) of centers showed proficiency by transfusion standards by their 50th and 100th cases, respectively. Three performance patterns were observed: (1) initial and sustained proficiency, (2) crossing unacceptability thresholds with subsequent improved performance; and (3) crossing unacceptability thresholds without subsequent improved performance., Conclusions: VATS lobectomy outcomes have improved with lower mortality and transfusion rates. The majority of high-volume centers demonstrated proficiency after 50 cases; however, maintenance of proficiency is not ensured. Cusum provides a simple yet powerful tool that can trigger internal audits and performance improvement initiatives., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The NCCN Guidelines for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) address all aspects of disease management. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for SCLC regarding immunotherapy, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy. For the 2018 update, new sections were added on "Signs and Symptoms of SCLC" and "Principles of Pathologic Review.", (Copyright © 2018 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)

Background: Specific assessment tools can accelerate trainees' learning through structured feedback and ensure that trainees attain the knowledge and skills required to practice as competent, independent surgeons (competency-based surgical education). The objective was to develop an assessment tool for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy by achieving consensus within an international group of VATS experts., Method: The Delphi method was used as a structured process for collecting and distilling knowledge from a group of internationally recognized VATS experts. Opinions were obtained in an iterative process involving answering repeated rounds of questionnaires. Responses to one round were summarized and integrated into the next round of questionnaires until consensus was reached., Results: Thirty-one VATS experts were included and four Delphi rounds were conducted. The response rate for each round were 68.9% (31/45), 100% (31/31), 96.8% (30/31), and 93.3% (28/30) for the final round where consensus was reached. The first Delphi round contained 44 items and the final VATS lobectomy Assessment Tool (VATSAT) comprised eight items with rating anchors: (1) localization of tumor and other pathological tissue, (2) dissection of the hilum and veins, (3) dissection of the arteries, (4) dissection of the bronchus, (5) dissection of lymph nodes, (6) retrieval of lobe in bag, (7) respect for tissue and structures, and (8) technical skills in general., Conclusion: A novel and dedicated assessment tool for VATS lobectomy was developed based on VATS experts' consensus. The VATSAT can support the learning of VATS lobectomy by providing structured feedback and help supervisors make the important decision of when trainees have acquired VATS lobectomy competencies for independent performance.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be associated with less morbidity than open lobectomy or segmentectomy, but some studies have questioned the benefit of thoracoscopic surgery. This study aimed to determine trends and factors associated with patient's likelihood of undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy and to compare outcomes with each approach. This retrospective study included adult patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2007 to 2015 (n = 14,717). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgeon specialty with thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Propensity score matching was performed to evaluate outcomes for thoracoscopic and open lobectomy or segmentectomy. Use of thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy increased from 11.6% in 2007 to 60.6% in 2015 (P< 0.0001). Older patients, females, and Hispanics were more likely to undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy, whereas morbidly obese patients, patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiology class, and patients with 4-6 frailty conditions had a lower likelihood of receiving thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Thoracic surgeons had 57% (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36-1.81) higher odds of performing thoracoscopic surgery than other surgeons. Thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy reduced risk of 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 1.9%; odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.70) and resulted in shorter length of stay (4 days vs 6 days; Beta coefficient = -0.37, P < 0.0001), and fewer complications. The frequency of thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy has increased substantially over the last 10 years and now accounts for over half of lobectomies. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery showed better outcomes than open lobectomy or segmentectomy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite previous retrospective reports that the number of lymph nodes resected at curative intent surgery for lung cancer correlates with overall survival (OS), no consensus exists regarding the minimal nor optimal number of lymph nodes to resect at curative lung cancer surgery., Methods: We studied subjects in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (SEER) diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer between 2000 and 2011 who underwent either lobectomy or pneumonectomy and had pathologic negative nodal evaluation. We excluded patients with sublobar resection and/or no lymph node evaluation. We examined associations between number of lymph nodes evaluated and OS/lung cancer-specific survival by multivariable Cox regression; and predictors of evaluation of more lymph nodes., Results: Among the 33,463 patients in our sample, a median of 7 lymph nodes were evaluated. We found that lung cancer-specific survival and OS improved with increasing lymph node evaluation up to 16 to 18 lymph nodes (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.85] and 0.78 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.86], respectively). There was little additional improvement in outcomes with evaluation of >16 to 18 lymph nodes. Blacks, Hispanics, females, and patients from distinct geographical regions were less likely to have 16 or more lymph nodes evaluated., Conclusions: There was a consistently increasing survival benefit associated with a more extensive lymph node evaluation at lung cancer resection, up to 16 to 18 lymph nodes removed. The median number of nodes evaluated was, however, only 7, suggesting that setting a goal of ≥16 examined lymph nodes may lead to improved survival outcomes, and reduce disparities in care.