Search

Background and Aim of the Study Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice to correct mitral regurgitation. However, some dangerous iatrogenic complications can occur at the end of the procedure. Therefore, we sought to review the most frequent and clinically relevant acute iatrogenic complication following mitral valve repair. Methods A thorough review of the literature has been performed. Criteria for considering studies for this non-systematic review were as follows: observational and interventional studies investigating the acute iatrogenic complications following mitral valve repair, and essential review studies pertinent to the topic. Results The most frequent is the systolic anterior motion. Due to a systolic dislocation of the anterior leaflet toward the outflow tract, it causes both obstruction of the outflow tract and mitral regurgitation. Often it is due to excess of catecholamines or to reduced filling of the left ventricle but sometimes needs further surgical maneuvers, focused on moving posteriorly the coaptation line. It can be obtained by shortening the posterior leaflet or increasing the size of the ring or applying an Alfieri stitch to limit the movements of the anterior leaflet. Another complication, often underdiagnosed and potentially lethal, is the injury of the circumflex artery that happens at the level of the anterolateral commissure or P1 zone. Two mechanisms are involved. The first one is the direct injury of the artery by a stitch (roughly 25% of the patients present a distance artery-annulus

Background and Aim of the Study Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice to correct mitral regurgitation. However, some dangerous iatrogenic complications can occur at the end of the procedure. Therefore, we sought to review the most frequent and clinically relevant acute iatrogenic complication following mitral valve repair. Methods A thorough review of the literature has been performed. Criteria for considering studies for this non-systematic review were as follows: observational and interventional studies investigating the acute iatrogenic complications following mitral valve repair, and essential review studies pertinent to the topic. Results The most frequent is the systolic anterior motion. Due to a systolic dislocation of the anterior leaflet toward the outflow tract, it causes both obstruction of the outflow tract and mitral regurgitation. Often it is due to excess of catecholamines or to reduced filling of the left ventricle but sometimes needs further surgical maneuvers, focused on moving posteriorly the coaptation line. It can be obtained by shortening the posterior leaflet or increasing the size of the ring or applying an Alfieri stitch to limit the movements of the anterior leaflet. Another complication, often underdiagnosed and potentially lethal, is the injury of the circumflex artery that happens at the level of the anterolateral commissure or P1 zone. Two mechanisms are involved. The first one is the direct injury of the artery by a stitch (roughly 25% of the patients present a distance artery-annulus

Small leaflets make mitral valve repair procedures challenging. Our double-leaflet technique creates a new autologous pericardial leaflet attached to the papillary muscle, annuloplasty ring, and neighboring scallops above the small or tethered posterior leaflet. This simple additional technique provides deep coaptation after mitral valve repair for both degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation with the small or tethered posterior leaflet.

Objectives Barlow´s disease represents a wide spectrum of mitral valve pathologies associated with regurgitation (MR), excess leaflet tissue, and prolapse. Repair strategies range from complex repairs with annuloplasty plus neochords through resection to annuloplasty-only. The latter requires symmetric prolapse patterns and central regurgitant jets. We aimed to assess repair success and durability, survival, and intraoperative outcomes with symmetric and asymmetric Barlow’s disease. Methods Between 09/10 and 03/20, 103 patients (of 1939 with mitral valve surgery) presented with Barlow´s disease. All received surgery through mini-thoracotomy with annuloplasty plus neochords (n = 71) or annuloplasty-only (n = 31). One valve was replaced for endocarditis (repair rate: 99%). Results Annuloplasty-only patients were older (64 ± 16 vs. 55 ± 11 years, p = 0.008) and presented with higher risk (EuroSCORE II: 4.2 ± 4.9 vs. 1.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.007). Annuloplasty-only patients had shorter cross-clamp times (53 ± 18 min vs. 76 ± 23 min, p p p = 0.455). In three patients, annuloplasty-only caused intraoperative systolic anterior motion (SAM), which was fully resolved by neochords to the posterior leaflet. There were no conversions to sternotomy or deaths at 30-days. Three patients required reoperation for recurrent MR (at 25 days, 2.8 and 7.8 years). At the latest follow-up, there was no MR in 81.4%, mild in 14.7%, and moderate in 2.9%. Three patients died due to non-cardiac reasons. Surviving patients report the absence of relevant symptoms. Conclusions Minimally-invasive Barlow’s repair is safe with good durability. Annuloplasty-only may be a simple solution for complex but symmetric pathologies. However, it may carry an increased risk of intraoperative SAM.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Leaflet resection and chordal reconstruction are established repair techniques for posterior mitral valve (MV) prolapse. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of the resect and respect approaches, with a particular focus on MV hemodynamics. METHODS Overall, 291 patients who underwent elective MV repair for isolated posterior leaflet prolapse between 2012 and 2020 were enrolled. Patients who underwent leaflet resection alone were classified as the "resection" group (n = 166), while patients who underwent neochordal replacement with/without limited leaflet resection were classified as the "respect" group (n = 125). Early postoperative MV hemodynamics and midterm repair durability were compared between the groups. RESULTS The annuloplasty ring size was significantly larger in the respect group than in the resection group (31.0 ± 2.1 vs. 30.4 ± 2.0 mm, p = .028). The respect group showed significantly lower mean MV gradient (2.6 ± 1.1 vs. 3.0 ± 1.4 mmHg, p = .03) and larger effective orifice area (EOA) (1.86 ± 0.48 vs. 1.66 ± 0.47 cm2 , p

