Search

Item does not contain fulltext, AIMS: We assessed the effect of concomitant aspirin use on the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In ARISTOTLE, 18 201 patients were randomized to apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin. Concomitant aspirin use was left to the discretion of the treating physician. In this predefined analysis, simple and marginal structured models were used to adjust for baseline and time-dependent confounders associated with aspirin use. Outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, mortality, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and any bleeding. On Day 1, 4434 (24%) patients were taking aspirin. Irrespective of concomitant aspirin use, apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism [with aspirin: apixaban 1.12% vs. warfarin 1.91%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.85 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.11% vs. warfarin 1.32%, HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P interaction = 0.10] and caused less major bleeding than warfarin (with aspirin: apixaban 3.10% vs. warfarin 3.92%, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.82% vs. warfarin 2.78%, HR without aspirin 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78; P interaction = 0.29). Similar results were seen in the subgroups of patients with and without arterial vascular disease. CONCLUSION: Apixaban had similar beneficial effects on stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding compared with warfarin, irrespective of concomitant aspirin use.

An association between raised renin levels and myocardial infarction has been reported. We studied the effects of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on the development of myocardial infarction and unstable angina in 6797 patients with ejection fractions Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=3401) or enalapril (n=3396) at doses of 2[middle dot]5-20 mg per day in two concurrent double-blind trials with the same protocol. Patients with heart failure entered the treatment trial (n=2569) and those without heart failure entered the prevention trial (n=4228). Follow-up averaged 40 months. In each trial there were significant reductions in the number of patients developing myocardial infarction (treatment trial: 158 placebo vs 127 enalapril, PEnalapril treatment significantly reduced myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and cardiac mortality in patients with low ejection fractions.

This study assesses the effects of dofetilide, a new selective Ikr blocker with class III properties, on left ventricular function and hemodynamics of heart failure and compares these effects with those of placebo and amiodarone. Because available antiarrhythmic drugs may depress myocardial performance, an invasive hemodynamic study was performed to assess the safety of this agent. Hemodynamic and angiographic data were obtained at baseline and after 30 minutes of double-blind infusion of dofetilide (8 microg/kg; n = 12), placebo (n = 12), or amiodarone (5 mg/kg; n = 6) in heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class II or III, ejection fraction <35%). Intravenous dofetilide preserved the inotropic indexes and the end-systolic volume index despite a slight but significant decrease in heart rate, whereas intravenous amiodarone increased end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes. Amiodarone induced a negative inotropic effect illustrated by a rightward shift of the pressure-volume loop and a reduction in pressure-derived indexes of contractility. Intravenous dofetilide acutely prolonged QT interval more than intravenous amiodarone; however, dofetilide did not slow the overall relaxation rate and reduced QT dispersion. In an acute setting, compared with intravenous amiodarone, intravenous dofetilide preserves cardiac function offering a hemodynamic advantage to treat arrhythmias in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and cardiac natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations have prognostic significance in congestive heart failure (CHF). However, their respective prognostic values in this setting have never been directly compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the prognostic performances of ET-1, N-terminal proatrial natriuretic factor (N-proANF), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to predict the long-term cardiac mortality in fully treated patients with CHF. Peripheral plasma concentrations of the 3 peptides were measured in 109 patients (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 35%) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes II (n = 65) or III to IV (n = 44). The outcome of the patients was evaluated 3 years after the beginning of the study, and a Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of death. Plasma concentrations of the 3 peptides increased with the severity of heart failure. By univariate analysis, 6 parameters were significantly associated with death during follow-up: ET-1 level, NYHA classes III to IV, N-proANF level, BNP level, LVEF, and age (all P < .01). By multivariate analysis, only ET-1 level and, to a lesser extent, N-proANF level contributed significantly and independently to risk stratification (chi2 = 53.4 and 12.8; P < .0001 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In a group of patients in whom the vast majority were administered angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, plasma ET-1 and N-proANF concentrations identify better than several clinical markers a very high-risk group, fairly amenable to heart transplantation or new therapies.