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a frequently occurring disease, yet diagnosed at a local stage in only 40% of cases. Lung metastases (LM) appear in 5-15% of patients and, left untreated, carry a very poor prognosis. Some CRC patients may benefit from a potentially curative LM resection, but success and benefit are difficult to predict. We discuss prognostic factors of survival after lung metastasectomy in CRC patients under several scenarios (with/ without prior liver metastases; repetitive pulmonary resections). We reviewed all studies (2005-2015) about pulmonary metastases surgical management with curative intent in CRC patients, with a minimum threshold on the number of patients reported (without prior liver metastases: n ≥ 100; with prior resection of liver metastases: n ≥ 50; repetitive thoracic surgery: n ≥ 30). The picture of the prognostic factors of survival is nuanced: surgical management demonstrates clear successes and steady progress, yet there is no single success criterion; stratification of patients and selection bias impact the conclusions. Surgical management of liver and lung metastases may prolong life or cure CRC patients, provided the lesions are fully resected and patients carefully selected. Repeat lung metastasectomy is a safe approach to treat patients in selected cases. In conclusion, there is no standard for surgical management in CRC patients with pulmonary metastases. Patients with isolated unilateral lung metastasis with normal CEA level and no lymph node involvement benefit the most from surgery. Most series report good results in highly selected patients, but instances of long-term disease-free survival remain exceptional., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several medical systems have adopted minimum volume standards for surgical procedures, including lung and esophageal resection. We sought to determine whether these proposed hospital cutoffs are associated with differences in outcomes., Methods: Analyzing the State Inpatient Databases and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we evaluated all patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who underwent lobectomy/pneumonectomy or esophagectomy for cancer in California, Florida, and New York (2009-2011). Hospitals were defined as low volume for each procedure per proposed minimum volume standards by year: <40 lung resections and <20 esophagectomies. We compared demographic data and determined the incidence of complications and mortality between patients operated on at low- versus high-volume hospitals. Propensity matching (of demographic characteristics, income, payer, and comorbidities) was performed to balance the cohorts for analysis., Results: During the time period, 20,138 patients underwent lobectomy/pneumonectomy of which 12,432 operations (61.7%) were performed at low-volume hospitals (n = 456) and 7706 operations were performed at high-volume hospitals (n = 48). Of 1324 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 1087 operations (82.1%) were performed at low-volume hospitals (n = 184), whereas only 237 operations were at high-volume hospitals (n = 6). After propensity matching (lung 1:1 and esophagus 2:1), no major differences were apparent for in-hospital mortality nor major complications for either lung or esophageal resection. Length of stay was longer in low-volume hospitals after lung resection (median 6 vs 5 days; P < .001), but not after esophageal resection., Discussion: Although several groups have publicly called for minimum volume requirements for surgical procedures, the majority of patients undergo lung and esophageal resection at hospitals below the proposed cutoffs. The proposed standards for lung and esophageal resection are not associated with a difference in outcomes in this large administrative database. Efforts should be made to determine more meaningful minimum volume requirements and to determine whether such standards are appropriate., (Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs in thoracic surgery is relatively recent with limited outcome data. This study aimed to determine the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway on morbidity and length of stay in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer., Methods: This prospective cohort study collected data on consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer between April 2012 and June 2014 at a regional referral center in the United Kingdom. All patients followed a standardized, 15-element Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Key data fields included protocol compliance with individual elements, pathophysiology, and operative factors. Thirty-day morbidity was taken as the primary outcome measure and classified a priori according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Logistic regression models were devised to identify independent risk factors for morbidity and length of stay., Results: A total of 422 consecutive patients underwent lung resection over a 2-year period, of whom 302 (71.6%) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Lobectomy was performed in 297 patients (70.4%). Complications were experienced by 159 patients (37.6%). The median length of stay was 5 days (range, 1-67), and 6 patients (1.4%) died within 30 days of surgery. There was a significant inverse relationship between protocol compliance and morbidity after adjustment for confounding factors (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P < .01). Age, lobectomy or pneumonectomy, more than 1 resection, and delayed mobilization were independent predictors of morbidity. Age, lack of preoperative carbohydrate drinks, planned high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit admission, delayed mobilization, and open approach were independent predictors of delayed discharge (length of stay >5 days)., Conclusions: Increased compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway is associated with improved clinical outcomes after resection for primary lung cancer. Several elements, including early mobilization, appear to be more influential than others., (Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stage IIIA is a very heterogeneous group encompassing locally advanced disease with T3 and T4 tumors without any nodal involvement and very small T1a primary tumors with unilateral mediastinal lymphatic disease. Tailored management defines interdisciplinary management requiring board decisions, which can sometimes be difficult particularly in stage IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lobectomy still is standard of care even for stage I NSCLC, which increasingly is implemented using minimally invasive surgical technique. On the other hand even locally extended tumors are today safely resected with low morbidity and mortality. According to the 2015 guidelines of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons any kind of anatomical lung resection for lung cancer with curative intent has to be accompanied by formal mediastinal lymph node dissection. The transcervical route for complete bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy offers improved completeness of resection without the need for single lung ventilation and ideally supports the concept of minimally invasive surgery.