Highlights • Robotic TEMVR is the most advanced level of MICS. • We have performed TEMVR using no robotic system. • The used equipment included MICS instruments and a 3D Endoscopic system. • We improved mitral valve exposure techniques and surgical port placement. • We used sutures as a left atrial retractor to expose mitral valve., Introduction Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair (TEMVR) is the highest level of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). It brings many benefits to patients but the downside is that a robotic system is always required. The deployment of robotic surgery is very complicated and expensive. Therefore, we improvised, making it possible to perform TEMVR without the aid of a robotic system. Presentation of case A 66-year-old male patient presented with severe mitral valve regurgitation due to posterior leaflet prolapse. He was treated with TEMVR without robotic assistance. No chest incision was over 1.2 cm. The repair techniques included posterior leaflet resection and annuloplasty with ring implantation. Discussion A midline sternotomy is still the standard approach for mitral valve repair. In recent years, MICS has gradually replaced conventional surgery with the most advanced strategy being totally robotic mitral valve repair. However, complex surgical techniques and high cost make it less accessible for the majority of patients. Instead of using robot, we improved mitral valve exposure techniques, surgical port placement and therefore were able to perform TEMVR with MICS instruments. Conclusion TEMVR without robotic assistance is a safe, effective and cost-efficient procedure, which can be adopted in most cardiac centers.

Structured Abstract Objectives We sought to develop a method for posterior leaflet remodeling using an adjustable neochord. The method is designed to preserve posterior leaflet function and to improve reliability and precision of the procedure. Methods From December 2016 through August 2018 22 patients underwent mitral valve repair with the adjustable posterior neochords at Yale New Haven Hospital. Pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative echocardiographic assessment of the mitral valve were collected and analyzed. Follow-up information was obtained from data collected at postoperative clinic visits and via written correspondence from local physicians. Results 77% of cases were performed through a minimally invasive approach where full sternotomy was reserved for patients with a contraindication to peripheral CBP or in those who required concomitant procedures. A total of 36 procedures were performed in a cohort of 22 patients. The most common concurrent procedure was MAZE (22%) followed by left atrial appendage ligation (18%) All attempts at mitral valve repair were successful and several adjunctive techniques used in addition to the placement of adjustable neochords to the posterior leaflet and are listed in table 1. Post procedurally 72% of patients had no detectable MR and the remaining patients had a grade of mild or less. There were no re-operations in the study period and no patients developed systolic anterior motion (SAM). Conclusions We report on a novel technique for implantation of neochordae and demonstrate excellent safety and efficacy in a series of 22 patients treated with this technique.

