Search

A unified formulation is presented for non-linear time history, static pushover and limit analysis of historic masonry structures modelled as 2D assemblages of rigid blocks interacting at no-tension, frictional contact interfaces. The dynamic, incremental static and limit analysis problems are formulated as mathematical programming problems which are equivalent to the equations system governing equilibrium, kinematics and contact failure. Available algorithms from the field of mathematical programming, contact dynamics and limit analysis are used to tackle the contact problems between rigid blocks in a unified framework. To evaluate the accuracy and computational efficiency of the implemented formulation, applications to numerical case studies from the literature are presented. The case studies comprise rigid blocks under earthquake excitation, varying lateral static loads and sliding motion. A set of two leaves wall panels and an arch-pillars system are also analysed to compare failure mechanisms, displacement capacity and magnitudes of lateral loads promoting the collapse.

Displacement-based methods contained in recent standards for seismic safety assessment require the determination of the full nonlinear pushover curve for local failure mechanisms in historic masonry structures. This curve should reflect both the initial elastic behavior and the rigid body behavior after the activation of rocking. In this work, a rigid block model is proposed for the displacement-based seismic assessment of local collapse mechanisms of these structures. Masonry is modeled as an assemblage of two-dimensional rigid blocks in contact through frictional interfaces. Two types of contact models are formulated to capture, respectively, the pre and postpeak branches of the pushover curve: a unilateral elastic contact model, capturing the initial nonlinear behavior up to the force capacity of the structure, corresponding to the activation of the collapse mechanism, and a rigid contact model with finite friction and compressive strength, which describes the rigid-body rocking behavior up to the attainment of the displacement capacity of the structure. Tension-only elements are also implemented to model strengthening interventions with tie-rods. The contact problems associated with the elastic and rigid contact models are formulated using mathematical programming. For both models, a sequential solution procedure is implemented to capture the variation of the load multiplier with the increasing deformation of the structure (P–Δ effect). The accuracy of the modeling approach in reproducing the pushover curve of masonry panels subjected to horizontal seismic loads is evaluated on selected case studies. The solution is first tested against hand calculations, existing analytical models, and distinct element simulations. Then, comparisons against experimental tests follow. As a final application, the failure mechanism and pushover curve of a triumphal masonry arch are predicted by the model and its seismic assessment is performed according to codified force- and displacement-based methods, demonstrating the adequacy of the proposed tool for practice.

This paper deals with the force-based assessment of collapse mechanisms and strengthening interventions of the historic masonry castle &ldquo, Bussi sul Tirino&rdquo, (Abruzzi, Italy) using rigid block limit analysis (RBLA). The structure, which is a fortified palace dating back to the 11th century, has experienced severe earthquakes over the centuries and was hit once again in 2009 by the L&rsquo, Aquila earthquake. Based on the historical analysis and the results of in situ investigations, a spatial rigid block model of an entire structural unit was generated using the in-house software LiABlock_3D. The software is a MATLAB&reg, based tool for three-dimensional RBLA, which provides as outputs collapse failure modes and collapse load multipliers. In addition, a specific routine was developed for the purpose of the study to compute the participating mass ratio and the spectral acceleration that activated the failure mechanisms. The results of the numerical analysis were used to address three different retrofitting interventions, based on the use of connection elements and ties that, according to the minimum intervention principle, progressively enhanced the seismic capacity. Comparisons in terms of seismic safety indices are finally provided in order to give a quantitative measure of the effectiveness of the adopted retrofitting strategies.

This paper deals with the vulnerability assessment of historic masonry structures subjected to settlements using rigid block modelling. A 2-D rigid block model with unilateral elastic contacts and finite friction is developed for the evaluation of the displacement capacity in the large displacement regime by push-down analysis. A variational formulation of the rigid block model is adopted, which relies on associative behavior for displacement rates. Under this assumption, the equation systems governing the behavior of the rigid block model can be uncoupled into two equivalent force and displacement-based problems, thus reducing computational costs. The numerical model was validated against the results of an ad-hoc experimental campaign on small scale tuff panels and against the tests on a small-scale masonry facade subjected to moving supports, from the literature. Applications of the proposed modelling approach are presented to the assessment of a full scale, monumental masonry facade. Following classic force-displacement methods that are used in the case of seismic actions, capacity curves are proposed for the damage assessment induced by settlements. Those state the relation between the base reaction at the moving supports and the displacement of a control point, which is obtained from the push-down analysis. Finally, comparisons with empirical assessment methods from the literature are presented.