This report highlights the results of the Italian video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) Group, launched in mid 2013, which now has a website and an established database with over 4000 VATS lobectomy cases recruited from 67 thoracic surgery units across Italy. The year 2016 has been crucial for the following steps: inclusion of a dedicated biostatistician and a 'Survey Analysis & Data Quality Check'; the First Consensus Meeting with statements consequently adopted as Recommendations for the Italian Thoracic Surgery Society and published in a peer-reviewed journal; two papers published under the logo Italian VATS Group and seven abstracts accepted at annual international meetings (European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons, European Lung Cancer Conference and European Respiratory Society); the institution of a Master Course on VATS lobectomy; the partnership with AME Publishing Company.

Background: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection in children is a technically demanding procedure that requires a relatively long learning period. This study aimed to evaluate the serial improvement of quality metrics according to case volume experience in pediatric VATS pulmonary resection of congenital lung malformation (CLM). Methods VATS anatomical resection in CLM was attempted in 200 consecutive patients. The learning curve for the operative time was modeled by cumulative sum analysis. Quality metrics were used to measure technical achievement and efficiency outcomes. Results The median operative time was 95 min. The median length of hospital stay and chest tube indwelling time was 4 and 2 days, respectively. The improvement of operation time was observed persistently until 200 cases. However, two cut-off points, the 50th case and 110th case, were identified in the learning curve for operative time, and the 110th case was the turning point for stable outcomes with short operation time. Significant reduction of length of hospital stay and chest tube indwelling time was observed after 50 cases (p = .002 and p = .021, respectively). The complication rate decreased but continued at a low rate for entire study period and the interval decrease was not statistically significant. Conversion rate decreased significantly (p = .001), and technically challenging procedures were performed more frequently in later cases. Conclusions Improvements of quality metrics in operation time, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, and chest tube indwelling time were observed in proportion to case volume. Minimum experience of 50 is necessary for stable outcomes of pediatric VATS pulmonary resection.

Surgical treatment with lung resection has traditionally been the treatment of choice for pulmonary cavities containing aspergillomas that cause hemoptysis. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic technique that is commonly used for transbronchial needle aspiration of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes as well as centrally located parenchymal lesions. Here, we describe a case of a 71-year-old woman who was found to have a cavitary lesion in the lung containing aspergillomas. Under direct ultrasound visualization with EBUS, liposomal amphotericin B was injected into the aspergillomas. These aspergillomas regressed after treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first reported treatment of aspergilloma with EBUS-guided transbronchial needle injection of liposomal amphotericin B.

Pulmonary morphology, physiology, and respiratory functions change in both physiological and pathological conditions. Internal lung surface area (ISA), representing the gas-exchange capacity of the lung, is a critical criterion to assess respiratory function. However, observer bias can significantly influence measured values for lung morphological parameters. The protocol that we describe here minimizes variations during measurements of two morphological parameters used for ISA calculation: internal lung volume (ILV) and mean linear intercept (MLI). Using ISA as a morphometric and functional parameter to determine the outcome of alveolar regeneration in both pneumonectomy (PNX) and prosthesis implantation mouse models, we found that the increased ISA following PNX treatment was significantly blocked by implantation of a prosthesis into the thoracic cavity 1 . The ability to accurately quantify ISA is not only expected to improve the reliability and reproducibility of lung function studies in injured-induced alveolar regeneration models, but also to promote mechanistic discoveries of multiple pulmonary diseases.