We studied effects of enalaprilat and L-158,809, an angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonist, on left ventricular (LV) diastolic relaxation in 11 normal control dogs and 16 LV hypertrophied (LVH) dogs with perinephritic hypertension. At baseline, LV systolic and end-diastolic pressures and end-systolic elastance were increased in the LVH group (all P < 0.01 vs. the control group). LV relaxation time constant was also prolonged (P < 0.01), suggesting impaired LV diastolic relaxation in this model of LVH. Before and after the administration of enalaprilat (0.25 mg/kg) and L-158,809 (0.30 mg/kg), LV relaxation was assessed over a wide range of LV loading conditions during vena caval occlusion. LV relaxation time constant was insensitive to load reduction in the control group, which was not affected by enalaprilat or L-158,809. In contrast, LV unloading caused a significant prolongation of the relaxation time constant in the LVH group. This load-sensitive LV relaxation abnormality was significantly improved by enalaprilat or L-158,809. These results support the concept that angiotensin II is involved in the pathogenesis of diastolic dysfunction in pressure-overloaded LVH and also suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonists are potentially beneficial in the treatment of the hypertrophied heart.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the hemodynamic and cardiac effects of two dose levels of mibefradil in patients with varying degrees of ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Mibefradil is a new, selective T-type and L-type calcium channel blocking agent. Because L-type channel blockade may depress myocardial performance, an invasive hemodynamic study was performed to assess the safety of this agent. METHODS: We performed an open label study, examining the effects of two intravenous doses of mibefradil, selected to produce plasma levels comparable to those measured after oral administration of 50 mg (dose 1: 400 ng/ml) or 100 mg (dose 2: 800 ng/ml) of the drug. Variables studied included the indexes of left ventricular function and neurohormone levels. Patients were stratified according to ejection fraction (EF) (> or = 40%, n = 26; < 40%, n = 24) and the presence (n = 15) or absence (n = 35) of heart failure. RESULTS: In patients with preserved systolic function, dose 1 had no clinically significant hemodynamic effects, but dose 2 decreased mean aortic pressure and systemic vascular resistance (-8.5 mm Hg, -12%, both p < 0.01) and also reduced end-systolic stress and volume, thus improving EF (52% to 58%, p < 0.01). Heart rate tended to decrease. In patients with depressed EF, heart rate decreased significantly with both doses. The effects of dose 1 mimicked those observed after dose 2 in patients with preserved EF. Dose 2 (plasma levels 1,052 +/- 284 ng/ml) still decreased left ventricular systolic wall stress and improved EF (24.0% to 28.5%, p < 0.05) but also significantly depressed the maximal first derivative of left ventricular pressure. Examination of individual pressure-volume loops in two patients with heart failure showed a clear rightward shift of the loop despite a decrease in systolic pressure, suggesting negative inotropy. Neurohormone levels were unchanged at both dose levels and in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous mibefra

The aim of this study was to compare the effects on left ventricular function and exercise tolerance of a selective beta-antagonist (atenolol) with those of another selective beta 1-antagonist with vasodilator properties (nebivolol) in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction but no overt congestive heart failure. Beta blockers are widely used in ischemic heart disease, but their effects on left ventricular mechanics and exercise tolerance are poorly defined in the subgroup of patients with significant systolic dysfunction but without clinical evidence of ischemia or congestive heart failure. Angiographic and symptom-limited exercise data were obtained at baseline and after an 8-10-week double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 10), 50 mg atenolol daily (n = 10), or 2.5 mg (n = 10) or 5 mg (n = 10) nebivolol daily. When compared to placebo, both atenolol and nebivolol reduced resting heart rate and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (from 33.9 to 39.2% with atenolol and from 36.5 to 40.8% with nebivolol, both P < .05) while lowering mean systolic wall stress. Only nebivolol, however, produced a parallel downward shift of the pressure-volume relationship during early diastolic filling and improved the early peak filling rate when compared to placebo (+ 10%, P < .05). When compared to baseline, maximal exercise duration increased by 7 and 13 seconds with placebo and atenolol, respectively (both NS vs baseline), and increased by 44 seconds with nebivolol (P = .0077 vs baseline). Both atenolol and nebivolol decreased maximal exercise heart rate; the reduction was more pronounced with atenolol. Prolonged beta 1-adrenoceptor blockade leads to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The dissociation between the changes in resting left ventricular function and the changes in exercise duration suggests that in this clinical setting, the changes in systolic function may have less i

