Search

BACKGROUND Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows for steering of the stimulation field, but extensive and time-consuming testing of all segmented contacts is necessary to identify the possible benefit of steering. It is therefore important to determine under which circumstances directional current steering is advantageous. METHODS Fifty two Parkinson's disease patients implanted in the STN with a directional DBS system underwent a standardized monopolar programming session 5 to 9 months after implantation. Individual contacts were tested for a potential advantage of directional stimulation. Results were used to build a prediction model for the selection of ring levels that would benefit from directional stimulation. RESULTS On average, there was no significant difference in therapeutic window between ring-level contact and best directional contact. However, according to our standardized protocol, 35% of the contacts and 66% of patients had a larger therapeutic window under directional stimulation compared to ring-mode. The segmented contacts warranting directional current steering could be predicted with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 57%. CONCLUSION To reduce time required for DBS programming, we recommend additional directional contact testing initially only on ring-level contacts with a therapeutic window of less than 2.0 mA.

BACKGROUND The landscape of neurophysiological symptoms and behavioral biomarkers in basal ganglia signals for movement disorders is expanding. The clinical translation of sensing-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) also requires a thorough understanding of the anatomical organization of spectral biomarkers within the subthalamic nucleus (STN). OBJECTIVES The aims were to systematically investigate the spectral topography, including a wide range of sub-bands in STN local field potentials (LFP) of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and to evaluate its predictive performance for clinical response to DBS. METHODS STN-LFPs were recorded from 70 PD patients (130 hemispheres) awake and at rest using multicontact DBS electrodes. A comprehensive spatial characterization, including hot spot localization and focality estimation, was performed for multiple sub-bands (delta, theta, alpha, low-beta, high-beta, low-gamma, high-gamma, and fast-gamma (FG) as well as low- and fast high-frequency oscillations [HFO]) and compared to the clinical hot spot for rigidity response to DBS. A spectral biomarker map was established and used to predict the clinical response to DBS. RESULTS The STN shows a heterogeneous topographic distribution of different spectral biomarkers, with the strongest segregation in the inferior-superior axis. Relative to the superiorly localized beta hot spot, HFOs (FG, slow HFO) were localized up to 2 mm more inferiorly. Beta oscillations are spatially more spread compared to other sub-bands. Both the spatial proximity of contacts to the beta hot spot and the distance to higher-frequency hot spots were predictive for the best rigidity response to DBS. CONCLUSIONS The spatial segregation and properties of spectral biomarkers within the DBS target structure can additionally be informative for the implementation of next-generation sensing-based DBS. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. Stimulation of the hyperdirect pathway (HDP) may mediate the beneficial effects, whereas stimulation of the corticospinal tract (CST) mediates capsular side effects. The study's objective was to suggest stimulation parameters based on the activation of the HDP and CST. This retrospective study included 20 Parkinson's disease patients with bilateral STN DBS. Patient-specific whole-brain probabilistic tractography was performed to extract the HDP and CST. Stimulation parameters from monopolar reviews were used to estimate volumes of tissue activated and to determine the streamlines of the pathways inside these volumes. The activated streamlines were related to the clinical observations. Two models were computed, one for the HDP to estimate effect thresholds and one for the CST to estimate capsular side effect thresholds. In a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, the models were used to suggest stimulation parameters. The models indicated an activation of 50% of the HDP at effect threshold, and 4% of the CST at capsular side effect threshold. The suggestions for best and worst levels were significantly better than random suggestions. Finally, we compared the suggested stimulation thresholds with those from the monopolar reviews. The median suggestion errors for the effect threshold and side effect threshold were 1 and 1.5 mA, respectively. Our stimulation models of the HDP and CST suggested STN DBS settings. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to optimize tract-guided DBS programming. Together with other modalities, these may allow for assisted STN DBS programming.

Deep brain stimulation is an effective neurosurgical intervention for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease. Despite its success, the underlying mechanisms are still debated. One tool to better understand them is the Volume of Tissue Activated (VTA), that estimates the region activated by electrical stimulation. Different estimation approaches exist, these typically assume isotropic tissue properties and modelling of anisotropy is often lacking.The present work was aimed at developing and testing a method for patient-specific VTA estimation that incorporated an anisotropic conduction model. Our method was implemented within the open-source toolbox Lead-DBS and is accessible to the public.The present method was further tested with two patient cases and compared to a standard Lead-DBS pipeline for VTA estimation. This showed encouraging similarities in one test scenario and expected differences in another test scenario. Further validation with a wider cohort is warranted.