Search

Background: Listening difficulties may frequently occur in school settings, but so far there were no tools to identify them for both hearing and hearing-impaired Italian students. This study performed cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Listening Inventory for Education-Revised for Italian students (LIFE-R-ITA). Methods: The study procedure followed the stages suggested by the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. For the content validation, six cochlear implanted students (8–18 years old) pre-tested the initial version. Whenever any situation did not occur in Italy, the item was adapted to more typical listening situations in Italy. The final version of LIFE-R-ITA was administered to a sample of 223 hearing students from different school settings and educational degrees in order to collect normative data. Results: For the LIFE-R-ITA, hearing students showed an average score of 72.26% (SD = 11.93), reflecting some listening difficulties. The subscales (LIFE total, LIFE class, and LIFE social) indicated good internal consistency. All items were shown to be relevant. Most challenging situations happened when listening in large rooms, especially when other students made noise. LIFE social scores were significantly worse than those of LIFE class (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The present study provides cross-cultural adaptation and validation for the LIFE-R-ITA along with the normative data useful to interpret the results of students with hearing loss. The LIFE-R-ITA may support teachers and clinicians in assessing students' self-perception of listening at school. Such understanding may help students overcome their listening difficulties, by planning and selecting the most effective strategies among classroom interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Immune-mediated inner ear disease (IMIED) might cause severe/profound hearing loss and these patients are considered ideal candidates to cochlear implant (CI) surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate impedance changes over time.Method: The Study Group (SG) was composed of CI IMIED patients (31 ears) and a Control Group (CG) of CI patients with hearing loss not related to their immune system (31 ears). Audiological performance and impedance values were measured and compared amongst groups at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months following the fitting sessions.Results: Speech perception was significantly better for SG in word and sentence recognition in quiet. Impedance values were, on average, significantly higher for apical and middle electrode segments in SG compared to CG at the 3- month follow-up and were maintained over time. Additionally, a subset of SG patients (active patients) experienced significantly greater impedance fluctuation corresponding to clinical symptom reactivation.Conclusion: IMIED patients achieve good audiological performance. However, the relapsing inflammation could change the inner ear environment, causing impedance fluctuations and, consequently, more frequent CI fittings. Additionally, impedance evaluation could be utilized as an early warning sign of IMIED recurrence and as an aid to therapeutic decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bimodal stimulation is a standard option for asymmetric hearing loss in adults. Questions have been raised whether receiving two stimulations may conflict in elderly listeners where the central integration of an acoustic/electrical signal may be very important to obtain benefit in terms of speech perception. Clinical retrospective study. The outcomes from 17 bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users were analysed. The test material consisted of speech audiometry in quiet and in noise (STARR and Matrix). Bimodal PTA and speech perception both in quiet and in noise were significantly better than CI or HA alone. Age showed a significant effect on bimodal STARR outcomes. Similarly, bimodal STARR scores improved significantly in comparison to Better Ear. Both Matrix and STARR tests were very difficult for many elderly CI listeners from the present study group, especially in unilateral listening condition. The performance improved significantly, emphasising a good integration of acoustic and electric hearing in this group of elderly bimodal listeners. Overall results highlighted how a specific study, based on speech perception in noise in the elderly listeners, might shed light on the effect of speech test modality on bimodal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]