Purpose: To examine the frequency of guideline-concordant cancer care in elderly patients, including "older" elderly (age ≥80 years)., Methods and Materials: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare dataset in patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer (n=55,094), non-small cell lung (NSCLC) (n=36,203), or prostate cancer (n=86,544) from 2006 to 2011, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation (RT) treatments were identified using claims. Pearson χ 2 tested associations between age and guideline concordance., Results: Older patients were less likely to receive guideline-concordant curative treatment: in stage III breast cancer, receipt of postmastectomy RT (70%, 46%, and 21% in patients aged 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years, respectively; P<.0001); in stage I NSCLC, RT or surgery (89%, 80%, and 64% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage III NSCLC, RT or surgery plus chemotherapy (79%, 58%, and 27% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); and in intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer, RT or prostatectomy (projected life expectancy >10 years: 85% and 82% in age 66-69 and 70-75 years; and ≤10 years: 70%, 42%, and 9% in age 76-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001). However, older patients were more likely to receive guideline-concordant de-intensified treatment: in stage I to II node-negative breast cancer, hypofractionated postlumpectomy RT (9%, 16%, and 23% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage I estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, observation after lumpectomy (12%, 42%, and 84% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage I NSCLC, stereotactic body RT instead of surgery (7%, 16%, and 25% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); and in lower-risk prostate cancer, no active treatment (25%, 54%, and 68% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001)., Conclusion: Actual treatment of older elderly cancer patients frequently diverged from guidelines, especially in curative treatment of advanced disease. Results suggest a need for better metrics than existing guidelines alone to evaluate quality and appropriateness of care in this population., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Safety in the operating room is dependent on the team's non-technical skills. The importance of non-technical skills appears to be different for minimally invasive surgery as compared with open surgery. The aim of this study was to identify which non-technical skills are perceived by team members to be most important for patient safety, in the setting of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy., Methods: This was an explorative, semistructured interview-based study with 21 participants from all four thoracic surgery centers in Denmark that perform VATS lobectomy. Data analysis was deductive, and directed content analysis was used to code the text into the Oxford Non-Technical Skills system for evaluating operating teams' non-technical skills., Results: The most important non-technical skills described by the VATS teams were planning and preparation, situation awareness, problem solving, leadership, risk assessment, and teamwork. These non-technical skills enabled the team to achieve shared mental models, which in turn facilitated their efforts to anticipate next steps. This was viewed as important by the participants as they saw VATS lobectomy as a high-risk procedure with complementary and overlapping scopes of practice between surgical and anesthesia subteams., Conclusions: This study identified six non-technical skills that serve as the foundation for shared mental models of the patient, the current situation, and team resources. These findings contribute three important additions to the shared mental model construct: planning and preparation, risk assessment, and leadership. Shared mental models are crucial for patient safety because they enable VATS teams to anticipate problems through adaptive patterns of both implicit and explicit coordination., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) is a voluntary effort that provides participants with risk-adjusted semiannual performance reports that allow comparison of institutional outcomes against national benchmarks. With nearly 1,000 surgeons contributing data from more than 300 centers across North America, the STS GTSD now includes almost a half million cases. In 2016, updated risk models for lung resection and esophagectomy for cancer were reported, and composite quality measures for lobectomy and esophagectomy were developed. Ongoing efforts include upgrading the STS GTSD, establishing public reporting of lobectomy for lung cancer composite scores, creating an on-line dashboard, and strengthening international collaboration with the European Society of Thoracic Surgery Registry. With these initiatives, the STS GTSD aims to continue to improve quality of care and support research endeavors in general thoracic surgery. This article summarizes current aggregate national outcomes in general thoracic surgery and reviews related activities in the areas of quality measurement, performance improvement, and transparency from the STS GTSD during the past 12 months., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Standard operation procedure (SOP) could standardize treatment procedure and reduce medical expenses, but SOP drawn by the government may not suit all medical institutions, so individual adjustment made by surgical team is necessary., Methods: We recorded the information of patients undergoing lung resection, including postoperative hospital stay, medical expenses and ratio of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) rate to evaluate surgical quality sustaining improvement in terms of structure indicator, process indicator and outcome indicator, aiming at exploring the ideal postoperative hospital stay and the best indicators to evaluate surgical quality improvement., Results: The average postoperative hospital stay reduced significantly between 2016 and 2013 [(4.08±1.8) d vs (6.13±3.6) d, P<0.001)]. VATS rate increased from 2013-2016 (17%→48%→68%→73%), as well as single port VATS rate (0%→2%→52%→66%)., Conclusions: Surgical quality surveillance and sustaining improvement by surgical team could further reduce postoperative hospital stay and perioperative complications.