BACKGROUND. The changes in myocardial performance responsible for the progression from a stage of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction toward overt congestive heart failure are still poorly understood. Accordingly, using invasive methods, we examined the differences in baseline left ventricular function between a subgroup of patients enrolled in the treatment arm (presence of congestive heart failure) and in the prevention arm (asymptomatic patients) of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS. High-fidelity left ventricular pressures and frame-by-frame angiographic volumes were simultaneously obtained under baseline conditions in 65 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%. Sixteen patients had New York Heart Association congestive heart failure (class II or III), whereas the remaining 49 patients had no clinical signs of heart failure and did not receive therapy for this syndrome. A second set of data was obtained an average of 12.4 months later in 42 patients. The group with heart failure had significantly greater end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes than the asymptomatic group (both p < 0.001), but the stroke index at rest was similar in both groups. Accordingly, ejection fraction was significantly lower in the heart failure group (19.6 +/- 7.0% versus 26.3 +/- 7.2%; p < 0.02). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was greater and peak +dP/dt was lower in heart failure patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Moreover, the individual end-systolic stress/end-systolic volume data of the heart failure patients fell within the 95% confidence interval of the relation observed in the patients without heart failure both at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up irrespective of their changes in functional status. It was also noted that during follow-up, the changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes correlated linearly, as if both d

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of the present study was to assess the process of late regional remodeling and the changes in regional diastolic function at the base and apex of the left ventricle in patients with chronic systolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND. Remodeling has been suggested to play an important role in the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. However, the regional difference in the process of late remodeling and its relation to diastolic function remain unclear. METHODS. In 32 patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%, left ventricular hemodynamic and angiographic data were studied before and 1 year after randomization to conventional therapy with placebo (n = 12) or enalapril, 10 mg twice daily (n = 20). Left ventricular regional wall dynamics were analyzed in the basal and apical regions by the area method. RESULTS. In the placebo group, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic regional areas increased significantly over time at the base but were unchanged at the apex. At the base, the diastolic left ventricular pressure-regional area relation shifted rightward and the regional stiffness constant decreased (6.9 +/- 4.3 to 5.0 +/- 3.1 x 10(-3) mm-2, p < 0.05), indicating an increase in regional distensibility. At the apex, however, the diastolic pressure-regional area relation shifted upward slightly, and the regional stiffness constant increased from 11.5 +/- 4.4 to 14.4 +/- 5.6 x 10(-3) mm-2 (p = 0.08). The regional peak filling rate was maintained at the base but decreased at the apex (1,014 +/- 436 to 762 +/- 306 mm2/s, p < 0.05); further, the changes in regional peak filling rate during follow-up were inversely related to the changes in the regional stiffness constant (r = -0.78, p < 0.001) at the apex. In contrast, in the enalapril group, end-diastolic and end-systolic regional areas significantly decreased over time both at the base and at the apex. Diastolic pressure-re

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on "diastolic stunning" in the postischemic myocardium. In 14 conscious dogs receiving either placebo (n = 7) or ET-1 (2.5 ng.kg-1.min-1, n = 7), left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics and regional wall motion (systolic segmental shortening by sonomicrometry and the ischemic-nonischemic regional asynchrony during isovolumic relaxation) were assessed at baseline, during 10 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (CAO) and at 60 min after reflow (R-60). During CAO, the ischemic segment shortening was severely depressed and both regional asynchrony and LV relaxation time constant were significantly increased in the placebo and ET-1 groups. At R-60, this LV diastolic dysfunction recovered to baseline conditions in the placebo group but was still present in the ET-1 group. Because coronary and myocardial blood flow returned to the baseline level at R-60 in both groups, the deleterious effects of ET-1 on diastolic stunning are probably mediated by its direct action on the myocardium.

