Search

Summary Background Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is a blistering skin disease mediated by antibodies to desmoglein (Dsg) 1. The two major subtypes are nonendemic and endemic PF. A previous study in endemic PF demonstrated that changes in antibody epitope could modulate disease relapse and remission. Objectives To characterize the frequency of immunoreactivity to various Dsg1 extracellular (EC) domains in nonendemic PF and to study if there is any change in epitope profile across various activity stages. Methods Sera from 34 patients with nonendemic PF were selected. To map the conformational epitopes by immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting, we constructed five Dsg1/Dsg2 domain-swapped molecules, with each molecule representing one EC domain of Dsg1 on a backbone of Dsg2. Results Dsg1 EC1, EC2, EC3, EC4 and EC5 domains were recognized by 88%, 50%, 13%, 22% and 0% of active PF sera, respectively. Immunoreactivity to EC3 or EC4 often cosegregated with that to either EC1 or EC2. Longitudinal follow-up of 21 patients with PF for a median of 16 months revealed that, in most cases, immunoreactivity to the amino-terminus of Dsg1 persisted across various activity stages; only two patients lost their EC1 reactivity upon remission and changed their major epitope(s) to EC2 ± EC3. Conclusions Most of the anti-Dsg1 antibodies in nonendemic PF bind to the amino-terminus of Dsg1, a region critical for intercellular adhesion of cadherins, and this skewed amino-terminal immunoreactivity prevails across various activity stages in most patients, even upon remission. These findings are valuable for understanding the biology of Dsg-mediated cellular adhesion as well as for the development of epitope-based monitoring and therapeutic strategies.

Epitope spreading is involved in inducing and maintaining self-reactivity. Epitope spreading in pemphigus vulgaris (PV), caused by IgG autoantibodies to desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) and Dsg1, was previously analyzed using Dsg3/Dsg1 extracellular domain–swapped molecules. However, precise identification of the responsible epitopes in each molecule by using only this method was problematic. In this study, we studied epitope spreading in PV by a novel immunoprecipitation–immunoblot method using Dsg3 (or Dsg1)/Dsg2 domain–swapped molecules, which overcomes the problems associated with the previous approaches. We analyzed the antigenic epitopes recognized by 212 sera collected from 53 PV patients at multiple disease stages. The major epitopes were present at the N-terminal region of Dsgs and were unchanged over the course of the disease in both anti-Dsg3 mucosal dominant-type PV and anti-Dsg3/Dsg1 mucocutaneous-type PV. These N-terminal epitopes were calcium dependent. Circulating antibodies in paraneoplastic pemphigus and pemphigus herpetiformis had unique epitope distributions, although the Dsg N-termini still contained the major epitopes. These results suggest that, after onset, intramolecular and intermolecular epitope spreading among extracellular domains on Dsg3 and Dsg1 is rare in PV and has no correlation with disease course.

Summary Background Oral mucosal lesions develop in pemphigus vulgaris, but not in pemphigus foliaceus. This clinical phenomenon is explained by the ‘desmoglein (Dsg) compensation theory’. Dsg3 and Dsg1 are major autoantigens for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus, respectively. Dsg3 is overexpressed and Dsg1 is weakly expressed on the oral mucosa. Thus, on the oral mucosa, suppression of Dsg3 function by anti-Dsg3 autoantibodies is not compensated by weakly expressed Dsg1 in pemphigus vulgaris, while suppression of Dsg1 function by anti-Dsg1 autoantibodies is perfectly compensated by richly expressed Dsg3 in pemphigus foliaceus. Objectives We present five Japanese patients with pemphigus who deviate from this theory, i.e. all patients showed oral lesions (three also had cutaneous lesions) and reacted only with Dsg1, but not with Dsg3, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Methods To confirm whether the unique clinical phenotypes in our patients were due to a different immunological profile from that in classical pemphigus, we examined the reactivity of the patient sera by immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting analysis using five Dsg1/Dsg2 domain-swapped molecules. Results The sera of two patients who had only oral lesions tended to react with the extracellular (EC) 5 domain of Dsg1, the domain that is considered nonpathogenic in classical pemphigus foliaceus. Sera of three patients with mucocutaneous lesions reacted with EC1 domain or with both EC1 and EC2 domains of Dsg1, like classical pemphigus foliaceus. Conclusions These results indicate that antigenic diversity of anti-Dsg1 antibodies in these patients may cause the unique oral mucosal and cutaneous lesions, although further studies are required to elucidate the pathomechanisms.

Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa commonly affects the distal lower limbs, presenting as nodules, ulcers, and livedo reticularis. We report five cases to illustrate a new specific presentation of cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa on the trunk or proximal extremities. In the acute stage, lesions were tender erythematous plaques. On palpation, 1- to 2-cm diameter subcutaneous nodules were found along the periphery. The lesions responded to dapsone, aspirin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or systemic steroids and healed with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Systemic polyarteritis nodosa did not develop in any patient after a follow-up time ranging from 9 months to 9 years. The presence of small nodules at the periphery of an inflammatory plaque was a useful clinical clue, because this prompted us to suspect cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa when we encountered similar cases later, which could be confirmed histologically. In conclusion, cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa can present as inflammatory plaques on the trunk and proximal extremities, and the presence of peripheral nodules around these plaques constitutes a useful clinical clue to its diagnosis.