Currently, surgery for lung cancer with curative intent consists of resection (removal) of the proper extent of lung parenchyma that bears the cancer lesion along with locoregional lymph nodes to assess possible cancer metastasis. Lobectomy, at least, is preferred with regard to the extent of parenchymal resection. The history of lung cancer surgery, which started around 1933 as pneumonectomy (resection of the entire lung on either side), can be characterized as an attempt to minimize the extent of parenchymal resection. In the early 1960s, pneumonectomy was replaced by lobectomy, which has long been respected as the standard surgical mode. However, the transition from lobectomy to a lesser resection, such as segmentectomy or wedge resection, was not recommended because of the results of a randomized trial performed by the North American Lung Cancer Study Group in the 1980s. As of now, the extent of parenchymal resection remains lobectomy, and lesser resection is indicated only for patients who have a compromised pulmonary reserve. Very recently, because of the advent of CT screening programs and improvements in imaging technology, fainter and smaller lung cancers are being discovered. For these smaller and earlier lung cancers, there is some uncertainty about whether lobectomy still should be indicated, as it is for larger tumors with a diameter of 3 cm or more. Therefore, several randomized trials are ongoing to compare lobectomy with lesser resections; endpoints are overall survival and postoperative pulmonary function. Until the results of these trials are available, lung cancer should still be removed by lobectomy rather than by limited resection, such as segmentectomy or wedge resection.

3rd Mediterranean Symposium on Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Catania, Italy, 21-22 April 2016 Surgeons presented their experience on videothoracoscopic lobectomy at the 3rd Mediterranean Symposium on Thoracic Surgical Oncology. The audience did not question that lobectomy could be done safely and as completely by videothoracoscopic techniques provided it was in expert and practiced hands and suitable patients. The question addressed here is whether video-assisted thoracic surgery can replace thoracotomy as a standard of care in patients suitable for either approach. To determine which provides the better outcome in terms of long-term survival with equivalent quality of life, would require direct comparison in pragmatic randomized controlled trials.

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been used for many thoracic diseases as an alternate approach to thoracotomy. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of pneumonectomy using VATS with that using thoracotomy pneumonectomy in pigs. Fourteen pigs were equally divided into two groups; one group underwent VATS and the other group underwent transthoracic pneumonectomy. We monitored pre-, intra-, and post-operative physiologic parameters, along with blood cell count, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cortisol. The differences between the two approaches were analyzed., Results: Mean surgical time in the VATS group (160.6 ± 16.2 min) was significantly longer than that in the thoracotomy group (123.7 ± 13.2 min). In both groups, CRP and IL-6 concentrations were significantly increased at postoperative 4 h, and then gradually decreased to preoperative levels. CRP and IL-6 at postoperative day 1 were significant lower in the VATS group compared with the thoracotomy group. SAA was significantly increased at postoperative days 1 and 3 in both groups compared with preoperative levels. Cortisol was significantly increased immediately after surgery in both groups compared with preoperative levels, and was significantly higher in the thoracotomy group than the VATS group at postoperative 4 h and 1 day., Conclusions: There was no difference between the two groups in physiologic parameters and blood cell count. However, the results indicate that VATS resulted in a smaller incision, less acute-phase reaction, less stress and less pain compared with thoracotomy pneumonectomy.

The Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology groups of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have backed the publication of a handbook on recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Due to the high incidence and mortality of this disease, the best scientific evidence must be constantly updated and made available for consultation by healthcare professionals. To draw up these recommendations, we called on a wide-ranging group of experts from the different specialties, who have prepared a comprehensive review, divided into 4 main sections. The first addresses disease prevention and screening, including risk factors, the role of smoking cessation, and screening programs for early diagnosis. The second section analyzes clinical presentation, imaging studies, and surgical risk, including cardiological risk and the evaluation of respiratory function. The third section addresses cytohistological confirmation and staging studies, and scrutinizes the TNM and histological classifications, non-invasive and minimally invasive sampling methods, and surgical techniques for diagnosis and staging. The fourth and final section looks at different therapeutic aspects, such as the role of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, a multidisciplinary approach according to disease stage, and other specifically targeted treatments, concluding with recommendations on the follow-up of lung cancer patients and surgical and endoscopic palliative interventions in advanced stages., (Copyright © 2016 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical guidelines are created to reduce variation in care practices, with the goal of improving patient outcomes. There is currently no international consensus on best practices for pulmonary resection. Our aim was to evaluate variation in treatment patterns and outcomes for pulmonary resection by comparing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS) general thoracic surgery databases (GTSDs)., Methods: An international collaboration was established between the STS and ESTS GTSD task forces. Patients who underwent pulmonary resection between 2010 and 2013 were identified from the 2 databases. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, morbidity, and mortality were compared., Results: There were 78,212 lung resections captured in the STS (n = 47,539) and ESTS databases (n = 30,673). Patients from the STS database were more likely to be of the female sex, have no pathologic N2 disease, have had previous cardiothoracic operations, and have received preoperative thoracic irradiation compared with patients from the ESTS database. In addition, patients from the STS database were more likely to have undergone a thoracoscopic operation and have received a sublobar resection. Although there was an increased risk of reintubation, atrial arrhythmias, and return to the operating room in the STS patients, the mean hospital length of stay was shorter than in patients from the ESTS database, regardless of operation performed. Thirty-day mortality was higher in the STS patients for wedge resection (p < 0.001) but lower for lobectomy (p < 0.001) and pneumonectomy (p < 0.001) compared with the ESTS patients., Conclusions: Differences exists in patient population, procedures performed, and outcomes for pulmonary resections between the STS and ESTS databases, suggesting an opportunity for quality improvement initiatives., (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical quality programs, such as the American College of Surgeons NSQIP, provide reports based on specialty or procedure, with patients aggregated together. It is unknown whether hospital performance differs by patient subgroup (eg cancer vs noncancer patients), masking opportunities for improvement. Our objectives were to determine whether performance differs within a given hospital for 6 contrasting patient subgroups and to identify the percentage of hospitals with greater than chance differences in performance., Study Design: Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP data, adults undergoing lung resection, esophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, colectomy, and proctectomy (2005 through 2012) were divided into 6 contrasting subgroups (elderly vs nonelderly, white vs nonwhite, obese vs nonobese, renal insufficiency vs normal renal function, cancer vs noncancer, emergency vs nonemergency). The main end point was serious morbidity or mortality. Observed to expected ratios were constructed using hierarchical models and compared using paired t-tests (eg observed to expected for cancer cases compared with noncancer). Variation in performance differences was assessed using a randomization test and z-tests for proportions., Results: From 433 hospitals, 221,518 patients were included. Overall quality differed for elderly vs nonelderly, renal insufficiency vs normal renal function patients, cancer vs noncancer, and emergency vs nonemergency (p < 0.05). Variation in within-hospital performance differences exceeded chance expectations for renal insufficiency vs normal renal function in 31.1% of hospitals, cancer vs noncancer in 40.8%, and emergency vs nonemergency patients in 55.4% (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Hospital performance within a given hospital varies by patient subgroup. Quality programs can consider separate reports for these subgroups to identify opportunities for quality improvement., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of delayed postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing oncologic lung resections, despite adherence to current in-hospital VTE prophylaxis guidelines., Methods: Patients undergoing lung resection for malignancy in 2 tertiary-care centers were recruited between June 2013 and December 2014. All patients received guideline-based VTE prophylaxis until hospital discharge. Patients underwent computed tomography chest angiography with pulmonary embolism (PE) protocol and bilateral lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasonography at 30 ± 5 days after surgery to determine the incidence of postoperative VTE. Univariate analysis was used to compare the VTE and non-VTE groups., Results: A total of 157 patients were included, 45.9% were men with a mean age of 66.7 years. VTE prevalence was 12.1% with a total of 19 VTE events, including 14 PEs (8.9%), 3 deep venous thromboses (DVTs) (1.9%), 1 combined PE/DVT, and 1 massive left atrial thrombus originating from the pulmonary vein stump after pulmonary lobectomy. PE events occurred in the operated lung 64% of the time and 4 patients (21.1%) were symptomatic at diagnosis. The 30-day mortality rate of VTE events was 5.2%, with 1 patient who died secondary to massive in situ ipsilateral PE following readmission to the hospital. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between the VTE and non-VTE populations with regard to baseline characteristics., Conclusions: Despite adherence to in-hospital standard prophylaxis guidelines, VTE events are frequent, often asymptomatic, and with associated significant morbidity and mortality. More research into the potential role of predischarge screening and extended prophylaxis is warranted., (Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Positive margins following pulmonary resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occur in approximately 5-15% of patients undergoing a curative procedure. The presence of positive margins negatively impacts long-term outcomes by setting the stage for local and potentially distant disease recurrence. Despite major clinical ramifications, there are very few dedicated reports that examine the implications of positive margins following surgery for NSCLC. Furthermore, published series are typically retrospective studies from single institutions. In this review we analyze published data with special consideration of four pertinent questions: (i) what are the long term outcomes of a positive margin following pulmonary resection?, (ii) is intraoperative margin assessment by frozen section reliable?, (iii) what is the optimal distance of the tumor margin to the surgical margin?, and (iv) should adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy be used in the setting of a positive surgical margin?, (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Testing stimulates learning, improves long-term retention, and promotes technical performance. No purpose-orientated test of competence in the theoretical aspects of VATS lobectomy has previously been presented. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to develop and gather validity evidence for a theoretical test on VATS lobectomy consisting of multiple-choice questions., Methods: Four European VATS lobectomy experts were interviewed to explore their views on important theoretical VATS lobectomy knowledge (step 1). This information was used to construct the test items in compliance with existing guidelines for multiple-choice questions (step 2). The experts rated the relevance of the items to confirm content validity in a modified Delphi approach (step 3). Finally, the test was administered to physicians, who were categorised into different experience levels based on their experience in VATS procedures overall and in VATS lobectomies specifically. Their answers were used to achieve construct validity (step 4)., Results: Initially, 81 items were constructed and two Delphi iterations reduced the test to 50 items. Item analysis led to the exclusion of 19 items and the mean discrimination index of the 31 final items was 0.26. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.75. The mean item difficulty was calculated to 0.63. According to performed VATS procedures, significantly different test performances were detected when comparing the group performances (p = 0.002) and the experts performed significantly better than the novices (p < 0.001) and intermediates (p = 0.01). In the category of performed VATS lobectomies, significant group performances were also found. In this category, the experts were also significantly better than the novices (p < 0.001), the trainees (p = 0.002), and the intermediates (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: This study led to the development of a theoretical test on VATS lobectomy consisting of multiple-choice questions. Both content and construct validity evidence were established.

Objectives: In the Netherlands, surgery for lung cancer is traditionally performed in low-volume hospitals. To assess the need for centralization, we examined early outcome measures and compared results between hospitals and with other European countries., Methods: Data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Results were tabulated for 30-day postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity rate (intrathoracic empyema, bronchopleural fistula or rethoracotomy) and pneumonectomy proportion. Hospital variation was projected using funnel graphs in which the results for individual hospitals are plotted against volume., Results: The study comprised a series of 9579 patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer, diagnosed from 2005 through 2010 and operated in 79 different hospitals. The POM was 2.7% on average and age, gender, period and type of surgery were determined as prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis did not reveal an association with hospital volume (P = 0.34). The POM was higher for operations on Fridays (4.0%) or during weekends (6.8%). Major morbidity was observed after 8.3% of operations and was more frequent after bilobectomy (11.6%) or right pneumonectomy (22%). The pneumonectomy proportion decreased from 18% in 2005 to 11% in 2010. Funnel plots revealed a limited number of significant outliers, despite combining data over a 6-year period., Conclusions: Results for the Netherlands were similar to those from other European countries. Hospital volume was not associated with early outcome indicators. Quality assessment at the hospital level remains a major challenge given the low frequency of adverse events and the impediments of chance variation., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance., Methods: Hospitals associated with the Division of Chest Surgery of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine held joint meetings involving their thoracic surgeons and operating room nurses between February 2011 and November 2012 to standardize surgical tasks. Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization., Results: The implementation rate of standardized surgical tasks was 97%. The pre-operative (from entry to the operating room until commencement of surgery) and post-operative (from conclusion of surgery until departure from the operating room) times were significantly decreased after the standardization. When compared according to operative group (all thoracic surgery, lung lobectomy, and partial lung resection), operation times were shorter for all three groups; in addition, the amount of blood loss was lower in all three groups after standardization. A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants., Conclusions: Interdisciplinary standardization of surgical tasks across institutions improved thoracic surgery tasks and surgical outcomes.