BACKGROUND. The aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in left ventricular diastolic function that occur in patients with chronic severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the absence or presence of prolonged therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS. Left ventricular function data (cineangiography plus Millar, frame-by-frame analysis) and right ventricular volumes (radionuclide angiography) were obtained at baseline and after an average follow-up of 12.4 months in 42 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. After baseline measurements, the patients were randomized to placebo (n = 16) or enalapril (10 mg BID, n = 26). In the placebo group, the changes in left ventricular function were characterized by increases in end-diastolic (159 +/- 43 to 170 +/- 44 mL/m2) and end-systolic (119 +/- 38 to 128 +/- 49 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a downward and rightward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. In contrast, decreases in end-diastolic (166 +/- 43 to 156 +/- 47 mL/m2) and end-systolic (125 +/- 43 to 111 +/- 42 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a slight upward and leftward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation were noted in the enalapril group. These changes in left ventricular volumes were significantly different between groups (both P < .005) but were not attended by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, in time constant of isovolumic pressure decrease, or in right ventricular volumes. However, the chamber stiffness constant beta decreased from 0.044 +/- 0.027 to 0.032 +/- 0.019 mL-1/m2 in the placebo group, whereas it increased insignificantly in the enalapril group (0.040 +/- 0.028 to 0.041 +/- 0.028 mL-1/m2). These changes in chamber stiffness constant beta between baseline and follow-up were significantly different between placebo and enalapril groups (P < .05). Another index of chamber compliance, delta V/delta P, also confirmed the presence of opposite

Background. Patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) manifest progressive LV dilatation, which is prevented by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. In patients with asymptomatic LV systolic dysfunction, in whom there is less activation of the renin-angiotensin system, ventricular remodeling might be less rapid and the benefit of ACE inhibitors less discernible. Methods and Results. One hundred eight patients enrolled in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Prevention Trial, with left ventricular ejection fraction less-than-or-equal-to 0.35 but without clinical heart failure, underwent radionuclide ventriculograms, and 49 underwent left heart catheterizations. Measurements were made before and after double-blinded randomization to enalapril (2.5 to 20 mg/d) or placebo. Repeated-measures analysis of all time points showed significant differences for change in end-diastolic volume (EDV) between enalapril and placebo groups. Significant difference between the enalapril and placebo groups (P<.05) was present for change in EDV at 1 year within the catheterization study and at a mean of 25 months within the radionuclide study. Radionuclide EDV increased in placebo patients (119+/-28 to 124+/-33 mL/m2, mean+/-SD) and decreased in enalapril patients (120+/-25 to 113+/-25 mL/m2). Differences between the two groups were significantly less than previously described in patients with symptomatic heart failure (P<.02), with less increase in LV volumes in the placebo group and less decrease in volumes in the enalapril group. Conclusions. Chronic ACE inhibitor treatment slows or reverses LV dilatation in patients with asymptomatic LV systolic dysfunction. Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients manifest a slower rate of spontaneous LV dilatation and less reduction in LV volumes by enalapril.

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling is impaired in hearts with healed myocardial infarction. Possible hemodynamic parameters related to impaired LV filling include left atrial pressure, time constant of isovolumic relaxation, chamber stiffness and wall motion asynchrony. Previous studies demonstrated univariate correlations between each of these parameters and LV filling, The current study was designed to compare relative importance of these parameters in patients with a myocardial infarction. Left ventriculograms with simultaneous LV pressure measurement were analyzed in 15 patients with a myocardial infarction and in 10 control subjects. Every frame of the left ventriculogram was divided into 8 segments and the volume of each segment was obtained frame-by-frame by planimetry and area-length method. Asynchrony was quantitated as the sum of areas of discrepancy between each segmental and global volume-time curve. Patients with myocardial infarction had greater asynchrony (20 +/- 2 vs 10 +/- 1%, p <0.01), greater atrial filling fraction (46 +/- 4 vs 35 +/- 5%, p <0.05) and slower peak early filling rate (2.5 +/- 0.1 vs 4.1 +/- 0.4 end-diastolic volume/s, p <0.01) than the control subjects. Multiple regression analyses with hemodynamic variables (asynchrony, LV pressure at mitral valve opening, time constant of LV isovolumic pressure decrease and LV chamber stiffness constant) showed that asynchrony and LV pressure at mitral valve opening were significant determinants of LV filling in patients with myocardial infarction, whereas LV pressure at mitral valve opening was the only significant determinant in control subjects.

