Search

Background Individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a high risk of breast and ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1/2 deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency that can be detected by analysis of genome-wide genomic instability features such as large-scale state transitions, telomeric allelic imbalances, and genomic loss of heterozygosity. Malignancies with homologous recombination deficiency are more sensitive to platinum-based therapies and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We investigated the fraction of non–breast or ovarian malignancies that have BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features. Methods The full tumor history of a large, historical, clinic-based, consecutive cohort of 2965 individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 /2 was retrieved from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). In total, 169 non–breast or ovarian malignancies were collected and analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing to determine somatic second-hit alterations and genomic instabilities indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, respectively. Results BRCA1/2 deficiency was detected in 27% (21/79) and 23% (21/90) of 20 different types of non–breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. These malignancies had a higher genomic instability score than BRCA1 - or BRCA2 -proficient malignancies (P  <  .001 and P  <  .001, respectively). Conclusions BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features were found in 27% and 23% of a broad spectrum of non–breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Evaluation of the effectiveness of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in these individuals should be focused on tumors with a confirmed absence of a wild-type allele. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CHEK2 is considered to be involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Individuals who have germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in CHEK2 are at increased risk to develop breast cancer and likely other primary cancers. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of cancers that present with HRR deficiency—for example, caused by inactivation of BRCA1/2. However, clinical trials have shown little to no efficacy of PARPi in patients with CHEK2 gPVs. Here, we show that both breast and non-breast cancers from individuals who have biallelic gPVs in CHEK2 (germline CHEK2 deficiency) do not present with molecular profiles that fit with HRR deficiency. This finding provides a likely explanation why PARPi therapy is not successful in the treatment of CHEK2 -deficient cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Treatment outcomes of incidental gallbladder cancer generally stem from tertiary referral centres, while many patients are initially diagnosed and managed in secondary care centres. Referral patterns of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer are poorly reported. This study aimed to evaluate incidental gallbladder cancer treatment in secondary centres, rates of referral to tertiary centres and its impact on survival. Methods Medical records of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 in 27 Dutch secondary centres were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, surgical treatment, tumour characteristics, referral pattern and survival were assessed. Predictors for overall survival were determined using multivariable Cox regression. Results In total, 382 patients with incidental gallbladder cancer were included. Of 243 patients eligible for re-resection (pT1b–pT3, M0), 131 (53.9%) were referred to a tertiary centre. The reason not to refer, despite indication for re-resection, was not documented for 52 of 112 non-referred patients (46.4%). In total, 98 patients underwent additional surgery with curative intent (40.3%), 12 of these in the secondary centre. Median overall survival was 33 months (95% c.i. 24 to 42 months) in referred patients versus 17 months (95% c.i. 3 to 31 months) in the non-referred group (P = 0.019). Referral to a tertiary centre was independently associated with improved survival after correction for age, ASA classification, tumour stage and resection margin (HR 0.60, 95% c.i. 0.38 to 0.97; P = 0.037). Conclusion Poor incidental gallbladder cancer referral rates were associated with worse survival. Age, performance status, resection margin or tumour stage should not preclude referral of a patient with incidental gallbladder cancer to a tertiary centre. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]