Background: Guidelines have been issued for the management of lung cancer patients in the United Kingdom. However, compliance with these national guidelines varies in different thoracic units in the country. We set out to evaluate our thoracic surgery practice and compliance with the national guidelines., Methods: An initial audit in 2011 showed deficiencies in practice, thus another audit was conducted to check for improvements in guideline compliance. A retrospective study was carried out over a 12-month period from January 2013 to January 2014 and included all patients who underwent radical surgical resection for lung cancer. Data were collected from computerized records., Results: Sixty-eight patients had radical surgery for lung cancer between January 2013 and January 2014. Four patients were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete records. Our results showed improvements in our practice compared to our initial audit. More patients underwent surgery within 4 weeks of computed tomography and positron-emission tomography scanning. An improvement was noticed in carbon monoxide transfer factor measurements. Areas for improvement include measurement of carbon monoxide transfer factor in all patients, a cardiology referral in patients at risk of cardiac complications, and the use of a global risk stratification model such as Thoracoscore., Conclusion: Guideline-directed service delivery provision for lung cancer patients leads to improved outcomes. Our results show improvement in our practice compared to our initial audit. We aim to liaise with other thoracic surgery units to get feedback about their practice and any audits regarding adherence to the British Thoracic Society and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Objectives: The objective of this investigation was to assess satisfaction with care of patients with long hospital stay (LHS) or complications after pulmonary resection in comparison with case-matched counterparts with a regular postoperative course., Methods: This is a prospective observational analysis on 171 consecutive patients submitted to pulmonary resections (78 wedges, 8 segmentectomies, 83 lobectomies, 3 pneumonectomies) for benign (35), primary (93) or secondary malignant (43) diseases. A hospital stay >7 days was defined as long (LHS). Major cardiopulmonary complications were defined according to the ESTS database. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the administration of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 module at discharge. The questionnaire is a 32-item self-administered survey including different scales, reflecting the perceived level of satisfaction about the care provided by doctors, nurses and other personnel. To minimize selection bias, propensity score case-matching technique was applied to generate two sets of matched patients: patients with LHS with counterparts without it; patients with complications with counterparts without it., Results: Median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (range 2-43). Forty-one patients (24%) had a hospital stay>7 days and 21 developed cardiopulmonary complications (12%). Propensity score yielded two well-matched groups of 41 patients with and without LHS. There were no significant differences in any patient satisfaction scale between the two groups. The comparison of the results of the patient satisfaction questionnaire between the two matched groups of 21 patients with and without complications did not show significant differences in any scale., Conclusions: Patients experiencing poor outcomes such as long hospital stay or complications have similar perception of quality of care compared with those with regular outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of the quality of care and may complement more traditional objective indicators such as morbidity or length of stay., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are candidates for surgical intervention with curative intent. For these early-stage lung cancer surgeries, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is considered. The purpose of this article is to propose a recommendation for this according to the evidence and provide information for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer from the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery. The clinical question here is whether VATS lobectomy is recommended for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC., Methods: The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery guidelines committee reviewed and summarized the available literature and assessed the quality of the evidence. The available literature on VATS was examined using references from MEDLINE. The recommendations were provided according to the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in Japan (Minds)., Results: VATS lobectomy may be considered and applied to patients with clinical stage I NSCLC; however, well-established evidence is lacking. VATS showed better or at least equivalent outcomes regarding intra- or postoperative complications compared with thoracotomy, with less invasiveness. Additionally, long-term survival by VATS lobectomy was suggested to be at least equivalent, although there is a lack of evidence., Conclusions: VATS lobectomy by an experienced surgeon is associated with minimal invasiveness and an outcome equivalent to that of open lobectomy in stage I NSCLC. (Recommendation grade: Level C1).

Objectives: The National Emphysema Treatment Trial demonstrated that lung volume reduction surgery is an effective treatment for emphysema in select patients. With chronic lower respiratory disease being the third leading cause of death in the United States, this study sought to assess practice patterns and outcomes for lung volume reduction surgery on a national level since the National Emphysema Treatment Trial., Methods: Aggregate statistics on lung volume reduction surgery reported in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database from January 2003 to June 2011 were analyzed to assess procedure volume, preoperative and operative characteristics, and outcomes. Comparisons with published data from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial were made using chi-square and 2-sided t tests., Results: In 8.5 years, 538 patients underwent lung volume reduction surgery, with 20 to 118 cases reported in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database per year. When compared with subjects in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, subjects in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database were younger (P < .001), a larger proportion underwent the procedure thoracoscopically (P < .001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 31% versus 28% of predicted (P < .001). When mortality was compared between subjects in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database and all subjects in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial randomized to surgery, there were no significant differences. However, mortality was 3% higher in subjects in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database when compared with the non-high-risk National Emphysema Treatment Trial subset (P = .005)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of patient selection and the need to develop consensus on appropriate benchmarks for mortality rates after lung volume reduction surgery. It underscores the need for dedicated centers to increasingly address the heavy burden of chronic lower respiratory disease in the United States in a multidisciplinary fashion, particularly for preoperative evaluation and postoperative management of emphysema., (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)