Background. The aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in left ventricular diastolic function that occur in patients with chronic severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the absence or presence of prolonged therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Methods and Results. Left ventricular function data (cineangiography plus Millar, frame-by-frame analysis) and right ventricular volumes (radionuclide angiography) were obtained at baseline and after an average follow-up of 12.4 months in 42 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. After baseline measurements, the patients were randomized to placebo (n=16) or enalapril (10 mg BID, n=26). In the placebo group, the changes in left ventricular function were characterized by increases in end-diastolic (159+/-43 to 170+/-44 ML/M2 ) and end-systolic (119+/-38 to 128+/-49 mL/M2) volumes accompanied by a downward and rightward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. In contrast, decreases in end-diastolic (166+/-43 to 156+/-47 mL/M2 ) and end-systolic (125+/-43 to 111+/-42 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a slight upward and leftward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation were noted in the enalapril group. These changes in left ventricular volumes were significantly different between groups (both P<.005) but were not attended by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, in time constant of isovolumic pressure decrease, or in right ventricular volumes. However, the chamber stiffness constant 8 decreased from 0.044+/-0.027 to 0.032+/-0.019 mL-1/m2 in the placebo group, whereas it increased insignificantly in the enalapril group (0.040+/-0.028 to 0.041+/-0.028 mL-1/m2). These changes in chamber stiffness constant beta between baseline and follow-up were significantly different between placebo and enalapril groups (P<.05). Another index of chamber compliance, DELTA V/DELTA P, also confirmed the presence of opposite changes in left ventricular chamb

The changes in myocardial performance responsible for the progression from a stage of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction toward overt congestive heart failure are still poorly understood. Accordingly, using invasive methods, we examined the differences in baseline left ventricular function between a subgroup of patients enrolled in the treatment arm (presence of congestive heart failure) and in the prevention arm (asymptomatic patients) of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Methods and Results. High-fidelity left ventricular pressures and frame-by-frame angiographic volumes were simultaneously obtained under baseline conditions in 65 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less-than-or-equal-to 35%. Sixteen patients had New York Heart Association congestive heart failure (class II or III), whereas the remaining 49 patients had no clinical signs of heart failure and did not receive therapy for this syndrome. A second set of data was obtained an average of 12.4 months later in 42 patients. The group with heart failure had significantly greater end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes than the asymptomatic group (both p <0.001), but the stroke index at rest was similar in both groups. Accordingly, ejection fraction was significantly lower in the heart failure group (19.6+/-7.0% versus 26.3+/-7.2%; p<0.02). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was greater and peak +dP/dt was lower in heart failure patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Moreover, the individual end-systolic stress/end-systolic volume data of the heart failure patients fell within the 95% confidence interval of the relation observed in the patients without heart failure both at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up irrespective of their changes in functional status. It was also noted that during follow-up, the changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes correlated linearly, as if both dimen