Objectives: to evaluate the advantage of preserving the subvalvular structures of the mitral valve from both leaflets compared with the preservation of the subvalvular structures only from the posterior valve during mitral valve replacement surgery (MVR). Methods: A retrospective analysis of case histories of 41 patients with isolated rheumatic lesions of the mitral valve who underwent MVR, which were divided into 2 groups: with complete preservation of subvalvular structures (n = 24) and preservation of only the posterior leaflet (n = 17), was performed. Results: In the group with complete preservation of the chordal-papillary apparatus, there was a significant decrease in the end-systolic volume (p

Mitral valve (MV) repair for infective endocarditis (IE) is sometimes challenging. We investigated the durability of repair associated with the location of the infected lesion.The study comprised 83 patients (55 ± 18 years; active, 66; healed, 17) who underwent MV repair at our institution. Patients were categorized into 5 types based on the location of the main lesion: type I, posterior leaflet (n = 36); type IIC, clear zone of anterior leaflet (n = 12); type IIR, rough zone of anterior leaflet (n = 28); and type III, annulus (n = 7). Type IIR was divided into 2 subgroups: IIR-large (1 segment involvement, n = 9) and IIR-small (1 segment, n = 19).Follow-up was 95.2% completed for 7.2 ± 5.2 years. The rate of recurrent moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) was 2.8% in type I, 0% in type IIC, 28.6% in type IIR, and 14.3% in type III. The freedom from recurrent moderate or severe MR was significantly lower in type IIR compared with the other types (63.1% ± 10.6% vs 96.8 ± 3.2% at 5 years, P .001). Moreover, the recurrence rate was higher in type IIR-large (55.6%) than in type IIR-small (15.8%, P = .068). Type IIR was an independent predictor of recurrent MR (hazard ratio, 11.1, 95% confidence interval, 2.52-78.2; P = .001).The durability of MV repair for IE was satisfactory in posterior leaflet infection without annulus invasion and in clear zone infection of the anterior leaflet. However, rough zone infection of the anterior leaflet, especially with more than 1 segment involvement, was associated with a high risk of recurrent MR.

Background A mitral cleft may be an important etiological factor for significant mitral regurgitation. We diagnose an additional cleft mitral valve by a combination of 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography. Case presentation We describe the case of a severe mitral regurgitation due to posterior leaflet prolapse (P2). In the 2-D view, which is obtained after turning the probe clockwise from the mid-esophageal long-axis view, TEE showed a moderate central regurgitation jet. In the 3-D en face view, a cleft between P2 and P3 was identified, and we found that the cause of mitral regurgitation was not only P2 prolapse but also a cleft between P2 and P3. Conclusion A complex mitral valve lesion was detected by a combination of 2-D and 3-D TEE. The presence of a cleft could affect the surgical procedure because of the possibility that an enlarged cleft would increase with leaflet resection.

Background and aim Second-order chord tethering of the anterior leaflet is a risk factor for failure of posterior leaflet prolapse repair. Materials and methods We describe two cases of second-order chord tethering of the anterior leaflet associated with severe mitral regurgitation due to prolapse or chordal rupture of the anterior leaflet, causing early and late failure of repair. Results We described two cases where this phenomenon happened. Conclusions Our cases demonstrate that the second-order chords of the prolapsing AL can be tethered and that this aspect should be carefully evaluated before surgery, as it can progress over time, affecting the results of surgical repair.

Background Rheumatic mitral valve (MV) disease is the major cause of congestive cardiac failure in children and young adults, particularly in developing countries. Mitral valve repair with minimum prosthetic material is the gold standard treatment for this condition. However, MV repair for rheumatic MV disease is known to be technically demanding. Case summary A 27-year-old woman without a history of cardiac disease presented with dyspnoea on exertion. Echocardiography revealed rheumatic severe mitral stenosis and regurgitation, with thickening of the bileaflets, doming of the anterior leaflet, shortening of the posterior leaflet, fusions of the lateral and particularly the medial commissure, and enlargement of the mitral annulus. We successfully performed robot-assisted MV repair with bicommissural release, patch augmentation of the two leaflets, and implantation of an originally sized partial band. Discussion Robotic MV repair can contribute to precise valve inspection and operative procedures. This approach seems feasible for complex rheumatic MV disease particularly in young patients.

We successfully repaired a hammock mitral valve associated with severe mitral valve regurgitation in a 4-month-old boy using posterior leaflet extension along with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium and the splitting of bilateral papillary muscles. Surgical reinterventions were performed for the bilateral papillary muscles at 14 and 24 months postoperatively. The extended autologous pericardium was still pliable with mild mitral valve regurgitation at 26 months postoperatively.