The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanisms responsible for the increase in early filling rate observed during oral nisoldipine therapy in patients with ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. For that purpose, the global and regional LV function was analysed before and after 2 months of double-blind monotherapy with nisoldipine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo, in 17 patients with a previous anterior myocardial infarction. The baseline LV ejection fraction ranged from 34-51% and no patient had heart failure. Compared to the placebo, nisoldipine significantly lowered LV systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure (-3 mmHg vs +6 with the placebo; P less than 0.01) and the LV pressure at the time of mitral opening (-2.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg vs +3.5 +/- 3.0; P less than 0.01). Despite this reduction in driving pressure, the global LV early peak filling rate improved with nisoldipine only and this improvement was related to a selective increase in expansion rate of the anterior areas, from 1010 +/- 360 to 1339 +/- 496 mm2.s-1 (P less than 0.001). The time to regional peak filling rate (-8%; P less than 0.01), the asynchrony of diastolic wall motion and the regional ejection fraction (33 +/- 10 to 38 +/- 12%; P less than 0.001) also improved in the anterior areas with nisoldipine but not with the placebo. In contrast, in the inferior, control zones, the regional ejection fraction and filling rate remained unchanged, both when compared to baseline and to the placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty-six patients with mild to moderate heart failure were studied to determine the effects of epinine infusion (at a rate producing plasma levels similar to those measured after oral administration of 100 mg of the prodrug ibopamine) on left ventricular (LV) function (14 patients), and coronary flow and circulating catecholamines (12 patients). The only significant hemodynamic change at an infusion rate of 0.5 microgram/kg/min was a 9% (p less than 0.05) decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). At an infusion rate of 1 microgram/kg/min (mean free epinine plasma levels 14.3 +/- 3.7 ng/ml), heart rate (HR), dP/dtmax (1,405 +/- 255 to 1,490 +/- 320 mm Hg, NS), (dP/dt)/DP40, and the relaxation rate remained unchanged, but the ejection fraction (EF) increased from 32 to 38% (p less than 0.001), cardiac output (CO) increased, and SVR decreased by 22% (p less than 0.05). In a separate group of 12 patients, epinine infusion at rates of 0.5-1 microgram/kg/min produced no significant changes in coronary blood flow or myocardial oxygen uptake. At these infusion rates, arterial norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) levels decreased slightly and arterial and coronary sinus epinephrine increased. In conclusion, epinine, at concentrations similar to those achieved during therapeutic use of ibopamine, had negligible effect on myocardial contractility and relaxation rate in heart failure patients. Cardiac pump function was improved by a decrease in SVR rather than by inotropic stimulation. The data also suggest that these low concentrations of epinine may modulate the sympathetic nervous system, but further studies are needed to determine whether this effect could have clinical significance.

To assess the effects of nisoldipine on chronically underperfused myocardial areas ("hibernating myocardium"), the global and regional left ventricular (LV) function was analyzed before and after 2 months of double-blind monotherapy with nisoldipine (10 mg twice daily) or placebo in 17 patients with a previous anterior myocardial infarction. The baseline LV ejection fraction ranged from 34 to 51%, and no patient had heart failure. Compared to placebo, nisoldipine significantly lowered the LV systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure (-3 vs. +6 mmHg with placebo; p < 0.01) and the LV pressure at the time of mitral valve opening (-2.0 +/- 3.4 vs. +3.5 +/- 3.0 mm Hg; p < 0.01). Despite this reduction in driving pressure, the global LV early peak filling rate improved only with nisoldipine and this improvement was related to a selective increase in the expansion rate of the anterior areas, from 1,010 +/- 360 to 1,339 +/- 496 mm2/s (p < 0.001). The time to regional peak filling rate (-8%; p < 0.01), the asynchrony of diastolic wall motion, and the regional ejection fraction (33 +/- 10 to 38 +/- 12%; p < 0.001) also improved in the anterior areas with nisoldipine but not with placebo. In contrast, in the inferior control zones, the regional ejection fraction and filling rate remained unchanged, both when compared to baseline and to placebo. In conclusion, prolonged nisoldipine therapy had no significant effect on the normal myocardium but improved systolic and diastolic function in hypokinetic areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Studies of Langendorff-perfused rat hearts have revealed a biphasic response of the mitochondrial respiratory chain to global ischaemia. The initial effect is a 30-40% increase in the rate of glutamate/malate oxidation after 10 min of ischaemia, owing to an increase in the capacity for NADH oxidation. This effect is followed by a progressive decrease in these oxidative activities as the ischaemia is prolonged, apparently owing to damage to Complex I at a site subsequent to the NADH dehydrogenase component. This damage is exacerbated by reperfusion, which causes a further decrease in Complex I activity and also decreases the activities of the other complexes, most notably of Complex III. Perfusion for up to 1 h with anoxic buffer produced only the increase in NADH oxidase activity, and neither anoxia alone, nor anoxia and reperfusion, caused loss of Complex I activity. Perfusing for 3-10 min with anoxic buffer before 1 h of global ischaemia had a significant protective effect against the ischaemia-induced damage to Complex I.

An association between raised renin levels and myocardial infarction has been reported. We studied the effects of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on the development of myocardial infarction and unstable angina in 6797 patients with ejection fractions less-than-or-equal-to 0.35 enrolled into the two Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 3401) or enalapril (n = 3396) at doses of 2.5-20 mg per day in two concurrent double-blind trials with the same protocol. Patients with heart failure entered the treatment trial (n = 2569) and those without heart failure entered the prevention trial (n = 4228). Follow-up averaged 40 months. In each trial there were significant reductions in the number of patients developing myocardial infarction (treatment trial: 158 placebo vs 127 enalapril, p < 0.02; prevention trial: 204 vs 161 p < 0.01) or unstable angina (240 vs 187 p < 0.001; 355 vs 312, p < 0.05). Combined, there were 362 placebo group patients with myocardial infarction compared with 288 in the enalapril group (risk reduction 23%, 95% Cl 11-34%; p < 0.001). 595 placebo group patients developed unstable angina compared with 499 in the enalapril group (risk reduction 20%, 95% Cl 9-29%, p < 0.001). There was also a reduction in cardiac deaths (711 placebo, 615 enalapril; p < 0.003), so that the reduction in the combined endpoint of deaths, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina was highly significant (20% risk reduction, 95% CI 14-26%; p < 0.0001). Enalapril treatment significantly reduced myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and cardiac mortality in patients with low ejection fractions.

The new beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist cicloprolol acts as a beta-agonist at normal levels and as a beta-antagonist at high levels of adrenergic discharge. Treatment with cicloprolol should protect the heart against excessive stimulation, while providing a baseline level of sympathetic drive. The clinical interest of such a profile is, however, not yet established in heart failure. Accordingly this study examined the safety of oral cicloprolol, a step necessary before undertaking efficacy comparison with other compounds recently proposed to treat heart failure. Twenty-five patients were studied. Cicloprolol was given once a day for 2 weeks in a crossover double-blind placebo-controlled design. Follow-ups were obtained at baseline and at the end of each period. At baseline all patients had clear evidence of heart failure. Cicloprolol did not affect resting heart rate and blood pressure, but it reduced significantly peak exercise heart rate and peak rate-pressure product. The effect was especially significant in patients with sinus rhythm. The drug did not induce bradycardia or arrhythmias. Resting and exercise ejection rate were not affected. Cicloprolol improved the quality of life and the work capacity of 5 of 12 patients with congestive failure due to ischemic etiology. Side effects were few and similar with placebo and cicloprolol. Thus, short-term administration of cicloprolol is safe in moderate heart failure.

Background. In patients with heart failure, activation of the renin-angiotensin system is common an has been postulated to provide a stimulus for further left ventricular (LV) structural and functional derangement. We tested the hypothesis that chronic administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril prevents or reverses LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction among patients with depressed ejection fraction (EF) and symptomatic heart failure. Methods and Results. We examined subsets of patients enrolled in the Treatment Trial of Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Fifty-six patients with mild to moderate heart failure underwent serial radionuclide ventriculograms, and 16 underwent serial left heart catheterizations, before and after randomization to enalapril (2.5-20 mg/day) or placebo. At 1 year, there were significant treatment differences in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV; p<0.01), end-systolic volume (ESV; p<0.005), and EF (p<0.05). These effects resulted from increases in EDV (mean +/- SD, 136+/-27 to 151+/-38 ml/m2) and ESV (103+/-24 to 116+/-24 ml/m2) in the placebo group and decreases in EDV (140+/-44 to 127+/-37 ml/m2) and ESV (106+/-42 to 93+/-37 ml/m2) in the enalapril group. Mean LVEF increased in enalapril patients from 0.25+/-0.07 to 0.29+/-0.08 (p<0.01). There was a significant treatment difference in LV end-diastolic pressure at 1 year (p<0.05), with changes paralleling those of EDV. The time constant of LV relaxation changed only in the placebo group (p<0.01 versus enalapril), increasing from 59.2+/-8.0 to 67.8+/-7.2 msec. Serial radionuclide studies over a period of 33 months showed increases in LV volumes only in the placebo group. Two weeks after withdrawal of enalapril, EDV and ESV increased to baseline levels but not to the higher levels observed with placebo. Conclusions. In patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF, chronic ACE inhibition with enalapril prevents progressive LV dilatation and systolic